TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Geohump Archive

View 2 posts and 297 comments by Geohump on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yup, that's sexist and so is the males but no females in a fight issue.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 08:31 PM
1

yeah but when you cheap out, all you get is a torso......
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:31 PM
1

Um, would you believe it's part of a mail order bride? :-) It's what you get when you're using Dragon's naturally speaking, speech recognition product. And it doesn't recognize the fact that you said female, and not email.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:50 PM
2

It's hilarious that the women engaged in a protest march are upset that people came to take pictures of the protest. It's also rather ironic that this protest, if done repeatedly over time will eventually result in exactly the thing they want. When naked breasts in public become commonplace men will no longer be aroused by them in public, and nobody will be upset that naked breasts are there. So if these people want to not have naked female torsos be ogled, all they have to do is keep going out …
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:00 PM
1

When I read the article I had no idea what race the people involved were. Further, my relationships in the 1970's were bi-racial. So you need to modify your statement to reflect what I actually said above which included that fact that the boy didn't deserve to die. This piece of shit doesn't care when black boys die. That was another attempt at strawmanning. Apparently you never learned the concept of personal integrity? Do you think continuous lying is a valid technique for living?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:30 PM
0

Yup, we agree about that. However, being stupid has its own consequences. "You want me to sneak into your Dad's house at night to fuck you? " This should have rung hundreds of alarm bells in the boy's head. Instead of "sure!" the boy should have said "No way!"
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:28 PM
1

Re "hurt": getting killed is definitely a form of getting hurt. My statement there was a referring to the general idea of what will happen to any boy who who sneaks into a family's house at night and gets discovered in a daughters room by the father. "Not getting hurt" would be the unusual outcome! In this instance the boy was killed. Regardless, the father was completely within his rights given the circumstances and the daughters claim that the boy was a stranger. The main culprit here is the d…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:24 PM
0

Father was completely within his rights. Yes the daughter should go to jail. and the parents of the boy should have all their other kids taken away from them since they clearly don't know how to raise kids to know better than to sneak into other people's homes at night.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:21 PM
-1

Actually there was no sexual interaction at all described in the accounts of the incident. It seems clear that the intent was to have sex, but its not clear if it had started or not. Further, the descriptions state that the father thought that the boy was reaching for a weapon, not that he saw a weapon. (What you did with your little re-write there is called "strawmanning". Its a form of lying) You blame a father for shooting someone he finds in his daughter's room at night? Speaking as a father…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:18 PM
1

No one deserved to die or be shot. But if you sneak into your girlfriends house at night to have sex in her room while her parents are there? And you get hurt by the parents? You were stupid AND its your fault. grow. up.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:05 AM
0

Kid should not have been there at all. But Daughter pushed this over from "awkward and angry" into "life and death"' First one is "Boy in my girls room at night?" second one is "Intruder in my daughter's room!!!!" Both the boy and the daughter are at fault here. The homeowner behaved rationally.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:03 AM
0

Kid should not have been there at all. But Daughter pushed this over from "awkward and angry" into "life and death"' First one is "Boy in my girls room at night?" second one is "Intruder in my daughter's room!!!!" Both the boy and the daughter are at fault here. The homeowner behaved rationally.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:02 AM
2

VICTIM BLAMING! VICTIM BLAMING! Also victim blaming is : telling people to wear seatbelts telling people to check your smoke detectors once a year telling people to get a physical once a year telling people to save for your old age telling people don't flash a huge roll of money late at night in a strange bar telling people to run antivirus software STOP THE BLAMING!!!!! (yes, this is intended to be sarcasm. )
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:29 PM
2

No way, thats the best pun I've seen all week! :-) The fact that its a pun on the meaning as well as the sound of homonym just makes it even better!
/r/MensRights11/03/14 01:14 PM
0

Sorry to disappoint you but surveys actually show that that people who have the characteristics listed do default to supporting choice. So its simply a fact, not an ad homonym attack. I understand that you want to think its just name calling. That's part of how people who have untenable positions rationalize their poor thinking.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 03:39 PM
1

Interesting. Planned parenthood helps males by giving us some degree of control over of our choice to be fathers that we would not have otherwise. They support the choice in both directions, to be or to not be a parent. I see this as a good thing. Further, all progressive, educated, scientifically literate people will automatically support choice. There is no such thing as magic. The Blastula does not magically become "A human being" at the moment of conception. That's silly, magical, superstiti…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:21 PM
3

He is referring to the kinds of people who say things like 'IT'S NOT MY JOB TO EDUCATE SHITLORDS' . Or at least that's what i think he is referring to.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:04 AM
3

Wait, i have issues...... oh no.... ;-)
/r/MensRights08/03/14 10:08 PM
2

And yet mainstream Mormonism is where people keep joining the polygamists from. Its the Mormon version of the religious right.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 03:39 PM
2

Who is fighting the father on this? Its HIS BABY!
/r/MensRights08/03/14 03:38 PM
0

And since they were standing on a platform the only way he could get a picture was to be at a level below them, eg "up-skirt' . Nice try "uncle fisty".
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:10 PM
1

As I understand this you are claiming that taking upskirts is OK to do. The women who were photographed were standing on a subway platform. Not seated. Not even on the train. So he had to point the camera "up". So yes that's wrong, and he's lucky no father caught him. "uncle fisty" have you been registered yet?
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:34 PM
3

He was certainly aiming his camera up girls skirts. Are you saying that should be legal? Are you saying that wearing skirts is the problem?
/r/MensRights06/03/14 04:50 PM
3

Thank you for your well thought out and extensive reply. It was exactly what i was looking for. How do we make it illegal to do these kinds of things without harming people who are not doing anything wrong? Sexual Coercion, by any means, such as the guilt example you provided, is wrong, but does that mean we can make it illegal? Should we make it illegal? Living means taking the risk of harm, but that harm comes at many different levels/degrees of damage. Can we/Should we try to have the legal s…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 04:33 PM
2

Also, don't ask them out for coffee... Especially in an elevator.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 04:29 PM
0

yes, the vagueness and lack of objective testability makes this a serious problem. So how can we solve it intelligently?
/r/MensRights06/03/14 04:28 PM
1

Would we be able to make a law that says its illegal to take pictures of another human for sexual gratification, unless that human gives explicit permission to do so? That would cover upskirting and all pervy photo taking of people who do not agree to participate in such. Or would such a law be too vague and general to be valid?
/r/MensRights06/03/14 02:00 PM
1

Violence requires touching be actual violence. But threats of violence are already illegal (its technically "assault" ) But that does not mean that other behaviors should be allowed. All forms of sexual coercion should be illegal. Examples include: threats of violence "guilting" Other things that should be illegal as form of sexual assault: non-consensual groping (eg grabbing "feel") non-consensual picture taking for sexual gratification Note that the last one is going to be incredibly vague and…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 01:53 PM
1

And to think i used to love alphabet soup....... ;-)
/r/MensRights05/03/14 02:45 PM
2

Thank you. That's a great resource. I apologize for my skepticism!
/r/MensRights05/03/14 02:44 PM
0

Abortion availability has been reduced to a small fraction of what it was. There are many regions of the country where it has become so unavailable, that it is not available in any realistic sense. Go count the number of places that can legally do abortions in Kansas, Minnesota, Texas and Massachusetts. Drive times of six hours compared to 30 minutes? Quite a contrast. For a poor, working single mother, just getting to a clinic that's far away can be impossible. And that is exactly what abortion…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 06:03 PM
2

The US Bureau of Justice Statistics counts "verbal threats" as a failed rape attempt. Are you sure? Can you please put up the link to the page where you read that? Part of the reason I am skeptical is because the USA doesn't have a "Bureau of Justice". The USA has a "Department of Justice" (DOJ)
/r/MensRights02/03/14 11:15 PM
7

No,its part of normal human behavior. Rumor mongering, gossiping and sniping about what others have done has been part of human behavior since we could talk. Its the extension of a survival trait. Basic communication about good and bad things others have run into makes it easier for a group to survive and even thrive. The downside is that there is an actual addiction to this behavior. Like some drugs, the activity can produce a chemical reward in the brain. Yes, seriously, people get a serotonin…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 03:52 PM
0

Except we are talking about a child here That's a direct quote from you, 5 hours ago.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 02:52 AM
-1

Did you intend to reply to me? 'Cause that's what you did.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 10:53 PM
4

As recently as the 1970's there were places in the US where the age of consent was 13/14.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 09:31 PM
2

Nice write up. Its good to help people see the differences in other cultures.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 09:29 PM
1

You have a very strange idea of what the word contradiction means.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 09:28 PM
-1

Then they are both children. The difference between 18 and 21 is not that big a difference mentally.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 09:28 PM
1

this is a perfect example of "female privilege based" thinking.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 03:47 PM
2

Well thats a nice try at an ad hominem attack, but all you've done is reveal your own lack.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 02:53 PM
2

I'm sorry, I thought you understood the basic concepts here. This last argument you have posited shows that you completely misunderstand how the reality of statistical population distribution works. Your argument has absolutely no relevance to the discussion at hand. I will make 1 attempt to help you understand why: If you are clothing manufacturer who mass produces clothing for sale to the public, will you include clothing that fits people who weigh 500 pounds? Until you are well enough educate…
/r/MensRights23/02/14 02:01 PM
1

I can't find actual numbers, but this picture may help you visualize the actual difference
/r/MensRights22/02/14 07:34 PM
1

Interesting that Israel feels differently than you do about it. Of course when you create a country by sheer, outright terrorism, theft and violence, you have to expect to stay completely militarized. The people whose country you have stolen will be trying to take it back.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 06:35 PM
1

"stronger, but not exceptionally stronger. I suggest you go and actually read the in depth studies. And this from the article you amusingly quoted, but clearly didn't READ: " At the same time, however, testosterone also may shave off men's strength for the long haul." Not to mention stamina/ endurance. Correct, you should not mention stamina/endurance because *women have more than men.* which clearly illuminates the lack of background education and research you are steeped in. Women have a highe…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 05:42 PM
2

Nope, just the upper end of the curve. Remember we have a pool of 3.5 Billion. Out of that several million would qualify. Several million is not "an exception". :-)
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:08 PM
5

No, I'm admitting that the distribution of upper body strength in both genders is a bell shaped curve**, and that statistically, while women on average have less upper body strength, there will be large numbers of women who will have the requisite strength for the job because the pool of possible applicants is so large. ** - each gender's curve is separate from the other gender's curve
/r/MensRights21/02/14 04:46 PM
0

Snort - The Israeli army has shown this to be wrong for over 50 years.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 03:36 PM
5

There are already male midwives, as well as nurses, and there are female construction workers.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 03:35 PM
5

men and women typically have 2 eyes, 2 ears, a nose, a mouth, 2 arms, 2 legs, etc... Men have slightly better upper body strength on average Women (may) have slightly better finger dexterity on average (this may be due to cultural indoctrination, rather than tissue differences) So yeah, women can do any job men can do, on average. Occasionally one gender can do a specific task slightly better than the other gender, but not significantly. Why is this even a question? Note - they shouldn't ever lo…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 03:33 PM
1

headdesk.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 03:15 AM
1

There are all kinds of bizarre hypothetical situations people bring up..."who's the rapist" questions. And those should be discussed. But the idea of decriminalizing "rape" should not be discussed, because, in part, it will be taken to mean making rape legal. And there is a certain faction that will try to capitalize on that. And they will be successful. See the headline: "MRA's Lobby To Make Rape Legal!" In the words of Uncle Bobby: "Idjit" FYI- i don't mean that last bit, the video, i just lik…
/r/MensRights16/02/14 04:35 AM
1

There is no blurring of "rape" and "consensual". Rape is not ever going to be decriminalized. And suggesting it was stupid. (I wonder if this is a troll) There will always be some questionable/ambiguous situations, but this: "..we should just accept that rape is part of life and if women really want to protect themselves, it should be up to them to do so, not the state/criminal justice system." Is just a heinous, and deliberate attempt to provoke people.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:58 AM
1

technically, you should call him a dick..... ( IFF he was wrong, that is... )
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:25 PM
1

but please try to grasp just how little you know. You may be the one with the overly narrow mindset. Most significant scientific contributions, especially in Math and Physics, come from young people. Can this topic area somehow be unassailable by an agile mind?
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:24 PM
1

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that current feminism is anti-male?
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:21 PM
-1

Please don't call it gynocentrism. Focus on the actions. if you start calling it names like that, you'll sound like Rush Limbaugh and may end up with the same level of respect he has.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:20 PM
1

You're tarnishing an entire movement due to the actions of the idiotic minority here What numerical analysis are you using to claim that these actions are the work of an idiotic minority? It sounds like you may be using the "No True Scotsman" fallacy here, as in: "the real feminists aren't doing this. " I certainly perceive these actions to be the work of the "real feminists." Its clear that the feminists leadership endorse and promote these anti-MRA actions. Its clear that the feminist influenc…
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:18 PM
4

"Margaret Thatcher" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_War
/r/MensRights02/02/14 04:12 PM
1

touche' :)
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:52 AM
2

Honest to God, tell us her name!!!!
/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:49 PM
1

How did they enlist/select the participants? In my experience, this is the hardest step to do well.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 03:25 PM
3

an N of 17,000 is statistically valid for any sized population. As long as the group polled was selected appropriately. Most statistical studies don't get anywhere near 17000 people in them.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 03:40 AM
3

Source please? (jpg is hard to read and would like to see publishing info)
/r/MensRights24/01/14 03:38 AM
1

yay! True Blave!
/r/MensRights12/01/14 01:56 AM
1

Well you could point them to "The Princess Bride" where the prince is an unabashed villian. (But the movie has The Spainaird, Fezzik, and Wesley in it as well, so its OK.)
/r/MensRights12/01/14 01:56 AM
1

Stories and "experiences" that are clearly untrue to anyone who reads them are far more detrimental .. I agree. But i would like to say that this story doesn't sound out of the scope of reasonably likely at all. Of course we have no way to know if its real or not. See this is why everyone should have a google glass on record 24x7. </I wish..>
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:21 PM
-1

Exclamations don't have to be complete sentences. Fun fact; Most frequently heard last spoken words on Black boxes recovered from fatal aircraft crashes: "oh shit!"
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:15 AM
-1

how can you say that? people -never- lie on reddit.. :-) (not picking sides, Just acknowledging that reddit is not always the best place to get both sides of a story.)
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:11 AM
13

Assault - threat of violence. Battery - actual violence You need to call the police and document this incident. If she did this kind of violence under this relatively mild circumstance she will be doing more. She may already be abusing her partner(s). You also need to follow through on charging and prosecuting for this incident.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:03 AM
5

You should take legal action. This constitutes employment discrimination and is a federal offense. In some states it is a state level offense as well.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 07:09 PM
3

So this is an ad suggesting women cover their faces and eyes?
/r/MensRights25/12/13 07:03 PM
1

No, public humiliation is not a valid teaching technique, Its a form of bullying. So now the teacher has endorsed acts of mass public bullying. Even worse, it put the boy in a position where he now has to defend his act no matter what he really thinks to show that he's not afraid of anything. So now the boy is going to be even more ill behaved in the future just to show he can't be pushed around. The teacher should have handled it some other way. This teacher actually has made the situation wors…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:51 PM
1

That means feminists are allying with one of the groups that actually promotes suppressing women's rights?? Sheesh. Politics makes strange bedfellows.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:08 PM
1

This world (industrialized western nations) is taking feminists very seriously. That's why this sub exists.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:06 PM
1

Completely agree, Any teacher that thinks humiliating and degrading students is OK , is a horrible teacher. This is simply teaching bullying as an officially endorsed behavior. As Ooshkii says, we don't know what the kid said. It could have been nothing or it could have been something so horrible we would want to beat him for it. We simply do not know. But one thing civilization has learned is that public humiliation does not teach people to behave better. And encouraging others to degrade a per…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:00 PM
5

Thats right! "Animal Farm" is the instruction manual.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:13 AM
1

women have accused people who kissed them without consent , of sexual assault, so that's where kissing being sexual assault comes from.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:12 PM
1

Hi Bartab - Could you post the reference to the text of the legislation/law? The reason I ask, is that we can't make a general law that prohibits people from making a list of other people that they don't like and hoping that no one will hire them. We can explicitly prohibit employers from doing that, but not the general public. So while this activity would clearly be illegal for an employer to do, I'm not sure we can prohibit non-employers, even if they're an actual organization of some sort, of…
/r/MensRights16/12/13 03:32 PM
2

OK, point conceded. ... ;-)
/r/MensRights16/12/13 03:18 PM
1

Cool. thanks for the update.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 02:54 PM
1

2 out of 3?
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:48 PM
2

no; it;s not;
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:47 PM
1

Please don't point this out so clearly and loudly. You may distract them from blowing their foot off.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:46 PM
3

Wait, what about getting synonymous on it? (synonymous is an organization with just one person it it, but they have over 3 million anonymous nicks they use, so they are very powerful.. )
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:45 PM
5

Grace Hopper (Navy retired, Admiral? iirc) was part of the team (leader?) that defined Cobol. Dunno if she also worked on the compiler for it. Given how on top of things she was, i would not be surprised. Sharp Lady . Fun Fact - Adm Hopper did not start her Naval career until she was 37! Signed up during WWII!
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:15 PM
3

Hi Bartab. (great Nick!) I agree that all of these things are illegal for an employer to do. i do not know for sure that they are illegal for a non-employer to do. I hope that it is illegal for a non-employer, but I'm not sure the activities of the public can be curtailed in this fashion. As a next resort, such a list could be considered a tortious interference with business. But IANAL. so please consult an actual Lawyer/Attorney.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:13 PM
1

Its cultural programming. Western men are programmed to think Asian women are "exotically beautiful, softly feminine and submissive," because of movies and TV shows. Turns out that's just a myth, they're actually human beings.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 03:46 PM
3

Thanks for posting this second URl. I was wondering about the first article until I saw this. You should submit the second artcile!
/r/MensRights05/12/13 01:14 AM
1

You cared. Sad things is politics (especially gender politics) are hyper polarized today. Hot Like Chernobyl, er Fukushima..
/r/MensRights26/11/13 06:26 AM
3

Never engage in politics in any fashion that's visible in the workplace. This is just advice. not criticism.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 05:51 AM
7

Do you feel rape/abuse/violence happens more to women than to men? Not to be contrary, But I have no interest in how people "feel" about the rate at which something happens. I want real numbers from scientifically valid research.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 05:20 AM
3

Sadly, the participants don't condemn it, they perpetuate it. Elitism seems to cause a certain kind of indifference to cruelty to others. iirc there have been some studies that actually document this phenomenon. edit - typos
/r/MensRights05/11/13 04:00 PM
1

It does exist, but only in very tiny pockets, for example some idiots at frat houses. But not even as any large fraction of even a small part of the mainstream.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:07 AM
1

From thearticle you linked: The monopoly was awarded to the London Company of Stationers on May 4, 1557. It was called copyright. Calling something copyright doesn't make it a copyright. Just like the US Patriot Act is actually anti-patriotism, this act was a royally granted monopoly on the use of printing presses in England. It has nothing to do with actual copyright. Here is information about what the actual history of copyright is: "The history of copyright law starts with early privileges an…
/r/MensRights30/10/13 01:01 PM
1

No. copyright was created to incent people to create new works. Copyright doesn't help you censor anything.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:47 PM
1

One of the most aggressive and militaristic national leaders of the last 200 years: Margaret Thatcher. (note: "one of", Not "the most". ) Another one of the most aggressive and militaristic national leaders of the last 200 years: Sarah Palin. Fortunately too stupid to get elected.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:45 PM
0

Horrible rhetoric in the video. The rhetoric is so extreme I couldn't like him and feel like supporting him even though I want to. Guy needs to tone down the the adjectives a little and make it seem less like a rant and more like a listing of facts.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 06:00 PM
9

" a dude famous for calling date rape fun" Source? from a credible journalistic entity?
/r/MensRights27/09/13 01:08 AM
1

Person A Holds up Bank B at Gunpoint. Person C was not there, Person C did not see the attack Person C did not know the attack was going to take place. Therefore, Person C is at fault for the attack. ???? Lets refine this a little: Person C tells Bank B: "Life is dangerous, take precautions against dangerous people. Be careful." Person A attacks Bank B. Person C was not there, Person C did not see the attack Person C did not know the attack was going to take place. Therefore, Person C is STILL a…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 02:08 PM
10

Wonderful. ... except they put it on the mirror. They could have posted it 11 inches to the left, but now some poor guy has to scrape the whole freaking thing off. Thanks for not thinking.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:29 PM
-1

tl; dr. ? Seriously, You have excellent info here. To make it more effective to the pablum oriented public (yes, me included), Can you break it into some chunks and hit the most important parts? Instead of letting the feminists define the structure of your document, remove everything they say and format it as your statement on the F. "rape culture" "false threat narrative"/propaganda doctrine.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 09:15 PM
15

I don't understand this, "totes"? (Go easy on me, I'm old and outa touch. :-) )
/r/MensRights22/09/13 09:06 PM
0

Your claims about "not being rational" are laughable. A "silencing attack" with no logic behind it. Are you sure you're not a feminist? This attack is very typical of them. Person 1 hurts Person 2. Person 2 will always want to hurt them back. This is one of the most fundamental behaviors of humanity. It doesn't matter if the hurt is physical, or economic, or emotional. You're probably making a willfull attempt to deny reality in order rationalize your position. You also probably didn't bother to…
/r/MensRights22/09/13 04:34 PM
1

If they only did it once, I would agree with you, apparently this was repeated, and done so in a deliberately provocative fashion. Yeah I personally would not have used the glass, unless the guy much bigger than I was..... :-)
/r/MensRights22/09/13 01:13 AM
1

I'm posting this with a pointer to a translation of the original news article because many of the responses in the original posting seem to indicate that a lot of the people didn't read the article, (reasonable because the article is in German) and didn't really have an understanding of what was going on. In a nutshell, person A was being a real jerk. the translation is very rough. but some of the facts are clear: the building is a smoke-free establishment person A knew it was a smoke-free build…
/r/MensRights22/09/13 12:29 AM
0

Excuse me? A rational analysis provokes this response? Do you have any logic to present to back up your emotions? I doubt it. It doesn't even look like you read the whole post. I suggest you read the judges opinion in the article too. Just might learn something. You'll also learn that the person who got hit deliberately provoked the woman multiple times. There's no question that in this case, HE was an ASSHOLE. I would have hit him too. Probably sooner. Don't be a knee-jerk redditor. We have eno…
/r/MensRights21/09/13 11:21 PM
2

Until there is scientific proof that attitudes about violence are cultural indoctrination, I'm afraid you won't get anywhere. For some people ignorance is bliss. You can't take people's bliss away from them without a fight.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 06:20 PM
2

JUDGE SAYS the prosecutor sought an acquittal because the blowing the smoke a derogatory and insulting action was that self-defense was justified. The criminal judge went even further and evaluated the behavior of the smoker as personal injury. The 30-year-old was close approached the woman and told her "mixed with saliva particles" blowing the smoke right in your face. The mucous membranes of the student had been irritated by it. Get cigarette smoke carcinogens, as well as viruses and bacteria.…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 06:03 PM
-6

If you deliberately blow cigarette smoke into someones face, that is battery. It is an actual physical attack because you are directing a carcinogen into their respiratory system. Its also a clearly culturally identified act of deliberate provocation. I don't care what gender you are, if you do this, you deserve to get smashed in the face. Of course, if the genders were reversed in this situation, female provoking and male reacting, it would still be the male getting in trouble. because "gender …
/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:49 PM
7

Treat her like an equal, kick the crap out of her. Wait - that's illegal to do to a man as well. Nevermind. Oh well, indulgent thinking.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:11 PM
1

Hee hee. thats a nice one! but I was referring to the Bain meme. "I was a feminist before you were born.... etc"
/r/MensRights11/09/13 04:40 PM
2

WRONG!! your all "mansplaining" The reason no women are in the list of the top 50 guitarists is because none of the men would let them on the list! (Narrators side text: (OK we got a clear case of looniness here. Or is he being sarcastic? Dammit I wish these weirdos would be clear about their intent. Is this satire, parody or stupidity? why doesn't the union have rules against this sort of thing! To hell with it! )
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:21 AM
1

First of all don't bother burning the Tolstoy. I started burning my Tolstoy about 12 years ago and I'm only 14% of the way through. It just takes too long..... Frankly I think the Russian authors are the actual answer to the energy crisis. I have, however, decided that all of my future works will be published under the name "Carolyn Keene" just to ensure that they are given equal consideration by the opposite gender. "Opposite to what" you ask? An excellent question. the only response I can give…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:15 AM
5

I'm male and I was a feminist before most of you were born. ( No, do not apply that stupid meme. :-) ) This was back in the late 60's. In the 70's much progress was made and Feminism grew and changed and by the 1980's the Misandry was clearly becoming a part of the program Eventually the systemic Misandry moved feminism away from its equalitarian roots and into a form of gender fascism, evident today by the incredible amount of censorship and Orwellian "Animal Farm" type hypocrisy and rhetoric t…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:17 AM
1

I assume this teacher has been fired? and had the deleted description of what i'd like to say out of them
/r/MensRights08/09/13 10:11 PM
7

Thank you for posting this. it is a most enlightening article. I'm in my 6th decade on the planet and I did not know this about MS. Parks. Hooray for her and hooray for you too, for bringing this to our attention.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:25 PM
3

Its a Kilt! :-) or not. :-)
/r/MensRights06/09/13 04:49 PM
-2

it doesn't punish the husband, it just makes him responsible for an out of control spouse. If she were male she might be arrested and charged. Not likely to happen. So this puts it on her spouse. As a driver, he isn't going to tolerate anything that keeps him from racing. (Speaking as a both a former driver and crew member). He is going to make sure that she behaves if its going to keep him from racing. Of course we have seen the drivers get into fights after races for other things so perhaps de…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:14 AM
6

Dear Inti Chavez Perez I have never raped. Now what?
/r/MensRights02/09/13 10:40 PM
8

Just a small example of female privilege.... Her husband should be banned from NASCAR until the wife apologizes and signs an agreement to never assault anyone else again (She should be charged with a crime) Racing means shit happens. If you can't handle that, don't go.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 09:00 PM
2

Interesting, apparently you think someone said that women would never take her clothes off or have sex without getting paid. But nothing I said has anything to do with that. Do women strip when there is no audience? men will play football when no one is watching. Playing Football has no audience interaction as part of the game (The TV business certainly sells it as entertainment, but that's a different issue) Don't put words in other people's mouths please.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 02:37 AM
2

Sure, but her audience isn't mostly other women.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 02:32 AM
3

Ja, ja, ja. This was over weeks ago. been dealt with. Stop giving her free attention
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:43 PM
8

This is a stupid attempt to equate two things that are not anywhere near equivalent. We men play football whether we get paid to or not. Its a sport we do for our own enjoyment. The main audience for football is men, not women. Do women strip for their own enjoyment? Is the audience for women stripping mostly women? Is pro football "male exploitation"? No more than Pro Baseball or Pro Basketball is.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 10:37 AM
0

perceptions are not reality, unless you're a woman or an HR person.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 10:22 PM
1

Thank you. :-)
/r/MensRights06/08/13 01:37 AM
2

I'm going to ask because I'm ignorant: what does "brigaded" mean in this context, please?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:20 PM
1

New Yorkers to see 50% drop in health insurance costs in Obamacare exchange Health Care Plans Under Obamacare Will Cost Even Less Than Expected Obamacare prices roll in lower than forecast If you are young, go for a plan with a bigger deductible. it will cost less and Your age makes it less of a risk
/r/MensRights01/08/13 12:53 AM
2

Just FYI - In most states that have reported in on the pricing "Romneycare" (Its not "Obamacare", its a copy of what Romney did in Massachusetts) has caused the price of health care to drop. Please be wary of that warnings that are being spouted about RomneyCare making prices go up. Its designed to make prices go down, and "the-american-interest.com" is a known biased web site. they have a very poor record and quite often miss the facts. In passing - I worked as an analyst for IDC. My job (in pa…
/r/MensRights01/08/13 12:44 AM
3

What state and which judge?
/r/MensRights31/07/13 08:36 PM
1

This is total garbage. There isn't any law that requires the wife's signature in order for a man to obtain a vasectomy. You should push this as far as you can. Step one; consult a lawyer. Make sure you want a lawyer to understand that you wish to collect the evidence to use in a lawsuit against the urology firm and as the lawyer exactly how to go about it. Lawyers will often base their advice on the idea that the lawyer wants to make as much money as possible. The longer the court case goes the …
/r/MensRights29/07/13 04:18 PM
0

I would definitely boycott KFC for the stupidity level of the commercial. However since I don't eat there, it would be kind of redundant for me to start boycotting. :-) Up votes for the guys comments below! Thanks for the laughs guys!
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:21 PM
4

to the people saying he shouldn't give up on her: We don't know the history. We do know that religious fundamentalists will often not change no matter how many facts are presented to them. If she is a fundamentalist, and he has already been dialoging with her for years, then he is right to cut his losses and not waste his time, his energy and his emotional well being any further.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:56 PM
21

Interesting that the majority (66%) of the victims of patriarchy in the cartoon are male.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:53 PM
4

Her perspective was that of having been so severely conditioned that she assumes all men are rapists, to such a degree that being asked for a cigarette made her believe that she was about to be raped. She needs to be in treatment and on medication until she can resume a balanced and reasonable perspective on life. She is delusional, paranoid, and hysteric. She is deliberately trying to damage people's lives - for asking for a cigarette.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 09:22 PM
3

No, the safe way for a person this paranoid, unreasonable and hysteric would have been to stay home and only go out with adult supervision. Keep in mind SHE FOLLOWED THEM TO TRY TO GET THEM ARRESTED. She wasn't worried about being safe, she wanted to mess up some "males".
/r/MensRights05/07/13 09:13 PM
-1

Asking for a cigarette does not scare an adult woman. They did not "scare a girl". They inquired to an ADULT WOMAN about a cigarette. The female was nasty, aggressive and the aggressor for 80% of this situation, the men, only 20%. Asking someone for a cigarette is not an attack or threat. Threatening to call the police because someone asked you for a cigarette, is a hostile, aggressive attack for no good reason. The woman was unreasonable and unbalanced, probably due to severe mental conditionin…
/r/MensRights05/07/13 09:09 PM
0

Amen, bro - The female was nasty, aggressive and the aggressor for 80% of this situation, the men, only 20%. Asking someone for a cigarette is not an attack or threat. Threatening to call the police because someone asked you for a cigarette, is a hostile, aggressive attack for no good reason. This woman is mentally ill, or has been mentally conditioned so severely that she has become delusional.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 09:04 PM
4

They did give her space, you dingbat, they moved to the other side of the road. And they DIDN"T EVEN DO ANYTHING except REACT to her ASSHOLERY! She has no reasonable excuse for saying she would call 911. Someone asking you for a cigarette (or offering to buy one) is not in any way a threat. If a person is a paranoid hysteric then they shouldn't be leaving their house without some kind of adult supervision. This woman is clearly is not a rational adult. By the way- any specific man is NOT "clearl…
/r/MensRights05/07/13 08:58 PM
2

You need to send her a letter, with a copy to her husband, saying the due to her generous hospitality, you won't be visiting her place again.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 08:39 PM
1

because we've been through that part of history. The "we" here is "humanity" as in "We, the people". And yes, we have been through that part of history. Nobody alive has been through "that part of history." Actually, nobody dead has either because it didn't exist. Apparently you didn't understand what was being referred to there. But there are still countries today where women are considered to be property of their husband, and for Western societies, like the USA, the time when women were treate…
/r/MensRights24/06/13 05:56 PM
32

I'd like to interject that I don't think you need to preface it with "I don't mean to be rude". Because that sort of implies that it's rude of you to tell her that she was ignoring the fact that it was your body. It's not rude. She was the one who was rude, incredibly rude in fact. Actually it goes farther than rude. It was female chauvinism. Imagine the screams in the feminist community, if they were presented with a story with the genders reversed. The husband is consulted about getting his wi…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:40 PM
3

OK, which ones of us are the normal ones? :-)
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:08 PM
8

As long as my mustache matches my dress it's OK. The sad part is now all I can dress in are grey dresses.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:07 PM
10

that's when the ad hominem attacks would begin really start to escalate. FTFY. :-)
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:05 PM
1

Indeed, He or she should considering how much they're getting paid! :-)
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:01 PM
3

[WTDWSR] (warning, text dictated with speech recognition software; errors likely to be present) The picture that was posted of the text from the argument is one of the worst arguments I've ever seen, for anything. Let's take the first comment that they make "no amount of education can make you know more about mental illness than those who actually suffer from it." Let's test this premise out with cardiac disease: "no amount of education can make you know more about cardiac disease than those who…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:47 PM
1

the logic in the article shows that the author of the report, or the author of the explanation that claims that men cause menopause, lacks a realistic understanding of how evolution works. Characteristics that did not happen until after the age of breeding, have no effect on evolution. Menopause does not occur in human females until the age long past their breeding period. Therefore the selection of females who are still able to breed, i.e. younger females, has no effect or causation of menopaus…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 01:57 AM
0

You picked up a MAN who was hitchhiking???? OMG!!! YOU COULD HAVE BEEN KILLED! Don't you know that all Males who are not escorted by women are Serial Killers and Rapists? Any Male who is away from the angelic influence of a the calming, soothing female presence for more that eight minutes, immediately devolves into a degenerate beast of violence and cunning?? RUN! RUN FOR YOUR LIFE! < ahem - sarcasm and totally nothing to do with the topic. I just had to say it. Sorry. :) >
/r/MensRights11/06/13 08:29 PM
1

Is there a kickstarter site (or similar ) for this effort?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:50 PM
0

Amen, bro.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 10:01 PM
1

Given today's climate of male persecution in the courts, I would say that a pre-nup is the only sane thing to do. Get one from a lawyer that's titled "Standard pre-nuptial agreement for mature couples" Yes,- have them put that title on it so it looks like a generic, off the shelf form. That removes some of the self-fulfilling prophecy aura from it. and turns it into a standard thing people do. make sure it has clauses that protect both parties equally or it will be obvious that its really your c…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 10:00 PM
1

wait until she is not home. Call the police immediately. Tell them what she said about reporting you for rape etc. and tell them about the incident with the knife and how violent she has become. Move out immediately with their escort. Return to your home even if it's embarrassing. This is the best possible option that I can see in your situation. No matter how embarrassing or shaming it is, you have to get away from her. By informing the police of her intentions to issue false reports of rape an…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:04 AM
0

We do live in an over sexualized society. Too much emphasis on sexuality. But - its not just "lads mags" that do this, Every woman's fashion magazine does it as well. Yes Cosmo especially, but also Marie Claire and Women's Day. And every advertisement that has women in it. Modern culture celebrates feminine beauty and there is no real line that separates feminine beauty from feminine sexuality. To stop the exploitation of female sexuality by modern culture we would have to ban all images of fema…
/r/MensRights27/05/13 04:18 PM
3

Nice. good advice. |^
/r/MensRights13/05/13 05:17 PM
1

It is typical of extremists positions that they oversimplify actual reality to polarize their audience. Yes women have been treated as less than the equals of men by many cultures (but not all) and some went as far as to treat women as slaves, BUT very few. As time, technology and civilization have moved forward most cultures steadily improve in this area. More progress is still needed in many non-western cultures. Are Western cultures perfect in this area yet? Nope, we still have rape, murder a…
/r/MensRights13/05/13 05:15 PM
15

Please post the text of your project, or make a web page out of it. Pics of text are not that way to present that info.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:43 PM
2

Ha. Thats what you think. (just in case you're not paranoid yet... )
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:54 PM
1

This sentence just reeks of cisgender privilege. People have good reasons to not always tell everyone they meet that they are transgender. Reasons like not wanting to get raped[2] , murdered[3] , fired from their job[4] , or made homeless[5] . So you forgot the part where I said that it would be dangerous? How convenient for your argument. Please be aware that when I report that passing will cause more open hate and hostility towards people who lie about being transgender, I am not predicting th…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 06:05 PM
0

Yes. Not everyone wants to be an activist. and I hope you noted that I did include the fact that disclosing publically could be dangerous. My post was simply trying to point out that the transgender community will get faster results at reducing discrimination towards their population with with public disclosure. It will not easy no matter what path is taken, although I suspect that the total amount of pain and hardship for the population will be reduced by taking the faster, and harder in the sh…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 05:52 PM
-1

Glad you agree.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 05:43 PM
0

Top - almost funny, Ok even a little funny, but not in the context of this serious discussion. topology is the study of surfaces and shapes. A person who has transgendered and had the surgery done to render their gentalia similar to that of their desired gender has created a surface gender identity as that desired gender. They still have the geneology of their genetic gender. Society does not yet accept "surface gender" as people's true gender identity. (Please notice, that I said "Society", and…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 05:42 PM
0

"Transgender people are responsible for transphobia." Interesting use of quoted material that did not exist. Is there anything else that you would like to make up and attack while attributing it to me? Did you learn to do that from the feminists? By the way, its called a "Strawman". Are perchance, a feminist? Because you have the intellectual integrity of one. Go back and read it again. This time, read it objectively. No where do I state that transgender people cause any hate. I do refer to the …
/r/MensRights27/04/13 05:30 PM
0

topological = outward shape.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 05:23 PM
2

if you're already married it may be too late. The only legal way to handle this is with a prenuptial agreement. With a slight chance of postnuptial agreement if you can convince her to sign it. Hiding assets during divorce is illegal and a crime. And it will make the judge angry at you. You definitely don't want the judge angry at you. If you're already married, and it appears that a divorce is on the way, with gold digging behavior on the part of your spouse/ex-spouse, all I can suggest is docu…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:29 PM
-4

mensrights will have some applicability to you as a man. But your issues that derive from being a genetic female who is presenting as a topological male, will be better understood in a transgender forum. the folks in a men's right form are already focused on the issues of discrimination against males in society today. They won't have as much general background knowledge, experience or information about the specific transgender issues that you will be running into. That doesn't mean you shouldn't…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:59 PM
7

My (white) grandfather was taken out of school when he was in third grade so he could work on the farm. (1908) My mother grew up in the cabin her father built and graduated from the one room schoolhouse she attended at 16. She went to college for a year and then came back and was the teacher at that same school she just graduated from for two years (1938 ). Then she went back to college. She and her parents paid for her college tuition. I graduated (at 18) from high school. I worked after school…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:52 AM
1

A marriage is a partnership. A Full partnership. the only reasonable answer to a request for a pre-nup is to say "pre-nope", and walk away. Get ready to leave right now and when you are fully able to walk away, tell her there will be no pre-nup. its a full marriage, both partners equal, or nothing. If she insists on the pre-nup then she isn't planning on a real marriage. Walk away and find someone who wants a real marriage. Becoming a lawyer turns most people into assholes.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:21 AM
-1

Yup, same here.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:29 AM
2

Power is contextual. There are situations where she could have power and a man has little to none. Anyone can be a victim Superbly concise. I wish 2 things: First; That everyone would understand this. Second; That I could compose/write as concisely and clearly as this. :-)
/r/MensRights01/04/13 04:41 PM
2

I've never heard gays try to enforce the use of "cis". if anything the gay people I know seem to disdain it and go for normal speech
/r/MensRights29/03/13 12:14 AM
22

Cis is just a (poor) attempt to engineer language to change people's perceptions. And its not going to work. Why not? For the same reason that people aren't suddenly going to start calling Linux, "GNU/Linux", [Ganoo Linux]. People never go longer, harder to say in their labels. The trend over time is to go shorter and easier. Example helicopter => chopper or helo [hee-lo] So will people drop "male" for start using 'cis-male"? No. Source- software engineer who was overexposed to PHds in lingustic…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 12:12 AM
17

Hidden camera time.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 03:05 AM
4

Get a lawyer. Now!. Don't tell her. Get a recorder, or cell phone and record her saying that she's going to fake a report that you abused her. then immediately take it to the police and report her and have them remove her from the house.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 03:04 AM
10

Being "pressured into it" is called coercion when it happen to a woman. So, it should also be treated as coercion when it happens to a man.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 01:59 AM
1

teachers aren't hired to think...... This makes me miserable.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 06:44 PM
2

I quite agree. In fact i said something similar to that.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:41 AM
3

from the story: In about 15 minutes, this doctor, this woman... she got out of her room and walked towards the stairs. I followed her, and basically asked her to stop. Me: Stop She: Yes? Me: We should get together this weekend. Her: Why? Me: We'll have fun. Maybe get a cup of coffee or something! Her: Get lost... So you follow her into a stairwell, and your opening is "stop" ? Then instead of asking her out out, you tell her that she should get together with you this weekend? All my sisters woul…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 12:53 AM
2

http://expertpages.com/news/taping_conversations.htm rules for all 50 states amnd DC
/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:20 PM
2

get a GOOD lawyer, Start to document how she is unfit mother. Lie like hell! pretend to still like her, while documenting her lack of fitness. let her think the two of you have a future together. 6 figure salary? Also hire a PI to document everything bad she does.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:51 PM
1

Probably a budgetary number which includes the overhead costs in addition to salary and benefits. eg - how much does the teachers classroom cost to maintain each year, Supplies for the class etc.. plus the salary, retirement, and healthcare. FYI- In high tech in 1984 the total cost per programmer was 250,000 per year
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:13 AM
5

Clearly someone does need to be accountable. I'd like to suggest that the process be started by teaching her to count. How many days since her last period might be a good subject to start with.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:08 AM
1

Actually, quite recently I was in a position where I had none of those. But I was still better off than a lot of people. How? I live in the USA, and I had a vehicle. And My Family.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:47 PM
-1

I begin to see the problem now. You're having trouble perceiving the possibilities of experiences that you have never had yourself. Tell me, what is the most physically painful thing you have ever experienced? What is the most mentally anguishing thing you have ever experienced?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:13 PM
-1

Yep. they have a place to live, and water and food and cable tv and they are out of the elements and they aren't in pain. That you think that's as low as things get indicates that You truly need an introduction to some of the harsher aspects of reality.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:23 PM
2

I think there is a certain minimum lack of misery that you need to achieve before you can reach "enjoy". Yes enjoyment can be a relative thing, but there are some absolute points on the range.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:06 AM
-4

Could you explain what you mean by that? It doesn't seem to fit in this context.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:03 AM
6

No. That is not true. Ever been hungry for weeks at a time? Or sick with no money for a doctor and in pain? Once you have enough to be fairly comfortable, then how much you have has almost no affect on happiness or how much you enjoy life. Before that level is reached, how much you don't have will make you pretty unhappy. It astonishes me how many people have no idea what it means to live without means.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:01 AM
9

Lol. Thanks! That was a joke, right? Have you ever seen how migrant workers live?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:58 AM
14

grew up in farming area. Women did all the same crop gathering work that men did. Mostly migrant workers. Hard hard work no matter what gender you are. As much as feminists would hate to admit it, women at the bottom generally have it better than men at the bottom. I guess that depends on what the financial bottom looks like wherever you are. I always thought it meant being homeless.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:56 AM
1

If you have visited them then you aren't making presumptions. he hasn't. My family has. So its actually a point in my favor.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 11:11 PM
28

Every single one of them who asked "where are you going in such a hurry, little girl?" was definitely a creeper. - thats got to be one the most patronizing, be-littleing ways to ask that. Its a total tip off. Its like asking if the girl wants a ride to jerkville.
/r/seduction05/01/13 04:32 PM
31

"Where are you headed in such a hurry, Kate?" This, right here: Someone just came up from behind me and tapped me on the shoulder. They asked me my name and I stupidly gave it to them because I was off balance. Now he wants to know where I'm going.... ?? WTF? I'll pick someplace safe. .. looks up Oh - that starbucks right there. Oh Crap, now he's coming with me! He's definitely stalking me. You did everything wrong. You did a perfect imitation of a creeper. 1 - approach from behind - Yep, behind…
/r/seduction05/01/13 04:26 PM
1

I suggest following the bbc news programs. They seem to have a much more neutral perspective on most thing when compared to US media outlets.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:02 AM
6

damn straight. And Men everywhere should, can and do fight for decency.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:20 AM
2

does what all the time and what is just a coincidence. And have you ever visited these countries? Please write so that your logic chains are clear and link up. the best way to do that is to only use pronouns after your statement has established the subject or object the pronoun refers to. Remember, I'm not reading the thread you are in. I see only your reply, alone, by itself, in my messages box.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 12:58 AM
2

You're going to have to explain that.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 12:57 AM
12

"The thing about it is that there probably isn't a rape problem in India whatsoever...." How many and what countries besides the USA have you visited in your lifetime? Unlike modern, western-style countries, girls in the third world, especially in India and china, are treated very poorly. My adopted daughter came from an orphanage in china. In that orphanage of 130 or so babies, there were 5 boy infants. The rest were all girls. The boy babies were disabled, clearly the reason why they were aban…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 11:52 PM
3

My wife hates when I do that. Apparently she doesn't get asked to coffee for weeks after.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 01:17 AM
3

actually there are differences. Some of them are in the brain tissues, some of them are in the shape of the hip bones, some are in the skeleton of the upper torso and some are in the shape of the skull. There are further differences in the ratios of fast twitch muscle tissue versus slow twitch. Interestingly the most significant of all the differences may be the ones in the brain tissues.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 12:07 AM
1

Do you have one of those knives with the air cartridge in it for exploding things from the inside out? Or is that what a ballistic knife is?
/r/MensRights26/12/12 12:02 AM
1

/me notes poster's nick.... :-)
/r/MensRights25/12/12 11:59 PM
3

Nailed it, sir. :-)
/r/MensRights25/12/12 11:58 PM
1

Only certain mosquitoes. Most species of mosquito don't carry it and of those that do, most mosquitoes of that species don't carry it either. In the end its the disease that's really responsible.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 11:56 PM
2

A gun that fits in a drawer won't do squat against hippo, either. :-D
/r/MensRights25/12/12 11:53 PM
1

Yep, every time I don't kill someone. :-) ( I commute in Massachusetts.... every fucking day..... )
/r/MensRights25/12/12 11:51 PM
4

When I first heard about women who started this, (selling clothes out of their homes), it was in the early 1980's. They added the no men policy after some of them were attacked. My point here is that this may not be as blatant a discrimination as it appears to be. For it definitely appears to be.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 11:50 PM
2

Typo: you meant to say: My laws are harsh, but harsh.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 10:16 PM
1

Cue or clue? (I originally asked because I do use SR software and that's the kind of error it makes?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:11 PM
1

typical no because patriarchy response and your >>>queue<<< Spagma - are you using speech recognition? If yes, which one? Dragon, Microsoft, Google etc... ?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:57 PM
1

And name names in that book. That makes it real to the world and that girl will have some explaining to do. I bet the old boyfriend knows the truth by now too. He should be interviewed.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 04:45 PM
1

All I know is the world undering down ender?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 04:24 AM
1

URL?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:49 AM
1

'Androphobic-paranoia' better?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:29 AM
1

right, great. Now every one will want to be a porn star....
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:27 AM
2

Your summary is correct and your response to it is honest and real. Here's how to deal with it: Embrace it. Have fun with it. The girls who respond to this approach are the ones you'll really want to be with in the long run anyway. :-) "Hey, wanna go to a film and see what develops?" "Lets go mini-golfing and putt around!" "Go out for a bite and see what we can nibble on?"
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:51 PM
3

by preventing her from leaving, they were already committing a crime, a serious one. Called kidnapping. Yes, what they did was not abduction, but could be charged as kidnapping. What do we call it when someone is keeping you somewhere against your will? yes, she could have gone back in the store- maybe... we don't know what they would have done if she had moved in that direction instead of bluffing them off. They might have blocked her from going back to the store.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:25 AM
2

you are right, but she didn't realize that.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:22 AM
6

You are not an asshole, but neither was she. These men were preventing her from leaving, and doing so in an aggressive, intimidating fashion. If this were just a pick up attempt, the first one would not have blocked her door and prevented her from getting in the car. Also if this were a normal pick up attempt, the second one would not have been boxing her in from behind. He would have been far enough away to give them some sort of privacy. From the way they had themselves arranged, it was very l…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:20 AM
3

Yes, the problem is your sister didn't know that she could already charge them with attempted kidnapping. We need a standard class in how to behave and be legal for people to take when they turn 18, 16, 14,
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:29 AM
5

Not only are the guys creeps, they were using intimidation and implicit threats Oh and they committed at least one Federal level violent crime., at least a felony and potentially a capitol offense. By blocking her access to her vehicle, he was preventing her from leaving, and that's a federal crime called "kidnapping". (yes, that's one of the ways to get charged with kidnapping). All she would have to tell the police is that he was blocking her from getting in her car and keeping her from leavin…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:24 AM
0

certain native American Tribes always gave their captives to the women to be tortured, since (or so the explanation goes) they were so much crueler. Or was it just they were angrier?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:04 AM
7

except this is not a gender issue,. its an "obedience to perceived authority" issue. The result today would be very different because this issue has been raised so much since then and more people are aware of the need to constantly question 'authority'. Edit, at least I am. I saw the initial milgram experiment (in a made for TV dramatization called "The Tenth Level") in about 1975. I was horrified. I was also about 15 years old. I was scarred for life and never trusted authority figures very muc…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:01 AM
4

never found out. That group was deep in the Amazon jungle and couldn't be reached.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:00 AM
4

Please note that the time when this experiment was done, The US culture was very different. IIRC this was done in the 1950's or 60's. Women today are much less subservient then they were then. Ironically, men are more subservient than they were then. [ Ok milgram's was 1962, the puppy one, 1973] How would it turn out today? it would be very different I expect. So many people have been exposed to the issues of authoritarianism and conformity. I suspect most republican-like thinking people would k…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:59 AM
3

I see. OK, so they are misusing outlier samples. You also made the statement that: "there is a significant amount of sexism both in this sub and in the movement" and I was looking for some samples to support that part of about this sub-reddit. I haven't been here long and frankly, I am intimidated by the the idea of being identified as a some kind of hate monger, so I am watching for exactly those kinds of hate posts. If I see them here and they get general support here, I'll know this is not th…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:05 PM
3

When I first started reading this sub, there was some talk here about how SRS was making people here uncomfortable. Could that have something to do with it? on the other hand /r/atheism has 1.3? million people in it, but only a tiny handful of them actually post. Perhaps this is similar?
/r/MensRights25/11/12 10:42 PM
1

doch, I'm rather new to all this. Can you please point out some examples of misogynistic sexist comments in this subreddit? I mean ones that received general support from this subreddit, rather than being called out? I'm having trouble understanding a lot of things in here.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 10:39 PM
2

This does not deal with his desire to not go overseas. " I never want to go over there again"
/r/MensRights24/11/12 10:51 PM
1

In Massachusetts, In an owner occupied building with less than four units, the landlord can specify things like this, because it is considered to be sharing their home. Caveat: This was true when I got my real estate license in 1983. Its quite possible the laws have changed since then, but I haven't heard of such a change. I'm not active in real estate so there wouldn't be any reason I would run across the change.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 01:43 AM
-7

You're not crazy. In fact its gotten so bad I've decided I'll never have consensual sex with women again because its just too dangerous. Instead I plan to kidnap and rape on purpose just so I can engineer the circumstances so my identity will never be known. That will be much safer for me. edit - for the down voters - this is satire folks, its supposed to have an edge. :)
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:25 AM
3

Not if the postings above are true.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 04:54 AM
2

Wouldn't a serious weight lifter need a serious weight gym? No in-building gym would be servicing an exercise profile of that extreme nature. Gyms in Hotels and residential buildings are just for people trying to keep in shape. treadmills and stairclimbers help with that. Serious weight lifters need different equipment that isn't normally going to be part of a typical in-house gym.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:51 AM
1

offender registries gotta go? Well, there many sexual act that are outrightly criminal, all violent rape for example. The registries do serve a valid purpose. If you want to see some changes regarding if teens involved in consensual sex are put on it, I think that is already happening. I agree, women and men should have the same penalties for the same crimes.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 01:32 PM
-5

Ah, another marriage that has too much time on reddit, gaming and/or porn in it!
/r/MensRights08/11/12 05:53 PM
-18

Very crudely put and frankly wrong in the context being discussed. Some couples have to work very hard and go to extreme lengths to become pregnant. Sex becomes entirely irrelevant. In the context being discussed, "Do pregnant women need a seat on the bus more than a person with a broken leg or other disability?" The act of having or not having had sex to become pregnant has absolutely no bearing in the discussion. (to see my position on this, see my other post here. Its long so I wont repeat it…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:55 PM
24

Being pregnant is not a disability or an illness. (I'm a twin, and I thought my mom had it tough, doing two, until I met a mother who had triplets. When we chatted She said "Oh I would've killed to have twins!" as she pushed her triple stroller through Sears.. ) You have it wrong, this is the order: Top priority: People for whom it is dangerous to try to stand on a moving vehicle This includes (in any order): Old people with brittle bones and movement problems Injured veterans with any severe le…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:30 PM
2

I am sorry to hear about what happened. Have you been able to get any help with finding shelter? Do you need any help? I believe reddit has some resources that can give you some hints. Please feel free to contact me by private message if you need a few tips and may the Gods/Goddesses (if indeed they be), smile upon you and your future. Silver lining, you will be better off without that person as your partner. Edit - I've been reading too many web comics. You nickname is scary! See bottom panel -…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:02 PM
4

you did nothing wrong. In order to have every one be treated equally, a person's gender should not have been any part of the considered points. She clearly expected special treatment because of her gender. She is not a feminist, she's just an asshole.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 03:57 AM
1

I would love to turn this in to a "help me find qualified people!" thread, but with the SRS doxxing that's going on there's no way I'm letting this account get anywhere near my personal information. Very sane of you. There is a way to turn this into a help you find qualified people thread without hazarding doxxing. Rough idea is something like this: Open a new gmail account, obviously don't connect any of your real trackable info to it. Publish the job requirements, and state the minimum require…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:48 PM
1

um, ah .. right there, er no, thats not... ... I guess you didn't. My bad. sorry. :)
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:17 AM
1

Was jailbait depicting underage kids in sexual ways, eg - clothed but suggestive body language or poses? Would a subreddit named "PicsBeautifulKids" have been treated differently?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 05:46 PM
0

Actually social scientists have found that anger and vengance is the basis for civil society. Anger is basis for cooperation in society "It's not love, affection or even blatant self-interest that binds human societies together - it's anger, according to Swiss researchers. They made the unsettling discovery while trying to fathom what makes people cooperate."
/r/MensRights12/10/12 04:44 PM
1

I think your idea of banning SRS is valid. What do we do to make this happen?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 04:40 PM
1

I curse their sudden but inevitable betrayal.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 04:39 PM
1

The court system has no room for fairness in it. The basic premise of our legal system is that you hire the meanest nastiest scumbag you can find to fight and lie for your side. With both side doing this, each side is supposed to end up with a good representation of their side. To bad that never happens.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:46 PM
1

I think there is a lot more of "men are temporarily useful, ultimately disposable" then there used to be and that it is growing exponentially.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:38 PM
1

How many men do you think will opt out? How many men are a critical mass. I, sadly, suggest to you that the latter is orders of magnitude larger than the former.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:37 PM
1

You need to report this girl to the health department, or whatever licensing body is in charge of laser electrolysis. People need to know she attacked a person's genitals with a laser. She needs to lose her license so that no other people are attacked. Seriously. This is not funny or trivial, as you indicate above. It was a crime of physical violence.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:22 PM
1

<waves> Another over here. Software (Speech recog and etc..)
/r/MensRights10/10/12 03:57 AM
1

no and no, at least I think not. :-)
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:09 PM
6

Ahem - The automatics now available, and for at least the last 5 years often get higher mileage than manual transmission vehicles. Look for automatics that have 5 or six speed transmissions.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 06:33 AM
1

Great, and since you have no interest in owning slaves, posters falsely depicting others as abducting people into slavery won't interest you either.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 12:50 AM
2

reading books doesn't tell one how to think. It offers you the chance to consider multiple points of view. NOTE: this is not an endorsement of either position in the above thread. It is an endorsement of reading or learning about many different perspectives into a complex area of important thought that affects all of humanity.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:40 PM
1

There is the concept of "contributory negligence" which I wont bother with at this time. OK - you see a diamond ring left on the dashboard of an open car. Is it OK to steal it? No. We all know its not OK to steal it. Do we all know its not OK to rape a drunk person? Mostly we do. Except ... when we are drunk too? See my rant in here on alcohol.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:14 AM
1

"People have a right to get drunk without getting harmed." WHAT???? NO! , being drunk IS HARMFUL Not ONLY TO YOURSELF, BUT TO EVERYONE IN RANGE. Getting a mild buzz on is not being "drunk". Anyone who gets drunk is deliberately risking harm, even just as simply as from tripping and breaking your neck. Yes I'm aware that the context of this discussion is supposed to be rape, but this statement is too wrong IN ANY CONTEXT to be ignored! I am (roughly) 3 times your age and I grew up in an era when …
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:57 AM
1

Of course. Doesn't everybody? If they don't, then they should.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:02 PM
1

I'm afraid that's not the question I was asking. Perhaps I should rephrase it, around what year do you think this abuse started? E.g. when in time, not when in the age of a person's life. The reason I ask, is that I perceived a shift in the feminist movement from an appropriate resistance against discrimination and abuse/quest for liberation into an inappropriate and abusive movement at a certain point in my life. So this raises the question, has feminism always been like this, or did feminism e…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:52 PM
2

sounds like it has potential. Question: Around what time do you think this abuse started? What generation/years of sons are the ones so affected?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:11 AM
1

yes, not only would the school be reasonable to expel a person who made a default accusation, I believe that the school would have just as strong an obligation to expel that person as they would have to expel a person they believed had committed a sexual attack. While attacks on a person's reputation are never perceived to be as harmful as physical attacks, frankly I believe they can be even more harmful by harming a person's perception by the community and all of their future potential that can…
/r/MensRights16/09/12 01:35 AM
1

I'm sorry, your point is not well made. It's neither logical nor reasonable. It is, however, adequate for a 14-year-old Redditors. Oh, I should say it is adequate for an eight-year-old Redditor. A 14-year-old is capable of understanding the argument in formulating a fairly reasonable response.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 01:33 AM
1

I think your point is well made, but I do disagree with it. While the justice system presumes innocence, to protect innocent people from being harmed by a presumption of guilt which would affect the trial process, the rest of humanity makes no such effort of protection. Just because a person was not found guilty, does not mean they did not commit the act. The possibility that he did commit the act still remains. Please note, that I am not saying he did commit the act. I am saying that the fact o…
/r/MensRights16/09/12 01:31 AM
2

"I'm Ok with you dressing anyway you want. I wont rape you. But don't blame me if other less civilized people try to. I believe in your rights, but I also know that its stupid to think animals believe in them too. "
/r/MensRights13/09/12 04:38 AM
4

um I'd go a little deeper than that. feminist means different things to different people.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 02:26 AM
1

and also can't read anymore..........
/r/MensRights11/09/12 02:22 AM
9

Wow, interesting. IIRC Her point was actually that a friend of hers, who is lesbian couldn't get birth control pills that she needed to control the growth of cysts because the health care plan she had wouldn't pay for 'birth control' even if it was being used to control a medical issue. As for using the law to silence Limbaugh, I say let him talk. He's one of the best friends the democrats have. The more he talks, the more people realize that only an idiot would agree with him. (I say that and I…
/r/MensRights09/09/12 11:01 PM
1

Not if you ask it politely and of course you don't use is to be deliberately annoying. Try to use some judgement. Use of the phrase , combined with a cooperative attitude and polite speech will work pretty well, or er - better than other things. :) The phrase sends a message that you are one of the few people who understands their rights. the cooperative attitude and politeness send the message that you respect the officers and understand they are doing their job. Those two messages will hopeful…
/r/MensRights03/09/12 06:59 PM
0

Actually, with me, there's no telling. You don't know my history. :-D Tough guy is the wrong label.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 06:48 PM
3

Ja, also in this situation, remember to stay out of range if you can...
/r/MensRights03/09/12 04:46 AM
-3

She's lucky you were there, I'd have hooked two fingers under her collarbone and snapped it in two yanking her out of the ambulance
/r/MensRights03/09/12 04:42 AM
3

If the police stop you, be polite and ask them what you did wrong. If they say you didn't do anything wrong, then ask "am I free to go then? I'm headed to the grocery store and I'd like to get there while there is still a good selection of apples (or whatever) they always run out of good ones early" If they ask for ID, technically they can't insist, as a practical matter it will speed things up and make them less suspicious if you happily provide it... sucks but thats the way it is. After each s…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 06:14 PM
5

sexism, as racism is discrimination based on race, sexism is discrimination based on sex (gender). So yes, women can be and often are sexist. The weird part is, some women are sexist against other women! But typically, when a female is sexist, its against men.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:26 PM
0

What the feminists fail to realize is that the men whose actions have created all the ire the feminists have, are a small minority of all men. The problem is, that group of men are typically aggressor/aggressive males, and it is those males who end up in the most visible places in society. These men ALWAYS take advantage, of everyone, regardless of gender of who they exploit. They are also typically more sociopathic which includes being more charming. So the problem is that the feminists have mi…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 02:23 PM
-12

TITLE was wrong. Player was not found innocent. Player was not prosecuted. Charges were dropped. School is well within its rights to expel player as they believe he did the act.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:39 AM
2

Preferable for human adults who are familiar with the concept of non-verbal communication, which comprises the majority of human communication.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 04:23 AM
2

"ah did naht have sex with thayat wohman." Thank you Mr. President. According to the clinton whitehouse, oral sex, isn't sex. :-)
/r/MensRights28/08/12 04:18 AM
3

I dont think I've ever seen an official policy that was so clearly wrong. Please, if you have access to the original text, post here in this sub-reddit. This needs to neutralized. Two adults, engage in oral sex, they proceed, together, albeit one of them is more passive, to full intrcourse. There is no question that the more passive partner has consented to sexual intercourse. Why? because in order for no to mean no, there has to be some kind of "no". It can be anything- a hand held up palm faci…
/r/MensRights28/08/12 04:13 AM
8

No, never threaten. That gives them time to prepare a counter move.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 01:52 AM
5

Lawyer; Do not notify wife, Bring lawyer and police officer to the school with you thenext time you want to pick up the kid. Have the principal arrested for child kidnap if she/he refuses to release your child to you.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 01:26 AM
2

True, when you're shot as a deserter, they don't have to pay you. Even Mercenary outfits don't allow desertion.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 10:44 PM
-1

um, no, I don't think they can. If they could, they would walk off the job everytime they were needed to go into a harsh battle.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 08:37 PM
1

I never registered. I vote. I was about 17 when the requirement to register for the draft was dropped. (near end of the Vietnam war police action.)
/r/MensRights19/08/12 08:35 PM
0

well you certainly defeated his logic with that response.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:15 AM
1

Perhaps its time for BuSab to make some adjustments to the Judiciary. See "the Dosadii experiment" Frank Herbert
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:35 PM
1

Keep doing that. you clearly have a judge with a bias and any little thing that even looks wrong on your side, they'll ding you for.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:34 PM
1

Heh. That never bothered the judge in my divorce case when I was unrepresented. Did the judge buy into that?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:01 PM
1

I assume you carefully write down each and every one of these things the instant you learn about them, noting the date and time? yes?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:18 AM
1

nope, I was attacking her. :-) I'm sorry if it sounded like I was upset with you. I'm upset with her. <insert sound of viscous dog barking and growling>
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:29 PM
1

But I also said that we shouldn't stereotype all women to be like this yes, and no where did I say all women are like this. I said: We can call it acting like an intrusive asshole, no matter what gender did it and she should absolutely be called out for it. Did you just not read it? Or do you somehow construe that as saying all women are like that?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:24 PM
1

We can call it acting like an intrusive asshole, no matter what gender did it and she should absolutely be called out for it. Find her, take her picture and post it. I'm sure she frequents that store often because she wouldn't feel safe doing that shit anywhere but her home turf.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:38 PM
2

CT: AHEM YTS;CR: He HAS NO MONEY.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 09:14 PM
2

BZZZT - Just checked NHTSA's website for statistics, and its closer to a ratio of 3 to 1, or 2 to 1. Men are responsible more often, but nowhere near 94%. That's so exaggerated its just plain dishonest. Young adult drivers 21 - 25 F/M: 24% to 76%, a 1 to 3 ratio. slowly goes down to over 65 F/M: 43% to 57%, almost 1 to 1. see the bottom of the first page. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/810853.pdf edit - punctuation, spacing, clarity.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 01:00 AM
1

Is it time to pass a law to makes decisions like this a capitol offense? That is, the judge would be found guilty of a capitol offense?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:17 PM
3

hmm, I read it all in Forrest Gump's voice.... i fail.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 04:27 AM
7

Just stupid cultural conditioning. Ignore it. You probably passed up some really interesting diseases.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 04:25 AM
1

I suggest framing it thus: In certain circumstances both women and men have been horribly, unfairly treated. Yes Women have historically been victimized much more than men, but both genders have been victimized. Fair and just treatment for ALL the people, ALL the time is what we need. Injustice is evil ALL the time no matter who it happens to.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 09:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter