TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Gathorall Archive

View 0 posts and 246 comments by Gathorall on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Public opinion turning is an indicator of slow change, institutional power is still firmly in the hands of feminists who aren't going to let go of it anytime soon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 06:40 PM
2

Men have been codified be less-than human in many jurisdictions in those years, so misandry is going really strong, now they're strong enough to outright write in the law that women are the most equal animal, over all others. The counterforces may have become more apparent, but it is a long road to reverse course with the overwhelming institutional power feminists have gathered, especially as they seem intent to cash it out on short order as a response.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 06:37 PM
5

Indeed. After all in doing so you demonstrate that you actually don't believe all of us were created equal, so nothing stops you from opening the flood gates to bigotry. In that moment all your morality is build on sand.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 06:32 PM
2

I think she knew but didn't care. I'm enough of a humanist to believe people that ignorant or stupid do not actually exist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 06:05 PM
2

Closed-minded bigot with unimaginative insults. A portrait of a modern "progressive".
/r/MensRights12/01/26 02:50 PM
4

On that front men are at present called to do quite a bit more. A woman can show frustration at work when called for. Agitation. Be mischievous at times. Even be elated. Show fear or sadness. And various other shows of personality that for a man can be construed as agression or sexual advances with potentially career ending consequences.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 01:36 AM
1

Ypu come here and essentially say "Well we all know men's core issues with this is they are whiny babies who get their feewings hurts by petty inconsequential insults and I'm not willing to see it any other way." And then you bring up good faith. That your misandrist drivel was even allowed on the sub in an extraordinary and I think frankly inordinate show of good faith toward your misandrist self and yet you complain.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 12:55 PM
1

I directly challenged, not implied. I don't like to play games. You on other hand are there to play a game where you insist your opponent have both arms and one leg tied behind their back so looking at it like you want to force your own victory in the argument is a reasonable assumption.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 12:47 PM
1

I assumed good faith where it could be assumed. Was I supposed to twist your words not to be so misandrist? That would not let you see anything. Or did you come to fish for compliments about your idea?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 12:40 PM
1

You misunderstand the issue fundamentally and go the specific hardcore misandrist route of claiming men as individuals and collective are to blame. Mindy is wholly a bad person yet you blame the victim for taking offense of they do, and excuse the bad behaviour if they don't. You also ignore the systemic issues related to this, like men being pushed out of entering caring professions, beyond hiring some punching bags for violent patients. You count so firmly among your individual misandrists tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 09:41 AM
23

Specific. Innumerable systemic advantages. Adundant extra healtcare spending for the healthier sex. Extra education prospects, aid and projects for the sex dominating admission and graduation from universities in almost all programs, fairly even in the rest. Mentoring programs and preferred hiring even by law for the sex dominating early career employment and so advancement prospects as is. Several departments in every level of goverment exist purely to advantage women. These are used to minimiz…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/26 06:57 PM
20

Not extreme? Leftist policy is pushing more and more advantages to women they have already raised far above young men. What's too far for you? Concentration camps?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/26 06:38 PM
28

So democracy too is to be abandoned to advantage women?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 07:57 AM
22

Which is quite an argument. Animals are treated as lower life forms as they cannot help but to act according to their instincts. Women are excused by lowering them to the level of beasts while spinning that inescapable fact.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 11:49 PM
2

The west has never believed in human rights.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 03:30 PM
3

You're doing it right now. Then again you're obviously not in your right mind, Prorape-lady.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 10:45 PM
20

Doest the fact that men are stronger on average mean men beating women is only natural and therefore just to you?
/r/MensRights15/12/25 05:22 PM
10

The woman had sex with him under false pretenses. She's a piece of shit serial rapist.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 05:19 PM
4

Why do we have to know about her familial situation? Why has the judge? Is justice not supposed to be blind? If possible, a judge shouldn't even a know a suspects age or gender beyond if they're criminally culpable.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 12:17 PM
1

Selfishness and willfull ignorance are evil things. Therefore choosing feminism is evil. Like all those other examples of more apparent selfishness or callousness. The disguise of "ideology" to justify being selfish piece of shit like mainstream feminists are, just gives that evil behavior a veneer of respectability. But a person who insists they deserve more because of their gender isn't any better than a thief or a violent person. Both place themselves above other people and the others as tool…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 11:07 AM
3

All kinds of things appeal to people. Drunkards aren't good people. Violent people aren't good. Greedy people aren't good. Bullies aren't good people. Rapists aren't good people. But when you add the veneer of "ideology" I am supposed to respect people picking and choosing selfish actions and beliefs for their own benefit and ignoring plain truth they can see just by seeking out information?
/r/MensRights15/12/25 12:09 AM
5

Good people are not quick to harm. And stupidity isn't an excuse. No one is that stupid, a smart dog could see past those lies if they made an effort. Willing ignorance of the world is choosing to be evil every day of your life. Like these "feminists" do.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 11:52 PM
7

Well answer the question? Is a person good if they subscribe to evil ideologies, merely because they personally believe they're on the right side? A person is their choices. Ideology is a choice. If your own choice of ideology is evil isn't that who you are as a person?
/r/MensRights14/12/25 11:13 PM
13

Fascists believe they're working for the good of society. Are they good individuals in your book?
/r/MensRights14/12/25 11:06 PM
19

Yet they rarely if ever sing about any personal aspiration over getting a dude, having a dude, trying to forget a dude. Hell, if they have aspirations that's sidelined over how their boyfriend or ex feels about their aspirations.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 03:55 PM
7

It's naturally a nonsense debate when it is a callous misandrist debating callous misandrists about men's issues.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 10:06 AM
65

Two years of slavery is really not a privilege. And it's murder on young men's career advancement.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 03:53 PM
20

And being a a woman gets you heavy discount on the sentence for murdering your already born children. It isn't even called murder in statistics to falsify them. So actually women can go around murdering actual born children with lesser sentences by law in most European countries.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 01:32 PM
7

If you can forget about doing something for decades you probably should not have became a parent anyway.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 05:52 PM
9

Uk's imperialist spread of moral decay seems to be doing as well as ever.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 09:05 PM
12

The music industry got a license to recycle decades of material, of course they will jump at chance
/r/MensRights21/11/25 02:38 PM
8

-Judge people not for the color of their skin but the content of their trousers. That's what King said, right?
/r/MensRights07/11/25 10:04 AM
1

Damnit, I can't find the one sourced right now with more. However just look at Beck too. 6. 0 I don't feel I am being punished. 1 I feel I may be punished. 2 I expect to be punished. 3 I feel I am being punished. Some hack have also translated 3 to "I feel I should be punished, and left the others as are, which is means the question for and atheist is 0 or 3. You heard this right, this hack" science" doesn't even bother checking the translations of the religion it let slip trough. Utter nonsense…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/25 10:37 AM
7

Scientifically. Which standard psychology often doesn't hold itself. Wildly prejudicial or poorly thought out questions, (For example, being an atheist still gets you a few points in current commonly used "scientifically validated" depression inventories.) , interpretation twisting objective results, discarding data that doesn't fit one's premade model are just a few of common failures of the field. It's not that we should stop studying psychology, we should study it properly. Major psychologica…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 08:21 PM
8

No, I'm just saying the field of psychology doesn't hold itself to a high enough standard to produce much scientific knowledge rather than manipulated affirmations of their own prejudices.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 08:14 PM
9

Exceedingly little of psychology is in any way actual science.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 07:50 PM
17

So? If their groups aren't hate groups why would that be a problem?
/r/MensRights19/10/25 06:33 AM
1

You ever read how Roe vs Wade was actually arrived at? That ruling was 98% bending the wording and spirit of law in pursuit of ideology. It was a shoddy shortcut that should have been repealed not for ideology, but because it was a misuse of judiciary power to effectively make law that didn't exist, bypassing congress and the whole democratic process.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 10:20 PM
7

Real empathy extends to people you don't have personal relationships or any special rapport with. If your empathy stops at your circle it isn't actually empathy, just self-interest extended to wanting good things for people you happen to like.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 04:31 PM
3

However seeing (or just choosing to describe) an obvious offensive caricature as a simple stand-in makes you misandrist.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 09:13 AM
4

I think you misspelled "offensive caricature" pretty badly, "stand-in" does not spell anything like that.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 08:54 AM
17

It is just an example. It should be obvious mutilating people is morally wrong. And as such you could give almost any example. Chop off your kid's middle finger to deter rudeness, in for a penny in for a pound. Similarly accepting male genital mutilation is a convincing argument for practioners of female genital mutilation, to continue: if mutilation, harmfully altering the body with no medical cause, is not morally wrong, the degree of damage seems a small detail. There's no benefit to balance,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 09:00 PM
2

People who believe so vehemently in things that are obviously not true have gone past that barrier long ago.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 08:48 AM
-2

If God was omnipotent every evil that exists is punishment from them. Of course God doesn't exist, but that is really beside the point other than demonstrating another way billions of people are deluded.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 03:16 PM
7

Well, billions of people believe that a benevolent God is right to punish humans forever for wrongs their ancestors allecedly did while literally unable to tell right from wrong, ergo not being moral actors anyway. Basic morality is quite apparently too challenging of a concept for the majority.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:53 PM
5

Yeah, people complaining about young men reportedly disrespecting other demographics, while the whole study is predicated in discovering ways to make them better livestock.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 07:52 AM
2

Sorry to burst you bubble but that hasn't stopped the female supremacy movement in any other country.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 07:43 AM
13

Even if they are weak and insecure, so what? That's only human, I thought the core of leftist thought was to help others in need, whatever their lot in life. Does that liberal in their sub name actually mean the far-right version, where oppression is awesome but they are working towards only how rich you are mattering towards who wears the boot?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 07:40 AM
22

It is quite perplexing how women managed to make it about oppression that they preferentially get all the starter jobs with the strict requirement of a pulse. I wouldn't mind swapping to the situation where your gender isn't a major hurdle to even first entering the workforce. And of course if it is customer facing this continues however far you go because being seen giving a man a job in 2025 labels you a chauvinist organisation.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 12:48 PM
26

"Exceeded parity benchmark" That means growing inequality you hateful supremacist frauds!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 09:07 AM
9

Much like therapy being less effective on men is men's problem, but I've never heard anyone say women are bad at having heart events so they deserve worse care.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 10:26 PM
4

We? This sub does not claim a political angle.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 08:35 AM
0

Finding an another awful person to his side didn't make kirk a better person. Also he believed things that would made him a horrible leader.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 07:33 AM
3

Women commit more and more severe child abuse so often they got a special discount pass for murdering them.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 07:56 PM
7

If they're not outright outlawed, we'll that's the women's decision really. I seriously doubt you have state-sponsored men's radio.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 09:30 AM
11

Feminism is a hate movement because it is working towards supremacy, towards placing one kind of people to be more important than others. That is fascist goal, camps or not. Feminists steal money and power from egalitarian pursuits by pretending to be something it is obvious to an objective observer they're not. Female supremacy in all walks of life is the minimum of equality in feminist made frameworks, and however bad things are for men, in feminist fascist thought patterns women being advanta…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 11:12 PM
6

Well if feminism is openly a hate movement you deserve as much public funding and institutional power as the Ku Klux Klan. Yet you are afforded plenty of both, most of any movement working towards supremacy of a group.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 10:37 PM
4

Men's dress codes often require at least full sleeves or even a jacket. Are you an idiot or just pretending so you can make an obviously invalid point?
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:41 PM
1

Ah, the strawman, the losing debater's favorite, goodbye my job is done.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:33 PM
1

If one group can bring their comfort level up simply by dressing sensibly, lowering the comfort level of the other is needless hostility towards and devaluing of them.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:29 PM
5

Adding a jacket isn't underdressing in any context. It makes no sense to set the heat onto a level that recludes one group's comfort with acceptable dress, unless you just hate them.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 01:54 PM
10

UN is the League of Nations but with no real goals so they couldn't miserably fail at them. Unfortunately they invented new branches to waste resources and be awful at.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 04:28 PM
19

Lack of a moral backbone is no excuse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/25 06:38 PM
11

Remember, burqas are a free choice of self-actualized strong women.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 07:44 PM
47

Criminal activity by definition in my country.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 07:42 AM
43

"We were arguing." Nice of her to just freely give her motive away on arrest and reaffirm again and again there was no exonorating cause for criminal behavior, just becoming abusive faced with frustration as if that was natural and good.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 08:12 AM
28

That's less than the problem. Many countries fund feminists with little expenses spared, as they're considered the primary champions of equality. A ground level association can't challenge the state establishment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/25 07:29 AM
5

No one is that stupid.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 11:21 PM
11

*Murdered by cultists.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 07:31 PM
1

To be fair, blacking out on the estate system, which was pan-European with minor differences, is an unexpected knowledge gap. You can't really understand hundreds of years of European history without knowing that basic framework.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 05:59 PM
16

You have it backwards. In the absense of solid evidence any way officials should always assume people could be lying about the misdeeds of others. You're suggesting a policy of guilty until proven innocent. Not that many don't actually use precisely that kind of policy, but that doesn't make it any less horrendously wrong.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 05:16 PM
6

It is darkly funny how many things that actually matter are decided by these cancerous growths of the justice system that don't even pretend to hold themselves to standards of proof considered a prerequisite for just decisions, despite having enormous power over people. Courts of every flavour, disciplinary committees, admission to public schools and access to their resources defined as free choice or particularly not for some people, all the legal decisions in a regular person's life are made a…
/r/MensRights17/07/25 09:28 AM
0

From the beginning "newspapers" were published by interest groups and as straight up goverment propaganda. The media was rotten before it really came to be. The insistence on impartial media wasn't originally an ideal or an observation of how media was: it was a ground rule to work towards to make media more than propaganda and libel by interest groups. Impartiality by news organisation is valued because historically they're awful at it, and mostly didn't even really try. They're building on san…
/r/MensRights01/07/25 08:16 PM
1

I don't trust people who manage to believe in things that are obviously false.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 06:11 AM
61

Well, falling for such blatant manipulation is partly on you.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 07:43 PM
6

If your goal is equality you can't meet halfway with bigots. Feminists need to fundamentally change.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 02:19 PM
5

Typical social butterfly with zero empathy and little emotional intelligence. It is sure easy to speak with people when you don't give a shit about anyone else anyway.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 12:54 PM
93

As if murder would have been justified if she was right.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 08:25 PM
4

Well, on that, billions of people actually believe culpability can transmit trough a family line like a hereditiary diseases, so we are quite optimistic with our expected level of moral development.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 08:32 AM
5

But they do. If other people decide your place in society is less for being how you are, it is less, and it affects you. You are just one part, you can't wish or think away collective judgement. There is no societal tally besides the judgement of others.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 09:15 AM
6

If my masculinity is completely different from yours, then we should definitely stop using the word, as it doesn't even have a meaning, and so is worthless at facilitating communication already, therefore, metahysically speaking not even a word as such.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 07:05 AM
4

You're still way off. The concepts of feminity and masculinity are bigoted and we should get rid of them. Almost nothing humans do is actually connected to their gender with anything else than outdated social conventions. Yet almost everything is categorized in that bigoted framework. That framework should not exist, it is a way backwards.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 07:00 AM
5

That isn't what I am saying. Just that "masculinity" or "feminity" are outdated, bigoted descriptors. Fixing a car, appreciating flowers, doing laundry, and most all things part of living as a person aren't actually gendered at all. To categorise parts of life as such is to heed conservative ideals.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 06:56 AM
6

Defining things as "Masculine and feminine" is rigid and prejudiced. It is tacit approval of an opressive system to use its framework, we don't call non-christians pagan just because it was a term once, and gaslight people to say it doesn't mean anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 06:43 AM
6

So did gods and kings, slavery, and so on have purpose, but we have to let go of old conceptions rooted on inequality and prejudice if we are to go forward. Your argument is here is just "tradition good, don't touch it." Are you sure you didn't take a wrong turn at Albequerque to end at /r/LeftwingMaleAdvocates ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 06:32 AM
1

Well, it seems there is, the crooked kind.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 02:36 PM
7

However much you like her having a child with such an unstable person was morally inexcusable of you.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 07:24 PM
2

Ideals to a degree are fine, but they're often confused about executing them. US Democrats point and laugh at Trump voters as food prices increase. One big reason? Exploited, paperless foreign workers are less available to agriculture. Which one would assume is a good thing for a party that claims to care about the working class.
/r/MensRights04/05/25 03:11 PM
12

That doesn't excuse letting gay perverts masturbate in public without repercussions. This is working against you in the long run.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 11:26 AM
17

Then they proceed to complain how they must do all the emotional labour in relationships.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 10:45 AM
5

That doesn't matter. Can't you do math? In total anything bad at all is still far less likely to happen to women. How many types doesn't matter, it just causes more feelings and thoughts about danger you insist are rational, which they obviously are not.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 10:19 AM
13

That is a lie. Statistically men should be much more afraid. Please educate yourself and stop spreading feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 07:30 PM
2

"Actual feeling of gender inside your brain." How is that not saying you have a biological gender? Also, when you were born you didn't even know you existed. You discovered you have arms, hands, a mouth, a nose, and that your mother was actually someone else. Yet you suggest a strict immutable map of how you should look past puberty existed at that point, and wasn't formed after you even discovered you're a human being?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 10:08 PM
3

You're talking about sex. Gender doesn't necessitate particular anatomy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 10:01 PM
4

Should I be obligated to pay for my neighbour's boob job? Furthermore, the whole concept to me validates gender essentialism, and as such I feel trans people in pursuit of their individual happiness, which is of course their right, works against the movement overall.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 08:17 PM
31

She should be a registered sex offender straight up, she did a serious sex crime.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 02:47 PM
3

Why appeal? She wasn't punished at all.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 09:05 AM
9

Number 2, no they're not. Millions of average people in these situations suffer alone, and do nothing wrong in response. The message is clear : Those boys just don't matter. At all. If men are to be treated like human beings by these propagandists, it isn't because they deserve it as equal people, but because a small amount women, real people as per these depictions, may come to harm otherwise. There was a tragedy to depict choosing just an average lonely boy. But because it wasn't happening to …
/r/MensRights04/04/25 08:19 PM
5

Astrology, MBTI, you're frankly insane.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 07:33 AM
3

Probably because for many women sex is about (ab)using power, some feminist theorists even project their view on everyone else.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 02:01 PM
16

Yes, dangling a carrot to the men who fall in line and manage to claw their way to relationships and employment. Men left behind? Fuck em, they're not directly helping a woman already so the feminists can't bring themselves to pretend to give a damn.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 08:15 PM
26

Yeah, a liar offering something will most likely win over people honestly offering plain nothing.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 08:11 PM
12

It is fundamentally against everything a civilized society should stand for.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 03:23 PM
7

Besides, taking drugs is her own responsibility, still a creep.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 03:22 PM
7

It is in a way a replacement or supplement for religion. Less and less people are religious, and most religions provide an easy answer to the obviously apparent unfairness of the world: justice is dispensed before, or after mortal life in some way. But this makes the new agnostic models unstable and difficult to examine, as the world easily seen in it's factual form as injust, callous and unfair isn't part of any cosmology, but the thing itself, and religions never went out their way to sugarcoa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 10:32 AM
8

The internet exist, if you take random pills you aren't really trying, at most taking an impulsive shot at it.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 04:24 PM
2

Why isn't every suicide also counted as one attempt at it? We don't speak of "unsuccessful suicide attempts", so a suicide definitely still is one too.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 04:17 PM
16

Yes, any person of even mediocre intellectual capacity can reliably kill themselves if they want to.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 04:14 PM
6

And if it was, well, men are clearly much superior at it.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 04:11 PM
13

So you're this misandrist white knight trough no choice of your own? If you can't take responsibility debate is fruitless.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 08:37 AM
13

No, it is individual choice to believe in those things. They freely chose to take those existing suggestion as true, in place of ideals of equality because they're bad people.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 08:18 AM
19

Is a woman not responsible for their actions? If they aren't, why are they considered real adult people? You can't have it both ways. Either these women individually are evil as in they do wrong willingly, or they're incapable of being responsible adults.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 07:28 AM
21

The original sin is carried in the Y-promosome.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/25 10:50 AM
48

Even so she immediately reiterates that she won't even slow, nevermind stop her crusade for women's supremacy. Men couldn't even get one full adress of lip service, she's at best planning one step back for a dozen forward.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 09:23 PM
32

Yes, it's a fundamentally objectifying lens to look at men trough, and I don't really stand for that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/25 08:31 PM
13

She didn't go to jail and should have. The document should be outraged about the injustice of the ruling letting this immoral monster walk.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 07:58 AM
1

Bigotry and callousness is an indication of western moral decay, why would they want to sweep it under the rug?
/r/MensRights19/02/25 05:37 PM
6

Don't forget racist.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 08:04 AM
-1

The state is the power of the people. To place religion above it is to surrender to servitude. Humans should be their own masters. No Gods or kings should be heeded, they belong to the darkness of the past with curtailed rights and not believing in the undeniable worth of human beings. As long as god triumphs man, tyranny is considered justified.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/25 10:33 PM
-1

If religion trumps the general rule of law even in one instance, religion is above the state. Therefore the state is a theoracy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/25 08:22 PM
-4

Indeed, too bad all countries are still theoracies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/25 04:55 PM
1

Your honor, the victim was too weak or unwilling to defend themselves and therefore deserved to be killed.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 11:58 AM
2

Former student. So not even in any position of authority at the time.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 10:19 AM
10

The emotionally stunted sex at it again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/25 05:48 PM
19

Falsification of public records is a severe crime, why aren't the agency heads behind bars?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/25 03:16 PM
18

That kind of "A credit to your race/country/social class." is classic leftist bigotry. Another part of it is coddling various minorities, refusing to hold them to the standards of "regular" (native majority) people even in things where they're at little to no disadvantage. Which isn't treating them as quite as capable and intelligent as the majority.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/25 11:55 PM
5

Marginally elected Italian Female Mayors. I live in Finland a country, 5.6 million people where there has unfortunately been an uptick of of politically motivated violence against leaders. We have had two confirmed cases last decade. So, either this is a fluke or somehow attacking politician is as abundant as speeding in Italy for this to have statistical value.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 11:23 AM
3

Well, this view is fundamentally objectification. Men should be helped because it helps other people, not because they're just as important as anyone else.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 11:35 AM
25

It's literally a phrase co-opted from white supremacists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/24 08:27 AM
1

She was found guilty. The other choice was taking away from victims and to prevent justice being done.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 04:48 PM
11

"Have value in the left." And you dare accuse the young men of being selfish.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/24 01:33 AM
7

What is compelling about being a loathed servant over a loathed individual?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/24 01:30 AM
10

Indeed, with the apparent distaste of men actually being, this reeks of flagrant and callous objectification.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/24 01:16 AM
8

Complete and utter objectification, casually promoted by a human rights organisation.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 07:33 PM
8

And they do say men are a violent gender. If so, shouldn't men be the ones getting lighter sentences on the account of the struggle with their nature?
/r/MensRights05/12/24 05:44 PM
5

This is assault too, people have been up to hanged for poisoning others since before Magna Carta, not exactly ground breaking.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 07:14 PM
3

What is the goal of that text besides semantics as an excuse to write three paragraphs of badmouthing men? How is "Don't use real man as a qualifier for people you think are good because I think many of not the majority of men are awful, and that may be inherent to the gender?" a defense of men? Write that kind of text about a racial group and you'll get a sitewide ban for spreading hate towards that demographic.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 02:11 PM
6

That was a defense!? With allies like you..
/r/MensRights17/11/24 12:06 PM
2

You speak professionally despite struggling to write a coherent sentence?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 12:22 AM
13

Hypergamy is already quite a favorable term for the described behavior of cycling men seeking ones of higher wealth and status.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 12:39 PM
1

Those are "aborted attempts" more common amongst men, and unsurprisingly the medical field takes them far less seriously than someone taking near harmless or extremely slow-acting pills, or even making a cut a person literally cannot bleed to death from.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 10:16 PM
1

Attempts are also categorized to minimize those methods. A man standing on a stool fitting on a noose, holding a gun to their head, or climbing to a bridge railing has made and "aborted suicide attempt", callously categorized as less worrying and severe symptoms than even the most ineffectual self-harm. So mentally ill men are minimized by medical practioners, while someone who takes pills that may kill them in 2-3 business weeks if at all, is so damn serious and deserves immediate intensive car…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 10:08 PM
2

It is a weird take from even a feminists angle, are we saying that women are so ineffectual and poor learners that they routinely and repeatedly fail to kill a person who wants to die?
/r/MensRights25/10/24 04:57 PM
22

I was once accused of taking illicit photos at student union party, as I was just tapping away at a Konosuba gacha. For context I was a student union rep who had been organizing, and was responsible for sorting out the venue after, so just about everyone else was shitfaced at that point and the party dying down, I had 3 in the whole evening and was one of the two organizers who could drive, barely got all the crap in the cars and had to check the venue for trash smaller than a mouse by ourselves…
/r/MensRights20/10/24 02:56 PM
2

Forrest never wanted a family? That's an interesting take. And as well established a villain doesn't have to have evil intentions, most don't at least from their point of view. Their actions merely need to clash with the protagonists goals.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 10:56 AM
0

You managed to agree with Villain not being a permanent and dodgedly opposing status, so I don't see how my example failed. You just reinforced my argument.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 08:55 AM
-2

Well, She's definitely and antagonists at least. And her having some reasons and issues, even good ones and major ones don't shield her from being a villain of the story. "The villain" may be too grand, but a villain, sure. It's not like the movie doesn't have any.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 09:45 PM
12

A villain doesn't have to be ever present. Nor even actively work against the protagonist, conflicting agendas are enough. Let's take Star Trek original series. Khan is easy, always opposed to Kirk, he's a villain. Klingons are in competion with the Federation on the final frontiers. But they're not always and unavoidably opposed. Their interests and values just occasionally clash sometimes a little, other times a lot. Are Klingons not villains in the series because they're not always opposed to…
/r/MensRights17/10/24 09:34 PM
5

What's with the spoiler tag? Can't use it properly, or just some trend?
/r/MensRights17/10/24 09:19 PM
37

By this logic any decent villain isn't a villain at all, as they have their reasons.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 09:17 PM
12

Well, left and left, you can only be so left while you believe some people aren't quite worthy of full human rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/24 01:41 AM
17

It is always so nice to be a credit to my gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/24 11:24 PM
6

Teaching, sorry.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 09:58 PM
11

Public statement during a completely unrelated lecture, as told in the article. Airing your mass murder fantasies as teaching is grounds to be barred from the profession for me.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 09:50 PM
0

The first use of male and the second use of female are incorrect. He seems simply too dumb to speak proper English.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 09:47 PM
-6

I object to that. Firstly written word is libel. Secondly even libel has to be false or unjustly unfavourable. Stating that he is a sexist, a true and neutral statement about his attributes couldn't be either.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 09:43 PM
2

"Whilst this is true?" So inhumanity for your cause isn't inhumane? If you need some Lebenstraum human rights can take the backseat?
/r/MensRights11/10/24 07:42 PM
9

This isn't a wild interpretation. It is apparent trough casual objective observation. Human rights aren't negotiable, and "feminists" should get with the program or be rightfully critisized.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 03:38 PM
5

She comes from a completely morally bankrupt and inhuman misandrist position. Maybe she didn't even notice because she is so deeply misandrist, much like you are defending a clearly indefensible statement.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 02:30 PM
7

Irrelevant.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 02:21 PM
10

That you shouldn't shame boys because it is ineffective. You shouldn't shame innocent people because it is morally indefensible to do so. Therefore she isn't willing to recognize that boys are inherently real people who deserve the same respect and human dignity as everyone does. Boys are still an inhuman enemy in this rhetoric, and she's merely calling for a change of tactics. Really, she's saying kill the poor is ineffective therefore we must try something else, completely ignoring the moralit…
/r/MensRights11/10/24 01:51 PM
11

That is completely irrelevant to the conversation though. Demonising a group could be wonderfully effective, but it would still be wrong. Billie Piper here ignores that because she's a misandrist. She's not at all concerned about the method's inhumanity but ineffectiveness, because the boys themselves are irrelevant to her. It is only cold-hearted pragmatism that stands between her an advocating psychological torture.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 10:33 AM
21

She's still a misandrist.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 10:22 AM
87

It's like admonishing torture as an interrogation method because it is ineffective. It should be completely irrelevant whether it is effective, torture shouldn't be an investigation method because it is inhumane, fundamentally wrong. To imply that psychological torture of boys would be acceptable if it was effective for your own goals is still wildly misandrist.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 10:13 AM
14

The thin pink line stands together.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 11:04 PM
25

It's a tragically funny thing when you at least come to the part where people concede men have problems, because then those problems are supposed to be solved by men, mostly individually overcoming any challenge. If you retain that you are fair, yet think men don't deserve help, aren't you saying that you believe that men are so superior to everyone else that they'll easily tackle problems like no one else just can, and thus the playing field is still level? Hardly an inspiring message for me, b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/24 01:58 PM
6

And almost all by stand side by side with bigots and think they're good because they didn't say it themselves.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 11:16 AM
17

Actually, if you want to be reasonable, you can make a very good argument that retirement age should be "Inequal" as trough various, but even major biological factors men have a shorter lifespan and as such can enjoy less retirement at an "Equal" starting point in age. So Poland's retirement age isn't only inequal as a plain number, it gives a 5 year headstart to the gender that is predisposed to have more retirement time anyway.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 11:31 AM
5

Not as such, but really, at the face of it, what else is blaming men now for the wrongs of the past than the completely morally bankrupt axiom of sins of the fathers?
/r/MensRights26/09/24 10:28 PM
20

Original sin, Adam only edition, seems popular with feminists.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 10:08 PM
5

Is 1-3% at most according to studies, hardly seems like some grand patriarchal brotherhood conspiracy, especially when women are more apprehensive of asking for raises.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 07:00 PM
1

Mother is a descriptor, not an honorific. Normalize calling awful people mother, because mothers definitely can be.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 12:11 PM
15

Baseless and inflammatory statements in a court of law are reprimanded? What fascists these judges are. /s
/r/MensRights20/09/24 10:02 PM
7

So mutilating children is more important for you than human rights, good riddance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/24 08:45 AM
8

Aggression or other so called "negative" feelings are also minimized or demonized by associating them with toxic masculinity. There is nothing with being angry when treated injustly. It isn't a crime to be firm in advocating for yourself. It isn't aggressive to merely be in a bad mood on occasion. Men are also sometines actually sad, afraid or anxious, they're not a play emotions to garner sympathy. We are human, and should be allowed live an express human emotions in response to our life. It fe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/24 04:24 PM
7

Yes, rape is normalized behavior when it comes to women wanting children.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 01:29 AM
0

No, a complete sentence, unless it's a man saying it. Seems like the common consensus.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 09:52 AM
3

Plea bargains for this caliber of crime should definitely be abolished. Perhaps of all crime, other countries do just fine. Prosecution shouldn't be able to cover up their inability by using better thugs instead of investigators. But of course in USA prosecution is a career boost as a semi-political office first, a job maybe second, if you're generous.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 09:55 AM
7

The point is that this should go down as first degree murder because that it was. Even if she dies in prison, again women's criminality has been downplayed. Society loses when you accept lies as truth, it was first degree. She was a cold-blooded monster who killed a defenseless person with malice aforethought, not someone who was driven to a desperate act.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 09:40 AM
15

An open and shut case of first degree murder and she could still walk free eventually, priviledge still at work.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 08:13 AM
20

Taxes at work perpetuating misandry. Just like the patriarchy intended. /s
/r/MensRights16/08/24 11:08 AM
94

Maybe tell your next partner that you're a prostitute as well.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 06:19 PM
13

Like just publicly voicing personal opinions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/24 07:40 PM
3

No it doesn't, bigot.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:25 AM
27

Please bring one topic with some clear thoughts on it per post, that's how the sub works. Your own absolution is an incredibly selfish, irrelevant and narrowminded umbrella to discuss anything under. It's frankly offensive how highly you think of yourself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 01:14 PM
4

That seems like a very sudden, unlikely and inefficient attempt at suicide.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 12:16 AM
13

Inclusivity about them and people with mental ailments, now used to harass people that don't go lockstep with their views, included many of those with mental ailments who may at times be odd, reclusive or rigid, which are of course clear indications of barely repressed urges to rape and kill all women around them, and as such they must be removed from any public place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 07:28 PM
27

I wonder why these don't move on to summary dismissal. The evidence is unassailable and undebateable, the claim is false.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 01:12 PM
1

Doesn't matter. There's no justification.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 06:29 AM
1

Trump is worse but he's not trying to be some pillar of decency. With Trump you get and old-fashioned curmudgeon autocrat who has defined his goals. With Kamala you get a mystery baggage old-fashioned autocrat in a thin foil of decency.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 05:24 AM
97

My brother is a nurse than the older women in his workplace routinely make inappropriate comments of sexual nature of students and young male personnel, presumably of him too when he's elsewhere. His coworkers and superior just ridiculed him when he pointed our the blatant sexual harassment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 08:34 AM
16

But it is just a male majority working there. Domination implies great power that surely isn't anyone's to command just by collecting a paycheck. "Female-dominated" fields like nursing have various issues feminists are quick to point out, as there's clearly no "domination" by workers going on, while male fields are often excused of help by society because of supposed real great power to dictate their work, domination.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 07:29 AM
2

7'9 places you on the short list of the tallest people ever, and top 10 of living people. 20 with the leeway. Like come on, make your lies a bit more believable.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 05:05 PM
37

"You can't mutilate children" would be much firmer moral ground to stand on than "You can only mutilate male children and just in this particular way". But no, modern "secular" society has to let some break various established rules, placing them and their belief above anyone else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 06:11 PM
1

Trepanation is a reduction to absurb. That is obvious. Clearly you're too full to converse with further.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:57 PM
1

So, maybe trepanation works, no one knows or cares in psych? "No standard" as psych operates is too low. Shopping around means practioners have close to no idea what they are doing and what would be good for the patient.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:42 PM
0

Those people are considered competent, and the patient has just failed "shopping around" for quack with a nice vibe. That's at the core. "Shopping around" as a standard proves that psychologists are on average far from competent medical practioners applying scientifically backed treatment.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:23 PM
-1

A competent cardiologist won't misdiagnose and mistreat your issue, do expensive and invasive tests, wait until you yourself realize they're incompetent and then have not the foggiest on who could actually help you. In psychology that's monday, tuesday, thursday and friday. Repeated a few time you have a typical psychology experiences. And if you try to complain, well that's just the level of care required from practioners, in fact all of them are decorated in their field. And since cardiology i…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 07:54 AM
4

And that's why charity tax exemptions are unethical. If you want use money to your own ends, pay taxes first like everyone else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/24 07:40 AM
6

Where does it transform to an attempt at suicide? I mean if you have shotgun in mouth, finger on the trigger, you're closer to irreversible death than hours after you've taken many medicines that will eventually kill you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 09:57 AM
6

A credit to his race and sex, how progressive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/24 06:36 PM
6

He's not hurting for money and doesn't give it away, is this an admission?
/r/MensRights13/07/24 11:51 AM
3

A credit to your sex, are you? Keep it up son! /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/24 08:37 PM
23

Poor little helpless children. And onto other matters, women are automatically as or more capable than any man and deserve the jobs with most pay, prestige and RESPONSIBILITY.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 09:25 PM
12

Sins of the fathers isn't a doctrine of justice, but of cruelty, tyranny and punishing the innocent. Simply put, plain evil.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 12:50 PM
9

Enjoy joining the forever banned.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 12:49 PM
12

While I've luckily never been threatened with weapons accidents have taught me that curiously my maleness provides absolutely no special resistance to slashing or piercing wounds. Hell, anyone over 10 can swing a hammer hard enough to kill anyone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/24 10:45 PM
8

They chose a flattering picture for Heather Hare, convicted rapist.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 10:09 PM
1

Moreover you would be wrong. It certainly at least did. But it doesn't and didn't make any of it any less morally abhorrent. Or this. What if it did make women safer? It still wouldn't be right or defensible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/24 10:16 AM
3

I get you and agree, we seemed have a misunderstanding here where I was as different state of conversation, my bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/24 07:16 PM
1

I'm sorry that happened to you and the wrongness of this act was never in question, "unwanted physical contact" and the sexual manner is really a textbook case. Yet surely you think your experience would be misleading to be associated as truly equivalent to his experience presumably as an adult?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/24 06:10 PM
2

Can we use i**el here?, they definitely would.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/24 05:36 PM
-1

The law says the Arkansas state sales tax is 6.50%. Is this some deep philosophical and scientific truth because it is law? Does science and philosophy change if it is 6.75% next year?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/24 05:26 PM
1

And that makes it assault and battery.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/20 09:34 PM
2

Textbook assault and battery with no consequence to it.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/20 09:33 PM
-9

Well not more wrong than most of the stuff that gets to the top in here.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/20 07:53 AM
4

Human trafficker literally means "slaver".
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/19 08:35 AM
42

What gives you such sympathy for slavers? Could execute her for that and it wouldn't be out of line.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/19 11:35 PM
15

Well you know, parasites usually recognize they're unwanted and try to avoid detection as such.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/19 08:34 PM
3

Hey, I got the last one too.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/19 04:42 PM
6

Stabbed with stiletto as in the shoe, not the knife.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/19 01:46 PM
7

Tried to kill him, not just attack.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 01:45 PM
2

Or, as she's doing, retreating to an establishment with civilians inside.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/18 10:29 AM
1

Yeah, don't need much force to bash a persons skull in, or break bones, the woman doesn't even seem impaired so entering to close range to only remotely safe option for the officer is his gun, to that end tasing was the safest choice for all.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/18 10:27 AM
2

Quick? She already was taking steps back inside, he either tased her safely at that moment or she escapes inside, possibly hurting someone there, and as he then would have to have been forced to closer range combat he'd have to switch to a more lethal weapon, as he'd be in grave danger missing with the taser, tasing was the best option after what she did.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/18 10:23 AM
1

True, you have to be extremely rich or have connections to do crime without punishment.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/18 10:14 AM
7

Indeed as a worker you're selling labour as a product, obviously any market can't work if you don't have information on the price of labour in the market.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 02:34 PM
2

Apparently historical equestrian statues are offending women, as horses symbolize power and there's only equestrian statues of men.
/r/MGTOW28/05/17 09:49 AM
7

"Finally someone I can talk to about these damn leeches!" "And what's on your mi waitaminute."
/r/MGTOW07/04/17 06:14 AM
1

Typical mom: eh, 2 out of 3 will do.
/r/MGTOW07/04/17 05:53 AM
8

Cold blooded murder on a completely helpless person, any man would be in death row.
/r/MGTOW05/04/17 10:51 AM
18

Women understand women and they hate each other.
/r/MGTOW05/04/17 10:12 AM
2

Classic juxtaposition with the trees, and women's perfume names were apparently all invented by 54.
/r/MGTOW20/03/17 09:35 AM
1

So why then as a guy I get called and old soul just for having a gloomy outlook on life?
/r/MGTOW16/03/17 08:21 PM
1

You know, if he's depressed the family can't be described as happy, it casts him as superfluous.
/r/MGTOW16/03/17 07:49 PM
3

Maybe children should be kept separate from criminals?
/r/MGTOW16/03/17 07:42 PM
1

My wallet does have supple skin and holds my important stuff.
/r/MGTOW16/03/17 07:27 PM
1

Siddhartha Gautama was a prince and yet the most relatable central figure of major religions, he wasn't that special, made mistakes and achieved his goal himself, not by being chosen by some god.
/r/MGTOW16/03/17 06:41 PM
1

By the way, have you noticed that women, if they're fat are often wholly so, while a lot of "fat" men have a little belly, comparatively nothing?
/r/MGTOW16/03/17 06:34 PM
2

And the fetus.
/r/MGTOW16/03/17 06:30 PM
2

Yeah, on the other hand don't most places ration those degrees pretty well?
/r/MGTOW16/03/17 06:26 PM
3

I don't quite get your point, by my cursory research it's a legimate field of study, though choices of application are narrow.
/r/MGTOW16/03/17 06:16 PM
6

Turn? Does she live in a monarchy?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 10:41 AM
8

Hillary seemed quite serious about it, and often.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 10:37 AM
1

Well "attractive" kind of implies that.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 11:00 PM
12

This knife is like tenth of his size, it can't hurt him.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 10:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter