TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GTB3NW Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by GTB3NW on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Yeah I understand why the government does it. It offloads child support from the state to someone else, therefore unburdening the tax payer. Is it right? Not at all
/r/MensRights21/09/20 10:04 AM
-1

I haven't excused her behaviour. You're a joke.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:17 PM
-4

Walking down the street is enough to cause violence. People get mugged just for the fact they're in a certain place. Don't be daft, I've not minced my words so stop trying to extrapolate something out of it that there isn't. If you don't think that someone taunting is enough to wind someone up and for them to resort to violence then I don't think you have the social awareness to even bother having discourse.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:03 PM
3

Yeah that's fair, however considering its fairly split as to if he was taunting then I think it's fair to say it could easily be have interpreted as malicious?
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:00 PM
-7

Stop supporting female on male violence with your bs I mean lacking sympathy isn't supporting female on male violence. Bullshit like that is why people think mensrights is just moany individuals (Sometimes, they'd be right). She shouldn't have done it, but she did. He shouldn't have done it, but he did. Boo fucking hoo for both of them. Hope they throw the book at her but they won't.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 04:43 PM
-5

I don't think he deserved it, I just lack the sympathy after mocking her. I don't think violence is ever the correct answer, but violence happens and the question which caused it was enough to cause it.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 04:38 PM
-28

I don't think they are, there's a difference between lacking surprise or sympathy for someone who gets assaulted for mocking the other person and disagreeing that they assaulted them. I lack sympathy for either of them. He was a dick, she assaulted him. Only difference is one is illegal and as such should be chased up.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 03:47 PM
75

I did not know this, TIL! I thought it was just an arbitrary amount of time which over the years had just constituted a very long time (life). I didn't realise they'd throw you back in for a long time again if you do something illegal.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 08:21 PM
8

After a quick google search I could not find any books authored by the two accusers. Either it's not listed or they penned it under a different name or it's just hearsay.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 10:00 PM
2

I wouldn't go into the hypothetical situations since it just ends up being outrage porn and an appeal to emotion. Don't get yourself worked up about it. It exists, these people are a minority screaming these things and frankly the tide is no longer in their favour, everyone got fed up of their shit.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 11:37 AM
16

It's belief that our current culture is so sexualized it's encouraging rape like behaviour in all men. By rape like behaviour that's including anything a women feels uncomfortable with, including after the fact.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 10:43 AM
1

Ohhh that's not debatable.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 11:51 PM
5

Thing is I'm not outraged, I just know how far to allow free speech and debate before I personally assess that person to be lacking a few required bits to actually allow for debate. FYI: I'm not stopping your free speech by blocking you, I'm just ignoring your moronic comments. Funny how you've still not addressed my first post. Your activism is looking more like autism right now pal.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 04:36 PM
4

Holy shit dude you have no social skills do you? While I commend you activism, I do not commend your reaction. I do not call myself a men's rights activist because of the whiny little fucks like you. Once you start getting like that you invest emotionally rather than for logical reasons. That's what happened to feminism, that's what's happening to men's rights. You are participating in victim culture and outrage porn and the reason you so creepily and laughably looked into my post history was be…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 04:07 PM
4

Upvoting because you're right, they never say they didn't hear about it, just that they weren't contacted. Perhaps they have a policy of sourcing their own information or having trusted outlets of information but do not diverge on it. They said they were going to cover the inquest which is good. OP is just posting outrage porn, they're acting no better than an SJW who's sole purpose is to be outraged.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 08:42 AM
1

The parent post is a logical fallacy. It attacks the argument based on the appearance of the person arguing it.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 09:34 PM
2

None, but if they could I'm sure they'd ban feminist speech. It's not an ideological issue it's a collective issue. I'm sure as men's rights movements progress we will see more and more similarities between the crazies. I'm all for reals before feels mentality and MRA's seem to be more the reals before feels kind of crowd.. however it doesn't mean feels shouldn't have its place. I think for example if you're making a lot of people (more than 50% of the pop) unwell due to a "reals policy" then pe…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:54 PM
9

The TOS apparently say direct harassment. I suppose you could spin it that he was harassing her, but it wasn't exactly sustained on his behalf. Twitter had the gun loaded and Milo knows it, he probably already had the article written.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:55 AM
0

Haha yep! It's why I don't call myself an MRA. I'm for actual gender equality (not gender equity). Mra's and feminists are as bad as each other.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 06:55 AM
-2

You're right, it's posed as an "observation" but it's just cherry picking and is no better than when women say "No women will want you with that attitude" and any other emasculating sentences.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 10:37 PM
6

Does this mean she's not going to be in the Ghostbusters "You go girls" 2?
/r/MensRights18/05/16 10:31 PM
3

For that reason I rarely comment here. Mens rights has about the same introspection as feminism does and while I'd be more likely to side with mens rights in an argument, it isn't the monolith of righteousness people here make it out to be. So I'm going ton upvote you because you have contributed to the conversation, please don't downvote him just because you disagree folks.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 03:20 PM
23

Jezebel being Gawker media who "picture raped"[1] Hulk Hogan. [1] I coin the term entirely in jest.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 03:13 PM
1

No I don't. Hey look over there!
/r/MensRights04/02/16 12:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter