TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FunkyJ121 Archive

View 10 posts and 194 comments by FunkyJ121 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1539

DiscriminationFunkyJ121/r/MensRights02/06/21 02:00 PM
344

Anti-MRMFunkyJ121/r/MensRights02/07/21 11:15 AM
167

FunkyJ121/r/AntiFeminists15/07/21 01:19 PM
82

FunkyJ121/r/AntiFeminists07/09/21 05:03 PM
45

ProgressFunkyJ121/r/MensRights04/08/22 02:20 PM
36

Social IssuesFunkyJ121/r/MensRights15/05/21 10:11 PM
3

DiscriminationFunkyJ121/r/MensRights31/07/21 06:47 PM
2

HealthFunkyJ121/r/MensRights15/05/22 04:31 PM
1

DiscriminationFunkyJ121/r/MensRights23/01/22 01:11 PM
1

Social IssuesFunkyJ121/r/MensRights07/06/22 11:38 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

They've made all of reddit "women subs." Twice in recent history there have been cases where someone on a gender neutral sub will say "things are so bad as a woman" to which I said "it's not like men don't have issues too." People actually started telling me I can't talk about men's issues because it's off topic, but the topics were issues in the US, not women's issues. They are so blind in their zealotry, they really believe only women can have issues.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 10:18 AM
1

Congrats on being multi-lingual. I'm learning some new languages too. What's your primary language?
/r/MensRights23/03/23 09:19 PM
12

Deadliest causes of death is redundant since there aren't varying degrees of death, something either is dead or not. I think you mean "leading causes of death?" In which case it's not even in the top 10
/r/MensRights23/03/23 09:07 PM
13

Deadliest cause of death? OK..
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:04 PM
19

FGM is illegal throughout most of the world. MGM is legal in every country
/r/MensRights10/03/23 07:30 PM
16

Boundaries are important in every healthy relationship, whether it be intimate or platonic or otherwise.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 10:42 PM
56

"Equality feels like oppression to the privileged."
/r/MensRights09/03/23 05:23 PM
-1

Because government agencies, corporate shills and bots upvote/downvote content while also creating narratives so that people are more divided and don't band together to end tyranny. A lot of the interaction on reddit is fake.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 01:07 PM
38

Account has disappeared
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/23 01:20 PM
80

How is this a pussy pass denied? Accusations don't mean justice
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/23 06:48 PM
7

Then says in the next paragraph that she's afraid to express her feminist opinions because women will bash her. Hmm..
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 04:39 PM
13

Along with your last point. Some countries like USA and UK do not report "made to penetrate" in their rape statistics. In the UK, rape is only recognized by the law as forcible penetration. In the US, the statistics on raped by forceful penetration are simply omitted.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 02:19 PM
2

I'm a dude and it sounds like you think I'm a chick. You have some serious hatred of women. I'm here as an anti-feminist, not a woman hater
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/22 04:04 AM
1

Why are you escalating this to violence?
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/22 12:43 AM
4

Men and women are equal. Your meme is creating a false dichotomy that egalitarians don't hold people accountable to their actions
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/22 06:23 PM
1

That's literally what I said. how can you disagree and say the same thing, just longer?
/r/MensRights06/12/22 11:56 PM
9

As someone who was genuinely excited for Avatar 2, I no longer will see the movie. Was going to go to the box office, now I won't even pirate that shit. Fuck James Cameron.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 02:36 PM
2

Email address listed in photo! Fyi. Comment on the right portion of photo lists instructions for yall
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/22 04:32 PM
13

Huh? I was pretty clear where I stand so you'll have to be more specific as well as include the relevance to the conversation
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/22 03:04 PM
13

Hey, not all of us leftists are feminists. I'm an egalitarian like any non brainwashed leftist
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/22 02:41 PM
2

Lmao a simp is a woman's walking mat, I've seen simps go for ugly chicks too. Its called shallow
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/22 01:33 PM
2

I don't disagree. Just that if that's the only quality someone cares about, then they are shallow. "I just want a gf who's not fat" would suggest weight is all the person cares about
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/22 04:22 AM
2

Right. And the meme is about finding a gf. If physical attraction is the only quality you seek in one, you're shallow.
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/22 03:52 AM
1

Then the meme should say that, otherwise it just makes us anti feminists look bad
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 09:34 PM
-3

If thats all someone cares about that makes them shallow too. I get the point of OP's meme, but without fleshing it out more it actually does paint the person as shallow
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 07:02 PM
-6

I'm pointing out that if it's the only preference then they are shallow. There's more to people than just weight. It's fine to not be attracted to fat people. So if they're skinny, but feminist, you'd be ok with dating them cause they're skinny? I think not.
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 06:03 PM
1

If the only trait someone cares about is whether they are obese or not, the person is shallow. Doesn't matter the gender.
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 06:00 PM
-15

If you only care about their weight, it kind of is fat shaming. Are you that shallow?
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 04:55 PM
4

The oligarchs benefit cause they can keep the poors in-fighting about the best form of egalitarianism instead of realizing it's a class struggle.
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 04:53 PM
3

the world needs egalitarianism, not separate equality movements. It was not the "black rights movement" it was the "Civil Rights Movement." People can and should speak-up about what they are knowledgeable about, but dividing the people of the equality movement is only going to divide them, not help the cause
/r/MensRights12/11/22 07:18 PM
6

The people have such a dismantled public education system, dismantled democracy, dismantled fiscal policies and shit work-life balance; they have no idea what they want. The top saw where they can divide and conquer so they drove their wedges. For-profit media does not care for the truth or what people want, but rather only care about the money pouring-in for spreading lies.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 12:49 PM
1

We should just migrate to r/egalitarianism and be the ones to stop the gender division
/r/MensRights11/11/22 12:40 PM
5

Not necessarily created by, but certainly perpetuated by
/r/MensRights11/11/22 12:37 PM
7

The "rich people" are so rich in the class struggle that even millionaires are poor. I don't hate millionaires, though I wish they would realize they are one of the poors and help the cause. I hate the ruling class of hundred-billionaires (have near or over $100billion) who are controlling narratives, elections, legislation, education, culture war.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 12:37 PM
1

I agree with everything but the veering left of reddit and the conflation of veering left with feminism. I consider myself farther left than any US politician and feminism has nothing to do with the communism/capitalism axis. Modern "progressives" (and really most of the population) of the US are so brainwashed by 100 years of McCarthyism, Red Scare tactics and corporate crony-capitalism, that they have little brainpower left to think about anything outside of the narrative their party prescribe…
/r/MensRights05/11/22 11:43 AM
13

With things like the EU's DSA and the FBI calling incels a radical terrorist group, how long until we are labeled radical terrorists spreading disinformation because we use empirical data that goes against woke culture? ​ Please, EU people reading this: Stop your politicians from deciding what is fact and what facts can be spoken freely. Our group could be in jeopardy depending on who writes the laws and/or enforces them.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:07 PM
5

Egalitarianism literally comes from the French for "equality for all" and encompasses gender, race, creed, age, physicality and mentality (although I'm not quite sure about the wording of the last two). The best thing we can do to ensure everyone has equal rights is to practice egalitarianism, call it such and correct feminists who would use a gender-specific term for equality.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 01:35 PM
11

By lightly stretching the skin over long periods, it undergoes mitosis. The stretching can be accomplished with hands or devices. While this process does grow new foreskin, it doesn't regrow the frenulum, ridged band or nerve endings lost through MGM. A restored foreskin in conjunction with retraining the skin forward, over the glans, will gradually restore the mucous membranes and the glans will shed the callous. Reported sensitivity greatly increases at this stage, known as dekaratanization or…
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:22 PM
7

Thanks. I could tell with your first comment you meant no ill-will, just wanted to use it as a teachable moment.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 03:33 PM
7

For starters, the inner foreskin has about 20k fine touch nerve endings removed during MGM, often the frenulum (the most sensitive part of male genitalia) is entirely removed. The exposure of the glans causes the mucous membranes to dry out and the glans to callous, leading to further desensitization. In some individuals, this means daily pain when the glans does not callous. In the US, the foreskins are sold to lotion companies for a billion dollar market. much more info here
/r/MensRights02/10/22 03:13 PM
16

I agree with everything you said, just want to point out a little tidbit. Research suggests that penises that are cut tend to be shorter because the penis does not have the extra skin to grow into. Many men who have restored or are restoring (myself included) notice their penises grow as they regrow their foreskin because the inner tissues are no longer forced inside.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 03:07 PM
4

Some people who are "skinny" can have high levels of visceral fat. Especially those who live sedentary lifestyles with high cholesterol diets. Just spreading some helpful, relevant information
/r/AntiFeminists04/09/22 02:30 PM
-2

I'm a firm believer visceral fat proves beauty in not merely skin deep. It takes work and dedication to care for one's health and outward beauty. It's only shallow to care about outward beauty when that's all someone cares about.
/r/AntiFeminists04/09/22 11:50 AM
1

A doctor likely won't have the tools to measure visceral fat. Some might have an electrode fat measuring device, which you can buy for personal use in scales under $100. This method is not the most accurate, but effective. The most likely place to find an accurate measurement (through water displacement measuring) is going to be a university. Some do it for free so they can train their students, but some are paid.
/r/AntiFeminists04/09/22 11:48 AM
2

Because its accepted by the medical community, baby foreskins can be used in "cruelty free" products
/r/MensRights03/09/22 05:12 PM
12

There was plenty of pain for me until I started my restoration. Some of us have what the medical community refers to as a "botched circumcision." All genital mutilation is barbaric
/r/MensRights02/09/22 01:21 PM
1

FBI only considers rape for their statistics if the person was penetrated against their will.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:08 PM
-8

Good bot
/r/MensRights30/07/22 02:51 PM
13

Was going to say exactly this! Since they are listening to mostly pop music, almost everything is written by people behind the scenes, not the artist. Billie Eillish's brother writes her songs, Katy Perry's music is written and produced by men, Cardi B (a hated member of this community) has male songwriters and producers etc. I really don't listen to pop and couldn't go through all of the female pop artists, but I think y'all get the point
/r/MensRights30/07/22 02:50 PM
4

https://15square.org.uk/circumcised-men/losses-from-circumcision/
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:10 PM
3

Only men are forced into the draft and all men are forced to stay in Ukraine against their will. FBI only considers rape possible if the victim had something inserted against their will, same in UK and many other countries. FGM is illegal in most parts of the world, MGM 0. "Save the women and children" even in modern society, should be "save elderly and children."
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:55 PM
7

Every cut penis is dried and cracked. Imagine having to telling a stranger to think about sex less and they don't perform in bed well. What an illogical assumption. Next I bet you'll call me an incel. Stfu
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:48 PM
4

Have you tried r/foreskin_restoration? I had a painful glans for years and recently started restoring/retaining. It takes years to fully restore coverage and certain parts will not regrow, but glans coverage leads to dekeratinization and subsequent increase in sensation. Before retaining, it was like being right next to a loud racecar then that first retaining was like instantly wearing ear protection. It's been great for myself and others in that sub (and I just started a few months ago), I wou…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:40 PM
11

The approx 15 sq inches of healthy tissue known as foreskin has around 20,000 fine touch nerve endings. It is not only necessary for full sexual satisfaction, it also protects the glans. Without this protection, the glans dries out and callouses, further hampering sexual satisfaction. In some individuals, like myself, the glans does not callous completely and daily pain ensues. After years of pain, I recently discovered foreskin restoration and retention, which have been sweet relief. The first …
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:31 PM
5

Just caught the last line this time around and would like to point out, single parenting is detrimental to children whether it be a single mother or father.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:25 PM
22

"How dare men only think about sex. Pigs." Then the next breath, "you're an incel so your opinion doesn't matter."
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:30 AM
6

Where 85% of the boys' genitals are mutilated, yet are "privileged"
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 11:30 AM
1

Its just a collection of cells with no conscious. There is a huge difference between a fetus in the first trimester and a living, breathing person
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:38 PM
1

And you don't have to join their cause if you do not want. But just as we have told them, "not every man," I must remind you "not every woman." All "us vs them" tactics are used as distraction tools so the ruling class can maintain the status quo without question because everyone is so busy with infighting. That being said I will leave you with this: Advocating for dual-consenting parenting is imo in the best interest of men because it eliminates child support issues, finding out about a pregnan…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:29 PM
1

Because I believe there are rights that men still need recognized by society. As for this issue in particular, I think men have an opportunity to bring about meaningful change to the status quo if we'd stop thinking in terms of "us vs them" and started thinking about the best-case scenario for all peoples.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:02 PM
1

You're correct and society does not consider children's rights nearly as much as they should
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:48 PM
2

Abandoning children causes quantifiable damage to the child and the surrounding society. Ending the development of a collection of cells with no evidenced consciousness is unbeknownst to the fetus and surrounding society.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:31 PM
0

Men nor women should be forced into parenthood. No child should be raised by parents that do not want it. Nobody should be happy the ruling class is gradually stripping more rights from the people. Men would do best to find a solution to the "abortion problem" that reduces unwanted pregnancies for men and women. With population running amok, and the obvious damages done to children with single parents: higher rates of suicide, mental illness, crime, teenage pregnancy, poverty, etc; limiting the …
/r/MensRights26/06/22 09:45 PM
-5

This thread is all about men wanting to abandon children. I'm suggesting a choice for both genders that keeps the child's best wishes in mind. Since that is what reproduction is for, any sensible parent should want what is best for the child even if it means they have to find a different person who is willing to have a child with them.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 09:01 PM
4

That is not damage to the child. I am not talking about the damage that happens to father or mother. I am only talking about damage to the child because the purpose of reproduction is to bring life into the world and that life's rights are not even considered under the current pro-choice discussions. Children without one or both parents are more likely to: live in poverty, underperform in school and work, become addicted to drugs, reproduce as a teenager, be a violent criminal, etc. The humane t…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 04:28 PM
9

Until the abortion discussion includes the evidenced damage of birthing a child who's father does not want it, there will never be equality in abortion. Reproduction is not a right, and those wanting to reproduce should be required to have children with people who want children. Doctors and clinics should be required to abort all fetuses that do not have two loving and committed parents present at the first neonatal check-up.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:38 PM
4

Facebook told me a few years back that it wasn't against their community standards for someone to say "I like baby foreskins in my mouth." This is not news E2A: Link to post I made about it then
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:44 PM
-16

I agree that men should have equal reproductive rights, but your methods completely ignore the effect of abandonment on the child which would be theoretically born. We regularly discuss the need children have for a father in this sub, yet I see constant suggestion to abandon these children when it comes to abortion. Just as a man who wants a child needs to seek out a woman who wants a child, so should a woman have to seek out a man who wants one as well. Unless there are two parents present at t…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:38 PM
61

The same reason feminazis created the term "manspreading," cause they have no idea wtf they are talking about. They want the ability to be able to shut-up any of the opposition very quickly and using a mental-gymnastics term like "mansplain" or "manspread" rudely informs everyone of their mental illness so the man can walk away from this illogic.
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/22 11:39 AM
3

Get off your high horse and learn to love yourself
/r/MensRights20/06/22 12:52 AM
6

Lmao this is the type of shit that needs to stop. I shouldn't be shamed for rubbing one out if I'm horny and my girlfriend is not in the mood or sick or whatever. I have a high sex-drive, which isnt masculine cause women can have high sex-drives too.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 06:21 PM
4

Maybe you don't consider yours mutilation, but mine has hurt daily as long as I can remember. Now that I've started restoring, my orgasms are stronger than I ever thought possible and I'm not even dekeratanized yet. I no longer need death grip and my pain has decreased since starting restoration as well
/r/MensRights19/06/22 04:51 PM
2

The only hard aspect in the US that disadvantages women that I hear is the "pink tax." There is no reason women should be charged a luxury tax on tampons, mentrual cups and/or pads. I hear aspects like gender discrimination, but that effects men too and there is no good way to quantify.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 03:10 PM
4

Surely this is fake?
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 12:59 PM
40

They're all oppressed yet not a single US women is likely victim of genital mutilation while myself and 85% of the US men are. I can't even talk about it to most people cause I get ignored or laughed at. It's literally against the law to mutilate a girl, but not a boy in this country, yet they all say men aren't oppressed.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:41 PM
2

This needs to be pinned at the top of the sub!
/r/MensRights17/06/22 05:05 PM
17

Its called egalitarianism and women aren't the ones who need equal rights. The only tangible inequalities for women is they often have to pay luxury tax on tampons but are free from the draft and have genital protections across the globe. They also: have lower suicide rates, receive lower sentences for the same crimes as men, receive more scholarships to college, granted custody of children far more often even when proven to be an unfit parent, are almost always labeled by MSM as "having sex wit…
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 12:01 PM
-27

Democracy allowed all white men to vote. There were no caveats that only those who served the country could vote. Stop making up shit to fit your narrative. Thats how the pendulum swings too far to one direction. We are not feminazis who make up their own history and reality.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:01 PM
19

Women weren't able to vote, weren't able to speak-up in any public setting, were not allowed to seek education. The list goes on to prove that women were once oppressed. Do not make us appear ignorant by denying the very real history of humanity. Recognize the changes that have been made in our society over the eons so we may learn how to be a better society, but do not dwell in those times. Have women been placed on a pedestal for much of history? Quite possibly, but this is very different than…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 12:29 PM
160

How many more mothers have to kill their sons for the justice system to realize gender has nothing to do with one's ability to care for a child?
/r/MensRights22/05/22 05:06 PM
2

Have you done it? I read that too much tension can cause damage and long/slow method is the safe way. I don't think I would want to use weights or really tug on it all the time, but it already hurts/chafes/too tight erect so can it get worse if I am slow?
/r/MensRights15/05/22 04:41 PM
2

How does that have any relevance to what I have said?
/r/MensRights08/05/22 05:49 PM
2

If the man doesn't want the child, aborted. If the woman doesn't want thw child, aborted. That is equality.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 01:49 PM
-8

"Men should be able to sign off any parental rights." You realize what you're advocating for? We regularly talk about the damage done to children without fathers and then I see this short-sighted stance time and time again. Parenting takes two and as such both should need to consent for the baby to be birthed. No damage can be done to an unborn life, but a lifetime of damage is done to an abandoned child. That damage then has adverse effects throughtout their life on society as a whole. Abortion…
/r/MensRights08/05/22 01:06 PM
3

So its true! This is a monumental day forward in egalitarianism on reddit
/r/AntiFeminists29/04/22 12:01 PM
0

Vaginas and penises are sex organs, boobs are milk organs. They are not the same thing
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:03 PM
13

We should do something like, "Circumcision is Mutilation" or "Men are Human too"
/r/MensRights02/04/22 04:55 PM
17

Not sure if you've seen this, but they literally do no care what the "law" states.
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/22 01:32 PM
23

It was tried and removed. Y'know, as a social experiment. Reddit admins official stance is that "men are not a protected class capable of being harassed."
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/22 12:23 PM
20

Its a common thing. Men and women do it. The dumb shit you thought ended in school only continues through life but with real consequences.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 03:07 PM
13

news shouldn't excite you. It is there to provide nonfiction about current events
/r/MensRights18/02/22 01:32 PM
22

His face at the very end! My reaction every day
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 01:25 PM
2

Suggesting that most women have to deal with creepy men as if they riddle the street is slander. How can men be included in a statistic if they cannot be subject of sexual assault? The British Law states that only women can be sexually assaulted.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:48 PM
2

yup. it is a lot of people. Any number of people over 0 being harassed or assaulted is bad, but hyperbole and slander only make people recoil at your argument and incline them to ignore you. Combat rape and sexual harassment if that's your schtick, but inflating the problem beyond what it really is doesn't help anybody. Also, British law doesn't recognize sexual assault or rape against men as possible, so maybe look at other countries for accurate statistics.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:03 PM
6

now compare that to the size of the population and you will see that it is a minority of people who experience these type of events and therefor your original claim "she's of the lucky few" is a hyperbole.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:31 PM
14

You are claiming most people have these borderline molestation interactions in life then changing it because you know how ridiculous your original claim is.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 01:13 PM
15

please show me a statistic that says more than half the population has been raped then come back and spread your lies that "she's of the lucky few"
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 01:11 PM
3

What's this have to do with communism? Please keep politics out of our thread, lest we be roped into some group of extremists (left or right) we are not.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 12:56 PM
19

And you can't assume that half the population do have those problems? Where is the difference?
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 12:53 PM
16

If she can't speak for everyone then who are you to assert she is of "the lucky few?" Can we see your credentials please?
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 12:51 PM
8

Perpetuating hate will do nobody any good.
/r/AntiFeminists25/12/21 03:07 PM
14

I reported the sub for the name at least 6 months ago. Reddit mods have clearly stated and shown through inaction, that "men are not a protected class and cannot be subject of hate speach."
/r/AntiFeminists25/12/21 03:04 PM
1

As an MRA, this idea of abandoning children is abhorrent. The damage that is being advocated here is irreparable to the child. We use statistics to show the importance of a father in a child's life then say we should have the right to abandon it? That makes 0 sense. If one parent, the father or mother, does not want the child it should be aborted. Because this particular circumstance directly effects the life of a person, any parent that would raise a child by themselves is selfishly believing t…
/r/MensRights18/12/21 02:28 PM
31

hijacking your comment to mention the current look at "reproductive rights" is currently too based in selfish motive. Until society starts considering the effects of single-parenting a child, they will not be ready to have the conversation I call "dual-consent parenting." Children need two parents present. Any parent should be able to put their desires aside and not have a child, in that child's best interest, if the other parent does not want said child. Either both agree and sign a will of int…
/r/MensRights24/11/21 01:32 PM
3

Pinch is a pain sense, which the article describes a plethora of non-pain receptors.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 01:03 PM
31

That last paragraph is such bullshit. It's the most sensitive part of the penis but a minor role in sexual arousal? Sounds like the equivalent of a clit to me. Leading it up with a discussion on the controversial aspect makes it sound like they are scared to take a stance. At least the research is continuing. Maybe they'll discover what those unidentifiable nerve endings were.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 02:40 AM
1

TL;DR: dual-consent parenting should be the law. I agree with you until allowing the child to be born. Abandoning a child is abhorrent. Evidence points to children being raised by single parents as more prone to antisocial tendencies and "damaged." When pregnancy is discovered, both parents should have to sign a will of intent or abort. The short term damage to the woman is far less permanent than the damage done to the lofe forced into being. Edit: i wrote an email to DeSantis about this today.…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 01:35 AM
1

I originally said something along the lines of yes, as long as its not race/class or other uncontrollable factor, but realized it really is specific to the equality of abortion question and the following questions that come of it. I agree we may not change the way children and life are viewed. I'll keep trying to share my philosophy though. Its nice to hear someone out there who can rationalize some of this rather than attack me for saying it.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 08:27 PM
1

I don't believe so. This proposition is a result of specific circumstances; equality of abortion/birthing rights and the impact on children/society. I think pro-abandonment is abhorrent and believe legal abortion reduces damage done to children, consenting adults and societies much like birth control.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 07:37 PM
1

Statistics of single-parent children show most of them have antisocial tendencies such as criminal activity, drug addiction or mental illness. Since most of the children of this demographic are going to be detrimental to society, eliminating the source seems a far cry from requesting perfection. Losing a parent is a different damage to a child than the damage of born unwanted. Adoption statistics show a disproportionate amount of serial killers, violent criminals and mentally ill for the same re…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 06:27 PM
1

I understand that position, i just think sanctity of life is pointless if the life is going to be worse off.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 05:10 PM
2

Women shouldn't be able to force a child into a situation where a majority of them (single-parent children) are criminals, mentally ill and/or drug addicts. The idea that men can abandon a child is abhorrent and perpetuates the damage done to single-parent children. Dual-consent parenting is the answer.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 03:52 PM
1

I feel like i covered some of this with requiring two signatures, but if the wrong man signs then thats his prerogative to sign for a baby he doesn't know is his. If he's tricked then I imagine having a legal document that states his intent to raise his child would make litigation easier. Not finding out til its "too late" is fairly uncommon and I dont have a solution for it yet. Maybe termination anyhow, idk. If she hides it, then she should be punished with community service or put into a reha…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 03:26 PM
2

Woman goes to the OB/GYN and finds out she's pregnant? She must bring in the father for the next appointment so they can both sign, in person. If one person refuses to sign, then the fetus is terminated. If there aren't two signatures on that legally binding document, then its terminated. Agreements would state the intent of both parents, to raise a child together. It would lay forth punishment for breaking the contract; things like child support, maybe community service. Basically, it would be …
/r/MensRights16/09/21 03:17 PM
1

My solution also prevents victims of rape from having to pay child support, men finding out they have a child years down the road, children being used as vindictive tools of revenge, women sabotaging condoms and more. Do you have another solution?
/r/MensRights16/09/21 03:04 PM
-1

Why? You think the rights of one parent supercede the rights of the child?
/r/MensRights16/09/21 02:17 PM
-6

When look at the statistics of single parent children and those left for adoption, is it best for the child to allow single parents to continue to give birth to children? When giving birth directly effects another life, that is not the father or mother; shouldn't we take that life into account in our decisions? This is why dual-consenting parenting is necessary. Require both parents to sign a will of intent at an early gyno appointment or terminate.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 01:13 PM
2

Requiring both parents to sign a will of intent at an early gyno appointment. Dual-consenting parenting is what's best for the child and society.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 01:06 PM
0

Both parents should be legally required to sign a will of intent at the second gyno appointment or the abortion be terminated. There is so much evidence that children of single parent homes are more likely to have antisocial tendencies; majority of them criminals, drug addicts, mentally ill and more. Adopted children are disproportionately effected in the same areas and so forcing pregnancy to adoption, as some prolifers have suggested to me, is just as bad for the child. The point I'm making is…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 01:03 PM
4

Dual-consent parenting. Pro choice against the man's wishes is pro force, so yeah, it does exist
/r/AntiFeminists08/09/21 01:49 AM
2

You're violating the child's human rights pretending it is some sort of possession of the mother. There is evidence that fatherless children are worse off than children with fathers and only a selfish mother could bring a child into that situation. The government's job is to protect the voiceless and prevent crime. Requiring a letter of intent signed by both parents at the first gyno appointment after discovering the pregnancy, or termination, ensures all parties are on board and prevents single…
/r/AntiFeminists08/09/21 01:48 AM
3

Condoms fail and there have been plenty of condoms sabotaged. Currently a man can use a condom and if the woman gets pregnant, it doesn't matter.
/r/AntiFeminists08/09/21 01:41 AM
1

That does not address trauma dealt to the child for being unwanted by their own father. Nor does it prevent women from poking condoms, raping or otherwise dubiously impregnating themselves. Edit to add that the state should not have to pay for someone's kid because she can't find a willing father.
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/21 11:09 PM
-1

"The needs of the many over the needs of the few." It addresses crime rates, children being born into situations their not wanted and men's ability to have a legal defense against women who would use a child for revenge or vindication. Seems like its the only solution, you just don't like that women won't have the final say anymore.
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/21 11:07 PM
2

Then what alternative do you provide? I'm open to discussion, but this is the only solution presented.
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/21 09:46 PM
0

If the mother chooses to have a child that is unwanted by the father it directly effects society as a whole. Just because there isn't a camp for it yet, doesn't make it wrong. That's the most asinine argument I've heard for this topic so far.
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/21 09:45 PM
4

It will be if brought to term. Salty femcel?
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/21 09:11 PM
1

I would be scared shitless if the government existed and didn't protect children from cruelty because a woman can't find a man who wants to have a child with her. Sounds like she's an incel. It is awful that our government has no protections for men who are victims of poked condoms, rape or other acts of revenge or vindication. The fact a child can be born of these acts is abhorent.
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/21 09:11 PM
1

Thats short sighted and ignores the mental health of the child. Even if they "recover" or "move on" from having an unloving father, its still an avoidable trauma.
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/21 08:56 PM
10

Baby's body, government intervention.
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/21 07:48 PM
7

What if the man doesn't want the child? I'm talking about when a woman chooses to have a child against the man's wishes when there is an accidental pregnancy.
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/21 06:57 PM
7

It's possible, but given the widespread acceptance of MGM; it'd probably be very difficult.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 06:31 PM
1

Talk about ad hominem..
/r/MensRights11/08/21 06:07 PM
1

Reflecting much? I've asked a question you're afraid to answer since it will prove you're being combative rather than discussing.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 04:36 PM
1

How can they be sold if not surgically removed? They are directly correlated
/r/MensRights11/08/21 04:11 PM
3

You must be dense if you can't see a correlation between surgical centers in hospitals receiving money from skincare centers for baby foreskins and there being an active baby foreskin market hidden behind medical propaganda.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 03:42 PM
4

The difference being he could have a number that I have been unable to come across. Are you dense or just combative?
/r/MensRights11/08/21 03:34 PM
5

No, he could have information that isn't readily available.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 02:39 PM
30

I stated that's not readily available information. Babies can't donate anything so someone is either giving up the baby's rights or selling them away. From what I've gathered in previous research, this is signed away when the mother is filling out all the other paperwork. Its usually tucked away in the middle of paperwork a person uder duress is signing. The hospitals sell these fibroblasts to skincare companies for a profit. This is a conflict of interest even if there is no manipulation into s…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 02:27 PM
86

Here's a disturbing article which claims the babies "donate" their foreskins. There are claims its a million dollar industry online, but nothing besides blog posts. The foreskins have to come from somewhere and are making someone money.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 12:51 PM
5

It's good to hear its on the decline. Turns out I was using an outdated statistic.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/21 12:23 PM
10

10% (infection rate), 1% (death rate) and 41% (divorce rate) are huge differences. Not comparable
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/21 11:42 AM
10

It passed the senate and is expected to pass the house
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/21 10:59 AM
2

It sounds like she said, he said until the prenup surfaces. I hope it does. Also, nobody should be able to void a prenup by saying it was signed under duress unless she was also forced to marry him under duress. The choice is sign the prenup and get married OR don't sign the prenup and don't get married. Nobody forced her to marry Dre. Dre said a condition of marriage is a prenup (if what he says is true). Then she had the decision to walk away. She shouldn't be able to change her mind after sig…
/r/MensRights23/07/21 04:19 PM
1

Sources? The article listed says his prenup is iron clad and they're not concerned this will be permanent.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 10:39 AM
6

He signed a prenup, as should anyone planning to marry. Here's just another example why.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 09:33 PM
1

From the women I've talked to about this; the consensus is tampons and pads have a luxury tax, but not menstrual cups.
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/21 10:49 AM
12

It was made during a social experiment and brought down within 20 minutes.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 02:13 PM
2

it was in response to a previous report
/r/MensRights02/07/21 01:59 PM
1

Seems it will only accept threads and usernames, not subs
/r/MensRights02/07/21 01:56 PM
6

Nah, fragile would be telling the recipient of blind hate they're fragile.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 01:55 PM
24

I've seen the post and should have linked it in the original report
/r/MensRights02/07/21 12:33 PM
3

Bad bot
/r/MensRights26/06/21 04:53 PM
12

As it should. I sent a message to the admins about againstmensrights, but they vocally don't consider men a class able of being hated against. Had to repost without the crosslink
/r/MensRights23/06/21 09:11 PM
11

Still up
/r/MensRights23/06/21 09:05 PM
5

A little farfetched and easily corruptable, but I believe you're onto something. Maybe we start by ensuring veterans are never homeless and receive the benefits they are promised upon enlisting.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 02:44 PM
5

For those interested and didn't see it, it was a UK based study
/r/MensRights11/06/21 11:29 PM
2

So ironic this happens to be posted today for those of you who think OP is making shit up
/r/MensRights10/06/21 04:24 PM
13

No worries. It very well may be. Feminism in America seems to be like beating a dead cat. If the individual "feminists" are cool (which I've found a few here in America) then the next step is checking the organizations. The most extreme viewpoints seem to be expressed by the orgs.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 11:30 AM
9

The short term effects to her are bad, yes, but the longterm effects to the man's pocket and to the child more likely to be a criminal are worse.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 10:55 AM
3

Advocate for dual-consenting pregnancy. It is the only way we can prevent this
/r/MensRights10/06/21 10:54 AM
34

Dies is very close I believe. Its annoying when I talk about a MRA issue like MGM and am laughed at by my peers because "FGM is so much worse." One, FGM is outlawed in most of the world; two, i was talking about MGM; and three, they can both be bad, but only one is still legal in all but maybe one or two countries (the information on South Africa and Latvia is sparse). Feminists I have talked with refuse to accept men have higher suicide rates, rates of workplace deaths, likelihood of paying ali…
/r/MensRights10/06/21 10:50 AM
27

We consider people innocent until proven guilty, there is no reason we should be releasing names of innocent people to the public from crimes they may or may not have committed.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 03:12 PM
2

When I first became drinking age a local bar, Ollie's in Summit County, had local's night. It was awesome! Free drinks for two hours every Thursday. I moved to FL and was met with Lady's Night. I was appalled but everyone here buys into it.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 03:04 PM
2

"would the matriarchy rear aggressively in a collective effort to quell the discontent and put men back in their rightful place, beneath women? We may never know." I couldnt read any farther. She'll never know cause she is rearing aggressively. She's afraid to let men talk just like the CCP is afraid of Tiananmen.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 08:42 PM
2

Totally using this next tine
/r/MensRights07/06/21 08:30 PM
3

Interesting to see 7 years ago, Time Magazine say KAM shouldn't be joked about, and last year BottomLine basically saying men need a thicker skin. Jokes are all well and good, but this is like joking about killing animals and has no place for the public eye. I hope prosecutors can prove the 11-yo killed himself due to KAM. It needs to be stopped.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 11:49 AM
36

Idk. I was making a joke, clicked the link and noticed the same. If anyone from there sees this, please make me mod.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 06:23 PM
10

You are correct. I was mislead. After diving deeper it looks like Latvia and South Africa may have bans currently in place.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 04:58 PM
6

You're right. Maybe Latvia and South Africa? The articles on the legality are filled with so much fluff. I also found out California made it illegal for local governments to attempt to outlaw MGM.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 04:55 PM
27

There are two countries out of 200+ nations where it is illegal to circumcise a child. You are the minority. Look it up
/r/MensRights02/06/21 04:13 PM
20

You have no proof. And your statement isn't even coherent. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2019/10/09/are-men-and-women-equally-emotionally-intelligent/
/r/MensRights02/06/21 04:05 PM
61

So privileged. She even says its based on TV at one point. Its written in paranoia and was the first post in my feed. The sub is a platform for hatred and misinformation, but reddit is more likely to censor one of us under the same pretense.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 04:03 PM
24

What country is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/21 03:58 PM
70

Fuck off
/r/MensRights02/06/21 03:57 PM
52

I've read papers on it. I'll focus on saving my sanity til the next time I'm laughed at by the majority of my peers.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 03:42 PM
25

You're gonna have to show some research before saying some misandrist shit like that here.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 03:38 PM
125

Nothing is a men vs women matter. I am an anti-circumcision activist and often laughed at. Here in the US, most boys are circumcised without consent at a young age. There is tons of misinformation spread about circumcision. Maybe you should go back to TwoX.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 03:36 PM
52

I often wonder the same. The system seems so perverse with extreme feminists making it look like they have it so bad through misinformation. They always show their true colors when the draft is brought up. Hulu, Lifetime, it's the same thing. Dramatic theatrics about abused women who make up the "majority," but that's only the case on screen. Abortion is rediculously defining of their beliefs that men have it better, but we're still forced to pay for them after. I just want to keep children from…
/r/MensRights02/06/21 03:32 PM
22

That is so illogical I can't wrap my head around it. Was she an illegal immigrant? He had a 0 tolerance on immigration, but nobody can be deported based on orientation.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 03:26 PM
3

Look at your first sentence. "Most women view men as an appliance." Have you asked every woman her opinion?
/r/MensRights02/06/21 03:25 PM
157

In Africa, maybe. Does FGM happen in 1st world countries? We call MGM circumcision.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 03:24 PM
116

We could have a whole sub.. r/shitTwoXsays. It will be crossposts of every other TwoX thread, filled with hatred for men while spreading misinformation about the rights of both parties.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 03:23 PM
4

If those books are going to make me loathe women in the way it sounds you do, I'm all set. I'm all for men's rights, but not at the expense of others'.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 02:24 PM
8

I don't know about all that. That sounds like the same mentality this woman has. We should keep our balls about us, but assuming women see us as appliances is wrong, morally and literally.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 02:12 PM
4

If I were a citizen of the UK I would totally sign it. I wish the UK movement all the best.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 05:02 PM
2

Even if, is disgusting. Not sure how anyone could even joke about that.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:52 AM
11

That's what is happening in the UK with the gender neutral domestic abuse approach right now. Gender neutral is the only appropriate response.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 10:33 PM
10

Its so strange. These people want more rights to be recognized for all until men are discussed. This man in particular sounds like their's not enough progressivism for everybody.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 10:30 PM
4

How am I just learning this? Aveeno, Oprah? Its major brands and markets. Smh
/r/MensRights15/05/21 05:22 PM
7

I am still subbed from the old days. Every time I think its a non-toxic community again, I read some man-hate monologue with all comments being ill-informed hatred or [deleted]. It is like a dictatorship now that I think about it. And just like a dictatorship, they all buy in smiling.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 05:32 PM
2

Section 4 also uses the term "he" and only leaves provisions for the raped to have been penetrated.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 10:40 PM
2

Reading through the laws further would indicate that only "he" is capable of sexual assault or rape. Edit: I can type
/r/MensRights28/04/21 10:32 PM
2

Its not. The useful argument is showing the same shit happens when asking for a vasectomy. I have been denied 3 times because I'm "not old enough, and have 0 kids." I've never wanted kids. If doctors really cared about protecting their own asses they could just make patients sign legal documents.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/20 03:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter