TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GammaKing Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by GammaKing on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
22

Someone disagrees with the mods' opinions - must be a brigade!
/r/MensRights19/12/13 04:05 PM
3

Welcome to the UK
/r/MensRights09/12/13 08:16 AM
88

Further, the inclusivity of Movember deserves examination. For one, only men (and even then, only some men) can grow a moustache. ...and yet nobody says a thing about women-only events like 'Race For Life' - focused on breast cancer. It's these kinds of double standards which turn feminism into a joke.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 12:59 PM
14

Since she couldn't support rape hysteria with real evidence, she decided to make her own. Can they go any lower?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:55 PM
3

As much as I think TheAmazingAtheist's angry tone doesn't help his rants, he's totally right as usual. That said, men could be doing a lot more about prostate cancer - it's not like feminists are going to start caring.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:24 PM
1

Props to you for being completely reasonable about the situation. It's nice to meet people who aren't part of the "my movement good, their movement bad" narrative. :)
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:46 AM
2

Indeed, which is exactly why I tend to distance myself from both movements. However, there is nothing better out there right now. The petty squabbling between the two movements really hampers progress in my eyes, but it's hard to get control of a group once a vocal minority of extremists arrives.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:42 AM
2

If anything, your point should be a reason for the two movements to work together. That said, is feminism actually doing anything about it? Last I heard there was still a somewhat vocal sect within the movement which still considers men to have no business with children.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:18 AM
1

It seems that in general feminism is a lot more concerned with the first problem you mention while not really doing anything about the second. Part of the reason the MRM exists is because although feminists claim to be working on issues that impact men, the reality is that nothing is improving. The common excuse would be "our issues hurt men too, so we can just work on those". It should be no surprise that a movement like the MRM exists, and has no intention on encouraging discrimination of any …
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:09 AM
1

You know, I agree with you there. The cause of the movement seems true to me, but the way some of the members behave is destructive to that and fuels the "MRAs are just misogynists" argument. I don't particularly affiliate with either movement because of that.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 05:04 PM
4

Feminism is the enemy. Due to the feminist hold on the Democratic party, there is no separating feminists from the state. No other group -- not even the religious right -- has that kind of a hold on one of the parties. Feminists have literal veto power over Democratic legislation. You know, coming out with shit like this is the furthest thing from productive. It gives ammunition to the haters.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 05:00 PM
0

The ironic thing is that I know many feminists who claim that feminism IS an egalitarian movement... ...but surely you'd expect them to have no problem with the MRM if that was the case?
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:57 PM
5

The fact that they could only shout baseless accusations of racism, homophobia and so on is very telling of how unfounded their objections to the movement are.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:55 PM
1

Wow, where did all these downvotes come from?
/r/MensRights29/09/13 09:05 AM
0

You'd have to be pretty deluded to claim the stickers weren't 'gender neutral', actually. As I explained elsewhere in the thread, it's not the intent of the campaign but their approach and attitude to those they're trying to inform which bothered me. Verbal consent is very easy to get - just asking even if only to cover your own ass could never be a bad idea. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone who decides they don't want to sleep with you just because you 'asked for consent'. That is reality.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 09:04 AM
5

A woman says no/doesn't consent = rape. Nice and simple. A woman says 'yes' while she's drunk, the man is sober = taking advantage, but only rape if she's too drunk to actually say no/consent. (I.E. Just because you've had a drink doesn't place responsibility for your actions on those around you). Still best not to sleep with someone in this situation. A woman says 'yes' while she's drunk, the man is also too drunk to refuse = not rape. That's just my opinion. It's a grey area, especially when p…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 11:45 PM
5

Don't be ridiculous. There is a difference between 'drunken sex' and 'drunken rape', but some like to classify them both as rape.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 11:18 PM
10

As others have said before, these studies are flawed, especially given that even when both parties are 'too drunk to consent' that's often still counted as rape on the part of the man. That is, however, beside the point. I'm not sure what planet you live on, but the vast majority of people on campuses have a very good idea of what consent is. The hysteria about the inflated figures that get pushed around creates these sorts of campaigns where people want to try to 'educate' on consent, even thou…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 10:44 PM
3

I probably should have elaborated on the rest of the materials that were there, sorry. Lots of the usual "Be a good man and try not to rape anyone today" sort of stuff. I'm not actually offended by it, I just see it as a bit naive in the same way that giving out "I <3 not stealing" stickers would also be totally pointless.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 10:36 PM
5

I think you're preaching to the choir here. A lot of clubs where I am routinely discriminate in this way, but nobody gives a shit. Best you can do is just not give them your business.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:40 PM
0

I'm not sure people are actually booing the guy - it's not exactly a result people cheer about.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:36 PM
9

I recently went to one of the welcome fairs at my college. On one of the stalls they were giving out similar freebies such as "I <3 consent" stickers and badges. All very patronising. I don't quite get their reasoning - do they think that men need to be made aware that rape is not acceptable?
/r/MensRights28/09/13 02:58 PM
5

In an ideal world you'd be right, in my eyes. While the victim of a crime is never to blame, a certain amount of common sense is needed to avoid putting yourself at risk. Sure, you can walk around holding a wad of cash, but it's undeniable that that would be a bad idea. Ideally you should be able to, but the reality is simply the opposite. I guess what I'm trying to put across is that "I should be able to do this" isn't really an excuse to go ahead. It's still reckless because that's the society…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 11:29 AM
1

I think that the extent of messaging is an important factor here. I'm referring to the posts where it's usually about 3 months apart that the person's messaged them. It's worth mentioning that the significance the person attaches to a message is also important - 'hi' can take a second to write and often the sender isn't bothered about getting a reply. It's when someone consistently writes paragraphs with no response that it gets 'creepy' in my view. That line between pestering and normal behavio…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 03:23 PM
2

You're saying people don't like being rejected, and that's true. However, not rejecting someone and then complaining because they aren't acting like they've been rejected is ridiculous. The important thing here is to avoid assuming that people can't handle rejection - most can. If OP doesn't like the sender, either politely ask them to cut contact or delete/block them. It's that simple. I know there's a pressure to not come off as an asshole, but that is in how you handle it rather than whether …
/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:05 PM
3

You meet someone in a bar, get along well and agree to add eachother on facebook. Back home you message with 'hi', she doesn't respond and you forget about it. A few months later you're bored and want to talk to someone - she's online so you say 'hi' just as you do to a few other people, she doesn't respond and so you forget about it once more. Rinse and repeat. There doesn't have to be anything malicious involved. Once again the assumption in the subreddit is that said person is harassing the r…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 11:56 AM
2

If they start a conversation and each time the recipient doesn't respond at all, then there is either a serious miscommunication going on or the recipient doesn't wish to reply. I'd agree with you if it was every few days, but when months pass it's not unreasonable to message someone again. Hell, I'd forget the last conversation I had with someone after months. Posting it on the subreddit and whining "OMG this guy tried to talk to me every few months" is pathetic in these cases. Also, asking peo…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 11:15 AM
1

Are you kidding me? If someone tries to start a conversation every few months and the other person doesn't respond, that's not 'creepy' in any sense. A lot of the time people don't reply when they're just busy. If the poster had a problem with it, perhaps just asking him not to contact her would solve it? It's this attitude that pretty much embodies why /r/creepypms is a total farce. It's all about hating on the message sender regardless of whether they're being totally reasonable. Any suggestio…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 09:25 AM
1

...and have your comments here been deleted? Have you been banned yet?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 09:24 AM
3

You're actually right - people here are more likely to agree with the poster. ...However, given that trying to post this on the sub itself would result in deletion and banning, I don't know what you expected. (For the record, I don't actually agree with most of what the OP is saying, but you can't really complain that he's posting it somewhere that isn't censored.)
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:51 AM
-1

Yup, they have done in the past. The only meta threads allowed are those which are in line with the mod's opinions.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:47 AM
8

I agree that that subreddit has an obvious agenda that they push. I've seen a lot of posts where it's actually the OP being a total asshole to some guy that sends even a respectful and polite message, but anyone that dares point that out has their posts deleted and risks getting banned because of their "the OP is automatically the victim" rule. Then there's the cases where some posters go about asking for said messages (I.E. "PM me what you'd do to me") to post them up and circlejerk about how h…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter