TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GREATBIGDICK Archive

View 2 posts and 385 comments by GREATBIGDICK on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I still am not following. This is someone else's tumblr?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:17 AM
5

I actually left academia about eight years ago, not quite because of feminism per se, but because of the politicking and ass-kissing it took to get anywhere. Best thing I ever did, IMO.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:16 AM
3

So true. It is a crying shame the way the USA treats its veterans.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:14 AM
-6

By that measure, "lying about" and "being actually raped" are apples and oranges. But you're never going to acknowledge that, because matriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:12 AM
1

Noncivilians, you mean?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:10 AM
1

Right, I was just pointing out that the majority of respondents were white men.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:09 AM
-1

Were you really raped? Making false accusations like that is NOT COOL. Further, http://bit.ly/tQzTQZ
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:08 AM
-6

lying about someone else stealing and having him sent to prison is, I think, worse You're assuming all or even most "lying about someone else stealings" end in prosecution or prison. When you're raped, you lose your autonomy for a brief period of time, and then you suddenly get to make a lot of decisions on how you're going to move on. Brief? So the damage associated with a rape ends the moment a dick pulls out, the moment a hand removes itself from an arm or a throat, the moment a vagina decide…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:04 AM
2

FINALLY.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:00 AM
-5

So rape heals quickly? As quickly as a punch? And all rapes end in someone going to jail? And the mental anguish of going to jail wrongly is greater than being actually raped?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 12:59 AM
7

That shit gets scabby hanging out the door like that.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 09:28 PM
-8

This comment is ridiculous. It is also sarcastic and therefor a violation of Men's Rights MOD POLICY. I would be on the lookout from a nasty message from Gareth or Ignatious if I were you.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 09:27 PM
2

When I see a guy in a really awesome hotrod or classic car (often huge), I see a man who appreciates beauty in machinery. When I see a guy in a ridiculously over-sized late model pickup truck with Truck Nutz, I assume he is compensating for something. When I see a guy (or woman) in a Hummer, I assume s/he is just an asshole.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 09:26 PM
0

You claim to have murdered 14 people, but a knife gives you the willies? I'm sorry, but I'm not believing even a little bit of your story.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 09:22 PM
-25

rape is bad, but lying about being raped is just as bad. Stealing is bad, but lying about being stolen from is just as bad. Hitting someone is bad, but lying about being hit is just as bad. Having cancer is bad, but lying about having cancer is just as bad. Having a car accident is bad, but lying about having a car accident is just as bad. Being murdered is bad, but lying about being murdered is just as bad. Protip: none of those "lying about" things are actually "just as bad as" the things they…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 09:19 PM
1

So your sample: Most of the respondents were white male men feels that women hold the most privilege. Shocking. I wish you would have shared the other P-ratings. For example, it's not surprising that white men/MRAs feel that women are more privileged, but I would be curious to see the results for, say, transgendered people, blacks, gays & lesbians, etc.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 09:16 PM
1

I'll have to re-read the results. It came off like 3.9 on a scale of 5 viewed mena s privileged vs 4.6 (or whatever) women.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:07 PM
2

For privelege value there is a likert scale ranking of 1-7. 7 is perfect and 1 is very disadvantaged, whereas 4 is neutral or not sure. The different questions asked what ranking people would assign to men, women and lgbt people in their own society in terms of privilege and rights. So it was basically self-reporting, and not a calculation of, say, various components of "privilege"?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:46 PM
1

So basically this goes back to the every day argument of false allegations, double standards, and what's really, really rape. I'm not much interested in that conversation.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:44 PM
1

What is the methodology for privilege value? How can most have an income of under $10,0000 when STEM and CS are the most highly represented fields? Thanks.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:29 PM
-1

Between 1880 and 1930, close to 200 women were murdered by lynch mobs in the American South. Many more were tarred and feathered, burned, whipped, or raped. In this brutal world of white supremacist politics and patriarchy, a world violently divided by race, gender, and class, black and white women defended themselves and challenged the male power brokers. Crystal Feimster breaks new ground in her story of the racial politics of the postbellum South by focusing on the volatile issue of sexual vi…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:24 PM
2

I was simply pointing out that if the roles were reversed, social blackmailing would be a very legitimate reason to prosecute for rape. If I tell a woman "have sex with me or I'm going to tell person X that you did Y", then I have commited rape. I don't think it would be so clear cut, no matter what the gender of the alleged victim and alleged perpetrator. You allege it would be impossible to prosecute a woman for doing this - I contest that it would be difficult and possibly impossible to convi…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:20 PM
-1

It's understandable if you have never actually seen one in your pathetic life. ;)
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:14 PM
3

If the offender actually threatened social blackmail, then it is rape. If there were no threats and the victim simply feared this outcome on their own, but consented to the sex, it is not rape. I don't think roles need to be reversed. If a woman or man committed blackmail (which would legally need to be proven) in order to obtain quasi-consensual sex, she or he may be guilty of rape. Sounds like the OP is using a bunch of strawpeople, though. It's surprisingly easy not to accidentally rape someo…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:56 PM
-1

LOLOL! U mad bro?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:53 PM
-1

I agree that it should be no big deal for men to wear skirts, but I will admit that I have an acquaintance that does this and when I see him wearing a skirt I find it totally ridiculous.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:47 PM
0

See! My point. You prove it. Thanks! :)
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:39 PM
1

This is like saying racial discrimination is caused by telling those who are not white that they are going to have a tougher time, that life is going to be harder for them. So basically, racial discrimination (in this example) is caused by...telling the truth?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:38 PM
1

I have a bit of a theory that perhaps it is the constant talk everywhere about sexism and how woman are objectified. This is like saying racial discrimination is caused by people talking about racism. It simply doesn't make any sense.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 03:28 PM
-3

I know, right! I am so glad racism is over now.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 03:25 PM
-1

How can you be so sure? You think any 30-something, middle or upper-middle-class professional would have gotten anything much more than what Kennedy got? Sure, it probably would've taken longer, but I have friends and acquaintances that have done almost as bad and gotten off with a slap on the wrist. This was also decades before MADD lobbying and legislation.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 02:54 PM
-2

As a liberal who mostly votes Democrat and has spoken to a Republican before, I am well-aware of Chappaquiddick. Would Ted Kennedy have gotten the same treatment Ted Kennedy got, were he a young African-American man? That is the true question.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 02:23 PM
9

That would be wrong and immoral, but I don't know that it could be prosecuted as rape.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 02:20 PM
2

It's a good start. It's my understanding in web design, that you shouldn't really have to scroll down much on the firstpage, so perhaps you could shorten your introduction and present the remaining information in links under issues?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:14 PM
1

So if that's the wallpaper, where are any desktop icons?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:07 PM
5

It depends on what you mean by "afraid of the repercussions." If there's a threat of violence, a significant age disparity (such as between a teacher and a student), blackmail or other coercion, it could be. If a party consents to sex simply because they might get made fun of or something if they don't, probably not.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:05 PM
-1

They just usually happen to be one sex and ethnicity.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:02 PM
0

Unless you are a CEO. Or a politician. Of course then you are not middle-class, I guess.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:28 AM
1

That's great.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:27 AM
0

It's very perplexing why you were banned.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:24 AM
-5

There were three reported. That is the only one reversed.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:46 AM
-6

I like how you admit to wanting to ban me for reporting a violation of TOS to admins. But what about my free speech?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:41 AM
-6

Well that was really sudden. I wonder what could have brought that on? It certainly couldn't be that mods here wouldn't properly moderate submissions and got called out by Reddit admins. No, Gareth, I'm not a troll and I'm not trolling. I've been posting here and elsewhere for a few weeks. My comments are well within the guidelines of moderation policy, and when I say Men's Rights Activists are just like Ghandi, I mean it - we are just like Ghandi.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:23 AM
-2

Governments doing it and private parties do it are different monsters altogether. I have no objection, so long as both parties consent to be recorded. Unless you are fine with secret filming of bathrooms, dressing rooms, locker rooms, and bedrooms. I'm not.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:18 AM
-4

How about you do it and tell me what you see?
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:59 PM
-6

Top/Hot The "stop false rape accusations" PSA poster has made some people want to get violent with /r/mensrights (i.imgur.com) New Since everyone here believes in gender equality, someone should create a poll to prove it. (Which can be linked to & shown to uninformed people.) (self.MensRights)
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:47 PM
-5

Um: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/wroes/hueypriest_has_moderated_our_subreddit_apparently/
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:36 PM
1

Education? Children? Type of family growing up? (i.e., single parent, two-parent, gay parents, grandparents, other relatives, foster, other.) U.S. region?
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:32 PM
-2

From what I've gathered, gender equalty means different things to different people.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:31 PM
-7

I don't like that site either.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:30 PM
-1

No. If it matters that much to someone to take action by recording on video or voice, consent should be gained, unless there is a warrant.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:28 PM
-8

So lets not even try then? I mean if my phone number and address can be gotten out of a phone book - A FREE PHONE BOOK - then why should I have any expectation of privacy on the internet.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:26 PM
-6

Whatever you say buddy.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:12 PM
-13

So that immature dipshits like you don't get on there, harrass them and dox them. Just b/c you don't care about your own privacy doesn't mean no one else does.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 07:23 PM
-1

Wow. Way to work on the hard issues, Mens Rights. C-Ya.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 04:05 PM
-6

Having safe sex and being responsible != being "held acountable for."
/r/MensRights18/07/12 04:03 PM
-1

you do all the shit jobs women don't want Like what? Ass wiping in indigent care homes? Because I'm pretty sure it's mostly women that do that. I'm of the opinion that no one should really "need" anyone else.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:39 PM
-9

STOP POSTING PEOPLE'S SCREEN NAMES/REAL NAMES
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:38 PM
0

Right. Just like if you're drunk and rape a person, then you're still responsibile for your actions. If you're drunk and hit another vehicle/person/pedestrian, you are still responsible for your actions. If, however, you are a drunk pedestrian and you are walking on the sidewalk to your house and a drunk driver hits you, the fact that you were drunk is totally irrelevant.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:37 PM
-7

Sex should not be something to be "held accountable" for, IMO.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:35 PM
-2

I believe having real names associated with social networking is against Reddit's TOS. It is best to do screenshots with names blurred out.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:35 PM
-11

If a woman approaches either drunk or drugged wanting sex, will you actually deny it? Yes. Because I'm not a scumbag nor am I a rapist.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:28 PM
-9

I really don't know if it's a good idea to post all this here without scrubbing out your name and the names of the other Twitter users.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:27 PM
11

A straw man and a straw women walk into a bar. They rape each other. Straw bartender says, "I didn't see that cumming."
/r/MensRights18/07/12 01:19 AM
-4

So a man who is 6' 2" and 210 lbs; a man who is 5' 5" and 165 lbs; a woman who is 5' 9" 160 lbs are all held to the same standard? Who do you imagine is the weakest link in them?
/r/MensRights18/07/12 01:15 AM
0

Actually, nothing you just said make sense. It would really help if you used proper capitalization, punctuation, sentence structure, etc. Not being a smartass here - it is really difficult to follow the point you're trying to make in the manner that you put it.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 01:13 AM
2

I think you're really stretching here, dude. Slut-shaming means that you are passing judgement on someone who has consensual sex with an involved partner. What you are probably referring to as creep-shaming (rolls my eyes) is passing judgement on someone who engages in nonconsentual "sexual" behavior, though this sexual behavior, due to its nonconsentual nature, is actually just your run-of-the-mill intimidation and harassment. If you have a problem with your girlfriend and her other female frie…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 09:10 PM
-2

If men and women are equal yet different, why should physical requirements not also reflect that? For example, make them based upon height and weight rather than gender.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 08:52 PM
0

I agree with this. I don't see how being a woman captain makes any of what she has to say more legitimate.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 08:50 PM
8

You're not obligated to do so, but she may very well take you back to have it readjusted. My brother pays child support and child care is part of that. He will spend money on his daughter when he has her, but does not give additional money to the mother. Most daycares should have sliding-scale or subsidized services. You should check into those in your area
/r/MensRights17/07/12 08:47 PM
0

As in people who do things TO others without consent are scum (i.e., catcallers, harassers, etc) and deserve any shame they get. People who do things WITH others, with consent (i.e., fucking) are fine and don't deserve to be shamed.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 07:33 PM
6

You're too stupid to argue with. Look up come CDC statistics and then come back and tell me that all women are filthy whores.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:18 PM
-3

Sexual objectification, catcalling, harrassment - you do understand that none of those behaviors require two-party consent and participation, right?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:17 PM
-6

I'm...not arguing anything with you...
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:14 PM
6

LOL, reported. Shitty comment, ad hominem, and sexist.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:09 PM
-5

The person I quoted was speaking specifically about the court of public opinion, which is what I quoted and addressed.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:08 PM
-4

I don't see what business it is of yours, firstly. Who gives a shit.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:23 PM
11

most girls these days are quite diseased And somehow that doesn't apply to men who take women home from bars willy-nilly? So she can track you down and claim you raped her or gave her a baby? Better to stay anonymous if you're going to play that game, and pay only with cash at the bar so you're mostly untraceable. You don't need crazy party girls stalking you. You are fucking stupid. Better to know early on and theoretically have some kind of say in it than be stuck with surprise arrears years d…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:21 PM
7

am I totally off-base for making that assumption? Yes. And pills don't protect against STDs, which you should probably be more careful about picking up women at clubs. Now she's off to get the morning after pill but I doubt it will be effective The sooner the better, yes, but it is said to be effective 3 days later, and even as many as 5 days. Next plans: How best to secure an abortion, if the Plan B fails. Look into clinics in your state (provided you are in the U.S.) or neighboring states, cal…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:19 PM
-12

I am quoting and directly replying to Donkey_Schlong, who is angry that the "entire country" is calling for the "heads of the Penn State administration." Salary and stature are relevant and fair game - no one wanted to touch Sandusky or go forward with anything, despite years' worth of knowledge of abuse going on, specifically because he and his bosses were so wealthy and powerful, and he brought so much to the school in the way of athletics. THAT IS WHY THE WHOLE COUNTRY IS ANGRY ABOUT IT. Yes,…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:10 PM
-1

Okay, so he hasn't been sentenced yet, but was convicted? Are you arguing that Sundusky deserves a lesser sentence, or that his sentence is appropriate but the teacher deserves more?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:07 PM
-12

The entire country is calling for the heads of the Penn State administration, and no one is saying a fucking word about the female monster. Did teachers aides, principals, and school board administrators participate in a systemic cover-up of wrongdoing by the teacher? No? Did she and her staff make millions of dollars per yer? No? Well not quite the same, then, is it?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:57 PM
2

Has Jerry Sandusky been found guilty and sentenced yet? As I understood it, new witnesses and alleged victims are still coming forward.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:55 PM
2

I believe this has posted here at least once before.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:54 PM
0

That would be called a newborn.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:54 PM
0

So...women only care about men that have money. Okay then. Have fun in Australia, where I am sure the women are totally different.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:04 PM
0

I tihnk there is a sub reddit called MRMemes or something.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 02:36 PM
1

The more I think about that "ad campaign" the more disgusted I become. I wonder who their client was. I do think advertising and marketing are important in getting help to underserved groups, but this seems way too clever.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:38 PM
1

Ok. Whatever.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:37 PM
1

And what about sociopathic men alone? I just think it's really stupid to speak as though only women with mental illness are capable of violence. It extends far beyond that.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:36 PM
2

I'm convinced that 25% of slacktivism in this subreddit is people getting pissed off over what is in the dictionary.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:35 PM
-6

I am really not following you here - are you saying you are jealous of your brother because he is more financially stable and has a wife/children, while you have to pay for prostitutes? Maybe I am missing something, but that sounds an awful lot like you are saying. I don't think affection is really a "right." It may be a need, as most all humans do need nurturing and affection at some time, but I do not see it as a "right."
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:34 PM
1

It's really hard to say. I would hope in the next 50 years, it becomes more than simply a loose organization of people on the internet.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:31 PM
1

I hope you are posting this as a joke. While I am 110% for suicide prevention efforts, especially those targeted towards men, this "real men" shit and calling it "man therapy" seems incredibly stupid and reductive. Humor is great and all, but it is no substitute for actual mental health treatment. Edit: More proof that this is a garbage marketing gimmick - http://sharpideas.com/blog/post/4986/page/1
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:23 PM
1

LOL.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:21 PM
2

I would venture to guess that psychopathic men are dangerous to women, children, and other men alike. This is a really terrible link.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 02:06 AM
-4

Out of curiosity, why do you have so many accounts?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 02:04 AM
1

That's what I was thinking - that most IQ tests were strongly gender and racially biased. Someone who is immensely knowledgeable and talented with music or art but not science and math is just as important to the world, IMO.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 12:52 AM
0

Hasn't it long been supposed that "IQ tests" really don't count for anything and are not an accurate diagnostic tool for intelligence?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 11:43 PM
0

I look forward to all the lessons you have to offer, guy who can't differentiate between a fetus and a child.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 11:40 PM
0

How does your brother have a record?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 09:17 PM
2

I'm curious as to what you want cleared. You mention nothing of any sort of arrest, being charged with a crime, or anything. He would have been a minor at the time these allegations took place, so he wouldn't have a record anyway (at least in the USA.) Finally, what does "sex-crazed" mean or even have to do with anything? Are you making the claim that the mother molested the daughter? It's not very clear, and lots of this post doesn't really make sense.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:37 PM
1

The first sensible thing I've read all day.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:31 PM
1

Sorry. I can't "be civil" with crybabies who stick up for a guy beating his wife in the face, who call said women "cunts" and "cuckolding bitch."
/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:02 PM
1

See, what you're doing here is completely removing context from what happened, as well as over emphasising what he did by splitting it up into those three things, which really makes it seem as though this guy beat the shit out of his wife. The fact is that he didn't. He got really angry, and punched her once in the mouth (a fucking stupid thing to do, nobody is denying that) and immediately regretted it. I can't claim to know what actually happened, all I know is what this guy is saying, and bas…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:47 PM
-2

http://www.factcheck.org/2010/04/the-abortion-issue/ I would assume the $90 figure is for women who are somehow able to qualify under Medicaid for medical abortion or get subsidies from local abortion funds. http://www.womensmed.com/faqs/faq/#17 Up to $3,000 for the abortion alone, not counting travel, etc. Health care in general, gasoline, food, clothing, and utilities have all increased in cost in the last 10-20 years, I see no reason why abortion care wouldn't.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:39 PM
1

Check the sidebar. Or Google. I don't know of any readily available for the UK.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:09 PM
-4

Awesome citations using data that is 10-20 years old. As for keeping legs closed, I guess it's only fair for us to keep it in our pants.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:05 PM
0

I know. I was totally out of line in saying this guy who PUNCHED HIS WIFE IN THE FACE, BLOODIED HER LIPS, and BROKE HER TOOTH was a spouse abuser. I don't know what I could've been thinking. (P.S. You might be an asshole if you say things like "cunt wife" and "cuckolding.")
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:04 PM
1

You are the one who started in with the bit regarding a fingernail, as though being punched in the face is no big deal at all and it's so very easy to break a tooth.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:02 PM
-3

Do you think he should not be able to force her to abstain from drinking while pregnant with his child? That is correct. It is not "his child." It is a fetus inside HER BODY, and, when born, will be "her child" as well as "his." That fact that you refer to it as "his" child is pretty telling, IMO.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:51 PM
-5

We see how quickly Celda crumbles when challenged.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:48 PM
-1

If a man punched another man, once, felt so much remorse for it, and clearly regrets doing it, would you be as obsessed with calling this guy a 'piece of shit' and an abuser? If the man was in a dating relationship or domestic partnership with another man, yes, I would be. You know full well that the dynamics of domestic violence are much different than punching some guy at a bar or whatever, though it all probably does boil down to his sense of stepped-upon masculinity. If I'm being a white kni…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:48 PM
-5

$350 Ha. Where? motel rooms can be had for as little as $50 Again, where? Even in my small town, they are more than that. Most clinics are in cities. suck it the fuck up. Compelling argument.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:45 PM
-6

Wow dude. You are just horrible. Do you know what a "financial abortion" before pregnancy is? Get a fucking vasectomy.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:43 PM
1

Why share the information if it has no relevance?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:42 PM
-6

hey also aren't as problematic as you suggest. there's this thing called the middleground...honestly, when you can have an abortion for less than a $1000 with very minimal resistance, i don't get what the issue is. Of course, you're not counting the time and money it takes to travel, having to pay for a hotel room or rooms due to paternalistic informed consent laws, etc. Perhaps you live in one of those lucky states that doesn't have these barriers.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:06 PM
2

I really have no strong feelings about it - i.e., I am neither glad nor angry that I am circumcised. I don't think parents should choose to circumcise their sons, but I also don't think they should get their ears pierced either. Whether it should be banned (or a crime), I'm on the fence about. I do think it's hyperbole to call it male genital mutilation however. My friend's wife is a pediatrician and encourages parents not to circumcise, so maybe the tide is turning.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:04 PM
0

Yes. I broke my tooth once skateboarding. This woman happened to break her tooth by accidentally hitting it with her husband's fist. Surprisingly easy.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:00 PM
-1

I don't give a fuck. I don't give a fuck that he was REALLY MAD and she was CHEATING ON HIM and now he's VERY VERY SORRY. This man abused his wife, full stop, and you and others here are DEFENDING HIM.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:59 PM
-5

Abortion actually kills a fetus, financial abortion exists before a fetus is created. How is "financial abortion" even possible before a pregnancy? Abortion access is only difficult in some "red" states; further, in countries where abortion is paid for by the government and freely accessible (Canada, England) financial abortion is still illegal. And this changes my argument how? Why, it's almost as though sensible governments view abortion access and bodily autonomy separately from mythical cont…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:58 PM
-9

So all unplanned pregnancies are as a result of women lying about being on birth control, abortion laws are hunky dory, forcing women to undergo invasive (costly, and dangerous) medical testing early in a pregnancy is fine, and blah blah blah blah. Ok.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:18 PM
-6

I think that 3rd bullet point is stupid since, if a woman decides to birth and parent, it is also the man's responsibility. I see so many posts on here deriding women for getting an abortion without permission, or women relinquishing child for adoption without permission, or women parenting children and expecting child support, and I think that men can't have it both ways. You can't both want a say in it and want to walk away without recourse.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:15 PM
-2

Yeah? I'm thinking mostly column A, what with the 20 downvotes I've received in the last 10 minutes. I don't buy tone arguments at all.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 03:42 PM
18

1 - Abortion deals with a fetus, while "LPS" or "financial surrender" deals with a child. They are incomparable. 2 - State and federal laws make accessing abortion, both physically and financially, extremely difficult for women. 3 - While many MR advocates claim that a woman deciding to birth/parent the child is "forcing" a man into a situation he doesn't want to be in (i.e., fathering, child support), "LPS" or "financial surrender" simply shifts the burden of being forced into an unwanted situa…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 03:18 PM
0

What a valuable way to spend your time, talents, and and resources. Especially as an MR activist.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:47 PM
-48

Really? I'd say it's a little bit of column A, a little bit of column B.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:23 PM
2

Cracker gypsies?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:50 PM
2

Upvoted because 1) you are mostly correct and 2) you got spite downvotes even though you're not being inflammatory.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:50 PM
2

I truly don't understand why we get caught up in drama involving feminist subreddits. Why do people from here post there, then x-post links to it here?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:49 PM
-6

You're absolutely right. There are myriad other reasons, too.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:44 PM
-72

It is very popular. It is also bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:43 PM
0

This guy is either a troll or a huge fucking scumbag. Either way, we should not be chumming up with him.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:41 PM
-1

And? Does that somehow make it okay for everyone everywhere to punch other people in the face, then?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:39 PM
0

Really? Cheating + temper = hit your spouse in the face? Not from where I'm standing.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:39 PM
-6

Oh - so he's even a worse piece of shit than I initially thought.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:39 PM
0

He admitted to bloodying her lip. Sounds like "beaten up" to me.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:38 PM
5

That's cuz he's a liar.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:03 AM
-6

And? Committing assault doesn't make the car reappear.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:02 AM
3

I still think you're a troll. Post a picture of yourself in the Corvette saying "Hi /MensRights!" While you're at it, why not post a picture of your wife's beaten up face?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:00 AM
-18

Why are you so obsessed with her?
/r/MensRights15/07/12 08:04 PM
0

Gebdoe is really stretching it.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 12:58 AM
0

Yes. They traveled from Vegas to the Academy. When they got there, the school had already decided not to fuck with that mess. The marriage was already done. He had already intentionally circumvented the court order.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:21 PM
0

Men are likelier to commit suicide by violent and definitive means.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:19 PM
-2

So you'r blaming the daughter he hit in the face on his suicide? Nice.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:14 PM
-1

What dangerous, dirty work do you do all day? I sit in an air-conditioned office and type on the computer.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:11 PM
0

Proof? That was not in the article I read (the one linked).
/r/MensRights14/07/12 05:30 PM
5

That's a good point. Most of my male friends rarely, if ever, go to the doctor, even when they're in bad shape. When they finally do go it ends up being even worse (letting chest colds get as bad as bronchitis and pneumonia). I grew up with a very sick father, so I never really had the "walk it off" mentality instilled into me, but I know others do. There is also the matter of the terrible economy and so many men being unemployed and thus, not having insurance, then being unable or unwilling to …
/r/MensRights14/07/12 03:48 AM
1

You purposefully posted this with an inflammatory title, hoping to get people outraged at the hypocrisy of letting a woman in the workplace post that shit up at her desk. You got called on the fact that not only was it a repost (not in and of itself a big deal) but it was also an office prank. Don't try to play ignorant or innocent. No one is that stupid. Stay in the silent majority, then, if your only purpose here is to troll.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 03:42 AM
1

You purposefully posted this with an inflammatory title, hoping to get people outraged at the hypocrisy of letting a woman in the workplace post that shit up at her desk. You got called on the fact that not only was it a repost (not in and of itself a big deal) but it was also an office prank. Don't try to play ignorant or innocent. No one is that stupid. Stay in the silent majority, then, if your only purpose here is to troll.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 03:42 AM
-1

They went there AFTER THEY MARRIAGE. It was AFTER THE MARRIAGE that the academy said they would not admit him. You are wrong, and I stand by my statement. I can't believe you're defending someone who is using his son as a pawn in his vendetta against his ex. If a woman did this, you would not be singing the same tune, for sure.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 03:40 AM
1

TL;DR: Nothing to see here, move along. If you see nothing hypocritical and fallacious about your post, I won't waste my time dismantling the mess.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 03:35 AM
1

Handy!
/r/MensRights14/07/12 03:34 AM
2

How did it show that they need to make sacrifices in a relationship? Further, I think that's a pretty lousy message for girls (and boys) anyway. I also disagree that you "NEED to be tough for the sake of others and to do otherwise is utterly selfish." I mean, really? What the hell? We as men are told this ALL THE TIME and it's bullshit. It is not selfish to look out for your own mental and emotional health, and it's not selfish to grieve, which is what the mother was doing. At any rate, I really…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 09:50 PM
85

Pathetic. Thanks for confirming.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 08:22 PM
2

It's not hard. I'd never even posted there and got banned.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 08:01 PM
-4

Well it did sound like he was doing everything in his power to circumvent the law, go against court orders, and used his kid as a pawn in the process.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 08:01 PM
3

Same here. And I'll hold the door for another man just as easily. I did pay for my girlfriend's and my first date together since I asked her out, but she got the next one and we've taken turns ever sense. Works out fine as far as I can tell.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:58 PM
1

I was just curious about the rest of MR's thoughts on this video. Thank you.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:55 PM
1

I don't think she's a feminist hero, or any hero. She's a just a woman who married a man and is now divorcing him. I'd say any man or woman who has a partner that is high-up in a powerful religious organization would probably have a hard time leaving that spouse, and would need to do whatever they must in order to leave safely. No one is asking you to nominate her for hero status, but I think you're really going over-the-top in your allegations that she is deceptive and vindictive.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:44 PM
1

THE STUPID OMFG IT BURNS. Later.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:33 PM
8

Dude. Have you read any sort of accounts from ex-Scientologists? I think there was one linked on Reddit a couple of years ago that was absolutely horrifying. A young adult male (teenager maybe?) attempted to leave, was restrained, and was finally able to get away with absolutely nothing. I'm sorry, but I'm not going to begrudge a woman for "keeping Cruise in the dark about where she was and what she was doing" while getting help from her family and legal counsel, considering she could very well …
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:20 PM
1

You've not once proven anyone has tried to ruin his livelihood, not to mention that would be all but impossible. Honestly - and I know this will be very risky thing to say here - I think that a lot of people here are rushing to defend Daniel Tosh or paint him as a victim in a way they would not if he were a woman comedian, feminist, etc., especially as it pertains to claims of trampling free speech, ruining incomes, etc., and frankly it disgusts me. While I am admittedly no fan of Tosh or his "c…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:15 PM
2

I'm not really sure. I guess so.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:06 PM
12

I'd say it's tasteless either way, and while it may not fly in your office (bikini girl posters) I have worked both blue and white collar jobs in which other guys I worked with had just what you described. Obviously nothing topless, but shots from SI Swimsuit Edition pictorials and fashion/cosmetics ad campaigns. The worst was when I worked in a power plant though. I was honestly surprised with what some of the guys in the maintenance and instrument shops got away with - pretty lurid calendars &…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:45 PM
1

It's not wrong. It's not like he's a private figure they just have it out for. He is a celebrity with multiple platforms on which to do his "comedy."
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:40 PM
1

Daniel Tosh will never be pushed out of his career or job (i.e., show business). He's not going to have to resort to selling cars or waiting tables at any point in his life, unless he happens to develop some serious drug, alcohol, or gambling problems.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:27 PM
6

I may be wrong, but I don't think it is able to identify IMGRUR pictures.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:56 PM
131

OP isn't responding for at least two comments asking if this is his actual office. Until he says otherwise, I am assuming it is something he found on the interwebs of someone whose cubicle got trolled.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:29 PM
2

Yup. And it is specifically a circle jerk.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:28 PM
5

There are a number of women like this in the local jail.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:15 PM
2

The ability to deceive your spouse Huh?
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:14 PM
3

Well I'm really glad you are not going around bombing women's rights activists, if that's even any kind of standard to have for perspective.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:10 PM
8

1 Is this for real or did someone's desk get trolled? 2 If for real, do you work with this person? 3 If for real, I like how the pictures cover up what I presume to be her kids' pictures.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:08 PM
-1

Did Jerry Sandusky get raped???
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:06 PM
2

But in the same sense, none of us are organizing to put the feminists out of business. They can believe what they want and we hope to change their minds(at least I do) but I do not aim to make them homeless or unhireable afterwards. That is absolutely not true in a lot of senses. Movements and boycotts are organized routinely against advertisers and products with an anti-boy or anti-man message. I also recall two feminist bloggers losing their jobs as a result of pressure and lobbying from a rig…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:30 PM
1

That doesn't change the point being made by myself or by Wide_420, and I know exactly what is meant by "yours[sic] sons are are dying in wars."
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:04 PM
1

I can't watch the video. 1) Is this in the USA or Japan. 2) Are they calling for government regulation? 3) Are they calling for imprisoment? 4) I was referring to "should be done" as in the backlash against Tosh, not video games. No one is saying Tosh or his vein of "comedy" should be banned or that he should be imprisoned.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:42 PM
0

but its not right for people to be attacking the man for working Yeah. That's exactly what people are doing. /s
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:20 PM
2

Well even the little things matter.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 01:57 PM
8

Listen. I feel like I am on the same page with at least 80% of things that are posted here, but I really feel like shit like this is dishonest and reductive. There are posts here all the fucking time about "company made a sexist ad about dads" or "a feminist somewhere said violence against men doesn't happen" or "this woman's music video is misandrist." Am I to believe I shouldn't care about anything like that because men die in wars? (And of course, women also die in wars, but I guess men are w…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 01:51 PM
-6

I'm not a feminist, and I wouldn't quite say I'm butthurt about any of it, but I do think Tosh is scum. And also horribly unfunny.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 01:45 PM
-14

if you put rape even in video games it should be immediately banned and the creators imprisoned. Yes. Because that's exactly what people are saying should be done.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 01:44 PM
-7

This is like getting mad that Chris Rock can say the n-word but you can't.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 01:44 PM
58

Ha! I appreciate a nice respite from the hard reading now and again.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 01:42 PM
2

But free speech!
/r/MensRights13/07/12 11:46 AM
3

This is a great victory for men's rights. The others shouldn't be far behind.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 11:42 AM
0

If he didn't want to be heckled, maybe he shouldn't be a comedian. (See how that works?) I really love how you're making him out to be some kind of victim, though.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 11:33 AM
-1

A great big one, even. But you still haven't shown me how fetuses are children or how children are aborted, or how an extracted fetus can continue to grow outside of a woman's womb. Fair is fair.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:54 AM
2

This makes no sense. How is prison rape not rape? I think someone who makes a joke about prison rape is de facto an asshole. So if a male audience member stood up and said something to a female comedian after she made a joke about prison rape, the female comedian would still be an asshole. How is someone calling a comedian out on being an asshole an infringement upon free speech? I think you don't have a great concept of what free speech means. Tosh did nothing illegal. You don't have to do some…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:52 AM
1

Then I shall return the favor.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:49 AM
1

How often do men get their penises cut off vs. how often do women get raped? Not including circumcision as an infant, but an assault by a peer, an intimate partner (male or female) or stranger of some sort.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 09:01 PM
-1

TL; DR
/r/MensRights12/07/12 09:00 PM
1

Yes, I do. Yes, I do.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 08:59 PM
-4

Prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 08:55 PM
-4

Females don't abort children. They abort fetuses. You can probably have the fetus after it is aborted though, if you still want it.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:51 PM
1

1) Thanks. I hadn't seen anything or anyone advocating outlawing Daniel Tosh's speech in particular or rape jokes in general, but then again I've only read a few reports on the whole incident. 2) I said "as squeeky clean in the circumstance as possible," not his character or image as a whole. Because most people would agree that even an asshole, unfunny schtick comedian can be out of line in telling someone to get gangraped (if that is what he said or implied.)
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:28 AM
3

you would have seen MANY people calling for legislation making rape jokes illegal speech. seriously, it was disturbing. Links? Quotes? Screenshots? i've yet to see proof he was an asshole in this instance. Welp. He is an asshole in everything I've ever seen him in. Including this scenario. I understand your reluctance to take into account something an anonymous blog poster wrote online, but club owner and Daniel Tosh both have very vested interest in making Daniel Tosh look as squeeky clean in t…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 08:54 PM
2

BITCHES BE SHOPPIN' AM I RIGHT? Seriously, why is this posted here. My Dad easily has spent as much, if not more, on clothing, cars, and golf clubs.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 08:02 PM
8

Tihs is a stupid argument, hardwarequestions. No one is saying that what Daniel Tosh said or did was illegal, or that it should be. They are saying he is a huge asshole, which he is.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 08:00 PM
4

What the club manager said in "setting the record straight" is sitll pretty awful, IMO.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 07:59 PM
2

I think you don't quite understand the concept of free speech, protected speech, or constitutional rights. The government did not shut down the guy's comedy routine or otherwise silence him. This is like saying if a member of the NAACP attended a KKK rally and caused a scene then blogged about it, that the KKK's rights were trampled. Sure, NAACP member knew what he was getting into, but still has every right to be opposed to what is said.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 07:58 PM
2

Disgusting. Here is a link to the real story if anyone is interested and doesn't want to give the bigoted, racist coverage at LiveLeak any hits: http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local/inland_empire&id=8729871
/r/MensRights11/07/12 07:55 PM
0

Privacy just entails too many problems. It's just one of those really uncomfortable truths that we have to accept one day. Sorry, but I'll risk it. I don't need the government monitoring my every move.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 07:11 PM
3

I guess you're just trying to be funny but: Notaries have specific rules applicable to them from state-to-state. I doubt any reputable one would actually do this, and if push came to shove and you found one that actually would, it would never hold up in court.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 05:10 PM
1

LOL, in college, my friends and I always called them "Dumbshit Murphy's" because the only people who seemed to like them were fake OI! punks and (oddly enough) frat boy types. I never really though of music as feminine or masculine, but I guess I would have to say Motorhead.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 05:08 PM
1

Really? I took it as a male (divorced husband) writing the ad. At any rate, I'm not extremely saddened by it as it is probably a joke post.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:53 PM
10

I agree with this. It sounds like a very positive campaign, epsecially if we are to insist that boy's rights and infant's rights (re: circumcision) are human rights.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:52 PM
5

I think this sounds like a troll. Can you send a screenshot of the FB message to Moderators privately for verification? I have major doubts that there exists a physician who would risk his or her medical license to create fraudulent documents for your "vasectomy." On the very off chance that this is not a troll (which I really doubt), confront your ex about the birth control (you don't owe anything to her or her sister to not bring it up), get paternity testing, consult an attorney to see if you…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 04:53 PM
4

1 - The title of the article is "Norwich prostitute and pimp jailed for robbing driver with rape threat" - Why did the OP change it to "A prostitute and her husband"? 2 - I am assuming the disparity in sentences may have something to do with the fact that Mr. Skoulding brandished a weapon. (re: HerpNeverDerps).
/r/MensRights10/07/12 02:50 PM
2

I am interested in including an element in the film about how excessive feminism may play into this cultural phenomenon, particularly in America. Honestly I think the politicization undermines your project's integrity, unless you also intend to go to a feminist Reddit and ask them how other factors or the MR movement contributed. Frankly the opinions of a bunch of people and how the system came to be flawed really shouldn't be at play unless they are experts in criminal law, legislation, constit…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 02:46 PM
1

Just the word boy? There's a whole lot of awful in that picture to unpack.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 02:42 PM
1

Not everyone can be so lucky as to be sperminated by the King of Rock and Roll.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:53 PM
1

Or being pretty certain the chamber is empty but knowing there's a possibility that you might actually not shoot a blank.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:51 PM
1

This could be even more helpful then the center opening itself. Actually, no, it couldn't. "Raising awareness" for things is never as good as actually taking action.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:50 PM
1

So do you think anyone who embraces patriarchy theory and other feminist frameworks/narratives should be severely harassed and threatened? I too am a little confused by your post.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:36 AM
1

I would prefer WIC, etc., to pregnancy "alimony." And depending on what they called it, it could open the door for more ridiculous abortion restrictions.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:31 AM
5

I am not gay but in high school (where most bullying was done) was good friends with several closeted gay guys. Most all of their harassment, and the harshest of it (I am talking physical assault, homes and cars vandalized severely, etc.) came from other guys, but I did see it come from girls too, usually the girlfriends of the main bullies.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:30 AM
4

And think of all the men who have been beaten as a result of false rape allegations and so-called "street justice." It's not okay to take the law into your own hands, period.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:28 AM
2

I agree with this sentiment. The things people wrote to her were fucked up, but she should not have used violence.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:27 AM
2

I would like to contribute but am hesitant at doing so because I am not able to find any indication that this is a registered nonprofit organization in the state of OH. I definitely support the cause but am a bit hesitant at sending money to a man I don't know for a project that could theoretically be fraudulent or at the very least not on the up-and-up. Think you could get Mr. Peterson here to do an AMA perhaps, Zerbu?
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:24 AM
2

FYI, if you are using Firefox as your browser, there are a number of options that let you screen capture without using your keyboard's PrtScr (print screen) button. I believe I'm using Fireshot. It has a lot more functionality - you can save in various formats, text doesn't get obscured or blurried, you don't have to paste together various walls of texts since it screenshots the whole page, etc. That said, am I the only one who thinks it is weird that you are quoting yourself in the title?
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:21 PM
4

I will agree with that. I think it's a misandric double standard. In fact I have quit dating a woman before because she expressed that she was glad I was taller than her - can you imagine if I'd told her I was glad her boobs weren't too small or her ass wasn't too fat???
/r/MensRights09/07/12 08:50 PM
4

So is Rush Limbaugh. Of course, their being fat really has no bearing on the merits of what they say. So edgy!
/r/MensRights09/07/12 08:48 PM
4

Wow I had hoped that was a book written 30+ years ago but sadly it is very recent. Perhaps you could find better book recomendations from your wife's OB/GYN or the pediatrician you intend to use. The guy is a heart surgeon with a TV show. He's probably not the best expert on parenting matters from a health perspective.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 06:14 PM
-2

I do not know much, if anything about the "battered women's defense," but I would say that punching someone in the face out of anger for being cheated on is not very comparable to murdering a documented abusive spouse out of fear/self-defense. Edited to add this link I just found: http://libguides.law.gsu.edu/content.php?pid=110018&sid=829255 As I understand it, "battered women's defense" is typically only allowed to be admitted as a defense if the defendant was in the midst of imminent danger b…
/r/MensRights09/07/12 04:31 PM
4

Although now that I think about it, wouldn't it be more like playing Russian Roulette?
/r/MensRights09/07/12 01:12 PM
13

Never thought of it that way, but yes.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 11:43 AM
4

Scientists and medical researchers are working on this and making progress, but currently condoms and spermicide are the only contraceptives available to men.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 11:58 PM
5

If this is from your girlfriend, why did you post it here and then include a link that will surely amount to nothing but online harassment on her site?
/r/MensRights08/07/12 10:58 PM
2

You've been dating a much older man since you were a teenager and now he wants you to sign a contract that is weighted severely in his favor, even by his chosen attorney's own estimation? I don't know, this just smacks of controlling to me.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 10:57 PM
-9

Whatever helps you sleep at night, dude.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 08:06 PM
-4

I agree with you. I did not make a decision to hit my wife, I blinked and it had happened. And all other contradictory statements he's made that he "needs to own it."
/r/MensRights08/07/12 03:16 PM
-6

Yes you did. Quit trying to relienquish responsibility of your actions.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:47 PM
-10

LOL, yeah she's so fucking cruel. You beat her up for cheating on you, and she's the cruel one. GFY dude.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:46 PM
-11

You deserve to be charged with assault. If you want to save your car that is so important to you, then fess up to your own terrible actions as well.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:45 PM
4

Hard enough to give her a bloody lip and BREAK HER TOOTH. For reference, I broke my tooth skateboarding when I was a teenager, going down a huge hill at a high speed and faceplanting into the concrete after a trick.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:44 PM
2

An admission on the internets?
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:43 PM
2

You punched your wife in the mouth, bloodied her lip and broke her tooth? And you love your car more than life itself? My advice is to reassess your fucking priorities.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:43 PM
2

I appreciate you responding to my argument regarding being literally hooked up to a person's body vs. needing care and nurturing outside of the womb, rather than simply resorting to an ad hominem attack when you get proven wrong.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 06:40 PM
3

she made herself public on the internet. that is asking for abuse. Yeah ok.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 06:39 PM
2

Acting on sexual attraction in a way so as to put another person in their place, embarrass them, etc., is harassment, and yes, it si offensive and degrading. I can see you're being purposefully dense in order to defend "men" going out of their way to harass someone online and make/play a video game about beating said person up. Good for you.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 06:37 PM
1

I agree. I must have missed where they were attributing the reading/writing gap to biology. That's bunk.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 06:35 PM
-1

How have you noticed this? Are you a parent or a teacher? I am not being facetious, it has just been literally decades since I've been in school, so obviously I am out of touch.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:50 PM
2

Well it looks to be on clearance, so I doubt they're making/selling any more, just getting rid of remaining, poorly-selling stock.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 01:03 PM
1

FYI - This article was posted here before.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 01:01 PM
5

I know. It is very unnerving that she doesn't have eyebrows.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 01:00 PM
2

Evidently plenty of men lined up to join, as her project got fully funded and then some. What I take issue with is a woman, who has blogged and written about, and continues to do work about "sexism in gaming," having her point proven by a bunch of assholes who think it's funny or clever to make a game of her having the shit beat out of her. They specifically made this game because she dared talk about sexism in gaming. How is that not sexism and just "women complainging about video games...again…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:59 PM
-1

That is understandable, and reading and writing are very important skills to have as an adult in the professional world. I don't dispute that this significant gap is a problem. What I am curious about is why a narrowing gap is also a problem.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:56 PM
1

Sure further nurture and care is required, just like nurture and care is required for any severely ill or elderly person. This does not require them to be inside any other human being's body to survive - other people's services (often paid) and mechanisms are in place to do this nurturing. Your "pussy on a pedalstal" comment is hugely sexist not to mention stupid and irrelevant.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:56 PM
-1

In STEM the standards are lower?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:53 PM
3

She's the one who put herself and her opinion out there. If she hates men/masculinity/male sexuality so much she shouldn't be surprised if men hate her back. This concept is otherwise known as victim blaming. I am really surprised so many here are taking this track.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:53 PM
1

From another comment: Now if there was a video game revolving around beating women senseless there might be a problem. These guys MADE A VIDEO GAME ABOUT BEATING THE SHIT OUT OF A WOMAN BECAUSE SHE DARED CALLED THEM SEXIST.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:51 PM
1

Now if there was a video game revolving around beating women senseless there might be a problem. LOL.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:51 PM
3

Are you seriously arguing this? No matter what gender it is directed towards (and I have experienced it as a man) it is offensive and degrading. And what about the "Beat Up Anita Sarkeesian" game? Not sexist? Just a bunch of gamers that want to assault a woman because she made a Kickstarter about sexist gamers?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:50 PM
2

Potheads aren't exactly known for making the most sense.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 04:09 AM
3

YES. No-brainer.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 04:05 AM
-7

So it's a bad thing that the gap in math and science is narrowing?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 03:58 AM
2

I am new so I don't quite understand, but I've noticed a lot of posts about people here being against women who oppose sexism in video games. What, precisely, is wrong with women (or others) speaking out against bigotry in any form including video games? Do you really think this is beyond criticism: http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/internet/2012/07/what-online-harassment-looks
/r/MensRights07/07/12 03:50 AM
2

Can someone translate?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 03:47 AM
0

Yeah. The last bastion of conservatives.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 03:47 AM
2

Link? In the USA, it is not against the law to look for a particular-gender roommate.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 03:46 AM
2

Ha!!! Always glad to end the workweek with a smile.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 09:51 PM
1

I like how you also completely notice the tool that made the original post there. He's just as bad.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 09:43 PM
3

Are you talking about looking for an already occupied place looking for a roomate or an actual rental of your own?
/r/MensRights06/07/12 09:41 PM
2

I guess so. I am no fan of Michael Moore, personally.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 09:40 PM
1

My position runs counter to the idea that you are inherently guilty of something since conception. Which is precisely not what original sin is, but thanks for trying.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 09:39 PM
0

I'm sorry but I cannot share your outrage at these compensation packages. For just shy of 7 years I was a management consultant at a firm, with a specialty in nonprofit operations. I worked with variety of nonprofits with mission statements that ran the gamut (environmental, religious, medical,etc.) and the figures presented in your link are market-rate for organizational heads of similar sizes and annual revenue.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 08:24 PM
-2

Wikipedia? Really? That controls for the many caveats you make in your conclusion (i.e., particularly the incumbent status)? I am not trying to be difficult, I just wish that you would "show your work" so to speak.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 08:20 PM
0

What's so magical about coming out of a vagina that bestows personhood? Um. The fact that that it no longer needs to be inside another human being's body and hooked up to another human being's organs. That would be what is so magical about it. It is just that clearcut. Sadly there are a lot of anti-choicers and "both sides are equally vailde-ers" that don't/won't get that.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 08:18 PM
2

Well, you are being rather hostile in your post title, don't you think?
/r/MensRights06/07/12 07:50 PM
0

Disregarding what the laws currently say, at what point do YOU draw the line and would have trouble sleeping after killing a fetus. I don't have to draw a line, nor would I have trouble sleeping. A fetus is not a full human being (rather than potential human being) until it is born. This is why I also oppose fetal homicide legislation. Are the people who draw the line a little bit earlier than you WRONG in still being uncomfortable with it? Yes. That's like asking me, "Are people who think that …
/r/MensRights06/07/12 07:29 PM
0

A fetus =! a born human adult. Your notion of 'innocence' has everything to do with the concept of original sin, whether or not you like it. (I am anti-capital punishment BTW.) Do your research before you try to refute me again.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 07:26 PM
1

Would it be possible for you to edit your post to include links to the data? There's really no way to verify your methodology or conclusion otherwise.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 07:24 PM
6

I was disgusted by the thread as well. Bouncers are meatheads and use execessive force routinely - no way should that be tolerated or expected.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 07:23 PM
1

A large push from the anti-choice faction has centered upon personhood and defining a fetus as an "innocent life." You also do so in indicating that a fetus has "committed no crime," when you know full well that a) it is impossible for a fetus or infant to commit a crime and b) a fetus has no hope of existing outside of another human being's body. This concept of fetal innocence is largely dependent upon the concept of "original sin." The push against abortion is rooted on the notion that a fetu…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:36 PM
1

Ok, my bad. Thanks for clarifying your comment.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 05:32 PM
1

I'm confused. Are you responding directly to me? i.e., you are right-leaning with conservative views on social/economic issues and libertarian views on military policy? Because if that's the case, I don't really know how you don't self-identify as conservative. While it does seem like the majority of MR participants are conservative or right-leaning, it is certainly a big tent, IMO. I am extremely liberal and get the impression that a few others here and in some other sites are as well. There ar…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:58 PM
1

A poster who has absolutely lost his shit that the Affordable Care Act was passed and upheld by the Supreme Court.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:54 PM
14

Congratulations to you and your son. Be sure to let us know how things are going now and again. It sounds like your ex is severely ill and I hope she will eventually get the help she needs.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 03:32 PM
-2

It wouldn't be the first time libertarians were wrong about something. :)
/r/MensRights06/07/12 02:06 PM
1

Ouch, my poor nipples and free time! I think you're very much oversimplifying the demands of pregnancy and motherhood.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:37 PM
0

Why are there always so many links to TwoX and Freminism in here? It seems rather commonplace.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:36 PM
3

I agree, though I do hope it will all be worked out amicably in the long run.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:35 PM
0

This post has nothing to do with MR and has everything to do with you wanting to hate on a woman you think is "karma whoring." This shit doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:34 PM
3

Anthony Zarat (?)
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:32 PM
-1

There are quite a lot of anti-choice, atheist libertarians, however. I feel like this is extremely at odds with bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:32 PM
6

Fat?!?!
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:31 PM
1

IMO the MRM does seem to be quite right-leaning, with conservative views on social and economic issues, and with libertarian views regarding military policy, etc. (especially the MGTOW subset).
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:30 PM
1

Hmm. I recall just yesterday arguing with someone in this subreddit that mounting a campaign to request that Reddit remove abusive subreddits != free speech infringement. That said, I doubt there is anything Reddit can or will do since it does not appear to violate any TOS.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:27 PM
1

This is a great organization. I have several friends who have volunteered during law school for our state's chapter.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:22 PM
1

I've heard that a few times in various places, but I can't say that I really believe it (though I am sure it does happen sometimes). If the MR M doesn't acknowledge the existence of some extremists in its loosely-organized community, it has no place demanding that feminists do the same.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:18 PM
1

If I cannot breathe on my own, no one can force another human being to hook his/her lungs up to mine. If my heart can't beat on its own, no one is forced to give theirs up for mine. There are plenty of atheist anti-choicers out there, AtheistConservative, but I am not one who will ever stand-down to a fundamentally religious mindset, atheist or otherwise. If you have any respect for science or for women, you cannot be anti-choice.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:53 AM
11

I don't have children and don't intend to, but I would definitely encourage my (hypothetical) daughter in things like sports and academics (esp. STEM) and teach her to value herself as a person based on her qualities and not based on what others think of her, how she looks, what she wears, etc. If I had a son, I'd raise him to know that non-traditional creative endeavors (cooking, art, sewing, etc.) are just as interesting and fulfilling as others he might choose, that being a young man doesn't …
/r/MensRights05/07/12 11:11 PM
1

I was thinking the same thing. There was a huge percentage gap in "Legal Services," which I imagine would run the gamut from legal secretaries, clerks, and paralegals to highly paid litigators.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 11:04 PM
1

I'm quite sure I don't need Wikipedia articles to know that Anthony Zarat is a sensationalist and possibly racist conservative half-wit.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:35 PM
0

Hmm...interesting conjecture. I'd say that it doesn't matter what you're attempting to rob (or who you're attempting to rape) - it's the attempting robbery (or rape) that is the crime, not the type of building (or sex of victim.)
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:34 PM
2

Namely that the crime of breaking and entering as well as robbery could still be committed upon a museum as well as a bank.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:24 PM
1

You may be right (as the judge's decision rested on the man raping "this particular woman" who in fact was anatomically male). However, I disagree with the brawls part. The legal system may be very imperfect, but is still a hell of a lot better than the alternative.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:23 PM
1

The victim was a woman, but since she was a transwoman (i.e., anatomically still male) it was taken less seriously. The crime wasn't thrown out, but the attempted rapist had his charges lowered and sentenced to assault. I just wanted to clear those things up.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:22 PM
1

While I think it's a good idea to already be armed when getting into such discussions whether than coming here and asking people to do the legwork for you, this is a good start: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/faq (#3).
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:19 PM
1

Ok, I understand why you might think that. I don't want to get into a competition between who has it worse, because I think it's self-evident that, despite the injustices cis-men face, we generally do not face the level of harassment and violence directed at trans people. However, I do think that in this case, both the victim's trans identity and her being anatomically male (or "not a real woman") came in to play as sexual assault against men is under-reported and not taken seriously by prosecut…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:17 PM
1

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/07/05/511106/sen-rand-paul-compares-scotus-decision-upholding-obamacare-to-pro-slavery-dred-scott-decision/
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:13 PM
2

Well in that case, 2+2 = 5. And how won't you tolerate it? Are you going to delete your Reddit account?
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:12 PM
4

What other determination could be made? Had the victim been a ciswoman rather than a transwoman (i.e., born anatomically male), it would have been a very different outcome. It rests on the notion that the attempted rapist was specifically attacking what he thought to be a woman and that, since the victim was a man*, it wasn't rape. *This is the court's wording, not mine.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:20 PM
0

When you're on the same page as Rand Paul, you're on the wrong fucking page.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:55 PM
49

I think this is about 50/50 with the transphobia and sexism. First the judge (and media, apparently) does not recognize the victim as a woman, then the judge determines that, as a male victim rather than female victim, the attempted rape is of no consequences. Just wrong on several levels.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:42 PM
3

Sorry. Just sounds like a bunch of bullshit GOP talking points coming from this guy.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:04 PM
2

Censorship. That word doesn't mean what you think it means.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:03 PM
-9

You keep telling yourself that, Anthony. Frankly, I think you're full of shit, and the more you dig, the more full of it you are.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:01 PM
-2

You are comparing the Affordable Care Act to what blacks went through with Jim Crow? Do you want people to take any of your criticisms seriously? Because I quit doing so as soon as I read that.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:49 PM
2

Considering your argument has less substance than air, I don't think you're the authority on what is and isn't a good response.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:43 PM
2

Whatever you say, buddy.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:46 PM
2

Um, yes. I'm not saying that all government behavior restrictions are morally wrong (you can't hit people, kill people, etc.) but it is a government restriction.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:45 PM
2

I'm saying that the freedom currently provided by the website is reduced. Well, it took you long enough. I'm sorry, but when someone moderates a site, forum, subreddit, whatever, it is not freedom-reducing to have your shit censored. The site doesn't take your capacity to build or join a new site? I think you're just looking for something to needlessly get up in arms about, TBH. While I think Change.org petitions are an ineffective waste of time, I recognize that people are perfectly within thei…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:11 PM
-2

So should African-American Students' Centers be required to hire whites?
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:20 PM
-3

Well far be it from me to get between a man and his outrage.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:14 PM
1

Cancerous tumors are by your definition alive and human.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:14 PM
3

I have to be honest - I don't think I could touch a urinal cake with my bare hands. Especially if it had pubes on it.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:13 PM
4

How? Are they saying these users/moderators cannot or should not go create their own sites based on their preferred topics? Or are they simply saying they would like a private company to remove the pages devoted to them?
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:12 PM
2

You don't kill a baby for the sake of convenience. You are constructing a straw-woman in regards to late-term pregnancies.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:11 PM
1

So what? Were it not being incubated inside a woman's body, it would have no capacity to beat.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:10 PM
6

So when MR activists organize to contact a diaper company over its offensive and bigoted ads about fathering, is that anti-freedom? I don't think you quite understand what freedom means.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:09 PM
-1

I'm sorry. I've never hugged another man in the nude. NTTAWWT.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:39 AM
2

I'd say it's more because he ruined her career and income potential while married...
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:37 AM
1

Insightful comment, thanks.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:36 AM
-3

Abortion is the ending of a life, and I don't see the difference between killing a 6 month old fetus and a newborn. You probably need to take some biology classes again, then.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:35 AM
2

Do you support the criminalization of abortion, out of curiousity?
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:34 AM
-4

I think abortion can be the most moral decision in a situation. I do not support the idea of financial abortion, however.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:34 AM
2

This post is scattershot and difficult to read. Honestly I don't think trying to belittle feminism with the argument that, "Yeah, but MEN go to war!" is a valid one. Most men don't go to war, you do know.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:33 AM
-2

I think you left out some important context. The article also wrote, "A bailiff, a locksmith and the owner of the property, as well as a prospective tenant, are reported to be among those killed. A woman is believed to be among the victims. According to police, all who were killed died from wounds arising from a gunshot." To me, this is by no means elevating the woman's death above the deaths of other victims, but rather a mere descriptor just like the deads' professions were given.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:32 AM
6

This comment doesn't make sense. It is understandable where users (not just women) may disagree with much of the content hosted at Reddit. How is it anti-freedom for a private person (or group of people) to petition a company to change its practices? This happens in the non-cyber world all the time.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:30 AM
10

Yup. That makes it a whole new level of wrong.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:24 AM
44

Neither is rape.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 07:32 PM
4

NOT. YOUR. BUSINESS.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 07:31 PM
3

If you can't differentiate between a chosen/wanted pregnancy and an unchosen/unwanted pregnancy, there's really nothing I can say to help you. I have escorted before and seen women distraught about their abortions even though the abortion was ultimately wanted. Human nature and emotions are complicated and for you to try to paint your friend as a heartless abortion-loving fiend in one stroke and a grieving mother-to-be in another is really not fair to her, IMO. There are a lot of things in life …
/r/MensRights04/07/12 06:49 PM
3

The fact that you, personally, find it disturbing or icky, should have no effect on any woman's decision. Prevention (condoms, bc pills, other contraception) sometimes fails. Plan B is not necessarily always readily available to women who need it. Abortion is not and should not be a big deal. What bothers me most, however, is this straw-woman you make that has gotten pregnant several times (whatever that means) and had multiple abortions (oh, the horror!) in a year's time. THIS IS NEXT TO IMPOSS…
/r/MensRights04/07/12 06:08 PM
59

The 21-dollar cakes last about three months and were paid for with a federal grant. What a wonderful use of our tax dollars. Something to take a piss all over, that threatens rape if you don't behave the way the government directs you to.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:06 PM
14

I think there are some extremists that are very much anti-women's rights but I don't believe they represent the majority of MRAs.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:03 PM
6

It is literally impossible to get pregnant and have several abortions in a year's time. There is nothing you are saying that isn't just run-of-the-mill "slut-shaming" (yes, it happens). What is more irresponsible? Getting pregnant and birthing a bunch of kids you don't really want and can't afford? Or getting pregnant and getting multiple abortions?
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:02 PM
3

Rape jokes aren't funny, and that one is full of a whole lot of wrong - the notion that the way someone dresses is an invitation to rape, the notion that prison rape is an acceptable consequences of shoplifting, and the whole racism-rooted notion that people wearing sagging pants are criminal.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 02:38 PM
2

Very sad. I briefly went to college in that town in the early 1990s. There were 9 animals in there too.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 02:34 PM
0

Biblical advice is never good advice. Hardly a "white knight," IMO.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 01:56 AM
9

You know, no matter what sort of woman has an abortion, they are all using it "as a form of birth control." If a virgin is raped and gets pregnant, she is still using abortion as a means to end pregnancy and not give birth to a baby. Same thing if it's a woman who has had hundreds of sex partners, many sex partners the same day, etc. I really can't get behind the notion that abortion should be allowed for only women you or someone else deem virtuous. As for your friend having multiple abortions …
/r/MensRights04/07/12 01:54 AM
1

same goes for me, tubs I don't see how this is really helping the discussion or you argument against her post.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:53 PM
6

No offense, but it's not really your place to speak for all women. I am new too, so I probably have no rights saying it, but I feel as though you are somewhat trolling here as you are a redditor for one day.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:52 PM
2

A women?
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:49 PM
1

I read this link to Two X in another thread here. I did not read the comments, but I think it is believable that the married boyfriend had an incentive to lie in his email to the friend. The visiting friend (Anna) also had incentive to lie (as the OP states in the updates.) Either way, I think we can agree it is good that no one was arrested or charged over this.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 02:02 AM
3

I feel like I've seen this before? Are you posting the picture as original content, or simply the comments?
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:58 AM
2

Thank you. Read the post but not the comments. Was I the only one who thought perhaps the "married boyfriend" was lying in his email, to get information from the friend Anna (?) visited? It's not like a married person would have an incentive to lie about something. Whatever really went down, I am glad no one innocent was arrested or jailed, and that no "victim" existed.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:56 AM
6

You're right. That definitely makes sense.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:46 AM
2

Welcome, from one n00b to another.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 11:05 PM
0

LInk?
/r/MensRights02/07/12 11:04 PM
5

I am sure that is frustrating and a huge blow to staff morale all over. Hopefully it is just a matter of time before he screws up royally and is out for good.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:53 PM
35

The "problem" doesn't sound so much attributable to your gender as to your principal's traditionalist mindset. I take it you work in public schools? I am surprised they would hire a principal with such a narrow interpretation of literature and music. Believe it or not, we had a priest with a nose ring when I was in high school. In retrospect, I sort of wonder why he tried so hard.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:22 PM
5

I don't think pain should be a gendered pissing contest (no pun intended). Everyone's experiences in childbirth and in kidney stone passage are different. The only one who could say with any certainty would be a woman who has both given birth and passed kidney stones, but again, since everyone's experiences with pain are different, that wouldn't be reliable.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:55 PM
1

Interesting how that works. My guess it is some sort of biological built-in way to escape long-term inbreeding.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:57 PM
10

I did not see those! Was it the one in the sports bra?
/r/MensRights02/07/12 03:45 PM
1

Thanks. For some reason the video was delaying and getting stuck for me so all I could tell was they were swinging arms around like http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8unO0D5DuqY .
/r/MensRights02/07/12 03:25 PM
-12

Am I missing something? Did they do anything but get in their faces and wave their arms around?
/r/MensRights02/07/12 03:08 PM
1

I have heard good things about it (this has been years ago) but have never read it myself. Amazon.com reviews seem pretty mixed: http://www.amazon.com/Stiffed-The-Betrayal-American-Man/product-reviews/B000H2M9Y6/ref=dp_db_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1 You could always check it out from the library and read a chapter or two - no money lost if you don't like it, and only a little bit of time.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 01:50 PM
0

I wish I had more upvotes to give you. JTO is terrible.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 01:48 PM
6

Why would you post this in 2XC? To be deleted and come here for sympathy is my guess.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 01:48 PM
1

I have had the exact opposite experience in grocery stores. Maybe we just live in different worlds.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 01:46 PM
-18

Why didn't I ever think of that before?
/r/MensRights02/07/12 01:42 PM
2

So, yeah, that was KIND OF MY POINT. Moran.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 08:01 PM
-1

I would love to see him try to take her to court for blackmail. It'd get thrown out in a second. The legal definition of blackmail includes the threat of money or property. I don't think "fuzzy feeling" would hold up in a courtroom.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 06:14 PM
0

It's not blackmail because she did not actually commit the crime of blackmail. Your example is disengenuous, but I have a feeling you already know that. It presupposes that rape and sex are the same act, when they aren't.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 05:12 PM
2

Interesting read - thank you for sharing this. I don't usually read that site.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 03:26 PM
2

Sounds about right. He somewhat famously abused his second wife.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 03:26 PM
5

No one can have it all, really.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 03:23 PM
0

I think it's not blackmail, as the woman was proactively contacted by the man's representatives, whatever that means. It's not like she actively sought him out and said "give me this money or else." Still, the right thing to do would be to decline the money.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 03:22 PM
1

Dear Prudence is a feminist. LOL.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 03:20 PM
2

Um. I didn't make fun of anyone - I was asking for clarification of what "spergy" meant. Those on the autistic spectrum do not have mental illness per se - it's a neurodevelopmental disorder (likely an Axis 3 disorder). Speak to any transgendered person and you will also find they are lobbying hard to have their gender identity removed as a classified mental illness. Making fun of anyone is wrong, IMO.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 03:13 PM
1

You raised the little girl from 7 mos to about 2 years - a little over a year and a half. I don't see how dating someone with a child for 18 months makes that your daughter. That doesn't mean you don't love her and care about her, but she's not yours.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 03:09 PM
-2

Your first mistake was going to any course with the words "biblical principles" in the title.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 10:17 PM
1

Two of my nephews have it and they are both teenagers, I am surprised I haven't heard it before now.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 08:32 PM
-1

Why should they? Do MRAs acknowledge the issues feminists talk about? Wage gap? Reproductive rights? Welfare? Slut-shaming of women? Generally, no. And I don't feel like trolling feminist sites and coming back to report our outrage here is a productive use of time and talents. Nice ad hominem though.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 08:04 PM
4

I had no idea. That's awful.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 03:01 PM
1

Not by the SPLC, evidently.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 02:35 PM
0

This is like asking what /MR does for feminism. Who cares?
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:53 PM
2

This clearly and concisely explains the concept of hypergamy as well, IMO.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:45 PM
4

Is spergy a slur for autistic?
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:29 PM
1

Probably because we don't actually have the fetus growing inside of our bodies and it would therefore be impossible to feel it kick or whatever. We also don't shoot football-to-watermelon sized ones out of our dickholes.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:18 PM
-2

Irony doesn't mean what you think it means.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter