TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GaffnyMcGuckin Archive

View 17 posts and 224 comments by GaffnyMcGuckin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
222

Men's RightsGaffnyMcGuckin/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 07:01 PM
83

False AccusationGaffnyMcGuckin/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:17 PM
68

GaffnyMcGuckin/r/MensRights07/10/16 02:47 AM
54

False AccusationGaffnyMcGuckin/r/MensRights02/01/17 12:04 PM
28

False AccusationGaffnyMcGuckin/r/MensRights29/07/17 08:45 PM
26

False AccusationGaffnyMcGuckin/r/MensRights02/12/16 04:48 AM
18

GaffnyMcGuckin/r/MGTOW06/10/16 09:12 PM
15

GaffnyMcGuckin/r/MGTOW10/10/16 03:37 PM
14

GaffnyMcGuckin/r/MGTOW20/10/16 12:52 AM
11

False AccusationGaffnyMcGuckin/r/MensRights29/07/17 08:09 PM
9

GaffnyMcGuckin/r/MensRights19/10/16 08:18 PM
5

GaffnyMcGuckin/r/MensRights06/11/16 02:09 PM
2

GaffnyMcGuckin/r/MensRights10/10/16 03:27 PM
2

GaffnyMcGuckin/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 04:41 PM
1

CMVGaffnyMcGuckin/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 05:27 PM
0

GaffnyMcGuckin/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 06:47 PM
0

GaffnyMcGuckin/r/MensRights03/09/17 07:20 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Actually there are hundreds, if not thousands, of these types of studies: following the course of sexual assault and rape complaints to law enforcement through the criminal justice process, and now even meta studies of groups of these studies. Some, through the police reaction to a report (up to arrest), others all the through adjudication of complaints. All of the studies, no matter the country in which it is performed, show the same results: none show that a significant amount of reports garne…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 12:17 PM
1

click on my username "gaffnymcguckin" and go to my posts. There is a lot of information with links.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:28 PM
2

"America's top sex crime expert", Linda Fairstein, was quoted by Ben Stein as saying ~ half of 4000 reports in Manhattan every year "simply didn't happen" See https://imgur.com/a/MQjlg Problem is that is a limited hangout as I am sure Ms. Fairstein convictions in terms of reports never reached double digits. RAINN states on their website that convictions, in the U.S., is equal to 2.25% of reports. Further I never noticed that the number of Uniform Crime Reports for all five of NYC boroughs ever …
/r/MensRights05/10/17 01:55 AM
2

It's simple, of all rapes reported to police, and then recorded by police (including no-crimes) the percent that achieve a conviction is around 5 to 6%. It should be noted that in the UK, police didn't always record all reports, leaving unrecorded the more obvious ridiculous ones. Of all recorded reports, the ones that get into the purview of the CPS (around 10% to 20%) and not dropped before reaching some judicial conclusion is the 57.9% conviction rate that is quoted by the CPS. Say 100% recor…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 08:40 AM
1

go to a former post I made regarding this subject: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/58cjkm/white_women_crying_rape_often_accuse_black_guys/ It contains links to three studies which verify this is a true phenomenon. It also contains links to another post I made regarding the opinions of "America's top sex crime expert". Go see some of my other post regarding the subject of "Rape Culture" Bottom line: The conviction rate in terms of reports all across the West is very low. To believe t…
/r/MensRights16/09/17 12:39 AM
1

Ok cacheflow. See that theothermod they are already dancing to your cowardly capitualtion. From now on might I suggest you find a backbone and not let other people dictate how to live your life.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 01:22 AM
1

That's why reddit is going to shit. So much for the free expression of opinions. I am going to print it out though and include it in my book. It is illuminative and edifying on many points. Not the least being how reddit is probably, like many other websites only fit for seeing cute things and thinking happy thoughts. It seems any real controversial debate here is circumvented by arbitrary rules. I know I'll think long and hard about ever contributing to this site. It seems a waste of time. I be…
/r/MensRights04/09/17 01:14 AM
0

Let me be clear then. I don't believe the feminist assertion that all law enforcement administrations across Western civilization blithely let around 90% of rape suspects off the hook because they could care less about rape victims. Remember since the early 2000 women have been consciously been employed as investigators of these crimes, and the rape crisis system of complainant advocacy gathered impetus in the early 1990's in the US with the original passage of VAWA. Yet the conviction rate has …
/r/MensRights04/09/17 01:05 AM
0

No no. As a start perhaps you should just answer the original question. Do I need to restate it for you like I had to do for other intransigent responders. For the tenth time! The % of criminal convictions for rape in terms of reports is in the low single digits. Rape culture advocates assert that this extant conviction rate, absolutely consistent over all places and in terms of time as far as the eye can see, is reflective of Western civilization lack of concern for rape victims. Are the rape c…
/r/MensRights04/09/17 12:32 AM
2

Yes but what of the seminal question that began this whole thread? I had to restate it a number of times for another poster that either, like you, didn't readily comprehend it, or didn't answer it for other reasons about which I can only speculate. I'll put it in very simple language for especially for your benefit, as I did for the other commenter. The % of convictions for rape reports recorded across Western civilization is in the low single digits. Rape culture advocates say that these result…
/r/MensRights04/09/17 12:19 AM
1

That was my first time posting on 'change my view", and I didn't really read the rules other then thinking it was a place to debate. Regardless of my supposed violations many people put some amount of work into responding to my query. I think it was bush-league to capaciously just delete all that work. If I was one of those responders I would be a bit peeved.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:59 PM
1

yea yea but I've asked you several times and yet you fail to respond to the question. Why? Let me restate the question: Convictions for rape in terms of reports are in the single digits everywhere across Western civilization. In response to these results rape culture advocates claim a dearth of concern within Western civilization towards the crime of rape, and justice for women. Do you believe these assertions by rape culture advocates? Until you answer that question, I must say put very credenc…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:54 PM
2

Yes but that is obviously an imaginary world. So what's your estimate of the accuracy of every last law enforcement administration across Western civilization. The percent of convictions for rape, as mentioned, is in the low single digits. what is the estimate of their error. 10%? 20%? 50%? According to feminist, interpolating their assertions against actual results they are right at best only 10% of the time and flat wrong 90% of the time. Is that how you figure it too?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:39 PM

Ok, but let's imagine your dear old dad in light of the fact that rape convictions in terms of report are minimal. Do you think your father might give you the same advice? After all, feminist say that rape laws, in light of conviction rates provide little deterrence to rape and as a result it is rampant. Would you say the same thing to your father if he advised you to avoid situations where rape is more possible. I can picture you now. Your father gives you that advice and you respond "oh go fuc…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:31 PM
2

Yea but what about the feminist rape culture conspiracy complete with lack of any sufficient remedial actions by Western civilization. The idea that started this whole conflagration. What are you opinions on that posited conspiracy?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:15 PM
2

Don't worry about the brigaders, I welcome them. Let them say what's on their mind. As of yet, the best answer is that rape in a criminal court is hard to prove. Just for the sake of the debate, I'll concede that point. What are the implications of that contention. I can tell you what I think they mean by that. They are saying that men are sociopathic and based upon the odds, they are figuring even if they rape someone there is only a small chance of serious ramifications, so rape is rife. In fa…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:11 PM

In the debate of ideas there are only good arguments and bad arguments, nothing else should matter. Where did i make a bad argument? An answer for that question please before any irrelevant asides.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:01 PM
1

I sorry but I can often burgeon on incivility with people that are asserting the incivility of a whole class of humans like feminist are in the business of doing. Like the slavers and pogrom promulgators of the past, feminist exist to assert the incivility of men. That is their profession in a nutshell. Against such claims, while I try to speak reasonably, even small slights can escalate. But be assured that it was the feminist that made the first scurrilous accusation and they don't take it wel…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:57 PM

Actually any subreddit titled "change my view" is provoking a debate. I don't come to my views lightly. Nor am I so irresponsible to even express a view that I haven't well considered. Nonetheless, I came to a conclusion and was genuinely looking for counter-arguments to mt theory. The best I've gotten was that the explanation for the absolutely skewed one sided results is that rape, despite everything, is hard to prove in a Western criminal court. Let's presume, in the end, thatt is the absolut…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:47 PM

Ok Ok take it easy. You know you can't deny that convictions in term or recorded reports everywhere across the West, and for at least the last decade and a half have been in the low single digits. It is also of no doubt that the feminist response to this exigency has been to assert that, everywhere in the West, that they have noted that the situation hasn't changed. Actually aligning with feminist contentions that the situation is drastic and dire Western governments have taken steps to comply w…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:30 PM
2

See below, I don't totally disregard this point, on the other hand does it explain the entirety of the situation. Keep in mind, again that of all known recorded rape complaints (recorded is different from reported which is a larger number, but a whole different story) the % of convictions is in the low single digits. 3% in Scotland and Australia, around 6% in the rest of the UK, and though the information is sparse in the US, I have it pegged at >5%. Their are other indicators that the actual si…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 09:43 PM

Perhaps the crime of rape in unprovable in many cases and that explains why conviction rates are so low. That's a theory, but then what? That exigency has been true forever. If the crime is so horrendous but undeterrable because it is hard to prove in a court of law, perhaps women should take this into account and avoid situations where it is possible. Apparently they are doing the opposite as in the UK reports have increased 800% in the last couple of decades while convictions haven't even doub…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 09:16 PM

Conspiracy theories??? The whole feminist establishment claims the reason that rape convictions are in the single digits is because there is a giant patriarchal conspiracy against women!!! Does that make sense at all? Across jurisdictions, countries and all the personalities who investigate these crimes, there is, according to feminist, a giant conspiracy -- group think. That's the feminist story and they say it because what else can they say. Feminist will say anything with a straight-face, or …
/r/MensRights03/09/17 09:01 PM

Go read the post. there is information included in them. Convictions in terms of reports in every western country is in the low single digits. Do you deny that? You can't because it is true. Go read my other submittals they contain a bounty of material. For instance did you know that when white women cry rape, >40% of the time they claim the suspect was a black man. Do you believe that all those allegations are true. What are you some kind of racist? You offer nothing yourself, only trying to de…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:49 PM

The question under consideration is whether a majority of accusations are false, or as feminist claim over and over again that the citizens of the West don't care enough about rape to put enough resources into a posed epidemic catastrophic situation, as feminist themselves describe it. All the corollary indicators I cited were meant to buoy my point. All that aside do you think it's one or the other or something completely different. Just state your case and stop trying to work around the questi…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:35 PM
3

That would be the point. What are the implications?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:27 PM
1

Amen brother, I'm beginning to think it is a shit hole.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:26 PM

Why don't you answer the question posed instead of being a baby about it. You won't do that though because your trying to get away with bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:24 PM
2

Yes the feminist don't like questions that go against their propaganda. If you ask a question like the one I asked above their first response is to feign outrage, then cite a flurry of unresponsive non-sequiturs to confuse the issue, next they respond with ad-hominem attacks, and if you are persistent they just cut off the conversation (ban you, delete you, censor), and go looking for some sucker to whom to give their spiel and then solicit a donation "to help the cause". One would hope that red…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:22 PM

So pointing out that women often make false allegations of rape -- that's rape we are talking about -- is what passes for being an asshole? Feminist claim that masculinity is toxic and patriarchy is what is holding them back from their aspirations. I am a dick for pointing this out. Where is your sense of proportion? Do you have one? This is a disagreement, a debate. If you have yet to realize it yet, in any debate each is saying to the other that they are wrong because they are ignorant, stupid…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:10 PM
2

This 29 yo women went to the police and claimed she was raped by an "Asian Guy" in a public place. You can interpret police disposition from the dozens of news reports, by some of the UK's most circulated publications. UK Law Enforcement has been "battered into submission" ( the great Inspector Gadget of Ruralshire) to say the politically correct thing. All power to the person who accused an "Asian Guy" of stranger rape. She will not be known or charged. Another no-crime in the excess of 20% of …
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 01:19 PM
3

I don't believe this account. It sounds to me like a story made up by a rape crisis counselor from one of the over 1100 local rape crisis centers that exist all across the U.S. These people will say anything. It's part of their work security program. All across Western civilization convictions for rape, as a percentage of recorded reports (note: recorded reports are much less than actual reports), is in the single digits. Rape culture advocates, in response to this situation, claim that all poli…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 11:32 AM
1

Yes only a couple of percent of reported rape allegations lead to conviction, and that is true across Western civilization. You need to understand though that the feminist are right. All across Western civilization, across all the law enforcement (LE) jurisdictions, and every last personality responsible for these matters, there is a giant conspiracy against women. When a rape complainer reports to any LE official they just laugh and laugh about another guy getting away with rape because they ar…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 09:16 PM
1

Attrition Studies. Hundreds have been done across Western Civilization, with subsequent meta-studies. They all show the same thing. A very low rate of convictions for rape and sex. assault charges, but also a low rate of false accusations. They are remarkably consistent. Since there is a low rate of convictions for the sexual charges, you would have to believe that every last law enforcement agency is rather complacent about women complaining about rape. That is just what rape culture advocates …
/r/MensRights05/08/17 03:40 PM
1

Also put it on Ben Stein's page
/r/MensRights30/07/17 08:07 PM
1

Yes I see that. It's already been deleted a number of times. I put it on the Fairstein biography page again just a moment ago. I keep it up until I get banned or something. The feminist want to censor any information contrary to their expressed views. Contradictory information is ignored and when necessary censored. Meanwhile they filled the zeitgeist with their propaganda. Their jobs depend upon their being the perception of a "rape culture". These people have devoted their lives to a lie. Thei…
/r/MensRights30/07/17 07:27 PM
1

Deleted again. Posted again.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 02:00 PM
1

People have edited everything I posted on Wikipedia -- style. But the insertion, at least, remains.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 01:00 PM
1

it's a copy of the article with the table of contents included.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 12:41 PM
1

Just re-entered an offering. We'll see how long it stays there.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 12:28 PM
1

Woke up this morning to find wikipedia "false accusation of rape" page altered with my offering deleted. I then added Linda Fairstein to "see also" as my offering to Fairstein's bio page is still there. though that's been edited by others. But it's still there!!!
/r/MensRights30/07/17 10:22 AM
1

Now I referenced it with http://imgur.com/a/MQjlg
/r/MensRights29/07/17 10:00 PM
4

It's back! I linked it to Fairstein's wikipedia page.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 09:54 PM
5

It's back!
/r/MensRights29/07/17 09:25 PM
1

see: http://imgur.com/a/MQjlg wherein "America's Top Sex Crime Expert": Linda Fairstein says half of rape complaints are false in black and white, then lied about it for decades and still does. see: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5lkxz8/americas_top_sex_crime_expert_says/
/r/MensRights29/07/17 12:28 PM
1

Karen: What about Linda Fairstein???
/r/MensRights29/07/17 11:54 AM
1

If you click on my username (gaffnymcguckin) and go read my other posts you will get an answer to your question. Long story short, my reconnoitering of the situation is somewhere along the lines of "America's Top Sex Crimes Expert" (ATSCE) who said half of all "known" rape reports are false, and that all many "known" rape reports aren't even recorded by police as ever happening. One municipality doesn't record half of all "known" rape complaints. More generally I think mentally debilitated women…
/r/MensRights28/07/17 06:18 PM
3

Actually it has four objectives, you've identified two: rehabilitation and deterrence. The other two are incapacitation and retribution.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 10:45 PM
2

If only that were true. I've previously made the point in other posts that white women often accuse black men of rape. One recent study from a good sample from a half of dozen American cities found that over 40% of the time when a white women complains of rape, she points her finger at a black man/men. There have been several famous examples of false allegations by a white women falsely claiming gang rape by a group of black men. Other studies the same results. But this is all political, and the…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 10:36 PM

Thanks for defending my work here Mens-Advocate. SpoonRiverSurfer. I got to figure you're not a troll. Take a look at all the info. I've provided. The best Indicator is students accusations against teachers. Everyone who knows about this situation, and they keep it close to their chest, knows that >95% to nearly all accusations are bullshit, and the feminist won't say a thing about it or apply the same pressure on public schools as they do everywhere else because the teacher's unions will shove …
/r/MensRights05/07/17 07:24 PM
2

To moderators of Men's Rights. You need to keep this post on the front page. Put in "HOT" and anywhere else it will be front and center. Don't be like America's big Men's Organizations and let the opinion of "America's top sex crime expert" pass from memory.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:58 PM
1

What's your point? Ok, Maybe I get it. You need to do a little extrapolation from my other post. Fairstein retired in 2002. She is lauded up until this present day. Go read some of the accolades. She was and is "America's top sex crime expert". One, of many, until recently, she was the CNN personality whenever a sex crime hits the public attention. There are still innumerable interviews of her by America's top news personalities. She is the MVP when it comes to sex crime analysis.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:48 PM

Across the West convictions as a percentage of reports are in the single digits. But that doesn't account for the reports that aren't counted in uniform crime reports (ucr). There has never been 4000 ucr rape reports in any year in all of NYC 5 boroughs, let alone just Manhattan. In one city, which for awhile released its incidents logs, while having a local reporter list all the crimes every week in a local newspaper column, especially the sex crimes. And a third party organization report list …
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:23 PM
1

In 2007 when Taylor/Johnson published best seller: Until Proven Innocent, the Dershowitz clip of the longer version became an issue. Taylor/Johnson again mis-sourced it, and an feminist academic published a critique of the book centered upon the supposed erroneous quote. Fairstein said to one friendly journalist that she had "no idea" where Taylor/Johnson got the quote. Taylor/Johnson retracted it and corrected the footnote. I contacted Taylor in October of last year. He contacted Fairstein, the…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:58 PM
1

See comment above. Sorry about that. Sometimes its hard to follow the conversation and who's saying what to whom. Best to hit "old first" above. Sorry.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:50 PM
2

I hear you.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:42 PM
2

I'm not sure how to copy and paste in reddit, but there is a lot of good info. there, some of which I commented on below. There are 1100 local rape crisis centers in the U.S. providing their enthusiast with a significant economic underpinning, and costing us all $billions/year. Over 40% of white women claiming rape say it was a "black guy", all backed up by 3 studies. The story of Fairstein's being a lying liar which Mens-Advocate links to, and a lot of other info. Some of which I got from check…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:14 AM
1

And it was Fairstein's, the proven liar, choice whether to plea bargain, take the case to court or just drop the whole matter. HOLY HELL!!!
/r/MensRights05/07/17 10:21 AM

At some point you need to draw a conclusion based upon the best evidence. Go read my other posts backed by studies.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:27 AM

Fairstein didn't change her mind, she got on board with the politically correct take on the matter. If she had spoken the truth at the time, it would have made a lot of difference in the way things progressed over the subsequent years. We might not have the "rape culture industrial complex as it exists today"
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:21 AM

As I said look up my posts, I don't have time to hand it to you on a silver platter. I told you there's a link on this page to a good one. Did you read the link in this post? Do some reading! Don't be an idiot!
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:03 AM

You might be right. We are all paying for 1100 rape crisis centers all across America. Remember the Idaho sheriff recently? He objected saying most all rapes the suspect wasn't in question and there no dispute sex took place, but most turned out to be false. The feminist had him issue a non-apology apology in a day and a half. We are now all paying for rape kits analysis. Millions of them at $1000/kit. For nothing. I wonder if some rape culture advocates bought stock in laboratory companies befo…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:57 AM
3

My question remains. Is anyone capable of getting some traction under this. I tried. Hell even the Men's Rights organizations were feckless. Even after they flew with the Dershowitz quote for years only to have Fairstein throw back in their face when she said prove it and they couldn't. Fairstein threw in the face of a Harvard trained lawyer (Taylor) and a tenured history professor (Johnson) when they again incorrectly sourced it in their 2007 best seller. Time of reckoning for Fairstein, "Ameri…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:29 AM
2

Different issue, different parameters, not relevant. Women have always used sex as a weapon. It's a behavioral thing. Before the feminist came around, the cops had no problem saying a majority of rape allegations were false. After the feminist got interested they learned to keep their mouth's shut. I composed a lot of posts, some of them have a lot of good info. For instance there's one citing three studies that shows that over 40% of the time when a white women cries rape she blames a black guy…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:20 AM
4

No I don't take idiocy well. Did you read the article? Here's an argument for you. Across Western civilization convictions as a percentage of reports is in the single digits, often the low single digits. If you would read the article and knew something, you would see that Fairstein says there are 4000 reports in Manhattan per year. I never noted 4000 reports in all 5 of New York city's boroughs in any given year let alone just Manhattan So the single digit conviction rate doesn't even begin to c…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:12 AM

That's America's top sex crime expert. But since you don't get the point, go read my other posts under my username. Mens-Advocate lists one of them above. If you can't read the linked article and understand the import, than I doubt you can ever be sure of anything. You probably incapable of arguing any point.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:56 AM
3

He wrote the article in either 1994 or 1995 that confirmed Fairstein's quote. It was in Commentary magazine. He quoted Fairstein, "there are 4000 reported rapes in Manhattan each year. Of these half simply didn't happen". So no, he's not off the hook. I'm not a Trump fan but the whole lot of the establishment was repudiated in the last election. The republicans when trump was nominated. Then the democrats when trump was elected. Dershowitz is a solid member of the establishment, along with Fairs…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:05 AM
3

What are these guys masochist??? Please hit me again. I'll pay you.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:55 AM

By the way I have contacted Dershowitz also. As far as I can tell, on this issue, he has his head firmly planted in his ass.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:18 AM

Yeah that would be extremely stupid of them. If true they shoud find other work. Perhaps they might better help society by doing something that requires less brain power.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:16 AM
3

It's good as gold, and nothing anyone says now can erase it. There are no contemporaneous sources objecting to the article. As a matter of fact Fairstein tried to ignore she said it for decades. She ignored, lied, ignore, lied, lied, and lied. Fairstein said it and Stein wrote it. Fairstein lied and ignored it until last October when I pointed it out to Stuart Taylor who contacted Fairstein and Stein. Fairstein lied again. Fairstein is no different then all those liars she said she dealt with fo…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:12 AM

So now you agree with me the men's rights organizations, on this matter have their heads firmly placed up their asses?? They made a pretty movie though, signifying nothing!
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:52 PM
3

I contacted MediaRadar with this info. also. As best as I can make out those people are asshats. Feckless like the rest of Men's rights organizations.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:49 PM

"top" was the way ABC and Virginia Law School referred to her. I'm not about to disagree with those two sources.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:48 PM
4

Yeah Fairstein's assessment was bandied about for a number of decades and put into Taylor/Johnson's best selling book about the Duke case, but they cited wrong, and Fairstein lied and claimed she never said it. I found it an alerted Taylor who then spoke with Fairstein and Stein. Both of them have stupid excuses. Go see my other posts for the story and links to the corrected footnotes for the book. My challenge remains, I've tried to get some traction on this, even had correspondence with Elam (…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:45 PM

That's America's top sex crime expert whose opinion your leery of. Go see my other post under my username. There are 1100 local rape crisis centers in the U.S., all primarily funded by the government. You think that's enough incentive to create a panic based on lies. There more info. in my posts. Being as convictions as percent of reports are in the single digits, the rape culture industrial complex as invented a giant conspiracy theory that the entire law enforcement structure across Western ci…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:36 PM

I have had correspondence with Taylor, Elam and Crouch. Taylor contacted Fairstein, I wrote about it at another post under my user name. Johnson and Taylor have two sets of footnotes, the other set is at Durham in Wonderland I believe. Taylor corrected that set with the story of contacting Fairstein and Stein. All three, I think are just interested in making money off the issue. I don't think any are truly interested at getting to the truth. That's my opinion. Go read my other post under my user…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:46 PM

Fairstein was in charge of Manhattan's DA's sex crime prosecution unit from 1976 until 2002. She was considered for job of U.S. attorney general by Bill Clinton. CNN correspondent regarding sex crimes. Go read my other posts. She is very eminent in the field. Considered as such by mainstream media.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:29 PM

See my other post regarding the fallacy of "rape culture". Regarding teachers assaulting students, in the UK it is well understood that greater than 95% to perhaps nearly all of students accusations against their teachers are bullshit. Despite this the "rape culture industrial complex" incessantly railing against "rape culture" they haven't a thing to say about the case of teachers. Their political force has the cops dissembling about the matter, but their afraid the teachers union's might spill…
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:43 PM
1

We do know why women make false allegations of rape. There are any number of studies on the reasons for them. Revenge, alibis, attention seeking and extortion are some of the reasons. Also (you can see the links at posts under my username) white women often claim their assailant was black. The feminist that study these matters don't usually note the relative complexions of the complainant and suspect, but a few studies made that mistake. It seems, according to "white rape complainants", that "bl…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:25 AM
1

Not only did she falsely claim a sexual assault, but she described her assailants as two black guys! Go to my postings (under my username) to learn that around 45% of cases in which a white women complains of sexual offense, she describes the suspect as black. I have listed three studies, done by members of the "rape culture" lobby, to back this fact.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 12:52 PM
1

At the end, trying not to digress to a great extent, this is a political struggle. Culture affects politics which affects laws and the judiciary: rules of evidence, burdens and standards of proof ect. So against the cultural meme of always believing the women, I present the words of America's Top Sex Crimes Expert. Western Jurisprudence, after centuries of clinical practice, arrived at the conclusion that the orderer of society (government) shouldn't deprive someone of liberty until those who ma…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 10:36 PM
1

It seems to me they should be on the same side???
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:09 PM

It makes me wonder about the hot button issues here versus there. Maybe it's just the difference in demographics between the two.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:08 PM
1

I thought the British Crime Survey (BCS), like the US National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) showed a smaller prevalence of sexual offense than the rape lobby's studies. Correct???
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:06 PM
1

That would be the George Costanza principle: "Jerry, just remember: if you believe it, it's not a lie."
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 06:38 PM
2

Who talked about this? Where?
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 06:33 PM
2

I think, if one was to comprehend the totality, and logic prevailed, the conclusion is inescapable. That that conclusion isn't the the prevailing consensus says a lot about Western civilizations ability to figure out what the best knowledge is, and to act in accordance with it. That's an evolutionary process, nut everyone should explicitly understand that feminism disputes a lot of things that are considered scientific fact by everyone else.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 02:06 PM
2

Yes and many don't get even get "recorded" as crimes (ie. an incident report gets generated). In one municipality that showed too much information, I noticed that half of the sexual offense reports, over a six month period, not reflected in their Uniform Crime Reports. You would be gobsmacked if I told you which city is was. That city even had a local paper which specifically had a reporter who covered the crime scene; noting every crime that occurred particularly sexual offenses. Over a six mon…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 01:40 PM
1

Actually everyone in law enforcement does understand that the vast majority of sexual offense reports are false, but few will say so. Look at what happened to that sheriff, not to long ago, who objected to the state legislature passing a bill that all rape reports would have DNA examinations. He said it was an unneeded expense in most rape complaints, as "stranger rapes" are very rare and the fact that sex happened with a known person is rarely disputed. He went on to add that most of the compla…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 01:24 PM
3

Actually there are a mountain of extant studies, all completed by members of the rape culture lobby. Part of the make-work initiative for the rape lobby. They are called attrition studies. The remarkable thing about these studies is every last one of them come to the same results. Convictions as a percentage of reports is in the single digits. To explain these results the rape lobby claims that every last law enforcement officials, everywhere in Western civilization, is part of a giant conspirac…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 01:05 PM
3

I not sure what you're trying to say. Read elsewhere in this thread where I note that real "stranger rapes" are almost unheard of. It was said by, I believe, a Montana sheriff said that DNA test are mostly unnecessary because there is usually no dispute whether sex took place (ie. the suspect is known and isn't saying sex didn't take place only that there was consent, in other words stranger rapes are very rare). The sheriff went on to say most all of reports are false. The rape lobby got on his…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 02:00 AM
8

Actually there's little chance anyone will ever come out from a bush. As one cop said, real stranger rapes "are more or less unheard of". Scores of cops have described them as rare, incredibly rare, very rare, ect.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 01:00 AM
4

I can honestly say I don't know one.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 12:56 AM
1

I have no idea what you're trying to say. On one of my submissions I linked to three "attrition studies", all of which showed, among other things, that white women accused minorities at least 40% of the time. I have reviewed around 50 of these studies from all across Western civilization, plus meta studies. All these studies say almost exactly the same thing: convictions as a percentage of reports is in the single digits. I know the statistics. But, even if you don't want to believe any of that,…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 12:54 AM
7

Across Western civilization, the conviction rate as a percentage of reports is in the single digits, usually the low single digits. The rape culture lobby, in the face of these statistics, asserts an endemic conspiracy in every last country, jurisdiction, and among every last investigator and prosecutor against the interest of women. Does that make any sense at all?? On the other hand, everyone understands, and not even the rape lobby has a thing to say about it, that >95%, to perhaps nearly all…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 12:37 AM
2

I been studying this issue for awhile, and it seems to be fading as an issue, as is the whole feminist movement. <20% of women in the US, <10% in UK will even deign to identify as feminist. That said the "Rape Culture Industrial Complex"has become a giant bureaucracy. There are 1100 local rape crisis center in the US alone, not to mention state and federal organizations; all of it receiving substantial government support. The women of my generation were credulous regarding all assertions of the …
/r/MensRights02/01/17 10:41 PM
6

The 'rape lobby" is attempting to change "burden of proof" and "standard of proof" for sexual offenses. In Texas they attempted to insert into the grand jury process a presentation to the jurors regarding supposed "rape myths" before grand juries heard evidence regarding whether evidence was sufficient for charges to be laid, Fortunately judges didn't allow it. Look at the fiasco that the whole new method "title IX" enforcement has become. This whole matter is a political matter. The Red Pill al…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 10:26 PM
5

And, all that said, if anyone should ever broach the issue of rape allegations, the Fairstein premise should always be asserted immediately. The entire conversation should be hinged off of Fairstein's assessment!!! QED!!!
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 09:25 PM
1

The UK tried to tighten up their rules and regulations regarding the recording of sexual offenses. That didn't work; it only made it more evident that many women were fabricating false allegations. So, now they are back to the strategy employed in the US of ditching the more ridiculous accusations; not even putting pen to paper and acknowledging all the false ones. And, so the game goes on, and everyone does the Sergeant Schutlz routine, including the feminist just trying to make it to retiremen…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 08:42 PM
2

Yes it does seem to be a bubble impervious to counter-evidence. In the end, it is a political struggle. Are we going to throw out the experience garnered from centuries of Western jurisprudence to placate a special-interest group whose initiative was misbegotten at the outset.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 08:31 PM
20

There is another aspect to the "Dershowitz snippet" of the entire passage contained in the article. I never noted 4000 rape reports per year ever acknowledged in Uniform Crime Reports for all of NYC's five boroughs; let alone just Manhattan. In 1990 there were 3126 for the whole city. Scores of municipalities across the US have been remonstrated for fudging their rape reports. See the threads of my other submissions for the story of Philadelphia unfounding 50% of their rape reports. In the end, …
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 08:22 PM

The article in Penthouse was authored by Ben Stein pursuant to an interview of Fairstein. Stein and Fairstein possessed the entirety of the agency for the articles production. And, also if you look at the table of contents for that Penthouse edition, you'll notice an article by Dershowitz listed right above the article about Fairstein, written by Stein. So saying the whole thing can be excused because the article appeared in Penthouse is specious. Further, if read into the matter, and comprehend…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 07:59 PM

Problem with relenting on the point is the number of Women Studies graduates the "Rape Culture Industrial Complex" employs. There are 1100 local rape crisis centers in the US alone. That not to mention state and national organizations. Much of the funding of these centers comes from all levels of government: federal, state and local all make a contribution. Rape culture has become the prime money-maker for the feminist movement. The women's movement is an active animated special interest group f…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 07:25 PM

Rather decisive, and yet even that doesn't quite get to the whole matter. Across Western Civilization, the percentage of convictions, in terms of reports, is in the single digits. In response the rape culture lobby claims a vast conspiracy endemic to every country down to every local jurisdiction and police officer and prosecutor. It seems, according to the rape culture lobby that everyone everywhere could care less about women getting raped. Or on the other hand, it could be that a high percent…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 04:09 PM

That would be the point!
/r/MensRights02/01/17 03:58 PM
1

I got to tell you, your censoring my post because I refer to a post at another sub-reddit is stupid!!!
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 02:36 PM
1

Just go over to my post of today at Men's Rights. The implications of that story explains a lot. Can't put the link here because a bot will censor the post. Just click on my username and click on submissions. Its easy.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 02:32 PM

Yeah, I didn't understand it either. For the amount of discussion regarding this issue, you would thing the top expert making such a definitive assessment would be very probative regarding the truth of the matter. What really confused me is that I also informed (via email) all the men's rights organizations and hardly heard a peep out of them. Pierce Harlan seemed to think it was significant, and said he would post it @ COTWA, but then claimed health problems prevented him form working. Paul Ela…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 01:54 PM
1

So Fairstein and Stein had no agency at all in the production of the article? They just verbalized what the publishers and editors of the porno magazine told them to say. I got to say your arguments are rather tenuous. your arguments wouldn't survive the scrutiny of a competent junior high student. I got to say, you don't appear to be the sagacious expert you present yourself as.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 12:18 PM
1

the first study i cited was by Lonsway and Archambault (making a difference project), if you don't think they are legit (from the feminist perspective) then no one is legit and the whole "rape culture" meme is fabricated. The most recent one (3rd) was by a rapid rape culture warrior from the UK. So the evidence presented by the rape culture lobby is pejorative to their assertions; extrapolating your words.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 12:15 PM
1

No, as I demonstrated via three "studies", the range of reported stranger rapes ranges between 10% to 25%. Back of the envelope, in US presuming 100,000 reported rapes per years; the range could be <1000 stranger rape reports to ~ 25,000 stranger rapes per year. You assert ~ 5000 (5%) per year. Which is it?
/r/MensRights23/12/16 11:24 AM
1

I have noticed that the "rape culture" lobby likes to bring up cases and play them towards their theory of "victimization", as opposed to relying upon hard cold statistics gained from studies. For the purposes of this conversation, let's stick to the statistics, like the one where "america's top sex crines expert" said half of rape complaints are false.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 11:24 AM
1

We do agree that the occurrence of true "stranger rape" is incredibly rare; less that 1% of all rape complaints? Right?
/r/MensRights23/12/16 10:41 AM
1

I'm done here, except to say that if anything you said is true you can prove it by getting Fairstein and Stein's explanation for the article they mutually produced in 1987. Other than that I'm done.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 09:59 AM
1

I am sure Morgenthau, like everyone, would be pleased if other people often made use of his quotes. This whole conversation began when you insinuated I might be lying. I have well answered all of your objections! So, now, what's good for the goose? If you are who you portray, saying you personally know Fairstein, Stein and Morgenthau. I'll await you actions, and report of those actions, after you've discussed with all three the import of what I have submitted in "black and white" regarding "Amer…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 11:57 AM
1

So we agree that "stranger rape" cases are incredibly rare, and just about everyone reported is false. Further, as you have seemed to aver yourself, you are an expert, so you understand the kinds of evidence available to prove rape cases. You are probably also aware of the common "rules of evidence". How these rules apply in criminal cases, and how there are exceptional rules for rape cases. Do I need to cover this ground for you? Do you agree with "Blackstone's formulation"?
/r/MensRights22/12/16 11:33 AM
1

Oh by the way, based upon everything I have seen regarding this magazine article, it's pretty clear Fairstein is prevaricating. Also she was cited for withholding exculpatory evidence in one case, and still defends her actions in the Central Park 5 case, which have been popularly and legally repudiated. As Morgenthau averred, he guesses his trust in Fairstein was misplaced.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 03:18 PM
1

Regardless of what you think I am implying, do asked Fairstein and Stein about the article I have brought to your attention. Actually both are on record about it. You can see that record in my submissions under my username. Then, all anyone can expect of you is that you honestly and objectively portray what you have discovered. History is rife with people going along with popular sensibilities. Some, though, have had the insight to look objectively at what they confront. Which are you? To answer…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 03:11 PM
1

Great! I look forward to it.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 04:43 PM

Pierce: Here's a link, very clear one, of the Linda Fairstein article. http://imgur.com/a/MQjlg
/r/MensRights18/12/16 01:41 PM
1

Here's a good link to the whole Fairstein article: http://imgur.com/a/MQjlg Look especially at the top of continuation page 118. Also see her responses to the discovery of these assertions at another of my submissions (at links) under my username. In 2007 she lied about it then just two months ago she lied about it again. Also see response of author Ben Stein the author of the article. I do appreciate the engagement, but lack the time to say more now. However next time you are defending someone …
/r/MensRights17/12/16 03:55 PM
1

Now you're just being totally ridiculous. The conviction rate as a percentage of reports to police is the same across western civilization; in the single digits. Everyone understands, and no one refutes, not even the feminist, the percentage of false reports in students sexual accusations against teachers is >95% to perhaps nearly all. The feminist won't say a thing about this understanding because they know teacher's strong and powerful unions won't stand for their profession being falsely besm…
/r/MensRights15/12/16 11:40 AM
1

While I appreciate your inclination to engage in a discussion, I think we are talking past each other. 1.) the % of stranger rapes reported in the 3 studies at the other posting I mentioned was >20%, 32% and 8%, the last one based on a sample of police files the first 2 bases on sequential reports at the relevant jurisdictions. As you mentioned you understand that true stranger rapes are incredibly rare. The last study, based upon a sampling probably had the more ridiculous stranger reports filt…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 11:12 PM

Leaving aside for the moment what I understand or don't, I think, along the predominate vectors, we agree on some crucial points. 1.) If you look at the three studies linked, and I haven't check those studies on this particular point, but coinciding with all other similar studies, the proportion of "stranger rapes" of any sample is commonly between 10% to 25%. I think we both agree nearly all of these "stranger rapes" are false, and agree that "stranger rape" is "less that 1% of rape", or "more …
/r/MensRights08/12/16 03:16 PM
1

Have studied the UK situation with this issue intently. If you think I can help in anyway, don't hesitate to contact me.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:57 PM
1

At another post (see the submissions under my username; its the one about white women frequently accusing black guys), ~15% of the complaints to police were declared false, then another 60% didn't get to far because the complainant failed to cooperate with the investigation. Prosecutors will usually charge a false report based upon the actions of the complainant. For instance did the complainant name a suspect who subsequently spent time being question by police or even arrested, or did she make…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 11:38 PM
1

Even in the UK where over the last couple of decades reports to police have increased 700%, though convictions haven't even doubled, and with the matter at a frothing level, and a cast of characters examining every police move in these matters, the police still are caught hiding ridiculous complainants from public view if they think they can get away with it. Decades ago, before the exponential increase in reports, convictions were 25% of complaints, now they are around 5%. The rape culture init…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 05:45 PM

For any predominate social parameter, at least their exist some firm statistics we might rely upon. I find it incredible that for criminal sexual offenses there is such a wide disparity in estimates about reality. There was anther study on post-conviction DNA analysis done, I think within the last decade. It analyzed convictions from the state of Virginia and concluded that 1 in 5 convictions were errant. For non-sexual capital crimes the numbers were even more horrific. From a sample of only 12…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 03:31 PM
5

Why would you imagine that? I noticed one city (which I won't name) who made the mistake (within today's zeitgeist, law enforcement speaking honestly about the true nature of if rape and sexual assaults is considered a mistake) of releasing their incident report logs to the public. Curious thing about this city was they were on a transparency kick (that stopped!), and had a third party also shift their crime reports for certain details to be disclosed to the public, and had 2 active newspaper ou…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 10:10 AM

You suspect I might be lying. Generally, that will always be an astute question; always has been, and, disconcertingly, probably always will be. Actually, and I am sure you understand this, it is one of three general possibilities; combinations of any these three eliciting even more possibilities. Generally, each side of a debate, at a foundational level, is asserting the opposition is stupid, ignorant, lying, or some combination of any of the three. In our present debate, you jumped right to th…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 02:43 PM
1

So what? I just noticed that. So what? I got to say your perceptions, in these matters are 180 degrees out of sync with reality. Further I loved to show you where you are entirely wrong. As a primer, as I previously mentioned, go read my submissions under my username, and probably also my subsequent comments to these posts. All I have to offer you is a true depiction of reality. Is that enough for you? I've got to say, based upon you above comment, you might need a little brushing up, and I do s…
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:39 PM
1

JebberJabber, you, of all people, should know better than to casually throw around the word insane! Also, and I can't believe I have to say this to you, of all people, you shouldn't invoke the label "conspiracy theory" for a involved manner about which you have insufficient understanding. I have a link to the article up now. It's blurry but readable. This is far from insane! Good information regarding these matters is hard-wrought; especially in the US. The UK is more transparent. In the US the …
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:14 PM
1

I certainly thought so, but surprisingly I shopped this whole episode to prominent people on our side of these issues for wider exposure, and they ignored it. I got a little cross at them about ignoring it. I wasn't taking it personal, for we wouldn't know each other from Adam, but was more motivated towards spreading the information. They seemed to get even more cross at me for me getting cross at them. All this transpired over the last few days. I'm going to let it rest for a day, and then mak…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 09:14 PM
1

Yes that is the link to my former post regarding the the Linda Fairstein affair. Didn't have time to look it up when I posted this. Thank you for giving the address, though in the link you provided you can replace the np with www and vote and comment all you want. Now if someone could get the original PENTHOUSE article from the Honey Badger Brigade website and load it to an address everyone at this post can get at from here, that would be good. Anyone with the skills?
/r/MensRights02/12/16 01:18 PM
3

The subject of anonymity has been beaten to death in the UK. The rape culture lobby is fundamentally against it at any stage, feeling that the police should alert the press regarding any suspects to any sexual offenses almost as soon as the complaint is made. There are variations, some feeling that there should be no public disclosure until arrest, or charges, or conviction. One very peculiar thing though, while the rape lobby has thwarted any attempts at anonymity at any stage for sexual offens…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 11:25 AM

Google +rape+attrition+study. you should get a number of different results. I have reviewed scores (attrition studies) of them, and you should be able to find any number of them. "a Gap or a Chasm" is one that went from report to all case outcomes. Others only follow cases through to actual charges. These studies track sequences of rapes reports at some jurisdiction during some period of time. The startling thing about them is the uniformity of results. All show convictions as percentage of repo…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 10:52 AM
2

This case correlates one of a number of reasons women often make false rape allegations, namely, as in this case, shame over an impulsive hook-up, with another predominate attribute of false rape accusations, identifying the suspect as a minority. Sampling a number of rape complaints, as is done in attrition studies -- studies of reported rapes -- two things are always found. 1.) In any cohort of samples, between 10% to 25% will be reported as stranger rapes (the complainer says she has no prior…
/r/MensRights28/11/16 11:36 AM

It seems like a cult to me.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 01:14 AM
1

Arrest is bad enough but it doesn't equal a "charge" from which a prosecution proceeds. Cops can charge, but not any longer in rape cases. The practice now is for prosecutors to decide on charges for any kind of sexual offenses. Arrest is different and cops arrest people all the time without any charges ever being filed.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 10:43 AM
1

google: making a difference project. If you get to a violence against women page, there should be a link at the upper right hand of the page under research results I think. The Making a Difference Project, initially seemed like a good endeavor but the results came back so contrary to the views of the feminist architects, that they didn't even write a report about it. To please the people who financed it they merely threw out a bunch of numbers which you can find at the link I previously mentione…
/r/MensRights27/11/16 10:39 AM
0

If you look at the studies, called attrition studies, the rate or stranger rapes, where the claimed suspect was previously unknown to the complainant is usually between 10% to 25% of the reports. The studies don't usually put these unsolved reports in the false category because that would involve proving a negative. The police will tell you though, that true stranger rapes are "more or less unheard of" or "less than 1% of rape", but not in front of a feminist, or for public consumption. The poli…
/r/MensRights27/11/16 10:29 AM

There might be a difference between a truly false claim versus a withdrawn claim or not. If the complainant doesn't cooperate with the investigation, the investigation stops, and the suspect in relieved of jeopardy, it is often never determined a true or false claim. As for false claims from malice, there are lists of reasons (derived via research) why women make false claims, and there is evidence that women resort to false accusations frequently out of malice. Once you utter the word to the po…
/r/MensRights27/11/16 10:08 AM

I got censored and banned on feminist subreddits for saying things that though true, they didn't like. Let the counter-arguments be made. They can be refuted. Don't be like the feminist. To achieve progress the debate needs to take place.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 09:46 AM
2

Its not all women. Only 20% of women is the US, around 10% in UK identify as feminist. Even a majority of women understand that there is something askew in the personalities of ardent feminist and don't want to be associated with the movement. What most women don't understand is that the modern feminist movement has a dearth of substantive issues to make a fuss about. If you go to NOW's website and click on issues there isn't a whole lot there. And, of what is there about a third of it doesn't s…
/r/MensRights27/11/16 01:42 AM

Linda Fairstein, the greatest sex crimes prosecutor of all time said false rape accusations where 50% of reports, then lied claiming she never said it. Across Western civilization convictions in terms of reports is in the single digits, to which the rape culture advocates insinuate a giant conspiracy against women existent in every western country. Everyone is out to get them and rape them, according to these advocates. They are rather animated about the "rape culture" we all inhabit. If you wan…
/r/MensRights26/11/16 01:20 PM
0

Keep it it up please. My literary agent thrives on all the immaturity. You know what would be real mature. Put my original post where it belongs on the front page of this subreddit. Face it your screwed either way. Put it back and your world view will be obliterated, or don't; same result. Though if you don't, all of reddit will be called into question. That ought be a real scrum. And your propaganda platform will cease to have any relevance to anyone. Your choice. Good for me either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 06:56 PM
1

Put my post back up. Then it can be debated; like the title of this subreddit purports to imply. Otherwise your censorship is just more ammunition against your cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 06:18 PM
1

You do understand that upvoting and downvoting are different from censorship, right???
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 06:07 PM
1

And the moderators of this subreddit are acting like Gods! Just put my post about how the greatest sex crime prosecutor of all time said that half of rape complaints are false. You are avioding that Issue!!! Just do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 06:05 PM
1

So to your mind censorship is justified? Other than that question the rest of your comment is indecipherable. They subreddit just censored a post I created. Are you good with that or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 06:02 PM
1

All just bullshit. Put my post back where it belongs And we can discuss how the all time greatest sex crime prosecutor said that half of rape reports are false. Let's have a real discussion about the supposed rape culture not your technical and procedural objections to my presentation of the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 05:57 PM
1

You are an idiot! And again I'll note you will be discredited, I will discredit all the feminist subreddits, as I am in the process of discrediting feminism. Note, I was the one who cleared up the Fairstein lie with the authors of Until Proven Innocent. Everything will be know. You are also discrediting reddit! I will keep posting here, and if you follow form you will ban me, which is indicative of your con job. Hiding behind the pretense of debate, but actually just a propagandist. Go a head ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 05:50 PM
1

Referring to my previous comments in this thread, and the post I composed which is still being censored, and regardless of whatever is happening anywhere else in the world, Is anyone trying to posit that censorship is true, right and correct? Anyone???
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 05:44 PM
1

upvoting and downvoting is a different issue. censoring though is another thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 05:41 PM
1

Haven't been there but even assuming your correct, are you attempting to justify censorship?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 05:39 PM
1

The very title of the subreddit contains the word debate. Don't you know the definition of the word debate? Do you understand how debate works?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 05:31 PM
1

See my comment to your objection below. Put it in the wrong place. Still getting up to speed with reddit procedures. Know, my comments noted below will go further then this place. You doubt me at peril to yours and all of reddit's credibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 05:14 PM
1

One point among others in light of the greatest sex crimes prosecutor saying half of reports are false is that criminal conviction given the uncorroborated word of a complainant should be impossible in a civilized court
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 05:10 PM
1

Any opinions in the post are the result of an abundance of facts preceding the opinion. Are you too much of a gentle soul to inculcate opinion grounded in facts. You discredit your subreddit and all of reddit by censoring my post. This is really how reddit seems to work. Reddit is a number of bubbles, in which all bubbles are impenetrable by those with facts contrary to the ordained realities of those inside the bubbles. You need to put my post where it belongs and stop the censoring.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 05:06 PM
1

While innumerable anecdotes do undermine the whole rape culture initiative, industrial strength evidence will have a greater effect. The supposed greatest sex crimes prosecutor of all time, Linda Fairstein, once claimed that half of rape complaints were false, then lied and stated she never said any such thing. See story at: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5699vo/false_rape_allegations_half_of_reports_are_false/ Further, as a political matter, it is evident that these demented false…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/16 01:07 PM
1

My metaphor may be apt to a degree, but as with any medical malady there are predominate vectors. It was only in the last decade I really delved into psychiatry to any great extent. It's epidemiology astounded me. In retrospect it explained a lot. I have noted some accomplishments; many maladies have become eminently treatable. Lithium for bi-polar for instance and many other variations of mood disorders. Though there is a lot more work to be done. And, the people suffering are often the ones wh…
/r/MensRights11/11/16 01:35 AM

I agree, there is a lot of further research that needs to be accomplished in the field of psychiatry, and we have often gone off in errant directions. For example, the Univ. of Cal. neurological scientist (can't remember his name at the moment) who discovered he had psychopathic (anti-social personality disorder according to DSM) tendencies after viewing his own CAT scan, then double checked the results with other clinical tests. Psychiatrist were divided over whether he actually was really a ps…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:15 PM

I believe you might be right about the timing of that "moral panic". More in the eighties then nineties. That famous one from Los Angeles all started with the phantasm of a debilitated, mentally unstable woman, which then grew to epic proportions, not only in that particular case, but across Western civilization. The feminist were on-board all the way, and weighed-in on the whole recovered memory fight that was eventually decided against its promoters. That academic fight another example of scie…
/r/MensRights08/11/16 12:10 PM
1

Only around 20% of women in the US will self-identify as feminist, around 10% in the UK. Feminist theory denies agreed scientific facts when it conflicts with their philosophy. We need to move beyond the current extant generations of feminist philosophers. Ultimately we are trying to reach a social contract that applies to all people, regardless of race or sex. Feminist on the other hand are resorting to a passe tribal construction. Identity politics is still the means used to gain political pow…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 10:18 AM
1

For lack of a viable alternative, I am hopeful things might be worked out before it's too late. One thing for sure, from a historical view, the last half century, starting in the sixties, were epic. A lot of things happened in a short time. I suppose it was only natural that it would take a while to inculcate everything then work out a new resolution. We are limited creatures.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 08:31 PM

Malthus said a fertility rate over 2.13 (on average, women bare 2.13 children that make it to child baring age) and populations grow; less and they decline. Both ways at exponential rates. Feminist are so sensitive and ready to cast aspersions, men (at least the smart ones) keep all women at a distance. The downside of misunderstandings outweigh the possibility of something positive occurring. And the fertility rate across Europe is probably around 1.5. A few generations of that and then the ser…
/r/MensRights06/11/16 08:06 PM
1

Yeh, I remember that. There was one case out in Los Angeles that was the most expensive trial ever in the US. No one was convicted, but one guy was in jail for 5 years before it all got sorted out. The cops say it's the same when a stranger rape case comes in. The amount of time spent on those is unimaginable. The cops know that it is infinitesimally possible a real stranger rape happened, but they go through all the extensive motions, regardless of how off the complainant seems, because it's ea…
/r/MensRights06/11/16 06:28 PM
1

Yes, that's one of the main rationals for all those rape crisis centers. Whenever someone reports a rape, or sexual offense to police, the police call the local rape crisis center for someone to guide the complainant through the process, and as rape culture advocates assert, to make sure the police do their job. The whole thing aggravates a lot of earnest police officers because it is supposedly their job to be looking out for justice. Also, this is how the rape crisis centers earn money, for us…
/r/MensRights06/11/16 06:00 PM
1

Linda Fairstein, supposedly the greatest sex crimes prosecutor of all time, did say half of rape complaints were false See: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5699vo/false_rape_allegations_half_of_reports_are_false/ Also white women like accusing black men of rape see: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/58cjkm/white_women_crying_rape_often_accuse_black_quys/
/r/MensRights05/11/16 10:15 AM
1

For lack of any other viable alternative, we all might, at least, hope things do change.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:38 PM
1

There's all kinds of people asserting all kinds of things. It's hard to shift through to whom one should listen, and what is important. In these kinds of endeavors, the general rule would be more is better, but, of course in practical moderation. Another general rule would be you're certain to be wrong on some level if you fail to give the slightest heed to oppositional views.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:15 PM
1

Taking a side in a debate about the truth, and strongly asserting you believe you're right, I fairly certain, doesn't rise to the level of megalomania. Words are curious things though, worthy of extended contemplation.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:08 PM
2

Regardless of any fetishes that might be in operation. Women have a motive to always appear chaste in their sexuality. That motive, among others noted by experts, as a prominent reasons, for false rape allegations.
/r/MGTOW20/10/16 12:31 PM
2

Go look at the studies. The predominate take-away is that most rape allegations are false. Those of white women claiming a white suspect, and also those claiming a black suspect. I'm sure you don't mean to imply that black men have a proclivity for raping white women.
/r/MGTOW20/10/16 12:26 PM
2

As for legal standards, I understand what you are getting at. I would say two things. To bring a cause to court, those making the charge have the burden of proof in proving the charge. As for relationships between men and women, in many states, the courts have simply demurred from rendering any judgements regarding counterclaims in divorce proceedings: No-Fault Divorce states. In the end, if the courts are unable to distinguish what is true, might we all say nothing is proven, and there is no ca…
/r/MGTOW20/10/16 12:23 PM
2

Along with all the protection the upper class possesses, the guarding of their sensibilities is also an imperative. Among the prominent literary glitterati, they deem their societal philosophy as their stock-in-trade. Any disturbance of those predicates harms them as much as an attack against their bodies or possessions. Any honest examination of their rape-culture affirmations is sure to leave these people dispossessed.
/r/MGTOW20/10/16 12:14 PM
3

Weaponizing sex and then bullying people with the weapon
/r/MGTOW20/10/16 04:13 AM
3

Go to the studies cited in the post. That is industrial-strength evidence of the phenomenon.
/r/MGTOW20/10/16 04:12 AM
5

And if a few black guys need to pay some of the cost for that protection, that's nothing to white women.
/r/MGTOW20/10/16 04:10 AM
2

At this point, the rape culture lobby is so far out on a limb, it's hard to imagine how they can back-off their extreme positions without everyone involved being personally totally discredited. That phenomenon demonstrates how insane the whole thing is. Insanity is the underlying precondition of all "moral panics".
/r/MensRights20/10/16 04:02 AM
2

Cops have enough problems, don't need aggravation from the rape culture lobby. The rape culture lobby is so omnipresent, its easier to deal with all the false accusations, and then pander the lobby than it is to stand-up to it.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 02:09 AM
2

Thanks! And thanks for commenting; I remember your comments. Yes I have read at least 50 attrition studies; the bottom line is always the same; even factoring in all the expedient fudging that goes-on at all times and in every space. As I noted in the previous post, no one is even sure of the number of reports were pen is never put to paper because the police just dismiss a lot of complaints out of hand. As previously noted one municipality didn't include half of complaints in their totals.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 09:48 PM
1

It's in there. Read the whole post, and my other one at the link, if you want a good appraisal of the whole phenomenon.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 08:37 PM

I don't think your interpretation quite gets at the gist of that previous sorrowful situation. However I would say that feminist are trying to weaponize sex. This tactic has precedents even before the advent of the rape culture lobby. To cite a couple of examples, read about the U.S. alcohol prohibition movement and the draft resistance movement during the Vietnam war. There are were other less infamous instances of this phenomenon; those are just two of the more famous. All that said, several i…
/r/MensRights19/10/16 08:36 PM
2

I noticed in the table of contents for this PENTHOUSE edition that Alan Dershowitz also contributed an article. I remember that a Dershowitz essay regarding false rape allegations also references Fairstein's estimate, but didn't give the source; other then to say it was from a 1987 interview. To read Dershowitz's essay, go to Community of the Wrongly Accused.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 06:19 PM
1

Go to post https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5699vo/false_rape_allegations_half_of_reports_are_false/ Then spread the word!
/r/askTRP19/10/16 05:56 PM
1

I have a copy of the article. It's right there in black and white, and if you go to the provided links, you'll see its been verified. So, I'll attribute your assertions to lack of reading comprehension skills.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 04:11 PM

It's amazing, just position at the top of the page and hit reload over and over again, the score goes up and down constantly.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 11:52 PM

It seems a lot of people don't like my comment about the 3126 reported rapes in all of NYC 1990, but Fairstein claiming there was 4000 rape reports a year in just Manhattan.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 11:50 PM

Just hit reload a dozen times. Up to 72 down to 65 up to 70 down to 66. Changed every time. Let that be a lesson; if you post something contrary to feminist orthodoxy, don't tell them about like I did. I was trying to engage them, but now I understand they won't engage in a fair debate. I guess I should have known that.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 10:49 PM

Wow, the downvote brigade are working over this post. Still changing from moment to moment.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 10:39 PM
1

This could be a case-study to find out whether reddit has the resonance to break through the din. I have passed this post along to various prominent counter-feminist organizations. Haven't noticed any reply from that realm. We'll see.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:26 PM

It seems the upvoting and downvoting are continuing unceasingly. A couple of times I just hit reload long enough to see the score, and it changes moment to moment. It also seems to be a draw, with the score fluctuating as low as 63, but never rising higher than 72.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:23 PM
1

You have a good memory. That is probative evidence. The most amazing thing about this whole story, to me, is that 'the cat did get stuffed into a bag' and only now has made its way out. How did that happen??
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:06 PM
4

Yes that point is often invoked. All kinds of cost and disruptions. Imagining reality, at its best manifestation, as a harmonic, well-known symphony. When a slight askew note is sounded, everyone can move on without much distraction from the beauty of what is being played. A sexual assault allegation is like the kettle drummer falling over into the horn section. Particularly for younger people in school, routine and smooth functioning is conducive to what is trying to be accomplished. A false al…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 06:19 PM

Well at least the thread is being looked at and considered. I just the reload button a dozen times, the vote fluctuated up and down by the moment. Shouldn't that qualify it as controversial? PS: I put a post over at twox and told them to go have a looksee. Apparently I'm witnessing the infamous downvote brigade about which I've only previously heard-of as the stuff of legend. Seems like its active on this post. Just did it again, shaping up to be a real battle. Time to make some popcorn.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 05:26 PM
2

Yes, that's a knock-on effect of the whole rape culture initiative. To some extent I think, in the dynamic complexity of evolution, perhaps the whole rape culture thing was a reaction to the sexual revolution, a misbegotten initiative. At any rate, more libertine attitudes are on the wane, and the rape culture thing is a driving force towards that end. By the way, put your comment on the link thread, I think it will contribute to the conversation.
/r/MGTOW10/10/16 05:10 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5699vo/false_rape_allegations_half_of_reports_are_false/ New to posting, but I'm learning. Not easy read, but Industrial strength insight. Will well-arm you for debating topic.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 03:47 PM
1

Thanks! SnapshillBot
/r/MGTOW10/10/16 03:43 PM
1

For industrial strength insight into the rape culture initiative see link. It's a challenging read, and a sordid story, but fairly conclusive. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5699vo/false_rape_allegations_half_of_reports_are_false/
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 03:16 PM
2

For industrial strength insight into the rape culture initiative see link. It's a bit of a challenging read but spells out a lot of what's going on. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5699vo/false_rape_allegations_half_of_reports_are_false/
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/16 02:59 PM

Stop focusing on anecdotes. On another current thread: False rape allegation - half of reports are false, say America's most eminent experts, you will find industrial strenght social evidence that the rape culture initiative is a scam. The information in that thread needs to be circulated and upvoted. Thousands of false cases have been publicized and there's some value to it, but if start looking at the matter from the viewpoint of statistics the truth of the matter becomes obvious to even the d…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:59 PM
1

A few comments: The subject matter of the post could have huge implications, which probably many here might not realize, but trust me if this whole matter got any traction it would be an embarrassment to a lot of people, and would require a lot of strained and unconvincing replies. The counter-forces to feminism are unorganized, and I would aver not up to the task, but this may be a function of the relative forces. As to the public opinion in the UK, many newspapers have desisted from allowing c…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:52 PM
2

Did you read my reply? Still think my assertions are rubbish? What say yee?
/r/MensRights08/10/16 01:27 PM
1

Go to the post referenced on the edited OP. that's what I'm talking about!
/r/MGTOW08/10/16 01:22 PM
1

Go to the thread referenced in the edited OP. that's what I'm talking about!
/r/MGTOW08/10/16 01:21 PM
1

go to the post referenced in the edited OP. That's what I'm talking about.
/r/MGTOW08/10/16 01:20 PM
1

Go to the post referenced in the original edited OP. that's what i'm talking about!
/r/MGTOW08/10/16 01:17 PM
1

Go to the post referenced in the OP to this thread. That's what I'm talking about!
/r/MGTOW08/10/16 01:16 PM
1

Go to the post reference in the original edited OP on this thread. That's what I'm talking about!
/r/MGTOW08/10/16 01:15 PM
1

Go to the post referenced in the OP, that'a what I'm talking about!
/r/MGTOW08/10/16 01:14 PM
1

go to thread in other post referenced in edited OP, there is the crux of the matter and it's illuminative!
/r/MGTOW08/10/16 01:13 PM
1

Also there have been more than a few respected police officer who have spoken on the record about the true nature of the situation, with little push-back. Not as bluntly as Gadget but fairly straight forward for those with ears to hear. One certainty that has been wrought from this candidness, is that stranger sexual offenses are "extremely rare" or "more or less unheard of" or "less than 1% of rape". Not as the gradual concessions that have been made by the "rape culture lobby" over the decades…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 10:17 PM

Ian Blair former head of the Met Police wrote a book about the subject in which Mr. Blair himself said the belief among the police is that between 50% to 70% of accusations were false. But even that was a cropping of the true beliefs for public consumption. The immortal Inspector Gadget where frustrated bobbies went to vent (he used to get 100's of comments from police for everyday posts, 1000's when something was happening like the riots that swept England, I think in 2012 was it) put a blunt p…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 09:52 PM

Oh forgot to mention, I responded to the Mods over at Feminist and Ask feminist about them banning me. Talked about the mature aspects of looking at reality for what it is, and apparently that was too much for them. So, now I am not even allowed to message them for 72 hours. Tender constitutions I guess.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 06:16 PM

It's bad in the UK. Really, in the UK, it seems the general public is more and more marginalizing the whole rape culture thing. It seems like they have more local newspapers in the UK, and the false rape stories seem to outnumber the true ones 10 to 1. If you read the comments to all those stories it seems that when a women cries rape in the UK, the public pretty much seems to assumes its bull. All the rape culture advocates complain about all the false rape stories in the newspapers, but it see…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 06:04 PM
1

I confess I'm new to reddit and still figuring it out. I posted, then the post seem to have disappeared. Nonetheless there is substantive and significant information in the post, and in the end, technical issues, or professed inconvenience ain't going to make them go away, or serve as an excuse. I intend to make a point of it. So, anyone resistent to inculcating the entirety, might as well just give in to inevitability and get on with addressing my assertions, instead of foisting petards in the …
/r/MensRights07/10/16 03:22 PM

Just got banned from the Feminist and Ask Feminist sub reddits for referring to this post. Also 2x in hiding my posts. Don't these people understand such actions merely magnify how mistaken they are. Censorship, in the long-run always fails, and to the total detriment of the censors. Seems some people have some things to learn, and it's looking like I'm going to have to be the person to teach them.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 03:03 PM
1

Only superficially familiar with the whole red pill thing, and don't think I possess a lot of interest. Actually this is my first foray into reddit, but I'm already learning. The predominate thrust of my original post goes to the percentage of false reports to all reports of rape. I'm going to stay there for awhile.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 01:21 PM

Go read the links. It's a sure thing. Posted it over at 2x, first one didn't show up later, so I posted it again. Thread got going then also disappeared from a search. It's good and I'm not going to let it go. I'll harp on it as long as necessary until it breaks through.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 01:12 PM
10

In 1990, 3126 recorded for the whole city. Makes you think. The problem in Philadelphia was, I guess, the cops were recording all of them, but then unfounded over 50% of them. As I said in the post, the Philadelphia Police Commissioner came up through the NYC dept. then went to Philly. When Philly got called out for unfounding so many rapes, he complained NYC doesn't unfound rapes because they don't even bother recording all the false ones, that way they don't get aggravation for deeming so many…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 04:16 AM
3

Yeh. I would have liked to heard that conversation. Gotta wonder how all the rape culture advocates are going to react to this. America's preeminent expert sells them out. I would like to see Fairstein and Stein and Taylor and Johnson all on TV at the same time trying to sort this out. Is Stein going to say what he wrote was a product of his own imagination. He ain't going to say that. There is no way to sell that line. I have a copy of the article. In it Fairstein goes on for some lenght about …
/r/MensRights07/10/16 03:37 AM
6

Yeh, I liked to see this matter get some traction. Fairstein has been been out front supporting the Rape Culture initiative for a couple of decades now. I guess she thought she would never be found-out. She made the mistake of being candid, then caught on to the way the political winds were blowing and decided to ride that wave regardless of what she had to say. Makes you wonder about the ethics she practiced when trying cases.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 03:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter