TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GHGCottage Archive

View 0 posts and 171 comments by GHGCottage on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Feminists have had firm control for over thirty years. All the hate and discrimination you're starting to see in the US has been commonplace here for all that time.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:53 PM
3

Come down out of your tower and look at reality for a change;it's not at all what you insist it is.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:08 PM
2

Not sure if you live in Moncton or somewhere like that, but in the major cities canadian culture is far from dominant. Vancouver is majority asian now, and even the Guardian acknowledges toronto to be fifty percent foreign born. Add in the anchor babies and again non-canadian culture is dominant. I don't understand why anyone continues to pretend otherwise;it's a fait accompli at this point.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:07 PM
2

Women lobby for women-only things because they are bigots. They shouldn't be accommodated any more than any other bigot.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:01 PM
3

You say gender discrimination is illegal in Canada but at the highest level, the constitution, only discrimination against females is prohibited.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:56 PM
1

Civil disobedience works best with numbers. Organise fifty or a hundred men to refuse to obey the sexist rule. It won't change anything immediately but it will draw attention to the matter. Read the Charter of Rights and Freedoms; in Canada discrimination against men is legal.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:48 PM
3

Quite literally. Men have fewer constitutional rights than women. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms reaffirmed women's right to be free from sexual discrimination while taking that same right away from men.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:52 PM
0

Actually I consider Harper to be just that, a serial murderer. Worst of all he's put blood on the hands of every Canadian tax payer by using our money for his vile attacks on Afghanistan.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:40 PM
5

Yeah, she knows that. She's flaunting her power as a feminist to clearly and publicly claim things are the opposite of reality and have everyone be too frightened to contradict her.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:46 PM
1

In Canada men have fewer legal rights in the constitutional document; that certainly qualifies them as second class citizens. If having fewer legal rights doesn't define the term 'second class citizen' what does?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 06:22 PM
1

Your 'teach men not to rape' campaign also revolves around tips for non-rapists.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 04:18 AM
1

Wow. Agreeing with women's opinions is 'progress'.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:41 PM
3

Misogynistic? If we buy into their narrative we've already lost. Apart from incredibly rare serial killers who target only women misogyny is nothing more than a myth, a victimisation fantasy. Being critical of individual women and of women as a socio-political group is perfectly acceptable. In fact they desperately need it. Being angry at women is also perfectly acceptable. Their behaviour often deserves an angry response.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:37 PM
3

Why are you turning this around? Women do something dreadful to a child and you suggest a man who objects hates women? You're working hard to stomp on criticism of women.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 05:56 AM
15

You're white knighting a bit;responding to a sexist urge to protect women. You admited the observation was correct but were uncomfortable it was brought up in relation to women when it applies to men as well. Criticism of women is fine. In fact I'd say they need it much more than men in our current society.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 08:54 PM
0

Predictable outcome of both a bad thing, falling testosterone levels in men in general, and a good thing, women being more financially independent. If men are less inherently masculine than thirty years ago due to hormone levels it's reasonable they'd be less happy with the most apparent consequence of this; the appearance of their bodies. If women are more willing and able to pay their own way in life it's reasonable to think they'd be freer to pick mates based on appearance and that this would…
/r/MensRights22/08/15 08:42 PM
2

It was only a boy.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:21 PM
1

Why are you working so hard to attribute wrong doing to the man here? You're literally inventing his imaginary future abuse of his daughter in order to distract attention from the real actions of the monstrous mother.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:16 PM
0

As always women are the real victims.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:13 PM
2

White knighting prevents rational thought.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:07 PM
2

She is a triple child murderer motivated by sexism; holding her accountable is appropriate while trying to diffuse responsibility by tagging the nearest man is not.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:04 PM
3

Down voted for propagating feminist disinformation in order to defend a child killing monster.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 08:16 PM
3

Other racism may not seem so open to you if you've never lived in a non-White community. I live in an Asian community and their racism is very visible, much more so than white racism in the white community I've experienced. This is largely because their culture doesn't discourage it in any way.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:40 PM
2

I'm pretty sure they are completely aware of the hypocrisy, they just happen to revel in it as a demonstration of their power and 'specialness'. Just like a smug teacher's pet. Unearned privilege is worth far more to a feminist than earned privilege; having to earn things is for lowly 'males'.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:49 PM
5

And they have the social power to get away with it. The outlandish double standards go without question;note the article didn't dare mention that the same unfairness is routinely done to men.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:35 PM
6

Not sure how canada is any better. Discrimination against men was legalised in the early 1980s and because the legislation refers to "historically" disadvantaged groups it cannot be used to allow discrimination against females, and has no built-in mechanism for turning off 'affirmative action' programs. Even if women become 100% of university students they are still "historically disadvantaged" and so may be beneficiaries of 'positive' discrimination.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 01:52 PM
2

Maybe she thinks the men are asking for it by being strippers.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 10:28 PM
1

Or teach women to write more broadly appealing books. I know I generally reject books written in an overly personal style, with a focus on the author's feelings about other people. Perhaps women tend to write that way.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 01:05 PM
4

Given how rotten her behaviour was do you ever doubt her stories about your father? Surely telling a few lies to offset one's own guilt is well within the range of permissible action for someone who starves, neglects, and sexually abuses her own children?
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:36 PM
3

As the advantages women garner from feminism become more and more firmly established (e.g. pro-female sex discrimination being entrenched in constitutional law) there is less reason for women to take the risk and effort of being overtly feminist. Their advantages are hard-coded into society and won't evapourate if there are fewer women at slutwalks. So in effect they are feminists without having to come out and say so.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 04:50 PM
9

Possibly his eyes are so lovely that he realises it gives him an unfair advantage to look someone directly in the eyes. Or perhaps he's trying to avoid being accused of intimidating the women with his oppressive male gaze.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 05:47 PM
33

I'm sure the women think they won since they steadfastly replied "but that's not true", never changing their view despite his attacking them with those sexist facts.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 05:43 PM
5

Those women actually waited a full eight minutes before trying to silence him by interrupting and talking over him. That's real progress.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 05:39 PM
1

A CDC study is the source of the information regarding women being the aggressor in seventy percent of cases where only one partner is violent. This rings true to me. When your female partner hits you, likely you wouldn't dream of hitting her back.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 10:45 PM
1

Because homeless numbers typically are calculated to include people who are in fact housed, in emergency shelters, by friends, etc., the proportion of those actually living in the street who are men is likely much higher than 62 percent. As always the funding goes to the females;homeless women get housed but are still counted as homeless.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 10:42 PM
1

Helping create false rape panic in order to big up Hilary Clinton?
/r/MensRights31/07/15 10:02 PM
1

Absolutely. And if the numbers go up too slowly we'll just have start a ground war in Asia to speed equality along.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:47 PM
1

And in some areas women are making more, women under thirty in the UK for example. As the gender education gap ages into the workforce I'd expect to see this continue.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 02:17 PM
1

In Canada the single tax even extends to (some) food;buy for one, pay tax, buy for four, no tax.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:25 PM
1

Just a bit of fakery to garner support for female only suicide prevention efforts, which will no doubt require separate all female infrastructure and so dilute the effectiveness of service delivery. But it will provide cushy public dollar jobs for some more women's studies grads and that's the important thing.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 03:23 AM
4

And the claim that anyone who doesn't agree that video games make people more agressive is most likely of all to be made more aggressive.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 07:33 PM
1

You seem really intent on having the accused prove their innocence. That's not how we do things in democratic countries. Try to leave behind the backward ideals of your barbaric homeland.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:42 AM
0

This might sound like a joke but it isn't. Reading TwoX has given me a more nuanced understanding of women's health issues which has in turn made me more forgiving of the seeming obsession some women have with their own genitalia.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 01:43 AM
-2

She's just arguing for a change in feminst tactics in achieving their "wish to justly combat" MRAs. While that's worth something, she certainly doesn't acknowledge that there are any valid MRA issues. It's all about how best to defeat MRAs.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 12:44 AM
1

I'm certainly not a feminist but I largely support her view. The guy's a pandering throwback to the seventies.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 07:59 PM
1

It's as if he's channeling a 70s feminist man, Rob Reiner's character on All In the Family say. Because I'm pretty sure the last time men actually expected women to cook and clean was the 70s. He'd probably wants pats on the back for 'allowing' his wife to work outside the home.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 07:56 PM
2

What a disingenuous fellow. Going bowling and having sex without consent is rape too.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 07:08 PM
1

What one's own culture does is worse because one is directly accountable for it. What happens in Saudia Arabia isn't my doing, what happens in Toronto is, even if only indirectly via the democratic process. To ignore western MGM because of FGM in far off lands is utterly wrong.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 04:36 AM
1

It's part of a decades long hate campaign designed to make men appear less than human so that doing bad things to them by law is widely accepted. They treat men like garbage because they truly believe men are garbage. It's a well trodden path, I assume people can think of their own examples.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 10:34 PM
3

Women are so deeply good that they literally couldn't conceive of behaviour as bad as men's, and they couldn't recognise it until it was too late.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 10:28 PM
1

I wish that it still meant that, but things have changed. People really believe it now;it's not pandering but sincere.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 10:21 PM
1

No, and recognising what you don't know and when you really need help is a valuable skill. It just neednt be the first option all the time.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 10:19 PM
1

Taught or not it's generally the best approach because it enables you to learn skills. All those things I didn't ask for help with I learned how to manage myself.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 10:13 PM
1

Thirty years ago this would have been seen for the transparent pandering it is by everyone, feminists most of all. But their long running anti-man campaign has been quite effective and many people now truly believe that women are more intelligent than men. They need that in order to explain away the effects of their discrimination programs as simply women taking their natural superior position in the world.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 09:45 PM
1

It's like they wired a woman's studies 101 module into your brain. All the tired old points faithfully regurgitated.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 09:19 PM
1

And of course retroactive consent only means they won't involve police, it doesn't negate the assault in anyway.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 09:13 PM
1

That they are shown not objecting is the problem. It perpetuates the notion that men are to be treated as willing sex objects: "See? They love it when you grab them without consent"
/r/MensRights20/07/15 09:09 PM
3

Her article mocking suicide among men is essential reading but conveniently for her it's not mentioned in the telegraph article. I think it was in the Guardian.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 08:35 PM
5

Exactly. Why is it necessary to denigrate them even while acknowledging they are suffering from very serious problems?
/r/MensRights20/07/15 08:29 PM
1

Really can't blame anyone for believing it at this point.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:26 PM
2

Ritualised public humiliation of innocent boys now part of the curriculum;how can people not see how dreadful feminism has become? Perhaps the boys will be driven into the arms of Islam as the only place they can get any respect.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 02:27 PM
12

I expect her to sell mattress and film as an installation to some national gallery for something around a million dollars. It's very topical art.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 06:50 PM
3

The country the school is in already privileges girls over boys in schooling;increasing that inequality counts as fighting inequality? Some circuits misfiring somewhere...
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:16 PM
2

Perhaps they just don't like hetero-sex. At least one academic feminist has explicitly stated that she wants men on campus to be afraid to have sex with women. Maybe they think that by preventing women from their natural sexual outlet with men they can drive innocent young college women into the arms of the women's studies department.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:34 PM
2

She's been told being drunk negates her consent but I've yet to see any case where this is true in a criminal trial. Just a matter of feminists lying to women in order falsly inflate rape numbers.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:22 PM
1

As soon as it became known that the lawyers working against Cosby were aiming for 150 million dollar jackpot for sharing amongst victims, the number of claims became irrelevant (in my view).
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:59 PM
-6

Perhaps because you seem to want to criminalise common and widely accepted behaviour. Making normal behaviour a crime is rarely a good thing, with some exceptions, like banning slavery, criminalising marital rape. I don't thing this is one of those exceptions because many women like to mix drugs and sex;generally there is no victim.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:54 PM
1

Just like buying someone a drink. Simply a different drug. Of course if you administer it without their knowledge it's rape. If they take it intentionally and become unconscious, it's rape. If they just like to trade sex for drugs, or want sex and want to 'enhance' it with drugs, that's not rape.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:48 PM
1

I don't have a source but want to say it's perhaps important to point out that men's performance has changed over the last thirty years. Makes it more difficult for them to just reply "Yes, men are stupid".
/r/MensRights06/07/15 07:19 PM
4

It's a good impulse and does you credit, but I worry that men's natural compassion is what allows feminists like her to continue using their immense social power to propagate hatred.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 09:30 PM
2

Pretty sad situation when people try to silence opposition to even a monstrous hate filled bigot like this feminist. How far exactly do they need to go before you're willing to be critical?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 09:23 PM
6

I think men are as emotional as they want to be and view allowing emotion to rule one's life as a bad thing. Better to solve one's problems than cry about them, it makes you more competent and self reliant; those are good qualities in anyone. As to the subtly dehumanising suggestion that men can't feel a 'full range of human emotion', I think men could hardly have dominated the world of art and literature if they weren't fully human and experiencing and expressing all emotions.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 09:19 PM
29

What kind of political party lets its opponents dictate who it can have as a candidate?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:44 PM
3

There is no reason to expect her to grieve;she welcomes men's suicide.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:05 PM
9

Standard feminist procedure:lie to minimize any problems of men.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:02 PM
6

You seem to care more about the feelings of this monstrous woman who used her enormous social power to spread hatred of men than anything else. Her son is driven to suicde and yet she's the victim?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 07:55 PM
6

Too soon? Are you concerned about her feelings? You needn't be as she's said numerous times that she doesn't care about men's suicides. I believe her.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 07:48 PM
1

That used to be a valid argument for women being seen as more valuable than men but the species hasn't been anywhere near in danger of dying out from under population for a very long time. In fact we are in the opposite position now and over population is the greatest threat to all life on the planet. We ought to adjust our relative valuings of the sexes.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:55 PM
8

I can't believe many sex acts take place the way you suggest, with questions about consent being asked. I've never asked a partner and a partner has never asked me. It seems you want to make me and all my sex partners into rapists. Criminalising normal and almost universally acceptable behaviour never works out well.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 06:44 PM
2

I wish more people would think about what motivates people like this. Very clearly she only cares about cycling deaths because some women have died;what sort of demented hatred inhabits her mind?
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:49 PM
0

Why don't you step aside then and tell your boss to hire a black woman in your place? At the very least you ought to refuse raises, bonuses, and promotions since those resources might otherwise be used to make a spot for someone whose demographics you find worthy. Or do you just want to throw other white men under the bus?
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:08 PM
1

There may well be many qualified candidates for a job, how could that justify denying that job to even one of those candidates because of their sex or race?
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:05 PM
1

Some people are opposed to sex and race discrimination; they won't agree with you.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:02 PM
2

I think most men have a sense of honour, they differentiate between right and wrong, and so it's constantly astounding to us just how much feminists love to lie. I guess they hate us so much it feels like a real victory to be dishonest.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 12:52 AM
1

Many people understand that what feminists claim to represent matters very little next to what they do. And what they do has practically nothing to do with equality. In fact feminists are, along with some organised religions, the only supporters of sex discrimination in the western world.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 12:46 AM
1

We know what feminism actually does;you can't magic that away by arguing about its definition. That's almost totally irrelevant. You may as well talk about what colour box your shoes came in.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 12:42 AM
6

Either you are being disingenuous or you have so little experience of adult life that you don't realise there can be a vast gulf between what people claim they stand for and what they actually do. What they do matters.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 08:55 PM
3

In Canada both men and women used to have the legally recognised right to be free of sexual discrimination. Feminists wanted to discriminate against men, so used their great social power to pass entrenched legislation ironically titled The Charter of Rights and Freedoms which removed this right from men while re-confirming it for women.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 08:50 PM
1

I've never seen a black software engineer in real life, despite decades in the industry, albeit in an Asian majority conurbation. Now there is a large increase in the number of black people in the area (because the federal government has active policy to recruit black citizens, going so far as to send civil servants to African cities to help people fill out immigration papers). Should 3 percent of my work colleagues now be black if the population now is 3 percent black, up from zero ten years ag…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 08:03 PM
1

But there has been a great deal of change over the last seventyish years for other groups so there is no reason to assume men can't have change too.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:46 PM
2

Ah. Come back in another twenty when you may have learned something of life.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:37 PM
1

Women in western nations have more rights than men and better lives. The only way for women to be equal with men is for them to lose life quality and rights.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:35 PM
1

Feminism can't afford to close the empathy gap because much of their legislation and policy directly harms men. That's the reason for all the hate propaganda;to maintain and enhance the empathy gap in order to forestall opposition to policy that harms men.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:32 PM
1

As long as there are more women than men being stay-at-home parents there cannot be equity across all occupations. Would be good to know what the numbers actually are because they need to be taken into account. If twenty percent of women aren't in the work force there is no reason to insist their participation in any field exceed forty percent.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:17 PM
1

Does being kicked out mean they typically end up in foster or group homes? That's generally a horrific outcome, far worse than simply breaking up the family. Those kids are often fucked for life.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:07 PM
1

Pointing out the nasty things feminism does should not be described as demonising. There is no way to tell the truth without feminism looking horrible. And we ought to be able to tell the truth without harrassment and vilification.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 04:50 PM
1

Things are too far gone for any solution of that sort. Feminists are never going to actually support men's issues. They may well decide to work to co-opt supporters away from men's rights by pretending interest, but most of them would rather die than let up their one-sided war on men.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 04:35 PM
1

The proposed solution, creating more institutional sexual discrimination against men, is much worse than the potential problem. One study, a very small, likely politically motivated study, suggests possible bias by individual students. This cannot justify real bias intentionally carried out by an institution.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 12:40 PM
0

The whole point is to intentionally provide superior service to women, how on earth can one imagine that would also mean better service for men? Do you think white-only police stations would somehow help black crime victims?
/r/MensRights28/06/15 11:35 AM
3

They wouldn't be required to do any hard police work, just the sitting around chatting, drinking tea, watering flowers kind.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 11:29 AM
3

Or flip a coin. The one thing you should not do is decide based on sex or race.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 12:28 AM
5

They should be dealt with separately because one is actively practiced in western nations and so deserves far greater attention from citizens of western nations. We (assuming a western audience) are responsible for MGM and have the power to stop it.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 03:28 PM
1

This is amazing. Apart from the first sentence I don't think I understand a single thing you've said. Five paragraphs, all words I know, and yet...
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:25 PM
1

Good chance they do EARN less because they likely work less hard just as they tend to in other fields. Less work means less experience which equates to less value to their employer and hence lower earnings. It's incredibly audacious to demand free money because you've chosen to work less hard.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 06:35 PM
2

People like this really ought to be banned once it becomes apparent their only aim is to disrupt and waste people's time.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 05:20 PM
1

In some countries DNA testing isn't permitted without the mother's permission, and inadmissible if done anyway.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:18 PM
2

Just in time for the automation revolution to eliminate the jobs those missing people would have done.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:10 PM
3

"Eventually level off" unfortunately meaning when we all have the standard of living of Indian and Chinese peasants. No thank you.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:09 PM
1

More economic growth has come from innovation and related productivity gains than from mindless population growth.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:07 PM
1

Their selfish breeding is driving the climate change that threatens all life on the planet. We need to get passed this blind support for unchecked reproduction. We can start by at least not encouraging and facilitating it.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:06 PM
1

I really don't want a continued race to the bottom as we move toward Indian standards of living. Just because we could jam two or three billion people into North America doesn't mean we should.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:04 PM
3

Sounds as if there was no rehabilitation at all; her hatred of men is still present if she views having to speak to a man as unusual hardship.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:43 PM
2

Having equal legal rights is necessary starting point in my opinion. If one sex lacks some fundamental legal right the other has that at least ought to be fixed.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:32 PM
-1

At some point art transcends the artist. Maybe at all points. It's no longer about her personally but rather about the issue generally.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 05:06 PM
1

It is legal in canda to discriminate against men. Has been since the 1980s when the 'Charter of Rights and Freedoms' was passed, removing that right from men and whites.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:24 PM
1

Yeah, she's a woman, she wouldn't do anything wrong.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:12 PM
1

Trying to elicit advice that would help get this sub banned. That's the way I see it anyway.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:48 PM
1

Whatever you do don't pretend to be the opposite sex and troll for advice on Reddit.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:36 PM
1

Responding to much higher male suicide by gloating about the strength of women is sickening behaviour. With no other group is weakness taken as reason for abondonment.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:00 PM
1

Would you apply the same logic to other political movements? Claim for example that the Repulicanism of your aunt Joan is what matters rather than the Republicanism of Jeb Bush and other elected Republicans?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:32 PM
1

The extreme few feminists (if such they are) happen to be in positions of enormous social power, they define what feminism actually does in the world and so it makes perfect sense to focus on them.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:28 PM
1

And very often much of a man's higher earnings are dedicated to enhancing a woman's quality of life. Women simply don't need to earn as much money as a man in order to afford the same life style.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:21 PM
2

Do they want equality of outcome? I've seen no feminists argue for turning off sex discrimination against men in education even though women are 60+ percent of college students and earn more degrees.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:22 AM
1

Feminists tend to favour genital mutilation of male infants; they do not support bodily autonomy for men. I know how feminists oppose equality, how do MRAs?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:16 AM
1

You seem to have accepted many of their fundamental notions already. How can you win a debate if you already accept the idea of patriarchy and simply argue it's benign? You seem to be pro sex discrimination against men, describing it as helping women overcome societal prejudices. You describe women being able to get ahead based on looks as sexist, and presumably oppression of women, when it ought to be seen as an advantage women have. They can succeed via work, or via their looks while men have …
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:08 AM
1

They can be prideful and still take your seat. They simply believe that they deserve to sit because they are a superior breed of person, akin to royalty. It's only fitting that you should stand, preferably with head bowed, eyes averted, while they sit.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 04:14 PM
1

I can't imagine anyone thinking the quoted text was actually in any written judgement. It's very obviously the OP's opinion. Criticise her misuse of quotation marks if you want but let's not pretend they implied the judge said that.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:47 PM
3

Whenever people try to get men's shelters in place feminists fight it. Feminism is in favour of sexual discrimination (in my country feminists successfully removed the right to be free of sex discrimination from men) and should be opposed. Feminists oppose equality for men because it threatens women's privilege .
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:42 PM
2

Keep in mind the widespread harm feminists have done to men, and the vile hate propaganda against men they disseminate; bitterness and rudeness are more than justified.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:28 PM
0

Or the feminist sub-reddits.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:25 PM
0

I don't think religious organisations should have any special rights and so should not be permitted to discriminate by sex or orientation.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 02:18 PM
1

Why do these people insist on participating in feminism's dehumisation of men by using the word 'male' where the word 'man' belongs? Over decades this stuff makes a difference; it's always easier to get people to go along with hurting a group that's been successfully 'othered'.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 05:03 PM
2

I don't feel sorry for them at all as they support sex and race discrimination. Some (most?) male feminists have real privilege that they hope to preserve by supporting feminist work to divide and conquer the bulk of the population. They understand that real reform measures based on socioeconomic privilege might impact them, whereas sex and race discrimination programs are easily overcome by their family wealth and power.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 04:45 PM
1

The feminists are working on this by getting the burden of proof reversed for consent. I don't believe it's happened anywhere yet but it is part of the platform of one major party in New Zealand.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 03:11 PM
1

And even if she doesn't press charges the matter will come up in divorce negotiations. For example, the husband will be told that if he contests custody rape allegations will be made in court. This is a cost free win for the wife as most men realize they will always be guilty in the court of public opinion and so give in without a fight. In Canada at least divorce lawyers are legally obligated to tell female clients that even false allegations can work to win concessions for them without even ge…
/r/MensRights08/06/15 03:08 PM
1

Having sex with a drunk person should be a criminal offence? Surely this would criminalise a great deal of currently acceptable behaviour? Many people intentionally use intoxication to lower their own inhibitions with the specific intent of making it easier to have sex. Even people who have no difficulty getting willing partners do this. And many others simply happen to enjoy both intoxication and sex, and so sometimes do both at once. Criminalising normal behaviour never works out well.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:42 PM
1

I agree there are differences but in both cases the central issue is the ability to form the intention to engage in some behaviour. If drunkiness can prevent intent formation where sex is concerned it might well prevent intent formation where a criminal act is concerned. For most crimes it is necessary to prove intent.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:35 PM
2

The pass is still available. Locally a woman stole a car while drunk, drove into oncoming traffic killing a man; sentence suspended because (and the judge explicitly said so) she cried in court, demonstrating she was remorseful.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:14 PM
1

It's one thing to encourage open discussion, but to put up with derisive comments from someone who is plainly against the very idea of men's rights seems counter-productive. Those who can't comment without attack ought to be banned.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 01:32 PM
1

Worse than hopeless. She's laughing out loud at what she assumes to be your pain. But she'll swear blind women are kind and compassionate. Standard issue feminist; when it speaks, it lies.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:05 AM
1

That's often not the case at all. Some jurisdictions have arrest-the-man policies which they think tends to minimize harm because men tend to be able to cause more physical harm, and removing a woman from her home is more harmful than removing a man. So if you call the police a male victim may well go to jail, lose his home, family and career.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 04:53 PM
1

It's sexual discrimination but in Canada that is only illegal when it applies to women. The right of men to be secure from sexual discrimination was removed by the entrenched Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the 1980s.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 04:28 PM
2

That is praising with faint damns;feminism doesn't just do little, it actively works against bringing that about.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 04:01 PM
1

This is skilful stuff:feminism's attacks on men are described as issues feminism seeks to resolve, a neat inversion of reality. For example the notion of 'toxic masculinity', a term of gendered hate propaganda if there ever was one, used by feminists to demonise men for decades is now described as something feminsm fixes by breaking down sex roles.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 02:42 AM
1

It's normally very easy to tell when kids are playing, so it's a bit puzzling why the woman failed to pick up on it, unless the boy is handicapped in some way and doesn't put out normal social cues. Assuming he's normal she may well have simply been displaying her power to you, putting you in your place for using her park.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 01:41 AM
1

Telling you to use the feminist organisation is completely inappropriate. It's a way of ridiculing your powerlessness.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 08:17 PM
1

Can I call it fried chicken?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 07:33 PM
1

If she was raped the film is good, powerful art. They have to believe she was raped, so they have to praise the art.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 07:29 PM
1

You can't evaluate her sanity based on her art-speak unless you speak the language too. Go read some art criticism and compare it with what she says. She's actually more understandable, which makes sense since she's just graduated. Admittedly I haven't read any art criticism since the 80s but I can't imagine it's changed much.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 07:16 PM
1

It's a measure of how courageous she really is; she's willing to relive the most horrific moments of her life in order to teach us an essential lesson about rape culture. If she'd really been raped and had the college and police refuse to help her, her action would seem brave and selfless. Since feminists do believe her story they must praise her art.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 06:59 PM
1

The artist's suffering is what makes it powerful art. I think she'll get a big payday from the mattress.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 06:54 PM
1

Exactly. Paid off so very well for that other one. Half million in cash donations, Person of the Year award, lucrative public speaking career, endless media attention throughout the western world, etc.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 06:34 PM
2

Pretty sure mainstream media will cover 'abusive' comments. She's carefully engineering exactly the sort of response that can launch a feminist's career. They may be crazy, but they aren't stupid and are master manipulators.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 06:28 PM
16

Provoking a violent response is I think one of their reasons for attending. We all know how they benefit from even made up email abuse;any real world abuse would be a significant victory for them.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 04:25 PM
-1

Feminists love to lie;false accusations of all sorts are one of their primary tools. The patriarchy and rape culture ideas are themselves false accusations so it really is a fundamental tool of feminism.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:32 PM
15

Usually if customers are bigoted and don't want to be served by staff of some hated group the customers are understood to need diversity training. But instead this shop makes efforts to train staff to suit the bigotry of their customers. Sickening perversion of the principles underlying diversity promotion.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 08:23 PM
1

Be very careful about reporting to the police. In many areas police have an arrest-the-man policy because it is assumed that women are at greater risk of harm. I'd suggest documenting everything and slowly extricating yourself from the relationship. If you can make her think it's her idea you have a better chance of avoiding retaliatory strikes from her.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 02:43 AM
1

Very revealing that the article says it is 'sad' that not all countries have this pro-female age gap.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 02:32 AM
2

Having her husband get a vasectomy also serves to preserve his future earnings for her and her children's use in the event of divorce. Since you won't be having any other children even if you might want to after she gained custody following divorce, she won't have a second family competing for your income. You can bet she and her circle of pals have talked out that option too.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 01:40 AM
0

I wish you were right but it's been legal to discriminate against men in Canada since the mid 1980s.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:06 PM
0

The legislation depriving canadian men of rights canadian women have has far broader impact than one day of bike shop access. We should be opposed on principle to laws depriving people of rights based on sex. It's shameful that canadian feminists are so dedicated to sexual discrimination. The rest of us left that behind decades ago.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:03 PM
2

It is very much about rights. Other people have a legislatively entrenched right to be free from sex discrimination while he doesn't.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 05:57 PM
2

I have not seen people behave like her since I was eight years old and spent most of my time with other eight year olds. It's incredible that such childish taunting, ridicule and exclusivity is being displayed by adults in positions of relative power.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 05:47 PM
-2

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the legislation permitting discrimination against men, was passed in the mid 1980s;it's not a matter of becoming, it's what's been for decades.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:24 AM
7

Be sure to have witnesses and preferably recorded video if you do anything to anger those feminists. They can react with lies and violence with impunity, and evidence is the only that will keep you from being arrested if they do attack.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:11 AM
1

That is awful. They thank the bigoted volunteers who refuse to work with men, and ignore the non-bigoted volunteers.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:08 AM
1

The problem here is that the government wrote entrenched legislation allowing the shop's discriminatory actions. Before that legislation men as well as women had the right to be free from sex discrimination. Government made the problem and only government can un-make it.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:02 AM
9

Then they will call the police and one way or another you still won't be getting in the shop: "He made our customers feel unsafe!" If they have to lie to the police they will. But you probably have a sense of honour so you won't lie and insist to the police that you are transgender.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:56 AM
7

Many women truly love their privilege, the more undeserved the better because it proves how special, how inherently valuable they are.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:49 AM
2

Is this stuff really just starting in some places? Man free spaces have been the norm on canadian campuses for thirty years. It's so well established it seems acceptable even to me. Maybe I need deprogramming.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:43 AM
2

Frankly I think anyone who needs to be taught ought to go into some other field. All you need is a computer, some kind of software toolset, perhaps some documentation, and interest.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 08:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter