TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GhostBeezer Archive

View 0 posts and 74 comments by GhostBeezer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Her pussy pass definitely got denied… strong fit for sub….
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/23 07:59 AM
1

Girl is in the hinges.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/23 07:58 AM
4

That’s gonna leave a welty.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/22 03:32 AM
14

That’s how bad it was.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/22 12:23 PM
2

That’s a butterface if I ever saw one.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/22 02:55 PM
1

I know how this might go down here, but I got no problem with this. Agree with the “financial abortion” though for sure.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 11:16 PM
3

The AG is awful.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/21 11:20 AM
2

Joe Biden is a God-Emperor and can do whatever he pleases.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/21 11:00 AM
18

Joe Biden will pardon her.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/21 07:11 AM
2

Hilarious!
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/21 11:33 AM
1

Lol ok despite saying “literally” I didn’t mean “literally”. But also there’s a difference between picking a fight with someone, and picking a fight with someone because you know (think) they won’t hit you back, I’ve never seen a guy pick a fight and not expect a fight - that I can think of. Maybe a ‘hit and run’ - but not a ‘hit and stand there’.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/19 03:34 PM
1

Like I’ve seen women do it in real life too many times to count - usually with no repercussions. But I don’t think I’ve ever seen a guy just sit there and love-tap a bigger guy repeatedly without even a slightly defensive posture. Naw’mean?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/19 02:45 PM
1

I’d just at least say it’s more rampant with the ladies, because they’d don’t expect to ever get hit back. Picking a fight is one thing, but picking a fight because you feel like you have impunity is another. I mean entitlement is definitely a big part of it - they feel entitled to act however they want because they know there won’t be repercussions. I may be wrong but I don’t see a ton of videos with guys literally poking a bear and not expecting something to happen. Definitely not as often as …
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/19 02:39 PM
1

You don’t see a lot of men going around picking on guys twice their size and expecting nothing to happen, as you should were it purely an entitlement factor.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/19 02:17 PM
4

Kicking a cop while you’re handcuffed on the ground is insane. Instinctively reacting with return violence when assaulted by someone who is restrained shows poor emotional control and judgment, but is not insane.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/19 07:48 AM
14

Same topic. You can’t take back something you did in the past. Period. These examples are even worse than what you’re pushing. Because in the beginning NOBODY is commuting a crime..., but then the next day, or days/weeks later, someone who was a party to it can decide that they did?
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:08 PM
1

What I’m saying is that even in these cases.- you’re catching time. Even if it’s minor, and clearly just a matter of judgement. But in the case of rape, when both parties are equal to the task, you cannot take back a decision you made - not matter how ill thought out or how bad it makes you feel......
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:02 PM
1

You are either retarded, or completely misunderstand me. If someone can willfully do something, then the next day regret it, decide they were too drunk, felt pressure or were not in their right mind (and then get SOMEONE ELSE in jail due to it) that precedent, if applied across the board, could be used for every other crime someone did under pressure, under he influence or that they later regret.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:00 PM
4

It can’t. It’s just legally set up in such a way that it’s typically not even questioned, and/or to favor the accuser (particularly if they’re female).
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:57 PM
2

It’s even worse. Because some other party is regretting it - and YOURE the one getting locked up, not them.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:56 PM
2

It can be applied to anything you willfully do, then later regret.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:55 PM
10

Consent isn’t retroactive. It’s party to there here and now.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:54 PM
21

No. It can’t be. You’re reading it wrong. You can’t consent, then later - IN THAT SAME MOMENT, or while it’s happening, rescind - like “No, please stop. I changed my mind!” You can’t go through with everything, and then later take back what you did/allowed to happen. The definition of consent.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:54 PM
8

Or if you will - you’re talking about someone who DIDNT break the law, but then the next morning, on the whim of some other person did. You’re talking about someone who was not assaulted, but then later claims they were. BOTH are ridiculous!
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:52 PM
1

No... sorry. We’re talking about someone willingly doing something, the claiming they regret it later. Which that logic can be applied to anything - such my example or any other example of “breaking the law”. If you can just later say, yeah I did it at the time, but regretted it the next day.... that’s the point, you can apply that to anything.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:49 PM
13

Imagine you were an accessory to a crime. You do your part, then wake up the next day like “Fuck...” You think they’re letting you off because you weren’t thinking right? Because of the part you played? Because you have regret the next morning? Ain’t happening.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:16 PM
30

You can’t though! Not in 100% speak. It’s always done later, with a veiled, fogged up version of the truth. Consent cannot be rescinded. If, in a court of law, you said “Yes, at the time I wanted to do it, and gave consent, but when I woke up the next day I was very unhappy with my choice, regretted it and no longer consent.” That shit wouldn’t fly. But that’s not how it goes.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:09 PM
41

Apparently. By law. But only in reverence of progressivism. Every person in real life, including those who support this shit politically, know it’s bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 01:35 PM
64

The only possibility that wouldn’t be retarded is: If you consented the night before, it doesn’t mean you automatically consent, again, in the morning. Obviously, once you consent to something, and the deed is done, you can not withdraw consent.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 01:00 PM
3

This article sure makes it sound like all. Maybe it’s only the federally funded ones. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/04/sexual-assault-title-ix-trump-california-san-diego-215037 From it: Indeed, from a criminal justice perspective, the “Dear Colleague” rules are troubling. They specify no procedures for cross examination—a key constitutional right. And they insist colleges resolve sexual violence cases using the lowest standard of proof allowed in a court of law—what’s called “a pr…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 12:04 AM
12

College courts, with regards to rape accusations, require a lower standard of evidence. Though supposedly that may be changing. The accused’s name should also not be dragged through the mud and permanently smeared, regardless of the final verdict, BEFORE any evidence has been presented, or any verdict rendered.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 11:47 PM
13

Where’s “...laugh?”
/r/MensRights05/05/18 11:05 AM
5

Women say “toxic femininity” to each other a lot?
/r/MensRights10/03/18 11:44 AM
9

Weird I never hear that phrase used then, since women seem to bitch about each other and be catty towards one another non-stop.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 11:41 AM
1

That camel toe has another cameltoe.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 05:02 AM
1

What's Michael Strahan's role in all this?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 12:46 AM
2

You hear that squeak when he slaps her? It's funny.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/15 09:45 PM
2

Hey, no problem!
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:18 PM
4

Pittsburgh is in Allegheny County. Aliquippa is in Beaver county.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 07:44 PM
2

Why are most of these people men?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 05:08 AM
16

He's not recording her.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 04:32 AM
17

Don't forget, it's not assault because someone intervened after she hit him a few times. And kicked him, during the intervening. That's not assault.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 06:32 AM
1

The computers cannot be given the right to bear arms!
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:07 AM
1

It can be done, you just have to read key words and just how far the comment leans into ridiculousness. Starting his comment refuting reliable evidence with "But" is a dead giveaway, as well is the "don'tchaknow" at the end. He layered it pretty well and it was clearly sarcasm. Obviously, tones and emotions can't be expressed through writing without the use of key words, but you don't need a /a to express sarcasm.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 07:34 PM
7

Nobody can read sarcasm on the internet anymore. It's a dead skill.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 08:53 PM
6

The guy was clearly stating an opinion, based on his own personal experience with feminists - one that a lot of people who aren't feminists share. You seem to be asking him to back up his opinion, based on his own experiences, with statistics and sources.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 08:37 PM
1

80%? That seems kinda high!
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:06 AM
1

I eat pretty terribly, but I exercise a lot. Just thought you should know.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 12:49 AM
4

Save them in the cloud.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 07:56 AM
2

Yeah, you can usually tell by the title whether or not the thread is a bit much.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:41 AM
-1

Probably to impress the women soliciting them for donations.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 11:41 PM
3

If you won, you wouldn't have to take the wind out of their sails, or turn and run.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 11:00 PM
20

It sounds like you just described what happened to this dude.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:45 PM
11

You are not comically wrong.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:42 PM

Get a DNA test on that kid and I bet you've got the identity of when of her cohorts.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:37 PM
3

No, "A MAN" is not the same as "Mankind".
/r/MensRights27/09/13 10:36 PM
1

Poor understanding of English is no excuse for this ridiculousness.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:38 PM
5

Did you miss the part where the male hate group was left up but the female hate group was removed? I think that's what he means. They'll leave up "Men Suck" but take down "Women Suck".
/r/MensRights26/09/13 03:26 AM
1

That doesn't matter in this context at all since none of the dead people are bombers anyway.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 03:17 AM
3

Pretty much. Men tend to shine the brightest, or crash and burn in spectacular fashion.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 07:24 AM
2

Are you serious? He should have the right to be able to go wherever he wants, so long as he's not harming anyone, without being harassed and basically accused of being a pedophile. If this was a chick sitting there, do you really think someone would have thought it was suspicious? I highly doubt whoever called the police did so because he was smoking a cigarette - with no children around, mind you. He was in a public park, not a school playground or something. And where did "smoking in front of …
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:57 AM
2

I actually had this exact thing happen to me for stepping off of a sidewalk after my favorite,hometown NFL football team won the Super Bowl in '06!!
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:46 AM
4

Police don't need a reason to question you. You also don't have to answer their questions. You'll probably get arrested for that though anyway.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:39 AM

Is this guy a teenager? Most people who are "confronted" when minding their own business will probably cop an attitude with you. And whoever called the cops could just tell this guy was an asshole, just by looking at him? That's quite the talent. Maybe these people you keep confronting aren't the assholes at all.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:35 AM
1

I would so do this. I'd wear a clown suit or some other such whatever-the-eff-I-want. This is just utter BS.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:30 AM
1

I'm 31 and I've been in two very long relationships and I've never considered it.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 10:45 PM
5

And they wonder why marriage rates are on the decline...
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:57 PM
7

This is absolutely the hardcore truth. Good on you. And it has taken over the corporate work environment, as far as I'm concerned. Byw. By hardcore, I just mean... it's true.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:29 PM
3

They're already paying them for having a kid and all that time off anyway, so the extra 2 cents should really have nothing to do with that.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:31 AM
2

They may start out nicer than men's...
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:02 PM
19

Innocent until proven guilty... except in cases of alleged rape.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 07:47 PM
3

Can you explain "the third degree"?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:18 AM
2

You would think so... it's like if you push a cop, whereas it would be simple assault on a normal person, it's automatically aggravated assault on a cop which carries a much heftier penalty.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:05 AM
2

I think this might have something to do with it. They were afraid of being insensitive and asking her to remove the burqa in public.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter