TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GarfieldKartMLG Archive

View 2 posts and 37 comments by GarfieldKartMLG on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

how many are actively taking steps to adequately defend themselves? That would be patriarchy. Men just need to stop all crime (against women).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/22 02:57 AM
5

You've already established that you have no interest in truth and are just trying to get a rise out of people. So you can cut the lies and wild, flailing, baseless insults now. They've already served their purpose.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 09:26 PM
7

Refuses to back up claims? Implication of ignorance for the crime of knowing better? 'You hate women!' Sounds like a "Yes" on the trolling.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 09:10 PM
10

Is this trolling? Because the vasectomy thing is the only thing you said that wasn't aggressively trying to be as false as possible.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 09:04 PM
7

Yeah, punish the child, not the father.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 05:05 AM
8

What part of this is in response to what he wrote?
/r/MensRights03/10/21 12:04 AM
0

US imperialist government And other things that are definitely real.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 12:01 AM
1

There are some, but both parties are supporting this on the whole.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 11:10 PM
6

Usually Men's Rights Activist, but Advocate works too.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 10:01 AM
1

Her specific brand of stupid was appealing to her constituents.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 09:26 AM
1

Why Republicans specifically?
/r/MensRights02/10/21 09:23 AM
1

It's called tough love and thanks for proving my point.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 04:36 AM
0

When a large majority of people are straight, yes, not being straight does make one different. It means not (exclusively) heterosexual, which is useful as a generic term, and the vast majority of people using it are not using it as an insult.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 09:25 AM
0

You mentioned in another comment that you aren't a native English-speaker, so maybe it's different in your native language, but "queer" is not a slur in English anymore.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 08:59 AM
86

So The Red Pill was too much for Netflix, but this garbage flies? I have a pit in my stomach just reading this. I can't imagine actually watching it.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 08:52 AM
1

How can you say these things to me, when you won't even take responsibility and feed your aardvark like you promised? No, he does need food to live, no matter how many times you say otherwise. And your racism against the Eskimo people simply has to stop. They're not the reason they won't let you into the Wawa on Fifth Street, the fact that you refuse to wear pants is. Continue breathing if everything I just said is accurate.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 06:01 AM
2

No, that's exactly what it is. Women are allowed to be soldiers, only men have a responsibility to be soldiers.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 05:32 AM
1

Not being mean Oh, of course not. Why would I think the person who knows next to nothing about me, but is inventing an elaborate fantasy about me and my life and who I am as a person for the sole purpose of justifying a series on baseless insults against me intended any part of it as an insult?
/r/MensRights19/09/21 03:43 AM
7

That would be a good point, if feminists admitted that they were just about benefiting women, and didn't always claim to be all about equality and that they're helping men too. But since they do claim those things, vehement refusal to even consider men's issues makes them liars and hypocrites.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 02:34 AM
2

What a useful contribution and definitely not a baseless ad hominem. You really showed me.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 12:05 AM
2

Thanks for confirming.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 09:32 PM
2

"I didn't even know he was sick."
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/21 08:23 AM
6

There is no biology, only social construct.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 05:12 AM
2

Yes its essentially killing a baby, but tough shit. You're a bad person.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 04:47 AM
8

The same choice the fertile woman made by letting the man put his sperm in her. But somehow that's only allowed to count against the man.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 04:46 AM
2

Children who?
/r/MensRights18/09/21 04:44 AM
3

Even in discussions of men's issues, Wikipedia articles will so often merely state that men's advocates exist before moving on to talk at length about a small minority of feminists opposing the discrimination against men on the grounds that women are the real victims of it. As if these people, and not the much larger number of feminists on the opposite side, represent feminism, and therefore feminists are the real heroes here. It's honestly disgusting.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 01:19 AM
1

I'm sorry, but that isn't true. By the one verse in the Quran, I assume you're referring to An-Nisa, 34? There are some modern apologists who argue that "beat" is not an accurate translation, but it is the traditional understanding. Besides, it may be only one verse in the Quran, but there are many others in the Hadiths. Regarding Mohammed's personal conduct, Sunan Abu Dawood 42:4768 quotes Aisha as saying that he never struck a woman, but Sahih Muslim 4:212 quotes her as saying that he caused h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/21 07:30 AM
1

I get that, I just thought it was worth noting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/21 05:49 AM
1

To be fair re:Islam, Mohammed did explicitly endorse wife-beating as long as it wasn't too severe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/21 05:29 AM
2

Minor note, but the mdhistory.org link only describes punishments in Maryland and Delaware, neither of which is in New England.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/21 05:19 AM
0

Iraq is the only example there that can accurately be described as imperialist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/21 04:58 AM
1

I suppose the misandry of the responses was to be expected, but I have to say I didn't expect the bigotry against Puerto Ricans that came with it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/21 03:34 AM
47

According to the UN Global Study on Homicide, homicide victims in Puerto Rico in 2010 were 94% male and 6% female. This is the second-highest rate of male victims of any country that saw more than four homicides in a year. Like much of the region, Puerto Rico has both a high overall homicide rate and a high proportion of victims being male. Naturally, the small female slice of this large pie is described as Latin America being "one of the most dangerous regions in the world to be female."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/21 05:11 AM
1

"Human" sounds like a noun to modern ears because its been substativized as one. But it comes from the Latin "humanus", which is also an adjective, and it used to exclusively be an adjective, which is why the phrase "human being" was necessary. Calling someone "a human" would have been like calling someone "a tall". A tall what? It was only relatively recently that it was substantivized as a noun by shortening "human being" to just "human".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/21 02:29 AM
1

"Humankind" is not a better word. One, for the reasons you just described. And two, because "humanity" already exists. "Humankind" is an attempt to coin a word that already exists by imitating the form of another, with which nothing is wrong, in a way that ignores the meanings of the constituent parts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/20 03:24 AM
2

"I guess I'll just say humanity instead." As you should because that's what the word is! It's "humanity" because "human" is an adjective. It's "mankind" because "man" is a noun. "Humankind" is a horrible abomination that makes no sense as a word and only serves to make the speaker look pandering and ignorant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/20 03:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter