TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GearedCam Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by GearedCam on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It goes the same for racial matters. Someone can randomly call something racist, but because I disagree with facts supporting my stance I'm racist now? It's such a bad joke because it's true.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 06:15 PM
31

Disagreement is a form of violence/harassment/bullying apparently.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 08:06 PM
1

Got some real left-wingers modding r/interestingasfuck. I got banned for following r/mensrights. Their message as to why was just that, and went on to say and/or taking part in subreddits that practice brigading or some shit. I didn't realize that was a requirement here....
/r/MensRights16/06/26 08:04 PM
1

Oh boy, or maybe add in the dude is an ICE agent. The Blue Hairs would be frothing at the mouth.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 03:23 AM
76

The 90 days in jail is a joke, and so is the drug/alcohol testing. She'll worm her way out of that somehow. I'm sure she'll get off the registered list quicker than the minimum 15 year stay.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 01:05 AM
9

The left in general looks for victims to cater to, and a villain to blame. If you point out that there is no bad guy or that they're objectively incorrect, YOU are actually the villain because you were mean or something to that effect. Every single important topic they fight for applies.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 02:23 PM
3

187ml is roughly 6oz to us Yanks. That's like 3 strong beers. Like I read in later comments...fuck off, ya Cunt.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 02:19 PM
21

And conflating hypocrisy with misandry/misogyny
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:54 PM
3

They're loaded questions by design in order to garner attention, however illogical it is. The spirit of those gets the responder to answer a certain way, set up with the grouping of a man with a huge wild animal, as if to say, well if a man is being compared with a grizzly they must be equally dangerous. Not to mention, the only people that get any attention are the ones with dumb answers, like oh I'd definitely feel safer with the bear. When I hear this crap I feel like Dan Akroyd in that old S…
/r/MensRights05/06/24 01:46 AM
8

well, aktually men are more dangerous than bears! This poor woman has obviously been scarred by a man in the past! We must help her!
/r/MensRights07/05/24 10:37 PM
1

Wow...dude is sick for attention
/r/MensRights02/05/24 02:36 PM
12

WEIRD! lol
/r/MensRights16/12/22 05:11 PM
6

I'm generally like working with my hands on stuff around the house, my cars, yard, etc. I always like tools. One can never have enough. Tools make self-reliance easier.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 03:56 PM
4

It's become acceptable for someone to criticize others unfairly as long as it's under the guise that person is doing it from a position of weakness.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 07:30 PM
1

Thank goodness you're here to let me know and explain it so eloquently. I understand now.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 02:49 AM
-1

It’s still assault even if the victim doesn’t come out traumatized. That's a black and white statement right there. That's the logic I'm criticizing. What if a person slaps another on the back after a good joke? That's hitting another person, so it must be physical assault. That would never get anyone arrested, but that's the logic applied to the gif above. Everyone acts like assault is assault and should be enforced so.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 03:54 PM
-3

I'm not saying that. I'm pointing out that true victims of assault feel violated and sometimes scarred by the experience. Do you think that was the case here? He doesn't appear to frightened or affected by her. It just seems people just look for anything to point at and name assault just because it might fit a dictionary definition. Now if she was just wailing away on him repeatedly, that's a different story. There's always context applicable that a definition doesn't cover.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 03:46 PM
-13

Physical assault is not a black-and-white, it is or it isn't deal. She hit him with her purse but come on...does anyone one of us think he's scarred by this? Eagerly looking for situations to assign the abuse label to females does not solve the problem of people actually abusing each other.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 11:35 AM
10

That sounds believable in the Twitter world considering current events, but until Mr. Lloyd comes out with a source to verify I can't believe it. I'm still boycotting P&G anyway. Shame, I loved their razors.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 04:53 PM
1

I'm just speculating to show that I think a reasonable compensation should be given to the guy, rather than throwing a bunch of money at him. Given no responsibilities, people usually take none.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:14 PM
1

I don't think it's right to set him up to never have to work again. That's just setting someone up to fail. What motivation would he ever have to make something of himself? Some people naturally have the drive even if they have a million bucks in the bank. Some don't when they have $20. Look at what most lottery winners do after they win. Money is gone in no time. I'd say it would be more reasonable to take an average American's salary that's been with the same company for 23 years (assuming he …
/r/MensRights06/01/19 07:07 AM
1

Anyone ever notice extremists always believe two wrongs = right?
/r/MensRights17/09/18 12:08 AM
1

If your content were obviously fantasy and made up, e.g. "I like lizard skin boots because I myself am a lizard" it's obvious you may be speaking sarcastically. But there are people who truly believe that being the subject of racism does not apply to white people. It's the same with "...but the earth is flat". Since there are quite a number of people that actually believe that, there is no sarcasm implied despite how stupid it sounds.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 08:21 PM
2

On a related note, I was talking to some female coworkers (had to tread very lightly lol) about the whole Tiger Woods thing as it was going on, and the women were commenting on how much money she was getting out of the divorce. I asked them why they thought it was so justified for Tiger's ex to ask for so much money out of what he had just to take care of her kids when she didn't even directly do it herself (nanny). They all had the same type of "keeping up the lifestyle" type answer. Which I th…
/r/MensRights26/07/18 01:41 PM
4

Will I be downvoted for a gollyma...GOLLYMA SHUCK-TI-DAY!!
/r/MensRights26/07/18 01:20 PM
14

That's the crazy thing; it's a verbatim quote from him about being afraid to initiate a new relationship. No imagery or euphemisms to blur what he's saying. Yet the one tweeter that didn't do her reading comprehension homework gets a bunch of retweets. I think if more people critically thought about ideals they choose to follow they wouldn't be so likely to follow the herd.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 03:06 AM
1

Racist and sexist. That's new.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 12:54 PM
67

I thought this little tidbit at the beginning was refreshing, coming from a feminist: "I get extremely angry when I come across articles that insist there are gender differences that extend beyond physiology." What else is there really? Our brains behave much differently than womens'; this is a fact. That difference in physiology affects every single mental aspect of a woman, so why would feminists ever ignore that? Are we supposed to believe the reason women feel/act different is because of som…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 04:44 PM
6

They need to put body cams on all officers. I bet the guy didn't even have his hand on his weapon and the officer just unloads his whole mag. Sheesh.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter