| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Was yesterday "let your belly hang out under your shirt" day?"I saw some icky ladies" What point are you trying to make here? | /r/MGTOW | 29/06/18 07:27 PM |
| 2 | State of the Womens WorldIt's all good, I don't really expect to change anyone's mind. I did this as much for me as for anyone else. | /r/MGTOW | 09/03/18 03:31 AM |
| 0 | State of the Womens Worldyou have so many sources why not this one? Surely women now make up the majority of scientific and technological advances? Those college degree stats were meant to illustrate that today's women (women who are "away from the influence of men") are participating in the intellectual/academic community. It stands to reason that-- at least going forward --this would lead to great advancements spearheaded by women. The reason I don't have stats about particular advancements is because I have no idea w… | /r/MGTOW | 09/03/18 03:04 AM |
| -1 | State of the Womens WorldAs in my original comment, I will argue in your best-case scenarios, with the assumption that neither discrimination nor inadvertantly unequal treatment are factors. My original comment is a rebuttal to Wallace's claims, and it seems that some of your claims are different from Wallace's (which isn't a bad thing; it just affects where this argument goes). Which still means they haven't come up with cornucopia of great inventions and discoveries Those college degree stats were meant to illustrate … | /r/MGTOW | 09/03/18 02:10 AM |
| -1 | State of the Womens WorldAre we just going to forget 2000 years of history and more? The USA isn't the entire world, mate The claim in Bob Wallace's quote seems to be that women make worse choices now that they are "away from the influence of men". As I explained, I chose the most recent statistics to make sure that my timeframe was one where women were surely away from this influence. I also looked at year-by-year or decade-by-decade numbers to figure out if these things had become more or less prevalent in recent year… | /r/MGTOW | 09/03/18 01:33 AM |
| -3 | State of the Womens WorldYou're probably right; I made that comment for mostly my own benefit. I'm bedridden and outraged by the stuff in the quote, so making a counter-argument was really the only thing I could do to let my frustration out. I don't really expect to convince anybody | /r/MGTOW | 08/03/18 10:41 PM |
| 0 | State of the Womens WorldSure, I agree that single life is preferable to matrimony with manipulative gold-digger that hates you. I just don't think that all women fit that description. I'm not the guy who asked "Who hurt you?," but people ask the question because-- when somebody has the conception of all women that you do --a likely explanation is that they've had a bad experience with a manipulative gold-digger; that somebody's hurt them. | /r/MGTOW | 08/03/18 10:29 PM |
| -4 | State of the Womens WorldAlright, I'll bite. My counter-argument is that even if we assume that all the things listed in the quote are necessarily bad and that discrimination is a non-factor, almost everything Wallace claims is untrue. Most of the things he says have become more or less prevalent since women were released from "the influence of men," have actually don the opposite: (I can't know the exact year that women shrugged off "the influence of men," or where this has happened, so I'll use US stats from the last … | /r/MGTOW | 08/03/18 10:21 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter