| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | Wikipedia is funnyIt's a ridiculous example. It'.hyperbolic. Plus I don't know if you've ever been through pregnancy, but it's a pretty invasive thing, and it's a lifetime commitment to raise a child you never wanted in the first place. I'm fortunate enough to live in the UK and to never have been pregnant, as I have easy access to good quality contraception. You are minimising the horrible trauma that a woman's body goes through to deliver a baby by comparing it to not being able to vote. And you are extremely r… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/22 08:23 AM |
| 1 | Wikipedia is funnyNo it's not. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/22 02:59 AM |
| -6 | Wikipedia is funnyIt's not. It's using a ridiculous example of curtailing male reproductive freedom to illustrate how ridiculous it is go curtail female reproductive freedom, Yknow like the stuff that recently happened in the US. And the stuff that happened in the past to black women in particular. Who were fitted with IUDs without their consent or consultation, as minors, as the drs and even government policy decided for them that they should not have kids. It's so obviously not a genuine call to sterilise men. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/22 02:49 AM |
| -5 | Wikipedia is funnySaying 'i feel that xyz' is a perfectly acceptable turn of phrase which means 'my opinion is'. Maybe it's a cultural difference thing. I must admit I got a bit annoyed at your reply, as my comment was in earnest and I don't feel (see here again) that it was inflammatory or rude, and you replied implying that I don't think. Which is actually rude. I did question your choice of words in the original post, brcause I found it odd that you would specifically say that the wording you disagree with is … | /r/MensRights | 23/10/22 02:26 AM |
| 2 | Wikipedia is funnyI can see why you would read it that way, but that was not my intention. I didn't say I agree or disagree with the choices made for the article. I honestly don't care. I just clicked on the article out of curiosity and it was surprising for me that the first line was actually the definition. Feel free to look through my entire post history. I am not a shitposter, I don't do stuff to annoy people for internet points. I have no problem with mens rights, though I think lots of the discourse comes f… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/22 01:56 AM |
| -5 | Wikipedia is funnyAgain, not here to change anyones opinion. Couple of things though - Popularised =/= invented. I did not make anything up. I was replying to op who, in the previous comment had said Twenty years ago, the term was not in circulation and the response provided was that there's no such term because it doesn't exist - that only men hate women and not visa versa. I don't think op meant 'it was invented then' just that it became part of the 'zeitgeist'. I can't say if it is or isn't unprecedented, as I… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/22 01:21 AM |
| -13 | Wikipedia is funnyI have no qualms with misandry being a thing, and I'm not about to argue with you about how you feel about the layout of the article. My only issue was that the first line does simply state the definition, which I think is a valid definition, and the rest of the first paragraph outlines where the term was popularised, then offers a counterpoint. Again, I am not trying to change your mind. I just thought it was worth drawing attention to your omission, that the first thing in there is actually th… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/22 12:51 AM |
| -20 | Wikipedia is funnyTBF the first line gives the definition Misandry (/mɪˈsændri/) is the hatred of, contempt for, or prejudice against men.[1][2] I get what you're saying, and I don't really read it in the same way that you do, but I feel like you were banking on ppl not clicking the link to see that the first para first line is literally the definition. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/22 12:21 AM |
| 2 | Oh how the tables have turnedLeggings are not trousers either. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/18 11:52 AM |
| 4 | Bitter feminist tries to shame Elon Musk, gets BTFOFair point! | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/05/18 05:04 PM |
| 27 | Bitter feminist tries to shame Elon Musk, gets BTFOAs far as I can tell, the story is from ladbible and was written by a dude. No idea why anyone would make up stupid shit feminists say. There's idiocy aplenty without making shit up. Also, the article was rather sympathetic and not REEEEEEing at all. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/05/18 03:20 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter