TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Gallifreyan_Type_40 Archive

View 1 posts and 86 comments by Gallifreyan_Type_40 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
245

Gallifreyan_Type_40/r/MensRights18/02/13 06:57 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Not the OP but I thought I'd give my 2¢. Abortion is constantly under attack from the right wing. They have closed all but a handful of abortion clinics in some states, intentionally making it difficult to get to a clinic. They keep trying to make the window of legal abortion smaller and smaller. They keep trying to defund organizations like Planned Parenthood because they provide abortion services. Right wing politicians run on vocally anti-choice platforms. Birth control is an issue that's a l…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 08:11 AM
57

Damn. The family is able to be in the shelter now, but only because the son is no longer with them because he is now in a mental facility after he felt it was his fault his family was on the streets, and had a breakdown.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 02:29 PM
23

"Meal Provided" That exactly how to lure in young people, they know what they're doing, haha.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 07:41 PM
2

What an immature author. I agree with the sentiment but that article is very poorly written.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 11:19 AM
14

I agree in part. Yes, this is just an advertising technique to appeal to the target audience. Nobody should be offended by it, it's just poking gentle fun. But it aggravates me that if a store were to reverse the genders, they'd be heavily criticized, and probably boycotted. That's where I see a problem with these sort of things.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 07:05 PM
3

I would say that the media has much more of an impact on turning people into sexual objects and creating unrealistic expectations than porn. We know the porn world is not the real world, but advertisements with photoshopped people or all the TV shows with only attractive characters are presented to us as if they are the "real world" so we don't differentiate them as we do porn. If that's what you're saying, I'd agree on that front.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 06:03 PM
5

Adolescents seem very capable at controlling their own porn consumption. They know how to separate porn from real life relationships... Then learn to control your porn consumption like most adolescent boys can.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 05:49 PM
4

I think it most certainly addresses points 2 and 3 when it says Adolescents seem very capable at controlling their own porn consumption. They know how to separate porn from real life relationships, and have normal old fashioned behavior. Most acquire Porn competency, know how to watch and interpret porn. They know the porn world is separate from the real world.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 05:47 PM
-5

The /r/lgbt mod's stance on mr issues is well known, there was no reason to send these messages other than to stir the pot.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:57 PM
-1

Let's be honest, you knew they would react this way, the only reason you messaged them was to spark controversy. This is the kind of petty shit mr could do without.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:53 PM
-1

Because the comment doesn't contribute to the discussion.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 09:53 PM
5

Then it's whoever's darker.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 02:02 AM
33

I'm a gay man and I feel very included in this movement. Stuff about gay men's problems get posted here sometimes and they are met with the same outflow of support as those about straight men.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:52 AM
0

The only reason I just said I disapprove is because you accused me of not thinking for myself.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 01:10 AM
0

I am speaking of my own accord. I visit the sub regularly and do not like more than half of what I see.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 11:05 PM
2

I never said they don't have the right to say it. I said MR as a group would be wise to denounce what they say.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 08:27 PM
2

Compared to the other TRP posts, this is the troll one. The responses to those threads were the correct ones. TRP is a sub enforcing traditional gender roles (even saying that is sugar-coating what happens in that sub) and we as MRAs are against that. That sub has some very misogynist undertones as well. Denouncing them is the correct response, and all this thread is doing is bringing out the minority of MR subscribers that agree with the questionable material in that sub.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 05:35 PM
9

There are a lot of measures against discrimination in the research field. For example, when you cite other researchers or yourself, you have to to cite with the first initial of your first name and full last name (Example: F. Last; J. Doe; J. Smith). This is required specifically to avoid gender discrimination in review boards. If women are being cited less often, it's probably because there are simply less female researchers.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:13 PM
-5

It has also successfully hijacked the LGBT movement.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:57 PM
15

Well, they care plenty when it's men raping other men.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 01:06 AM
11

ADD/ADHD is a legitimate medical condition that is over diagnosed. I don't mean to be rude, but don't dismiss a valid medical condition just because your personal anecdote happens to align with your ignorance.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:31 PM
38

Because it's a cosmetic surgery with no benefits performed on a minor unable to consent. If you want to get a circumcision as an adult for whatever reason, go right ahead, it's your body. But nobody should be able to make that decision for you, especially as a child.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:55 PM
6

Hold up a second, is this a fact or a "fact" that floats around tumblr and facebook? Because those are two totally different things.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:49 AM
13

Everything I've ever read about vasectomies has said to consider them permanent, because they are difficult to reverse and you are not guaranteed to be fertile afterwards
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:45 AM
15

Perhaps because they're more certain in their desire to die, compared to many women who may see suicide attempts as a way to gain sympathy. I'm currently studying Psychology, and one of my textbooks on Developmental Psychology said, according to suicide survivors, it's more like the following: Women want to leave a cleaner corpse (for which poison is the best option), and men want to die quickly/instantly (for which guns, hanging, etc. are best). Unfortunately, men wanting to die quickly leads t…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 06:12 AM
1

I think this is a good way to handle it. Giving kids this kind of powerful medication to a developing mind is pretty dangerous because their brain is constantly changing, so any mental medications aren't going have the same effects for very long. Doctors know this too, that's why kids on these drugs have to get checkups all the time to make sure they're getting the "right" dosage. In my opinion, these kids really shouldn't be getting any medication until around 18. I know a couple of adults that…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 06:14 PM
10

Do these people really think that men do not understand the concept of consent? "What's that? I can't just grab a woman off the side of the street and fuck her? Oh man! I wish someone would have told me about this earlier!"
/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:51 AM
2

Then why isn't it okay to have different rates for different races? It's no different.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 04:49 PM
4

For example, the "modern men are all overgrown children, man up and get married" mantra that we have been seeing for years already.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:47 PM
-7

Sex and Gender are two different things, and I think most people in this sub would agree that there are concepts of gender that have been created by society. Examples: Men have short hair, women have long hair. Men go to war, Women raise children. Men are muscular, Women are dainty. Men should be hairy, Women should be hairless. Etc. These are all constructed by society and change over the years.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:39 PM
4

We already have Men's Studies, it's called HIStory for a reason, you rape apologist! /s edit: 'twas a joke, y'all D:
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:35 PM
30

If you can become a registered sex offender for peeing on the side of the road, this should defiantly get you on the list.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 09:07 PM
36

Well, Negative Nancy, it's something positive in an otherwise depressing sub.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 08:42 PM
31

It's ironic that the perpetrators were wearing little black dresses, considering last week was "My Little Black Dress Does Not Mean Yes" campaign week on many college campuses.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 04:42 PM
1

I always found myself very excited when I found I would be having a male teacher the next semester.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:21 PM
6

It's a term that Native Americans use. It's somewhat like Transgender or Gender-fluid.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:32 AM
2

This sub is quickly becoming nothing but a social-conservative circlejerk.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 06:40 PM
9

Within the family, I was beat 3 times, and I will never, ever lay my hands on a child like that in my life. It's disgusting and really says something about you if you have no qualms about it. Within the family I was more neglected than anything else. But at school I was among the lowest of the low. Didn't use the bathrooms because if I went in them I'd be beat to shit, PE was hell, ate my lunch in a separate room because if I ate in the cafeteria someone would steal my food, and I went either to…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:45 PM
233

Aw man, it started out so gender-neutral too...it's like they thought "ohshit! I forgot victimize the women!"
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:02 PM
7

That's how I saw it. They're simply saying that, legally, if you've had alcohol you can't consent, so watch yourself. And they said that in a gender neutral manner, for which I applaud them. Most organizations would label the 'rapist' as a male and the victim as a female without second thought.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:47 PM
17

This isn't a place for novelty.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:07 PM
16

As long as they have to pass the same physical and mental requirements as men, I see no problem.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:16 PM
2

Well said, I have been noticing the trend as well.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:00 AM
3

There are! My boyfriend got one! It's blue and the heart is upside down so it resembles balls, haha.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:05 PM
0

Stop turning this subreddit into a voting brigade.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:50 PM
16

Can we also stop linking to threads in other subreddits that we approve or disapprove of? It turns this subreddit into a voting brigade.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:53 PM
-11

Stop turning this subreddit into a voting brigade.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:36 PM
6

Now you're just being absurd.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 11:51 PM
3

I'm an avid subscriber to MR, and I hope others can see that you're right about the post Knight_of_Malta was responding to. In my eyes, his post was all amazing content, but he was trying to piggy-back off a tangentially related post (and a hateful one at that), probably because, at the time, it was rising quickly. "We're [referring to men] the ones making the money, and have the possessions" "Maybe then women will wake up and figure out that we will not cater to irrational, and illogical behavi…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 11:13 PM
7

She was pretty well liked, haha.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:35 AM
29

Wow, this is crazily similar to an experience I had in 6th grade. Our Music class teacher was blatantly giving better grades to the girls in the class. She let the girls get away with talking and snickering, and yelled at any guys. She did not allow guys bathroom breaks, but let all the girls in the class have a 5 minute break. When the end of the semester came around, not one guy had a grade better than a C, and nearly every girl ha dan A. We also made a petition, but she confiscated it when we…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:05 AM
6

Go pick up your child from elementary school as a male, you'll see just how much of a "safe space" it is.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:08 PM
2

PLEASE, use this center to educate men about their own bodies. Encourage them to get to a doctor when they think something is off. So many men, especially young men, develop medical problems and don't do anything about it because they either don't understand their own bodies, don't know how/where to get help, or think they're overreacting ("man flu" etc.). Put up some posters letting the men on campus know that the center caters to men's problems, and can educate them on their own bodies.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 01:51 AM
-5

Usually this guy is such an asshole that it invalidates everything he says, but this time he was mostly just passionate, and I wish he would speak like this more often.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:54 PM
2

women Feminists* I know we've got supportive ladies in this sub too. :D
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:03 PM
155

I don't really care, until you are a woman, your opinion is invalid. This is how they actually think.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:23 PM
1

I didn't read the article, but IMO, this kind of thinking is generally bad for the movement. This is basically says there is some unseen force oppressing men, just like Feminists say Patriarchary does to women. We don't need to make up shit like they do to get a point across, we have thousands of observable cases of oppression plus statistics and legitimate sources. Don't stoop to their level.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:01 PM
5

Ahhhhh. Reading that thread now, and honestly, it's fucking hilarious. That kind of funny that's like "You're so fucking nuts it's comical."
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:22 AM
81

One day people that bash our movement will recoil in horror as they realize all they did was further legitimize how much it is needed. EDIT: Why is this getting downvoted so much? If it's members of this sub, would you care to say why?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 12:17 AM
32

Of course not! It's obviously sexist against women because it is the man-centered government forcing women into lower paying jobs while encouraging men to take full-time ones! PATRIARCHY! /s
/r/MensRights09/09/12 11:20 PM
17

But still, if the genders were reversed, you better believe the man would be on the sex offender list, in jail for years to come, and the word "rape" would be plastered all over that article.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 06:18 PM
20

It's great that you're comfortable with your penis, every guy should be, circumcised or not. And I'm glad to hear you wouldnt circumcise your child. But the reason we talk about it so much is because there are still so many people that will have their child circumcised because they are ignorant of the facts. We talk about it because we don't think it should be allowed at birth or any time during childhood unless it is medically nessicary, because when it is done for cosmetic purposes, it is muti…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:57 AM
11

You know what I meant.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 09:15 PM
29

It's so stupid when men are expected to give up their seat just because a girl walks in; it is a perfect example of male disposability. But that is assuming the woman is not elderly, disabled, or pregnant (same goes for a man). If they are any of those, then they should be offered a seat (but not just be the men on the bus, by anyone). The only time I've given up my seat to a woman of the same age and ability as me is when she was too short to comfortably hold the rails above her.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 07:18 PM
2

Well, for one we talked about gender roles as they relate to sexuality, and we talked about how women are much more likely to slut shame their fellow women than men are. Many feminists in the class got pissed with this idea, even though it was well sourced within our textbook. When I talk about the "College Feminist" this is what I think of: I think of the girl who had literally no concept of gender roles or gender incongruity until they came to college and were lured in by Feminist professors. …
/r/MensRights21/07/12 04:17 AM
1

We have one masculinities class titled "The making of 'Real Men', Masculinities in the United States", and it is a WGS class.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 04:54 PM
1

Firstly, there is evidence for both sides of the debate, but there is much much more evidence for the biological differences side. Basically, gender roles don't have to have biological backing, but they almost always do. As for the idea being taken seriously, it honestly depends on the professor. If you've got a feminist, you'd better believe they'll be teaching that there are no biological differences. Feminists are usually the only ones that will teach that though. But as I said, there are a l…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:07 AM
5

I'm pursuing a Bachelors degree in Psychology (hoping to go on to get a degree in Neuropsychology), so I'm sure you know how saturated by feminists this field is. One of my classes last semester was a very peasant surprise though. I had a male professor, which is becoming rarer and rarer in this field. He was certainly no MRA, but he was completely neutral and I loved it. He talked about issues he knew Feminists would be angry about, and talked about them with total neutrality. The craziest thin…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 05:38 AM
5

Firstly, that link is expired because it was hosted on 4chan. Secondly, why the fuck are you linking to 4chan? It's shit like this guys.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 02:20 AM
2

You won't get prosecuted, but if you plan on going to college you will not be able to get any sort of financial assistance, whether it be loans (the Sally May kind from the government), grants or scholarships. I think you can still get loans from a bank.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:46 PM
-3

I agree with you, telling people they should be mad because their penis is defective will not help, it just makes them mad and they become defensive. But part of the problem is that the anti-circumcision campaign is mostly headed by intact men, and many circumcised men are completely complacent with their circumcisions and the circumcisions of others, at times even defending it; telling circumcised men the harsh reality that their penis is defective seems to be the only route to get them to care…
/r/MensRights26/06/12 08:00 PM
55

Wow, what the hell, mastrubation is an unhealthy addiction huh? What is this the fucking 50's?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:16 AM
26

Additionally, he brought up this caparison because a lot of feminists think there is no male equivalent to slut shaming and that men never experience any ridicule based on their gender. They claim there is no slut analogue for men, hence creating a double standard. (right after the "feminazis" and "white knights" comment)
/r/MensRights12/06/12 01:26 AM
3

There's also the physical aspect of it. In most instances, if she is quick enough about it, a woman can get physical evidence of rape via a rape kit. If a man is raped by being forced to penetrate, there is little if anything that can be done to prove that his penetration was not consensual, especially if there are no defense wounds on the rest of his body. A woman can still get evidence even if she has no defense wounds. In some cases it may even look like the attacking woman was the one being …
/r/MensRights10/06/12 05:15 AM
2

Then what is the purpose of having your child circumcised if they have no problems? People say its cleaner, but you don't chop your ears off because you forget to wash behind them. People say it's to prevent these problems, but you don't know if your child will have these problems, that's like amputating your arm because you might break your wrist in the future. If your child has these problems, they can be fixed when they arise (often times without having to resort to full-blown circumcision), …
/r/MensRights04/06/12 01:56 AM
5

The type of female circumcision you are speaking of is completely different than male infant circumcision. What you're talking about is removing a flap of skin to give easier access. That flap of skin is no different than any other. However, male infant circumcision attmepts to remove all of the foreskin, which is not just a flap of skin; it has thousands upon thousands of nerve endings that enhance sex and make the male sexual organ very sensitive. Removing it will completely change how a male …
/r/MensRights04/06/12 01:38 AM
6

We actually talked about this very thing in my Social Psychology class! We came up to the topic of gender roles, and talked about how historically women have used sex as a resource. For example, women withholding sex to get what they want, etc. Then we talked about how women prescribe gender roles to other women more often than men do because women want to protect this resource. So one women having lots of sex is a danger to the rest of the "pack" (for lack of a better word) because it devalues …
/r/MensRights18/05/12 06:07 PM
14

Thank you, I was completely missing the analogy (seriously).
/r/MensRights02/05/12 01:09 AM
2

Then all I can say to your argument is people who force one side on their children under the guise of gender neutrality are doing it wrong and they're bad people.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 10:01 PM
2

And I'm saying that is not gender neutrality, that's wrong. Gender neutrality is taking your kid to the toy store and letting them get whatever they want, whether it be a barbie or a nerf gun. Gender neutrality isn't forcing your kid to see the other side, as your example shows, it's allowing them to explore the other side if they want to. For example, my aunt and uncle raised her twin boys gender neutral. One boy didn't ever dip into the feminine side, (except maybe stuffed animals, but every k…
/r/MensRights09/04/12 09:54 PM
2

I'm not going to argue that there aren't parents that push their children to the feminine side; there are, and that's very wrong of them. But that is not raising a child "Gender Neutral." Gender Neutrality doesn't push children towards either side, the kids choose it themselves. I think what happens is people only see the aspects of the feminine in boys or the masculine in girls because it's "abnormal." They only notice that this little boy enjoys painting or clothes or dancing, but they don't n…
/r/MensRights09/04/12 09:35 PM
4

I think you guys are being a bit severe here. I agree that not referring to the children as he or she is going too far, but the overall idea of not enforcing gender stereotypes in their schools is a good thing. Allowing the children to do as they please when it comes to playing with certain toys or having pink or blue or purple or whatever colored things is a good idea. The children are not forced into a gender stereotype and it allows them to be more open to different things, develop different …
/r/MensRights09/04/12 06:05 PM
1

"I wonder how gay men feel about women using their identity to 'belittle' straight men?" It's defiantly not cool, because it furthers the idea that there is something inherently wrong with being gay.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:26 AM
3

To the fucking top please, everyone is missing this.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:55 PM
3

Right at the bottom, in the red box, it says "Don't be that guy." so yes, it does.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:55 PM
2

I agree, and I'm also very anti-circumcision. A PSA/sexual health presentation aimed towards teens is no place to go on an anti-circumcision rant. Firstly, it will make already very self-conscious teen males even more self-conscious; secondly, it will make uncircumcised teen males think they're "better" then their circumcised peers; and thirdly, it will make female teens think it's okay to be disgusted by a circumcised penis.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter