TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Generic-username427 Archive

View 0 posts and 77 comments by Generic-username427 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

Internet historian is an absolute gem of a youtuber
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/20 08:34 PM
2

Also a much watch for practical effect nuts, that movie is literally a wet dream for that shit
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/19 12:00 AM
1

I believe you are correct and battery is the charge for when a physical attack is carried out
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/19 06:39 PM
3

Lol that's what I want to know, like why not use masterchief?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/18 02:22 AM
13

Yeah, and that lady has the audacity to say this guy should apologize to her. God damn is this woman arrogant
/r/MensRights19/07/18 11:50 AM
4

It's the fate that all niche subs are doomed to follow
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/18 05:37 PM
0

I wouldn't go as far as to say the left as a whole desires that, there are nut jobs on both sides
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:12 PM
2

You actually sound retarded if that's what you think most southerners are like
/r/MensRights18/05/18 05:29 PM
14

Ok fella, getting a little too red pilly, plenty of women are legit fans of this stuff,
/r/MensRights13/05/18 12:41 AM
5

Always happy to make others happy
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/18 09:59 PM
119

As is tradition
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/18 06:16 PM
3

Lol that's the reaction I had when I first heard about this gun, it's absolutely absurd
/r/MensRights21/02/18 02:11 AM
3

As impractical as it is I thought the thundergun was the most powerful handgun in the world http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/02/10/50-bmg-single-shot-handgun/
/r/MensRights21/02/18 01:36 AM
1

my guess is you're making a dirty hairy reference, but the .44 magnum is not the most powerful handgun in the world
/r/MensRights21/02/18 01:34 AM
1

I hear those are good aphrodisiacs
/r/MensRights20/01/18 02:37 AM
1

You do understand that free speech is different from speech that incites violence. If the motherfuckers we're talking about are actually organizing people and telling them to kill people then they need to be arrested, Just thought I should make that clear. By the way I'm a full supporter of that quote, because as much as I disagree with your viewpoints you have every right to have them and share them with the public
/r/MensRights14/12/17 09:40 PM
1

While I never think they will ever achieve the numbers necessary to have a political platform, the best way to keep them from getting members is to stop demonizing everyone with a conservative mindset. Seriously this is what caused Trump to win the election and if it keeps happening it will cause more and more conservatives to feel threatened to the point where the only option they see available to them is the extremism that is fascism
/r/MensRights14/12/17 09:38 PM
1

Hating Nazis is understandable and something I actually agree with, but until they break laws or behave in terroristic way they have the right of assembly. I do think however the concerns leveled at the threat of neo Nazis are significantly blown out of proportion, cause there aren't many of them
/r/MensRights14/12/17 09:34 PM
1

You are correct, that's why they're terrorists, because they use violence instead of words to achieve their political views
/r/MensRights14/12/17 05:35 PM
1

Pretty sure most conservatives would be against Nazism, like I know it's popular to hate on republicans cause they tend to be assholes but come on man you don't actually think the average Republican would even tolerate the idea of a Nazi holding power in their party do you? That'd be like me asking you what'd you do if the democrats elected a fucking Soviet, that shit ain't happening
/r/MensRights14/12/17 05:34 PM
1

By virtue of the first amendment, which allows for both the freedom of speech and the freedom of assembly there is no action that could taken against the scenario you just described that could be considered constitutional. The problem with deciding what is and is not ok to say resides in who makes the decision. As soon as there is precedent of censorship in the US whichever party that is in power will seek to use it as a means to strengthen their standings while discrediting those with opposing …
/r/MensRights14/12/17 05:23 PM
1

Violence done by the right has more often then not been perpetrated by the KKK and because of that they are rightfully defined as a terrorist organization. Therefore it stands to reason that a reactionary group using the same tactics would also be classified as a terrorist organization. As for the right using antagonistic tactics to bait antifa members into violence, the left has done that as well, when they sent dozens of people to Trump rallies with the intent to antagonize violence. A lot of …
/r/MensRights14/12/17 05:06 PM
1

A leg to stand on, are you joking, terrorism, as defined by the department of homeland security is "the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims" which is what antifa is doing. They're political ideology is a mix of communism and socialism with a hatred for fascism and they willingly use unlawful violence against those with opposing viewpoints, that makes them terrorists, end of story. The 11 thing was just me making fun of how rid…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 04:12 PM
1

How the hell do you ever expect anyone to listen to your political views when you proudly flaunt a complete lack of mathematical understanding, there is no scenario where two 1's placed next to each other without a space or arithmitic sign between them will be viewed as anything other then an 11. This is basic fucking stuff kid, and doing it right makes a hell of difference in terms of legibility, just something to think about.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 09:11 AM
2

Did you just use 11 to denote the two in WWII instead of the accepted standard of using two capital I's or you know, just using the number 2?
/r/MensRights14/12/17 02:01 AM
4

No, antifa is a group of people that use fear and violence to achieve political goals, which interestingly enough makes them terrorists
/r/MensRights13/12/17 04:56 PM
0

Us vs them is the wrong mentality here, and did you just try to discredit Martin Luther kings message by saying his death proved it wrong? Cause that's like the opposite of what it proved
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:24 AM
5

Love that saying, "A man who has arrived at position through means other then logic and reason cannot be expected to move from that position by logical means"
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:12 PM
1

Don't be self righteous when you're correct about an argument, it proves their point
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:03 PM
3

Firstly you need to have a u/ before the username, and secondly it's all uppercase. If you're gonna try and insult someone at least have the self-respect to properly address them, isn't that right u/PIG_CUNT
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:02 PM
2

Did you seriously just retype his comment to give yourself a compliment, cause regardless of the current conversation, that's just sad
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:57 PM
6

You're welcome, keep on keeping on
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:55 PM
2

In law making a claim without proof is called an "unsubstantiated claim" and is thusly thrown out, so unless you can prove your point, why should I consider it?
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:51 PM
4

I wonder just how this'll be taken out of context to promote an opposing viewpoint
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:48 PM
2

So do you also consider 3rd wave feminism preaching the notion the men should be taught not to rape also a stupid thing to say?
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:36 PM
5

Mock*
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:27 PM
5

If I remember correctly, one of the greatest leaders of equal civil rights believed that if what you are fighting for is truly a just cause, then you should act the part and be a better person then those that would oppose your cause. If we behave as 3rd wave feminists do then how are we any better?
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:26 PM
7

This is completely correct and also very well worded, you're a solid writer
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:22 PM
7

I always call people on it cause all that sort of shit does is make us more like what feminism became, a group of people that think you achieve equality by belittling others
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:19 PM
4

That's a bold move Kenobi, let's see how it plays out
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/17 04:29 PM
5

They crave power over others and protection from backlash, I'm starting to realize that it really isn't the idea of feminism that's to blame, it's the people who want power without the responsibility that comes along with it, so they just move and occupy a movement that affords them protection. This is my best guess at least
/r/MensRights21/11/17 05:46 PM
4

Hey being a terrible person to people is ok when they don't agree with you
/r/MensRights13/11/17 06:29 PM
4

If this is how things went then nothing he did was really wrong, innappropriate certainly, but not necessarily wrong. EDIT: when I use the word wrong I mean in the legal sense
/r/MensRights09/11/17 10:02 PM
21

Well yeah, cause they, you know, actually caused it to happen
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/17 01:08 AM
36

They sent you back?!?
/r/MensRights25/08/17 10:13 PM
8

As in kill their own young? The fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:58 AM
23

In the context of this women you're right, but he said women, which encompasses all women which is not fair to the majority of women that haven't stabbed their children
/r/MensRights07/07/17 03:22 AM
51

I get what your saying, but we're getting a little red pillish with this mindset. This women in particular is absoltely human garbage and I know this has happened before, but let's not just blanket bash them
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:14 AM
18

That's fucking infuriating
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:14 PM
6

It's forward thinking by them, can you imagine actually having to tolerate someone else's opinion?
/r/MensRights12/12/16 06:18 PM
12

:(
/r/MensRights19/11/16 10:57 PM
11

You're spreading a good message here, u/-Yiffing
/r/MensRights19/11/16 09:59 PM
21

People like you make me happy, keep being you
/r/MensRights15/11/16 09:03 PM
17

This seems to be going around a bit
/r/MensRights14/11/16 11:17 PM
5

True. You want to trigger a feminist? Male is the evolved form of the human species. Female is just the default, unfinished template. Ohh man, the rage and triggering this would cause on tumblr would be amazing to witness
/r/MensRights02/11/16 11:15 PM
3

Seriously though, but it does paint a very good picture of how feminists want men to be, just mindless drones waiting around to obey their every command
/r/MensRights29/06/16 06:24 PM
3

That video was pretty bad, but what I thought was really insulting/infuriating was all the ads with the boys wearing sweatshirts and jerseys that all had "waiting for instructions" written on front. Like what the actual fuck is with that, are they trying to say that men need to be told what to do at all times!?
/r/MensRights29/06/16 06:12 PM
2

Down under?
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:53 PM
1

Let me tell you, my jimmies have been rustled
/r/MensRights31/07/15 04:21 PM
2

"MRAs believe that feminists are to blame for basically everything that's wrong with their lives. The Men's Rights Movement is a reactionary movement created specifically to counter feminism, and most (if not all) of their time and resources go towards silencing and marginalizing women" If you swap the usage of MRA and feminists (as well as men and women) in this paragraph you basically get a tumblr feminist
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:48 PM
0

You were right, solid share, good going OP
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:22 PM
6

Fuck, I actually can feel it about to happen
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:19 PM
1

LIIEEESSSSSSS!
/r/MensRights13/06/15 06:57 AM
1

So they attack the idea of someone saying "not all men", and then fucking hyphen their own version of the same idea?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:53 PM
1

What does NAFALT mean?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:39 PM
2

Where the Fuck did you get that up arrow?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:38 PM
1

Ohhh, thx
/r/MensRights11/06/15 06:37 PM
1

I'm curious, what did he say?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 06:25 PM
2

Excellent point, but if they were to be believed they all wish they were black
/r/MensRights11/06/15 02:51 PM
1

TiA has a higher probability of getting banned then this sub,
/r/MensRights11/06/15 02:51 PM
0

I hadn't heard about that until recently, and I agree with their ban now, personal information should remain personal EDIT: well shit, fuck that guy, and fuck chairman pao
/r/MensRights11/06/15 12:40 PM
3

The fact the writer refers to game of thrones as "homosexual torture porn" seriously discredits anything he was going to say IMO
/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:17 PM
9

That honestly makes a shit ton of since, sort of like the artificial scarcity around diamonds
/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:47 PM
1

Thank you
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:38 PM
1

Sorry for the ignorance, but what is 670-1?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:40 PM
2

I couldn't agree with you more, true liberty and equality means you'll never be denied an opportunity based on your sex or ethnicity, the result though, is entirely dependent on you
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:47 AM
1

Agreed, it's like murder, it doesn't matter the race or gender of the person doing it or of the victim, the sick Fuck that does it should fucking rot
/r/MensRights04/01/15 06:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter