TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fuzzpot Archive

View 0 posts and 123 comments by Fuzzpot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

God help anyone depending on you for safety.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 03:03 PM
0

Women are more important to the survival of the species. 1 man and 100 women can have 100 children. 1 woman and 100 men can have 1. This is why, when good people go to war, they should mostly be men.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 11:32 AM
2

Letting someone else die for you and your wife/mother/children is absolutely cowardice. If you just want your soft life but no one ever has to defend it, well, that soft life will disappear. As the Russian people are learning today. Not enough of their men stood up to Putin; and so, their soft lives are disappearing. To be clear, soft lives are good. They are what we should all strive towards. Life should get better and better, with each generation. Nice office jobs for 35 hours a week with a ca…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 09:24 AM
-3

I think this is really weak tea. Yes, it sucks not being able to be a coward if you want. But that's what men are built for, we're built to quickly add our genetic code to the reproduction of the tribe, and then spend the rest of the time using our superior strength and endurance to protect the tribe, acquire diverse, calorie dense proteins, construct shelter, and if necessary seize new genetic material from other tribes. I think that any man who can pick up a gun and yet chooses to run away is …
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:19 AM
-5

Men's rights without men's responsibilities is as cowardly as modern feminism. All rights, no responsibilities.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 02:35 PM
1

I mean I agree with all of that, but it's also a paradox that is very difficult to actually build law around.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 02:16 AM
1

I can't figure out if this sub's theory of the case is "men and women are equal" or "men and women are different" It seems like it's often "men and women are different, but should be treated the same" which is a kind of tough needle to thread given limited time/money for... everything
/r/MensRights02/11/21 01:56 AM
-10

I dunno, women are smaller so it seems like a pretty good plan imo
/r/MensRights10/10/21 10:45 AM
2

I dated a woman for 5 months, at the end I had some trouble with my family and was depressed for like a week, nothing serious, just bummed out She said I had "changed" and dumped me
/r/MensRights13/07/20 03:12 AM
1

It's a pretty good movie, and a little anti-feminist too, which I like.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 08:15 AM
3

I kinda think that the women are telling the truth mostly but the disconnect is that we assume that for x number of women there are also x number of men. From my anecdotal evidence from college I knew a few predators who everyone whispered about, and each one easily went through and left broken at least 7-8 women over their college careers, at least 1 per semester. So I think that the disconnect between so many men feeling unfairly painted with a broad brush and the women feeling like no one is …
/r/MensRights09/10/18 05:46 AM
1

Nah, fuck that. This woman is an enabler of worst POTUS ever, embodiment of everything wrong with masculinity and lacking of anything good: all pride/ignorance/greed/anger, lacking any nobility/loyalty/stoicism.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 10:59 AM
-1

In countries where abortion is illegal, the government has absolutely compelled women to give birth. The classic recent example is Savita Halappanavar in Ireland. Because abortion is (was) illegal unless a doctor orders it in Ireland, a situation which could quickly become the case in 20+ US states, this woman died because a medical team made a bad call, which happens quite often because medicine is never 100% precise. This is why abortion needs to remain legal, because in the USA it's the indiv…
/r/MensRights29/06/18 01:50 AM
3

Abortion is a terrible thing. Both sides agree that in a perfect world, there would be no abortion. However, we do not live in a perfect world, and there are unplanned pregnancies, rape, incest, and most commonly medical issues which cause women to seek abortions. For these reasons, a blanket ban should never be implemented. So, the logical way to approach this question is "what methods reduce the rate of abortion while remaining within the bounds of the constitution." For example, the governmen…
/r/MensRights28/06/18 08:34 AM
4

They did present an argument, you just seem to be unable to gather the capability to engage with it.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 08:20 AM
1

/r/iamverysmart
/r/MensRights28/06/18 08:18 AM
1

The feminist mantra of "well behaved women rarely making history" seems apropos here, perhaps.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:52 AM
2

I understand your point and support it. However, I think gently reminding feminists the good that men do is an important part of advocating for men's rights, as one major reason men's rights aren't taken seriously is that men are popularly described by their worst traits, rather than their best.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 03:57 AM
2

All rape experiences matter
/r/MensRights18/10/17 05:13 AM
3

I think there's enough of an overlap that people shouldn't be surprised.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 10:56 AM
1

It wasn't.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 05:37 AM
1

IANAL but from my reading of CA emmployment law an employee can be fired for EITHER "good cause" i.e. the employee did something the State of California agreed is worthy of firing; or "no cause," essentially for no reason at all. That leaves a third category, of course, "cause" that the State of California does NOT agree is worthy of firing, i.e. is protected. As this employee was clearly fired for critiquing his company's policies internally, I'm pretty sure that it falls under the third catego…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:40 AM
1

Plus a big payday from Google for wrongful termination.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:16 AM
1

Plus a big payday from Google for wrongful termination.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:16 AM
1

Assange admitted they curate their info releases. They sit on some stuff they get.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:15 AM
1

Assange admitted they curate their info releases. They sit on some stuff they get.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:15 AM
1

Assange admitted they curate their info releases. They sit on some stuff they get.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:15 AM
1

"Honey, I know I didn't consult with you before buying my new Audi, but it's ok, they are a very progressive company, support shrinking the wage gap"
/r/MensRights04/02/17 02:00 AM
2

Go ahead, dude. Have fun. While I support men's rights and think they are under-appreciated and under-addressed, and that feminism has gone too far, I also think women have every right to march against a guy who has referred to them so callously. If men feel the same way, let's march.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 10:50 AM
3

Ah yes, one of those "listen to me," "sorry I can't listen to you" kind of friends.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:14 AM
4

Ah yes, one of those "listen to me," "sorry I can't listen to you" kind of friends.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:14 AM
12

He said he assaults them, and they let him do it. Letting someone commit a crime doesn't mean it's not a crime, just that the criminal got away with it.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 09:17 AM
-4

Nah, like suddenly the whole neighborhood says "my stereo got stolen when that guy moved in" Sure, imperfect metaphor, but my point stands
/r/MensRights13/10/16 06:30 AM
5

If I say into a hot mic "I enjoy stealing stereos," then the cops find a bunch of stereos in my garage, it's not a matter of being credulous for folks to think I steal fucking stereos
/r/MensRights13/10/16 06:17 AM
2

People show their true selves when they don't think anyone is listening.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 06:16 AM
16

Trump boasted, in private, about doing this exact thing. So color me unsurprised. The timing's probably intentional, but can't blame Hillary (or these women) for leveraging their position for best effect.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 06:15 AM
1

Whenever this is brought up in conversation I ask my interlocutor "So you would be ok with just a little female genital mutilation, as long as it was done in a hospital and the parents REALLY thought it was a good idea?" So far I'm 100% making them at least think about it.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 03:45 AM
1

Needs to be a better idea in society between responsibility and culpability.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 12:48 PM
1

I'm not sure why it seems to be the case that anything below 100% safety seems to be outrageous. For millennia adults have understood that if you drink, bad shit happens. These days that's an offensive statement. Very weird age we live in.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 12:47 PM
4

Multiple women have access to the best men. In monogamous situations lowest-tier men can still find low tier female partners, because there's rough parity in numbers. In a more polygamous situation the bottom of the male ladder is pretty much screwed (see modern China).
/r/MensRights05/05/16 09:13 AM
2

The war on women is, in large part, a civil war.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 05:50 AM
1

Market value is set through negotiation. That's all this is.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 05:07 AM
3

I agree. I usually think forcing equal-pay or gender quotas by fiat is stupid, but in this case I've seen several stats that show the women make more in advertising. If that's true, I'm fine with them pushing for more money through actions and lawsuits. Good for them.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 01:44 AM
2

The suit states the women's team earns more money than the men's. If that's true, they have legit complaint imo
/r/MensRights01/04/16 12:46 AM
8

That's completely wrong. If I set a fire in a dry state park without any idea that there's a ban, and then the forest fire kills twenty people, should I be held blameless? See drunk driving, handling poisonous/toxic materials, etc. If I left a bucket of poisonous pills on your sidewalk by accident, and your kid ate one and died, would you really just shrug at me and say "shit happens?" Or should I just be fined? Community service? Of course not. I did something so egregiously and dangerously stu…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 04:06 AM
0

Playing around with a loaded gun is like driving drunk. It's negligent, perhaps grossly so.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 04:01 AM
1

There's never evidence (or in very rare situations) that women are let off because of their gender. But the fact is women in general get significantly reduced legal consequences for their actions, ignoring causation/sexism etc out of it.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 04:00 AM
14

As typed on a computer and uploaded on an internet powered by power plants all invented/maintained by white men
/r/MensRights23/12/15 01:57 AM
4

I don't get why women think men are supposed to commit to unpleasant people.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 03:18 PM
1

Just saying "please, please?"
/r/MensRights26/11/15 05:41 AM
-1

I mean, sort of? Depends on the coercion. Nagging for sex isn't rape.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 01:07 AM
0

Hey there chief, chill out. There are players, then there are predators. This guy was the former. I agree with what you're saying, but that doesn't stop him from being what he was.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 10:15 PM
1

Easy there sport.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 07:48 AM
2

I'm assuming it's because you'll have to check some box saying "I swear this is the truth." Then, if you're a guy, you can actually have some evidence to fight back against. Women can always team up to accuse a guys of whatever they want, at least now it's closer to actual testimony, instead of a whisper and hearsay campaign.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 07:16 AM
-5

I'm actually in favor of this. 2-3% of men are actual sociopaths, and better tools to get women together to identify those actual serial predators are welcome. There was a guy in college who the whole time would constantly groom girls and then bang them and drop them. It was sociopathic... in the same way the judge said about porn: "you know it when you see it." This guy would use these girls up physically and emotionally, and leave them shattered shells, and then move on to the next one. To thi…
/r/MensRights12/10/15 07:15 AM
4

There should be some parity. A cop lying under oath that he saw you murdering someone should (in an ideal world) be treated different than if he just lied that you stole some gum. I'd think the same standard should probably apply here and as sexual assault is considered one of our society's most heinous crimes, lying about it should be punished more severely. That said, saying someone who lies about rape should get as much time is a rapist is stupid, and more importantly impossible: part of the …
/r/MensRights12/10/15 06:09 AM
3

There's a lot of smart people who still believe this. Don't let it get you down.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:56 PM
9

This is the #1 thing which ticks me off about modern feminism. How much it claims to understand what being a guy is like. I'm a guy, and I don't claim to understand what it's like being a woman, and I expect the same courtesy in return.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:24 AM
7

No. The grid is more efficient for several reasons. The first is that large power plants can benefit far more from economies of scale. They extract more energy from the fossil fuels than cars do. The second is that power plants make scrubbing technology more cost-efficient, so technology you can't fit to your car can be used in a plant. Lastly, the grid is increasingly supplied by non-fossil fuel source of energy, many of which can't be used in internal combustion engines, such as liquid salt st…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 02:15 PM
4

That's not at all true. Running things from the grid is far more efficient and clean than from individual internal combustion engines.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 09:48 AM
2

While not fighting anymore in the courts seems like the only thing you can do, consider coming up with a scrapbook or blog or something in which you can record things for them. Send birthday cards, and keep copies. Do whatever it takes. I was vaguely alienated from a parent... my mom took me overseas, and taught me my dad was a scumbag. It has two levels, though, because in some ways I (and my sister) were taken from him without his consent. But he never tried to get us back, and when I met him …
/r/MensRights21/08/15 12:41 AM
3

If men are the privileged sex, why do they spend more time doing more dangerous work?
/r/MensRights26/07/15 12:28 AM
1

Well, I think it's just that in a world in which being innocent doesn't protect you against rape claims, then being gay isn't going to be much of a defense either. I mean, I agree with you, that in a reasonable world it would, and should be. If you are gay, being accused of rape by a woman doesn't make sense. But sense seems to no longer be part of the conversation in some parts.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 08:57 AM
2

I guess that when I 'feel' most things that get in the way of what I'm actively doing/pursuing, I try to ignore them, yes. Because if they are getting in the way, they are an obstacle, and obstacles are not good things. I guess there are other emotions which are to be pursued, but the quiet satisfaction of completing a goal or having someone else's respect is far more important to me than any other expressive emotions. Of course I get major grief when I have to put down a pet, or have a break-up…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 09:03 AM
1

When I'm drunk I sure as hell can give consent. Because I'm a responsible adult and never drink so much I lose the ability to make important decisions.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 06:02 AM
1

Yes, because of the implication.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 05:59 AM
2

Strange, considering the whole blow-up was over a woman being fired.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 01:45 PM
6

I know. But I also have to make future decisions on my past experiences. If I'm dating a woman in the future and she starts insisting that she cares about me expressing my feelings and wants me to be super-careful with consent, I'm going to temper that with what I've learned from the past. Not that I'll ignore what she says, I'm just not going to ignore what I've learned.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:05 AM
8

I'm sure sure about that guy's language or slang, but all my experience with women supports it. They like being nice and polite intellectually, but it doesn't really get the motor running, if you know what I mean.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:36 AM
5

I think it's less yawning, than fear of failure in one particular aspect college-age men are particularly concerned about: sexual success. Simply, and somewhat crudely put, it's difficult to get laid when you are vilified by social leaders within the local feminist campus community.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 01:03 AM
2

I guess I'm somewhat of a idealist in that I believe that we should both support each other, and that the great failure of modern feminism is not that it supports women, but that it ignores men. I advocate that men should support women, in the same way women should support men. I certainly understand this is a bit of a pipe dream in the current toxic environment, though.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 10:02 AM
2

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 07:37 AM
1

I understand/agree with your point, but I think we should always try to take the high road.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 07:36 AM
3

I agree entirely, but I also think that the reason this is an issue fraught with difficulties is because it is difficult, if not impossible, to determine when a true equilibrium has been reached. I do not think 50/50 representation in the senate is a natural equilibrium, as a 50/50 representation on a lumberjacking crew in Alberta would similarly not be a natural equilibrium. My assumption is that there is not yet a natural equilibrium in the sciences, with women getting the short end... an assu…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 07:25 AM
-8

Because there may be talent that may just happen to have ovaries. Mens rights should advocate for for more women in science, but by helping women reach the same lofty standards men do, not by bringing those standards down.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:45 AM
-2

I'm just trying to push back against the modern direction in which the individual's feelings are being put on some sort of pedestal. Offense is becoming the most important factor in decision making, not efficacy or real solutions. "Man up," in the context of encouraging someone to find real solutions to problems, rather than indulging in anxiety, is a good thing. Of course, the "man up" which tells guys not to seek counseling is no good. But I fear we're swinging too far the other way.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:23 AM
-4

Man the fuck up is usually a call to ignore feelings and get shit done. I'm distressed that this has somehow become a negatively thing. I wish men would continue to man the fuck up, but also that women would man the fuck up, instead of dragging men down into the sewers of endless emotional flailing. Emotions are real, but they are not useful. This is not to say men can't have emotions; just that one of men's greatest attributes over the centuries has been that we get shit done, often by manning …
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:55 AM
4

So you're okay with female circumcision, then, because most women who have had it done are fine with the decision their parents made for them?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:44 AM
-4

I'm fine with this. It's a website with a particular mandate incorporating a holiday into that mandate. And it's an important task, there are still communities and countries in which violence against women is a serious problem. The article does not paint men as beasts, it paints dads as important, and serving an important role in one part of the healthy socialization of children, namely that violence is a last resort and should only be used to protect. Mens rights, as they are, should not tear d…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:20 AM
2

Because safe spaces are what they want, not what we want.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 09:51 AM
2

Hey, not to try and change your mind, but life is too great to listen to anyone who crushes your soul, man. I mean, even if he has a point, he has a point FOR HIM, and you are your own man, with the power to make your own way in life. Women are a pretty awesome addition to that. The main lesson to be taken from /r/mensrights is that men have some issues worthy of general respect, not that women are somehow all terrible.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 11:59 PM
6

Dude, this subreddit is useful for sources, but is BY NO MEANS the complete picture. I've dated many, many totally awesome women, none of whom have even come close to doing any bad shit to me. The lesson to be learned from this subreddit is just that you should protect yourself, because there are some crazy people out there, and some of them are women. Most women, I repeat, are wonderful! We are built to enhance their lives as they are to enhance ours. Don't let a small sample of very bad experi…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 11:56 PM
1

I'd say yes. My initial instinct is to then ask them not to comment on political issues regarding male childhood, but I guess I don't care.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 01:44 PM
6

Sure glad women know so well what it's like to be a man.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 01:35 PM
1

If the guy keeps landing fridges on icebergs floating in space a few hundred million miles away he can spend his whole day wearing only cock socks for all I care.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:10 AM
2

I am honestly curious what goes through your head when you decide to just swear at a fairly well-constructed post like that. I mean, you could just say "I disagree." But instead, you tell the OP to "Fuck off." Why?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 08:21 PM
8

Dude, get a new magnet made but switch genders. Put it up and see how long it take people to notice.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 02:19 AM
0

Nope. I'd suggest her parents have a talk with her and perhaps talk to a children's psychologist. You know, a reasonable reaction, not calling her a sex offender.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:29 PM
0

I don't agree there's some magical line at 5 years old at which point kids suddenly stop being kids. I think there is a line which is not currently in law at 14-15, but not younger than that. Children are children, and a 7 year old should be taught why what she is doing is wrong, but it's an entirely different category than sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:47 PM
2

I haven't read the book. But yes, 17 is of age, in my humble opinion.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:30 PM
-1

I just don't think little kids know what is wrong/right at that age. Period. Sexual assault at least requires puberty, imho.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 04:23 PM
0

Wasn't she 7 when this happened? I'm sorry, but that's just the usual kid's stuff.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 03:23 PM
1

It's an extra option, not a godsend. Like a high interest credit card.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:53 PM
0

Because the CEO's of competing companies are sacrificing their relationships with their families and will do better.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 12:39 AM
-7

If I was a shareholder I'd have him fired.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 11:55 PM
0

I agree, I just think that men had more choices. Not always, of course, and never the choice to be the stay-at-home parent. But women had none, or virtually none. Housewife, spinster, or nun.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:44 PM
-1

Yeah. Women in the west are fine now, but before the invention of the washing machine someone had to spend 4-5 hours a day hand washing laundry. That was usually the woman of the house. It was necessary, and yes, sometime male slaves did it too, and it was the best system we had and yes, oppressive. Not that there was a better option, but it was shitty to be a woman back then.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:04 PM
5

Love that the guy doing it clearly has a motor function disorder of some sort. I've seen hand shaking like that in alcoholics.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:20 PM
11

Well that seems to imply female circumcision done in a polished operating room at the Mayo clinic would be ok. Which I don't think anyone would agree to.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:17 PM
-4

It's not ok, but it is factual that women have been oppressed for thousands of years. Hell, they still are overseas, it's just that here in the US they have achieved equal opportunity and yet still complain.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:11 PM
1

So it's both pro and anti-feminist. It's real, but not the patriarchy. Geez, sounds like a whole new paradigm may be needed.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:40 AM
2

I agree. I just wish the numbers had better labels. 1 in 4 women have probably been on the receiving end of a large spectrum of different sexual misdeeds, as you mention. However to cast awkward sexual mistakes or miscommunications in exactly the same light as date rape or violent sexual abuse is ridiculous, as the first will always be with us as long as humans require verbal commands to communicate, while the second can be close to eliminated with careful policy decisions. Of course I understan…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 04:12 PM
1

PUA/Redpill is organized sociopathy.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 12:46 PM
2

Oh I think men should have paternal leave too, I just think it's more debatable than maternal. My personal best-case scenario would be each couple get 4-6 months to divide how they want, but I think women should be guaranteed two, minimum.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 06:44 PM
4

The one thing I'm down with for just straight inequality is maternal leave. Women have the equipment, and go through some serious trauma, and I think a decent society can give them some time off.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 05:36 PM
-2

If feminists and traditionalists are the only people voting, are you surprised no politicians take other positions?
/r/MensRights24/06/14 04:23 PM
0

People who opt out of democracy are cowards. Their complaints that their representatives do not represent them are self fulfilling prophesies. If you don't vote, you don't get to complain. You have earned the right, through your laziness and cowardice, to not be listened to.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 03:36 PM
-1

Both of whom get elected, time after time, because 50-75% of registered voters DON'T VOTE. If you did vote, hey, suddenly the politicians would actually start pandering to your opinions. Anyone who doesn't vote because "they are all the same evil" is an idiot. Of course they don't do what you want, BECAUSE YOU DON'T VOTE.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:13 PM
-5

Ah yes, the "why do anything" approach.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 12:48 PM
3

On the off chance this is real, jesus christ.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 06:25 PM
1

I think the men's rights movement has a lot of good points, and I'm a dyed in the wool, hardcore leftist. Socialist, even.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 03:52 PM
0

Maybe it's time to just admit men and women are different?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:28 PM
2

Do female condoms work at all? I have never tried one, and I expect they would just end up getting lost and require a fair amount of extra materials on hand.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:23 AM
10

And here I thought it was only mine
/r/MensRights04/06/14 07:54 PM
1

And what if she says yes? Do I have to pack a breathalyzer with me every time I go out on a Saturday night?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:00 PM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:39 PM
2

I agree. It's very strange that men and women, the peanut butter and jelly of humanity, seem to be at each other's throats in some spheres of public life.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:19 PM
1

Basically fewer, healthier children due to basic sanitary education. Cheap and efficient.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:35 PM
1

Not really. Educating women is the best dollar-for-dollar development strategy. More development, less superstition.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 04:20 PM
1

Thank you for confirming you are fine having a child taken from her home and handed to a ex-con stranger.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 02:06 PM
2

She's nine, man. Two wrongs don't make a right. Those are her parents, not kidnappers.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 02:49 AM
-3

All the more for me! :D
/r/MensRights08/05/14 08:32 PM
1

I think it's just saying how to make it clear to kids that some things which might seem borderline are actually rape.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 12:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter