| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rules for thee but not for meI don't know what to tell you. You'll get smelly, maybe, which is socially frowned upon, I guess? If you can go weeks and not catch an infection move along, you probably have a healthy immune system; it's generally agreed that cleaning your genitals can lower your risk of infections (often UTIs) because it moves the bacteria in our bodies around, bonus if you kill them with soap, but people who shower every day catch infections too so what gives, right? To be clear I don't agree with circumcisio… | /r/MensRights | 07/09/18 03:52 AM |
| 1 | Rules for thee but not for meInteresting, have no kids and not sure if I even want them, but good to know. | /r/MensRights | 07/09/18 03:37 AM |
| 1 | Rules for thee but not for meWell, I lived in El Salvador, where circumcision is not customary, it's barely even mentioned, and from what I've heard of other guys it's even avoided—so of course doctors will consider it very last resort when all else has failed. I agree with someone else who said we don't go cutting lady bits when there's persistent infection, so why would we do that to men. | /r/MensRights | 07/09/18 12:01 AM |
| 1 | Rules for thee but not for meI'm a bit late but yeah, I agree with you. Apparently it reads the wrong way? I'm not a dr. so I can't really say if it really works in regards to avoiding/getting rid of infections, personally I very much doubt it or it could have a very slim effectiveness rate if at all. The whole "keeps it clean/avoids infection" myth is just that: a myth, and it's so prevalent in America. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/18 11:56 PM |
| 1 | Rules for thee but not for meLet me ask: why would it have to be completely banned? Why not just make it a law to delay circumcision and make it optional once you become an adult (18 or even 21?) that way everybody gets their cake and eats it too. To be clear: I *detest* the idea of genital mutilation both in men and in women; it's barbaric whether done religiously or not, but if we're about finding a middle ground that benefits all (especially the child who doesn't get to decide), then I think that would be it, no? | /r/MensRights | 04/09/18 04:51 AM |
| 6 | Rules for thee but not for meThat fine line can be easily fixed: let *them* choose to be circumcised when they're over 18! | /r/MensRights | 04/09/18 04:46 AM |
| 11 | Rules for thee but not for meEven for sanitary reasons, it's often unnecessary. Take a shower daily (or at the very least every other day), change your underwear, go to the doctor if it looks like you have a UTI (rare but possible in men) or STI and most likely you'll be fine. I won't go into details but I only know one guy who was recommended it by drs when his candida infection wouldn't go away with anything; even then, drs were willing to try anything before circumcision because it was last resort. Lucky for the guy, his… | /r/MensRights | 04/09/18 04:46 AM |
| 19 | Rules for thee but not for meVery much this. Also, this is something very American; at least in LatAm, from my experience, people don't circumcise their kids (unless they're Jewish and do it for religious/traditional reasons). The issue is an American one, and both parents often have a say in it, not just women imposing anything—you guys have been sold the idea that "it's cleaner", but as long as you take a shower and change your underwear you'll most likely be fine. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/18 04:41 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter