TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Georgevpanicker Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by Georgevpanicker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

this is a stupid idealistic shitlib take, akin to saying "if you're poor, just work harder!!!" rather than take a hard look at the Systemic problems that create and exacerbate poverty. Fact 1: Capitalism is so deeply entrenched in our culture that we stopped seeing people as humans and instead see them as products. Women are not exempt from seeing men as products to purchase in the free market. Fact 2: Now that we have established that dating is essentially a free market, we also have to acknowl…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 12:23 PM
1

Same here, although it really depends on the person. Lots of sweet, considerate and attractive overweight women than smokers who aren't fucked in the head. I'd rather take a bullet than date a smoker.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 11:59 AM
1

it is a historical materialist reality that barring exceptional cases, most wealth has been transferred through patrilineal lineage, which is why children take up their father's family name. Men, in today's day and age, attain power through a variety of means. Men know that they can prove their worth through a variety of means. Women know that their looks is their first measure of self worth. Name the most powerful woman in the world and compare her to the most powerful man (you can also compare…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:33 PM
1

yeah, you still are, because nothing you've said actually stands up to real biology or history, it only reflects the failures of the American education system on teaching kids about how the rest of the world works. Bottomline, attractive men know that they don't have to go 50/50 ever. Most women know that as well, which is why they try to force a Chad to commit. Attractive desirable men don't have to provide and never will.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:07 PM
1

men provide because they're brainwashed by Protestant purity culture. It's not the norm in most parts of the world (women usually don't have a say in who they get married to). This is because of religious social structures Bride prices are paid to the bride's father/family, not tothe wife. Marriage in most parts of the patriarchal world resembles a flesh trade where women's autonomy is not recognised (which is where your first world ​ignorance shines the brightest) Reading comprehension is not y…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:03 PM
1

You presented the fantasy that most men have to provide to get women. Most men do not, and "humans are similar to birds" is by far the funniest low iq take I've seen on reddit in a long time (barring the obvious fact that it's not even remotely true). Everything else you've commented shows a surface level understanding of human history and biology and seems to be taken off some female dating strategy PDFs. Marriage has never been about romance or investment but in securing kinship ties, and matr…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 02:29 PM
0

Ok and? Most men don't want to commit. Most women want commitment and relationships. Most women don't consider a 100 porn addicts as options and want commitment from attractive high status emotionally safe men (which is a rarity). Women make themselves attractive because society determines thats the only value a woman has and it's technically the only form of status a woman can attain. Men can attain status through wealth, feats and attractiveness which improves their stand in society. Women are…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 01:16 PM
0

Unattractive women do not have the advantage nor do they have " options " unless we count 2 month old bread as nutrition. And yes, in most animal species males do mate and don't provide. You realise it would literally break the laws of physics energy wise if it was any other way around? You're just mad that your male peacock argument was some contrived BS that fell apart lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 12:51 PM
1

We are not birds. I'm talking about most mammals. Your argument was wrong from a purely biological lens. 2. Women have not had any agency in choosing mates until the last 50 years. You are wrong from a historical lens. 3. Most women do not have the advantage in getting men to stay. Men can provide to get sex, not to get relationships. Who do you think complains about situationships and not finding love? Women and socially maladjusted men (which are still the minority) The rest of your argument i…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 12:47 PM
0

It's morally evil to bring kids into this rapidly failing world for your own selfish desires + Doesn't apply to childfree men + doesn't apply to the dating phase, only applies to marriage+ most mammal species females raise kids on their own and males dont stick around. Most male mammals are not "providers"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:26 AM
2

In most mammals, a singular male usually has a harem of females (and lifetime monogamy is very rare among species), and most females of the species raise kids on their own without any male help. Even in our species historically, the highest band of powerful and desirable men never committed. If we're going the natural way, it just implies that men , especially high quality men, do not and should never commit to women and human relationships are not a biologically natural phenomenon but instead (…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter