TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FunctionPlastic Archive

View 0 posts and 53 comments by FunctionPlastic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Most of these statements are misleading and obfuscate the true source of the difference in sexual behavior: female sex drive is biologically significantly lower than men's.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 01:25 PM
8

Maybe it's different in America but I've found "casual sex" to be a scam, i.e. it's not casual, you're already in her boyfriend trial run and woe be upon you if you're an introverted person who actually expected anything casual. It's an extremely draining and frustrating experience (unless you're a sociopath or a mean person I suppose).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 07:08 PM
1

It's so funny that she's probably far more correct about reality than you are. She doesn't care about "rejecting biologial essentialism" or some other pomo bullshit. Her instincts correctly lead her to like alpha men and despise weaklings. "Hating the patriarchy" isn't about ideas, it's about power, which women are naturally drawn to. Homosexuality really is disgusting to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 12:46 PM
4

I don't think this is some innate male trait to protect. More probably: we all correctly infer women are really fragile. I can tell my buddy to fuck of or give him shit because I know he can take it. Meanwhile it's pretty common for women to just break down and cry over things.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 09:50 AM
3

Every single time I try to assert that some statistical principle holds I get people complaining "but what about the outliers!" There are objective beauty standards. The fact that some women might get off on ugly men due to whatever reasons (power trips etc.) does not change that general fact. Every single person may disagree about an ordering of even 10 people but the more people you ask the more obvious it will be that some of those individuals tend to be rated higher while some tend to be rat…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 03:51 PM
2

There absolutely is an objective ordering. The fact that criminals do relatively well on this ordering may be surprising to some (but not anyone who thinks a bit about what makes men attractive).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 11:34 AM
1

This is the wrong way to look at it. It's not about urges at all. It's about the implicit agreement within a relationship. The man breaks the agreement by cheating under normal circumstances, and the woman by withholding sex. Why would any man be in an exclusive relationship without sex? It's not that he would be driven mad by his oh so animalistic urges and therefore cannot be held accountable for his actions. No, there is no need to hold him accountable at all, because the agreement was alread…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 10:03 PM
1

The consequences of not eating or sleeping are death. You won't die from the lack of sex, sure. But plenty of men would kill for it. Even today when we're no longer organized as warring tribes (tribes didn't war that much for food, it's about the thrill of getting all their women), quite a lot of crime is committed indirectly for sex. Unless we're talking about high-end organized crime or strictly druggies trying to get their fix, crime is essentially a way for people (especially in disadvantage…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 09:52 PM
1

Individual variation and preference exist. This does not mean looks are relative, it just means that their evaluation is not completely deterministic. There are presumably some women really into short guys, and even more men really into fat women. This does not mean that the overwhelming consensus is not in the opposite direction. If common sense that there are objectively attractive people and objectively unattractive people is not convincing, there's loads of research on this. People's ranking…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/21 08:14 AM
2

Nah it's just retarded
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/21 04:14 PM
0

Looks are relative Imagine believing this lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/21 11:42 AM
6

This makes no sense lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/21 10:58 AM
0

A large part of human nature really is genetic, ingrained, evolved, immutable. Of course it responds to the environment, kind of like your IQ decreasing with repeated hammer blows to the head, but we can speak of human nature and we know men and women differ psychologically. There's untold volumes of evolutionary psychology research on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 11:17 AM
1

The name zoomer has nothing to do with Zoom the software. The term is older than that (maybe not technically, but it predates the pandemic by several years which is when Zoom the software entered the public consciousness).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 11:08 AM
2

I'm sure lots of men evaluating potential partners for LTR/marriage care about this. I just don't agree that it's the job of the concept of 'attractiveness' to include these cases. Attractiveness as a concept should be dominated by things you can sense, primarily see. If I see a thin young pale art hoe with black hair and a cute face which happens to be my type, my judgement on her attractiveness shouldn't change if I suddenly learn she has slept with an astonishing, record breaking one million …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 07:59 PM
3

Crime rates will rise, more men will turn towards hedonism and hobbies, people will feel less connection to the community. Wait a second....
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 06:53 PM
5

There is an inverse relationship between a woman’s attractiveness* and her n-count Nope. In your head
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 06:21 PM
0

His advice was actually good
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 02:32 PM
2

I don't believe it has anything to do with race, I have made literally no comment on that. It would be surprising if it had any significant difference accross races, compared to difference across sex. Their anecdotes are equally worthless. Absolutely not, one is a statement about a population, another is a statement about an instance brought up as a counter to the original statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 04:38 PM
2

I have made no comment about how other women are, you are again imagining things Due to evolutionary reasons my guess is that they are mostly the same in this respect. Sex is a huge cost independent of race. And empirical data on sex differences in sex drives is consistent with this reasoning: women don't have nearly as potent sex drives as men do, independent of race.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 04:34 PM
1

It's almost as if people generally form correct inferences about populations they find themselves in. Countering them with "my cousin saw this one person which defied common sense and perception" is retarded. And numerous studies about sex differences are literally a google away no one is stopping you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 04:09 PM
2

I live in eastern europe I have literally never been with a woman that wasn't pale, but I'll leave you to assume random things you're clearly not well
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 04:07 PM
1

You could replace the miles of text written about TRP and such topics with just one sex-drives and preferences statistics. All the rest follows from that. It's amazing to me how many people actually seem to believe that women want sex as much as men. Not even close.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 03:32 PM
7

let me counter your point about the population-wide general preferences with this one personal anecdote
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 03:28 PM
1

This holds for everyone in fact, I was talking cumulatively, not just one rich dude buying yacht. An enormous part of the economy is status driven. It informs almost every purchase.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 09:48 PM
1

Even in my country where college doesn't put you into any debt at all, people go to college not because of a rational economic decision, but because people of their class/status go there and it's expected of them. Not going signals a light failure. The "you'll make more money" explanation, while probably true on average, is not the whole story.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 09:43 PM
1

No that's not what I meant. You said the alpha/beta distinction is # sex encounters. I said it was dominance. They just happen to be correlated because the primary motivator to be dominant (aside from innate genetics is sex. Even if there wasn't a single dude who wasn't an alpha but still got laid, I would still stick by this definition I gave because I believe it's more salient. We're looking for what alpha/beta means (diff. in dominance), not what it causes (diff. in # sex encounters).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 04:25 PM
1

Yeah agreed. By "many" I didn't mean "majority", lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 04:21 PM
1

What I'm not the person you were responding to I literally don't understand what you meant by government offices. I come from a real country where we don't let women work in government, sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 04:19 PM
1

Well even if you verified it a single example still shouldn't mean anything. But I was arguing against your model by presenting an alternative one. Male intrasex dominance predicts sex #, I agree with that, what I disagree with is that it is the same thing. I think it's a related but different concept. Alphas to me bring up images of guys who are often physically stronger but most of all confident and courageous. They are dominant (socially), betas are not. My example illustrates one way a man c…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 03:45 PM
1

Holy shit this comment is expertly written. It's fucking beautiful
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 03:34 PM
2

downgraded This is a massive upgrade lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 03:23 PM
1

Not much you can do about standing up for yourself when you're physically weak. All the courage in the world won't save you if you're just not dumb enough to cause a fight you'd lose. A lot of men meme themselves into thinking they're courageous and then get hospitalized.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 03:18 PM
1

I'm nerdy, neurotic, and most of all very socially anxious. The opposite of an alpha. Yet I'm not short and have a good face so I've have had way above average success rate with women. I don't think the distinction is about the body count, it's a social dominance hierarchy and is primarily intrasexual. (It's correlated and exusts because of women, of course, but still)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 03:13 PM
2

How is he an idiot when it comes to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 03:01 PM
0

Isn't Elon Musk considered hot?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 03:01 PM
1

I'm the exact opposite of that guy. Maybe my testosterone is low but I have actively avoided women because they are a drain on me and I want to focus on doing my own shit. My answer is also zero, even negative: I'd sacrifice the women to go study conputer science. It's not really easy because even if my T is low, my sex drive didn't get the message. The only thing that makes it doable is knowing that I'm so annoyed by physical intimacy that the sex wouldn't be satisfying at all. It happened like…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 02:57 PM
10

This is clearly untrue, chads go for young women most of all, because young women are more attractive. So the reason you gave is superflous, whether or not it was true all men would still prefer young women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 02:49 PM
1

Do yourself a huge favor, and do take a stroll through ANY govt office, and DARE to count fem vs male employees there... What are you implying
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 02:38 PM
-1

Would you bang them though? I'm the same but I sometimes fantasise about it because it seems like a way easier ordeal lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 02:33 PM
6

Dude the thread is very specifically about physical beauty not what you think of their manners. If there was an african tribe where they sacrificially burned babies and helpless old people alive, some of them still might be beautiful no matter what you thought of the practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 02:29 PM
-7

I find many women ugly. Even more just have bland faces to me. Especially as they age it starts being obvious. I would still fuck most of them if it was free though (but not if they were fat and ugly/bland)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 02:27 PM
1

Literally the opposite is true for most people! The indebted media intern has a way higher chance with a HVF than a rich plumber. Higher potential for political power too. And different social circles.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 02:07 PM
1

I mean I bet that statistically there is a difference. Of course there are individual cases. But again, university is not about intelligence, it is about entering into a shared culture of the middle-upper class. I'm sure there's plumbers who could eat an average humanities student for breakfast in a discussion about pre-Socratic philosophy, but that's because a plumber that knows anything about that is almost certainly driven by his own innate curiosity and talent, which again is not a requireme…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 02:03 PM
1

Education is class. Why do you think parents pay millions to get their kids into Ivy League? Why do you think people spend 10 years of enormous effort and then indebt themselves with the singular goal of getting into a good university That gender studies chick is hoping to raise her class and therefore SMV by going to college
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 01:56 PM
1

It's social class, not financials. Your net worth might be infinitely higher than some indebted media studies intern, but you're in completely different social circles and are of different class. That's not to say you're not in a better situation overall
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 01:52 PM
1

This is exactly what class differences are about: shared culture (with status implications)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 01:46 PM
1

Because status isn't just financial. You can have more money than a plumber and still be low status. And someone living in a hugh-rent place working a low paid media internship can be broke and indebted. But they're way higher status. It's about culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 01:39 PM
1

This is an extremely low bar if we're talking about status.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 01:34 PM
2

Money is more important. Yeah this is what low status non-rich people think. Rich people spend billions buying status.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 01:30 PM
3

You're trying to censor other because they don't agree with your political views No one uses that lol
/r/MensRights22/09/14 08:16 AM
-2

I mean she's also a woman, so we can just assume she was lying. Got confirmed by a doctor? Nah fuck that, think about the poor man!
/r/MensRights02/05/14 04:13 PM
3

I think circumcision should definitely be illegal for both boys and girls, but it's really much more gruesome for girls, that's why it was easier to get it banned.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter