TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GeorgeOlduvai Archive

View 13 posts and 719 comments by GeorgeOlduvai on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
237

GeneralGeorgeOlduvai/r/MensRights14/06/23 02:47 AM
34

GeorgeOlduvai/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:06 AM
28

WBBGeorgeOlduvai/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:08 PM
24

GeorgeOlduvai/r/MensRights20/08/11 02:25 AM
15

GeorgeOlduvai/r/MensRights28/06/13 05:52 AM
13

GeorgeOlduvai/r/MensRights09/01/13 09:10 AM
6

GeorgeOlduvai/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:59 AM
6

GeorgeOlduvai/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:57 AM
4

GeorgeOlduvai/r/MensRights08/07/13 09:14 AM
3

GeorgeOlduvai/r/MensRights19/11/13 07:32 PM
2

RagebaitGeorgeOlduvai/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:29 AM
2

DiscriminationGeorgeOlduvai/r/MensRights11/10/14 05:52 AM
0

GeorgeOlduvai/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:03 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I wonder if Japanese has different words for different kinds of love. English doesn't really differentiate, so that partially explains Western shipping.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 08:25 PM
8

Issues of modesty perhaps?
/r/MensRights24/06/23 07:49 PM
1

Costs more due to ingredients, R&D costs, etc.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 09:22 PM
1

Quite often, it's not the same product. Similar, yes, but not the same. Shampoo, conditoners, etc. They're presented as the same because they're both shampoo; they're different products when one bothers to look at the ingredients.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 09:17 PM
5

Lena Dunham's Girls is an excellent example of this. Short, fat, and dumpy woman is pursued constantly throughout the run of the show by guys at least an order of magnitude more attractive.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 03:02 PM
2

This occurs most often in people who have never had real friendships. They are unable to recognise agape or philios for what it is, so they assume it's actually eros. The most obvious example is Sam/Frodo.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 02:57 PM
18

The study is based partially on the false study conducted in Africa some years ago. They use that debunked study to push for "informing" men about the "benefits" vis a vis HIV/STIs. What a load of crap.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:13 PM
9

I made more working the kitchen than my wife did working out front. I did, however, work in one of the few restaurants that tipped out back-of-house.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 12:45 AM
2

Clive Cussler has a wonderful novel about this subject. Shock Wave. The 13th Dirk Pitt book.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 05:39 PM
2

You're welcome. Enlightening, is it not?
/r/MensRights14/04/23 01:47 AM
19

When I realized that the people telling me to "man up" were exclusively women. 19 or so.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 10:16 PM
1

That one too, although it was because he forged paperwork that resulted in the death in said tyrant. He faces boards a couple times as I recall. The kid kiss may have gotten mixed up for me there.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 09:10 PM
3

Chase faces a disciplinary board for it eventually IIRC.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 05:07 PM
35

"Impeccable character" commits fraud
/r/MensRights28/03/23 09:07 PM
1

He legally cannot. I have no doubt he was overjoyed but that should mean nothing in the face of the law.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 07:18 PM
9

She's also an idiot who didn't follow instructions, which is the actual problem.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 05:26 PM
5

It's even simpler. The app asks you to choose replacements. If you do not choose a replacement item, the shopper is told to choose a substitute. Some shoppers will check with you if they have to do this, some don't. She did not choose a replacement and either did not respond to messages or wasn't sent one. Either way the second half goes, she is at fault ultimately.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 05:25 PM
6

Skip to main content Turn off refresh Subscribe Sign In 6 MONTHS FOR 99¢ ACT NOW Most popular Monday night storm could be biggest in two years Law Beat: Two well-known lawyers in area's legal community die Springsteen postpones Albany concert due to illness Battle is waged over LED lights in rural upstate village Illness cancels another Springsteen concert UConn-Iona headlines NCAA men's basketball field at MVP Arena Photos: Albany's St. Patrick's parade NY Troopers PBA removes political directo…
/r/MensRights13/03/23 04:01 PM
9

I would've walked out.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 06:32 PM
1

I'm betting on "oral services".
/r/MensRights09/03/23 05:09 PM
3

Oh man, I remember him. Wild times.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 06:41 PM
4

Possibly connected to her death.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 07:10 PM
2

It was originally when a man explained something to a woman, condescendingly or not, who knows more about the subject than the man. It quickly devolved into any man explaining anything to any woman in a manner perceived to be condescending by the woman.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 07:35 PM
9

Psycho woman films herself in gym doing stupid shit. Video also has a dude who looks at her. She decides the dude is a creep and calls for his doxxing and possible murder. Gets called out, makes the whole thing about "teh wimminz".
/r/MensRights06/02/23 03:26 PM
48

This divide has been especially stark for me over the course of 30 years working in kitchens. Backnof house is almost always entirely male, front of house is almost entirely female. Guess which group functions as a team with little friction, clearly defined roles, and camaraderie.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 06:17 PM
2

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thetimes.co.uk%2Farticle%2Fdomestic-abuse-service-overhauled-after-male-victims-bias-complaint-jz07mnh99
/r/MensRights07/01/23 03:18 AM
3

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thetimes.co.uk%2Farticle%2Fdomestic-abuse-service-overhauled-after-male-victims-bias-complaint-jz07mnh99
/r/MensRights07/01/23 03:18 AM
8

They mentioned Tate in a non-negative manner. That's all it seems to take. At least one mod here hates the dude with a passion.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 08:49 PM
2

Bad bot. You didn't correct loose to lose.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:05 PM
1

Yes, that's a given.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:44 PM
2

Haven't excused him for anything.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:12 AM
17

Good point. The thing with Tate, as with so many before him, is that he's isn't necessarily wrong in what he says but that he appears to go out of his way to say it in the most assholish way possible in order to generate outrage. He's a douchebag and possibly actually criminal but he isn't completely wrong about some stuff.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:20 AM
43

Fair enough. I think Tate's a piece of shit (human trafficker or not) but your point is valid.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:02 AM
74

She doesn't write her own tweets anymore than Biden does.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:53 AM
3

If they were, they would have. They haven't, so they aren't. Seems pretty straightforward to me. I'm sure they'd tell me they're being held back by tHe PaTrIaRcHy because women's pain is dismissed by men or some other bullshit excuse.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:33 AM
9

They still don't have a women's NBA that's as good as the male one. Never will.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:29 AM
3

Doesn't bother me in the slightest. What bothers me is the double standard.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 02:54 AM
1

Well clearly, they're the superior sex. I mean, how else can one explain the absolute domination of all the fields required to maintain the civilization built by...oh, wait. They're still responding to me in the thread, completely unable to understand that the problems which would develop aren't because the jobs can only be done by men but because they are only done by men. Just more proof they live in a fantasy world in which they can do anything ("backwards and in heels") but don't actually do…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 11:27 PM
4

That whole thread is hilarious. Women everywhere declaring it'd be fine and refusing to look at the stats. I posted this at a couple of them and they lost their minds denying it. Edit- 11 hours later and they're still building fantasy castles and declaring that the original hypothetical question isn't actually hypothetical and is very narrow in scope ("It's about being able to walk alone at night not about all men disappearing!"). Pathetic creatures proving the point.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:09 PM
-2

Um, yes they are.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 03:42 AM
5

When a character is described as going "white as a sheet", it's pretty obvious they're not black.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 03:35 AM
1

You're still operating under a false assumption because that isn't what I said, no matter how badly your reading comprehension has failed you.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 05:12 PM
3

You still don't get it. Amazing. The attempts are self reported. One must live to self report. The discrepancy is explained by men choosing more concrete (sometimes literally) methods. Pay attention. Deaths aren't the issue being discussed. Attempts are. Last time. Shoo.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 11:16 PM
6

Your first statement is (was, before your edit) the point of the post. Your second statement is (was, before your edit) my point. One more time, since you seem a little slow: one must survive to self-report an attempt. This skews the numbers and tells us that "attempts" are a terrible metric, yet it's the one that gets focussed on; much like 25% of the homeless being women. Edit - nice edit you've got there. Try to read this carefully. You don't seem to understand the subject under discussion.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 09:42 PM
4

Yep. Men tend to commit fully, choosing a method with no saving throw (so to speak).
/r/MensRights13/12/22 09:37 PM
23

Exactly. When men decide to do it, they get it done. Gun, jump, truly destructive methods with little to no way to be saved.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 09:34 PM
2

We're discussing attempts vs successes. When men choose to die, they do a better job of it.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 09:33 PM
6

Yep. I've heard similar stories from 2 friends who "attempted". Both have barely visible scars running the wrong way (across)
/r/MensRights13/12/22 08:44 PM
8

In order to provide a self-report, one must survive. The most survivable attempts are poisonings. The most common method of attempt for women is poisoning. Follow the logic.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 08:14 PM
3

The 3 to 1 variance in attempts and successes is easily explained by method. Men shoot themselves, jump, or otherwise choose methods that tend not to go wrong. Women have a tendency to poison themselves and call someone. A pumped stomach is easy.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 07:59 PM
35

Pam Grier in 74 and Carrie Fischer in 77 too.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 12:50 AM
1

r selectors vs. K selectors, simple as. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory
/r/MensRights01/11/22 03:25 PM
1

Entitlement culture. Simple as.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 04:55 PM
4

I'd wager they already have. Are there female teachers? If so, then they've infiltrated.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 07:57 PM
11

Because then they'd have to acknowledge who is killing most of the black men.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 02:34 PM
67

The only winning move is not to play.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 07:07 PM
1

That's not a good comparison. Wikipedia vs. Urban dictionary. It's also not google.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 08:18 PM
2

Frankly, no. They'd make it about women.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:27 AM
18

r/titlegore It's the Daily Mail, so I shouldn't be surprised but still.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 08:01 PM
14

Posted fairly regularly. Have a look. I'll give you one to chew on while you look for others. http://www.newscastmedia.com/domestic-violence.htm
/r/MensRights27/12/21 09:40 PM
24

If you think men are the main perpetrators, you may want to try checking this sub for the actual stats.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 09:27 PM
17

r/titlegore
/r/MensRights14/12/21 06:12 PM
52

Norah Vincent, Self Made Man
/r/MensRights10/02/21 09:52 PM
2

No problem neighbour. There appears to be a mens shelter in Halifax and I believe there is another in Toronto (run by CCMF). So a grand total of 4 in North America. Sad.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 12:38 AM
5

His name was Earl Silverman and he was Canadian (unless there's a similar story in the US). Edit - added a link to his story
/r/MensRights01/02/21 12:12 AM
22

10 years, 8 of which were suspended. Plus 6 months for the flash police statement. Still a joke.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 10:35 PM
2

Ah, Kimmel. Thank you.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 08:58 PM
1

Which male feminist was that?
/r/MensRights31/01/21 08:45 PM
8

MensLib is a feminist centered sub. All men's problems must be examined through the lens of feminism. As for TakeittorCirclejerk...I swear they used to be active here as an MRA. Have I mis-remembered?
/r/MensRights27/01/21 04:33 AM
10

Some do. They tend to be introverted men, whether due to natural inclination or lack of social grace. A woman who approaches them is easier to deal with than the anxious feeling that comes with approaching the woman.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/20 06:31 PM
2

That also tends to be the first step towards a lawsuit. Women can have their own spaces because they need shelter from the male gaze or other nonsense. Men must be monitored at all times for the protection of the image of women.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 01:38 AM
3

Cat-calling. I expect there was a translation error.
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/20 02:28 AM
1

I think it's supposed to say "world".
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/20 08:32 PM
1

I read them and it didn’t take long for my men’s rights beliefs to start falling away. They didn’t stand up to all the empirical evidence I was finally reading – research that was informed by feminist theory and offered actual solutions. Oh my Lord, we've got a live one!
/r/MensRights30/03/20 06:15 PM
1

Is there are better crop somewhere? This one cuts off just before thebposyer cam say anything relating to the title.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 03:51 PM
8

Thank you. I suppose I should have guessed. Be well!
/r/MensRights27/03/20 01:44 AM
19

TRT?
/r/MensRights27/03/20 01:03 AM
3

Norah Vincent
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:36 PM
1

Essay can be found here
/r/MensRights06/03/20 10:10 PM
18

They'll blame men. "They didnt support us! They wouldn't help!" Etc.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 06:04 PM
3

My first thought: "how is she in between man1 and man2? One is sitting in the back, the other in the front."
/r/MensRights19/01/20 07:12 PM
8

The Donald isn't about constructive discussion. It's a 24/7 MAGA rally, that's the point.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 06:50 PM
5

Sort of both really. They dress down when no men are around so as to reduce their relative attractiveness, thusly avoiding comparison or insult. They dress up when men are around and this sets off other women.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 05:33 AM
1

Thank you. First reasonable price I've seen for something that isn't ugly as sin.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 07:07 PM
1

Ah. The image search doesn't do it justice then.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 12:10 PM
5

What's the difference?
/r/MensRights23/12/19 12:07 PM
4

If only they weren't so goddamn expensive.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 11:12 AM
16

Huh. I thought he was going for lululemon.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 11:07 AM
6

The sub symbol would suffice I'd think.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 06:29 PM
2

You have some good points; presenting them in a hostile manner renders them virtually useless.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 08:26 PM
14

The latter portion of your statement is the answer.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 07:43 PM
2

I can honestly say I have never and would never do such a thing. Enjoy in 40 minutes bucko.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 10:44 PM
3

Up to you neighbour. It's remarkably tame.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 10:40 PM
2

Nothing shows, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 10:37 PM
4

here you go
/r/MensRights15/11/19 10:33 PM
14

Told by single mothers and female educators.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 09:45 PM
2

Follow the original "live" link, copy link, open a new window and go to archive.is and paste the live link into the box. Archive will then take you to a page (either a previous archive, if one exists, or a new one if not) which is the archived copy. Copy the address given and paste it wherever is necessary.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 10:30 PM
28

Archive copy
/r/MensRights02/11/19 04:55 AM
1

I didn't see a link to the actual paper anywhere in the article, did I miss it?
/r/MensRights31/10/19 12:06 PM
8

More or less. Look up Kellogg (he of the cereal). Was also IIRC a proponent of using a dab of acid on girls clitorises for the same purpose.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 12:31 PM
6

This is my thought process everytime I see someone post about a day in Iceland in 1975. All the women refused to do any work and the men were apparently hopeless. Imagine what happens if all the men refuse to do anything. Chaos and destruction follow.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:14 PM
4

Iceland tried to pass a law for genital integrity for boys last year IIRC. Shut down by the jewish community there.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 05:58 PM
4

Dude, punctuation exists for a reason. Your posts are difficult to read.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 02:20 AM
3

Pluralist article
/r/MensRights08/09/19 02:14 AM
7

There was one in Calgary, until the founder and operator committed suicide. I think there might be one in Toronto currently.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 03:25 PM
5

I almost get the feeling it's an advanced bot, sometimes being run directly. The lack of punctuation and capitalization makes it seem real but the occasional complete failure of grammar, context, and syntax makes wonder.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 03:19 AM
22

Priority obesity treadmills. They can generate power whilst getting healthy.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 03:15 AM
3

Technically three rights make a regressive left.😁
/r/MensRights23/08/19 03:01 AM
2

When you're not strong, I'll be your friend, I'll help you...carry on...
/r/MensRights23/08/19 02:26 AM
0

Was your post a comment on another post or an initial post? Context would be helpful.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 02:13 AM
4

Feminists didn't create the term Mens Rights Activist, it was/is a natural outgrowth of Mens Rights Movement. Feminists used it in such a way, that with the help of the MSM, it became toxic in the eyes of the general public.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 02:05 AM
2

I'd agree that American black males are treated very poorly by the justice system etc but I'd also suggest that BLM is just another player in the Oppression Olympics. BLM, to me, seems much more about bringing intersectional progressivism to a group that would normally reject the stack.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 02:00 AM
1

Dakimakura for those, like me, who had/would have had to look it up.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 01:54 AM
-1

Possibly because it hasn't anything to do with the topic of the sub?
/r/MensRights23/08/19 01:33 AM
3

Archive so as to not give the Atlantic anymore clicks than absolutely necessary
/r/MensRights22/08/19 10:43 PM
1

Not a clue, just a little factoid I found in my Anatomy and Physiology textbook.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:03 AM
7

Also to labs who grow skin grafts.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 12:36 AM
7

Yep.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/19 11:32 AM
2

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Eh2PjkzW20w
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 10:45 PM
6

What a bunch of twisted logic and bullshit that site is.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:46 PM
3

Why ever on Earth would we want to choose based on what's in between their ears when we could do so based on the colour of what's between their legs? C'mon.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 11:24 PM
2

They know perfectly well what their readers are thinking: "I need to be a victim!"
/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:38 PM
3

Seems from what I've heard they have been struggling before this. Only gonna get worse now.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 09:28 PM
2

These dress codes tend to be from schools. Professional attire us something different.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:13 AM
41

I think they just shorten that to incel.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 07:40 PM
2

Good bot
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:34 PM
1

I'd hazard a guess the World Bank is taking the total value of all wealth in the US and then using median female spending to get 1%. HBR is probably looking at total money spent and adding all female purchases together. Or something similar.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 10:47 PM
8

That is being claimed as fake. It was amusing to hear the CBC have to talk about Chads and Stacies though.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 04:11 AM
1

I have one of her books somewhere. I may have to get around to reading it. 😁
/r/MensRights22/04/18 02:12 AM
2

Anne MacCaffrey did a pretty good job IMHO.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 12:51 AM
5

Do you have any idea how much extra fuel they'd need?
/r/MensRights17/04/18 08:26 AM
7

*Madison Breshears ETA - She's a woman. From the article: While my experience and those of women like me in ballet
/r/MensRights15/04/18 07:28 PM
2

You can either be the setpiece on someone elses theatrical life production, or you can be your own one man play. Mind if I steal this line?
/r/MensRights01/09/16 09:42 PM
1

At least he's changed up from "Chivalry is shit".
/r/MensRights22/08/16 07:38 PM
1

Try here.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 08:27 PM
1

Hello again! Having gone over your post again: at no point do you "clearly state[d] that this was in the late seventies" I did indeed read what you wrote; did you actually read my response? At no point did I say anything about my "worldview". Are you absolutely certain that you're not a feminist? Go through my post history and answer that for yourself (I know, that sounds like "educate yourself" but feel free to ask me for sources/evidence, etc. I'll dig up all the links [I've done work for AVfM…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:23 AM
1

And having been shown that it was a thing back in the day, in that particular country...I'm willing to go so far as the initial story is at least plausible. Pardon me for borrowing a term but, the way the OP is written..."triggered" me. I have seen so many false-flags and half-pandering in this sub I have an ingrained tendency to disbelieve. Especially when no one else asks questions.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:07 AM
3

Thank you for the info. I suppose I could have looked it up myself but I wasn't the one making claims. Have a great day!
/r/MensRights13/05/16 04:02 PM
-2

"My assessment of the situation", "Facts". One of these things is not like the other. Feel free to get back to me when you can link. I'll wait. I'll also call BS on can't link because "I'm on my phone", although I'll almost let "at work" go; except that here you are, responding.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 09:22 AM
-2

Lovely, straight up DARVO. Having looked into your post history, I assume that "here and then" refers to Sweden? edit: well documented fact that salary discrimination was in effect here and then. Care to show me?
/r/MensRights13/05/16 09:08 AM
5

She was one of the first female engineers graduated from her college but she struggled against the system. Even after 17 years as an engineer she still earned less than newly hired male engineers, even those with the same background as she. This whole thing sounds like BS. "the system"...Patriarchy? "Earned less": words have meaning; either she earned less for the same reasons that debunk the wage gap or you mean "was paid less", in which case (given the the apparent time frame) it was illegal (…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 08:37 AM
1

I'm fairly socially liberal: don't much care who you fuck or who you marry, abortion is ok (within limits), creationism is a joke (but if it gets you through the day, believe what you like; just don't try to push it on me or mine). I have some issues with the more radical side of the liberal view but in general I'm a live and let live type. My conservatism is focused more on the economic side (generally). I have been known to use the term Libertarian but I'm not completely anti-state.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:38 AM
2

And it’s easy to see why Facebook started a viral trend this week, asking women around the world to share “five reasons why I’m happy to be a mother.” #silentvom Nothing for the awesome dads. Nope. Because they’re probably all scratching their balls and watching the football, right? Wrong. They’re scratching their balls and watching the Teletubbies. All hail. Teared up for a second there.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 05:00 PM
1

Count me as a conservative MRA.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 04:39 PM
2

Here Here
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:36 PM
84

"Student servive fees"... For the love of little green apples, get a proofreader.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 03:08 AM
1

To whom/where did you send the email?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:16 PM
11

After getting consent and signing the forms in triplicate though...
/r/MensRights22/09/15 09:22 AM
1

Well it is hatred of mankind, but where man is used generically. It likely hasn't been altered by descriptivism because the next (technically) best word would be homothropy; and we can all see where that would lead. Ah, Latin; oh, Greek...hmmm.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 09:30 PM
1

That'd probably be a better slogan.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 09:08 PM
3

Last I checked it was misanthropy.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 07:55 PM
1

Where are the female suicide bombers? Here
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:14 PM
12

Ann Leckie’s debut novel Ancillary Justice, whose protagonists do not see gender. Leckie conveys this by using female pronouns throughout. Um, how does that work? Oh, wait...it's easier than acknowledging that male pronouns are considered gender-neutral and easier than writing in a manner that uses no pronouns (or neutral ones) without appearing contrived.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:48 PM
2

Yeah, but at least it's a different account. itssomething.jpeg
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:15 PM
11

And it's about equality anymore. I think you may have accidentally a word...
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:38 PM
2

I'm just here to say that I love your flair.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 03:56 AM
9

"Vaginas aren’t a trap card you can activate to bypass retaliation from hitting guys, just like penises aren’t a cheat code to enable woman-beating mode." Beautiful.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:53 PM
1

linking many times in different articles to a, literally, different subreddit and saying it's /r/mensrights[2] . Got any examples? Always good to have them handy when "debating" feminists..
/r/MensRights14/05/15 12:03 AM
1

It might be; I'll go through it. Sentience is the ability to feel, perceive, or experience subjectively. I have a feeling that you and I differ on the definition of sentient. If the ability to feel is all that is required then anything with a nervous system is sentient.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 07:30 AM
1

my take on the SW droids is that yes they are sentient, If you accept the expanded universe then according to Tales from the Bountyhunters they are not. The story of IG-88 makes this clear.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 07:23 AM
0

Citation needed. Edit - To be clear, I was asking about sentience, not rights/protections.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:28 PM
1

"People with a disability generally want to be represented by people with the same lived experience that they have." So being a woman is a disability now?
/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:35 PM
1

Who hires a lawyer by the name of Shady?
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:31 AM
15

Sounds like it was written by Jessica Valenti.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:21 AM
7

There's Voat for one.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 05:52 PM
2

Honestly couldn't think of a better flair.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:49 AM
1

That's why you send married couples.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 08:03 PM
4

"Almost threw him across the room" Sure. Oh and you have privilege because I say so. Delusional at best.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 07:41 PM
3

It was all in the thread attached to the TRP content sticky.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:48 AM
-3

men's dating coach Could you define that for me? After the TRP drama here in the last few days... Screenshots would be nice too.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:23 AM
13

I'm betting that everyone involved missed the joke.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:14 AM
2

Additional confirmation; also male ergo worst thing ever!
/r/MensRights15/03/15 10:00 PM
7

This situation reminded me of complaints feminists have of male-dominated work environments. I can’t help wondering if the scenarios are similar – are women just refusing to adapt to masculine environments and try to change them under the banner of misogyny? Well yeah.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 11:35 PM
2

Only idiots Exactly.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:34 AM
1

Nick Fury said something to original Thor that caused him to lose his worthiness What exactly happened?
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:37 PM
2

Horse Alien guy Beta Ray Bill. cool character.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:14 PM
1

Note the repeated misuse of "force". OP says "push". RF has rape on the brain. Employment-Rape!
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:35 AM
0

care to explain what I've missed?
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:37 AM
-8

What the fuck dude? Not cool.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 01:22 AM
1

Neat; thank you. That should keep me occupied for some little while.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 12:01 AM
1

the ability with the largest gender gap that has been found Cool, got a link?
/r/MensRights15/01/15 12:38 AM
5

forearm shiver Sorry, a what?
/r/MensRights11/01/15 04:28 AM
3

Servers shouldn't keep any more than half their tips, and tip totals and share-schemes should be open to scrutiny by even the lowest dishwasher. I don't care if I have to pay taxes on my tips (apparently most kitchen staff don't), I just want to know the mechanisms and calculations and that I'm not getting screwed. Hear, hear. I'm kitchen staff (sous) myself and while our system is better than most...our servers (much as I love 'em for what little work they do) shouldn't be making 3X what I do i…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 10:02 PM
19

I can't wait; this is going to be (or cause) a riot.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 09:58 PM
2

“domestic violence,” “sexual harassment,” “bullying,” and again, “child abuse” – none of which has any fixed definition. Indeed, the absence of definitions for all these alleged “crimes” blurs the distinction between legal and illegal behavior, so that the law can be tailored to fit the accusation, making it impossible for citizens (or juries) to know if they have committed a crime and facilitating the desired punishment. I don't think I've ever seen it put better.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:15 AM
2

As mentioned in the article, there is no charge of "Rape" under Canadian law. This allows anyone who looks at the data to use a single emotionally charged word to represent a multitude of offenses. The poll also declares, arbitrarily, that those who chose not to answer were probably "raped"...thus inflating the numbers (admittedly on both sides). I'd really like to know what the questions were, how rape was defined, who defined it, and (some help from a statistician would be welcome) whether or …
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:05 PM
1

Like this?
/r/MensRights18/12/14 11:21 PM
3

The average man is smaller than the average woman. Um...did you get this backwards or am I missing something?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 12:10 AM
1

Got some links for us? I'm too tired to do it myself. Thanks in advance.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 08:33 AM
3

Am I the only one that website doesn't work for? Disabled everything, still nothing.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 07:14 AM
1

Now, now, can't imply she's a prostitute...
/r/MensRights01/11/14 07:02 AM
1

GirlWritesWhat...aka Karen Straughn (I'm certain I misspelled that.)
/r/MensRights30/10/14 07:03 AM
0

IIRC women do tend to outperform men in long-distance running. Edit - Apparently I'm mistaken. Could have sworn there was one sport/physical activity they had an edge in.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 12:27 AM
2

Why ever not? Some 150lb. fool wants to challenge a 250lb. monster...go right ahead, I hope your premiums are paid up.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 12:26 AM
7

which is ostensibly about journalistic ethics but is in fact about trying to censure any discussion of gender politics in the gaming industry, (emphasis mine) Really? Says who? Oh wait...mainstream media.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 09:47 AM
1

Well, TIL. Thank you; with any luck it'll help. Bill Murray voice Baby steps...
/r/MensRights23/10/14 06:51 AM
8

Just checking... TwoX and /r/videos have both censored this post I'd check, but a: those who claim must provide evidence and b: I'm a bit drunk.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:36 AM
70

Thank you for posting that. I got half-ish way through and wanted to vomit; yeah..."she" goes to a foreign country, pays for everything, then goes home and proclaims victim status. Fuck me, I'm so sick of that shit. OT-Is there a sub dedicated to those of us who need help? My wife is "broken" and has a substantial support system in place (ooh, alliteration...an always...ah shit, I ran out), whereas I have only whiskey, beer, and my local pub regulars (read as barflies). Shit, I don't know anymor…
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:32 AM
12

I must have missed something. "Little girls dropping f-bombs" video? Right, just checked it out. Holy shit; yes, let us indoctrinate yet another generation of females into "men are the problem" with BS statistics and hysteria whilst simultaneously shaming and denigrating males one or two generations ahead. Sweet Jebus, I come closer every day to ending it all and leaving the world to rot.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:37 AM
1

Sure, it is entirely possible that this threat came from someone who meant it. It is equally possible that this threat was manufactured for the purposes of propaganda. We have no evidence either way but that doesn't preclude speculation. I haven't see anyone outright dismiss these threats, I've seen only people voicing the possibility that they may have been manufactured. Edit - Spelling
/r/MensRights15/10/14 09:47 PM
1

I've been looking for it myself, but can't seem to find it again.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 03:33 PM
2

His self-deprecating approach is exactly why. He sounds good, but if one reads further into his act...he spends as much time defending women (and their general [from a male perspective] insanity). IIRC there's a clip of him, after being told that MRAs were into his stuff in which he he backs right off. He's not specifically anti-feminist, just going back to old tropes about marriage, men, and women; therefore he sounds that way.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 10:20 AM
1

False Rape Accusation
/r/MensRights07/10/14 09:15 AM
2

I'm fairly certain that the 99% comes from "prevention of STDs" and becomes conflated with the 82%.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:22 AM
2

Crazy talk! Wimmin are just being OPPRESSED by the Patriarchy<sup>TM</sup> ... Do I have to add an /s?
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:21 AM
1

Only if one was to remove the "champion" (i.e. proxy violence) bit. Of course the challenged still has the right to choose weapons (which could make it very interesting in the modern world...).
/r/MensRights11/09/14 09:14 AM
4

They’re scared of you Gee...I wonder why that might be? Couldn't possibly be the double standards of Nice GuyTM / Creepy DouchebagTM , could it? Nah. Must be because we're terrified of women who are capable of holding their own in a conversation (Gods know all we want is vacuous airheads whose only value lies in how well they perform the horizontal mambo...).
/r/MensRights11/09/14 09:00 AM
2

Well she does seem to have gotten one part right: We’re dealing with a new breed of men here and it’s not the kind we grew up dreaming about. It’s the want-what-I-want-but-don’t-know-how-to-get-it type; it’s the sweet and cuddly mama’s boys*... Welcome to a generation and change of men brought up by single mothers (many of whom who were convinced that "they didn't need no man"...). Something something reap what ye have sown... ETA - What the hell is she on about with this?: Yet again, women are …
/r/MensRights11/09/14 08:49 AM
2

I'm not certain if I'd call Jenna a feminist...I'm also not certain that she would.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 07:50 AM
6

You (and /u/Meistermalkav) also missed: *havce (have) *galantry (gallantry) *top (to) *then (than) X2 *beautifull (beautiful) *like advertised (as advertised) *alexander (Alexander) *nixcon (Nixon [although the misspelling works in a satirical way]) *black panther (Black Panther) *If (if) *wonderfull (wonderful) Not to mention the commas spread liberally throughout the post. But yes, spot on. I also rather enjoyed chlamydia dripping stripper reject Pardon my pedantry.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 07:46 AM
5

Is the patriarchy something the mens rights movement is against? I don't personally see The Patriarchy<sup>TM</sup> as something to be against, by virtue of the fact that it doesn't exist. I would say that it is a toxic mindset that needs to be combated; not an actual political/social structure.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:49 AM
7

It's not just different; it's completely opposite. Your second point stands. Double standards, victim mentality, and SJW art projects are still BS. Cheers!
/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:47 AM
1

petty douchebags like you that give this reddit a bad reputation Wow...projection much? Go back to the Manhood Academy or whichever other rock you crawled out from under.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 02:18 AM
1

Fuck me, 101 shootings afterwards...wow. On a somewhat related note: What the hell is up with all the "Unknown" shooters?
/r/MensRights05/09/14 02:10 AM
2

Excellent point. I'll use that in my next conversation with a feminist. Thanks!
/r/MensRights05/09/14 02:06 AM
2

No, no; that's "Chivalry" you're thinking of. cue /u/dulcineaisawhore to tell us that "Chivalry is shit"
/r/MensRights05/09/14 02:05 AM
6

From your description" She tells him to stop, he does. From your source: .Tom was one of Sara’s closest friends. Their friends were all friends. They spent a lot of time together. They weren’t in a relationship, but had consensual sex twice. One night at the end of August, Sara and Tom, both juniors at Columbia, were at a party. Tom was drunk; Sara was not. Tom is tall; Sara is slight. She had nearly fainted earlier that day from dehydration and wanted to take it easy. At the end of the night, t…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 10:34 PM
3

Looking for this?
/r/MensRights04/09/14 10:14 PM
6

Where do I sign up? I'll pay dues just to ensure others may enjoy the club.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 10:12 PM
1

Your layout sucks; couldn't finish. Told I couldn't select more than one answer, not directed to where this occurred (shouldn't have been able to do it in the first place.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 10:15 AM
2

Another option – frequently floated in the mainstream media – is that feminism needs to “rebrand” to present itself as more docile and less alienating to men. Does this sound familiar to anyone else? Reminds me of the assertions sometimes made that men need to be more like women so as to not appear as threatening... But surely the onus should be on men to engage with feminism, rather than on feminism to be appear less threatening. Hmm, I wonder how that would go over (after being flipped) with t…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:04 AM
0

OT: Found something interesting... Recently took a trip into the Interior (British Columbia) with the wife (/u/LadyOlduvai [1] ) and a friend of ours, the details of which are inconsequential. On the way home we stopped at a lovely little smokehouse/bbq place; interesting drinks menu with something that caught my eye: The Honey Badger 3oz (served always as a double) Jack Daniels 1Tbsp Honey Big splash of Sour Lemon Mix Top with Apple Cider Orange slice Decidedly delicious, remarkably refreshing,…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 09:24 PM
1

Right-o. Will do. Sorry about that.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 09:22 PM
1

Ah, but if they charge him as an adult, then he's no longer a minor and it's not kiddie porn anymore.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:21 AM
2

it's just most of us in TRP have been burned already. Could you expand on that for me? I understand that TRP isn't all about sexual game, but it always struck me as playing by the rules (or using those rules to ones advantage). You got your life together (excellent!), lost 70 lbs. (also excellent); did you do these things for yourself (and nothing but) or did you do them to make the game easier to play? Got a 25% raise. Bought a house. I assume these two go hand in hand. Well done (most sincerel…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 08:37 AM
2

Well then, what flavour of Doritos would you favour?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:41 AM
3

I was asking for your personal experience. The sidebar won't help me much in that regard. Let me put it this way: What would you say are the goals and aims of Redpilling and how do these relate to what you perceive as the goals of MRActivism? It seems to me that you believe (as per your earlier post [gets results]) that they are either one and the same or very similar. I submit to you that my personal self-improvement came not from "Game" or anything I've seen advocated in TRP, but from the awak…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:40 AM
1

AVFM was and has always been a purposely drawn line in the sand that is entirely conscious about its "tone". I'd say it is one of the main editorial considerations it has, to walk up to that line and make sure no Feminist ever re-draws it yet again. Hear, hear. I know there are those in this sub and elsewhere who object to AVfM being the "front-line" or "voice" of the MRM, but without them this movement would still be shouting into the void. Love 'em, hate 'em, or otherwise: they have brought at…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:59 AM
1

I volunteer to send her a full side of double smoked bacon!
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:32 AM
7

Self-improvement in what way?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:29 AM
3

Pepsi's cut with too much sugar...
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:28 AM
2

Depends on the outfit I'm wearing, but...yes.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:57 AM
5

What exactly are those results?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:54 AM
3

Yes, chicken wings. Besides, who needs Red Bull when you've got coke?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:41 AM
1

Might I ask how you came to that conclusion?
/r/MensRights17/06/14 01:46 AM
1

Probably, but that just sort of proves our point doesn't it.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 07:16 PM
1

I think she'd make an interesting contrast to the other two.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:29 PM
2

Should be, donors ($50 and up, I believe) to the fundraiser were to receive a DVD of the proceedings. I'd hazard a guess that it'd be a Brule production.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:25 AM
1

Jessica Valenti, Amanda Marcotte, and Laci Green.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:17 AM
3

"What a lovely chair," I said to the shop's proprietor. "Thanks," he replied, "have you two ever made out with each other?" As we hastily tried to leave, he continued: "Perhaps tonight you'll start scissoring each other? Oh, come on, I'm only joking!" /r/thatHappened
/r/MensRights13/06/14 07:13 AM
1

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Vasalgel (or an equivalent) is both legal and available in India, yes?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:51 AM
2

Rad Dad Magazine believes patriarchal violence in society is epidemic and takes place in a vast culture of misogyny, male entitlement and male privilege. [emphasis mine] Here come the "feels" again. That aside, not all of their points are bad: Believe in other men's ability to parent. Talk to other men about fathering. This almost a no-brainer (you can't very well talk to a mom about fathering and expect true understanding, now can you?) Play pretend. Well yeah; play with your kids, encourage im…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:21 AM
5

It is indeed; the actual requirement however, is 30 push-ups.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:49 AM
3

Aye. (can we please borrow a screenshot bot from another sub?)
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:30 AM
2

They do actually. One takes the blue pill and continues to live in a false reality where they are controlled and manipulated by those in power...or one takes the red pill and awakens to see the underlying truth of reality, that they have been told lies, kept in the dark, and socially adjusted to not question the status quo.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:29 AM
2

On it!
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:53 AM
2

Soft kitty...
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:53 AM
2

Double space between paragraphs Like that.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:16 AM
1

Really? Got a link to that for me?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:40 PM
1

It is.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:12 AM
1

Fair enough. Have a great day!
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:24 AM
1

Marc Lepine also only killed 14, not 17 (10 women and 4 men). Thomas Ball "firebombed" a courthouse in the sense that he immolated himself on it's front steps. But hey, facts? Nah, don't need 'em.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:49 AM
2

Yeah, but that ankle of yours... May the Spirits of Emperors Past embrace you, Lieutenant Colonel.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:35 AM
1

We really do need to borrow the screen-shot bot from /r/sjsucks.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:25 AM
1

A well tailored shirt is often the best thing you can do to relieve the discomfort (I assume that's the reason you don't like to wear ties). In order for a tie to look good, IMHO, the top button on the shirt must be done up; if your shirt fits poorly (which most do) then it's very likely that closing the top button is difficult and/or uncomfortable. A good tailor can fix that. I like ties. Gives me an excuse to wear my tie-clips...
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:23 AM
1

I'd suggest that your comment is the sort of thing that belongs in a PM, not out here in the comments.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:47 PM
1

It seems you may have a point...
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:43 PM
1

Good job for the most part; it's "thespians" though.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:34 PM
3

I too would enjoy a link to the hissy-fit. It's brighten up my day considerably.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:32 PM
2

OT - Know how I know you're a Tosevite? Because the only Regeyas who came with the conquest fleet are dead. Should I just assume you have an alt that goes by Margyees?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:31 PM
1

If you have an account you can flag it as inappropriate (it breaks the terms of the TOS by virtue of the fact that it is slanderous and contains defamatory [not to mention completely untrue] statements). If you need to make an account but don't live in the states use the zipcode 77096 (Houston, Texas) as suggested in Dean Esmay's recent article at AVfM.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:26 PM
2

You'd probably have to have watched his youtube videos. I believe they've mostly been taken down however.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:20 PM
0

Didn't say it never happened, only that /u/stopsayingfaggot failed to provide a case which resulted in death. Nice try though.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:27 AM
2

Oh of course! How could I have forgotten?! Must go check my privilege...
/r/MensRights24/05/14 02:28 AM
1

A little, yes. Most especially since the article focuses so heavily on him.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 09:27 PM
0

Strange, none of these women were denied medication, isolated, and/or died from these abuses.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 09:06 PM
20

From the comments section: Emily: What a coincidence that page A-4 of TODAY'S hard copy (03 May) Oregonian contains both THIS story of Denise and Adam Keesee's actual abuse of her 15 year old student and her 30 day sentence/probation ... AND.... Helen Jung's Oregonian report on the LIFE SENTENCE of a Sherwood MAN for his attempted abuse of a 13 year old girl. Interesting, no?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:57 PM
3

There is. Little b/w picture halfway down the article or so.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:55 PM
1

I'd have to say my favourite bit actually comes from the comments: Determinate word meanings are an obstacle to abusing people for their privilege in using insensitive language. Too perfect!
/r/MensRights23/05/14 03:18 AM
1

Yep, see the comment by Ucanthandledatruth for the link.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 12:44 AM
1

Wow, I got a 27. Neat-o.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 02:31 AM
1

The first one is a percentage of the users posts in a sub, the second is how many posts they have in the sub.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:24 AM
3

As I understand it: Shadowbanning a bot causes it to continue on it's little crusade because it believes it's getting feedback. An outright ban results in a new account and continued spamming.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:15 AM
2

Check out /r/sjsucks, I do believe they already have such a bot.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 11:19 PM
1

Fair enough. I have a tendency to try to see the posts here as would a newbie/casual visitor or someone looking to mis-quote us. That's why the title irked me. Agreed on the support. Have a great day!
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:58 PM
1

My comment is correct. The article itself does not contain this information. Perhaps OP should have linked this actual complaint then.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:33 PM
-12

Nowhere in this article does it state that he lost his license. There is also no mention of the cops not viewing his video. tl;dr: most of title is bullshit. We can do better than this.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:31 AM
1

If they had rented the whole restaurant why did she have to/choose to use the men's?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:30 AM
1

That only applies in /r/feminism and only applies to "top-level comments" (i.e. - you may not start a comment thread unless it is from a feminist point of view). One can reply to any comment (without being required to be from a "feminist perspective"), for all the good it'll do you. I managed to get myself banned in less than 10 minutes (without being a dick about it).
/r/MensRights20/01/14 07:57 PM
1

There's a comic about the strippers, Hitler, and Stalin...I'm sure you can see the potential problems. Here are a number of examples. Heil!
/r/MensRights20/12/13 10:21 PM
1

I think you're reading a little much into it. It neither means, nor even implies, anything of the sort. BTW it would be "whomever" as it's indirect.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 10:22 PM
5

Welcome! Stick around and feel free to offer opinions, criticisms, and content; just be aware that the conversations here can be become just as fractious (if not more so) than the ones generally found in other "gendered" (for lack of a better term) subreddits. Be prepared to be challenged and asked to back up your statements. Hopefully you'll find this sub both thought-provoking and intellectually stimulating!
/r/MensRights18/12/13 06:07 AM
2

Screenshot updated from my previous one posted elsewhere.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:20 PM
2

I try. We really do need a screenshot rule. Or a bot that does it before the submission goes up. After all, no linky...no clicky...no ad revenue.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:16 PM
3

May I suggest that you reformat your submission? Use your comment as the base of a self post and include the image macro inside it. Possibly a np link to the original as well. This is likely to be removed.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:11 AM
3

Goofy dog face thing with short captions spread out all over the place. Doge.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:44 AM
8

Screenshot.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:36 AM
3

We tell everyone to hit no one, unless it's in self-defence.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:33 AM
1

See here for the video.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:02 AM
5

Shit Reddit Says. A group of people who get together, link "offensive" comments and submissions, and mock them or "deconstruct" them so as to find racism, sexism, misogyny, ageism, ableism, blah blah blah. Think the sorts who are featured in /r/TumblrInAction, but operating here. They claim to be a circle-jerk but are often accused of brigading comment threads that they deem "_____-ist".
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:57 AM
2

What gives you the idea that anyone here thinks DV is okay?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:50 AM
2

What's confrontational about his post?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:48 AM
5

Does being banned from SRS count? Or is that too easy? It's my only ban to date so I'd like to know if it's actually "worth" anything. edit - just been banned from /r/feminism too. Do I get a trophy now?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:47 AM
0

Hear hear. Once again you have written my thoughts on the subject in a manner I believe I would have been hard-pressed to. Well said. I grew up in an age where sex and gender meant the same thing and in my head they still are; in my speech and writing I use them as separate terms because that's the way things are now.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 05:53 AM
4

Meh, it's alternet; what else did you expect?
/r/MensRights15/12/13 03:35 AM
1

I'm curious as to where you got those statistics. Source?
/r/MensRights15/12/13 01:15 AM
2

You mean like this?
/r/MensRights12/12/13 05:51 PM
3

The article says nothing about her not consenting to the additional acts. It states only that she had consensual sex with one of the boys and that the other two performed acts, short of sex, with her. One could interpret the lack of a statement concerning consent as meaning there was no consent but the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 05:30 PM
2

It's serious to me (as I've indicated, I'm a pedant) up to a point. I also find both the action of making the distinction and the occasionally belligerent or equally pedantic responses to be enjoyable. So you are free to see it as me being serious (true, for the most part) or as me having a laugh (also true) and attempting to provide one for others. Everyone wins! Equality!
/r/MensRights12/12/13 04:28 PM
6

From the site: *Please note: Not all the items in the kit are able to be legally sold in all countries and may require permits. Please check with your local law in regards to whether you can carry or own these items prior to ordering. Some items in kit are made to order so delivery times can vary, we will email you approximate delivery times. Nice piece of CYA.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 08:36 AM
3

I don't get it either but there it is. If you were to ask the officials involved I suspect you'd receive something similar to the following: "Something something, sex is...erm...well not...right at that age, something something, community standards, victimized that girl, blah blah blah"
/r/MensRights12/12/13 08:32 AM
2

Futile, possibly; making the distinction, fun for me! I get you aren't angry, my apologies if it seemed that I was under that impression. edited for pedantry.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 08:29 AM
2

So long as they get page views and ad revenue, there really isn't any reason for them to do so.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 08:25 AM
2

Late to the party but, for those who have no wish to give slate page views: The Full Article
/r/MensRights12/12/13 08:13 AM
2

As I mentioned to someone else here: "Just having some fun, mate." Consider it a tl;dr of the Wiki articles on the subjects if you insist on taking it seriously. I'm a pedant and enjoy it. Have a great day!
/r/MensRights12/12/13 07:57 AM
5

The acts took place on the grounds of a BOY'S school the students of that school have been punished Negative. The boys attended Cranbrook school, the acts took place on the grounds of Bronte Public school. The school the girl attends is not mentioned. The boys were punished because (FTA): “As a boys' school, Cranbrook has a particular duty to encourage and enable its students to behave with courtesy and respect, particularly towards girls in their peer group." Which is, IMO, a BS reasoning. The …
/r/MensRights12/12/13 07:23 AM
2

Just having some fun, mate. To be completely technical about it: all Trilbys are Fedoras, but not all Fedoras are Trilbys. Yes, I'm a pedant. Have a great day!
/r/MensRights12/12/13 06:54 AM
1

Could you post said letter here when you're done? It may make a useful template for others.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 04:49 AM
10

For those wondering about the difference: Trilby vs. Fedora. Note the differences in the brim and crown. You're welcome! (reddit needs a bot for this...or maybe not)
/r/MensRights12/12/13 03:05 AM
3

Thanks! I missed that post somehow.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:38 AM
3

Got a link for that? I'd love to read it.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 05:51 AM
1

They warned about the increasingly violent nature of modern pornography and its effects on young users, which Ms. Dines described in an interview as a “public health emergency situation,” which she says is proved by empirical research and academic studies. I'd love to see these studies. I have the odd feeling they're about as credible as a letter sent from a 10yr old boy claiming to be addicted to porn.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 04:47 AM
2

This "test" is complete drivel. Good catch on this one OP. This is precisely the sort of BS propaganda that makes all men look bad. I just love how they conflate so many different things into one category to make their "point".
/r/MensRights11/12/13 02:47 AM
3

madame Borg That gave me a giggle. All I can see in my head is the Borg queen with a caption reading: The FemHive has come for you...
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:24 AM
0

We seem to have wandered away from my initial point and into some odd territory of "prove this claim/statement". Most of the discussion going on ITT is relevant to the issue of disproportionate impact, which is good. Sparking a discussion on the relative impact of ZT policies is a good thing and necessary. Doing so via the posting of an irrelevant episode is, IMHO, the equivalent of the Women Doing Bad Things posts in this sub (which do have their place but can, to the uninitiated, appear as not…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:18 AM
3

Well, I have to say that I'm glad I haven't paid a cent for any of his works. I had no idea he was so blind.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:53 AM
-1

All right, one more time. ZT policies do disproportionately impact (to use your phrasing) boys. That is a MR issue. I have never denied this. This particular case has nothing to do with the fact that the victim of said policies is a boy. No one, regardless of gender, is allowed their drugs under this policy. Therefore this piece of news isn't relevant specifically. It sparked discussion, which is a good thing, but, for the last time, this particular news item isn't directly a result of ZT polici…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:46 AM
0

At no point have I challenged or denied that zero tolerance policies are used more often against men and boys. I have at no point tried to make it not a men's rights issue. This particular case has no relevance to the fact that ZT policies are unfairly applied. You can start by factually and rationally demonstrating that overt, measurable and direct discrimination is the only issue of adversity faced by men and boys in today's society. I have never made such a statement. Your attempt to frame me…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:26 AM
-1

Again: this particular story shows no discrimination, no one-sided arguments, nothing. While Zero-tolerance policies do tend to work against boys more often than not, this story doesn't contain any element of this. Had the post been about the prevalence of ZT policies acting against the good of boys (for example: had it been included in a series of links) I wouldn't be asking "What does this story have to do with MR?". A single case which happens to be about a boy dying due to the BS policies su…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:07 AM
1

She was let off because of the "trauma" of having gone through various trials and questionings, not because of unfounded domestic violence allegations. Still a good point.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:21 AM
3

Put me on it then. Hell, I'll start the damn thing if I have to. It could become a useful resource for those of us looking for others of a like mind.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:17 AM
1

As another Canadian...I agree. Fuck them.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:15 AM
1

Zero tolerance policies are a men's rights issue. They may well be but this particular one isn't. It doesn't discriminate in any way. While this is a note-worthy item, it isn't specifically MR.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:09 AM
1

You say that as though you're surprised. Stick around; you'll see some of the most bat-shit insane things. Welcome!
/r/MensRights09/12/13 12:38 PM
3

Hmm. I must admit then that I've got nothing. Given that there doesn't appear to be a consensus, I let it go. I was providing sources and seem to have produced a dead-end. Good call on asking. We should always be careful with these sorts of things. Thank you.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:59 AM
2

It would appear then that we need a meta-study. I freely admit that I haven't gone through them, merely provided a link to potential sources. If you've gone through them...which side appears to predominate?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:08 AM
7

Here you go. I'm sure there are more out there now and more to come. I can update you as I find them if you like.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 02:49 AM
1

He's referring to the female variant, but your point is somewhat valid. If nothing else, it would level the playing field.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 02:44 AM
2

To the best of my knowledge the author of a piece doesn't write the headline. That is an editors job.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 02:42 AM
3

Read that again. It works to fix that problem. The one it opens up is of a father who wants a child but isn't told in time. If that is what you meant, you may wish to re-word your comment, as it isn't clear (at least to me upon first read).
/r/MensRights09/12/13 02:41 AM
4

Have at look here. Pick any one of them.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 02:36 AM
2

I think we had one...I'll go look. Found it. You could always start another though. Insanity is an excellent word choice BTW.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 02:03 AM
1

Also, I notice some women complaining that since she quit her job, he should be entitled to compensation. You may have missed an "s" in there.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 03:39 AM
1

No, he's not kidding. See here and here. As to cohabitation plummeting...we'll see soon enough.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 03:37 AM
3

give food only to men You may want to fix that.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 01:34 AM
2

Police later gave a statement which amounted to "because they're women".
/r/MensRights05/12/13 06:58 AM
1

It could be that they're downvoting you because it's your blog. Some don't like that and see it as blog-spam. Having seen the apparent number of trolls and/or feminists popping up in this sub lately...I'd wager that Demonspawn is correct.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 06:24 AM
1

There is apparently a Unicode for a reversed question mark (U+2E2E) which was considered at one point to be a mark used to denote that the preceding was rhetorical, which could be adapted for use. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be supported. I personally support the use of an interrobang instead... ‽
/r/MensRights05/12/13 12:15 AM
3

I dismiss most males as well based on my observations of their actions. I dismiss/ignore most of the women for the same reasons. I have neither the wish or the energy to be bothered with them.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 10:27 PM
1

sarc mark You mean this one? As much of a fan of the /s as I am, I'd still really like to see a proper piece of punctuation put in purposefully.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 09:42 PM
1

I do believe that what j5c077 is referring to is the trope of feminists not shaving (read as including trimming) at all, leading to an image of pubes that merge with upper leg hair and it becomes a jungle rather than a garden. I could dig up some visual aides but I think you get the idea.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 09:12 PM
2

I wear one on occasion. Generally when the cowboy hat I wear the rest of the time doesn't go with my outfit (read as with a suit). I appear to be one of the few who seems capable of wearing one without looking like a complete fool (most likely because I'm rather older [read as my face has finished filling out] than most of guys trying it nowadays). That said...most of the stereotypical atheist neckbeards around here who are wearing a "fedora" are actually wearing a Trilby.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 09:06 PM
3

treating women as you’d ideally like to be treated as a man Whenever I do that I'm called a misogynist. Women demand special treatment from me all the time, above and beyond what I give to other men and what expect given to myself. The starkest example of this can be found in violent altercations; If I hit a man in the face, I expect and accept that he will likely hit me back. The same is not true for a woman. When a woman hits a man in the face, she expects no retaliation. Indeed, she will rout…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 08:56 PM
1

Did anyone else get a malware warning?
/r/MensRights01/12/13 04:32 AM
0

Another set of excellent points. So really, the only one they got even close to the truth is population.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 02:59 PM
0

Good point. Didn't even consider that.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 02:56 PM
3

Request function does not work. Not to mention the typos: "promiser" and "witch". Well done. /s
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:34 AM
3

That wouldn't surprise me in the least. It's all pretty much BS.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:32 AM
8

And 1% of the world's money? It's one% of the the world's property. Still BS though. I can see the 10% income as possibly being close to the truth; The highest paying jobs are typically CEOs and such, which are typically held by males. The population one is roughly correct (actually a little under, I think). The working hours? Not likely.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 05:59 AM
1

Try this one or this one.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 04:52 AM
1

Well done. You managed to concentrate many of my own frustrations in a way that I'm not certain I ever could have. May I borrow your comment for use a copypasta in the future?
/r/MensRights27/11/13 04:44 AM
1

So what's it like being very wealthy, successful and good looking in an Australian university?
/r/MensRights26/11/13 01:56 AM
2

Absolutely. This sub is a little weird sometimes about it though. A couple days ago I was heavily down-voted for asking whether a comment was sarcastic (and then again for pointing out that sarcasm isn't always obvious) because it's not always obvious, especially with the number of trolls around here. Ah well, such is life on the net I guess.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 01:12 AM
1

What's the "Hayden rider"? Edit - Never mind, went through the rest of the comments and found out. Yikes.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 10:42 PM
2

And this is why reddit as a community and this sub most especially need to use sarcasm tags more often.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 09:33 PM
-1

Good point, it may just have been how I read it. Still, presentation is everything.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 09:06 AM
15

Finally, an issue that feminists and misogynists alike could agree on: I love how the opposite of feminist is supposedly misogynist.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 08:45 AM
1

Your source for that?
/r/MensRights25/11/13 07:58 AM
3

Good question. Perhaps we should ask one of our UK-based frequenters to check.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 07:12 AM
2

Reddit can be a truly amazing place, for all sorts of different reasons...
/r/MensRights25/11/13 06:16 AM
1

George Olduvai, along with Vandervecken and C. Cretemaster are all aliases of Jack Brennan (first Earth human to survive the process of becoming a 3rd stage [Protector] human).
/r/MensRights25/11/13 05:51 AM
1

I try. Multiple layers too. Most people initially make a connection with Olduvai gorge, which is correct but not for the reasons they believe. A few make the secondary connection to Larry Niven's book Protector. It also happened to work out well when I briefly joined the editorial staff at AVfM (Paul, John, and then George...)
/r/MensRights25/11/13 05:16 AM
1

Right-o. Have a great night!
/r/MensRights25/11/13 05:01 AM
2

I feel like I do enough. There we have it.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 04:58 AM
1

And I think the appropriate way to deal with Young's criticism would have been to acknowledge it and accept it as honest criticism coming from a true friend. Perhaps, but I can understand why Paul reacted the way he did. I think it's a matter of perspective. Cathy Young, Glenn Sacks, Barbara Kay, etc., have been there for years doing the hard work of patiently working with the public making way for when AVFM could succeed with a more forceful and angry message -- and it is still not clear that m…
/r/MensRights25/11/13 04:53 AM
-1

Well, having read your comment, I can only say that I agree with your stance for the most part.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 04:07 AM
1

You're "86" I'm guessing?
/r/MensRights25/11/13 03:25 AM
-8

Clearly he's joking. Then again, this is the internet Precisely why I felt the need to ask for clarification. While there are certain accepted marks (/s for example) which can be considered clarifiers not everyone uses them. In a sub such as this the original statement is exactly the sort of thing that can and will be quote mined to our detriment. It is also the sort of comment that, IMHO, outside of this sub is easily and commonly taken to be humour. Within this sub however it is something that…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 09:03 AM
-12

I can only hope that was sarcasm. Or that you live somewhere where those activities aren't illegal without written consent... I'm hoping for sarcasm.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 04:23 AM
1

We can only hope. Oh, yes, we also have to work at it, but this is a great first step. Now if UVic would open a centre I'd gladly volunteer some time.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 08:48 AM
1

One good thing about this post...I found /r/whiteknighting because of it. That shit is hilarious; an excellent antidote to the pain, suffering, and general misery that is the rest of my front page (minus the boobs and stuff, of course).
/r/MensRights23/11/13 05:43 AM
1

I seem to recall, from the numerous other times this app has appeared in a post to this sub, that there are in fact similar apps for guys. Perhaps they're simply not talked about for fear of the backlash?
/r/MensRights22/11/13 12:16 PM
30

Reminds me of the recent case in Canada in which a woman attempted to hire a hitman (twice, IIRC, winds up trying to hire an undercover RCMP officer) to kill her husband and is eventually let off because "she has already suffered enough". edit - This one.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:25 AM
3

He might have an easier time knowing what you meant if you replied directly to him. I'd like to second /u/Cant_Ban_All_MRAs thanks for being here; it's good to see more people noticing.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:23 AM
2

Bingo! We have a winner. Although I'm sure the good doctor would argue that foot-binding is only a cultural/aesthetic "enhancement" where MGM has "actual" "benefits".
/r/MensRights22/11/13 02:34 AM
11

In one of a series of blogs, which accompany this special issue, Journal of Medical Ethics editor, Professor Julian Savulescu, says that circumcision is one of the oldest forms of attempted human enhancement, and that it has benefits and risks, the magnitude of which are hotly contested. Bolding mine. Enhancement? Seriously?
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:43 AM
2

We really do need either a straight-up rule or general understanding that if one intends to submit a post about an article from say...Salon, Vice, HuffPo etc. one is expected to screen-cap the blasted thing rather than (as /u/vagued pointed out) driving their traffic.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:07 AM
60

You may want to re-think your title. You are implying that she had to pay $500 and go to AA for 18 months before she could be allowed to sexually assault the 12 yr old boy. That was her sentence, not the price of admission.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 06:30 PM
2

No problem. I feel this should be a standard thing in this sub. "Let OP give them one hit, that they might be screen-shotted for our consumption."
/r/MensRights20/11/13 02:12 AM
1

Yes, cheat is I suppose another way of looking at it (he did cheat by changing the rules after all). I never saw it as a moral tale; it was supposed to be a test of one's character, how one dealt with an un-winnable (and deadly) situation.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 06:27 PM
1

Yep. Like this: 1 and 2
/r/MensRights19/11/13 06:24 PM
3

The only way to win is to not play. No, no, that's War Games. In a Kobayashi Maru situation the only way to win is to change the rules.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 05:54 PM
22

Can we get a screenshot? I hate driving up their numbers. Edit - Screw it, I'll do it. 1, 2, and 3. I'll go back for the comments if anyone wants to see 'em. They don't look too bad actually.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 05:27 PM
1

Precisely this. I should have been a little more specific I suppose, so thanks IOIOOIIOIO!
/r/MensRights15/11/13 09:46 AM
2

Anyone else having an issue with the site? Every time the banner at the top reaches it's end it disappears briefly (which moves everything up) and when it starts again everything moves back down. I'm trying to read some of the articles and it's driving me nuts. That aside, I hope their goal is reached in time and wish I had something to donate. With any luck I'll find a twenty on the ground and can donate then.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 08:47 AM
2

Personally, I'd just go with it as is; do yourself one favour though: ask her for her opinion again and record it.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 08:28 AM
2

Terrible title OP. Just give us the articles title; don't add stuff afterwards. These men were initially charged with murder (which is bloody ridiculous, as the article points out). Frankly I'm not really impressed with the articles choice of title either. Still a good read.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 10:12 PM
1

Tell that to the women getting pap smears. Alternatively... It can begin a conversation.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 07:37 PM
1

And speculation about conversation. Shall we go around again?
/r/MensRights09/11/13 07:30 PM
2

It does tend to begin conversation; as it has here.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 07:23 PM
1

Fair enough, as it seems to have worked. Just thought I'd check.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 06:39 PM
2

Well I'm fucked then. Raised by a controlling, hypocritical (and hyper-critical) single mom, no access to my father for 20+ years (beginning at age 5), borderline alcoholic (which side of said borderline I'm on depends on whom you ask), smoker for 20+ years...yep, fucked. Hurrah! I need a drink.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 04:56 AM
1

inciteful. Did you mean "insightful"? "Inciteful would be "to incite" (as violence), as opposed to providing insight.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 04:27 AM
1

She appeared in at least on standard movie that I know of. Would You Rather (it's on Netflix); it was pretty good.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 08:38 PM
1

gets pelted with various nautical implements for bringing up De Caprio's defining line If you think that's his defining line, I'd suggest that you haven't seen What's Eating Gilbert Grape (or alternatively, Blood Diamond) ducks return fire I find myself in agreement with almost everything else you said (yes, semantics is fun! [you may also wish to note that bastardy is an equal-opportunity ducks again offender]). Should I go back and change my original statement to read Rad-FemsTM (perhaps just …
/r/MensRights06/11/13 02:45 PM
1

True enough. May I go out on a limb and assume (using reddit's general demographics) that you are American? It would seem to me (as an outsider [and given my previous assumption]) that unifying men on voting for issues of men's rights would be difficult given the "two-party" system, would it not? I agree that the unification of all men under a singular banner (that being one which promotes the issues we take issue with [sorry about that, I hadn't anything better]) would be superb; unfortunately,…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:54 PM
3

That's why I very deliberately left out the other half of your statement. We don't demand special privileges, but we do have a movement. My apologies if that wasn't clear (should I remove the ellipsis?).
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:31 PM
1

Good point. I should have been somewhat more specific. Gnarly problems often require that a group hang ten of their number in order to appease...ah shit, I ran out of '80s surfer lingo; you win. I could always make an appeal to the pedantic...I said radicals (indicating a group [nominative]) as opposed to using the term radical (adjectival)...nah, not worth it. You still win...you Aspie bastard. :)
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:21 PM
5

Oh, look...another one. To the rest of you: I know, I know...don't feed them etc. It's difficult not to sometimes. I'll stop now, I swear.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:16 PM
2

That's not a terrible idea. Given how unlikely most of our opponents are to actually research something, it may actually work. Huarrah for the reverse Tah-dah!
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:12 PM
9

Men don't have a similar movement... Allow me to cherry-pick for a moment and ask: isn't that why we're here? Not attempting to be confrontational, just saying...
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:09 PM
1

I don't suppose you could provide some citations to go along with your assertions?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:37 PM
14

I wasn't even surprised when I found this in my textbook. And isn't that sad? When we are no longer surprised, when we see such things and say to ourselves..."of course that's how it would be written"; isn't that the sign that something needs to be done? I am glad every day to know that this community (and the wider one of MHRA's everywhere) gives a damn and is doing something about it, no matter how small our individual contributions may be. Finagle's curse upon our detractors, Murphy's curse u…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 10:29 AM
14

You really don't get the point behind either this post nor the one you were "replying" to, do you? Nevermind folks...post history shows this one to be a troll. InB4 "don't feed the troll"...
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:30 AM
1

The very idea that a mother could do such things to her child... I just don't get it. That has been the problem for a long time. It's also why we post these articles.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 02:44 AM
1

Have I missed something? Why is this here? How is this a MR issue?
/r/MensRights19/10/13 03:25 AM
-1

You may want to work on that then. Humour is highly subjective and not often nor easily recognized in this sub. Enjoy the rain for the next few days.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:27 PM
1

Yes; one who listens to my problems without dismissing them/attempting to one-up, one who doesn't see me as a disposable resource, one with whom I can hold a conversation about our related interests, one who doesn't assume there's something wrong with me if I don't want sex, one who understands that I need time to myself/time with my friends...as PerfectHair says below "It's easier to list what I don't want in a partner". Oh wait, I have that one (aside from the fact she can't cook); give yourse…
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:33 PM
1

Absolutely. If you know you have something, anything, that can be transmitted, then you should inform your potential partner. Failure to do so, especially in cases of potential lethality (HIV) or permanent effect (herpes etc.), should be punished. Simply sticking to less likely transmission activities or using protection is unacceptable unless your partner knows the risk(s) they are taking. If you have a cold/flu/take your pick of non-lethal transmittable diseases, you tell others who may come i…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:46 AM
2

Yeah, in the time between my first comment and this one I have been looking around and turned up this additional info. Thank you nonetheless. I wish sometimes this sub would be a little more diligent about its research before going off. Ah well, back to the salt mines. Have a great day!
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:42 PM
1

That court picture is not the mother and father. It is the father and his new fiancee. See here
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:35 PM
1

Why, thank you kind sir!
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:08 PM
10

So tell me, is it really a brilliant idea for women to have to learn this lesson by competing directly with men - and being beaten over and over again with absolutely no chance of ever winning? Actually, I think it might be a good idea. Let them compete under the same restrictions and guidelines as men for a while. Then ask them if they still want to. I'd wager heavily that this sort of nonsense would stop rather quickly.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:58 PM
6

I'd wager it was the "Fucking grow the fuck up" bit. Possibly the all caps bits as well. I'm just guessing though.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:37 PM
1

The thumbnail shown when I click the link shows both parents. Has it been altered since being released?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:20 PM
0

Agreed. Do we need monocles and stuff or is that optional?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 12:25 AM
0

If only they thought that way about it...
/r/MensRights11/07/13 11:59 PM
18

Thank you! edit - In that case... Richard Elliott, the executive director of the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, which also intervened in the case, said the decision was not a good one for people living with HIV. His group's position is that either a low viral load or the use of a condom should be the required test to avoid being prosecuted, but not both, as the top court said in Friday's ruling. "We know from the science now that if either you use a condom or you have a low viral load, the ris…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:17 AM
7

Where did you get the "accused of rape" portion of your title?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:44 AM
2

Possibly because they contain actual boobs, not just nearly naked photos?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:38 AM
1

That's more or less what I was thinking; just couldn't clarify it for myself. Thank you!
/r/MensRights10/07/13 06:02 PM
1

MENtal Anxiety MENtal Breakdown MENstrual Cramps MENopause Did you ever notice how all our problems begin with MEN. HERpes... I know, I know, it's an old joke.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:09 AM
5

Most previous campaigns to fight sexual assault focused on prevention tips for women, Something like this (presumably)... the SAVE campaign was designed to focus its message on the perpetrators with print and transit advertisements including ads posted above urinals in bar washrooms. Because, as we all know (/s), the first one is shaming and the second attempt will totally change the minds of those intent on rape. /s
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:01 AM
2

From the comments: Cain Lawrence @Jazz Baby: "Also, I'm wondering whose face was used for this poster. I know I wouldn't want my face on it." It's plagiarized images from the original "Don't be that guy" campaign. If and when they find whoever is responsible for these current posters, the models will have every right to file lawsuits against them. Anybody know if this is true?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:34 AM
11

Done and done.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:28 AM
-3

I just don't think Men's rights puts nearly enough focus on actual rape prevention And what exactly do you suggest we do? Teach each other not to rape?
/r/MensRights09/07/13 10:47 AM
2

What is it about Michael Kimmel that discredits it for you? As an aside...the beard section I too found somewhat disquieting.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 09:41 AM
3

Done {1} and done {2}. Hopefully the links work for you. The 2nd (Netflix) link seems to have audio/video syncing issues (may just be me). Having provided links...is it just me (it may be because I'm slightly intoxicated) or does the Cosmo editor(?) seem like one of the more levelheaded ones?
/r/MensRights08/07/13 09:38 AM
6

being a sterile male is the same as consenting to fatherhood and two decades of financial responsibility. I think you mean "fertile" as opposed to "sterile".
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:16 AM
28

Who the hell even comes up with this kind of stuff? A woman so ensnared by stereotypes and tradition that she uses a pseudonym because she would rather her grandmother remain ignorant of her hearty sexual appetite. Note that the author shows zero sympathy or empathy towards the men in her life who tell her no; you know, those two things that women have (naturally) and men don't...
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:00 AM
5

Mythbusters is a terrible source. They choose what they want to "test" then set up their "test" in such a way that is pleasing/useful to a camera. They frequently ignore basic controls. Again, the show is set up to make the "test" look good; not to actually test any hypothesis.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 11:05 AM
3

ding ding ding We have a winner! Break gender stereotypes and learn something at the same time! Grow a window garden (for those who live in apartments); provide (ha-ha!) tasty meals for those under your wing! Semi-seriously though...nitric acid isn't all that difficult to make (and yes folks, it does make a fabulous fertilizer); has numerous other uses, just don't spill it on yourself (duh).
/r/MensRights18/06/13 10:01 AM
3

I would suggest HNO3 (nitric acid) instead. It "burns" in concentration but makes a lovely fertilizer at lower concentrations...
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:43 AM
2

I suggest that you wait for the results of the most recent demographic survey. The optional question at the end asks one to prioritize the major issues (assuming a reasonable [read as statistically significant] subset of us answered that one should give you a fairly solid read on what the #1 issue is). I will go looking for the link to the survey...give me a minute. edit - found it if anyone hasn't taken it, please do so.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:29 AM
2

I think you mean "I have ever read"?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 10:13 PM
1

any military which slaughters women I think you mean "offers up women for slaughter". Which is, quite frankly, just one more problem we (as a society) must come to terms with. Either they are equal in every way (which feminists proclaim to be truth [and therefore subject to the same dismissal/usefulness as males]) or they have greater intrinsic value (which some feminists also declare to be the truth [and therefore shouldn't have/be allowed to serve in any military]).
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:53 AM
1

Surprisingly, he has few options in the United States. Unsurprisingly...FTFT edit- “if women’s partial responsibility for pregnancy does not obligate them to support a fetus, then men’s partial responsibility for pregnancy does not obligate them to support a resulting child.” Woo-hoo! Someone is on our side!
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:37 AM
3

Note that the article reads: his partner and her children A step forward in justice (overall), a standard display of the dismissal of males (yay MSM! /s).
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:36 AM
1

Can anyone tell me what businessinsider.com has against my browser? I've tried disabling Ghostery, Adblock (and AdBlockPlus [different browser]), yet nothing seems to work.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 09:02 AM
3

Absolutely. Post away.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 03:01 AM
1

'Cause mowing the lawn is fun! Not at all a potentially dangerous undertaking...
/r/MensRights19/05/13 08:28 AM
1

Probably read an article written by Zach Rosenberg.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 05:57 AM
2

Wait...I missed one. Black-Latino/a handicapped transsexual lesbian Jew otherkin (which happens to be Muslim). I'm sure we can find at least one somewhere on Tumblr.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 05:26 AM
7

Better source.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:39 AM
2

The attack occurred in Florida. Better source than The Sun.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:39 AM
3

Black/Latino/a handicapped Transsexual lesbian Jew.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:31 AM
1

I hadn't when I commented, I usually check the comments first.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:38 PM
1

hearing Paul accuse him of murder Would you care to cite a source? Paul has said some things I don't entirely agree with but I don't recall anything like that. edit - don't mind me.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:33 AM
1

Give it a few; it will either even out or present you with an easily solvable issue. Shave every other day (the results of a study be damned) or let it go (and be "judged" as a "better potential parent"). Either way, do not let a study decide for you what to do with your facial hair. Rock it if you can, work it if you can't.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:27 AM
2

Wait one, your's doesn't itch until it becomes an actual beard? Must be nice; I've been aware of the findings (of this study) for some time. The "ten day stubble" is (for me) right when it becomes itchy (and begins to cause various skin issues [read as small patches of irritation]). My personal "non-scritchy" (as per my wife) stage is approximately 20 days; this is the point at which my facial hair reaches a length that is no longer "scritchy", it is instead "soft"ish enough to allow for ahem ev…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:20 AM
1

You say that as though it was a bad thing... I'm 36 and still get carded when I shave. I try to take it as a compliment; but when I want to ask the person behind the counter for their ID, it makes me rage.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 06:55 AM
6

As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women...he can sexually molest his daughters... THE VAST MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE WORLD DO ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE. -Marilyn French. Did she, at any point, provide a citation for this? Or is this just more of the usual (read as re-definition of any given word to mean whatever happens to fit the na…
/r/MensRights02/05/13 07:00 AM
0

I thought that understanding the joke would be a no-brainer. If understanding the joke was a no-brainer, then, oddly, you missed the point. "Bad taste"? Really? Satire, look it up. I know you're young but try to keep up.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:43 AM
1

My apologies then. I assumed there was a staff. Anywhere I can donate something to help?
/r/MensRights29/04/13 08:21 PM
0

Seems pretty good but the layout is horrible; unexpanded, it's too small to read comfortably, expanded, you have to scroll up and down to read the damn thing.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:29 AM
5

You've already had a number of positive responses but I feel the need to add mine. Very few people here give a rat's ass about your "gender" or whatever term you like. All are welcome, glad to have you here.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 09:48 AM
2

Give it an hour or so. Printers only work so fast you know.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:07 PM
1

True enough. It may just be a tiny little circle-jerk (circle-jill?).
/r/MensRights21/04/13 11:29 AM
2

Why am I not surprised? Is /r/Beating_Men also supposed to be a joke, do you think?
/r/MensRights21/04/13 07:20 AM
6

Interesting to note (for me at least) that it's a private sub.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 08:22 PM
1

Thank you. She just lives for this sort of thing, doesn't she?
/r/MensRights14/04/13 07:50 PM
1

Got sources for that statement?
/r/MensRights14/04/13 09:14 AM
3

It's ducats. But a good point, nonetheless.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 01:15 PM
1

insist on playing devil's advocate, desirous of a debate on some aspect of feminist theory or reproductive rights or some other subject generally filed under the heading: Women's Issues. One who plays "devil's advocate" must take an opposing position. of course they will want to endlessly probe my argument for weaknesses, want to wrestle over details, want to argue just for fun. That is the whole point. and they wonder, these intellectual, clever, engaged men, why my voice keeps raising and why …
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:06 AM
3

110; of course my score is biased by personal judgement. Am I tall? Well that depends on how what considers tall (no groupings are given). As an agnostic Canadian do I get -25 for being non-religious in a country not listed in the country column (where I am told to choose the closest thing)? Am I attractive? Again, no metrics are given; I feel I have an attractive face, but I am slightly overweight; do these cancel each other out? Oh wait, it doesn't matter...being a white, straight, cis-male me…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:45 AM
2

If you followed the link and checked the citations, you would see that 14 and 10 are from Graves work. 15 and 16 are from the work of others, debunking her model. In any case, the above was meant to provide a sense of scale in refutation of DinnerBlasterX's (IMHO hyperbolic) use of the word "soon". Have a great day!
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:31 PM
3

By one estimate, the human Y chromosome has lost 1,393 of its 1,438 original genes over the course of its existence, and linear extrapolation of this 1,393 gene loss over 300 million years gives a rate of genetic loss of 4.6 genes per million years.[14] Continued loss of genes at the 4.6 genes per million year rate would result in a Y chromosome with no functional genes --- that is the Y chromosome would lose complete function --- within the next 10 million years. Comparative genomic analysis, h…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:04 PM
1

I recommend heading over to AVfM and telling your story there. I do believe you will find support, advice, and possibly a smidgen (that's a metric smidgen, not to be confused with an Imperial smidgen [which is 2.459 metric pinches]) of justice. Speak up, speak out, focus a lens of scrutiny upon those who would keep you from your children (I'm getting good at this bit, no?).
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:46 PM
3

I normally detest the phrase "Half a loaf..." but you do have child with you, so that's something (insert jpg here). Keep trying, friend. Check the sidebar, go through previous posts. Somewhere there might be something that may help (or at least give you hope).
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:17 PM
3

That is a: fucked up and b: somewhat (sadly) unsurprising. Let me guess...the first wife/SO was/is a reasonable/sensible person and the second one is/was a bloody loony/lying manipulator? Do what you can, deal with what you can take, lean on us for help with what you can't. That's part of reason we're here.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:01 PM
6

FYI - just press (read as click) the reply button under the comment you wish to reply to, rather than using "@" (this ensures that your reply is seen by the original commenter [as well as by everyone else]). Welcome to reddit, welcome to MR, and here's hoping you get to see your kids someday. Stand tall, hold on, and know that you are not alone.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 11:18 AM
1

Gotcha (I think). The fact (in terms of maths) that they come in pairs is only important when one pair doesn't match. Thanks!
/r/MensRights03/04/13 11:01 AM
3

I would suggest that it's mostly the apparent tone in which the information is being delivered that some find offensive. The cognitive dissonance (she's been de-bunked, knows it, and carries on blathering about the extinction of the Y chromosome) might be another. Please also note the use of the term "seemingly" (refer to my first point). Have a great day!
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:55 AM
2

"The X chromosome is all alone in the male, but in the female it has a friend so it can swap bits and repair itself. If the Y gets a hit it's a downward spiral." As it has been already mentioned, the Y chromosome is unable to recombine during meiosis like the other human chromosomes; however, in 2003, researchers from MIT discovered a process which may slow down the process of degradation. They found that human Y chromosome is able to "recombine" with itself, using palindrome base pair sequences…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:46 AM
1

Shouldn't that be 22 1/2 pairs for women and 23 pairs for men? 46 total chromosomes (23 pairs), one half of one of their pairs is inactivated...so 22.5, right? Or am I missing something? I haven't any formal education on the subject (obviously).
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:34 AM
2

“Generally there is a widespread societal myth that men don’t experience sexual violence,” Newman said. Halle-fucking-leujah! They have seen the light! Can we get an AMEN!?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:01 AM
3

If you look through the answers provided you'll find that the AMAer says the they find a commonality within the groups and therefore work better together. So, once again, non-issue.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 09:17 PM
5

It's all women. This is different than no-men-allowed. There are men's teams as well. Non-issue.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:35 PM
2

My thanks to you! I have a feeling I will need all the support I can get. Have a great day/night!
/r/MensRights30/03/13 06:59 AM
3

Anyone else notice the Manhood101 spammer in the comments section of the article?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 08:47 PM
1

Nope. I haven't seen them either. But then again, asking for proof is tantamount to abuse you know. We should just take the poor oppressed woman's word for it, they never lie about things. /s
/r/MensRights29/03/13 08:36 PM
1

Always happy to help. Have a great day!
/r/MensRights29/03/13 07:57 PM
1

36 and further behind than I'd like to admit. Thanks and good luck to you as well!
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:51 PM
5

*adamantium Adamantite is a mythical (read as not found on Earth) metal in the Marvel universe (see the Norse Gods) after which adamantium is named. /endfanboysemirant
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:20 AM
3

Reach. Being tough is one thing, being able to (potentially) cut your enemies in half when they can't touch you is another. Partially OT - Wolverine is only supposed to be 5" 0", therefore it makes perfect sense (in fact, more sense) that he would train with and use weapons that extend his reach (beyond his claws [10"]).
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:17 AM
17

I can't understand why people complain so much and do so little about their body. It's easy. Having said that, I am about to embark on a campaign to change myself. Not for media imposed reasons, not for "a woman", not even for my own self esteem (feel free to deconstruct my reasoning). I am doing it because I know I am getting older and I find myself feeling the after-effects every time I perform any sort of unusual (for me) physical activity. I will do it for "nostalgic" reasons (I'm not as old…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:05 AM
8

Aaannnnd...I'm dead. Worst drinking game ever.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 07:03 AM
4

If yes doesn't always mean yes then, by extension, no doesn't always mean no.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 06:50 AM
7

Copied and pasted (screenshotting takes too long). Rachel Sklar: The Firing Of Adria Richards Looks Like Kneejerk Appeasement To The Troll Armies Rachel Sklar | Mar. 22, 2013, 11:30 AM | 44,010 | 170 Email More See Also What The Heck Is A Dongle? A Joke About Dongles Led To Two People Losing Their Jobs And A Huge Mess For The Tech World The Female Tech Community Responds To 'Donglegate' EDIT NOTE: Earlier we reported on the controversy involving Adria Richards, her employer SendGrid, and her twe…
/r/MensRights25/03/13 09:44 AM
8

Here you go.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 01:46 PM
2

For now. Ignoring them will likely become the next form of harassment.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:24 PM
1

I like it.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 08:55 PM
1

Thank you. Clears things up a bit.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 08:49 PM
1

I've gone back and forth between the article and this thread and haven't managed to reconcile this. 1st place man = $25K, 1st place woman = $25k, yes? The way it's written: I keep getting +$50K for breaking the gender record. Am I reading/interpreting that correctly? If the 1st place male had beaten the male record he would have received +$50K? Or has the female "winner" received +$50K for "beating" the male time (after mathematical reductionism)?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:27 PM
1

That all depends on the relative intelligence level of the people being pandered to.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:13 PM
1

That was fucking hilarious. Saved so I can show the wife. Nothing wrong here, satire is quite possibly the best way to get multiple messages across.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:01 PM
2

If we're going to play with that joke...I have two perfectly good excuses: I am both Irish and German, therefore I drink to what others consider excess (Irish) but manage to hold my liquor (German). At least you got "St. Paddy's" right (I grind my teeth every time I see "St. Patty''s"...) On that note...Slainte (I can't be arsed to look up [let alone actually use] the keyboard tricks that would allow me to punctuate that correctly) and Prosit! shoots whiskey and chases with bier
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:51 PM
12

blahblahblah.tumblr.com Who gives a flying fuck at a rolling donut? One more ignorant, bigoted, and grammatically/punctuationally challenged twit spouting their opinion. If submitters insist on showcasing these wastes-of-potential-energy can we, at least, get a bot to auto-copy/paste the page (preferentially then replacing the OP's link with a traffic-neutral link)? Keep this sort of thing in /r/TumblrInAction. The MHRA has real issues to deal with in the real world. The rantings of some self-de…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:40 PM
3

Well, colour me surprised. Who would have thought that mouth-pieces would get up in front of a crowd (even metaphorically) and tell lies? Perhaps we should try it the other way round and see where we get: "when men die at the hand of an intimate partner, that hand is more often than not holding a vial of poison (or perhaps a judicial order)...". Oh wait, women don't murder men, they always have justifiable reasons or mental illnesses... edit - pardon my cynicism, I'm drunk.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:25 PM
1

Read his statement again. He isn't the one glaring. If wearing plain black is "creepy" then add me to the list. I've never met Pecanpig, so I can't say whether his face is "creepy" (as he feels it is). The fact that he feels his mode of dress is considered creepy and that you apparently agree is something that should be examined, not attacked.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:18 PM
1

Last I checked teaching was a male dominated profession when women were not allowed to hold such positions (beyond simple initial instruction of duty). The dominance of women in teaching today is likely to be a result of a shift in perception (ie: men who want to be around children must be pedophiles). It strikes me that between the waning of the attitude of "women can't/shouldn't teach" and the waxing of "men who want to be around children must be pedophiles" there was a point where it didn't m…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:08 PM
2

Advocates for domestic violence victims have long called for stricter laws governing firearms and protective orders. Their argument is rooted in a grim statistic: when women die at the hand of an intimate partner, that hand is more often than not holding a gun. Anyone else note that the statistic claimed isn't cited? Anyone got a source for this?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 10:52 AM
1

I like it. May have steal some of it too. Thanks again!
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:01 AM
3

Congratulations! My wife and I also chose to eschew the traditional wedding, it cost us $150; the only attendees were her parents, her sister, and the family dog (my best being & the ring bearer). Much better, no hassle, no fuss. Cheers for doing it simply!
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:50 PM
1

Thank you. Writing my response letter now. Must remember to send one to my MLA as well.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:41 PM
7

Welcome to British Columbia...
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:37 PM
2

Anyone know who wrote/sponsored this BS?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:56 AM
3

You say that as though we aren't already being accused of that.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 02:00 AM
5

Ah, no. Produced by the European Union Commission.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:04 AM
3

Other official government initiatives limit the proportion of males in STEM fields to 50%. Wait, what? Got a link for that?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 12:59 AM
2

Feel free to PM me with the info then. A link to said thread/downvotes would also be helpful. If nothing else, what was the fact you posted?
/r/MensRights26/01/13 01:07 PM
6

Readily available and non-controversial (read not outlawed due to ill-informed ideas on science). All I can say is that I'm glad (and proud) to still have mine (thanks mom)!
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:01 AM
14

Would you care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:58 AM
1

ALL men are clobbered to death with messages of "don't rape" all their lives, from cradle to grave. Is this not enough? Also, how about taking personal responsibility for your own decisions and actions? That is a different thing than criminal responsibility (which rests with the criminal of course) but it is real nonetheless. True enough; I was hoping for something that might open their eyes (or at the very least begin a rational discussion). The people involved are my sister and my father's pre…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 09:55 AM
2

Works just fine for me. I tried your link and the sidebar, both still work. Or do we have differing definitions of "dead link"?
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:34 AM
1

I see. My apologies then.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 03:36 AM
2

These sorts of things can be easy to miss. Have a great day!
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:55 PM
0

I believe nickburnin8 is on about /r/atheism.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:45 PM
2

One page view. Consider it the sacrifice.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:01 AM
6

Would you care to copy them over for us? I'd like to see what she's using for proof of her claims but I prefer not to give any page views. Thank you!
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:54 PM
1

Check.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 05:29 AM
2

Fair enough. I'd say "have at 'er"..but in this instance perhaps "have at 'im" is more appropriate :). I will support almost anything that brings attention to the movement; nonetheless I have reservations about the possibility of a schism that may do harm. I hope that your sub takes off, I hope that it brings further diversity to this sub, I hope that we will all continue to work together to create true equality. Good luck and remember to post or x-post here frequently! Come one, come all (pardo…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:57 AM
2

Whether or not gay men and women have posted in r/mensrights, their posts haven't been highlighted. Their experiences get lost in the comments or have drifted off the front page months ago. This may be because gay men and women are a small subsection of the posters here. As I said, if you want to create your own related subreddit, go right ahead. My main point is that this sub is for everyone. Gay, straight, man, woman, (insert all other qualifiers here). Doesn't matter. All voices are welcomed …
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:30 AM
3

Curiously, last I checked (30 seconds ago) typhonblue is a mod of said subreddit; I'm not sure how to take her above post.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:12 AM
3

Nothing is preventing you from creating the subreddit if you so choose. Having said that, I'm just wanting to hear other perspectives within the MRM. it appears (to me) that you are excluding/ignoring the various gay men, women, and trans-people who already post here and are welcomed. IMHO - this subreddit doesn't care what you have between your legs; we care about what you have in your head (read as a mind capable of seeing the double standards etc. that caused the MRM in the first palce).
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:25 AM
2

That is my point. Any transfer requires the consent of both parties. He did not consent, the embryos were moved anyway. Ergo he doesn't get a say.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:35 AM
1

I may have missed something there...how does what you linked relate to the protest at UofT?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:18 PM
0

No one was maced (AFAIK). Would you care to explain how you went from sending a letter to the University to people being maced?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:15 PM
3

Fair enough. I was attempting to correct a faulty usage of pronouns; but good point nonetheless.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:38 PM
1

There's a term for this...Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon. Or something similar. You are Canadian, therefore you see/notice Canadian connections more often. Join the club.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:31 PM
1

Et vous devriez vous sentir mal! Boy, I hope I got that right...
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:22 PM
2

They were told that any transfer required the consent of both parties, who separated in July 2011. Juanita Nott, a 43-year-old mother of four, signed a consent form agreeing to the transfer but Gregory Nott, 46, declined consent. This looks to me as though he has been denied a say, given that the case is ongoing.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:07 PM
4

It means no...unless you're a man. Do keep up. /s
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:06 PM
3

It was a guy. Cogitate on that for a moment.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:03 PM
5

No one said the red pill was always easy to swallow. Goddamn right. Took me almost 30 years to get it down. Lovely after-taste though.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:02 PM
-1

Terse, innit? I like you.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:56 AM
1

8 and 7 years respectively (for the 33 and 18 year old). The 15 year old will be sentenced at a later date.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:53 AM
-1

I need feminism because who else will tell me I'm a woman-hating, child molesting, raping, deadbeat piece of cis scum? /s (do I really need that?)
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:24 AM
13

Katy Perry, Marissa Mayer, Taylor Swift, Mellisa Leo, Carla Sarkozy. My apologies for links to Jezebel etc. Just the first ones that came up. They also provide an interesting insight into (did I really just do that?) the media mindset on the subject. Hope these help!
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:18 AM
1

Would you care to explain that?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:24 AM
3

Thanks for not being a psycho baby!
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:23 AM
3

I will also second this, if you're ever in Victoria (BC). PM me and we'll go for a beer. edit - apparently some people either don't like me or have a hate-on for Victoria...
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:13 AM
1

Can't get it to play. I presume AdBlock or Ghostery is responsible. Anyone else with this problem? edit: Yup, Ghostery was blocking something. Paused it and it's working now.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:40 AM
2

I do believe that this is it.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:58 PM
1

It tends to vary based on generation (pun partially intended), location, and your preference of series (see above note).
/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:54 AM
1

I don't care about who you are or where you are, all I'm concerned with is getting interviews for an Anthropology assignment. These interviews will all be anonymous in the assignment, and the only person that will read it besides me and Reddit is my Anthropology professor. Trust me I'm not some nutjob from SRS. Then create a survey using surveymonkey (or something similar), in much the same manner as pretty much everyone else who has run a survey on reddit.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 11:42 AM
1

Read it here or in Wizzad's comment (currently top).
/r/MensRights03/12/12 12:22 AM
1

*seat
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:12 PM
0

Last I checked this was not the "first ever" International Men's Day...
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:06 PM
3

1) EP theories must make testable claims and do so. Example: Robert Trivers predicted that, among all animals including humans which have two sexes, the sex with the greater minimum investment in offspring should be more sexually choosey and the other more sexually aggressive/promiscuous. A comparative study of animal behavior could easily disprove his theory, though it has been confirmed by many observations. 2) I have personal knowledge of colleagues who have had a research idea, collected dat…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:59 AM
3

What exactly is a "conditional pardon"?
/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:35 PM
2

Wasn't really looking to do a survey per se; more of a study of the women I know. The vast majority of them haven't any idea of my position vis-a-vis feminism, let alone MR. They range in age from 17-70 (with the majority being between 20-40), live across Canada (along with 6 international), and hold multiple religious beliefs as well as levels of education (although class differential is minimal [assuming you mean economic). It strikes me that any attempt on my part to explain the reason for th…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 09:45 AM
3

No worries, phukka, that's pretty much what I said too.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 10:46 PM
6

“Encouraging women to negotiate forcefully isn't the answer,” Maatz says. “We all know what aggressive women are called, which makes that a solution that’s fraught with peril.” Oh my, just spit my scotch out onto my keyboard.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 04:54 PM
-2

Far as I know, it's not Futrelle. IIRC Futrelle was /u/Manboobz. This guy appears to be harmless.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:56 AM
-3

Relax Obvious, it's a joke.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 05:59 AM
1

Good to know, thanks!
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:26 PM
1

De rien. Did I get that right?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:55 PM
1

Bonjour, mon ami! It's "cough". There's your lesson for the day.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:47 PM
0

Done and done.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 11:51 PM
1

There is a continuing effort to have a men's centre established. The movement is slow and quiet, but growing. Ask around, talk to female students in the more useful arts programs (read English majors) and you may find a surprising amount of support. I'd suggest asking males on your campus but seeing as how they're: a-outnumbered 4-1 and b-male, their opinions and thoughts will almost certainly be ignored by the regulatory bodies in place.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:04 AM
2

You may find that difficult if you live in the States. I'm given to understand that there are import restrictions on condoms to the US. Anyone with more info is welcome (read urged) to chime in.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 09:49 AM
6

4chan should have been your first clue that this is fake. The story fits many of the potential abuses of the system(s) currently in place (which are abhorrent when abused and bullshit when generally applied); but, for the love of little green apples...4chan!
/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:10 AM
2

I completely agree. Check out the second article I linked to. "Confess to their gender crimes [paraphrased]". Wow. So we should only be allowed to congregate in order to submit to the world-view of those who do not share either our views nor our gender/sex. Again, wow.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 07:40 AM
14

If you ask the students at the SFU Women's centre: "The men's centre is everywhere else." Link to the video made by the students. edit: another link
/r/MensRights14/11/12 10:05 PM
1

His major is in Politics.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 09:14 PM
2

I may have mis-read this part then: I was wondering if any other men were the only dads on these committees I assume the other men were teachers then? edit: just re-read the thread and realized you'd explained this already. Carry on.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 11:03 PM
2

It was indeed mostly a joke. I felt that (given where I am) most people would get it. Apparently not. Ah well, maybe next time.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:19 PM
1

Fair enough. It would seem that the creator of the survey chose to make none of the questions mandatory/assumptive...wow, imagine that...not assuming that everyone has a particular role in life to play...all hail /u/thelastrights!
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:16 AM
1

Can you cite a source for that?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:10 AM
2

Your point being...?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:08 AM
2

Pamela VanKirk Schmidt You can piss off women, Latinos and blacks and expect to win. Wait, what? Did Romney win? /s
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:01 AM
1

I don't have any children (that I know of); I left that question blank and managed to proceed.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:54 AM
3

It seems that you attempted to use/apply logic. This doesn't always work out well in situations dominated by females. You may have also outraged/annoyed them by using a military (read patriarchal) frame work (ie: battle plans etc.).
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:32 AM
2

ShitRedditSays. I'd link you to them but it's against the sub-reddit rules. Depending on who you ask, it is either: a group of trolls (read "in it for the lulz") or a group (mostly male/white knights) dedicated to undermining/satirizing the truth about the legal position of men in the Western world (read RadFemsTM). In either case they should be ignored (IMHO).
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:26 AM
1

I see. Then kindly ignore the somewhat snarky tone of my reply and let us enjoy the fact that she was named eventually. Cheers!
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:39 PM
1

My guess at Asian was merely a first approximation. Many ESL speakers have trouble with English plurals. Russians tend to drop definitive articles as well, so I discounted that one. I'll give you a corrected version of your post tomorrow (later today) if you like. You did get the "fucks" right, BTW. Goodnight from Victoria, BC! PM me if you'd like more help!
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:23 AM
2

The judge is also female. This may have had something to do with it. Just saying.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:16 AM
24

It's nice to see we can have a sense of humour about these things. :)
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:05 AM
1

You are most welcome. If I'm any judge (decide for yourself) your mother tongue is an Asian language (your lack of pluralization [should be thanks] leads me this conclusion)? By the way...only one punctuation mark is required when using brackets. Inside or outside is up to you (unless you're trying to get something published). One more thing (my apologies for being pedantic, but I'm on a roll): it should be "an intermediate student". If the following word begins with a vowel (or "h" [don't ask m…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:05 AM
3

Crash course: First thing I found, but it should illuminate the basic concepts (as well as the mindsets behind them). See also: Duluth Model, Male Privilege, and (last but not least) /r/lgbt. SRS: Depends on whom you ask. Some will tell you they're all hardcore feminists (read RadFemsTM). Others will tell you that they're a group of circle-jerking trolls. Rebecca Watson. Hope that helps. On a side note: As an aid to your written English (I'm going to assume your username isn't a joke)... Oh that…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:14 AM
7

When we spoke with the alleged victim this summer, we did not disclose her name or show her face. Now that the DA says no crime was committed, we feel it is only fair to the trooper that we do identify his accuser. "In this day and age, it's no longer a he-said-she-said case," DA Ben David said. "It's a he-texted-she-texted case." Investigators say Tpr. Bryan Phillips and Audrey Finch exchanged 563 documented text messages and phone calls, many sexually explicit, over four days in July. That's w…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 10:14 PM
3

Given that it says "comment removed", it was done by a mod. If a poster removes the comment it reads "deleted". Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 09:51 AM
2

Welcome! Congratulations on realizing you are a person. Never let society (such as it is) tell you that you are lesser because you are male. Never let society tell you that your place is to serve the other half of the species. "Never give up, never surrender!"
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:30 AM
0

My apologies for the repost. Reddit some times doesn't see these things. That aside, can I interest anyone in a set of blinders?
/r/MensRights25/10/12 08:59 AM
1

I think you did fairly well. Keep trying. The poster may originally have been satire, but it's purpose has been corrupted on several occasions that I am (anecdotally) aware of.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:31 AM
19

Aye!
/r/MensRights23/10/12 10:36 PM
1

Ya Hya Chouhada!
/r/MensRights23/10/12 09:51 PM
3

Of course you have to pay to get in. All it will cost you is your privilege, your identity, your paycheque, and your soul. Have a great day!
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:12 PM
1

Depends on who you ask. Some will tell you that SRS is a bunch of angry, whiny feminists and white knights out to destroy /r/MensRights and the MRM in general. Others will tell you that they're a group of individuals out for a laugh and aren't serious.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:06 AM
1

Good point. Google image search, Tin-eye and others may reveal more.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 11:23 PM
7

Karma Decay will help with that.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:21 AM
1

Ask /u/johntheother. Look up figures on the number of men's shelters in Canada (hint: 1-it's in Calgary). Our rights here are a joke. In some ways it may be worse than in the US, Australia, or the UK (to name the three most popular examples) because we live in a somewhat more "polite" or "understated" country. My apologies if this seems less than coherent; it's been a long day.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 10:10 AM
0

I am not StealthNade but it strikes me that what they are asking is "Do you continue to associate with them because you are hoping to form a sexual and/or emotional realtionship with one of them?" Hope that helps.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 07:46 AM
3

Join the club. I almost fear the day that my wife and I end up at a hospital because she is a klutz and I wind up being the object of scrutiny.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 04:51 AM
1

I am indeed. One must adjust ones approach based on the audience. I don't necessarily agree with the changes English has undergone (and continues to undergo); this doesn't change the fact that I am well aware that one must present ones arguments in a manner which befits the audience. If I were to speak to a group of children (5-6 years of age) I would use shorter words (despite their lack of precision) and simplified structure. ex: tl;dr : No shit, Sherlock. Do you grok me?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 07:07 AM
2

I did indeed. My thanks.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 06:14 PM
2

The original "purpose" (if one can even define such a thing) of language was the clear and unambiguous conveyance of information. Speech is one thing (ask anyone who has ever dealt with a second party that speaks with a thick accent); the written word is another. Whilst the rules may be arbitrary (depending on how one looks at it), the reasoning behind having rules is not. The purpose of "the rules" is to ensure that all those who use a language use it the same way (this engenders an ease of com…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:35 AM
-9

I hate to be "that guy" but...*lose. In a (global) society where text communication (via English) is becoming dominant, correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation are more important than you may realize. *edit: If one wishes to be taken seriously (as opposed to being dismissed as undereducated, potentially illiterate, and/or a troll/random yahoo) then one is (IMHO) best served by being articulate. Given the propensity of "the internet" to correct grammar, spelling, and syntax...the best way (aga…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:37 AM
1

Am I the only one who cannot see the comments sections in this and other (slate, vice, etc.) websites? Am I missing something obvious?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:18 AM
3

FYI: Coloured condoms do exist. I, personally, have never been sure of the purpose of such things, but they do exist. As for flavoured...ugh. The only thing they have ever done for me is to detract from and gruesomely alter a woman's natural flavour.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:12 AM
1

Would you care to explain (or "mansplain" if you must) the irony you perceive here?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:06 AM
1

It took you this long to be banned? Wow. All humour aside...when I was banned I asked for an explanation and got one. A reasonable (relatively) one at that. May I ask what you "said"?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:04 AM
1

Don't get married. Your chance of finding a decent (read worthwhile, non-judgemental, non-mental, et cetera...) one are (AFAICT) minuscule. I say this to you as one of the few who has found one (together for 12+ years). Don't.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:55 AM
5

Hope to see you again soon. Be well, be happy, do not give up.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:44 AM
3

Welcome! Check out the sidebar, watch for the trolls, and do try to keep in mind that /r/MensRights is no different than any other internet forum. It can be a circle-jerk, it can be hate filled. It can also be a place for reasonable debate, it can be a source of hope and inspiration. Women have issues. Men have issues. People have issues. These issues are not always one sided, but when they are...remind yourself that we are all people.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:42 AM
2

Question: What does genderqueer mean?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 09:27 AM
1

I can't seem to find the comments. Is this Adblock or Ghostery causing a problem; or is it that one needs to be subscribed?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 09:15 AM
2

Damn good question. Anyone?
/r/MensRights01/07/12 09:32 AM
3

Dr. Weir is a career diplomat, not a reporter. Vala Mal Doran, on the other hand, is indeed one of the most annoying and useless characters ever to "grace" the show. Carter did, on occasion, come off as a feminist but never a "feminazi" (Ghod how I hate that term). Yes, I am a nerd.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 08:53 AM
1

These sorts of posts belong in /r/mrmemes. I'm not complaining, just saying.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 08:27 AM
4

What does this have to do with MR? Am I missing something here?
/r/MensRights21/05/12 09:42 PM
5

True enough; but even without sources a readable, well-written post without errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar gives at least the appearance of credibility. Poorly written comments tend to be ignored more often than not, no matter if what they have to say is important or correct. Presentation, presentation, presentation.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 09:03 PM
4

It's about how men graduate High School and college and lower rates than men. You may want to edit that line... You may also want to correct your use of cant Other than that, good job.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 08:34 PM
2

Ooooh, oooh...I know this one...ummmm...because...SRS?
/r/MensRights10/05/12 11:22 AM
22

My biggest issue is that no matter how hard she tries, she will never actually get it from a male perspective. She does fairly well...but there are some things that cannot be overcome by simply acting as a man (see strippers etc.).
/r/MensRights10/05/12 08:38 AM
2

Not certain. The response I received in answer to my query was somewhat...vague.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:09 AM
2

I must say I'm starting to prefer the use of the term "female supremacist" as opposed to "feminist". Anyone else?
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:13 PM
2

I would accept this if all the bathrooms one floor up were converted to men's rooms. Otherwise...no. The numbers of facilities available are (IIRC) regulated by law.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:09 PM
3

You don't have to post there to be banned. They have themselves a bot that simply scours reddit and (according to the explanation I got from them) bans various people. Still a badge of honour, if not a trophy.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 03:57 PM
6

Good point. Still made my day though.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:22 AM
21

There is. It's called being banned. Like me.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:56 AM
3

another example of women blaming men for problems of societies. The author is male. Still full of shit though. Yoav lives and works in Tel Aviv... (yep, just moved to the Holy Land) with a newly minted wife
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:25 PM
1

The author is male. Just so you know.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:23 PM
1

Got hit by that bot about a week ago. Actually got an apology for it after I messaged a mod. Strange, but true. Still banned though...
/r/MensRights28/04/12 10:11 AM
2

My question as well. My wife (who approves of my MRActivism) lurks (over my shoulder); is it your intention to create (as blitz_omlet puts it) a "safe space", or are we all invited?
/r/MensRights28/04/12 10:09 AM
10

Will do. Thanks for this.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 09:35 PM
0

Almost every kitchen I have worked in. The kitchen staff does 75% of the work and receives (IME) 20-30% of the tips. Kitchen staff does not make significantly more than servers... Disclaimer: I live and work in Canada, where servers and everyone else are paid minimum wage+ (depends on province) which is NOT 2-3 $/hr, as is apparently the case in some US states. We (both front and back) are not expected to make up our wage through tips.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 08:15 AM
3

Not to be a dick (pardon the pun)...but...source?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:34 AM
2

Yes. Unfortunately.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:28 AM
2

I'm in. I haven't got a lot...but what I do have I will give.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:27 AM
6

Well done.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 07:42 AM
2

Where?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 09:23 PM
2

Thank you both for lightening up my day and this thread. I'd buy a round if you were in my local pub.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 12:07 PM
2

UVic next, maybe?
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:15 AM
1

I'm sure someone could design a bot for that...
/r/MensRights24/03/12 08:39 AM
1

Source? Not trying to be an ass. I must admit to some curiosity. Are you trying to tell me that male pioneers lived exclusively in caves? That men began to build houses purely because women came along and insisted on a "proper" roof over their heads? You also appear to be implying that the first settlers (Eastern US) all came with wives (or other women) who insisted on houses. Have I read your comment incorrectly?
/r/MensRights21/03/12 08:13 AM
1

Testosterone is why we don’t live in caves. Next time you’re driving a machine that runs on explosions across a thousand tons of concrete arching gracefully through the sky, and you miraculously don’t die–that’s testosterone. Loved this.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:15 AM
2

Was this on purpose or did you simply not read what you had written before posting?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:59 AM
2

No more hits for them. Copied and pasted - Anyone who has ever taken to the streets as part of campaigns to stop violence against women (increasingly relevant after a new Alberta survey purports to reveal that one in 10 men think it's OK to hit a woman if she makes him angry), has probably come across the following argument: Where are all the campaigns to stop violence against men? For many who have yet to stumble upon the heated forums, blog rants, and protests that embellish the heart of this …
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:20 AM
1

Ah, yes. My bad. The official day is the 19th. AAM is hosting a celebration on the 17th. Mea Culpa.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:56 AM
2

Half the battle and all that...
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:49 PM
7

It's November 17th. See here for more. Good luck with the day off though.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:14 PM
1

*prostrate Sorry John, I had to. It's kind of my job... An excellent response otherwise.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 09:38 AM
7

Yes.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 06:22 PM
3

It strikes me that this is supposed to be satire. Unfortunately, her choice of analogies is poor.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 08:19 AM
12

I'd like to point out that if you have to dance around how she sees things...then the one being oppressed is you. Look around this subreddit and find some info. Present it to her. If her response is to ignore it, claim you are making things up to oppress or denigrate her, or otherwise to deny reality, then I'm very sorry but...time to take a good hard look at a relationship in which you feel you cannot speak openly about your opinions and feelings. You may even want to think about leaving. Basic…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 07:38 AM
4

She's always willing (eventually). It just takes a little longer and some subtlety. She respects me, but not everything I say. I consider this reasonable as I don't respect or believe everything she says.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:48 AM
2

For the most part, she is supportive of my actions and beliefs. At times she either doesn't understand or willfully ignores problems within our relationship. I usually take a deep breath and try to talk to her about it. This doesn't always work, but hey, nobody's perfect. I love her anyway.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:31 PM
1

Pssst! Don't feed the trolls. As much as I should like to hear OhHeyGuessWhat's defense (purely for research and humorous purposes), there isn't any good reason.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:45 AM
1

The few good things that feminism ever stood for have been accomplished and were then promptly undermined by radical feminism. When feminism was about equality with men, it had merit. Feminism now, on the other hand, is more about placing women on a pedestal as the "more equal" portion of society.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:00 AM
2

No one is charging the kid of a sexual assault. "placing the incident on the boy’s record as a case of 'sexual assault.'" Did you read the article?
/r/MensRights01/02/12 08:43 AM
1

You only want them for their brains...
/r/MensRights17/01/12 05:49 AM
-1

Possibly Canada (Ontario specifically) has different/lower stats?
/r/MensRights11/01/12 10:17 PM
-2

Well then...*clothes, not cloths; "Stop acting like you entitled", should read *you're; *nonsense is usually one word; "someone hold's the door?", should read *holds. Other than those points, well "said". Wear a damn jacket. Priceless advice that most of the women I know fail to grasp completely. Edit: I'm just trying to help. ExpendableOne says he fixes them as he catches them, I caught a few for him. Presentation and precision can be key points in the delivery of an argument or rebuttal.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 03:28 AM
5

As much as I enjoy this site and the articles, they really do need a proofreader. I offer my services, free of charge.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 12:29 AM
1

And the links... one two and three
/r/MensRights16/12/11 09:05 AM
-3

Copied and pasted for those of you/us who look at the comments first: To all those men who don’t think the rape jokes are a problem: (via) This post in particular is addressed to men, not because women don’t rape and women don’t make/laugh at rape jokes and not because men can’t be raped, but because, by nature of the existing gender disparity, men are in a unique position to be taken seriously when they raise objections to casual language and humor regarding rape. Men are also in a unique posit…
/r/MensRights16/12/11 09:01 AM
0

Citation or link?
/r/MensRights16/12/11 07:02 AM
2

If only that were true. I suppose it may be, but...
/r/MensRights08/12/11 09:04 AM
1

How about a copy/paste? Done.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 08:09 PM
3

For those who have no wish to give jezebel any traffic, I present you with the article in question... Can Parents Be Convinced To Want Baby Girls? Women have made great strides in the last century, but a global preference for male children has never been more dramatic. In spite of vigorous government programs to combat the practice, sex-selective abortion and female infanticide are still disturbingly common, especially in Asia. Among American couples, 54% would prefer a male child over a female …
/r/MensRights26/11/11 08:08 PM
3

I do believe that it would required added hyperbole.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 06:30 AM
1

Is the trouble that most doctors won't recommend it/refer you or something else?
/r/MensRights23/11/11 10:37 PM
1

Thank you. Recently made the decision not to have kids and I would like there to be as little chance as possible, short of complete abstinence.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 06:42 AM
2

BC. Health care will cover it? Didn't know that. Haven't had much use for (or use or) Healthcare in the last 15 years. Don't generally get sick or require medical attention.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 05:33 AM
3

Anyone know where I can get an inexpensive vasectomy? Seriously. I live in Canada if that helps.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 09:47 PM
4

Exactly. Less soft = hardened. Calloused : Adj. - Having an area of hardened skin.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 11:26 PM
5

"Hard" is a misleading term. Think hardened as in calloused. This will occur to any piece of skin undergoing almost constant friction.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 11:22 PM
3

Care to cite a few of these other studies?
/r/MensRights19/11/11 10:31 PM
1

The article in full... FAMILY VALUES BY ANNA NORTH NOV 11, 2010 12:52 PM 25,870 223 Share Study: Zero Percent Of Lesbian Moms Abuse Their Kids The longest-running study of lesbian families has found an extremely low rate of abuse among kids of lesbians: zero percent, to be exact. The sample size was small — just 78 17-year-old children of lesbian parents, 39 boys and 39 girls. But strikingly, none of these kids reported sexual or physical abuse by their moms (one said she was verbally abused by …
/r/MensRights13/11/11 01:45 AM
2

Honestly I can't provide one either. However, IIRC, most of what I have read recently (on reddit and elsewhere) shows the percentage of newborns being circumcised is going down (I believe it's approx. 65% in the US). Europe and Canada have always had lower rates (Europe being lower than Canada, but Canada being lower than the US). Check the rest of /r/MensRights for more info.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 07:10 AM
5

I would think he is referring to the percentage of men who are circumcised as opposed to the frequency with which it is currently occurring.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 06:42 AM
3

Once again, a copy/paste, to prevent any more money going to Jezebel. GENDERAL INTEREST BY HUGO SCHWYZER OCT 7, 2011 5:00 PM 24,443 228 Share Women Are The Real Victims Of The So-Called ‘Men’s Crisis’ It's not your imagination. Young women really do have to work harder than guys in order to receive equal treatment, a long-held suspicion confirmed by two recent studies. Recently Inside Higher Education report on changing college admission practices found that both private and public institutions …
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:22 PM
2

That's why I copied and pasted the article. Always check the comments first.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:18 PM
2

You should crosspost to r/mrmemes.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 07:51 AM
16

For all those who have no wish to provide advertising dollars to Jezebel, I present to you...the full text. Boy, some of this sounds familiar. GENDERAL INTEREST BY HUGO SCHWYZER OCT 26, 2011 1:15 PM 25,593 180 Share It’s Not Your Fault You’re A Mean Girl Why can't they be happy for me? That's the question I got from a model named Kaycee*, who has been successful for several years, first as a "straight-size" and now as a plus-size model. She recently got a huge break, landing a major cover shot. …
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:53 AM
2

The ensuing selection is quite blind: is that individual compatible with his environment, or isn't he? Only the latter pass on their genes, whatever those are. I think you mean "the former", as "the latter" would be in reference to those who are not compatible with their environment. Unless you meant the men living in a lawful society.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 06:22 AM
7

I didn't see any attacks aside from ones by the "author". Unless attempting to educate someone and calling out false statistics is attacking...
/r/MensRights20/10/11 09:12 AM
2

We all have our moments. You may also be interested to learn of NAWALT (Not All Women Are Like That) and AVfM (A Voice for Men).
/r/MensRights20/10/11 06:40 AM
2

Men Going Their Own Way. In case it wasn't obvious. Join us!
/r/MensRights20/10/11 06:13 AM
3

We're trying. She refuses to listen. Ah, well. Back to the grindstone...
/r/MensRights20/10/11 06:12 AM
4

Keep trying, my comment hasn't posted yet either, but...try, try again.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 06:10 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 08:36 PM
1

Here's some
/r/MensRights05/09/11 07:31 PM
2

Not to a guy who was offering $15 million.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 03:59 AM
2

I would say that the trouble lies in being able to prove that one was tricked/manipulated into the situation. Birth control is not 100% (no matter what kind) therefore it cannot be proven conclusively that a man was tricked/manipulated (whether she took her pills, whether the condom was tampered with etc.). Pardon the pun, but therein lies the rub.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 09:51 AM
3

it's a national catastrophe that women are able to interview male athletes in the locker room or serve in the military. Wait, what? Who's complaining that women can serve in the military?
/r/MensRights25/08/11 09:16 AM
6

“It’s extremely unusual, and in this case, it’s inappropriate,” Rieger said. “He chose to believe the husband and not her. Of course, she’s upset, but she’s also worried about her children. She’s worried that if she goes to jail how it will affect the children. Did anyone else read that as "Unusual and inappropriate to believe the husband."? "Chose to believe?" = As though the judge wasn't presented evidence. WTF?
/r/MensRights21/08/11 09:43 AM
3

Wow. Isn't that sad?
/r/MensRights21/08/11 09:37 AM
4

The "man" in quotes is meant to indicate a:the possibility that calonord may or may not be male, and b:the definition of man is open to interpretation given the subject. After all, some feminists will read his/her comments as those given by a a "typical male". It is also being c:used humourously given how some will see it whether or not I draw attention to it. This is why we need a font for jokes, sarcasm and humour generally. I am not a feminst I am also not a feminist. Most definitions of that…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 09:31 AM
-1

she said the crimes were still serious, and the law was designed to protect children from the follies of their decision-making. If we protect them from the consequences of their decisions, how are they to learn?
/r/MensRights21/08/11 09:14 AM
3

My bad, possessive is a bitch. Curiously, my spell/grammar checker didn't note it. Hmmm...
/r/MensRights21/08/11 08:56 AM
1

I did my part, did you do your's?
/r/MensRights21/08/11 06:35 AM
5

Of course not. The law says that men are responsible for their actions when drunk (in regards to sex as an act). Rape only happens to women doncha know? /sarcasm
/r/MensRights21/08/11 06:24 AM
12

This is why MRA's look like assholes. This "man" doesn't represent us.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 06:20 AM
3

Hear, hear! Good idea!
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:22 AM
1

You're the one who has no clue about how shelters work. You think "non-profit" means "no paid employees" when such an assertion is completely false. I made no such assertions. I volunteer because the non-profit organizations have little money. The more work they can get for no pay means the more money they have for actual programs. You still haven't addressed my original point, but then again I expect it has escaped your attention; so once again: Why do these shelters allow women in preferential…
/r/MensRights17/08/11 04:37 AM
1

Ever heard of the Mustard Seed?
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:57 AM
1

I live in Canada. No shitty wages for volunteering, no wages at all. Non-profit orgs. tend not to have money to pay wages.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 03:19 AM
1

the vast majority of homeless shelters are gender neutral in the people they serve. If this is true, why do most of the shelters I have volunteered in and heard about from friends and the homeless allow women in first (for overnight stays) and then men only if there is room remaining?
/r/MensRights13/08/11 11:46 PM
20

Especially after being told to "be more sensitive" and "open up about your feelings". What this usually means is "be more sensitive to what I want" and "open up about your feelings so long as they match mine". As soon as you speak about what you want or how you feel, they stop listening or say you're "whining", then tell you to "man up".
/r/MensRights13/08/11 11:28 PM
1

Since no one else has put this here, I will.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 12:07 AM
1

Already there. Only trouble is that some of them will claim they were coerced into signing.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 07:59 PM
1

I see. Never mind me then.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:19 AM
2

Close enough for you?
/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:48 AM
1

She isn't being charged because she's a woman. This may be because the guy involved doesn't feel raped, doesn't believe he should press charges or the cops won't press charges. None of which matters. She's a woman and therefore neither capable nor culpable of/for rape. What a world we live in, eh?
/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:43 AM
2

In at least one recent case it was ruled that a woman can not give pre-consent to having sex while unconscious. That is, she can not, while awake, give her partner permission to have sex with her while she's asleep. I shall look for the source and report back.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:36 AM
11

How sad. Ejaculation=consent? What? Being in a relationship=no rape? What?
/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:15 AM
3

See, now that's not helpful and gives feminists one more post for them to use as "proof" that we're all misogynistic assholes etc.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 03:34 AM
2

Among unhappy couples, even a few extra minutes a day with one’s spouse raises blood pressure and lowers immune functioning. So imagine the toll that extra years can take. Seems to me that in her opinion only women suffer from this. Could it be that this is one symptom of lower male lifespans?
/r/MensRights10/08/11 02:01 AM
1

Excellent phrasing. Mind if I steal that one?
/r/MensRights10/08/11 12:24 AM
3

Thank you. We (I) appreciate any attempt to do so. Hopefully you impress upon them the importance of trying to change that world as well.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 12:19 AM
3

Better that a man be allowed to enter into a career not having to worry about being unfairly judged/under suspicion because of their sex. When the best defensive measures make your job extremely difficult or impossible, something is wrong, no?
/r/MensRights10/08/11 12:02 AM
6

Section 2, No. 1 = Bullshit. Section 3, No. 1 = Bullshit, workaround to prevent non-religious and non-medically necessary circumcisions (read parental preference) from being banned.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 09:43 AM
1

Victory indeed. Good for the judge, seeing sense.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 03:34 AM
2

Right on, my friend.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 11:51 AM
2

I see your point. I don't read it as bias, just badly written with a poor choice of words. Thank you for replying instead of just downvoting.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 10:58 PM
-7

How exactly do you think the author is biased? Did I miss something? Edit: Let me rephrase that in light of the downvotes: What do you see as the author's bias? I didn't notice anything in particular. Shall I assume that you mean the apparent contention of the author that Kris is lying?
/r/MensRights01/08/11 01:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter