TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fuzzball6846 Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by Fuzzball6846 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

International organizations are almost exclusively focused on those women. If you mean explicitly national politicians or organizations, then no. They focus on their nation’s women because that is their relevant area of concern in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 04:14 AM
1

I am a woman in her early twenties. I think they are losers because every one I’ve ever interacted with came across as a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 02:24 AM
21

The UN, etc talk about women’s struggles because women are effectively enslaved in several countries and are second class citizens in dozens more.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 02:20 AM
1

Wow, pedantry and studies you didn’t read. Again, I don’t know what the point is here given the claim you’ve chosen to attack has no bearing on the broader argument and your sources don’t even substantiate your own counter argument. Food insecurity reached record levels during the Great Depression. And yes, people did starve. Did you miss the very infamous drought that occurred at the same time? Never mind the poverty. And Hoover, very notably, lost to FDR (who implemented extensive food assista…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 04:26 AM
1

Men were expected to work while women stayed home, sure. But this isn’t the argument being made. Plenty of men got married young w/o stable employment during that era. The proximate cause is the fact that people were literally starving to death.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:41 AM
2

What do you want me to prove? That most economists don’t subscribe to the lump of labour fallacy and recognize it, correctly, as a fallacy? Literally just go on google scholar, put in the keywords, and read for yourself lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 08:16 PM
2

Here’s an IGM Chicago poll of US economists (incl. labour bigwigs) on the issue of automation: https://www.kentclarkcenter.org/surveys/robots/
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 08:10 PM
2

I think marriage is contingent on men’s ability to provide and cited declining marriage rates of the Great Depression as an example. You speculated that the decline was completely due to imminent concerns, but I think it also relates to a contingency on male providership. This theory doesn’t make sense because women in the Great Depression would’ve needed “provision”, however meagre, much more than after it. Rich people are also rich and more appealing to someone interested in money/providership…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 08:03 PM
2

Most economists at BLS would agree with my interpretation lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 07:58 PM
2

I’m not even sure what you’re arguing anymore. Nothing in this comment disputes my original point whatsoever. Rich people are more well-adjusted in their relationships and are less likely to divorce in general. Women are somewhat more likely than men to value lifestyle, while men are more likely to value physical attractiveness. Nonetheless, people overwhelmingly pair in their looks/income bracket. Not sure what this proves.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 07:47 PM
2

Most SAHMs today either live in countries that either can’t afford modern conveniences or are still adjusting to the inevitable economic reality that they will bring (ala 1950s America). Most SAHMs in the West are deeply ideological Christians in upper-income brackets who can more than afford their LARP. I’m sorry that you won’t get to live through your bitter, psychosexual revenge fantasies, but they won’t. The idea that automation will “steal” jobs is just a re-hash of the lump of labour falla…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 07:41 PM
3

You are misunderstanding the cause and effect. It’s not a case of women souring men for “not providing” (lmao) it’s a case of both men and women having more pressing concerns than finding a mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 07:33 PM
2

No, that’s not how opportunity costs work. If a household is given the choice between a second income and doing nothing, they will choose the second income every time. Your great grandmother broke her back cooking and cleaning because it genuinely took her 70+ hours a week. Doing the laundry alone took a whole day. Today, household chores can be completed easily in under six hours. Homemaking was automated away by the washing machine, the vacuum cleaner, the supermarket, etc. Women (and men) tod…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 07:24 PM
2

Again, bad argument. “Men were guaranteed marriage as long as they didn’t starve to death first” isn’t a powerful addendum.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 07:19 PM
3

Uh, no. It means people put it off to deal with not dying first. If that’s your argument, it’s pretty poor.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 07:07 PM
3

Same reason the birth rate fell during the war. Uncertainty means people put long-term plans on hold. Not hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 06:59 PM
3

No, I’m referencing the fact that the vast majority of people got married and reproduced in the 20th Century.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 06:52 PM
3

No, he was guaranteed a wife by following the path his family set out for him. Not hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 06:35 PM
4

“Trending conservative” as in a whopping 23% of high-school boys identify as such. Wow. The reality is that most men and women are normal, good, sociable people and will continue to pair up and get married. For the ones that do not, men who were once guaranteed a partner under patriarchy will no longer get one and be removed from the gene pool accordingly. Society will move on like they never existed. That’s “biology” for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 05:12 PM
5

Then I’ll bring a gun.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 02:36 PM

When you hear about the loneliness epidemic, is your first reaction to demonize it as forcing people to have friends? Call it oppression by extroverts? No, our first instinct is to show disgust towards the OP who just went on a massive rant detailing his fantasy about how women are going to have their equal rights/status stripped for rejecting X, Y, and Z. I, and most other women, would have no problem showing compassion towards and giving advice to someone genuinely lost and in need of it. The …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 02:33 PM

The “consequences” in question being, implicitly, a dystopia where women are denied basic freedoms and are forced to be subservient to men. Why should we give people like this the time of day again? lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 02:26 PM
3

You did. Just now.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 02:24 PM

Yeah but Dobbs has backfired spectacularly and greatly benefited the left overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 02:21 PM

Nothing’s going to “give”. “Homemaking” has already been automated away and now takes 4-7 hours a week where it was once a full-time job. A second income is always going to be the rational choice in that environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 02:21 PM

The internet threatened primarily female jobs when it rose to prominence (e.g. librarians, secretaries, typists). The women in question simply found new ones, as in every single case of technological displacement. This will not have the effects OP thinks it will.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 02:17 PM
1

Many chronic gamers are lazy or emotionally unavailable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 08:06 PM
2

Trench coats on the right person 👌🏼
/r/seduction18/11/20 08:59 PM
3

My dad is a HVM. Perhaps one of the best. I’ve never met a person in my life who I’ve respected more. He was always around when we were kids, never yelled, always made time for the family even when he was busy, etc. I swear that man has the patience of a god. I think he’s the reason I have such high standards in men.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy01/05/20 03:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter