TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fun-Combination-Arna Archive

View 1 post and 23 comments by Fun-Combination-Arna on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
306

Social IssuesFun-Combination-Arna/r/MensRights18/05/25 10:53 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Hello, I dont agree that it exists right now Maybe it is because you are considering that patriarchy is an oppression that men do over women, but if you consider it (as I do) as a structural condition of our societies that oppress both men and women, you may agree that it is still present. Give that some thought and let me know.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 11:47 AM
1

Patriarchy has different meanings. In any case, it cannot be denied that certain social structures have limited women's rights during history while these same rights were not restricted to men comparatively. Facts cannot be refuted. What you can review is the interpretation of these facts and the conclusions that might be offered to you. Check Roxana Kreimer's work.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 06:54 PM
1

Thanks to you, man. I'm really glad it was useful. That's what motivates me to write. It's important that when we see a number, we try to understand whether the source is legit. We shouldn't just trust the message itself, and we need to put it in context. Ideological leaders often lie, and society tends to internalize those messages. But reality is usually very different from what social, political, and economic narratives, and mainstream media, tell us. Most of the time, that doesn't impact us …
/r/MensRights23/05/25 06:45 AM
1

Lol, thanks. Yeah, I put it together quickly during spare moments I could find. Even though I just included an infographic, there are hundreds of lines of source code and dozens of transformations and result analyses, so it’s not surprising if a few errors slipped in. The estimated figure is 31,448 (rounded to about 30,000). This is based on indirect calculations, since the UNODC does not publish gender breakdowns for convicted individuals. I initially tried to infer it using linear models and t…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 06:23 AM
1

Yeah, it's fixed. Thank you! Lol. I didn’t realize I had initially used the rounded figure (31K instead of 31,448, therefore).
/r/MensRights23/05/25 04:59 AM
2

Hi, Each group faces its own struggles. But when it comes to violent death and sacrifice, it's men who bear the heaviest burden. My second post on this subreddit was actually an introduction to that topic, but the moderators didn't approve it. I assume they had their reasons and they did not tell me, but I won't be posting here, anything, anymore because of that; it took me a long time to write, and I'll eventually share it elsewhere. Still, the facts remain: Men are systematically killed for be…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:48 AM
1

If anyone is worried about the disinformation about international politics, Tim Marshall, who has worked with the BBC, Sky, The Times and The Guardian, wrote "Prisoners of Geography" that explains quite well the dynamics and causes behind conflicts in places such as Ukraine and Russia and helps you avoid falling for propaganda and manipulation. Just fyi, it is very accessible compared to Brzezinski’s or Kissinger’s "World Order" btw
/r/MensRights20/05/25 05:41 PM
1

Thank you a lot for your kind words.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:33 PM
2

Hey, Your comment meant a lot. Thanks for reading with an open mind and for really seeing what I was trying to say. I was frustrated with Twitter It doesn’t foster real debate anymore just dunks outrage and people showing off nonsense. That’s why I created this anonymous Reddit account, to actually talk about socially relevant issues openly and without pressure. I'm an expert in applied statistical computing and I’ve got other competencies too. I try to use what I know to push back against polar…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 07:28 AM
3

What you're looking at isn't AI-generated, but real analysis: multi-level regression, causal inference, cross-country filtering, structured interpretation. This isn't what language models do. They follow patterns. This breaks the statistical assumptions language models use, because it is not imitative or probabilistic, but constructed. Unless you can point to an identical dataset, structure, and conclusion, there's no reason to doubt the originality. And you've shown nothing that challenges it. …
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:26 PM
2

You're right to question the use of the term femicide. Strictly speaking, it refers to women being killed because they are women. I used the broader institutional definition from UN Women and UNODC, which includes women killed by partners or family members, regardless of gender-based motivation. Social engineering on their part? Possibly. I understand the concern. It's true that similar forms of violence such as stonings, honor killings, or domestic murders also happen to men and are often overl…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 08:40 PM
2

Hehe, yeah, funny :) The reaction to the number said more than the number itself. Some see a joke in data, especially when it unsettles those most comfortable never having to think about it. Others see a model. The first kind usually fix cars. The second... design them. Maybe not every number is meant to be understood. Some require more than a wrench. All good.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 08:03 PM
2

Hi, I have improvised this chart. https://imgur.com/a/HVWdkOK Where According to the UNODC & UN Women report “Femicides in 2023”, around 51,000 women and girls were killed worldwide by intimate partners or family members in 2023. I checked on Google the global population (approx. 4.14 billion men, as 50.3% of the 8.2B total population in 2025), this means: ~1 man in 81,000 committed a femicide in that year. (Calculation: 51,000 ÷ 4,140,000,000 ≈ 0.0000123 → or ~0.00123%) On the other hand, crimi…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 07:30 PM
2

Fair. The math might look trivial, but the social framing it disrupts clearly isn't. My goal wasn't to complicate things, just to highlight that a basic statistical fact: Most men don’t kill. It has somehow become politically sensitive. That alone says a lot.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 05:50 PM
1

There are studies that might interest you, like Archer (2002), Desmarais et al. (2012), and Fiebert (2014). They examine patterns of physical aggression across sexes in detail. The data shows that both men and women engage in violence, though the forms and consequences often differ. It's a complex picture, more complex than it may seem. I’ve provided some details elsewhere in the thread, in a reply to iainmf.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 05:46 PM
3

Yeah, it was to be expected that part of the comment section would lean into personal frustration. That happens whenever a topic touches something deeply social and deeply unresolved. Still, the post isn't about grievance. It's a statistical correction: most men don't kill, and generalizing from extreme outliers distorts public understanding. That doesn't deny gendered violence or structural imbalance in any case. It just introduces granularity & clarity. Precision is what lets us move forward w…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 05:41 PM
3

Here the DOIs: Archer, J. (2002). DOI: 10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00061-1 Desmarais, S. L., et al. (2012). DOI: 10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.170 Fiebert, M. S. (2014). DOI: 10.1007/s12119-013-9194-1 Fiebert, M. S. & Gonzalez, D. M. (1997). DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1997.80.2.583 My actual intention is to offer reasoned arguments that can bring men and women closer together. My next study will likely focus on certain stigmas surrounding women, specifically, how societal expectations and personal relationships can inf…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 05:31 PM
6

I've attempted to post a much more detailed comment on Reddit, but the platform isn't letting me submit it, possibly due to formatting or moderation filters. Here's a brief summary instead: I’ve conducted statistical analysis on the relationship between male and female arrest rates and their connection to incarceration, focusing on how sensitive conviction likelihood is to the sex of the arrestee. While I haven’t written a full report, the patterns are well-established. Regarding violence, I agr…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 05:28 PM
6

It’s OK if it didn’t click for you. I’m not trying to win a debate. Just making something visible: most men, around 3.5 billion, don’t kill. That shouldn’t be controversial. Yet somehow it is. The graph condenses a full statistical model based on global homicide data from UNODC. The imputations come from the Global Study on Homicide, specifically the 2019 edition (UN hides the real figures), though the updated 2023 version is also available. Sources: https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-anal…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 04:32 PM
4

The goal of this post (and of the broader study behind it) is precisely to move beyond sectarian thinking and the cyclical reproduction of hostility between human groups. Relying on stereotypes, even as a reaction to others' prejudice, only deepens division and obscures the actual causes of violence. What I’ve shared is a small part of a larger analysis aimed at understanding violence through data, not ideology. The point is not to defend one side against another (as you rightly point out that s…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:28 AM
3

You're right to point out the absurdity of that logic. Assuming guilt based solely on appearance is not reasoning, it is prejudice. And it does not align with any evidence-based understanding of violence. The data shows that the vast majority of men are not violent. Treating them as if they are does not improve safety. It replaces facts with fear. If the goal is to reduce harm, then the focus must be on individual behavior, context, and actual causes, not on collective blame.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:21 AM
1

I just want to say that my message is about raising awareness around the stigma and issues that men face, which often go unnoticed or unspoken. At the same time, we can clearly see that there is a specific kind of violence that women suffer just for being women. It might not always match exactly how institutions define it, but it definitely exists and it matters. I think it's important to recognize that different groups experience different forms of violence. Acknowledging one doesn't take away …
/r/MensRights19/05/25 08:09 AM
10

You're right. And there's an even deeper issue: It's not "men" who kill. It's criminals. Because it is only an extremely marginal fraction of men who kill. Therefore, men do not kill, because women also kill in a similar magnitude, and, for that reason, sex is not what determines the number of homicides (no more than ~5% of the variance in homicides is explained by sex, the other 95% it is not). Is male sex a cause? Yes, is it only a very marginal non-representative cause? Yes. Saying "men kill"…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 07:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter