TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Galilaeus_Modernus Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by Galilaeus_Modernus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

That's basically every trait because that's how evolution works. The real question is why did the Dutch have such a stronger selection gradient compared to other cultures?
/r/BlackPillScience04/08/26 10:53 AM
32

Beauty appears to be universal. There are objective measures of beauty.
/r/BlackPillScience23/05/26 05:57 AM
23

The dimorphism is what's key here. It's Bateman's principle in action. It also shows that appearance matters more for men.
/r/BlackPillScience16/03/26 06:44 AM
7

r/titlegore
/r/BlackPillScience09/03/26 03:41 AM
150

<image> It's literally this meme. Attractive guys get away with unsavory behavior more often.
/r/BlackPillScience14/02/26 02:21 PM
28

Money may matter, but not nearly as much as looks. That's why you dont see teen girls swooning over posters of Bill Gates.
/r/BlackPillScience05/01/26 10:29 AM
5

We are a dual-strategy species. Monogamy is primary and polygamy comes in the form of infidelity and skews in the operational sex ratio, where an excess of women meant that they would have no husband if some men didn't take an extra wife. However, as agriculture and other technologies developed, men gained the ability to support multiple wives and many more children. Thus, in some cultures, polygyny became the norm. However, societies which stuck to monogamy tended to outperform polygynous socie…
/r/BlackPillScience01/01/26 08:57 PM
6

I didn't say humans were exclusively monogamous. Obviously, we aren't. I meant that we are primarily so.
/r/BlackPillScience01/01/26 12:02 PM
24

Keep in mind that the vast majority of mammals are polygamous, meaning 80% might never sire any offspring at all. When you average things out, this creates a pretty massive skew. Humans are very clearly not polygamous to the same extent that other apes are. In fact, it is quite clear that we are monogamous as made apparent by: Reduced dimorphism in body size Reduced dimorphism in cuspid size Reduced dimorphism in craniofacial structure, Human males have a more gracile appearance. Reduced testicu…
/r/BlackPillScience01/01/26 05:26 AM
1

Dating women instead of men
/r/BlackPillScience22/09/25 02:41 AM
1

I'm not sure I understand what you're arguing. How exactly is that a cope? I literally discuss species going extinct from sexual selection butting up against natural selection in my other comments. "Evolutionarily beneficial" is defined as something that increases one's fecundity relative to other members of your species. So yes, even if you it shortens your lifespan, being able to reproduce with many more females as a result of being attractive is evolutionarily beneficial.
/r/BlackPillScience19/09/25 06:15 AM
5

Ain't that the darn truth. Idiocracy was right all along.
/r/BlackPillScience18/09/25 06:10 PM
5

Obviously, if death is an obstruction to fecundity, then it's not evolutionarily beneficial. However, that isn't always the case. For example, a mother sacrificing herself to a predator to save her offspring. She kills herself, but does so to ensure the propagation of her genes. In many highly ornamented birds such as the pheasant family or birds of paradise, it's quite clear that the ornamentation is an obstruction to survival. The peacock's tail is a massive beacon to predators and is highly e…
/r/BlackPillScience18/09/25 05:31 PM
11

If something makes you attractive, then it's evolutionarily beneficial, even if it hurts your survival.
/r/BlackPillScience18/09/25 02:32 PM
15

How do they define staring?
/r/BlackPillScience24/08/25 04:32 AM
2

So you're saying women like men for their personalities? Blue pilled.
/r/BlackPillScience31/07/25 08:49 AM
4

and if gay men aren't illegal or shunned they can compete with woman making the dating pool bigger. leading to competition. That doesn't matter if women remove themselves from the dating pool at higher rates than men do, and that is exactly what we would expect if homosexuality is tolerated.
/r/BlackPillScience30/07/25 05:27 AM
15

To conclude that women are more attracted to women than men creates a bit of an evolutionary conundrum. It also brings into question why it is that in societies where homosexuality is more tolerated that the majority of women are still functionally heterosexual.
/r/BlackPillScience29/07/25 08:46 AM
49

In women, it indicates a higher probability of STDs and cuckoldry. In men, it indicates that any sons he has will be successful with women.
/r/BlackPillScience25/06/25 02:38 PM
18

The other problem is using "self-described" as the measure of an incel. Many do not want to associate with the label due to stigma.
/r/BlackPillScience09/06/25 07:55 AM
7

Source: Trust me, bro
/r/BlackPillScience10/05/25 02:52 PM
49

I suspect that they're imagining the guy pulling them into the bushes to be 6'3 with a big chin and a 6-pack, as opposed to a 5'4 balding Indian janitor. It makes sense, since we see women put up with abuse from handsome men all the time.
/r/BlackPillScience09/05/25 03:55 PM
2

Height by itself isn't inherently a good measure of dysgenics vs eugenics, at least in the context byw which we are discussing it. In fact, the model I have presented actually predicts that males will become larger and more muscular due to sexual selection, just as gorillas are significantly larger and more muscular than their female counterparts. Society doesn't function because men are tall, it functions because men are civil and productive.
/r/BlackPillScience24/04/25 10:06 PM
4

It doesn't matter if the traits are associated with each other. Those traits aren't the ones being selected for. When you look at polygamous species, males typically contribute less to the rearing of offspring and tend to be highly aggressive and territorial. Also, the fact that intelligence isn't significantly dimorphic indicates that it hasn't been something that women have historically selected for. I suspect that humans are not the exemption to the rules and we will begin to see similar patt…
/r/BlackPillScience24/04/25 09:13 PM
15

You just explained exactly why dating apps are dysgenic. Women aren't selecting the most intelligent, hard-working, industrious men on dating apps, are they? Women are dating men based almost entirely on how they look. This means that they are selecting men to be more attractive, even at the expense of other qualities. It's the same thing as what we see in the peacock. The peacock's big beautiful tail is encumbering which makes it much harder to run or fly, and acts as a massive beacon to predat…
/r/BlackPillScience24/04/25 08:14 PM
6

How so? I'd argue that dating apps are a major source of dysgenics.
/r/BlackPillScience24/04/25 07:38 PM
6

I don't understand what you mean.
/r/BlackPillScience24/04/25 03:21 PM
14

Governments need to regulate dating apps fast. The younger generations are dying from all this hypergamy. You want to stop crashing birth rates? This is a good place to start.
/r/BlackPillScience24/04/25 07:07 AM
15

Attractiveness does not equal adeptness to environment. Sexual and natural selection are orthogonal mechanisms.
/r/BlackPillScience11/03/25 07:09 AM
1

I wonder if that has to do with the skewing of operational sex ratio resulting from WW2.
/r/BlackPillScience29/01/25 11:22 PM
6

If your wife cheats on you with a man, there's a risk of cuckoldry and STDs, not to mention she's not emotionally invested in you. If she cheats with another woman, it sucks that she may have less emotional investment, but there's no risk of cuckoldry and minimal risk of STDs, so it's not as big of a deal. IDK if I buy into the whole "extra mating opportunity" hypothesis.
/r/BlackPillScience15/01/25 07:12 AM
5

Vectors of disease are typically frowned upon by most cultures.
/r/BlackPillScience15/01/25 07:08 AM
26

It doesn't take a huge selective advantage for one Y-lineage to outbreed all the others. A small bit of cuckoldry on the side of one's own family over a few thousand years will do it.
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/24 06:04 AM
5

Will do
/r/BlackPillScience14/07/24 10:39 PM
10

According to the methods section, this is one of those studies where the participants looked at photographs of potential mates which had personality descriptions next to them. The problem with these sorts of studies is that they fail to observe the actual choices that people make when it comes to relationships. This is what people say their behaviors are as opposed to what their behaviors actually are.
/r/BlackPillScience11/07/24 04:30 PM
20

An evolutionary constraint preventing excessive dimorphism. Technology has overcome it. This is a feedback loop that will result in a death spiral.
/r/BlackPillScience22/06/24 03:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter