TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Gabsboy123 Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by Gabsboy123 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Did you realize that the other guy would be deterred away from doing that because he'd be risking a scenario where it's just him alone vs the whole group?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 06:04 AM
2

There's this saying "don't hate the player, hate the game" These people wouldn't have gotten so far without modern Western society already conditioning men that their worth (both as an individual and as a man) is tied to how many women they can bring to bed. And women in turn use sexual access as a reward for men's behavior. The problem is that feminists and blue pill people refuse to drag the sort of women that go after the men who exhibit this ethos, because doing so would be considered "slut …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 06:59 AM
2

Can you demonstrate how the repeal of Roe v Wade directly led to the male loneliness crisis in the West?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 10:33 AM
2

80% of these women's problems will be solved if (1) they start doing the approaching, and (2) go for men with good character but who are otherwise not attractive or charismatic. But what we're seeing here is that men still have to do the approaching to women in this day and age. And because a lot of men are socially awkward, have high inhibition, are afraid of rejection or have self-esteem issues, this social norm ends up still rewarding the confident and talkative ones, regardless of their mora…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 10:29 AM
-1

You don't realize that inter-male competition is a thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 05:52 AM
3

So it's just direct slut-shaming by men vs proxy slut-shaming by women
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 05:50 AM
1

Except which of these two groups are morally correct? Men cannot just step in and weigh their thoughts on the matter because feminism would invalidate our judgment as "mansplaining." One side can appeal to female empowerment while the other can invoke the patriarchy as the source of exploitation of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 12:15 AM
2

Same with whenever some guy brings up how women use sex to reward male behavior. It's not an ethical endorsement to round up women as breeding mares, just a factual observation about female nature. There's a lot of is-ought fallacy committed by both sides when interpreting manosphere ideas. One can acknowledge that there are shallow women, loose women, etc.—and then conclude to not want to date them. One can point out that women are also capable of hurting and abusing without advocating for thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 12:09 AM
1

Given that neither of those presumptions hold, and that men are generally the sexual pursuers, the most probable conclusion is that men who are very successful with women are the most likely to know what women want. As a corollary, the sort of men whom women reward with sex are the ones whose behavior are effectively approved by women and society in general, regardless of how much women moralize about misogyny, sexism, patriarchy, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 11:20 AM
2

You could hardly find any logic over that, when the "Booktok" community heavily leans progressive yet the sort of romance novels that get popular these days are the ones that glorify ab*se and domination over women. Takeaway: being a misogynist or right-winger is okay if you're a famous athlete—or you're a vampire/werewolf/furry protagonist in some smut novel
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 11:06 AM
1

There's a longstanding fallacy I've observed from feminists that all men—and by that I mean all men regardless of class, occupation, nationality or race—are supposedly working with each other together to oppress women collectively through the patriarchy (which feminists haven't even demonstrated whether it's a societal construct or something embedded in every male's nature). It's not contradictory to say that women need men for protection while at the same time pointing out examples of men in po…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 09:18 AM
4

Except that this doesn't automatically follow that men who embody the 2nd set of traits are inferior or less masculine than those who embody the 1st, or that these two sets of traits are mutually exclusive. I'm saying this in the context of red pill leaning dudes always complaining about AF/BB. An ugly man who is out of shape but otherwise has power, status and money would still have access to casual sex with the women who are supposedly acting in "Chad seeking" mode. And most men with this desc…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 09:05 AM
1

tbf disregarding the whole ideological context of feminism, there's nothing wrong with what you're describing. A man can be both, the key here is being virtuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 05:18 AM

Something like this should have been relevant pre-Covid, at the latest around 2022-23
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 05:22 AM
2

Something something "comparison is the thief of joy"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:38 AM
0

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 10:21 AM

The only loins I know are roast beef tenderloins 😋
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 03:26 PM
1

Who says the "male friend" has to be single or even straight for that matter? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:19 AM
2

For real man a couple of weeks in this sub and the lack of empathy coming from people of various ideologies just makes me sad
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:18 AM
3

If she’s sulky or bitchy for whatever reason, just buy her shit. Take her shopping, buy her food, buy her new clothes. There done. That random small comment you made that triggered her female hormones is now basically erased from history. Or how about don't date these shallow narcissistic materialistic types in the first place? Men gotta stop lusting after these high maintenance bitches just as you'd want women to stop chasing the "chad" assjoles who'd just pump and dump them
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 02:45 AM

You're lucky she didn't blame you instead. Immigration trauma + emotionally immature ahh moment
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 02:39 PM
1

I also identify as purple for similar reasons. One can point out female nature, as uncomfortable as it is to many women on the Internet, while still acknowledging women's rights to go to school, vote, work, etc. In fact I would say that it's morally consistent: you can't ask women to be held accountable if you don't believe that they're capable of agency, free will and reason. Red-pill advice over-corrects from there, though, to misogyny; narrow, traditional gender roles; and reactionary politic…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 11:20 AM
5

The two other replies not getting your analogy 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 10:44 AM
3

One can't even make a good faith discussion in this subreddit without getting snarky or cranky replies. No matter that my viewpoints take the "middle path" by identifying as purple pill
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 10:19 AM

And it's wrong to express negative emotions because?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 09:01 AM

Read my comment again, never said it's the best for me, rather that it takes the best aspects of feminism and conservatism (which everyone thinks are fundamentally opposed to each other). It's perfectly consistent to advocate for women to be able to work, get [highly] educated, hold office, etc., basically give them opportunities to showcase their abilities—but at the same time disapprove of porn and sex work as an institution. The common ground being that women shouldn't be valued solely for th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 08:47 AM

This actually takes the best of both 2nd wave feminism and American social conservatism, the only "penalty" being time (going through a formal courtship process) as well as accepting that a prospective wife wouldn't be a housewife/trad wife, which tbf won't be a concern if you aren't insecure or egotistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 08:21 AM
2

There's a sociological term for this practice (forgot what it's called) of capitalizing upon the competition's blind-sided bias and taking the opportunity to reap resources that rivals have otherwise turned down. But it's not pick-me behavior by definition because you're not signalling yourself that you're necessarily better than others. So in the case of getting women, if many other men choose to forgo or reject an otherwise hot woman because of her n count, then it just means less competition …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 10:08 AM
2

Beyblade with a launcher and grip right on my bed when 8-year-old me woke up on Christmas morning.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 03:14 PM
1

Go to the virgin and ForeverAloneWomen subs, there's plenty of that demographic there
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 06:29 AM
3

If human biology makes it possible to have children past the age of 50 (and without any complications to put) there might be fewer people going childfree or anti-natalist. Like there's still so much a person can accomplish in their 30s and 40s but modern society is putting a pressure for everyone to fulfill a timeline of having a family when you hit the age of 35
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 04:46 AM
1

I personally consider watching true crime a red flag when choosing a woman, I can't imagine trying to get a dopamine hit from watching documentaries about the most messed up incidents happening out there. I can't even bear watching a lot of fictional TV shows with so much graphic stuff. I would remember being so disturbed whenever I overhear my mother watching violent stuff on Netflix. It made me realize that women aren't automatically more capable of empathy or sensitive to other people's well-…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 02:51 AM
1

The toxicity of places like TwoX is a thing in the first place because normal women don't ever discipline them, and if they do the women at TwoX will just play the internalized misogyny card.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 03:23 AM

Your dad would have done the same had your mom been around too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 12:47 PM
5

Should be "N Counts Bi-weekly Discussion Thread"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 12:10 PM
1

Did you get the point, all the propaganda on both sides turning people against each other are ultimately imposed from above.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 03:07 AM
1

We don't even have to use someone as extreme as Bonnie for example. Lots of femcels all over the Internet are already losing it at Sabrina and Sydney, accusing them of "setting feminism 50 years back" for what, just capitalizing on their looks and bodily autonomy and benefiting from the outcomes of the "sexual revolution?" <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 04:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter