TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Gatorcommune Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by Gatorcommune on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's stupid anyway, if your sexual attraction to somebody is dictated by the money they spend on you then it's not really the person you are dating.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 02:56 PM
3

Yeah but she is only asking them to pay for the popcorn, not the ticket. The principle is clear, pay for a small percentage of the cost of the date.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 11:35 PM
0

Once again, exactly what has she done to show her appreciation of him? Offered him the possibility of sleeping with her.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 11:34 PM
2

I work in childcare and honestly I'm not sure there is anything stopping anybody from going into it, most programs I'm involved in are chronically understaffed. I think if the pay was more decent it would attract more male candidates, but as it stands there just isn't much male interest.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 11:32 PM
3

Most of the girls I know who like 'jerks' are pretty tough themselves and need somebody to give as good as they get. Just my experience but I have seen a few girls completely piledrive through sensitive guy types because they though that was what they wanted only to find themselves in a working relationship with somebody they considered a complete jerk at one point (and is in fact a jerk). I think we all just have different standards for these kinds of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 11:17 AM
1

I was more thinking 'getting girls in the door'.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 03:42 AM
1

Can't see any self interested reason a bar would do that./s
/r/MensRights05/07/15 11:07 PM
2

Also these girls have accused a guy of rape. They aren't being randomly targeted, their claim is under scrutiny. The defense can only subpoena records relevant to the case. This is exactly what the girls asked for, somebody to look into their rape claims.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 02:36 AM
1

Anyway, I'm just explaining how discovery works here. I'd obviously have to see the discovery requests to actually comment on its validity. Agreed. I do believe there is a reasonable request there though, lawyers getting greedy aside.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 03:54 PM
1

Perhaps the most salient point for new attorneys to take away from this discussion is: If a discovery request is so broad that the propounders cannot articulate what they seek from the other side or that the only thing they could discover would be additional causes of action, then the request constitutes a fishing expedition In this case they both know what they are looking for and have some evidence to go on already. Doesn't really seem like it fits the objection.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 03:29 PM
1

I don't have access to read this beyond the first page, could you explain why this is deemed a fishing exposition and whose privacy we are protecting?
/r/MensRights14/06/15 02:18 PM
2

I'm not sure the legal line between a 'fishing expedition' and following up on evidence. But it seems to me that this is not searching without a reason. And correct me if I'm wrong but how can you go on a fishing expedition on somebodies defense? Usually the point of fishing expedition is to find something where you have nothing, here you have an allegation first and foremost. Shouldn't the defendant be able to bring anything that would be relevant to his defense?
/r/MensRights14/06/15 11:32 AM
6

The messages you mentioned sounded pretty suspicious. It would certainly incline me to want to read the rest of the messages, which I think is the exact goal of the defense. Why they haven't just gotten a subpoena is beyond me.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 12:14 AM
4

yeah but fuck living there.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 09:13 AM
7

Side effect of patriarchy. Maybe call it benevolentspreading. It will TOTALLY get solved automatically once we get rid of manspreading and the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 09:12 AM
1

The view from my desk: most hair stylists and barbers do just that If they do they are breaking the law. You might disagree but these laws aren't built with the freedom of businesses in mind. It's the freedom of individual customers to have access to goods and services that is important. Not a business owners 'right' to turn away customers. and should bear the responsibility for the outcomes of their beliefs. In this case it would be a discrimination lawsuit.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:04 PM
3

They don't have a right to be jerks that discriminate based on race or gender.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter