TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GamerLioness Archive

View 0 posts and 143 comments by GamerLioness on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-9

it's entirely foreseeable that there is going to be staring and inappropriate comments. That doesn't make it acceptable. Once again, it's possible to openly admire someone without making them feel uncomfortable. There's a difference between saying "That's a sexy costume!" and "I would like to touch your thick, sexy ass in that spandex!" Also, it's possible to get harassed in any costume, sexy or not. Just because it's a convention doesn't mean it doesn't uphold the same basic rules of society, s…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 11:08 PM
3

I'm being a completely reasonable person here (well, at least I'm trying to be, anyway). I'm not blaming anybody, and I'm being pretty neutral about everything. I've even been avoiding gendered terms, but I'm still getting accused of "blaming men," even when I use non-gendered terms like "people." I have not attacked MRAs nor men, but I am still being attacked for posting here. I thought MR were forbidden from posting in SRS or whatever. I hang around r/MR sometimes out of curiosity, and if I st…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:58 PM
-4

You're a feminist. By merit of being a feminist, this is what you believe. Ooh, straw-feminism! Nice assumption. Seriously, feminism is not a monolith. Many of us share different beliefs. We're not all Andrea Dworkin. You don't need to apply your conspiracy theories to everything. Sometimes, some people will happen to have different ideologies while simultaneously holding beliefs that don't 100% conflict with yours. Imagine that! The world isn't black and white! Wow!
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:53 PM
-5

It's arguably true that girls and women are the focus since they cosplay the most, but it's not outright denying that boys and men can't get harassed. In fact, the article people are complaining about mentions this. If people were discussing an issue that primarily effects men, I wouldn't take it to heart if the focus wasn't on women (as long as it didn't actively deny that it can effect women, which isn't something I see often). Feminists are doing their usual parasite trick, which is to latch …
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:50 PM
0

I never said that boys and men don't get harassed. Admittedly, my focus was on girls and women in that post, but my others didn't do this. The reason I mentioned girls and women was because I was responding to the accusation that feminists/women are complaining about something that isn't an issue. I can (and did) point this out without denying that boys and men can get harassed. In fact, the article about cosplay not being consent mentions this.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:44 PM
3

I never presented it as male-only. In fact, I've been avoiding gendered terms by saying things like "people" and not "men" or "women."
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:43 PM
-2

I never said that male characters are well-developed. Even though my focus in this discussion is currently on female characters, it's possible for me to care about more than one type of character. Female characters are becoming more common and better designed, but even so, some people will make excuses for why female characters should be relegated to the "secondary character" or "girlfriend" role. See the "Remember Me" and "The Last of Us" controversies. Some publishers still think that gamers d…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:41 PM
7

I reread the article and saw this: "It’s not just women who endure this harassment. Last week, at my Cosplay in the Media panel at MTAC, I had several guys chime in about their own experiences with women touching them inappropriately or making lewd comments to them. Just because this happens to women doesn’t give us the license to treat guys in this manner. One guy shared his story about how women would come up and grab his nether regions while dressed as a particular character. He told us how i…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:35 PM
23

At conventions, most women don't mind things like compliments, as long as they're not rude or make them uncomfortable. Also, only women are subject to unwanted touching? Please tell me when I implied that.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:33 PM
10

Most people don't mind getting photographed. The majority find it flattering. Except when women do it to other women, or do it to men.... or try and get to male characters to kiss via Yaoi flash mobs... It's only creepy when men do it. I never implied that. I literally avoided gendered terms, but you're still automatically assuming that I think only men can harass others.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:31 PM
11

As usual, you are pulling the feminist bullshit and seeing it as women being harassed, and men doing the harassing. Not a gendered issue here. Er, when did I even imply that men were doing the harassing? I said, "it seems like it's saying that people shouldn't be saying nasty things to others." You have nothing useful to contribute to the community at large. And being defensive and rude is "contributing" to the community? I'm entitled to my opinion, even if it conflicts with yours.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:29 PM
-2

Wow, real mature. Can't handle a conversation with someone who doesn't agree with everything you say? While I'm sure there are men who get harassed at cons, that doesn't negate the fact that women also get harassed. No one deserves to be talked down to or treated like shit. Bull shit again. Your lot are the ones trying to get the rules changed at cons, and setting them up as "safe spaces" which is feminist codeword "places you control" How is "don't touch people without consent" an unreasonable …
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:26 PM
-3

Funny. I never claimed to "speak" for the industry. I'm just saying that I'm a a part of it. Thanks for misinterpreting my post.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:21 PM
1

they are also the last bastion of maleness. Femenist's don't play games (i mean core games, not farmville tripe) and neither do women for the most part. r/GirlGamers and the many, many other female gaming communities on Reddit and elsewhere prove your ignorant statement wrong. Video games are not a "bastion of maleness." Men don't own the gaming community, nor do they own cars, sports, or anything else typically associated with men. People can partake in whatever they want. It's society that gen…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:17 PM
-18

"During a press event, featuring several Lara Croft costumers, a journalist began asking some lewd questions of the ladies." That's "male-shaming?" To me, it seems like it's saying that people shouldn't be saying nasty things to others. You can respectfully show appreciation for someone's costume without being a creepy asshole. bitched about a bunch of socially awkward people, acting like socially awkward people. You seem to be implying that being "socially awkward" should give someone a free pa…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:12 PM
42

Exactly. I'm irked that a lot of the people here don't seem to understand the fact that women don't have a problem with the looking but with the touching and inappropriate comments.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:07 PM
5

Getting photographed isn't the issue. I've never seen or heard anyone say that. Getting touched without giving consent, however, is creepy.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:06 PM
13

Some people go beyond "ogling." Some of them will say rude, nasty things or even touch women without asking. Appreciating sexiness is not the same as being a total creepy asshole.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:05 PM
12

You're completely misinterpreting the issue. It's one thing to find someone "sexy." It's another thing to treat them like subhuman beings for dressing up like a sexy character. You don't get to, for example, touch someone's ass or grab them to take a photo without asking first. Also, a lot of people don't like the portrayal of women in comics and games, including men. Why do you think so many men play as the awesome, not overly-sexualized FemShep in Mass Effect?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:04 PM
-11

I'm a woman and a feminist. I'm also a game designer. I can assure you that we're not "trying to take over" anything. The so-called "gaming/nerdy community" doesn't "own" anything. It's possible to share interests with someone without sharing the same ideology. You can find examples of feminists who partake in "geek culture" on sites like Fat, Ugly or Slutty and The Mary Sue. Girls and women actually do get harassed in costume. Some people actually think it's okay to catcall and even touch these…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:00 PM
2

Feminists would need to call these people out and disassociate themselves from them and their ideas, not just show people that not all feminists are that way. And I'm not talking about OP or his sister, I'm talking about things in general. Fair enough. Fortunately, radical feminists are fairly rare. It'd be great to force that handful of people out of the mainstream movement and give them a different name and identity, but there are extremists in every movement that are difficult to expunge. Car…
/r/MensRights24/03/13 06:09 AM
2

I'm glad that you acknowledge that there are regular feminists. Radical "feminazis" are perfectly welcome in the feminist community, and when someone points them out they're always met with the "not all feminists are like that" crap. Er, no. I don't like being associated with radicals, and neither do most feminists. We try to differentiate ourselves from them by going out of our way to show that we aren't "man-haters." Even the OP's "radical" feminist sister said she agreed that men have importa…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 01:47 AM
3

Okay, I read the OP's "edit" and realized that maybe he's not being as pushy as I initially thought he was. However, I don't see how she's "badmouthing his gender" when she freely says that she would never deny that men deal with issues, too (even the OP mentions this). Anyway, the comments here are actually the worst part. And what exactly are straw-feminists? Last I checked most people attacked real feminists for their comments. Straw-feminists are an exaggeration of actual feminists. For exam…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 01:27 AM
3

Feminism has many characteristics of a religion, and feminists demonstrate a faith-based belief in it. Rather than a reasoned conclusion based on facts. When you say shit like that, don't be surprised when people don't bother listening to you. Also, I've seen plenty of radical MRAs say some very cult-like, emotionally-driven stuff about women. That doesn't mean I make assumptions about every single MRA in existence.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 10:12 PM
3

for 50 years or so they were completely unchallenged Yeah, that must be why there have been so many straw-feminists being used as examples of why all feminists are "evil." That must be why we've had terms like "feminazi" being used for even the least vocal of feminists. I honestly think you should keep challenging her. It's one thing to "challenge" her. It's another thing to be completely disrespectful. The irony here is just astounding.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 10:07 PM
1

For men, this is not so easy because being male you have no inherent value. Either you're able to provide and protect, or you're cast aside like an old rag along a dirty country road. Being a woman meant a certain amount of security, because you could always find a place where you were in demand, simply by virtue of being a woman and nothing else. For men, this is not so. If you're looking at it that way, it would be equally fair to say that women have no inherent value unless they're able to pr…
/r/MensRights10/03/13 04:30 PM
4

If a guy gets called a faggot or a nigger or has someone describe a sexual encounter with their mother...in eerie detail... he just rolls his eyes and moves on. But "get back in the kitchen" and "show me your tits" are over the line? You can't be serious. Allow me to share my insight. I'm a woman, a gamer, and a game designer. I know that trash-talking goes on in many online communities. However, in my opinion, there's a difference between calling a person of unknown sexuality or race a "faggot"…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:25 PM
1

Now you are just going back on your own words. No, you're misinterpreting what I'm trying to say. I said that women's victimization / suffering is seen as worse than men's by society, pointing out the Egyptian protests as an example. You then disagreed, saying I think that's because the attack on the Egyptian woman was gendered violence. But in fact, it was not gendered violence, and had nothing to do with her gender. The fact that you automatically said it was gendered violence is both incorrec…
/r/MensRights07/08/12 09:05 AM
1

Granting those rights to women lead to it's self destruction via depopulation. I'm still not convinced. You don't get to cherry-pick from an article and twist it to support such a major claim. Hell, for all you know, Sparta could have been worse off. We'll never know. Either way, once again, your source disagrees with your main thesis. I will give the quote again: "Because Aristotle blamed Spartan women for Sparta’s downfall, the Spartan policy of giving rights to women was, in his view, a mista…
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:49 AM
5

Exactly! Most of us feminists just want choices. A woman has a right to be a doctor or a housewife, and a man has a right to be a nurse or a househusband. Choices for all!
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:46 AM
2

women who want to be traditional, ie, raise kids, cook food, bake sales, all that jazz, they get hazings from feminists who want to force them to be more manly. Not really. Some (usually radicals) might, but the general consensus is "Give people choices." I, and many others, disagree with those small handful of feminists who haze women for being housewives.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:44 AM
3

Greece: Read this [PDF]. Giving women too much control ran Sparta into the ground. Do you even read your own sources? The very source you provided states the opposite of your so-called argument: "Because Aristotle blamed Spartan women for Sparta’s downfall, the Spartan policy of giving rights to women was, in his view, a mistake. Our analysis suggests otherwise. Quite simply, without its full-time military, Sparta could not have held Messenia, and without granting rights to women, Spartan men co…
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:36 AM
2

This is why you are not made welcome here. Because of shit like this. Feminists like yourself try to pretend that everything that happens to a woman is gendered (it isn't), and that because it is gendered, it is worse than what happens to men. That was not my point at all. Don't misinterpret what I'm saying. I'm saying that gendered violence against women is common in many countries. What I mean by "gendered violence" is that they are targeted specifically for being female. It's a hate crime in …
/r/MensRights06/08/12 03:19 AM
4

That's why you see "20 dead, including three women " etc. I don't recall seeing any headline phrased like that. I usually see something like "17 men and 3 women killed." That's why the media hyped up some random Egyptian woman (blue bra woman) getting thrown to the ground, ignoring the hundreds of men getting beaten badly. I think that's because the attack on the Egyptian woman was gendered violence. It's the same reason we say "LGBT person attacked" if it's violence against LGBT people, "Africa…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:35 AM
7

And I'm done. Beyond the fact that you ignore what I say, the fact you think women's issues are even in the same ballpark as men's issues, and to think that to think "my poor body image" is less important than "I'm am discriminated against by government" is a sign of misogyny... I never ignored you. I just said that men and women deal with separate issues. Again, what I said was, "[F]or you to suggest that women's issues don't matter as much as men's issues is misogynistic. ... Maybe the issues …
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:25 AM
4

Something can't be sexist if it's true. So for example, when DS says that women's victimization is seen as more tragic / worse than men's (even if the victimization is identical, e.g. men and women dying in the same event), that is not sexist because it is demonstrably true. I don't see a woman's victimization as being more tragic than a man's if a woman and man die in the same event. This might be the case if the woman was a mother (and, thus, expected to be the primary caregiver), but I often …
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:14 AM
1

Once again, women are expected to be the primary caregivers, which makes it very difficult to balance work and family. Women are way more stressed out, in this regard. This is a huge reason I don't want children. I think mothers and fathers should have equal participation in child-rearing. However, it is the mother that is often expected to sacrifice her career for her family, even in today's society.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 04:50 AM
5

No, they don't. That's what you're not getting. I don't think you will until that inherent value is taken away from women. Once again, we don't have an "inherent value" because of our wombs. If that were the case, we wouldn't have had to fight for our right to vote, to be treated equally in the workplace, to not be portrayed with ridiculous proportions in the media, to not be slut-shamed, to be able to freely take contraception and get abortions, to not be objectified and made to feel like shit …
/r/MensRights05/08/12 04:34 AM
2

Then quit advocating and voting for government to take care of you. When did I say I advocated for that? I think the government should provide some stability, but I never said it should invade people's personal lives. Nice assumptions there, though. Until they drop out of the full time workforce at greater than 50% at 10 years after graduation. Women may be getting jobs, but they're not staying at the jobs. Says who? I have a hard time believing that more than 50% of women are dropping out of th…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 02:19 AM
2

You don't fucking get it, do you? Men don't have inherent worth. Men get worth by what they do, by what they accomplish. If they don't accomplish, society treats them as worthless. Women don't have to put up with that do-or-die mentality because they have wombs. Ha. Not really. It's not like a female baby automatically is deemed "worthy" because she has a womb and will grow up to (possibly) have babies of her own. Women have to make accomplishments, too, and they often do. Regardless of what you…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 02:01 AM
3

Perhaps if women quit insisting that they were weak, inferior, and so easily manipulated that the need so much help from government to put them on "equal footing" with men... perhaps then men will stop seeing them as weak and inferior! Oh, so you're one of those anti-government, anti-"handout" (and probably anti-left wing) people. The original topic wasn't even government, so you must have a lot of pent-up anger about government. Also, we don't think we're weak, inferior, or easily manipulated, …
/r/MensRights05/08/12 01:31 AM
6

So? That doesn't change that they are flat-out wrong. I'm wrong? Do you even realize that a lot of what you're saying is just utterly ridiculous? But it is. If you don't like hearing reality, then don't come to MRA land. I feel bad for the halfway-decent MRAs that have people like you to turn their movement into an anti-woman one. I don't tell men that their inherent worth is in their testicles. I think of people as people first, not "What set of genitals do they have? I must know whether it's t…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 01:19 AM
1

Thankfully, people have been downvoting you for attacking me. I'll reply to you, but I truly hope that you get reported for your nasty little attacks. Are you stupid, or just stupid? Using women to sell products is caring less about women? You're fucking stupid. Right wingers control women's bodies? EVERYONE tries to control men's bodies. Or is the concept of alimony and child support and conscription and other forced service for men foreign to your ability to think? Yes, I believe that using wo…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 10:51 PM
7

You are getting hostility because the stuff you are saying is typical feminist-approved attitudes, which do not hold up to scrutiny. Haha. "Feminist-Approved™." I'm entitled to my beliefs. I'm not a radical feminist. I'm just a regular one who tries to look at things from all sides. I agree with some of what MRAs say, but almost everything that Demonspawn said is just sexist, and he gets upvoted for it. That's why this place has an image problem, especially compared to a place like the feminist-…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 10:13 PM
7

That's why society treats the average woman better than the average man. Really? That must be why we're used to sell products, why we get right-wingers trying to control our bodies, etc. That's why when women die in an accident, people care a lot more than when a man dies. You may feel that way, but that doesn't make it true. That means women will have to start gaining value by doing rather than simply by just being. You mean like the mothers who have kids and work? And the women who don't have …
/r/MensRights04/08/12 04:03 PM
3

The more women demand that right, the more they become men. Women..."become" men by demanding the right to bodily autonomy and their own fertility? If you want to be treated as men... beware, because women just don't measure up to male standards of behavior. "Male standards?" You mean your standards, right? When women lose their inherent value, then they will understand what "equality" truly means, and they will be sad. Women "lose their inherent value" by...deciding when to get pregnant? Also, …
/r/MensRights04/08/12 12:36 AM
-4

so as long as they don't pork out or do something else to dramatically reduce their beauty, they are safe. Gee, that must be why Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan got a lot of hateful comments based on her looks, along with all the insults directed at some of the female Olympic athletes, and so on.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 12:31 AM
0

women have inherent value due to their wombs. And yet we're not inherently valuable enough to have control of when something grows inside of our wombs, according to many people in this country.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 12:25 AM
4

Once again, the definition of "atheism" is simply not believing in a god or gods. Technically, an atheist could believe in dragons or ghosts and still be an atheist. That's all there is to it. Also, you don't have to have "faith" to have opinions. I'm sorry if you've dealt with shitty people who considered themselves feminists, but we're all different people. I don't demand that people "accept patriarchy," but I do know that a lot of cultures were or are considered patriarchal, due to the men in…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 07:54 AM
3

Citation?
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:12 PM
2

One cannot be a feminist without being religious. You're wrong. Absolutely wrong. I'm a feminist, but I'm an atheist, too. How is this possible? Because I don't believe in a god or gods. Atheism is a lack of belief in a god or gods. There you go.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:10 PM
2

I am a feminist. I am also an atheist, because I don't believe in a god or gods. You're just plain wrong.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:10 PM
1

It is an anti-feminist site. It's in the name, for fuck's sake. My angry and rude tones? Look at what you're writing. You sound like the average conspiracy theorist who blames everything on feminism. I'm not arrogant. I'm just demanding examples, which you've failed to give. You're the arrogant one for assuming that I should believe you, even though all you did was link to a site that uses buzzwords like "gynocentric feminism." I'm not "gynocentric," and nor are the vast majority of feminists I …
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:39 PM
1

Feministe is gynocentric, misandric feminism. I'm still waiting for those specific examples. Linking to an anti-feminist site doesn't add to your credibility.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 07:24 PM
1

that site is filled with misandric crap Give some examples. Or did you see the word "feminist" and automatically assume it was "misandric?" Hell, even when it has something you'd agree with, you think there's some sort of conspiracy behind it. Oh, and don't act like you haven't seen your fair share of misogyny in this subreddit and the sites it links to (AVfM, for example).
/r/MensRights19/05/12 09:03 PM
4

It probably has to do with the fact that female deputies are rather uncommon, though I often hear gendered language used in general when speaking about who died. I've heard terms like "teenage boy/girl," "baby boy/girl," "man," "woman," etc. This sort of language seems to be used the majority of the time.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:25 PM
12

Except that feminists actually do discuss women's issues, along with gender issues in general, LGBT issues, etc. Maybe you won't like every single feminist, but the majority of the ones I've seen don't shit on men at every opportunity. As for this place, well, whenever I come here, I see a whole lot of women-bashing. I would be fine with the MRM and MRAs if they actually just discussed men's issues. Instead, they have to complain about feminism and blame it for causing all the issues men deal wi…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:13 PM
0

To be fair, I see a lot of anti-feminist commentary on this subreddit. In fact, the majority of it comes from here. Yet, as negative of an experience as I've had here, I don't think singling out this subreddit was the right thing to do. But I'm just a "feminazi," so what do I know? It's disappointing to come here and see all the hate against feminists. I don't like being labeled as a "man-hater" or "feminazi," just as you don't like being labeled "woman-hater" or whatever. But apparently it's ok…
/r/MensRights14/12/11 02:14 AM
0

That's not what feminism says. I've never heard any feminist say that "all men are rapists" or "rapists can only be men." Can't you be an MRA without resorting to shitting on feminism? Is it that fucking hard of a concept to grasp?
/r/MensRights04/12/11 11:25 PM
0

Apparently, the submissions aren't real. Here's what the site says: "This site isn't completely real. It's a project for Fast Company magazine, designed to address the issue of perspective parents disproportionately wanting a boy. The stats aren't real. The submissions aren't real. But the issue is. So look around. Enjoy yourself. And maybe learn something in the process." Still an odd way to get a point across, though...
/r/MensRights22/11/11 07:24 AM
-10

"This site isn't completely real. It's a project for Fast Company magazine, designed to address the issue of perspective parents disproportionately wanting a boy. The stats aren't real. The submissions aren't real. But the issue is. So look around. Enjoy yourself. And maybe learn something in the process." They might be referring to both mothers and fathers. Then again, the language they use may be kind of vague. It's hard to know if by "parents" they mean "fathers" or "both parents." Even if th…
/r/MensRights22/11/11 07:15 AM
2

Feminists continually blame their gender's failure to do anything important besides making babies on sexism when the fault lies with women themselves. I won't say whether this is biological or laziness or whathave you but the simple fact of the matter is that if all women suddenly disappeared from the earth men would be a little shaken up. Then they would get things back to normal relatively quickly. Yeah, that would totally happen, because we womenfolk are unimportant and a total burden. Excuse…
/r/MensRights30/10/11 05:06 AM
1

Men built this society and continue to keep it running. Without men it would very quickly fall apart. True, but society would also fall apart if women didn't play their part. We're half of the population. Don't pretend like we don't do anything important.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 09:51 AM
1

In nearly all fields of human endeavor men rule. Look at the world around you. It was built by men. Without men we would still be living in caves. I'm so tired of this "argument." You act as if women are troglodytes who couldn't have done anything if men weren't around to "invent everything." Yes, men invented a lot of things, but women have made great things, too, despite the fact that female inventors had to deal with being "out of place" in society. I hate how some people in the MRM attribute…
/r/MensRights29/10/11 09:45 AM
7

Women are nothing more than a fucking incubator. ... I'm a fucking woman and men are worth just as much as me. Yeah, I doubt you're a woman. And if you are, you're a misogynistic one. Seriously, calling women "nothing more than a fucking incubator" is just as bad as saying men are "nothing more than sperm donators."
/r/MensRights29/10/11 09:41 AM
6

Uh, yes, women were oppressed by not having the vote. Don't even try to make such shitty fucking excuses. "I would submit that women’s historical lack of voting rights was neither a good thing nor a bad thing. Rather, it was a morally indifferent state of affairs, based on a cultural consensus that was shared by men and women alike in the past." So because some women-- who were told to believe that they didn't deserve to vote-- supported not letting any woman vote, it was okay to screw over a bi…
/r/MensRights28/10/11 05:22 AM
0

then you never were one of us. So he's "not one of you" anymore because he disagrees with you about this issue and is tired of attacks from the MRM? Great attitude to have about your members.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 05:11 AM
1

She admits to her own sexism but tries to justify it with the fact that it's her first child and whatnot. No, she admitted to her sexism, explained why she had felt the way she did, and recognized that she was wrong about what she thought. You people just aren't content until you ruin a person's life by making her seem like something she's not. That's libel.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 05:07 AM
2

Tell me...how many men who are on the sex offender registry (those who deserve to be there, not people who are there for underage sex between two consenting underaged individuals) would deserve to be taken off with a simple heart-felt apology? Tell me...how many people are on a site meant for false rape accusers, simply for saying things you don't agree with? Yes, her views were sexist, but she's not a fucking criminal.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 05:03 AM
1

I'm not going to sue you. I'm not getting involved. I'm just saying that you're being immature and unethical.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:11 PM
1

I'm no lawyer, but I do know it's unethical to make it so that a Google search of the person's name will make it look like they're a "false rape accuser." Expressing an opinion is one thing, but purposely and blatantly trying to ruin someone's life and potential for getting hired is not an "opinion."
/r/MensRights27/10/11 07:57 PM
1

You do know defamation is illegal, right? If this woman (or any of the others) file a case against you, just know that you were in the wrong.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 07:13 PM
1

I'd say remove it, because she'll appear to be a "false rape accuser" if her name is entered into a Google search. That would fuck her over if, say, a potential employer were doing research before they hired her.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:55 PM
1

These liars call fathers rights an abusers lobby, but we don't stop advocating for fathers rights or allow fathers rights groups to be divided or manipulated because of that. Who calls them that? I've never seen anyone say that. Yes she was, read the whole story, not just the end. Where is the story? On her blog? I didn't see it. Don't tell lies now. The objection was to making up stats, false allegations about pedophilia and bigotry. That might seem trivial to you, but its not to a lot of other…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:52 PM
0

It doesn't matter if you think these women are "bigots" or "misandrists" or whatever; you're ruining their reputations by making it seem like they falsely accused someone of rape, even though they were never even convicted or made such a claim. It would be fine if you were just using the site to do what it was originally meant to do, but this shit has to stop. You can't put women on there just because they disagree with you. Hell, in this case, the woman you're keeping on there eventually agreed…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:37 PM
1

How do you know?
/r/MensRights25/10/11 11:50 PM
0

She was abusing them? As far as I can tell, she apologized and changed her viewpoint, and now she has to potentially have her reputation ruined because she said something you guys didn't agree with. You people on here are being unjust by putting her on a site meant for rape accusers, even after she recanted. When did she "abuse people that objected to her opinion?" Wasn't she the one that got threatened?
/r/MensRights25/10/11 11:37 PM
1

Yet people here want to send her fruit baskets for the imaginary harassment she lied about. How do you know she lied about it?
/r/MensRights25/10/11 09:19 PM
1

why on earth should we, even if it was genuine be gratefull for someone acknowledging that they are a bigot , do we thank the klan when they admit to lyncing black men ? Having an opinion ≠ lynching black people.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 09:14 PM
0

but I didn't denounce any of the guys that reacted strongly to abuse that came from her. So her opinion was "abuse?" Is that how you define it?
/r/MensRights25/10/11 09:12 PM
1

Removing her from the site is "excessive?" How? She didn't accuse anyone of rape, which is apparently what the site was supposed to be for. She's just on there because some assholes decided they don't like her, even after she apologized and changed her mind.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 09:08 PM
0

Isn't register-her a site for women who accuse others of rape? Why are you using it to put women on there you happen not to like? Hell, even when these women agree with you and/or apologize, you still insist on trying to ruin their reputation. What the fuck? Also, just out of curiosity, what do you think of some of the MRAs who are bigoted against women? I mean, the ones that attack women frequently, like The Spearhead? If there were a "register-him" equivalent, would those people belong on ther…
/r/MensRights25/10/11 07:09 PM
1

Yeah, there are bigoted feminists. Believe it or not, we DO speak out against them on places like TwoXChromosomes (at least from what I've seen). Feminists don't make all the laws, bub. Sorry that you're so paranoid.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 12:07 AM
-1

Women attract sex starved male customers because other women aren't having sex with them enough. Because of misandry. Riiiiiiight, because men are entitled to have what they consider to be "enough" sex with the women of their choosing. Evil females! How dare they not give their men enough sex!
/r/MensRights23/10/11 11:06 PM
3

Every time someone uses a widespread characteristic about women that can be observed from the male perspective and uses the general women instead of specific [x] women or woman, there is always a woman like you who comes along and gets offended. That's because people like you take it too far and make it sound like all women have certain negative characteristics. Believe it or not, not all women are shallow. Not all women are vain. Not all women care about clothes and jewelry and shoes. People ar…
/r/MensRights23/10/11 11:01 PM
1

Women have their own shitty expectations to deal with, especially when it comes to fitness, "femininity" and appearance. For example, plenty of MRAs resort to calling a woman a "dyke" if she's not "feminine" enough. That's not only misogynistic, but homophobic. Don't pretend like only men have to deal with society's expectations. You know it's not true.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:55 PM
-1

There are generally way more waitresses than waiters, so of course you're going to notice a lot of bad waitresses if there's a bigger sample size to begin with. I've had plenty of nice, sweet, helpful waitresses. I can't really compare them to waiters because there simply don't seem to be quite as many.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:53 PM
2

What really matters is that men worked and got paid by respect and submission by they wives Would you want to be submissive to someone else? Outside of, like, consensual BDSM or something, "submission" ain't even close to respect. We Westerner females as a whole got sick of the "submission" shit and stood up for ourselves. Get over it.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:51 PM
1

I'm talking about the AVERAGE feminist blogger. Also, I've seen some joke radical feminists, too. MOST feminists are NOT radicals. Why are you willing to overlook MRA bigotry but are more than willing to point out the rad fems?
/r/MensRights20/10/11 08:06 PM
0

I don't know. Some people on this subreddit seem to be perpetuating that notion, as well...
/r/MensRights19/10/11 09:53 PM
3

Smaller? Eh...sorry, but I'll have to disagree with it being "smaller." Look at The Spearhead and the other numerous MRA blogs. Feminism does have its share of crazy, but I've definitely experienced more of it on MRA sites.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 09:49 PM
1

I'm not stuck in a "Democrat versus Republican" mindset, but I do think the GOP is the worse of two evils. I was merely referring to your last sentence. I mean, do you expect poor people to vote for the GOP when the GOP doesn't seem to care about poor people? Hell, many of the GOP supporters seem to complain about poor people wanting "handouts" all the time, even if a lot of those people aren't welfare moms or whatever. I consider myself Independent/unaffiliated, by the way. So yeah.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 09:07 PM
0

You must've touched fuzzy and gotten dizzy! http://bulk.destructoid.com/ul/89512-/touchfuzzy-468x.jpg I ♥ Yoshi's Island. :3
/r/MensRights17/10/11 10:50 PM
0

Why do you think the poor always vote for liberals? Because the GOP doesn't give a shit about anyone who isn't in the elite, rich, ruling class?
/r/MensRights17/10/11 10:37 PM
1

It looks like you wasted your resources and didn't properly educate yourself.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 10:20 PM
1

TwoXChromosomes is a pretty normal, friendly place. This place, on the other hand...holy shit. If you think the women on TXC are "catty," then what the fuck do you call some of the total assholes here? There are some really catty people here. Hell, the front page of this place is guaranteed to have at least half of the links be complaints about women or feminism instead of, you know, men's issues. I don't think you've actually read much of anything on TXC, and I think you're too blind to see the…
/r/MensRights17/10/11 10:18 PM
0

Funny. I don't see you contributing anything.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 10:08 PM
-1

This subreddit dehumanizes women more than anything else possibly could.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 07:57 PM
1

Fuck off, New User.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 05:33 AM
17

Fuck I hate having passionate sex You're obviously lying; clearly, you don't have passionate sex...or any sex, for that matter.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 01:29 AM
1

It's not much of a "civilization" if you take away people's sexual freedom.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:46 PM
-2

Great to know that one woman apparently is the same as "many" other women. By your logic, I could say that "many" men are misogynistic based off of what I find on this subreddit. But no, I realize that this is only one place on the Internet, and many other redditors aren't total woman-blaming assholes.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:45 PM
-1

You are awesome, Brinstar. I love your posts. Plus, I love your name! Metroid FTW! Samus would be proud. ;p
/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:41 PM
-1

This summarizes my thoughts perfectly.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:39 PM
2

One commonly-discussed issue in feminism is perception of one's body, extreme dieting, starvation, anorexia, bulimia, etc. Do you honestly believe that women want other women to suffer in such a way? It's a big fucking problem, and here you are being a fucking ignoramus about it.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:36 PM
4

Right, because only men deserve authority. Women are to be seen and not heard, blah blah blah.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:33 PM
10

Don't drag everyone into a hole of misery just because you're alone and don't want anyone else to enjoy relationships. In other words, sour grapes.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:28 PM
-2

There are a lot of different cancers. It would be nice if they were referring to cancer in general, but that doesn't mean they "forgot" that men die from prostate cancer. Also, while not nearly as prevalent, men get breast cancer, too. For fuck's sake, not everything pink is an attack on men and men's cancers.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:41 PM
-1

Right, clearly all feminists in all of Japan feel the same way. Fantastic misleading title. Generalization is one huge flaw of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:35 PM
-5

It's the axiomatic faith that women are always oppressed, regardless of the situation or the facts. Kind of like how there are so many anti-feminist topics on this subreddit claiming how women are privileged and how men have it much worse in every single way.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:30 PM
-3

Yes, clearly this one article indicates how all feminists think. I didn't find this offensive. I found it funny. What is it with this subreddit and all its "feminists are all like this" threads? Come to think of it, there are a lot of anti-feminist topics in general on here (as opposed to just, you know, focusing on men's issues).
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:27 PM
4

I don't think criticism automatically means "woman-hating." I do, however, think it's misogynistic of you to judge an entire movement (and sometimes even gender) based off of your deluded perceptions. Yes, women do marry down. Some of them are even the breadwinners of their family. This is nothing particularly new.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 02:31 AM
1

How do you even know feminists made this rule? The restaurant did, probably out of fear that there'd be more piss on the floor. Granted, it is a ridiculous rule, but it's not like anyone can stop you from pissing however you please, anyway. Move on and stop blaming feminism for every little thing.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 02:27 AM
4

All I'm saying is that you guys act like men did every single fucking thing. Men took care of their wives and kids. Women took care of their husband and kids. It went both ways. It still does go both ways. You really think women did nothing? Geez.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 08:39 AM
2

I'm not trying to make that comparison. I'm just saying you act like women never did ANYTHING. For fuck's sake...
/r/MensRights12/10/11 08:38 AM
1

Women are in the workplace now, too, ya know. Get real.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 08:38 AM
2

I would never want to resume traditional gender roles. Ever. It harms women. It harms men. It harms boys and girls of all ages. It even harms people who don't fall into any sort of gender binary. A woman can fix a car. A man can cook a meal. We've been doing this for a while now. Where the hell were you all these years?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 02:14 AM
3

Feminists don't "usually" rally against pornography; I would dare to say that most of them are pro-sex. I find that feminists tend to be more knowledgeable about sex, as well as more open to it.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 01:41 AM
2

A significant amount of women accuse men of rape while in reality there has been consensual sex that has ended up being a source of regret and thus has been reported as rape(eg. has to find excuse to boyfriend for being a loose slut). Um...what? Source(s), please. You're not allowed to spew what you deem to be "facts" without evidence.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 01:33 AM
2

Wow, you can't even reply with anything intelligent. I think you're the one who lacks a "rational brain" here.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 10:32 PM
2

You make a good point about the expectation of men to work, go to war, etc. However, I also don't like how you ignore the fact that women were pretty much "to be seen, but not heard." Look at how they're portrayed in religion, as temptresses who lead men astray. They had little to no influence in society, as only men could represent in the government, church, etc. They were— and in some societies, still are— property of fathers, and then husbands. In that sense, they were like children, to be fo…
/r/MensRights10/10/11 10:29 PM
2

For fuck's sake, back up your "facts" with a source. Susan B. Anthony WAS a feminist: "After teaching for fifteen years, she became active in temperance. Because she was a woman, she was not allowed to speak at temperance rallies. This experience, and her acquaintance with Elizabeth Cady Stanton, led her to join the women's rights movement in 1852. Soon after she dedicated her life to woman suffrage. Ignoring opposition and abuse, Anthony traveled, lectured and canvassed across the nation for th…
/r/MensRights10/10/11 10:20 PM
2

Yawn. What a shitty trolling attempt. If you "liked" women you wouldn't be speaking of them in such a way.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 10:10 PM
1

I disagree that "education is geared toward the learning style suited to girls." I mean, what is this "girly learning style" you speak of? Do all girls learn the same way? Do all boys learn the same way? Like I said, I was big on daydreaming. I didn't pay attention in class when I was younger. It annoys me that people think girls are sweet little angels who always pay attention and obey, because I was not like that.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 10:39 PM
1

However, if you look at any feminist blog especially the comments sections where a discussion like this would occur, you would find that the dialogues aren't too far from the scenario presented in this comic. Uh, I pretty much never see anything like what's presented in the comic on a feminist blog/forum/site. Hell, I don't even see the word "wymyn" or "womyn" or whatever being used.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 06:51 PM
3

Then I guess life is stupid because most men are superior to most women and that's just a fact I'm sorry, but could you please provide some sort of citation for your, er, "fact?" I can't seem to find any evidence, due to my having a ladybrain and all.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 06:39 PM
3

Right, everything is the fault of feminism, including things that have nothing to do with it. Let's just blame feminism for everything! Of course, if feminism didn't exist, you'd have to find something else to blame. How...inconvenient.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 06:37 PM
8

I don't hate you woman, Followed by Who the fuck do you think you are you people, you are nothing but machines to produce other males. Sounds contradictory. You claim not to hate women, and then you say we're nothing but "machines to produce other males." I mean...wow. This is why this subreddit is such a cesspool. I feel bad that your "movement" is tainted by misogynists such as yourself.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 06:34 PM
0

So because your mom was an extremist feminist, you're blaming all women/feminists?
/r/MensRights08/10/11 06:12 PM
4

"What isn’t included in the Wikipedia writeup is that the show dealt directly with the feminization of schools and how it negatively affects boys." Okay, I'm sorry, but this sort of talk pisses me off. I'm tired of hearing about everything being "feminized," as if everything were perfect the way it was before. What the hell does it mean to be "feminized," anyway? Boys, just like girls, have different learning styles. I sure as hell couldn't sit still and pay attention in class when I was a kid. …
/r/MensRights08/10/11 06:11 PM
3

Typical MRA shaming language. This is why I can't understand most of you. Maybe not all MRAs are like this, but why are there SO GODDAMN MANY OF THEM? You DO realize you're screwing your own movement over, right?
/r/MensRights08/10/11 05:59 PM
11

I find it funny that people accuse feminism of being about "female superiority." Then they'll claim stupid shit like most men being superior to most women, as if it's a fact and not misogynistic.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 05:56 PM
1

No, rape is a HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUE. Get it right.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 08:35 PM
1

Wow, that is seriously fucked up. Then again, so is this subreddit at times...
/r/MensRights06/10/11 08:34 PM
2

You sound like the kind of character in a novel who speaks about insane conspiracy theories all the time. You must be where writers get their inspiration.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 12:40 AM
2

I, and most other men harm no one, we dont hate women, but we are treated appallingly, and you call us haters for objecting to our treatment by women? Wow, pot calling the kettle black, eh? This comes from the same person who says women have "underdeveloped" minds. If you want people to respect you, then respect THEM first. Idiot.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 12:38 AM
3

Its not about me or you girlfriend, its about public opinion, and they are firmly against feminism :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Who's "they?" Society? You wish.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 12:37 AM
-1

Yeah, I'm sure she wants to suck a guy's dick and receive no pleasure herself when she's releasing menses from her vagina. It's attitudes like that that need to go.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 12:32 AM
2

Even when we do "clamor for the right to be drafted," we're then told we "don't belong on the battlefield." So which one is it, huh?
/r/MensRights02/10/11 12:51 AM
-1

Don't pretend like MRAs don't do the same thing.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 12:44 AM
1

Fucking White Hetero men. All they did was develop and build the enlightened western civilizations that provided free speech and a means by which women could express their desire for more freedom and power. Gee, white-heterosexual-men-who-apparently-created-everything, thanks for letting us womenfolk "express our desire for more freedom and power." You're so terribly kind!
/r/MensRights02/10/11 12:43 AM
5

...Transgender privilege? What privileges could a transgender person possibly have over a non-transgender person?
/r/MensRights02/10/11 12:39 AM
8

The "truth," eh? Care to cite your sources that say female humans have an "underdeveloped mental state?" How about showing us a source with evidence that female humans are halfway animal? There are a lot of women who've contributed way more to society than you ever will. I find it funny that you think misogyny is okay, yet you'd complain about "misandry" in the same breath. But hey, great to hear that you think half of the species is lesser than you because of your pathetic, sexist beliefs.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 12:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter