~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?subjugating No, you mean the men at the bottom of the pecking order. They are more subordinate to women than women were subordinate to men under patriarchy. It may be hard for you to understand, but it is true. Take a look around. Our society is in a nightmare of decline and is being destroyed because of whoring around women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/09/22 10:35 PM |
| 1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?Okay, like any woman, you are very far from logic and reality and real words. Trouble for you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/09/22 10:22 PM |
| 1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?What's wrong with supporting a fair order of things and my own decastratization and reproductive and resource deenslavement? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/09/22 09:32 PM |
| 1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?It is a fact statement. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/09/22 07:40 AM |
| 1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?So it's not that much different from the statistics in love marriages, except for second arranged marriages having better stats than the first ones (whereas marriages after the first one have worse stats in love marriages.) These are not exactly marriages, these are attempts to arrange marriage. The first attempt is end in failure in 30-40% of cases, the second one in about 15%, the third one in about 2-3% etc. You think abortion is a new invention? Their abortions, if they even exist, are ineff… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/09/22 07:16 AM |
| 1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?Seriously? In either of those cases he would be missing either a father (male role model) or a mother (female role model) in the home. Married each other gay and lesbian. You claimed arranged marriages inherently have longevity and all that jazz. Somewhere between 30% and 40% of arranged marriage attempts among the Ju end in failure as far as I remember, and second marriages are already taking place with greater success. And all of those could be due to numerous factors (societal pressure, secre… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/09/22 06:42 AM |
| 1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?One was the child of parents who were arrange-married and he said he felt like Voldemort because he grew up with parents who were in a loveless marriage who never showed each other any romantic affection. But the alternative of single parenting with a sexually liberal feminist mother is worse. And he would feel incredibly worse than Voldemort in that case. His parents could be even gays and lesbian, but it is still better, than such a single mother. «All first marriages are arranged by parents, … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/09/22 04:51 PM |
| 1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?Even if an arranged couple don't abuse each other, that still doesn't automatically mean they're in love with each other What If they are happy with each other? and would be with each other without familial and societal pressure. But they remain together even after the death of their parents. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/09/22 07:37 AM |
| 1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?Longevity doesn't prove love. But the attested jokes and ease of interaction really prove the love between the spouses. I have absolutely no qualms about killing in self-defense OK, you have just left yourself to the wolves. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/22 11:31 PM |
| 1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?You can't force someone to love you Then how is it that all these enforcements end up in loving marriages in primitive societies? Look, the Plains Indians (they were big game hunters) built their whole existence and culture on kidnapping and raping women. Including the kidnapping of white women during the time of colonization. Imagine yourself in the position that such a man kidnaps you and takes you as a wife. Your actions? What would you do? You would have no choice but to become his loving wi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/22 10:49 PM |
| 0 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?So you're advocating for gold-digger/sugar-daddy loveless transactions Why loveless? You can combine love and transaction. Men for hundreds of thousands of years have obtained loving and helpful wives through military campaigns. And if women did not become attached to their new husbands, they simply would not survive. Love was an instinct developed after living with a man. Women simply had no choice not to fall in love. men wouldn't have had to enslave women in order to enforce them. You say tha… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/22 09:51 PM |
| 0 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?No, it would be enough to return to the traditional social contract, dictated by nature, according to which a woman was married to a man if he could support her. Problem solved. There is some natural asymmetry between men and women: women cannot pay such benefits to men, except through the reproductive capabilities of their bodies, since they are already a net negative for men and our society in terms of production and consumption. Men can do it and do it more. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/22 08:46 PM |
| 1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?So you're still choosing to ignore the examples I've listed and you're still choosing to not do your own research to educate yourself. I even have a degree in ancient history and classical philology, so it's really hard for me to understand your logic, but ok. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/22 08:22 PM |
| 1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?Which oppression, again? What does oppression mean? The unwillingness of men to become expendable slaves of women who whore around? What are your alternatives? Do you understand that 80% of men would be excluded from the mating pool forever in this case? But would they still have to make up for women's promiscuity with the labor of their body and, so that society does not fall apart, support someone else's offspring? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/22 07:52 PM |
| 0 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?No, because women could not plow, build houses, clear forests, or do blacksmithing. Or any other exhausting physical labor, which was then the only possible way to earn money. You are comparing the past with what you are now, where you can now sit in a comfortable chair (invented and made by men) in a well air-conditioned office (built and invented by men), drink water and get paid for it. Men still provide for women to a large extent, but simply allowed women to be more collectively dependent o… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/22 07:07 PM |
| -1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?that "very small nuance" made women second-class citizens and enabled a lot of abuse! How? You do not provide any evidence or facts. Men could live independently Yes, because they could provide themselves. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/22 06:05 PM |
| -1 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?It's common knowledge that in arguably all cultures throughout human history women and girls were basically sold off via utilitarian arranged (many outright forced) marriage. Except for this very small nuance, they had the same full rights as men. With a few cultures that allowed for prostitution, harems and adultery. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/22 05:26 PM |
| 0 | Shouldn't men get extra benefits and privileges since only they bear the responsibility and obligation of having to defend the country during an invasion? If you have to do more you should get more right?When women were regarded as property? With facts and proofs, please. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/22 01:49 PM |
| 1 | This sub just doesn’t believe in loveheight https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781963/ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/09/22 06:46 PM |
| 2 | “When men sleep around no one cares, in fact, it’s almost applauded. Yet when women sleep around, she’s considered promiscuous and shamed for it.” Sorry ladies, it’s not the same thing, no matter how much you want it to beNo line of thinking is worth respecting just because some cultures have supported it for "ages". The vast majority of cultures throughout most of human evolutionary history. I don't think it just happened. It's still just as wrong and hypocritical. Why is it wrong and hypocritical? they are being socially responsible There is nothing socially responsible about sex outside of marriage because it burdens (enslaves) other men with raising other people's children or otherwise leads to the destructio… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/07/22 09:24 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter