TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Gemwriter2 Archive

View 5 posts and 40 comments by Gemwriter2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The rape is how the book is advertised and the main thing in the blurb, even though it was only one topic. However, the protagonist feels guilty about doing it and insists that it be defined properly. Nonetheless, if Vaudeville Clown is sensitive, then it stands to reason that he would object strongly to it being depicted at all.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 09:08 PM
1

There is subjectivity in this topic. Rapeseed by Nancy Freund includes the depiction of the protagonist raping her sister's boyfriend, but it is definitely acknowledged as being rape. Even so, if Vaudeville Clown is very sensitive, he might have been upset that it was depicted at all.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 11:45 AM
1

No I didn't. That was Vaudeville Clown.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 11:10 AM
1

In the thread I posted on the askfeminists subreddit, more than half the responses, including the moderator, took the view that criticism of a feminist author is unacceptable and unwelcome no matter what. This raises the separate question, could that particular double standard that is common among feminists add to rape culture? Certainly it's the reason why Chollet feels secure in her rape apology. If you have time to review my post in the askfeminists sub, consider how differently their respons…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 10:48 AM
2

Lots of amateurs online do. As to which actual published, award winning authors do, I will have to get back to you on that one if I find any.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 10:41 AM
1

Leftwingmaleasvocates is a sub for leftists who are not feminists.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 08:10 AM
3

Mona Chollet's commentary on Colette is worse still. The passage from Chollet's book that I am referring to is from page 190-191 and it reveals Mona's opinion on Colette's sexual abuse of her 16 year old stepson. This is how Mona writes about it: "However you read her books, things fell out much less tragically in Colette's personal life. A little before she turned fifty, she began a relationship with Bertrand de Jouvenal, her husband's seventeen-year-old son... (Colette) remained fully herself,…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 08:17 PM
2

If you wish to show your friends the passage, you will have to get a copy of the book from your library. I am not able to upload and disseminate the book online. Copyright is a barrier! The passage I am referring to is from page 190-191 and covers Colette's sexual abuse of her 16 year old stepson. This is how Mona writes about it: "However you read her books, things fell out much less tragically in Colette's personal life. A little before she turned fifty, she began a relationship with Bertrand …
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:16 PM
10

I have actually read Mona Chollet's whole book which is how I can reference the page numbers. The passage I am referring to is from page 190-191 and covers Colette's sexual abuse of her 16 year old stepson. This is how Mona writes about it: "However you read her books, things fell out much less tragically in Colette's personal life. A little before she turned fifty, she began a relationship with Bertrand de Jouvenal, her husband's seventeen-year-old son... (Colette) remained fully herself, in po…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 11:36 AM
18

https://www.shondaland.com/inspire/books/a23106497/the-many-faces-of-colette/ About the author Colette. You have to scroll down and it mentions how she sexually abused her sixteen year old stepson. Nearing 50, Colette showed no signs of slowing down, even pursuing a sexual relationship with her 16-year-old stepson under her husband’s nose for five years before it was discovered. << I don't think I'm allowed to reproduce/ upload Chollet's book online - copyright is a thing! You may be able to get…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 11:27 AM
1

Yes, remember Kellogg's words about inflicting circumcision on boys to stop them masturbating? Dr. John Kellogg Invented Cereal. Some of His Other Wellness Ideas Were Much Weirder | HISTORY "...he recommended circumcision without anesthetic—"as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind,” he wrote in his book, Plain Facts for Old and Young. Kellogg had an even more gruesome set of treatments for girls, including the application of pure carbolic acid to the c…
/r/MensRights12/04/24 06:58 PM
2

The point was that the studies are not credible if the people carrying them out included doctors from circumcising religions. My second point may not be comforting, but it can be observed that some doctors who are circumcised men may show a neurotic need to justify the procedure.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 11:54 PM
6

I am a circumcised man. For your information, the procedure definitely affects a man's ability to feel down there, it's just that the male organ can still deposit sperm whether or not a man can feel down there (there are lots of possible routes to orgasm).
/r/MensRights11/04/24 11:45 PM
3

Some medical professionals believe Rabbis about the procedure and want to prove the Rabbis right (Rabbis say the procedure is healthy). Some doctors who are circumcised men show a psychological need to justify the procedure, and have invented/exaggerated benefits for the procedure before.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 11:39 PM
4

Male circumcision was used in the 19th century by your medical institutions to deliberately torture boys, along with such procedures as severing the dorsal nerve and attaching needles to the foreskin. The difference is that male circumcision is sacred to certain religions and the followers of the religions see the medical institutions as a way to proselytise for the procedure. The idea that circumcision is healthy/brings benefits is a Rabbinic view of the procedure. My reaction to a man getting …
/r/MensRights11/04/24 11:32 PM
1

Men who hate men kill a lot of boys and men. Take Gacy and Dahmer as prime examples. Women who hate men don't kill as many boys and men as misandrist men do, but it still happens on occasion. And there are cases of women who abuse boys because they are motivated by feelings of hatred and disgust towards men. Don't any of you ever research cases of male victims of abuse? Some of them were sexually abused as boys by women who hated men and took it out on boys.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 10:24 AM
2

Men cannot be ableist?? I don't think so! I am an autistic man and I worked for five years in an environment where all my colleagues were women and most of them were kind to me.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 10:27 AM
1

Actually there are a lot of muslims in Europe. They circumcise.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 08:53 AM
1

Male circumcision in America was caused by religious activists infesting the medical institutions. First the Puritanical Christians who also used such procedures as severing the dorsal nerve and attaching needles to the foreskins of boys to sexually harm them. And then why did the medical institutions make circumcision a routine when they dropped severing the dorsal nerve and attaching needles to the foreskin? Because male circumcision is sacred to a different Abrahamic religion and a number of …
/r/MensRights30/11/23 08:51 AM
2

They're not being brave or tolerant with their reticence, but they are being smart. It's about self-preservation. If MRAs are too terrified to criticise one religion, even when that religion is at its core opposed to the rights of boys and men (on a number of issues) why should the feminists be bold?
/r/MensRights14/11/23 12:16 PM
6

I am circumcised - neonatal circumcision is a hideous violation of human rights and destroys an important part of the anatomy. In the US it was first used as a form of deliberate injury to stop boys masturbating, along with such procedures as severing the dorsal nerve and attaching needles to the foreskin. So why did they make circumcision a routine when they dropped and pretended to forget about severing the dorsal nerve and attaching needles to the foreskin? The different factors that come int…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 09:31 PM
1

If we're talking in the very broad sense, then Jane Powell, the founder of CALM. She certainly has done a lot of work to help men suffering from mental illness.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 12:01 AM
3

The prepuceplasty has been used to fix tight foreskins on continental Europe for a century. But in the English speaking countries where there are histories of genital cutting being routine, most surgeons still just use circumcision to treat any anomaly of the foreskin.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 08:51 AM
1

It was almost certainly fixable with a prepuceplasty.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:40 AM
1

The procedure is sacred to certain religions and some doctors are religious activists for those religions first, and doctors second. Other forms of male genital mutilation e.g. severing the dorsal nerve and attaching needles to the foreskin are not sacred to those religions, so even the American medical institutions dropped those two procedures. Reason number two - some of the doctors who were men circumcised in infancy exhibit a psychological need to justify the procedure.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 11:51 AM
0

Straight man here. May I make please make an observation? Here it is: Really? Do you know of Alison Tieman? She's a woman and a fierce advocate for men's rights. Dr Helen Smith? Likewise. She's how I first knew there is a men's rights movement. And plenty of other women care about injustices that men have to contend with. And the greatest enemies of men's rights are all too often men themselves.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 08:18 PM
1

I agree too!
/r/MensRights08/07/23 08:08 PM
1

Regarding MGM and homophobia, our real enemies are activists from Abrahamic religions. Are you American? Remember the Puritanical Christian attempts by the medical institutions to suppress male sexuality with different forms of genital mutilation such as severing the dorsal nerve, attaching needles to the foreskin and male circumcision? And why did the medical institutions make circumcision an actual routine when they dropped and pretended to forget severing the dorsal nerve and attaching needle…
/r/MensRights08/07/23 08:02 PM
1

Some doctors who are circumcised men show a neurotic need to invent justifications for the procedure. Apart from the doctors who follow circumcising religions, the only fierce proponents of the practice are doctors who were circumcised themselves. The first doctors to claim that the procedure had hygiene benefits were doctors who followed a certain religion and also doctors who were circumcised as boys in the 19th century when it was used as a "cure" for masturbation. This ought to be very telli…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 09:11 AM
1

The idea that the procedure brings medical benefits is a rabbinical view. They're not exactly secretive about it. Which types of doctors are strong proponents of the procedure? First and foremost, doctors who follow circumcising religions. Their bias is obvious. Their views are informed by their religions. Second and to a lesser extent - some doctors who were men circumcised in infancy may show a neurotic need to find justifications for the procedure, which just shows that the procedure carries …
/r/MensRights02/07/23 11:28 AM
1

At least the religious activists in question are not using the continental European medical institutions to proselytise for the procedure. That level of capitulation would be worse than cowardly.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 11:12 AM
2

https://youtu.be/wonGg8d4ASA Cruel World Happy Mind is a woman and a YouTuber and she is most certainly not pleased that Ballinger is getting away with predatory behaviour. Check out her in depth documentary via the link above.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 12:17 PM
1

The mid 20th century prevalence was due to the procedure being special to one religion and some doctors being religious activists first and doctors second. Let's not kid ourselves. As great as it would be to pay the medical institutions out for their history of quackery, the issue of male circumcision is linked to a much bigger topic - that of religion.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 07:34 PM
3

But the American medical institutions would not be proselytising for the procedure if it were not special to one religion. Remember they dropped and pretended to forget about severing the dorsal nerve and attaching needles to the foreskin etc. which are not special to one religion. The effect of one type of religious acrivist abusing the medical institutions in this way has certainly had startling effects in spreading the practice very far outside their religion - so even parents who have antith…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 05:48 PM
3

The one reason that male circumcision - destroying the prepuce - is still allowed at all in the English speaking countries is because it is sacred to certain religions. Even in the United States. the doctors would have dropped and pretended to forget about male circumcision if it were not special to one religion. In the 19th century it was one of the milder punishments for boys who masturbated - others including severing the dorsal nerve and attaching needles to the foreskin. The medical institu…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 05:42 PM
2

Yes, the KAM hashtag is chilling. Look how this feminist writer tries to trivialise it while covering the news story of Polina Dvorkina - Russian radfem who plotted to carry out a mass shooting at a nursery school! https://www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/2022/04/06/russian-woman-planned-to-kill-boys-at-a-kindergarten-but-was-stopped-by-teachers-before-firing-a-shot/comment-page-1/#comments And yet the author of the article comments: >>"the hashtag #K***AllMen is a not-so-great joke, not a statement o…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/06/23 04:41 PM
2

With male circumcision - specifically the procedure that destroys the prepuce - there are different factors that complicate the topic. Most importantly, the process is sacred to certain religions and some doctors are religious activists first and doctors second. So in Britain there's a really weird polarising in the medical community. First, it is officially acknowledged that a man circumcised in infancy may become angry and frustrated as a result and it is possible for a man affected in this wa…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/04/23 09:48 AM
1

She said it was the calls Childline received - 20% of the boys who were suffering SA were abused by women and 4% of the girls.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/04/23 05:49 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/EverydayMisandry18/04/23 03:45 PM
1

Are you in the US? There are different factors that come into play. First and most important, the results of the procedure are special to a religious paradigm and some doctors are religious activists first and doctors second. Then there is the fact that some circumcised doctors exhibit a psychological need to justify the procedure which is evidence that it carries psychological risks. The procedure is treated differently to all the other 19th century practices of genital cutting (which included …
/r/EverydayMisandry18/04/23 03:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter