TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FurryM17 Archive

View 0 posts and 67 comments by FurryM17 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I guess that could be true. I think it's more likely that whatever the SSRIs were prescribed for in the first place led to them committing violence.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 09:16 PM
2

Quite a few I would guess. I can't really picture gangbangers turning to prescription drugs for their mental health.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:45 AM
7

Because SSRI's are prescribed to people with mental health problems. There are plenty of people on SSRI's not committing mass shootings.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:37 AM
1

The same people spitting on disabled people in the street, apparently.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:12 AM
1

This would be the case in the United States too. If we ever somehow got invaded our current definition of the militia means every man aged 17 to 45 is going to be fighting.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:00 AM
0

Is the idea of you working and celebrating the 4th with family supposed to elicit some kind of reaction from me? What was all that about? I'm just saying that people in blue states can protest abortion rights on behalf of people in red states. Someone doesn't have to be directly affected by something to protest it. In fact a lot of really important things would not have gotten done if people approached it that way. Edit: Blocked rather than even entertaining the idea of a discussion. Ok.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/22 11:48 PM
9

Is that how you interpret "protest in the streets"?
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/22 11:26 PM
4

Weird that someone would protest on behalf of someone else.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/22 11:25 PM
2

I guess it could. It would have to be a pretty big conflict if the war on terror didn't warrant instituting the draft, though. In the event of war with Russia, let's say, if the US institutes the draft that will probably be the least of our problems.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:58 PM
1

Hearsay, your Honor.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:25 AM
2

The crab in a bucket approach wasn't really what I had in mind.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 04:05 AM
1

That seems like a 'yes'
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:08 AM
1

I just want to ask straight up. Are some just happy that women will now be closer to being as miserable as men in this country?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:50 AM
1

I'm not really worried about that going forward since we fought two wars for twenty years and didn't draft anyone.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:48 AM
1

I hope you're right
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:08 PM
1

I don't really understand. There will be about 600,000 more births. You don't think any of those may result in a death? Medically necessary abortions have always been available so that doesn't seem like an influencing factor.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:38 PM
1

That's true. Physician assisted suicide, however, is legal in 10 states. "Right to die" is a thing. Most Americans believe they should be free to terminate their life when they see fit. I imagine more states will adopt such laws in the future.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:33 AM
0

Depends on how poor we're talking. Being so hungry you're eating human shit? Definitely.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:48 AM
-2

It's better to be dead than suffering.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:46 AM
-1

That's with access to abortion, though. It'll be higher now. Before anyone freaks out that's just a fact too. It may not be "high" but with more childbirths the fatality rate will go up.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:45 AM
0

Everyone should be responsible for their own actions. I thought the idea was to remove the responsibility from the woman so that she didn't decide to have an abortion. Like if I offer you two cars and say you're responsible for picking the one you need. If you point to the one that seems best but I say you can't have that one am I really letting you take responsibility?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:39 AM
2

Maybe they're getting vasectomies because they like sex but don't want kids. With contraception being on the chopping block too I bet a bunch of people are planning on getting sterilized. I don't think it's about solidarity as much as covering their own asses so they're not on the hook for child support. They can always adopt if they change their minds. You couldn't pay me to raise a kid right now. Humanity's good days are behind us, at least for the rest of our lifetimes, in my opinion. I hope …
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:10 AM
1

On both sides? That sounds more like a Democrat thing.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 11:18 PM
1

Oh goodness. You're from the UK? I'd like to apologize. I did the classic American thing and assumed you were American. Ok so at the risk of having my face rubbed in it I will openly admit that everything you just talked about is completely unfair, unjust and quite honestly inhumane. I really didn't know any of that about the UK. If a person is obligated to fight and possibly die they should have the right to vote. Full stop. Especially after WWI! That wasn't as much a war as it was mass human s…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 10:49 PM
1

Oh ok. Sorry I was just wondering if it was intentional or something systemic.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 10:29 PM
1

Are men's votes being suppressed in general?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 09:30 PM
1

Do you mean women turn out in higher numbers?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:51 PM
1

Well I'm a man so I have at least a blind spot to my own priveleges compared to women. I thought maybe you were and we could compare. The biggest one I can think of off the top of my head that's not even a legal thing but a universal one is that I'll never have to worry about getting pregnant and giving birth. That is just the way it is. All the dangers or judgments that come with that will just never apply to me. That is a uniquely female thing. Ultimately to answer your question I don't really…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:46 PM
0

Oh ok. I thought you meant it wasn't recognized because of the Taliban or something. If Afghanistan doesn't meet the requirements for a patriarchy does any country past or present? Did people just sort of conjure up this idea of a society run by men, in your opinion? Afghanistan is a pretty strong example of a patriarchy, to me. I mean, let's be honest, no matter how devout she is a woman won't be the leader of Afghanistan any time soon. I don't think it even happened during US occupation when w…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:35 PM
1

Are you a woman?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:13 PM
1

I guess it depends on what you consider a privelege. Are we talking priveleges afforded by law or just privileges in general?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:04 PM
1

What do you mean by actually exists?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 07:49 PM
1

I see.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 05:46 PM
1

I see. You would consider something like Afghanistan a patriarchy though right?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 05:21 PM
1

But rich men don't care about poor men, not because they are men but because the rich never care about the poor. If all races, genders, and orientations, were equally represented in the rich, they would still shit on the poor just as much. It isn't men or "whiteness" that is the enemy, but "richness". If we replaced rich white men with rich black Jewish trans-women, they would absolutely carry on the oppression without a hiccup. Look how the rich in India treat the poor in India, or in Japan, Af…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 05:15 PM
1

Some women are in charge but overall women are dominating over men. Did you mean 'some men'?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 05:10 PM
1

Ok. Well let's you and I think of a word for when men primarily make up the government and the nobility and therefore have most of the power. Edit: without the added baggage I mean.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 05:08 PM
2

Ok I was just asking. You know you don't have to pick teams right? I mean I push back on women all the time for bias against men. The men's soccer thing is a good example. The men get paid more because the they're more popular. It doesn't matter how much the women win. Also I'd go out on a limb and say men's soccer is way more competitive. The female team is not better than the men's team period.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 04:33 PM
1

Draft obligation. Ok I joined voluntarily so I you'll have to explain that a little further. Does not registering for the draft mean you can't vote? Idk what you mean. I got my definition of patriarchy from Wikipedia and according to that US is not a patriarchy, if anything it is a matriarchy. Because the women are in charge?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 04:26 PM
0

I don't understand! It's literally just a way to classify who's in power! What it can't be a monarchy because not everyone is a monarch? I feel like I'm having a stroke in here.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 04:22 PM
1

Going to suggest a simple idea to you: people at the top more often belonging to a demographic does not mean that that demographic as a class has power in any meaningful way. Sure doesn't. It does mean this though that those people at the top are that demographic though. If they're males it's considered a patriarchy and if they're females it's a matriarchy. Most of the government is men and most of the billionaires are men. That is all I am saying. Yes women get preferential treatment in society…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 04:20 PM
1

Do you think I'm a woman?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 04:09 PM
1

How are men dominating over women when men don't even get same the right to vote as women in US? What is that in reference to? Look I'm not saying women aren't doing better than men in society. I'm certainly not saying men have it easier. Women are treated preferentially in many aspects of society. I'm just saying that men occupy the seats of government and have most of the money. I never thought I'd have to debate that those things equal power.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 03:59 PM
-2

Oh I'm woke now. Yes men occupy the least powerful positons. How can I make myself more clear that men can be in charge of other men and mistreat them? Have you guys just never read any history?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 03:47 PM
1

No it's how you treat something you're trying to protect, though. They didn't even have the right to vote until 100 years ago. Look I'm just as upset about biases towards men as anyone else. Someone's running the country and to me it seems like the men.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 03:45 PM
1

Ok I see where you're coming from.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 03:37 PM
2

Ok. Look into what a protected species is and tell me if that seems to indicate something that is doing well or is powerful.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 01:57 PM
1

So 100 rich men > 10,000 poor men = patriarchy? Sounds like a classist issue more than a sexist issue. Certainly not a patriarchal one. That can only be a patriarchal society. If there are no women then only men can lead that society. Men leading society is what patriarchal means.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 01:53 PM
3

No I'm saying wealthy people and the government have a lot of power. People in those positions are mostly men. Men controlling most of the power in a society is known as a patriarchy. I didn't make the definition. I have no idea why people are bringing up communism, mistreatment of men or sexism. It's just how people refer to a society that is run mostly by men. That's it. That's all patriarchy means. I don't know how other people define it. If this thread is anything to go off of it varies grea…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 01:36 PM
1

And that doesn't sound at least a little bit like America to you?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 01:31 PM
3

Oh ok. So we're going by whether women are the majority in the country. Whoever is the majority among the people? Please tell me I'm understanding because I'll be so lost if that's not what you mean.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 01:27 PM
1

your definition of patriarchy is not what most people follow. You can't just make up meanings for words. Ok then tell me what your definition is. I'm not making it up I've talked to people about it and I looked it up before discussing it with people to be sure If men are mistreated then it is not patriarchy Wait we're NOT making up meanings for words?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 01:24 PM
2

And there's nothing you can do about it. https://www.britannica.com/animal/lion/Reproduction-and-life-cycle
/r/MensRights01/06/22 01:09 PM
2

you're acting like people with money are the root of all problems You jumped on the one thing I agreed to set aside because we could sit here all week discussing at what wealth threshold someone becomes powerful. your definition of "power" is pretty weird The government? If it's not money and it's not government what is it?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 01:06 PM
2

Lions are actually confusing because it's a male who is kind of in charge of fending off other males and securing territory but the females who have much of the responsibilities like hunting and raising young. Males will bully single females but collectively females will bully the males. I think males also tend to come and go. I don't know. I guess it depends on how you define the power of a lion. Hyenas are definitely matriarchal though. Mostly females except non mature males. Obviously led by …
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:58 PM
3

Ok Edit: What's your definition of patriarchy? What would you call a society where women held most of the positions of power?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:02 PM
1

You literally just strangled your argument with your own words. I'm not really sure how. I'm just saying men occupy the powerful positions in American society. I'm honestly a little blown away that that's a controversial opinion. You know hating men makes you sexist, right? Has anyone ever told you that? No one has ever told me that. I've always assumed that was because I was a white man, though.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 11:49 AM
-6

Well my point was that AOC isn't shit compared to, say, Jeff Bezos or Bill Gates. But now people are freaking out about the definition of patriarchy. It doesn't matter who's at the bottom or the middle. It matters who's at the top. It's mostly men. The -archy is just whoever's at the top. In the US if the President, Vice President, Congress, The Supremes Court, and most of the billionaires were women we would call it the matriarchy. Yes even if the people they were mistreating included women. Do…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 11:33 AM
-8

That's funny. Seen PLENTY of diffrent deffinitions of patriarchy. Ya'll should sort yourself out. Who's "y'all"? What demographic do you think I make up? I'm an average white dude from Texas. And if we have a messured difference in who seeks power, in spesific areas, HOW would you suggest we enforce a gender equal power structure? Fuck if I know. I was just making a joke about how 175k literally ain't shit to the elites.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 10:24 AM
-30

The patriarchy means that it's men who have most of the power. Money generally equals power but I'm willing to set that aside. In the US the president has never been a woman. Only recently has the Vice President been a woman. Congress is mostly men. The Supreme Court is mostly men although it will only be a one person majority soon . Now before anyone says it yes "Brick layers are all men." Who's at the bottom doesn't change who's at the top. If men have the majority of the power it's considered…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 10:10 AM
-31

It's not?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:28 AM
-43

I get where you're coming from but the wealthiest people on the planet(mostly men) wipe their ass with $175k.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:07 AM
15

Well, yeah. It's an entertainment company. No reasonable person would consider it news.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:05 AM
6

This is a wild comment
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 08:47 PM
2

Why are we scrambling and scrambling to find all of the societal and economic factors when there is one factor no one can deny? All mass shooters had access to a gun. Before everyone freaks out, no that doesn't mean guns are the entire problem. And no it doesn't mean I think we have to ban guns. What I'm saying is that there is a clear factor that unites all mass shootings and it's the one we have the most power to control, in my opinion. Until we want to start regulating parenthood I think the …
/r/MensRights29/05/22 10:48 AM
0

How does overturning Roe free men of this problem, though? Won't more men be obligated to be parents?
/r/MensRights07/05/22 05:15 AM
74

Do not ever approach an unknown child by themselves unless you believe that child to be in danger. Do not be overly friendly with children in general. Don't approach or talk to people that don't initiate contact. If you do be conscious of their body language and expressions for signs of discomfort. If all of this sounds like dealing with a wild animal you're kind of right. You're essentially a stray dog now. You're probably friendly but it's safer for people to assume you want to rip their throa…
/r/MensRights04/04/22 03:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter