TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Garek Archive

View 0 posts and 61 comments by Garek on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
43

Found a gem in the comments Guys don’t get the idea of having wild impromptu sex with strangers but limiting sex with people you love to only certain acts. You can try to explain it all you want, but most guys are incapable of believing it. Don’t expect that your future SO will ever accept that idea that you are being slow or vanilla with him because you love him more.
/r/MGTOW21/06/20 11:31 AM
4

I've seen people seriously claim that being too drunk to drive means you're too drunk to consent. Which is absolutely absurd seeing as how that about 2-3 drinks for most people. Makes me wonder how much drunk driving these people are doing.
/r/MGTOW22/05/20 08:55 AM
-15

Anti-semitic shit.
/r/MGTOW18/04/20 03:57 AM
3

You do realize this is only a few times worse than the annual flu right? And it's disproportionatly killing old people. Society really won't notice the people being gone.
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 08:16 PM
3

Hello fellow sfdebris viewer.
/r/MGTOW25/03/20 05:42 PM
11

What was gained with the victory of the US on Korea and Vietnam? Nothing, as the US lost Vietnam and Korea was a stale mate (hence North Korea). Overall though I agree with you.
/r/MGTOW09/03/20 09:49 AM
13

Bloomberg is the biggest anti-gunner ever. Bernie's no friend to guns but at least it isn't his first priority.
/r/MGTOW20/02/20 01:16 PM
15

Why the fuck would it be removed?
/r/MGTOW13/02/20 10:23 PM
0

Abortions terminate a thing that doesn't have a brain and thus not deserving moral consideration. That said guns shouldn't be banned either.
/r/MGTOW16/01/20 10:11 AM
1

Almost all biblical scholars believe most everyone in the bible was fictional. The only one that has a case for historicity is Jesus but even that isn't 100%
/r/MGTOW13/10/19 03:08 AM
2

Lol everyone is religious, so long as you define religion differently than everyone else. There's a huge difference between trust and faith.
/r/MGTOW13/10/19 03:05 AM
1

Believe it or not not everyone bases their self worth on how good a slave to a corporation they can be. And most people don't have the luxury to do something they'd enjoy anyway. You would have to have a very sheltered view of the world to think this is the norm.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 12:24 PM
3

Because school shootings serve the gun control agenda
/r/MGTOW20/08/18 04:06 AM
3

You don't give them so much that they live a lavish lifestyle, therefore there's no incentivising
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:48 PM
1

OP said injure. Property isn't people.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:21 AM
2

IMO it would make more sense as a wellfare sort of system, rather than putt2the burden entirely on the ex.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 11:12 PM
9

Are you too thick to understand the reductio ad absurdum form of argument? The statement "If it is legal, Then it is right" was put forth, and counter examples were cited, implying that more nuance is clearly necessary if OP wants to make their point. There is no comparison being made in regard to the severity these things.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 09:07 PM
3

There's a difference between having that fear and acknowledging it's an irrational one, and claiming that your fear is riteous and that all men really are to blame
/r/MensRights24/10/17 12:38 AM
5

What we should do as a society is admit that not everyone needs to love kids and it's ok not to be a parent. Calling someone selfish for being duped doesn't help anything
/r/MensRights05/10/17 03:18 AM
5

OP probably meant club, as normal bars don't charge admission and there's kinda a set price on orders
/r/MensRights05/08/17 03:36 AM
1

Inheritance tax only applies when one has a net worth over several million. In which case, I'll go play him the worlds tiniest violin to express my sympathies.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:32 AM
11

There are plenty of men that don't care for the implied polygamy of dating either.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 12:55 PM
-2

Every bar I take my baby to doesn't have them Why the fuck would you take a baby to a bar?
/r/MensRights11/03/15 01:46 PM
1

Being not OK to drive is only about 2 drinks though.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:23 AM
4

Your child is not your property sir. His rights trumps any "rights" you might have.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:02 PM
1

I don't see anything contradictory about enjoying oneself and being immature. If anything, we are beginning to attempt to infantalize young adults too much, which will only cause them to actually act immature, despite being capable of maturity.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:05 AM
1

You have excessively high standards for what "grown up" means. I can't help but wonder what would happen if a young person could mention their age without having their opinions ridiculed in an ad hominem attack, perhaps they would be more interested in conversing about serious issues with others.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 02:56 PM
4

If you think NYT is far left wing you haven't met far left wing.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 10:41 PM
1

And I think you're incredibly wrong, and that that kind of education only fosters sexism.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 02:11 PM
12

I'd prefer removing the draft all together.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:00 PM
2

And people say we don't live in a police state.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 07:38 PM
-10

Such communities shouldn't be based on what people believe.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 06:03 AM
3

It should be pointed out that use of a weapon is not necessarily escalation, as the standard for the use of deadly force is fear or life or great bodily harm, which can easily be accomplished by fists.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:21 PM
4

Sometimes people forget that not all teens are twigs.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:50 AM
1

Part of the issue I think is that they are either unable or unwilling to distinguish between horseplay among friends and legitimate bullying behavior.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:53 AM
4

Well you have plenty of rights, the school just refuses to recognize them.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 08:13 AM
3

How about we move towards less excessive regulation of young people's lives?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:35 AM
1

IMO if we as a society feel that the child/parent needs the extra money, then it should come from the taxpayer.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 06:09 AM
1

I don't see why young people can't have valid opinions. I don't think young people have as much "cocky certainty" as you think. Maybe you were cocky, but that doesn't mean that young people are on the whole.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 11:09 AM
1

/r/amr looks like it was?
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:49 AM
1

It is, however, an important philosophical distinction, as it allows one to disagree with the state.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:13 AM
0

Yes it is. Just because people don't respect a right doesn't mean they don't exist.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:13 AM
7

I was assuming "bitch" was referring to the woman.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:08 AM
1

I believe they were using "man" in the archaic form meaning "person", which people tend to do when they try to make witty philosophical quotes.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:49 AM
1

And again when it comes to children under the age of consent their feelings about the matter should not have anything to do with the point The thing is you have to justify why one age should be an "under age child" while another is not.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:12 AM
3

all resources are being thrown at attacking college boys *men. College students are adults, not children.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 07:05 PM
1

Teenagers would possibly not be so shitty if they weren't shat upon at every possible turn.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 05:46 PM
1

within the submissions totaling ~3% of all subscribers is a huge overlap is completely disingenious. That's not how statistics work. See my comment here
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:49 AM
2

Fun fact about statistics is that sample sizes don't need to be particularly large at all. A sample size of 2000, assuming the population is much larger than 2000, and that the sample is random (which is the hard part of statistics, getting a random sample), you can determine a proportion to about 3%. Source
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:48 AM
2

The child is suppose to get those monies Because we all know it never happens any different.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:57 AM
1

Personally I don't think anyone understands the mind well enough to make any sort of claims regarding how much of his mental state was due to his biology, his environment, or a combination thereof. For all we know, having a woman show interest in him would have been sufficient for him not to have been a mass killer. Probably wouldn't have cured all of his crazy, but may have pushed him towards getting help and sane. Then again, he might have been beyond helping. The point is we don't know and it…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:25 AM
1

The same is true of /r/gentlemanboners
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:17 AM
6

The old spice commercials would be an example of this.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:09 AM
3

These are not contradictory sides. Bad people exist, and it makes sense to take reasonable precautions against being an easy target, but it is not reasonable to be irrationally afraid of a person simply because they are a man, or to use the fact that they are a man to discriminate.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:32 PM
1

Probably some of the ones he stabbed too.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:22 AM
0

The scenario of a presumably weaker woman hitting a stronger man isn't any different than a weaker man hitting a stronger man, or a weaker woman hitting a stronger woman.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 11:03 AM
1

I think it us more insulting to just use their first name I'm going to have to disagree with you there. The world would be a better place if people learned from a young age that we are all equal, and that everyone deserves respect. Not just you "superiors"
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:27 AM
1

Everybody's opinions are entitled and arrogant at 22. This is not true in the slightest. They are entitled young people but they are not the only kind that exist. They probably just stayed the fuck away from you.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 12:41 AM
1

The point is that the earliest farmers might not have been much better than hunter-gatherers. Obviously it worked out in the long run.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 12:24 AM
4

What's any reasonable person going to do? Not use excessive fucking force.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 09:34 AM
0

What I don't understand is why the kid isn't at home with the mother. It's disrespectful to everyone else, including the kid, to take them on errands everywhere.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter