| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | In an ideal world, everybody would have an ideal life and dating experience. But it's just not possible for everybody.What would you say to a very talented person, who starts a company, gets investments from wealthy people, and buys machinery and hires workers who consent to the exchange of labor/wages, and they sell the product to customers who consent to the price, and when a poor person asks that person to contribute to a social service, they say “I don’t owe you anything/you don’t own me”? I think in the west the only things that have really made people poorer / sicker are things like the Indian removal act… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/05/25 07:12 PM |
| 4 | In an ideal world, everybody would have an ideal life and dating experience. But it's just not possible for everybody.I think most people have a fondness of breeding/gene replication, but I hope that more people are convinced of ur statement | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/05/25 06:18 PM |
| 4 | In an ideal world, everybody would have an ideal life and dating experience. But it's just not possible for everybody.The policy I describe is more so a form of “social democracy” which is not socialism, i think also it only works if there is a small percentage in need of social services with a large percentage who are producing a lot, it’s probably unrealistic if the former is a larger percentage and the latter is a smaller percentage | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/05/25 06:12 PM |
| 7 | In an ideal world, everybody would have an ideal life and dating experience. But it's just not possible for everybody.I think that it’s possible to increase the merit of the merit-less rather than authoritarian coercion of reluctant parties, for example in some European countries, the government pays for cosmetic surgeries if someone is unhappy with their outcomes. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/05/25 05:55 PM |
| 1 | In an ideal world, everybody would have an ideal life and dating experience. But it's just not possible for everybody.What do u mean in the second paragraph? If society is committed to a degree of “redistribution”, and the unpopular people have accepted, then why would the grievances not matter / they have to pound sand? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/05/25 05:51 PM |
| 3 | In an ideal world, everybody would have an ideal life and dating experience. But it's just not possible for everybody.In theory 99 percent of people can pair up and not be single, the issue is there are a lot of ugly people who want average looking partners , and average looking people who want attractive partners. The quickest way to create post-scarcity of social status, is “gene selection”. Even if one is a gene / breeding purist, at a certain technological / productive stage, transplanting someone’s brain into an attractive cloned body would be as trivial as buying a tooth brush today, someone could even be… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/05/25 05:41 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter