TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FunctioningFully Archive

View 1 post and 172 comments by FunctioningFully on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
41

DiscriminationFunctioningFully/r/MensRights29/09/18 03:18 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You know the big old G.O.D. always getting shit wrong.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 06:53 AM
5

He does, but not becouse he's sexually aroused by it. Still disgusting but not a paedophile. No way to know that, here's a good idea: Stay out of kids pants and I won't call you a pedo. Pretty straight forward. Do what you like, all I'm saying is that you'll maybe find yourself in a similar situation in real life and brandish someone a pedophile who actually isn't thus ruining their life Solution: Don't have an obsession with getting adults into the pantaloons of kids. You'll avoid any such issu…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 06:27 AM
7

Sounds like a pedophile to me, he wants adults to enforce their preferences on the genitals of children. I'll call a pedo a pedo thanks, I don't need your permission.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 06:15 AM
3

It's called money, and then there's the issue of some religions (i.e. Islam and Judaism) which consider it their right so anyone who says "Boys deserve autonomy over their own bodies too!" gets branded an islamophobe or anti-semite.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:42 AM
4

Yes it does. Again, no it does not. It is a meaningless procedure not recommended by most countries in the civilized world, it also can inversely increase risks by creating a false perception of immunity when in fact a condom is orders of magnitudes more effective. I was politely saying "get educated". But I guess you cant even understand that. And I'm politely saying that you need to leave kids penises alone you fucking pedophile. I dont perform the surgery tho??? You just seem real concerned a…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:40 AM
1

No, you were lied to, and were she to ruin your mattress you'd be justified in suing her in small claims court.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:35 AM
1

Rape by Fraud absolutely is a crime in California, for instance. Yeah but how about in states that aren't backwards and non-sensical? In California it was almost certainly rape anyways due to the absurd "Affirmative Consent" laws. ​
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:33 AM
1

Sounds pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:30 AM
1

Must be a lot of women producing sperm. Something something "BODILY AUTOMONY".....
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:30 AM
1

The opinions of women about you should not matter to you, your worth has to be determined by your or you will be destined to be unhappy. Do good things, set good examples, earn good money, do things that make you proud of yourself, any accolades or appreciation that comes out of that is secondary, any lack of such is irrelevant. ​ ​
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:28 AM
11

Male circumcision has medical benefits (like less risk of certain infections) and thus , unlike female circumcision (which IS mutilation as it serves no medical purpose), is a medical decision. No it does not, it can also lead to death or loss of the penis. Unless it is a necessary medical decision to save a life parents should have zero say. His body his choice. Most of the civilized world is uncircumcised and they have better health outcomes than the U.S. you inbred troglodyte. Go do some firs…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:22 AM
1

Can you imagine if men were using a weight filter that aggressively? There'd be a riot. The earth would literally shake as said women rode their motorized scooters down Broadway. Edit: Broadstreet? Am I drunk? Time for bed, no more over nighters.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:13 AM
6

There's also the forced "HERo" nonsense as well. The whole movie was apparently rife with this nonsense, although apparently not as bad as other movies like Ghostbusters (which was a literal trainwreck).
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:11 AM
16

"You're going to the dentist" is a decision parents can make for their children. "We're going to mutilate your genitals" is not, seriously the 1400s called and they'd like their worldview back.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:10 AM
2

"You're only saying that to make people think you're good" vs "Your opinion is irrelevant because of your sex". One of these is about 4 orders of magnitude more unacceptable.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 04:24 AM
3

No, that's nonsense only men can! I mean why is there no "Femsplaining"?
/r/MensRights18/03/19 04:23 AM
3

The difference is that "mansplaining" is a sexist and bigoted comment and anyone who uses it for any reason should be deeply ashamed of themselves. "Virtue signalling" doesn't blame your behavior on some arbitrary physical characteristic you have.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 04:21 AM
15

She's still alive, there's still time.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 04:18 AM
7

Down voted for a half-assed post that doesn't explain what it means.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 04:15 AM
1

"Nobody can talk about this while everybody is searching for this, you're allowed to have your views but nobody can see them, you can post them later when they're irrelevant and nobody is talking about it anymore". Sorry, but I can't approve of that. I don't know what types of arguments people are making on this but I would rather hear them. You're silencing discussion in a critical timeperiod to limit effectiveness of arguments, it's just the same as if you shutdown right before an election - y…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 04:14 AM
0

Meaning that you're silencing them when it matters most. It's like you're saying "HEY NO DISCUSSING POLITICS BEFORE THE MIDTERMS!"
/r/MensRights18/03/19 04:11 AM
18

Lead Actress basically said she didn't want to talk to "White Male Reviewers" because apparently hating men and being racist are trendy and acceptable. Any sane and non-bigoted person says "Who cares what a person looks like, it's the quality of their character that matters" but it seems this is not her way.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 04:09 AM
1

Your argument is "Some tiny percent of people occasionally stifle their emotions, and some percentage of those people are male, therefore it's toxic masculinity" which is idiotic and lacks critical thinking. ​ You ignore the countless people who aren't male that exhibit that behavior. You don't explain the overwhelming majority of men who DON'T engage in said behavior. You then take this asinine and half baked conclusion - without so much as correlating evidence - and declare Masculinity the pro…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 03:41 AM
2

And who uses that annoying phrase? It seems the vast majority who use it, complain it's used to excuse abhorrent behaviour. That same phrase originated with parents describing how boys are often more hyperactive than girls for example, it was always meant to mean "Boys quirks are okay, we don't have to change that". Now a days we just pump them full of ADHD meds until they sit still like the girls do of course because recess is a vanishing past time.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 03:35 AM
1

He also had some really interesting views on how you could utilize acid to a similar end. Swell guy that Kellog....yeap
/r/MensRights18/03/19 03:33 AM
6

Yeah it's pretty fucked, and as predicted aging Hollywood actresses love it: https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/7836602/foreskin-facial-kate-beckinsale-how-serum-made/
/r/MensRights18/03/19 03:31 AM
3

This is absolutely correct, they inferred rape by saying "any woman who drank prior to sex was raped because she couldn't consent", this is of course wildly infantilizing and incorrect.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 03:29 AM
1

"boys will be boys" This always meant that boys are quirky and that their quirks don't make them bad, your hatred of men and boys is the problem here. downplaying of inappropriate aggression No one EVER downplays female aggression right? That's why it's a "masculinity" issue and not a human issue? or the stifling of healthy emotions Again, apparently women never ever under any circumstance do this. or the pressure to be "alpha" Again, wasn't aware women never ever did this, apparently men are re…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 03:28 AM
15

Wow, you're pretty fucked in the head. I'd go with "You're never allowed to cut a person against their will".
/r/MensRights18/03/19 03:24 AM
1

First, he defines trans women as "men who think they are women". That's not what transgenderism is. That's exactly what they are. It's called a Mental Illness.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 01:21 AM
1

Science also once claimed that black people are inferior. What you are seeing is wildly corrupt leftist science which seeks to satisfy conclusions.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 01:18 AM
3

Your argument perfectly defeats the sexist notion of "Toxic Masculinity" quite well. "Look at all these men cat calling women!" acts as though all men do it, or that men do it because they're men, or that only men do it. Anyone who uses the phrase "Toxic Masculinity" is trying to say "Some men are bad, therefore these bad behaviors are inherently male!" these beliefs come from Feminist patriarchy theory in which Men are subhuman "oppressors" and women are innocent and flawless victims.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 01:16 AM
4

Bliss emphasized a discovery of the authentic self through spiritual searching and communing with nature and an exploration of emotions, from grief to ecstasy. The goal is to foster more male-positive behaviors, ultimately leading to men becoming better humans as well as happier in their own skin. This guy is a clown, but beyond that his irrelevant and I'd wager about 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% of the human race know anything about him. That makes him fully irrel…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 01:06 AM
11

This user is a troll, they have no karma and registered today. Additionally they have only posted 5 times and all 5 posts have been trollish in nature.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 12:18 AM
2

Feminism is a political movement with it's own ideology (Patriarchy Theory, in which Men are subhuman oppressors and Women are victims) and will be judged by it's actions. When a words usage does not match the definition we update the definition what we don't do is say "Oh but you have to like X, it's defined like Y!". Feminism is a hate movement, it's time to get the definition updated to reflect that.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 12:16 AM
4

It's probably wherever the evidence is.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 12:13 AM
3

No it is not. It was always a bigoted and hateful term. Mind your condescension bigot.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 12:08 AM
3

Feminism was always hateful and ridiculous it was never about equality.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 11:16 PM
6

They use the Mary P. Koss school of though "Men should never be considered raped when he engages in non-consensual sex with a woman", she's the author of the nonsensical "1-in-5 women are raped" study that they so love to cite.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 11:15 PM
5

I getcha, I just don't want people to think it's a legitimate thing, can't have this kind of bigoted language be normalized ya know?
/r/MensRights17/03/19 11:13 PM
10

"Toxic Masculinity" is not real, it's just a way of saying "X bad behavior is men's fault" and denying that women ever participate in it.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 10:36 PM
7

"Toxic masculinity" is a way of saying "Only men do these things because men are despicable and subhuman" i.e. "Catcalling" which women do as well. "Toxic Masculinity" is bigotry and you are a sexist, you are saying "Men and only men do these things" there's a reason the words "Toxic Femininity" are never employed.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 10:35 PM
34

Feminists and anti-semites (increasingly overlapping, Feminism sure loves Islam) will celebrate as a good man is dead.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 10:30 PM
12

John Harvey Kellog pushed it as a way to prevent masturbation in boys. The process continues because it is WILDLY profitable with foreskins being used in facial cremes and many other cosmetics.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 10:28 PM
8

Studies have also shown that it reduces the length of free tissue thus reducing the size of erections (although not to extreme degrees). It's an exploitation opportunity at every angle.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 10:27 PM
24

Is that before other industries harvest the parts and make cremes and such out of them?
/r/MensRights17/03/19 10:24 PM
23

How do you know it isn't the father?
/r/MensRights17/03/19 10:23 PM
62

There's also billion dollar industries around it as the foreskins get their fibroblasts harvest for things like face cremes.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 10:22 PM
54

What percentage of a boys penis do you think is acceptable to cut off against his will?
/r/MensRights17/03/19 10:21 PM
2

Interesting how women are never the opposing force in your list.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 12:22 AM
2

"If you didn't vote for HER then you hate womyn!"
/r/MensRights28/02/19 12:05 AM
4

racist, fascist, extremist speech, support of pedophilia and anti-semitism, or generally antisocial behavior. No one is talking about associating ourselves with the radical left.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 12:04 AM
1

The current objective of Marxism is the same as it's always been: analysis of the capitalist system and class struggle - if it's not, then it's not Marxism. Feminism is exactly this, the classes are "Male" and "Female" and like all Marxist ideologies it lambastes the "oppressor" class as subhuman and innately evil. The overwhelming majority of feminists are socialist\communist because of this. Feminism is an extension of Marxism into the gender space. Far left" and "Marxism" are not synonymous. …
/r/MensRights20/02/19 12:03 PM
2

It's just normal Feminism, they hate men more than everything so they're using they're hatred of men to earn virtue signalling points.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 11:43 AM
2

That's a good viewpoint to have I think.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 08:26 PM
1

Maybe now I can focus even more on my games development As someone who's also working in their spare time making a game, I wish you the best with this, it's quite a slog.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 07:30 PM
13

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ix5-jqQYU1M You can thank Feminism for the Duluth Model which defines the Male Perpetrator/Female Victim viewpoint of Domestic Violence serving as a basis for the sexist "Violence Against Women Act".
/r/MensRights19/02/19 06:16 PM
1

Not really, in fact Marx himself actually had proto-feminist Victoria Woodhull expelled from the first international for (among other things) her excessive focus on sex and bourgeois women's issues to the detriment of class struggle. This doesn't mean it's not a Marxist movement, it just means it wasn't core to the current objective. Feminism (the kind that most are familiar with in Anglophone countires at any rate) is a liberal movement, explicitly. It's a far left view point, it's Marxism, the…
/r/MensRights19/02/19 06:13 PM
3

Sounds like a pedophile.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 03:16 PM
2

Feminism is a marxist movement.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 03:08 PM
11

The MRM seems highly conservative because the left has abandoned all respect for men in exchange for man-hating Feminism. If you don't hate men the right is your only choice (an imperfect choice I know, but undeniably better than the anti-male left).
/r/MensRights14/02/19 03:07 PM
1

Apparently you also have to be a Jihad supporting terrorist.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 03:03 PM
1

I think you might be retarded and not at all skeptical
/r/MensRights13/10/18 09:55 PM
5

Just meet less hairy poets.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 02:03 AM
4

All this would do is keep the good men who follow the law inside. It basically says "Stay inside this is women and criminal time"
/r/MensRights02/10/18 02:02 AM
1

Skeptical Bob: "Women work less hours, in less dangerous jobs, are less willing to take unwanted shifts but they should like totally get just as much pay as men do!" Talk about entitlement.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 02:01 AM
1

Lol at pay gap “myth”. Read some labor economics instead of manworld be angry nonsense. Ah you've outed yourself as a complete retard sipping the feminist koolaid. Men to tend to work the nightshift more than women: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/flex.pdf (See Table 4) Notice how Men work more Night Shift hours in every category, then look at Evening shifts and notice an even greater difference with men working more hours than women. These night shifts pay more. Why? Because they wear down …
/r/MensRights02/10/18 02:00 AM
8

Right because if Men have a 9PM curfew the few percentage of men who are bad actors will totally obey it. This works just as well as "Gun Free Zones" only those law abiding individuals will comply (the good men in this case) and the bad actors will ignore the rule and go right on ahead and do their thing. Oh and know they'd be free to rape and pillage with far fewer witnesses, not to mention a much smaller risk of getting stopped by someone capable of fighting them.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:55 AM
2

Are you dense enough not to realize trans people have brains closer to that of the opposite sex and that's why they prefer the opposite pronoun? I am well aware of the fact that trans people have a mental illness. Note that your claim here explicitly makes "Gender fluid" people impossible. "It’s unlikely that gender identity has such a straightforward biological explanation, however, and some studies have identified features of the transgender brain that appear closer to the natal sex, casting d…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:51 AM
1

I can point to more feminists complaining about the A.C. and the fact that men sit with their legs apart than I can any opposing the male draft. You find me a feminist opposing the draft, I'll find you 10 that hate the fact that men sit with their legs apart (How DARE men have testicles!).
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:44 AM
2

When women (which obviously almost never happens, thus why we totally shouldn't have men's DV Shelters) abuse it's clearly 'because they're victims' the same excuse used to get out of murdering your husband 'he abused me' usually accepted on emotional argument alone.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:43 AM
1

Affirmative Action occurs in everywhere from business to education. There's a difference between 'stopping a company from discrimination' and legalizing and encouraging it as a practice. Affirmative Action does the latter.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:40 AM
1

The women that last get it. In modern workplaces if women are doing poorly then they just scream sexism, clearly success is sexist if women can't do it so "LOWER THE STANDARDS!!!" The women that got their without merit don't last, aren't happy, and wash out. Or they complain to HR and use their cries of sexism to ruin men's lives while seeking a payout. We could make society a lot better if we acknowledge Affirmative Action as discrimination and outlawed it.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:39 AM
1

Just admit you're a man-hating feminist and we can agree to disagree. You're clearly donning some serious ideological blinders. Women have always used Men to get what they want. "Prostitution is the oldest profession" after all.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:37 AM
2

tl;dr You linked an anti-male faux research paper from a feminist professor who believes in known myths like the gender pay gap (Talk about entitlement, why should women earn equal pay when they work less hours in less difficult and less dangerous jobs?). Said paper clearly has no idea what entitlement even means. Turns out that Feminists write shitty papers, go figure.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:36 AM
2

Using the words "good evidence" loosely I see. The study is highly flawed and completely invalid. The study was also perpetrated by a feminist she's also listed as an "Expert on gender" a make-believe feminist title at her university, making the study political and worth nothing. For instance, lead author Emily Grijalva, PhD, assistant professor of organization and human resources, notes the lack of women in senior roles of leadership could be influenced by disparities in perceptions of feminini…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:33 AM
1

The person in question simply pointed out that Riley was male because of his DNA, you called said individual "transphobic". Why is DNA transphobic?
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:01 AM
2

Political correctness shouldn't eliminate truth.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:00 AM
1

Why should we define human sex according to 0.0000125% of the population rather than the other 99.9999875% whom are healthy and have binary sex characteristics, those who are able to reproduce and aren't at risk for debilitating illness as a result. Why should we define human sex according to genetic failures when people with said failures: Cannot reproduce as their sex organs are non-functional. Naturally speaking nature has removed them from the gene pool. They are the ultimate failures of the…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 12:59 AM
1

Laws only apply to men, women are clearly a superior class.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:11 AM
1

Remove affirmative action and accept it as discrimination, then we can be 100% sure the people who get the job deserve it.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:10 AM
1

I have been a computer programmer, fire fighter, paramedic and a nurse. What I've found is that women in predominantly male fields have different mentality than the general population of women. They are in those fields because they want to be. They have the passion and drive. They aren't easily offended, and often give a good ribbing as well as they can take it. I work with a female doctor that is a former marine and have found her to be just one of the guys. Just my 2 pence. Eh, it depends on h…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:09 AM
38

Because women are always the victim. Feminism 101.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:05 AM
-1

If you have a Y chromosome you are a man. I suggest you look into Sex-Determining Region Y. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of biology. Genetics are not "new", and even if by your definition of "new" they were then new science - with it's superior methods - would invalidate old results. Again, cutting off your penis and playing dressup (as Riley has done, not his giant adams apple) does not and never will make you a woman.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:05 AM
13

Nothing says "equality" like "Give me a job because I have a vagina".
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:01 AM
8

Feminism has fought to ensure this, let us not forget how they attacked Erin Pizzey (founder of the first battered women's shelter) for the high crime of wanting to open a shelter for battered men.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:00 AM
3

In Feminism men are not human, they are oppressors. Why would someone viewed as subhuman be given human rights like due process?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:59 AM
2

Feminism has an ideology that labels men and boys as subhuman. Tradcons may have their prescriptions for how they think men and boys should act but Feminism deliberately and intentionally fights to ensure male suffering.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:58 AM
1

Emmeline Pankhurst. The draft is still here, feminists didn't oppose it, maybe less than 1% of 1% of feminists did. For every feminist who fought against the draft (most out of a fear it would one day apply to women) there were 10 that fought for male enslavement via the draft.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:55 AM
16

I have many close loving relationships with women. I should have said that many women feel entitled in a large part because society gives them privileges i.e. avoiding the draft (devaluing male lives as supported by feminists like Emmeline Pankhurst), guaranteed custody, etc. There is no Office on Men's health but there is an Office on Women's Health yet women live years longer. There is no White House Council on Men and Boys (all petitions have been repeatedly denied) yet there is one for Women…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:54 AM
3

Feminist organization NOW (National Organization for Women) fights against default shared parenting keeping children from their fathers. http://archive.is/DSVrA You are objectively wrong, they changed it because they believe women are never capable of violence. They view violence as something inherently male. Feminism is a hate movement.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:50 AM
2

Feminist organization NOW (National Organization for Women) fights against default shared parenting keeping children from their fathers. http://archive.is/DSVrA Feminists changed it because they viewed all men as thuggish abusers and women as perfect innocent victims.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:49 AM
1

This has been around for millenia, and has been pushed by Tradcons since forever. Feminists are very much split on this issue, and I challenge you to name one case where a feminist has been responsible for a law about MGM. 100% tradcon. Feminists do not view men and boys as people. Any complaint by men is "whining" 100% feminism. Feminists will shut down any discussion of Mens Rights. Education is traditionally women's work. Another tradcon victory, although I will admit that feminism had a hand…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:48 AM
1

Feminism is the root cause of Men's issues. It fights endlessly to preserve them. Tradcons may have backward ideology but they've learned that they can't force it on men. Feminism doesn't view men and boys as people. Their ideology casts men and boys as subhuman oppressors.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:32 AM
64

Exactly the type of person whom Twitter loves to give the blue checkmark to. Twitter approved.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:30 AM
2

There’s been campaigns and awareness, though limited, to get men to open up emotionally for the betterment of our mental health and to decrease the suicide rate. Absolutely not. The most that has been paid to men is lip service. Feminism has done nothing but attack men for being human.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:28 AM
10

If a man has emotions he's guilty and a child. If a man doesn't have emotions he's a sociopath. It's being a man that's unacceptable to these people.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:27 AM
4

Except you know, all the ones that voted for Trump who will completely elated. It's almost like women aren't a fucking hivemind.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:25 AM
31

A womanchild got arrested because she couldn't act like a grown adult. To attack the cops (like she did) is absurd.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:23 AM
3

You are undeniably wrong.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:23 AM
3

You're absurdly incorrect.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:22 AM
14

Maybe grown adults shouldn't act like children.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:21 AM
22

Exposure absolutely helps the cause. It brings to light the fact that women feel entitled to being treated as a special class.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:20 AM
2

Why is DNA transphobic? Is reality offensive when it doesn't suit your mental illness?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:18 AM
1

Sex change is impossible. DNA is permanent. If Riley were to take a DNA test he would 100% with absolutely zero doubt come back as male.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:18 AM
1

Or it's because Riley is a man and the person is simply using science as it is applied. Riley Dennis is a man, will always be a man, and their DNA will always be the same. A man without a penis is a man, a man with low testosterone is a man. I'm sorry but you can't "transition" from Male to Female it's a scientific impossibility with our current technology.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:17 AM
1

It is impossible to change sex. DNA is permanent. The day that DNA becomes "Transphobic" is the day that the human race is over.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:14 AM
5

I think you need to get over yourself. Someone pointing out reality (That a man is always a man, no matter what he thinks he is) is not "Transphobic" A) It in no way insinuates fear. B) It is in no way irrational. I don't think you know what phobia means.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:13 AM
1

In what way is referring to trans people by their actual sex an "irrational fear"?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:12 AM
2

The idea is that women cannot be abusive and that abuse is inherently a male trait.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:11 AM
2

It's weird how they struggle to use that word when it comes to Men isn't it? Almost like they don't want to acknowledge male victims of Rape.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 03:03 PM
2

Good bot
/r/MensRights29/09/18 04:14 AM
3

It just gets better: https://imgur.com/a/O49hhgi "Forced sexual activity isn't sex. It can't be sex because sex, by definition, is consensual." So "Unwanted Sex" is an oxymoron, and yet that's the term you use to describe male victims of Rape.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 03:57 AM
3

The program also forces the typical falsehoods and inflated statics (the known false 1-in-5 stats). Here are the stats from the Bureau of Justice Statistics: [1] Attempted Rape is incredibly low for students and non-students in the most vulnerable age group. "For the period 1995–2013, females ages 18 to 24 not enrolled in a post-secondary school were 1.2 times more likely to experience rape and sexual assault victimization (7.6 per 1,000), compared to students in the same age range (6.1 per 1,00…
/r/MensRights29/09/18 03:19 AM
1

And to be fair I don't even think the comics I've read of his are really that good, most of them (with the exception of the circumcision ones) seem kind of poorly done, like the guy can draw but has kind-of childish levels of humor. More of an edge lord than a serious political commentator. I have relatives who died fighting Nazis calling some cartoonist you might think is an idiot a nazi just doesn't seem right, unless he's actually advocating for the extinction/oppression of Jews (at which cas…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:22 PM
1

ah well, here's another anti semitic comic by him. you'll notice that the character in the 2nd and 3rd panels is the only character drawn with a nose, counting basically all his stonetoss comics. Anti-semitic how? Are big nose jokes illegal now? Are jews above humor? Apparently drawing a jew with a big nose makes you a Nazi, didn't realize comedy was equivalent to putting people in gas chambers. If racial jokes make you a nazi, then you're going to have to draw and quarter just about every comed…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:07 PM
1

Again, I haven't seen any evidence of this. The only citation I've seen is a verbatim copy of the terminator movie scene, literally no one has provided any evidence that supports such a claim. Why is it so hard to cite your evidence if you're so adamant it's true? You must have something really damning to be filled with such conviction, so why don't you share it?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:47 PM
1

Yeah how dare I suggest women are equal, lol silly me.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:15 AM
8

Fair point, I guess what I’m trying to say is it’s kind of like slut shaming: women are usually the target, but both women and men perpetuate/partake in the practice. But in this case it's almost constantly women who are getting asked "Do you want to circumcise". I'm not saying "Ignore the men pushing the practice" (i.e. Kellogs may he eat a bag of dicks) I'm just saying that these women have the power to make the right choice and should feel obligated to do so. I don't think saying "Hey you car…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:15 AM
1

So because mommy hurt you, you gotta hate all women Less than 30% of the world is circumcised, I don't hate "all women" I don't even hate the ones who make the choice, I do however hate their choice and want them to accept responsibility so they can make better ones. Apparently wanting women to make better choices means I hate them, news to me. Wanna fix it? Go educate instead of acting like this towards people who already disagree with circumcision. I'm educating you right now, I'm teaching tha…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:07 AM
1

You really like twisting words. The original point was that women arent the root of circumcision and that it's only around due to old outdated customs. Nothing about women's choice making. Of course women aren't the root, it was originally a religious custom, but women are perpetuating it and that perpetuation needs to stop. The women are the ones primarily making these decisions about baby boys and it's that reason that they need to be held accountable, they have to realize the significance of …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:41 AM
3

You agreed with his initial post (the post you replied to initially) in which he abdicated women of their responsibility because "peer pressure" and "everyone is doing it". Are women strong and independent individuals responsible for their choices, or are they meek and pathetic individuals with no will of their own? You seem to support the latter, I support the former.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:26 AM
3

I guess if you were an idiot you could claim that women aren't primarily the ones making the choice. More kids are born to single mother homes than not, I suppose you think the father is telepathically implanting his view in her head?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:20 AM
10

Both fathers and mothers are likely to go along with this norm if they haven’t thought it through though, even more so if it’s done for religious reasons... Fathers tend to be victims themselves, mothers are not. Religious isn't the most cited reason in the U.S. it's statements like "Cleanliness" and the like.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:18 AM
5

The reality that universally women are the one's to be asked about decisions regarding the baby. Men are given next to no say in the matter, and men who assert themselves into the situation are often viewed extremely negatively (though that shouldn't stop them from using their voice). Factor in all the single mother homes as a result of the "Women need a man like a fish needs a bicycle" narrative and you have the obvious outcome.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:14 AM
2

The comic doesn't have to say "This is the only way circumcision occurs and there are no other causes". The rhetoric speaks for itself. No, that's your faulty inference of the comic at fault. It is an absolute fact that women are the majority of decision makers regarding circumcision and that there is a gap in the understanding of consent. Seeking to close this gap isn't "bad rhetoric" it's absolutely necessary to saving baby boys from future torture at the hands of said individuals. Nothing abs…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:42 AM
1

You're right, but I'm not an expert in word choice at times.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:10 AM
5

Absolutely true, you also have the issue that the rampant anti-male sexism in schools (the chief cause of girls getting inflated grades) has a negative impact on males and results in them getting unfair marks.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:04 AM
4

It often involves teaching young boys that they should hate themselves and that manhood is inherently bad so yes absolutely.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:03 AM
6

Farewell, humiliating your bigoted way of thinking was the goal.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:02 AM
2

Sure. But again. The problem with circumcision isn't women. This comic very clearly focuses the blame on women. No, the comic focuses the blame on hypocrisy, it's women making the decision in the comic because it's women making the decision in reality. Women need to understand and take responsibility. That's not what I'm doing at all. I'm literally listing reasons parents decide to have their kids circumcised. That's it. I agree that if a woman does it for that reason, she's just as much respons…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:00 AM
3

Apparently it's oppression to not listen to bad music.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:49 AM
3

It's about time someone does something about this Title IX catastrophe.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:47 AM
17

In Feminist ideology Men and boys are not people they are subhuman oppressors. How can anyone sympathy/empathy for "oppressors"? This was the Feminist goal since the get-go.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:38 AM
58

This comic is merely calling out hypocrisy surrounding circumcision and the issue of bodily consent. It's not "Demonizing women" it's pointing out a gap in their thinking one that is actively hurting baby boys. This is a situation which must be stopped in order to eliminate circumcision and give people the right to be upset about the trauma forced upon them.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:36 AM
2

You're hilarious, you need serious help as you have a serious case of Trump Derangement System. Obama wasn't terrible but I have my complaints. I think Trump is living in your head rent free, you need to take a breather.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:32 AM
5

Where did I say they weren't responsible for their own actions? I said that it's not just women who are doing this so to reduce the issue and focus the blame solely on them isn't a good tactic. No one said that we should reduce the issue and focus blame solely on them. We should however hold them responsible and show them the hypocrisy of their ways, which is exactly what this cartoon is doing. Sure. Lots of women are indifferent and do it because their husband wants them too. Here you are again…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:31 AM
1

Hows it feel to agree with someone who says women have a right to mutilate the bodies of their children and that they're not responsible for their own actions because "peer pressure". You people make women sound pathetic.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:22 AM
9

Why would you not want to attempt to employ empathy for progress rather than persecuting women? What exactly do you want to do, jail mothers? Give them tickets? You realize the healthcare employees are the ones doing the snipping, right? Like the one doctor up in michigan who was arrested for "circumcising" vulvas. And it's women asking them to do it, giving them the ability to do so. Not surprised you went to something as traumatizing as rape as your first defence since cocks can mutilate vulva…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:21 AM
6

How does any of this erase the fact that women are responsible for their choices? You by your own words said women aren't responsible because "peer pressure" and "everyone is doing it". You know that's disgusting, you know that women are responsible for their choices, you just don't want women to ever face equality.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:09 AM
6

The thing you have to remember is that Men and Boys are victims of this form of abuse, women are not. As victims of said abuse men often take defensive stances, they don't want to believe their mothers hurt them. Women are the primary decision makers in this process and that is why this is an issue, the comic is highlighting the fact that women claim to care about consent but as soon as it comes to strapping a baby boy down to a table and cutting pieces off him off as he writhes and screams in a…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:07 AM
3

It's not deflective. It's a super reasonable critique. It is not reasonable to say that women aren't responsible for their own actions because of peer pressure or because "everyone is doing it" that is incredibly reductive, not to mention incredibly bigoted against Men and Boys. This comic is exactly the same thing. There are tons of parents, both mom's and dad's, who get their child circumcised for a variety of reasons from religion to misinformation to tradition. This comic is framing it as th…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:05 AM
3

English is a living language No, English is a language with defined terms and meanings. Making up words is something children do, you are an adult though you choose to act like a child. and "please stop" demonizing women in the name of progress for men. Again, no one is demonizing women, women who circumcise their sons are engaging in evil behavior and should be ashamed of that. Women are adults responsible for their actions. Women who circumcise are responsible for their actions, the women who …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:02 AM
5

You agree with /u/servicemaster and they wrote: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9cohy8/rules_for_thee_but_not_for_me/e5cpss3 When is the last time a man gave birth out of his cock? Never? Then it seems women do have a right to what happens to their baby after it is created and then pushed out of them. They believe woman have the right to mutilate their children in any way they want, you clearly agree to that or you seriously need to reconsider whom you tell "I was agreeing with you"
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:57 AM
10

Your this/that, black/white attitude is detrimental to progress unless you have a fucking gun. Do you have a gun? Are you ready to shoot a deflective cunt over this? No? Then calm the fuck down. You have that same attitude, it's also rather ironic as your hatred of white people is clearly "black/white". When is the last time a man gave birth out of his cock? Never? Then it seems women do have a right to what happens to their baby after it is created and then pushed out of them. Wow, you are a mo…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:55 AM
1

Holy shit you need to breathe. The clitoral hood is homologous to the foreskin - both share the same relative function. I would absolutely agree that male circumcision is far more destructive, but it's about relative function on the body - both are there to protect the external organ and neither should be removed. I'm disengaging with you as you need a serious time out. Have a good day, and remember that you will never in any circumstance get people on our side with this approach.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:49 AM
12

Lmao USA's at 71% my guy, that's still pretty fucking high. Yes it is, and that's despicable. That's still less than 1/3rd of all circumcision. I was merely refuting your point that it's a "white" thing. Race is clearly not the controlling factor - ideology is. Contextually, in the USA, it is from puritan white men. In the U.S. it's from puritans yes, it's also from women who make statements like "It's cleaner" or "It looks better", women who force their views onto the bodies of their sons. Wome…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:45 AM
4

I wasn’t even referring to the terminator comic. Where did I mention that comic? Sorry I got you mixed up with the other guy. I have just seen much of Stonetoss’s work in the past, and he has plenty of source material to make that conclusion with. In your opinion maybe, but you are a biased individual. Taking someone's comical work and digging through it to find evidence to claim they're a nazi is more indicative of your desire for them to be a nazi rather than their actual nazi status. Again, i…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:29 AM
2

Incorrect. The left and right vestibules and the corpus cavernosum exist in the left and right walls of the vagina. The penis and the clitoris are not the same. Homologous - having the same relative position, value, or structure Relative equivalence does not equate to being exactly the same, if they were exactly the same there would be no term differentiation and they would both share a common definition. I never claimed they were exactly the same, I claimed they were homologous and they undenia…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:21 AM
3

The Trump administration is routinely giving that amount to staffers who leave, provided they sign an NDR and keep their mouth shut It's interesting how you paint this as a trump thing. Also it was a job offer, I agree that these people get payed too much but the Clintons and Obamas are still raking in money for speaking to rich billionaires. Hillary Clinton averages ~$225,000/speech and made 3 of them to Goldman Sachs in a single year. Again, you're being very disingenuous, I'd suggest you take…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:11 AM
5

It has a long history, and hasn't been popular in Christianity really, it's largely a Jewish/Muslim tradition. It's largely regarded as an Old Testament tradition rather than a New Testament one.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:49 AM
1

You forgot to mention domestic violence laws another instance where discrimination is actually enshrined in law. Although I don't know how bad it is in the U.K. relative to the U.S.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:44 AM
-6

Jesus dude, what are you talking about? All I said was that Stonetoss is not ashamed to be a supporter of Hitler and Nazi ideologies; Yes, you called someone a nazi - trivializing nazi-ism in the process - because a man drew a terminator cartoon, you then misidentified the nazi salute. that is a fact, not up for debate or condescending remarks toward me. Everything is up for debate we live in a free country, another word of advice: Don't attempt to denounce debate and 'declare' what's truth as t…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:42 AM
26

There's a very real puritan propaganda agenda from white men No. The highest rates of circumcision occur in non-white countries: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772313/ Here's a link to just the table of countries and their prevalence: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772313/table/Tab1/?report=objectonly From Wikipedia: In 2007, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that globally, the vast majority of men who are circumcised are Muslims. They estimated 33% of a…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:39 AM
3

I'm awful because this one comment I made didnt also state how I disagree with other super feminist movements just for you to see. Right. No you're awful because you agreed with the parent comment which says that women aren't at fault for their choices because of peer pressure and bandwagon fallacies.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:37 AM
-7

No, he legitimately is an unabashed fascist lmao You seem to have no capacity to think critically so I'm going to terminate this conversation. Word of advice: If you don't even know what the Nazi salute looks like don't abuse it's identification, it's a serious issue and when you trivialize it you do far more for the Nazis than you think.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:36 AM
11

Circumcision is predominantly white and based in religion No. The highest rates of circumcision occur in non-white countries: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772313/ Here's a link to just the table of countries and their prevalence: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772313/table/Tab1/?report=objectonly From Wikipedia: In 2007, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that globally, the vast majority of men who are circumcised are Muslims. They estimated 33% of adul…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:35 AM
5

That is a scene from the terminator, and the Nazi salute requires the arm to be straight up and out - not bent. If THAT'S your evidence for someone being a nazi then you are seriously deranged.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:23 AM
2

Weird, Kellogs the person who originally made Circumcision popular though that it reduced sensitivity and would stop males from masturbating...
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:21 AM
6

Foreskin and a clitoris are completely different. If you think that's false you've clearly never been near one. Actually the clitoris is homologous to the penis, and it also has foreskin. "Female Circumcision" (The WHO definition) is removal of the clitoral hood (the clitoral foreskin). You need to read a biology book.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:20 AM
9

I want you to cut a huge portion of the nerve endings out of your finger and tell me your finger still feels the same. Also Kellogs the original person to push Circumcision in the U.S. did so in order to prevent boys from masturbating, so you know the reduction of sensitivity was LITERALLY the intent.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:18 AM
5

Sex is the same ​No it isn't, you're missing thousands of nerve endings. maybe easier to clean? It's not easier to clean either, it's literally exactly the same. Did you just ignore all science ever presented to you?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:16 AM
4

Again, It doesn't just leave you with "different-looking genitalia" it causes permanent changes in the brain: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage And it makes you feel violated just as rape does.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:16 AM
6

But circumcision would just leave you with different-looking genitalia depending on the culture. I’m not really sure how you could possibly equate the two. Circumcision is done without anesthesia in most cases, and the trauma causes changes in the brain: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage Not to mention having your genitalia altered without your permission can violate your feelings of agency, and make you feel as though your body i…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:14 AM
7

Ah your convenience tops all the boys who lose their penis, not to mentions the ones who die. Thanks for clarifying that.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:11 AM
13

Solidarity.. I'm glad mine was chopped too, and I'm glad I'm with the norm in Caucasian U.S. society having a dick that matches my fellow race. To me at least uncircumcised dicks are just fuckin weird af. I don't know what's worse here, the weird racism or the fact that you seem to have an obsession with the way other people's genitals look.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:10 AM
14

Tbh In my own opinion I prefer my circumsized penis over what I would have had. And I'm glad it was done before I could remember it. Female victims often say the same thing, I know you won't accept it now but I'm sorry you went through that.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:09 AM
11

This is a winnable fight, and is central to getting boys recognized as human beings whose pain matters.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:08 AM
1

This is a winnable fight, and is central to getting boys recognized as human beings whose pain matters.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:08 AM
6

Uh no? Can we stop acting like children and calling everyone we disagree with a nazi? Thanks.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:07 AM
5

I'm female and super against circumcision. My boyfriend wont do it if I insist but doesn't see the issue himself. My point is many women are agai st it and many men are for it, so why demonize a woman for your point? This isnt men's rights so much as it's against women. Many men are for it because they have been mutilated and don't want to believe their parents hurt them, what is womens excuse? Apparently violating consent is okay if it's "Peer pressure", what a sick couple of individuals you ar…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:06 AM
21

Why is it we can't fight for men's rights in any shape or form without demonizing women? Why can't we ever criticize people's hypocrisy without someone coming in here yelling about how women are a protected class immune from criticism? Honest question. Most moms I talked with either did it because everyone else has been doing it and/or the hospital pressured her. Oh so if you get pressured into something you're no longer accountable, how interesting, I didn't realize women were pathetic and had …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter