~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | My cousin seems to be falling down a right wing rabbit whole which isnt inherrentally bad, but he sent me a Jordan peterson video which worries me . What can i respond to him with to sway him away from dangerous ideologies.Today in "people who don't understand how burden of proof works"... | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/22 09:36 PM |
| 8 | My cousin seems to be falling down a right wing rabbit whole which isnt inherrentally bad, but he sent me a Jordan peterson video which worries me . What can i respond to him with to sway him away from dangerous ideologies.Well tbh I haven't watched the video So why are you posting? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/22 09:34 PM |
| 25 | My cousin seems to be falling down a right wing rabbit whole which isnt inherrentally bad, but he sent me a Jordan peterson video which worries me . What can i respond to him with to sway him away from dangerous ideologies.Just ask him to prove these supposed negative effects. Not with vague chains of dubious reasoning and assumptions, but with empirical data. If there's no empirical data, it's garbage. For this or any other subject. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/22 12:36 PM |
| -2 | "Men need to do better."but this book only re-enforces the thinking that's been enforced and ingrained in society that men are the problem and they're the only ones to blame and the only ones who need to change their ways. Read it already, have you? Or have you just read the back blurb and don't know if the actual book contents are more nuanced and subtle, but the editors used this blurb to sell more copies? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 24/02/22 07:26 PM |
| 2 | "Men need to do better."wait, doesn't that mean 3 in 4 homeless people are MEN? Nope, it's mostly CHUDs. Stay away from the sewers! | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 24/02/22 07:24 PM |
| 3 | I want to talk about something. After a time hearing form women and feminists about how women see themselves as victims of x,y and z, has anyone else gotten the impression that this how SOME women want there world to see them as, you know, perpetual victims?It's like a beehive. After a superficial glance, it's apparent that one bee is the most important, and we assume this means she's in charge, hence the name: the queen. But in reality, she's as much a slave to evolution as the rest of the bees, a perpetual baby maker. If a queen isn't producing enough, the workers will straight up murder her and raise a new queen from one of her eggs. She may be less disposable than the workers or drones, but she still lives and dies for the hive, not herself. Ju… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/02/22 02:51 PM |
| 10 | Anyone else noticed that when men and women have different perspectives on a social issue, the male viewpoint is treated as wrong by default?It's easy to prove women face constant harassment AND few men harass women, in the strict sense of "prove". Let's assume 1% of men harass women in the street, and 99% don't (note that this is equivalent to 10% of men being willing to do so, but only harassing 10% of the women they see). Thus, the probability of NOT being harassed after N men pass you in the street is 0.99N which reaches 50% at around 70 men, and only 10% after 230, which you can easily pass in a hour on a busy street in a big ci… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 21/02/22 12:45 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter