TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Gadaeus1 Archive

View 0 posts and 68 comments by Gadaeus1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Lmao, I'd so park there. I'd love to win that lawsuit.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 02:17 PM
2

I'm sorry and I agree its frustrating. People absolutely weaponize such language and that sucks. The fact is though that its literally both. Men both have that privilege while not having the privilege of the other. Different privileges affect different people disproportionately. One does not necessarily have to reap the benefits of a privilege they have. Privilege just is. People using that information to push misandry are simply wrong. Bad actors abusing concepts means such people are simply as…
/r/MensRights13/07/19 08:39 PM
2

something that is given to you that you have not earned. The times I encounter it characterized that way are mostly from opponents of the word's usage in perceiving it as a personal attack because such people feel it undermines their own accomplishments. The big theme with people talking about privilege is one of understanding struggles unique to other groups of people. It's not about accusing others of being unfair. Im probably going to be crucified for posting this here but here it goes. https…
/r/MensRights13/07/19 08:19 PM
-4

Its both. Its a privilege to have that biology. A privilege women do not share. The words privilege and biology are not mutually exclusive or contradictory. privilege noun: privilege; plural noun: privileges a special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group. An example of female privilege would be that they have an easier time finding dates. Another would be that they get to choose whether or not to terminate a pregnancy they are involved in.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:52 PM
-5

Men don't menstruate for one. Men also have more innate strength.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:24 PM
-2

While I agree with the point you are making, male privilege is a thing. Its just that female privilege is also a thing. Most groups have some privilege over others. For example. Straight people have the privilege of a bigger selection of partners. Gay people have the privilege of not having to worry about birth control.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:11 PM
2

Calm yes. Rational no.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:23 AM
2

Why do I have the feeling you're hypothetical person isn't some detached thought experiment?
/r/MensRights09/07/19 04:47 PM
93

My men's rights solution to this isn't the bitch at women to wear more, but to change the standards for men. Its ridiculous how ridged, conservative and bland our standards are when compared to women. Men should have the right to dress in a way that is more comfortable to them in a work environment just like women do. I fucking hate tucking my ugly ass work shirt into my ugly ass khakis.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 03:40 AM
2

That is someone's opinion on how the law should be changed. That would be quite horrible. How can they gender it like that? What if lesbians have sex while drunk? Would that just be dividing by zero and cause this bitches head to explode?
/r/MensRights08/07/19 10:03 PM
3

Women can't consent to sex when under the influence. Doesn't that only apply when the rapist specifically uses alcohol as a drug with that intent? In that way they are charged as if they drugged them similarly to using roofies etc. That was the way I understood it anyway. Has there been any cases where that isn't true?
/r/MensRights08/07/19 03:25 PM
-36

Im fairly certain that isn't true.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 04:41 PM
-42

It isn't illegal to have sex while drunk. What are you referencing?
/r/MensRights05/07/19 04:32 PM
20

How would that matter in a legal setting? I thought legally speaking minors cannot provide consent even if they do.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 04:28 PM
14

Im not against the idea but be aware that it would create a loophole. People could just tell underaged teens to meet at such a place as a loophole to avoid stat rape charges. That would likely be the primary argument against this.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 04:26 PM
0

I know WHAT you are saying dudebro. What I don't get is the WHY. Its hard not to project toxicity onto commentary like that when I don't see any alternative.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 09:07 PM
0

I'm not strawmaning you. I'm simply failing to understand your point of view. I re-read the whole line of discussion before posting my previous post. I don't understand how one can think that way. I don't understand your point of view. Why are you valuing women by the potential for sex? We're talking about the value men and women provide to men. Why?
/r/MensRights01/07/19 08:53 PM
-6

I don't even understand how that is a thing... Why is that discussion being held? What kind of person looks at something through a lens like that other than specifically trying to justify some form of sexism? I don't think I understand the basis of this conversation at all... This keeps happening here in this sub. Its like I'm speaking an entirely different language and using different rules of logic than people here. Are you trying to say men aren't worth as much from the position of being a ma…
/r/MensRights01/07/19 07:42 PM
-6

Umm... to women? Hello?
/r/MensRights01/07/19 05:35 PM
1

I may have been tempted into vandalism over that one.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 02:34 PM
4

He does that with men too though. This is just him having a higher than average respect for personal space.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 02:31 PM
-3

I'm sorry what? Are you unironically saying men can't provide sex?
/r/MensRights01/07/19 02:27 PM
4

I personally find that even worse. I have the same issue with terms such as "actor/actress". Fortunately, we are starting to see actresses starting to adopt the term "actor" instead. The same job shouldn't have a different title just because of gender.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 04:00 AM
3

doh... there we go then lol
/r/MensRights01/07/19 03:58 AM
9

fireperson. Oh god... are people really pushing for that term? I'm all for more gender neutral language, but fireperson sounds silly as hell. How about just renaming the job title to "Extinguisher", ":Fire officer" or something?
/r/MensRights01/07/19 01:48 AM
1

Props. I don't flat out agree with what you said, but its a pretty good take. I think it certainly adds a valid perspective to the conversation, and I don't doubt that a lot of people are motivated in this way. That said, I don't feel you've invalided my current view rather than added to it. Where I clash on your view is that I think you weigh it too strongly whereas I just think its A factor rather than THE factor. Women can provide more value in just existing, but they often do far more than t…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 02:51 PM
1

the theory that our entire civilization and culture has been created by men and largely for their own interests- is extremely unrealistic. I don't agree with that interpretation of patriarchy. Patriarchy means that males statically hold more authority. That's it. I think the world absolutely was centered around men a good 100 years ago and still is in some middle eastern countries and China to a good degree. If we are talking Western culture though I think its much more subtle. The world isn't c…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 02:34 PM
1

Well... I'm not going to say either of those are invalid because they are certainly problems. I don't think "most" or "key reasons" is fair. Misandry and female-centric thinking come about because of toxic masculinity largely which is why I used the term "key reason" there. There are also angles that don't really quite fit those 2 and those are the ones that have affected me the most personally. That is why I'm here in the first place. I'm not going to get in the way of opposing "female-centric …
/r/MensRights18/06/19 09:54 PM
1

I concur with that. Do you thing that is wrong?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 08:28 PM
1

The response to that is not to become a bigoted misogynistic hate monster. Keep fighting. Keep explaining. Fight for your rights. Okay... I just now looked into Philip Davies now. I can see why he is criticized. He very much appears to be a bigoted misogynistic hate monster. His platform for men's rights appears to me to be a thin veil for his anti-feminism. I don't believe for a second that a man like him is arguing in good faith when talks about men's rights. To me, he appears to be using the …
/r/MensRights18/06/19 08:01 PM
1

No they aren't. Those are terms used to describe something. Assuming you don't actively perpetuate such things I'm sorry that you have a misunderstanding of them or have experienced encounters with abuse of them have caused you to feel personally attacked by them.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:31 PM
1

Bro. Different words can overlap in meanings. This is English. We have a lot of words that mean a lot of different and same things. The presence of overlap doesn't invalidate phrases or words with subtle differences. Internalized misandry has a good bit of overlap with toxic masculinity, but they aren't 1 for 1.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:09 PM
1

They are, we do, and they call us misogynists for it. Keep fighting then. When they feminism began they were derided as well. Feminism isn't the problem just because you can find feminists that are toxic or misandrist. The problem is they are being misandrists, and we need to fight our own battle without undermining theirs. I talk to people about this stuff all the time. Explain why what they are saying is problematic. Show them the issues and keep explaining. But we aren't talking about here. W…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:04 PM
1

I agree that's part of it, but feminists also include any gender standards that harm women under the definition of "misogyny". Well those people are wrong and need to be corrected. This is the place where a term such as "toxic femininity" would be expected to popularize. If not here then where?! They aren't going to do it for us. We need to add to the discussion to make it more accurate and complete, and stop tearing it down because we've failed to include ourselves in it.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:44 PM
1

So start it?! This is EXACTLY the type of environment where one would expect such a term to popularize. If not here first then where!?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:40 PM
1

Exactly... unfortunately most people here seem to thing it means "masculinity is bad" and take it as a personal attack.... Fucking hell... We have a long way to go.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:39 PM
1

Are you implying that toxic masculinity is something that only males have the ability to perpetuate?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:37 PM
1

You are projecting those inferences with those words. I strongly disagree with the connection you made. Toxic masculinity is not the male version of misogyny. Toxic masculinity is not the same thing as misandry. You mis-defined misogyny to push a false narrative. Misogyny is the act of hating women and doing targeted harm towards women. Toxic masculinity is... well literally exactly what you said. If only more people here would understand that is what toxic masculinity actually meant and stopped…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:33 PM
1

Really? I've never heard of that. If that is the case that seems like a pretty clear cut case of misandry.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 05:46 PM
1

I didn't call you mad...
/r/MensRights14/06/19 11:21 PM
1

I asked you about the contradictions you refereed to and you just said something completely irrelevant and meaningless even if it was. REEEE harder.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 11:16 PM
1

That statement doesn't mean anything.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 11:12 PM
1

Such as?
/r/MensRights14/06/19 09:43 PM
1

Fuck off with your thinly veiled transphobia stupid chud. This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 09:31 PM
1

Never might be a strong word. The concept of the family as it stands has not been around forever and certainly will not be around forever. It won't be an eternity before technology is better at parenting than humans and the concept of the family as we know it dissolves.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 09:00 PM
1

I'm going to disagree with you quite emphatically. A tiny minority of men having authority (in the case of our culture in particular, one that rules at the behest of a majority-female voter pool), doesn't make our culture a patriarchy. No it doesn't, but the fact that we are a patriarchy is the reason why this is the case. You got it backwards. All men don't need to be completely in control for it to be a patriarchy. You're acting like the world has to be super extra mega patriarchal for it to b…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:23 PM
1

Should a woman have the right to a paper abortion, unilaterally foisting the entire financial responsibility onto the father if he wanted the child? Yes, I believe that. I can't see a single reason why that should not be the case. but I don’t believe it would be beneficial to society to allow a parent to unilaterally sever their responsibility, in either direction. Women already have that right, and I don't see that being taken away. I don't even know how that would be enforceable. Even if you a…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 06:33 PM
1

Would women also have this right? I'm just going to quickly end your concerns by answering this with a yes. You're concerns go away if you simply answer that question with a yes. Women most certainly should be able to do this. In that case, should the father make the same choice, the child would be put up for adoption. If not, the father gets custody. it’s completely unworkable. You know relinquishing custody already exists as a female right don't you? Not all adoptions are orphans. Women can fo…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 06:23 PM
1

If we lived in a patriarchy society where men's needs were put first That isn't what patriarchy means. A patriarchy is simply a culture where men are more often in positions of authority. I believe the fact that most of our cultures ARE patriarchal is why our rights are over looked. Those who have implied authority have higher standards placed upon them. Furthermore, there are those who feel that this one area of privilege that males have means they don't need support in other areas because they…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 04:58 PM
1

https://sindeloke.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/37/ I've seen this used to explain this sort of thing a few times before. Basically, these women have the privilege of not being in the position such men are subjected to. They don't have the tools to even comprehend why such a dynamic is hurtful to those men, so they disregard such issues as not real because they don't have the capacity to experience them. They attempt to judge men in this position by the same metric they would judge other women by in …
/r/MensRights14/06/19 04:46 PM
1

Despite my disagreement with much of the anti-feminist narrative in this subreddit. This shit is absolutely abominable and I'm absolutely dumbstruck that people are okay with this obscene double standard. That said, I don't think the solution lies in giving men the right to veto a pregnancy. There is no ethical way to do that. I think the solution is in opting out. If one opts out, they are under no obligation to support the child. Additionally, they forfeit any parental rights.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 03:56 PM
1

I feel like you didn't even read what I said and just repeated the same thing. I'm saying women are more often than not NOT EXAGERATED. Stop using the exception to compare to the overwhelming majority of the opposition. Exaggerated in art - Men:90% Women:10% Realistic in art - Men:10% Women:90%
/r/MensRights12/06/19 03:22 PM
1

Anti-feminism and misogyny are literally synonyms.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 03:00 PM
1

Basis on the above, and since we accepted that neither is reasonable or reasonably well-liked, why is we condemn the female un-realism but not the male un-realism? I"m not doing that. I'm criticizing the contrast of realism in women to unrealism in men in cartoons. Women are drawn more realistically because sexualization is priority number 1. Men are drawn more caricatured and exaggerated. I think both sexes lose here, and this is part of the reason I'm interested in men's rights. I think its se…
/r/MensRights12/06/19 01:38 PM
1

In my experience nobody can hate a woman as much as another woman. Holy shit.... They don't hate them BECAUSE they are women... lord.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 03:17 AM
1

Says the misogynist...
/r/MensRights12/06/19 02:47 AM
1

Good lord... Fucking lost causes all around. So entrenched in your stupid neckbeard fantasies that reality is lost on you.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 02:29 AM
1

but thats not the case with most. I mean... You're not right... You can say stupid shit a thousand times more, but it doens't make it anymore true. A good example is Chris Hemsworth in the Thor movies, he always goes shirtless/almost nude at least once in each movie. First off... he doesn't look even remotely close to the given example... Not even almost. Attractive women in these do look real. Chris Hemsworth doesn't look like fucking Broly, or any other pertinent character to this conversation…
/r/MensRights12/06/19 01:49 AM
1

Its obvious that misandrists are going to be female for the most part.... That really doesn't mean anything. Most misogynists are male! Its almost as if that's just how that would obviously work! Shocker!!! The critical thinking skills are astounding. That is like saying being white and being a white supremacist go together like peaches and cream.... its true but it doesn't mean anything ....dumbass....
/r/MensRights12/06/19 01:39 AM
1

That isn't an ideal man lmao. That is what retarded neckbeards think the ideal man is. No one wants that.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 01:26 AM
1

Holy shit! That is fucking disgusting. Shit like this is why I support capital punishment. There is no reason these women shouldn't be swiftly erased. Edit: What the hell does this have to do with feminism? This is extreme misandry. Keep your fucking misogyny or you are no different than them.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 09:46 PM
1

No. That's just male power fantasy perpetuated by neckbeards.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 05:43 PM
1

How out of touch with reality can you fucking be!?
/r/MensRights11/06/19 05:42 PM
-2

Did you come up with that one on your own?! How clever! /s I've heard and countered this bit so many times I don't even bother to put my heart into it anymore. I get along with people I disagree with all the time. You and everyone else who says this repugnant line are fools for reducing it to that. It is the contents of one's beliefs that make evil. Civil disagreement was the norm for me pre Trump. The claim reduces this to "can't handle disagreement" is a stupid as reducing my intolerance of ca…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/18 04:05 PM
-2

That's certainly the way you're going to choose to look at it.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/18 07:17 AM
-31

You used the capital in both cases, implying I'm a member of the party, Nah. Reddit auto capitalizes it. The party is long dead. Which is why it is a generic insult thrown at idiots that share mindsets of a similar strain of evil. Lol! You're trying so hard to sound composed and its so transparent. Such a common tactic of those of your ilk. You think that if you act detached and "analytical" it makes you above a low effort insult. The giveaway is how tryhard it looks. Afterall… if you put more e…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/18 04:31 AM
-39

Feminists caused this. They reap what they sow. You're totally a Nazi lmao
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/18 04:10 AM
-49

What the hell does this have to do with feminism? Jesus Christ you Nazis are retarded.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/18 03:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter