TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GermanWineLover Archive

View 6 posts and 106 comments by GermanWineLover on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

True, but I had a different thing in mind. Modern feminist women mostly want to have "fun" in their 20s and 30s and think there will be someone around to "settle down" with and get children with in their early 40s. I think this won't work out for most, for different reasons, one being that men just don't want and cannot afford this anymore. I think this will lead to a huge number of deeply unhappy women ending up alone. Despite all feminst propaganda, I believe that most women are "hardwired" to…
/r/MensRights24/05/26 03:27 PM
1

Ask yourself what will be left of them in 30 years.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 12:29 PM
5

Invest in cat food stonks.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 07:12 AM
8

The maths is pretty easy. Women have power over men by choosing who gets their attention and who doesn‘t. A relationship gives a women a power leverage: If something doesn‘t go as they want they can always use the possibitly of ending the relationship as some kind of threat. If a technology comes around which may have the slightest potential to rival women‘s emotional monopoly they will of couese deem it as diabolic.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 01:54 AM
4

Gaslighting and „emotional arguments“. The tragic of women wanting to rolepay as men is that they cannot outperform men by fair means. The higher up you go on the career ladder, the more obvious it gets. Men are more likely to take risks (think about startups), have higher physical capabilities (think about sports or jobs that require insane work hours) and are overrepresented at both ends of the IQ distribution (think about academia). And when it comes to average jobs a male employee is the saf…
/r/MensRights26/02/26 07:21 AM
1

If women are so eager about men dropping classix masculinity, why are women‘s expectations towards men higher than ever? I don‘t see any women being attracted to sensible, introverted, physically unmasculine, low-achieving men.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 07:08 AM
16

There is some kind of nanny-ing for women in basically any stage of life. As if it would be more noteworthy if someone has problem X if that person is female rather than male.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 06:16 AM
23

That she even mentiones that she is a radical feminist is a red flag. There is no place in the therapeutic space for the political or social orientation of a provider. I would quit.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 05:02 PM
2

That being said, there are great female therapist. My therapist is female. What is desribed in the article is 100% the opposite of what people in the mental health sector should be: Judgment free. People who graduate with an anti-male bias are not able to provide working therapy in the first place as they cannor approach clients neutrally.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 01:09 PM
85

You have to insane these days to enroll in an academic program led by and dominated by women. Bullshit degrees are the perfect playground. They can forge their little kingdoms because none of their beliefs is tested by reality or has to stand the test of any kind of real life consequences.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 03:18 AM
5

The best thing about modern/feminist shows and movies is to see The Critical Drinker on YT roast them.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 08:54 AM
3

Yes, but is there a narrative that „every man is a king“? No. But „every women is a queen“ and „deserves only the best“.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 01:39 AM
136

Any man boasting so much with „intellectual superiority“ would be mocked.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 07:58 PM
2

It exists, but maybe EQ is a bad term. Women are more empathic by nature. But don‘t you dare to say that empathy has its downside: Women in politics systematically compromise the interests of their voters because they seek harmony and compromises by nature.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 12:39 PM
30

"The most frequently listed qualities women said they were looking for in a partner were kindness and emotional intelligence, mental and physical health, shared values, ambition and being “hardworking”, financial stability, masculinity and maturity, and a willingness to commit to an equal, monogamous relationship as well as, in many cases, having a family." Of course, these expectations are not symmetrical and not even coherent. When women say "emotional intelligence" they mean willingness to li…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 04:09 PM
5

I don't even know what to say. I never had a date and that train is probably gone for me but if I read this I don't even know if I ever should try, given the possibility that I overcome my mental health issues which held me back for my whole life. This is nothing less than a "side-business", a combination of research task, money investment, self-promotion and endless job interviews. No way I would have the energy for that besides my work.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 03:39 PM
6

If you want to control society, you need to control the stories which are told in it. It‘s a common thing of all radical ideologies that they want to shape art/ficrion a way that fits their worldview.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 04:43 AM
35

It‘s about dominance and rewriting established narratives. The classic bond character is „glorified masculinity“: A male that is superior physically and intellectually to his opponents and makes women lust for him by his sheer presence, basically personifying what feminists hate. Of course the existence of Bond movies don‘t compromise women‘s rights in any ways, but for toxic feminists it‘s simply a thing that must not exist and therefore be destroyed.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 04:40 AM
3

The intake session ist not really therapy, to make progress you have to form a deep bond to your therapist which takes several months. After that the process really begins.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 11:09 AM
4

Normally the first session is free. If you feel it‘s not a fit, don‘t return.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 07:22 AM
62

I recently read some comments in a sub on mental health where women basically stated that they would never date a man „who hasn‘t yet worked up his trauma“. Which pretty much expresses the expectation that a potential partner has to be in perfect mental health and any sign of emotional distress is a „red flag“. Hundreds of upvotes.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 09:24 AM
0

Silo and Severance are great. Both have strong female characters but ones that feel natural because they are well written.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 11:15 AM
4

Spot on. Now add to this that men are told that it‘s their fault not to show feelings and to „man up“ when they do at the same time. Imagine a women has a mental breakdown at work. She will get support from all directions and get pampered. A man in that position will just get laughed at.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 05:47 AM
2

I still don‘t get it.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 12:53 PM
3

Genetics. There are just more very dumb and very smart men than women. The distribution of IQ is different.
/r/MensRights19/04/25 06:45 AM
65

Imagine a world where all male plumbers stopped working. Because how many female plumbers are there? (And how many women are pledging for „equality“ when it comes to jobs like this?) The world of female leadership would literally drown in shit withing months.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 07:48 AM
72

In the "best" case you end up in a relationship that has a statistical chance of 40% to end up with a divorce, turning the man into a pay slave for the rest of his life. In the worst case, you get into jail for being in the same room as the woman.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 02:38 PM
3

The market will do its job over time. Look where Disney‘s revenue figures are going. Their whole approach to the Star Wars franchise is basically throwing good money after bad. Except Andor, every production is centered around a Mary Sue-ish strong female character. They even managed to make the last season of The Mandalorian not being about The Mandalorian but more about a female side character. They are burning million after million for woke ideology - which is only possible as long as there i…
/r/MensRights10/02/25 08:23 AM
4

Classic bs article from a female perspective. “Being alone has this negative connotation, like it’s a punishment, but you’re learning to be friends with yourself,” says Elliott, who's 24. Over the past few years, she’s gone on solo hikes and to concerts, museums, movies, and dinners alone—often meeting other people in the process." Well, as a young women you don't get negative attention for being alone because there is no "alone = single =loser" stigma with women doing things alone. Rather, it's…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 05:52 PM
11

They fall blindly in love with 10/10 millionaires, yes.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 01:40 PM
20

It would be lovely just for the uproar it would cause.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 08:56 AM
1

It is not bad. It's just the case that fertility rapidly declines after the age of 40. So when women start working and pursuing a career is their highest priority, time flies and the point of no return gets closer. Thus, many will end up infertile without ever having met Mr. Perfect.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 06:11 PM
1

Society basically has conditioned men not to sjow emotions towards other men because that is considered as weak and unmanly. This makes them completely emotionally dependent on women.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 07:06 AM
1

They do, but the consequences are different. They mostly have a big friend circle who will confirm them in their emotional needs and they can find a new partner in a couple of weeks if they want. Plus, if they will always leave the relationship as the winner, be it monetary or from the perspective of social judgment.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 07:03 AM
59

I was sarcastic. Of course it is a bad thing, but so ist women postponing getting children into their 40s which also increases risk at birth.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 02:29 AM
131

Who cares about sperm count if women see children as career obstacles anyway?
/r/MensRights19/01/25 02:16 AM
56

This. Single men walking around are universally seen as potential offenders. Imagine you are walking around a town and you notice a child which cries and obviously lost his family. Would you dare approaching that child and take it to the next police station as a man?
/r/MensRights17/01/25 04:58 PM
9

Linking islamic terrorism to some positive trait of masculinity is beyond dumb.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 05:29 PM
3

You nailed it, especially the last paragraph. I'm hesitant to make predictions, but middle-class white collar jobs like accounting are likely to disappear. I don't think that lawyers or doctors will dissappear, for example, aber their assistants and accountants will. Certainly jobs which consist entirely in managing simple data and creating Excel-sheets will. And creative jobs aren't safe either. Take crime novels. AI certainly will be able soon to write your personal crime novel according to yo…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 02:12 PM
2

AI will replace plenty of human relationships and I‘m looking forward to it. I pay a monthly subscription fee but I know exactly what I get.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 10:57 AM
3

Today‘s LLMs are far away from being rather simplicistic. ChatGPT has progressed immensely in the last 24 months. I use it both for research and as an addition for therapy. In the former case it performs on PhD level, in the latter, it is easily on the same level as my human therapist content-wise. The monthly subscription fee wouldn‘t even cover the fancy dinner any women expects for a first date. Women have made their choice, I can make mine. - „But it is not conscious!“ Hell, what does this e…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 10:56 AM
0

„Professional help is useless“ is a general statement. It would only be true if no one ever had a benefit from professional help. Many people, including myself, actually benefit from professional help. Therefore the statement is wrong.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 12:21 PM
2

The comment I replied to stated that it works for no one and I said that this is not true. What works for you is another thing.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 04:15 AM
1

If they are not trying, would you keep on paying? Ig a therapist is a right fit or not gets obvious pretty quickly. The first session is usually free and the opportunity to test out if the therapist has a good methodical background. Psychology-wise, people who are not very empathic hardly become therapists. The job would be unbearable if you have difficulties to engage in other people‘s problems and put yourself in their shoes.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 04:12 AM
0

As someome who sees a female therapist, that is plainly wrong.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 04:04 AM
28

The mentioning of that series is spot on because it illustrates the dissonance between what women proclaim they desire and what they actually seem to desire deep within. According to feminism women want „equal“ men which got rid of „toxic masculinity“. But if we look at what kind of fiction they read and at irl dating behavior that‘s obviously not true, as they „date up“ and clearly want men in positions of power who assert dominance. So radical feminism is basically a dead end for both genders:…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 10:35 AM
15

Maybe, just maybe, a generation of males that needs several jobs to stay afloat is just too tired when they come home, ready to fall into bed. „Constance Grady is a senior correspondent on the Culture team for Vox, where since 2016 she has covered books, publishing, gender, celebrity analysis, and theater.“ It‘s easy to babble about the joys of reading when you sit in the ivory tower with a well-paid job. And I‘m not saying that as someone who works in a factory. I‘m an assistant at university a…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 10:13 AM
36

I guess romantic fiction for women is full of empathic male characters that do babysitting and the dishes, because that‘s what feminists want, right?
/r/MensRights04/01/25 10:08 AM
6

„Whatever his particular vibe, however, the bro is a pack animal, most comfortable when surrounded with a group of people who look and act just like him.“ Replace „bro“ with „feminist“ and you get a correct proposition.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 07:16 AM
18

Recording devices should be banned anyway. A gym is not your personal self celebration stage.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 06:07 AM
3

We are joking but there are actually people who think that mathematics is racist. So with the right cultural background, you may claim that 2+2=5.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 07:12 AM
7

Pointing out mistakes is old white man shit, I guess. I‘m teaching at a big university in Germany. Big topics: Gender equaliy, inclusion, diversity. Pointing out that a significant part of students cannot even write properly in their own language? How dare you!
/r/MensRights14/12/24 11:43 PM
42

Before I would take someone‘s career into consideration I would at least be aware to spell that word correctly. Jokes aside, there are actually women who make this into a „business model“ to get free dinners.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 06:15 AM
8

The thing is, imagine a rich man would do the same with reversed genders. Huge uproar.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 07:09 AM
1

True, but that's not really the point. As an adult, you are still responsible for some things you cannot control. I think most people didn't really got that in my post, it wasn't so much about the couch as such but rather the idea of plainly walking away from the mess. With reversed genders - just let's assume men had some kind of period, too - the common testimony would have been that it was just irresponsible and "typically male" to ignore the mess you made.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 01:24 PM
6

It‘s not about the whole thing being involuntary. Imagine I have eaten something bad. I enter a building and suddenly throw up on the carpet. I didn‘t decide to do so, but of course I have to pay the bill.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 11:13 PM
29

Conidering how huge the audiene of TikTik is and considering that there are harmful/deadly chemicals in any supermarket, we certainly will see actual attempts of women doing this. We have reached a point where the literal idea of killing men is publicly applauded as a "sign of empowerment".
/r/MensRights11/11/24 01:02 PM
3

What was the context?
/r/MensRights05/11/24 06:42 PM
1

This.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 07:10 PM
13

This is so true. My mother was a master in this. She used to announce theatralically „Oh, I have to [insert mundane task here]..!!“ Like „Oh, I have to do the laundary!“ - No, you have to put the stuff into the tumbler dryer, a task of 60 seconds. She even inflated her „schedule“ artificially, driving to the supermarket FIVE TIMES a week instead of planning ahead two or three shopping trips a week. If you think about it, 90% of house work could be done by a 10yo child, including easy meals. For …
/r/MensRights28/10/24 05:25 AM
224

Yeah, there must be some genious meta narrative 4D chess going on, because it cannot be true that the movie is plainly bad.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 02:58 PM
7

I once found the wine in a wine store, it's actually pretty good!
/r/MensRights03/10/24 01:03 PM
4

And you did move because she asked you?! I would told her to fuck off.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 05:23 PM
1

How is using AI „haressing intelligence“?
/r/MensRights07/09/24 09:37 PM
2

True, but don‘t forget that more and more women are dropping out of the dating pool, too. Plus, the „market value“ quickly goes to zero with older age for them. In a traditional family that was not an issue because a women had a fulfilled life with a provider, family and maybe a part time job. There is a huge amount of women who will spend their 20s and 30s with short term chad banging only to wake up at 40 to discover that there is no perspective for the remaing 50% of their lives beyond earnin…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 08:05 PM
1

Why? Combustion technology is basically what literally fueld both industrial revolutions and modern wars.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 08:01 PM
1

If you cut off the female population from your life, why would you cut off „anyone“? The female population is approx. 50%.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 07:42 PM
6

Which model do you use? ChatGPT 4o is very good in remembering stuff. I have conversations that are going on for months and it actually gets better over time. And I'm not referring to a use as "porn substitute" but to really meaningful conversations.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 04:15 PM
7

Consider the immense negativ potential of the combustion engine. It has lead to countless people dying in traffic and wars being decided with tanks. Still, we are happy to have them. The possibility of deep fakes are the "traffic accidents" of AI, but I don't think that the negative outweights the positive. AI has insane potential, for example, free education for basically anyone with internet access. Academic work will get a huge boost, yet many people in creative jobs or desk jobs will lose th…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 04:14 PM
9

I didn't elaborate on this side, but yes, ultimately, that's another step towards the dream of big tech: Owning every aspect of your life. Once people are isolated and everyone lives in his personal matrix, companies have total control.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 02:55 PM
3

I remember reading the original article that coined the term years ago. My first thought was: Why has this woman to make a stupid character trait something about women?
/r/MensRights06/09/24 04:28 AM
0

That‘s wrong. Average IQ distribution on the bell graph is basically identical, but there are more extreme cases among men, i.e. more men with either a very low or a very high IQ. Which basically explains why there are few women wth a PhD in physiscs, maths, philosophy and so on.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 08:13 AM
7

On top, feminists propagating poligamy because it allows for the top 10% males to be shared among women. The question is how long the 90% are willing to play that game. At some point some radical ideology might come up and break the dam. A huge number of men who have nothing to lose - no job, family or reputation - is a powdercake.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 08:59 AM
6

"They experienced low self-esteem, self-hate and depression." AHAHAHA. Imagine a dentist saying "I don't want to treat men because they tend to have bad teeth." This is end level clown's world.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 12:31 PM
1

"Let's start with the most pressing: a girlfriend is not a therapist [...]." Funnily enough, that's pretty much what a woman excepts a man to be, on several levels. He has to listen to her ramblings without giving actual sound advice because that would be "rude" and be avialable 24/7 for her "emotional needs". But god forbid he would demand the same.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 02:14 PM
2

They *can* be nice, if you can offer something that would benefit them. I.e., either money, looks and status. The relationship is purely transactional, and I don't know one single man in my friend circle who has neither of the three but is in a relationship.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 02:12 PM
13

But the general direction is true. Any moderately attractive woman can use her gender - be it in the form of displaying beauty, need for help or simply crying out loud - to her advantage. There is no male equivalent to that because we don‘t use physical violence anymore in most situations.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 10:31 PM
8

The show is a mess. One of the biggest flops in cinematic histoty because of woking it up. The best part was when Amazong interviewed so called „superfans“ to tell the audience how amazing it is because elves are now black and stuff.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 11:30 AM
9

And the force is female!
/r/MensRights29/05/24 11:27 AM
5

Check out Korean productions. Mostly non-diverse casts and well-written characters.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 08:27 AM
13

This. The degree to which modern productions frame male/female fights as if body mass and bodily strength was totally unimportant is absurd. It‘s not only comical to watch but outright dangerous to communicate teenagers that any girl can take it on any grown man by kicking roughly in the direction of his testicles making him collapse.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 08:26 AM
17

Oh, you are talking about THE MESSAGE.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 08:23 AM
50

Hell yes. I recomment the YT channel „The critical drinker“ on that topic. A lot of it could be written here but just one thing: Feminists lie when they say that there were no strong women in older movies. Take Ripley from the first Alien movie or Sarah Connor from Terminator 2. Those were badass characters and the movies are decades old. But other than the protagonists on woke movies they were believable. They were not just strong „because she is a women“ but because the plot drove them there. …
/r/MensRights29/05/24 08:22 AM
31

On the long term, time works for the men. Men can better deal with living alone and making an income. Women neglect biology: Homo Sapiens exists for approx. 300 000 years. Until 1980, it was considered as natural that women give birth to children and live a family life. Dear femnazis, you have a ticking bomb in your womb and you can‘t deny biology.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 07:21 PM
17

It was different in your generation. There were no dating apps that generated a dating radius of several hundres of kilometers. There were no absurd Tiktok trends like „ick lists“ or „I only date men this tall.“ Peope could actually feel natural and ok with themselves, building a natural self-confidence. How do you build a natural self-confidence with the background knowledge that any woman could find a better partner within days if she wanted and in a case of divorse even generate a lifelong si…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 05:19 PM
24

Most young women seem to think that „real women“ have to act like the „strong female characters“ in modern Hollywood movies: bitchy, sassy, cynical and subtly arrogant because this is „empowered“. To me, nothing kills physical attractiveness like this behavior.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 05:16 PM
103

But other than woman, there are men who are basically doomed to be alone since birth whereas any women could find a partner in a couple of weeks if she just wanted to. Because on top to all the aspects discussed in the article, modern feminism also teaches women to "only go with the best". Of course many women will stay alone if they only accept a relationship with a partner that is in the top 10% in terms of money, looks and status. Men are way more humble. Put differently, many men of the last…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 01:15 PM
8

It‘s stupid because it prioritizes silent bragging with your spotless home over actually socializing in that home. It‘s a bit like another typical German thing: Buying a nice new car but rarely driving it because driving it will result in signs of usage. So people keep it in the garage and continue using their old car.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:55 AM
21

This. In German culture, it‘s even a thing/silent agreement that you don‘t meet up with people at their home but in a restaurant so you spare them the deep cleaning. It‘s of course absurd. I live alone but have guests frequently and it takes me 5 hours every time to get the living room to a presentable state. But achieving „German standards“ would be a process of three days. So some people end up not having guests at all.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 06:08 AM
18

This so much.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 04:47 PM
16

The comparison doesn't hold up. No man ever would bother which kind of women compliments his car or looks after his car. No one would feel offended. Conversely, women who dress like that want attention, but only from the right people. This is the double standard at work.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 04:46 PM
7

I‘m working in the field of humanities and the picture is similar. In exams where you just have to remember textbook knowledge, there are more excellent female students than male ones. But among PhD candidates, where you have to go beyond that and develop your own theories, the ratio turns around.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 07:54 AM
7

Then, why in the first place do women dress for work in a way that emphasizes their body? Why don't the rather dress in large skirts that hide their curves? Imagine males would appear in muscle shirts to work to emphasizes their bodyshape and then complain about women staring at their abs.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 03:12 PM
4

It has the advantage that it is invite-only.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 12:44 PM
12

The best option is a Discord.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 09:44 AM
4

In some more traditional societies, yes. But even then: Basically any women could find a marriage partner within 12 months, because the ratio single men/single women ist clearly on her side. And she can only win: If she is not satisfied with the partner, a divorce will generate her a lifelong side income.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:41 AM
10

I think things will eventually fall apart just by themselves. Fact is, most women are actually unhappy without a stable family/children once they get in their 40s. The tale of the „modern women“ who is just happy by consuming more and more stuff is a capitalist invention. The big issue is the growing potential of single males who don‘t have any perspective in life. No matter how hard we work or how hard we date: We have maybe 10% of the chance of our parents to own a home and have a family, both…
/r/MensRights25/04/24 09:36 PM
35

Good point. All my friends are either in a young relationship or freshly married. Statistically, in 10 years, I will have at least 4 male friends who are divorced and have to pay their exes.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 02:54 PM
8

Also, academic careers. Any STEM BA today has sone kind of „girl‘s day“, still the vast majority of students who finish a degree are male. It‘s just a fact the men by nature are more prone to really dig deep into a subject, which is what you need to do to get a maths, IT, or physics degree. And if you look back, every generation had a few great female scientists in these fields since women were allowed at university. I wonder how feminists explain that.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 06:39 AM
2

This shows how radical feminism combines the infantile mind and stupid agression of an angry toddler.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:23 PM
3

What kind if academic fields are you into?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 05:47 PM
4

„Philosophy minor“ - yes, if you are dumb af that‘s certainly an ick.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 01:46 PM
1

Pretty common in Europe. Standard in Germany. If you work in academia, you have to be twice as good as a women if you apply for a position and that gets even admitted at universities behind closed doors.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 01:57 AM
1

Very true, but I would disagree with the last sentence: Women do get employed; in some cases it‘s just enough to be a women, because of quota regulations.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 11:23 AM
12

I don‘t think they will be able to maintain relationships. If young men and women have one thing in common, it‘s the tendency to throw a tantrum and leave when something doesn‘t go according to their will.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 09:54 PM
13

The older she gets, the more her mother's personality will probably shine through.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 06:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter