TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GiantDairy Archive

View 0 posts and 500 comments by GiantDairy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

LOL. So when exactly did this “change” take place? What happened to prompt it? Are you taking social media posts by 15 year olds to be feminist doctrine?
/r/MensRights01/04/22 03:28 AM
0

Yes this is about exposing a disgusting practice. What a little piglet you are. Are you rich? Should you be sterilized?
/r/MensRights01/04/22 03:09 AM
2

WHAT???
/r/MensRights01/04/22 02:47 AM
0

No honey!!! What I’m saying is our vaginas cannot feel the details of a given thing beyond two or three inches of the entrance. You would not feel the foreskin moving and this is also why rubbed condoms are not in fact more pleasurable.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 02:41 AM
-2

Of course I’m a feminist! This right wing bullshit you posted is just that. Again you fail to articulate what “men’s issues” really are. Can there be a “men’s rights” without anti-feminism? This sub is absolutely OBSESSED with feminism for example. There is a fluid line between the redpill and the “blackpill”. There are incels who started with “men’s rights”. It’s dangerous bullshit and it only exists as a backlash to feminism.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 02:38 AM
0

MEN AS A GENDER GROUP HAVE MORE MONEY AND POWER THAN WOMEN. THIS IS MORE CONSEQUENTIAL THAN UNIVERSITY ATTENDANCE.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 02:32 AM
1

Male suicide as caused by feminism. Feminism does not cause male suicide. It did not create or design mental health services. It does not kill people. Misogyny motivates murder on the other hand, for example the 8 incel mass murders.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 02:31 AM
0

LOL. Poor babies. Did you also feel bad for Jordan Peterson when they kept glueing his door shut? Let me counter with a question: how do you feel about incel ideas and culture?
/r/MensRights01/04/22 01:56 AM
0

You can’t feel details beyond two to three inches bro
/r/MensRights01/04/22 01:49 AM
1

Uh no they’re a lot larger than breast cancer. We’re talking about defining human beings.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 01:48 AM
1

No. Within ONE SINGLE peer group, for about five years of their lives, women out earn men. And the fact that men have more money and power than women exists across all income levels and all ranges of leadership roles. Again, in TOTAL, including ALL PEER GROUPS and ALL INDUSTRIES, men have way way way more money and power than women. I am NOT just talking about the “upper echelon” or the “1%”. This is true at the middle and lower income levels also. And YES ALSO INCLUDED ARE THE MALE HOMELESS POP…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 12:56 AM
1

It has to do with the fact that you’re fine with asking the entire mental health care system to change its language to suit men, but think nothing about the much more ubiquitous language that excludes/deletes/reduces women.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 12:50 AM
1

No, what I said was: women are not responsible for not being drafted/dying en masse in wars, as they were/are excluded and did not make the decision to be excluded.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 12:49 AM
1

It says “use metaphors like sports or motors”. Literally. It’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever seen. I like how that’s what you want, but words like “man made” or “mankind” aren’t supposed to be a problem for women. Should they colour all mental health meds blue so men will take them?
/r/MensRights01/04/22 12:42 AM
1

Feminism does not have more money than the government, mental hospitals, or the pharma industry, or private insurance, those are what determine mental health priorities. You’ve failed to explain exactly how modern mental health care isn’t suited to men.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 12:34 AM
1

I’m not sure I understand that last point - gender roles don’t prevent access to services? So then, why are you complaining about lack of services based on gender? In what way are mental health services poorly tailored for men, and how does feminism relate to that?
/r/MensRights01/04/22 12:19 AM
1

What? That doesn’t explain anything. It sounds like he’s saying don’t think about gender because feminists do that? What? This explains literally nothing.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 11:49 PM
0

Where? How exactly is feminism doing these things? Whose voices are being “silenced”? Aren’t you speaking publicly right now?
/r/MensRights31/03/22 11:48 PM
1

How does feminism “jeopardize” men’s mental health?
/r/MensRights31/03/22 11:08 PM
1

You are literally trying to pick out tiny groups like “HR” (what does that mean? There are hr coordinators and hr directors and executives) and “manager” (again what does this mean? Do you have data that shows that OVERALL women occupy more power and leadership roles???) to prove somehow that women have more power and money than men. Men have more power and money than women. This is fact. Choosing to do poorly and leave university is a choice as well. Yet you think it should be accommodated. The…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 10:59 PM
-1

How is that not blaming feminism for men’s suicides?
/r/MensRights31/03/22 10:52 PM
-1

Feminism is in NO WAY responsible for men’s suicides.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 10:44 PM
-1

Feminism is to blame for men’s suicide. Yeah bro, yeah.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 10:19 PM
1

False fucking statements. Oh my god. We were talking about Denmark. Ultimately, what I said was true: men make the most money and occupy the most leadership and power roles compared to women in education. You fail to accept that women as a gender own less wealth and earn less on average than men. “Within a peer group” please. In real terms, the average man has more power and money than women. You attribute this to poor choices, we say the wealth and power gap shouldn’t be due to the biological r…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 10:16 PM
0

LOL. No response. I thought so!
/r/MensRights31/03/22 09:36 PM
0

So if that’s a choice you’re totally unwilling to investigate or make accommodations for, why is the arguably much stupider choice to drop out of university worth defending and accommodating?
/r/MensRights31/03/22 09:24 PM
1

LOL. I’m fucking BUSY. Sorry you’ve never been in love or had a family of your own.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 08:36 PM
1

I guess there’s a big difference between rejecting someone based on sexual orientation and rejecting someone because they were circumcised as a baby.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 08:35 PM
1

That’s absurd. So you guys ALWAYS respond to my stating the fact that as a gender, women have much much less money and power than men -at all income levels, in every industry - with “women choose to be paid less and have less power positions/roles”. Why the different tune when it comes to men dropping out of school?
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:53 PM
-1

No one should be forced to do anything, but if you reject people based on shit they can’t control, you’re a pig.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:50 PM
1

I’m not going to read through cases. That’s super dumb. I have a job and three kids. If you can’t quickly and easily summarize your point, you don’t have one.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:56 PM
0

Yes that’s the law. That’s the truth.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:54 PM
1

Yeah so how are men being denied the benefits of university? Because they choose to drop out? What?
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:49 PM
0

LOL. Good luck with that! Also, what the fuck is Title X? You aren’t being specific enough.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:45 PM
0

Because it’s a super lie. Your personal perceptions of your own experience cannot be used as evidence of your absurd preference for uncircumcised men. I think it’s super gross that you would reject someone based on something they had no control over. There is zero evidence that women feel more pleasure from intercourse with an uncircumcised male. It’s a ridiculous claim and you can’t even explain it.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 03:41 PM
-2

I have Googled it, and there’s no evidence supporting your ridiculous assertion.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:38 PM
-3

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17155977/ https://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/a27046586/sex-after-circumcision/
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:37 PM
-8

Why would it feel better? That makes no sense. What is the mechanism there? Again, it sounds like you’re literally making this up. There is no logical reason it would “feel better” with an uncircumcised man. You cannot feel beyond about two or three inches inside the vagina. How could it possibly make a difference? There is no science backing this up either.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:33 PM
2

I’m asking because it doesn’t sound like the truth. So I’m asking how exactly it works. You can’t tell me, so I think I have my answer.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:24 PM
-3

Because you’re making this up. It’s totally untrue.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:17 PM
-3

That’s ABSURD. Please provide details on how that works exactly.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:14 PM
-19

Then how would you know “from personal experience”???
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:12 PM
-27

We’re you circumcised as an adult? Why?
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:11 PM
6

It’s because of BREASTFEEDING
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:10 PM
23

This is so that women can breastfeed in public.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:10 PM
-44

There is no evidence circumcision affect sexual experience.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:05 PM
1

“all the bad things” what does that even mean?
/r/MensRights31/03/22 11:30 AM
1

OH MY GOD. There is an Admissions panel that enacts admissions standards they themselves don’t set that decides. Admin people - as in office staff - do not make any of these decisions. No teachers do not control education. Otherwise teachers would be paid more and work fewer than 12 hours a day. The administration and principals control it. It’s only over the last 40 years that girls have been catching up and exceeding boys in school, and school was not dramatically different 45 years ago. What …
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:03 AM
1

LOL. I’m sure there’s even more parity when you include the admin and janitorial staff! Are you kidding me?? Power positions are power positions. Money is money.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 01:38 AM
1

Women do not control the education system and are not rigging it against men and boys. Men have the vast majority of the money and power in every sector and education is no different. Who gets the most decision making power and money in education? Men.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 01:12 AM
1

Be my guest! LOL
/r/MensRights31/03/22 01:08 AM
1

She SHOT HIM BECAUSE HE DID NOT PRODUCE HER PLAY. She NEVER claimed to have been motivated by her own manifesto nor any other feminist idea. Aileen was never a feminist and never identified as such. She killed to rob people mostly. Incels have produced 60 victims in 8 mass shootings. “kill all men” - which is not a phrase used in the scum manifesto - has not produced any.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 01:06 AM
1

Literally 62000 women vs 123000 men. Ridiculous. Notice that the lower level positions that pay shit and don’t allow you to decide anything are all at parity or have more women than men. Professors control the universities. They design curriculum, they write the syllabus. They get paid the most. But somehow, women control all education from kindergarten to grad school? We know that the power positions at schools are mostly occupied by men. They are the administrators, the deans, the principals. …
/r/MensRights31/03/22 01:04 AM
2

Literally there was like a 20 post exchange where he kept posting a link to a study in Danish. There are no full time lecturers or instructors. It’s just not reality. You make almost no money teaching at that level especially when you consider you have a PHd. Again, please show me where in the world there is gender parity at the full time professor level at universities.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 12:55 AM
1

Dude I was there. He was talking about Scandinavia, then he said he was from Denmark. Again, what is the gender parity in full time Professor roles? Not part time instructor.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 12:40 AM
2

Sorry you’ll have to show the actual study or link. Also, yes I am talking about professors, not part time “instructors” who are paid $20 an hour. Also we were specifically talking about Denmark.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 12:29 AM
1

What tools do you make?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:36 PM
1

On the contrary. I have three kids. What do you do again? Who pays for your food?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:28 PM
1

Are you disagreeable because it has so many benefits in the workplace? How has it worked out for you? Any examples? What do you do?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:26 PM
1

I’m not a teacher anymore. Now I write RFP’s for a big security services company. What do you do for a living?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:26 PM
1

Still no details on that job eh?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:23 PM
1

Bang on wasn’t I? You’ve repeatedly refused to answer whether being “disagreeable” serves you at work. What other conclusion is there?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:19 PM
2

Dream on!
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:18 PM
1

Do you suppose when girls where not allowed in school, the teachers allowed a lot of outdoor play time and short assignments? LOL Teaching to the test requires rote memorization, which another guy on this thread already said somehow benefits girls. But you want more tests? Adding physical movement into class is something we already do to accommodate lots of kids. But it’s not something that works well with 16-18 year olds. They feel ridiculous.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 09:59 PM
1

The STAFF NUMBERS, especially the PROFESSORS. Even a cursory English reader look shows women are a SERIOUS MINORITY. You KNOW that, which is why you refuse to copy and paste or even quote from the document.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 06:05 PM
1

Where are the numbers? Quote them. Show your work.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 05:54 PM
1

You don’t “have” to have a dangerous job. In any way.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 05:03 PM
1

It’s in Danish. You won’t quote it because you lied.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:54 PM
1

LOL not really. I’m being argumentative which is not the same thing. You’re being obstinate and making up definitions of words. Are you really unemployed? Does mum pay your bills?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:51 PM
0

Why should I just trust what you’re saying when in 2019 this was absolutely not the case? Show your work. Quote the source and page number. You said VERY CLEARLY that women dominate teaching from “kindergarten to grad school”. That’s not true. You have yet to prove it’s not true in Denmark, where you claim that women are most professors.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:49 PM
1

???
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:41 PM
1

Also it wasn’t hyperbole, it was the LITERAL OPPOSITE OF THE TRUTH.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:15 PM
1

Where are the numbers? Show them. And what’s this? https://cerc.edu.hku.hk/seminar/female-professors-in-denmark-and-new-zealand-why-the-inequality/
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:14 PM
1

Why don’t you produce the numbers if they are in Danish? Is that difficult? My source refers to ALL Danish universities. If you have a source that shows men are a minority of academic staff at Danish universities, provide it and quote the actual proof. I’m angry because you tried to claim something that isn’t true.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:10 PM
1

You’re so stupid. It’s on the first page of a Google search. https://uniavisen.dk/en/the-teachers-are-men-the-students-are-women/ You have articulated nothing but lies about women professors and vague, silly claims about “education”.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:02 PM
1

No that’s being assertive. You can’t make up the definitions of words. Please look up the definition of “assertive”.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 03:59 PM
1

Sigh. In total, only 1/3 of the academic staff at Denmark universities are women. Why do you think you can get away with just making stuff up? Do you live in reality even? If you can’t articulate your point, you lose.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 03:58 PM
1

Why would you be sorry for me? Because I don’t like disagreeable people? Again, are you disagreeable at work? How’s that working out for you?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 03:43 PM
1

You’ve failed to articulate the “systemic” issue. Please provide data that shows women make up more than half of the professors in universities in your country.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 03:42 PM
1

Do you think being disagreeable helps you get raises? Because hell no, it does not. Are you disagreeable at your workplace?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 03:16 PM
1

Read your definitions again. How is there benefit there? You act like that people dislike you and you don’t get what you want. Simple.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 03:08 PM
1

You don’t see how being this way makes you disliked???
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:58 PM
1

Please look up the definition of “disagreeable”.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:54 PM
1

Disagreeable LITERALLY means “unfriendly and bad-tempered”. As a person with a real job at a very large company, I can tell you it’s not something anyone likes, and it ABSOLUTELY does make people dislike you. Again, I think you are confusing “disagreeable” with “assertive”.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:50 PM
1

Disagreeableness makes people dislike you. That’s it. If you don’t like people, they won’t like you. You can’t be a dick to people and expect them to promote you or give you a raise. How can you “see history”? Do you mean like a movie? Explain how disagreeable boys who would rather go out and play football are going to learn from going to a museum. I am a certified teacher. We were taught to make accommodations for boys that allow for more physical movement, but there isn’t a lot else to change.…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:47 PM
1

How is disagreeableness not a negative trait? How can it possibly serve someone? Note that this is distinct from “assertiveness”, you seem unaware of the difference. How do you learn literature by playing with your hands? history? geography? Philosophy? All studying is “tedious”, yet there are many male scholars. Workplaces today are not all about working with your hands. Most require you to be agreeable and work with a team. Listen to instructions. Watch details. Higher order thinking is requir…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:38 PM
1

Are you saying professors don’t teach? Also you were very clear “kindergarten TILL grad school”. At BOTH the undergraduate and graduate levels, professors are mostly men. Have you ever been to university? Did you don’t know professors teach both undergrad and grad students??? Aside from more active breaks I’m not seeing what other changes could or should be made.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:14 PM
2

Girls are not argumentative? Are you joking me bro? What the hell does “more around more” mean? Do you mean “move”? If boys are “less agreeable” how could we possibly arrange school/the world around that? These “traits” are not acceptable in workplaces. What good does it do to accept them at school? We’d all love to “go out and play football” instead of work/school. Are we helping boys by telling them it’s cool to indulge that impulse when work needs to be done? How does the modern workplace acc…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 01:04 PM
1

What sexist attitudes? What needs to change to make education better for boys exactly?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 12:38 PM
1

Yes it is. Especially in nursing. Still opposed to teacher's unions?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 12:36 PM
1

Exactly what has changed?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 12:36 PM
1

This has created a perpetuating issue of primarily women being in charge of education (from kindergarten till grad school) This is patently untrue. At the university level, most professors are men. The values we normally attribute to boys (and tomgirls) were cast aside and devalued in an educational setting. What values are these exactly? What exactly needs to change?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 12:35 PM
1

Be specific. What is it exactly?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 12:26 PM
2

Artificial wombs are being designed for pre-term babies. They are not being developed to make men capable of having babies on their own, nor anyone else. The cost will absolutely be prohibitive for most, and there’s no way it will ever not be a much higher risk than regular pregnancy.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 12:20 PM
0

It isn’t a statement that advocates for violence. That’s why it hasn’t caused any violence. No one has ever posted or liked “kill all men” and then gone out and killed or injured a man. Ok the other hand, the misogyny of inceldom HAS inspired MULTIPLE murders, with 60 victims so far.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:56 AM
1

Please read what I just posted.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:35 AM
1

It’s useless. It’s a trolly type thing to say out of frustration with patriarchy and sexism.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:33 AM
1

Sure it’s unacceptable. It’s just not dangerous.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:27 AM
1

So you’re just going to refuse to answer my question?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:26 AM
1

How are inceldom and feminism the same “extreme” again?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:22 AM
1

She did not kill him because of feminism. She shot him because he wouldn’t produce her play. She did not kill him as part of some kill all men project. Incel murders are contemporary. One just happened in my city like three years ago.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:04 AM
0

What does “develop and expand” mean? We know that incel ideas cause death. Where does feminism lead to mass murder? There is absolutely no evidence the woman was motivated by feminism. None. She did not post on feminist forums.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:03 AM
0

Sorry, I missed the part where you showed that “kill all men” leads to actual killings. How are feminism and inceldom equal again?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:01 AM
1

Sure! I’m not saying it’s acceptable behaviour, I’m just saying it’s not dangerous.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 09:59 AM
0

Oh yeah. Did she use the hashtag? Did she post on feminist websites/forums? Where is the direct link between feminist “misandry” and this woman’s murders? There have been more than 60 victims of incel ideology so far.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:14 AM
-4

Yes. For example: incels do mass murders because of what they believe about women and feminism. There is no “misandrist” equivalent.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:04 AM
-12

Sorry when has “kill all men” led to the deaths or injury of men?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 01:36 AM
-4

From the original post “men don’t have to be toxically masculine to be men”. No, no they don’t.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 01:35 AM
1

Because only one side is dangerous, only one side produces murder. The other side has legitimate concerns about a wealth and power gap they are on the wrong side of. I’m guessing you’re very young, but because women breastfeed they usually find themselves the full time parent, and they usually make less than their husbands anyway, and usually make less than what daycare costs. So they are, on the basis of biology, being excluded from access to the power and money that comes from being able to fi…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:37 PM
0

No one said hate was ok. “Kill All Men” is an expression of frustration with the fact that women own a fraction of the money and occupy a small percentage of the management and leadership roles in society for reasons other than our comparable abilities and talents. We are punished for participating in the reproductive process meaningfully. It does not reference a hatred of men even remotely like the hatred of women by incels. This forum is obsessed with feminism and hates it with a passion, but …
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:22 PM
1

What does “real person” mean? I will answer any question you have about my life. It’s the ideology I’m calling attention to. Other ideologies, such as extreme hate Islam (as in the Taliban) and white supremacy have also caused lots of violence. I don’t “consider the feelings” of white supremacists who kill Black people. I’m willing to say that the young men drawn to these ideas are suffering and need help, but I will never say their ideas about women are justified or understandable.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:11 PM
1

They don’t do mass murders. That’s the difference.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:03 PM
1

Why? Because it means you lost the argument?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:03 PM
1

1 in 5 sex workers experience injury or death. This is more injury and death than any male dominated profession.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:51 PM
1

You progress from the redpill to the blackpill. This is common knowledge. The “root cause” of inceldom is misogynist entitlement. There are lots of lonely people who aren’t obsessed with hate.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:49 PM
2

Women who die in childbirth don’t “choose” to die either, but they did choose to carry their pregnancy didn’t they? How are workplace injuries caused by feminism again? When sex workers are murdered or grossly injured (at rates much higher than men at work) is that their choice as well? Did they choose to die somehow? It’s a dangerous line of work.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:45 PM
1

There can be no blackpill without the redpill. They are inextricable. So you think “mistreated” people are justified in mass murdering? The ideas incels disseminate inspire violence and murder. There is no denying that.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:41 PM
-7

But in both cases it was a “choice” right?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:35 PM
-11

But if men are choosing these jobs, why be concerned? You’re not concerned about how women own a fraction of the money and occupy a fraction of the management and leadership roles because they “choose” that, so what’s the difference?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:17 PM
2

Correct!
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:10 PM
-16

Yes!!! This is what is meant by the term “toxic masculinity”. It’s bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:10 PM
-10

If he’s choosing, why are we concerned? You’re not concerned about women choosing low pay right?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:07 PM
3

Incels are misogynists. Their misogyny motivated their murders. So women have been subject to violence due to misogyny. This is not counting the dozens of serial killers whose victims were exclusively women and whom readily admitted they hated women. You can’t blame teachers for students’ murders. Murder is not justified. Incels want to be issued women, they feel entitled to women’s bodies. This is not rational. There are plenty of lonely men that aren’t obsessed with hating women. There is NO e…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:22 PM
3

Also inceldom is misogynist, so yes. Ted Bundy was a misogynist. Many serial killers said they hate women and that’s why they killed them.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:44 PM
3

Why are you moving the goalposts?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:42 PM
1

No Eliot Rodger was very clear about having taken the redpill and that his murders were about killing women and hating women for rejecting him. That’s why he’s an incel hero. As in the article which you did not read, incel murders are defined as such because the killer claimed to be an incel, said incel ideas prompted the murders, or frequented incel forums and posted regularly. It’s in the Wikipedia article.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:42 PM
3

The hashtag has not killed anyone or inspired any murders. Misandry has not inspired violence and does not inspire murder. It does not cause suicide. Men do not cite feminism as the reason for their suicides in their suicide notes, except when they murder and then shoot themselves like Eliot Rodger.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:39 PM
3

Why are you moving the goalposts? You want to make an argument that “misandry” causes INDIRECT violence and death, but this is ridiculous. I could make a much more cogent argument about patriarchy and misogyny causing much more death and destruction indirectly. “Misandry” does NOT cause violence or murder. “Misandrists” do not gather on the internet and talk about killing men or lavish praise on mass murderers like Eliot Rodger. “Misandry” does not pose a physical threat to men. There are no fem…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 04:53 PM
3

I said “misandry” does not cause violence. It does not inspire murders. No mass murderer has EVER said, “I did this because of feminism”. But incels HAVE.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 04:31 PM
2

No they are no equivalent. One causes mass murder repeatedly, the other does not.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 04:29 PM
3

As I’ve said over and over again, “misandry” has not been cited as a motivator for mass murder. There is no equivalent group of misandrists on the internet or elsewhere like incels. Feminism does not cause murder the same way that redpill anti-feminism does.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 04:29 PM
3

Most people do not murder for good reasons. There are exactly zero reasons to justify murder, let alone mass murder. There is also a difference between murdering for personal and political reasons. Incel murderers are motivated by ideology, by politics, which is why they are defined as terrorists in many places. Your personal experience is anecdotal. It does not compare to actual crime data. It does not indicate that women are as likely to use violence as men. I have never and would never define…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:05 PM
2

No replies. So much courage on this sub! So much integrity!!
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:36 PM
2

So is all male violence women’s fault? If the woman is a bitch, can he kill her and claim your argument?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:34 PM
1

I’m not trolling AT ALL. I’m stating facts. I’m not trying to get a reaction. I’m trying to wake you guys up!!!!
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:30 PM
1

Yeah so, pretending something is real is not the same as it being real. And of course women are as capable of murder as men. They just don’t do it nearly as often. Keep dreaming! LOL
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:21 PM
3

No, I said you would be “hard pressed” because the reality is, the vast majority of mass shooters and serial killers are men. This is fact. I love to watch a show called “Deadly Women”. It’s about female murderers. It’s interesting because the stories are exceptional - most murders are done by men. This is what makes the show worth watching. This is what makes it interesting. Because the reality is, men kill way way way way more often than women.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:00 PM
4

These two incidents have nothing to do with feminism or “kill all men” Nothing. Zero. There are also many many many mass shootings by men that were not motivated primarily by anti-feminism or a hatred of women (although a great deal of serial killers have said they hate women and that’s why they kill them). The hashtag has not inspired any murders. There is no evidence of that. At all. In any way. Feminism DOES NOT have women “willing to commit” violence. “Kill all Men” does NOT inspire violence…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 01:55 PM
4

Feminists HAVE NOT been “historically very violent”. After the first wave (and remember, they were fighting for the RIGHT TO VOTE), there was no more violence. The 2nd wave of feminism was much much larger than the 1st, and feminism has flourished across the globe. No feminist mass murders. There were no deliberate killings of men even in the 1st wave. Women have never ever mass murdered strangers in the name of feminism. You would be hard pressed to find a woman who ever committed a mass shooti…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 01:35 PM
2

Let’s talk about what’s real. Not what happened literally 100 years ago. What we were actually talking about was “kill all men” and whether it poses a danger or causes violence. The answer is a definitive no. Redpill inceldom? Yes. So much so that they have been designated terrorists. 60 victims. Deaths. Murders. There is no comparison. There is no equivalent “extreme” on the feminist side.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 01:17 PM
-3

Ok so no, no feminists have ever murdered in the name of feminism. There has never been a case of a woman mass murdering strangers who has been motivated by feminism. Incels, on the other hand, have committed at least 8 mass murders that were explicitly motivated by inceldom. This was determined when the killers actively identified as redpill or incel after the murders or had been posting in incel forums threatening or expressing violent intentions. Here is a Wikipedia article, as usual I will r…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 12:30 PM
-6

Oh no you’re right, hate causes violence. It’s just that “kill all men” has yet to produce even an injury let alone a death, while redpilled incels have so far killed more than 60 people.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 11:38 AM
0

Yeah no we started labeling incels those things after they started mass murdering people. Seemed apt.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:17 AM
1

“Women control 60% of the wealth”. Explain how ownership of the wealth does not confer a distinct advantage.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:11 AM
1

So, you have not suffered at the hands of feminism. How predictable. “All” is a euphemism for vast majority. Feminism has not asserted “cheating” as the reason for patriarchy. We want to find out why the gaps exist and then close them. Did you go to university? Why not?
/r/MensRights28/03/22 02:46 PM
1

Is anti-racism also “cheating”? Stay in school kid.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 02:32 PM
1

This is absurd. So women should just settle for a tiny fraction of the money and power? No.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:28 PM
1

How exactly - specifically, individually - has feminism “vandalized your standard of life”? If patriarchy doesn’t exist, why do men have all the money and power compared to women? Why do women take their husband’s names after marriage? Why are women “given away” by their fathers?
/r/MensRights28/03/22 12:21 PM
0

Literally has nothing to with present day feminists or feminism, which is absolutely anti-war. This is like saying all Americans support slavery because it happened in the past.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:27 AM
0

What issue? The rules of war that men themselves designed?
/r/MensRights27/03/22 09:47 PM
1

No I said they ARE EXCLUDED. They have been excluded for literally 1000’s of years. Have you heard of Joan of Arc? Fucking Mulan? Please. Again the OP is a man complaining that women are to blame for war.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 08:32 PM
-1

No see the OP is trying to blame war on women, when men invented it. That was my point.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 08:27 PM
-1

Uh no, because those things are good. War is bad.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 08:18 PM
1

In the latest Spiderman movie, Spider-Man was shorter than his girlfriend. That movie is SUPER popular.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 05:01 PM
-4

Sorry men’s suicides are women’s fault?
/r/MensRights27/03/22 05:00 PM
-6

Except men invented war. They invented all this. They came up with the governance structure. They run it. This is about classifying the worth of different types of men. Women have absolutely nothing to do with it. They are entirely excluded.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 04:56 PM
-1

Yes, you asserted a false claim without evidence, I shall dismiss it without evidence.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:29 PM
0

Women can sexually assault anyone. Rape is a word for penis penetration into a victim. Again, no one thinks this. Feminists have been calling for male birth control for decades.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 10:14 PM
-8

Feminists don’t say stuff like this. There are actual feminist organizations, scholars, politicians and they don’t say stuff like this.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 10:01 PM
-5

I don’t know if you’re referencing the gravely misled fools at FDS or what, but feminism does not advocate for eugenics. No one wants to have children with a man whose fathered dozens of other kids. This is absurd. No feminists want to forcibly sterilize men based on physical appearance. Feminists want to share equal responsibility for birth control.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 09:54 PM
0

Isn’t it grand people like you have absolutely no impact on the production and distribution of birth control?
/r/MensRights25/03/22 09:51 PM
0

Because are you going to stop having sex once children aren’t possible?
/r/MensRights25/03/22 09:44 PM
-5

Feminists ARE onboard with birth control for men. We DO NOT want all of the responsibility for it to fall on us only.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 09:42 PM
-4

That’s not evidence at all. Feminists support the development of male birth control and discussing the implications is not opposition.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 09:42 PM
-7

Feminists have been calling for male birth control for decades, because then the responsibility for it is shared rather than all on women.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 09:35 PM
1

Yes it is. I suspect this is the root of the issue.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 09:35 PM
1

So you’re saying when police catch a woman criminal, they just let them go? Even when they do violent crimes?
/r/MensRights25/03/22 04:58 PM
2

Ok no, that’s bullshit. She had a large large hand in organizing the first ever UN Women’s conference. She made a coalition that eventually developed the focus on the girl campaigns.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 03:25 PM
1

Most rapes DO NOT happen “towards children”.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 02:30 PM
0

They are NOT as likely to be violent.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 02:30 PM
0

You don’t get money for making false accusation of crimes.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 02:29 PM
1

Oooh sounds ominous. I’m super scared.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:56 AM
1

Is the military still mostly voluntary? Which gender volunteers more? Men go to war because men like it.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 01:37 AM
1

Because they are a tiny percentage of the people responsible for war. War is authorized, organized, and engaged by men. This is the rule. Women are exceptions that prove the rule.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 01:25 AM
-11

I will always help strangers in need whenever possible.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 11:36 PM
-1

Hahahaha.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 11:35 PM
0

They already do.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 11:34 PM
-22

Yeah hospitals turn away men all the time just because they’re men. LOL
/r/MensRights24/03/22 10:46 PM
-26

Well I’ve been married for 20 years and I have a son so I help them on the daily, with everything. I don’t avoid helping men in any context.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 10:45 PM
0

What facts? He wants Ukrainian women to ship their babies off to strangers? In 1939 many of those kids were going to relatives. It’s ridiculous to just dismiss children and mothers.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 10:44 PM
-7

I have helped and I have been helped. I will continue to help.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 10:43 PM
1

Oh my god you’re not fooling anyone.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:12 PM
-22

Again, show me where they’ve said that MRA moderators aren’t fully “human”.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:10 PM
-1

I’m responding to a comment you made where you say all “females” are fundamentally inferior to men. I saved the comment.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:09 PM
-25

The fucking original post. I challenge you to find a feminist sub post that openly asks if MRA’s are “really human”.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:04 PM
-1

Nah I think it’s pretty low bud
/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:01 PM
-2

This sub’s days are numbered.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 08:59 PM
-1

Call what out? What did you say to get banned?
/r/MensRights24/03/22 08:57 PM
-40

No, you’re the ones who get shut down every time, because you are the ones saying things like women aren’t really human. This sub is running out of time.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 08:57 PM
-72

Ok, just don’t expect any help when you need it, from anyone ever.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 08:55 PM
-4

LOL those are being developed for premature infants not because misogynists want to breed
/r/MensRights24/03/22 08:45 PM
5

Look at crime data from police precincts.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:59 PM
-19

That’s absurd. If women wanted to do violent crime, they would. Some do. Not nearly as often as men, but they do. According to your logic single women without kids should all be violent criminals. Why aren’t they?
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:59 PM
-14

That’s absurd. If women wanted to do violent crime, they would. Some do. Not nearly as often as men, but they do. According to your logic single women without kids should all be violent criminals. Why aren’t they?
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:58 PM
1

This is from the early 20th century. The early feminists were racist too, we’ve discarded both. Contemporary feminism is anti-war.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:13 PM
0

I gave you an example of equity and you agreed with it. You believe in equity it seems, so long as it does not apply to women. What about my school application example don’t you agree with? You’re giving up because you lost and can’t argue with my valid points and examples. You lose! Thanks for playing!
/r/MensRights24/03/22 05:56 PM
0

Who argues for quotas?
/r/MensRights24/03/22 05:52 PM
0

The intervention you describe is used by feminists and benefits women as well. I didn’t say anything about quotas. And you didn’t address any of my points.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 05:39 PM
-2

That’s ridiculous. This is like saying you shouldn’t build ramps because people in wheelchairs have “equal opportunity” to stairs. Creating equality is important and necessary. When outcomes are not positive or equal, we need to look at the opportunity to see if barriers exist that aren’t being addressed. For example, in my school district in Toronto, there are many specially focused schools to choose from. The district noticed that the representation of immigrant/newcomers is low at these schoo…
/r/MensRights24/03/22 05:28 PM
-1

No I’m talking about all leadership positions, from supervisors to managers to senior managers to principals and policy makers. I’m not talk about Bill Gates.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 05:17 PM
2

It doesn’t matter. In Canada, our Prime Minister identifies as feminist and has given us a gender balanced cabinet and universal child care for $10 a day. In the end good always wins.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 04:41 PM
-1

Radical feminists are defined by their desire to make change at the deepest and highest levels of society in order to improve women’s status in society. Feminists hate sexism, not men. It’s impossible to discuss this because you are hiding your true opinions about women underneath this transparent “egalitarianism”. For example, I remind you that women own a fraction of the wealth (and have less money on average across all income levels) and occupy a small percentage of the leadership and power r…
/r/MensRights24/03/22 04:14 PM
1

citation needed
/r/MensRights24/03/22 04:04 PM
1

Please indicate where modern feminists encouraged men to go to war. By the 60’s feminist was in part defined by anti-war protest. War was defined as patriarchal. Which it is.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 04:03 PM
-5

So you’re an anti-feminist, you just don’t say this out loud because you’re afraid.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 02:46 PM
0

Feminists have NEVER EVER fought male birth control EVER.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 02:43 PM
-2

In Canada, feminists were the ones who fought for the term “sexual assault” to be used legally instead of “rape”. 96% of sexual crimes are perpetrated by men.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 02:42 PM
-14

My point is you can’t take credit for this. MRA’s have yet to make any real change.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 01:24 PM
-19

Explain how you support feminism. You’re not fooling anyone.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 01:09 PM
-23

Note that this man is not an anti-feminist and does not identify as a men’s rights activist.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 01:02 PM
1

I notice you are pretty short on details, including what country you live in and what laws you’re talking about. You decline to name the “NGO” you’re “involved” with. What pedophilia law has ever not been gender neutral? Besides, 96% of sexual offenders are male. I love this “without accountability” notion. What does that even mean? How are women less accountable than men?
/r/MensRights24/03/22 11:22 AM
1

Are you insane?
/r/MensRights24/03/22 12:16 AM
0

This is such a ridiculous post. What “exempt professionals” would have the time and space to look after children when they are working at their farming and other “exempt professions”? Do you think they don’t already have children themselves? What is the grandparents are dead or in another country? What if they’re disabled or sick? Handing your children over to “random” people aside, how do you suppose these children would be transported? Who would pay for their care? Keep in mind the banks have …
/r/MensRights23/03/22 10:59 PM
1

What changes? Be specific. What “landmark decisions?” Explain how MRA’s are responsible for the changes. LOL. Feminists have nothing to do with child support decisions. The situation you’re talking about is super rare. I have been doing various kinds of “business” for 25 years. I currently work at a large security services company. I think it’s interesting that you tell me to talk to my husband when clearly the information I gave you is based on talking with my husband about work.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 10:55 PM
1

Have you “corrected” any “anti-male” laws yet? I’ve been an activist for a long time and have changed many things. What’s your excuse? Don’t tell me “society” cause society never wants to change. Where’s your petitions? Where are your protests? If you think business is “cut throat” I bet your income is low. Big business no longer tolerates aggression and assholery. Bullying is not allowed. Diversity and Inclusion are what’s happening now. It’s about technical knowledge and getting along with peo…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 03:03 PM
-2

Women have children. Who is going to look after the kids if all the women are off to war? Are we supposed to strap the nursing babies to our chests and try not to hit the baby’s head with the gun?
/r/MensRights23/03/22 03:10 AM
1

Yeah no, women aren’t the ones in power. The current government made the rule about no men leaving and it is made up of men.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:32 AM
1

There should be no draft for anyone. Feminists have protested war and violence since the 60’s.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:15 AM
1

Canada will never be under attack. It’s one of the most profound privileges of being Canadian. That’s why Ukrainians want to come here now, as the Syrians did. Do you not understand that these men who die in war are loved by women? Wives mothers sisters. There is no draft and no war in Canada. There will never be either.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:13 AM
1

No one should be conscripted. No one is in my country.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:08 AM
1

The link you provided explains that conscription for women is likely to exacerbate already existing gaps between men and women. Additionally, it says that feminism is about peace and non-violence, so more conscription is the opposite of that. In the US, feminists oppose selective service for everyone. In Canada there is no draft of any kind. For anyone. This is a non issue.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:07 AM
1

Uh no it was not an election issue or on any ballot.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:03 AM
1

And what did those organizations say exactly in protest? Can you quote them?
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:02 AM
1

When did women have the chance to vote for or against it? Remind me?
/r/MensRights22/03/22 11:24 PM
1

So incoherent. You admit that women get hurt and killed by men more than the reverse, but then ask us to ignore it or look the other way.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 09:22 PM
1

The reason we make a big deal out of women getting abused and beaten is because yes, severe injuries and deaths are treated more seriously than “emotional abuse” because they are clear and not subject to interpretation. Physical evidence is physical evidence. Crime data is crime data. And it shows clearly that if you are a woman, you are much much much more likely to die at the hands of your partner or suffer a severe physical injury as a result of DV. You cannot “just as easily say” who commits…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 08:10 PM
1

Yes men do the vast majority of the killing. Other men and boys are often victims of toxic masculinity. As far as domestic violence goes, which gender would you guess has the most severe injuries? Which gender is killed by their partner more?
/r/MensRights22/03/22 08:02 PM
-1

Ok buddy. Whatever you need to feel like your failures in life aren’t your fault.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 08:01 PM
1

This is a post about how you don’t or don’t “really” think the medical community gaslights or underserved women. Can you read? Behaving in what way? Not beating them or killing them? That’s what we mean by toxic masculinity. The kind of idea that violence is a good way to express power. Men have the vast majority of the wealth and power. That’s how patriarchy benefits them mainly.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 07:57 PM
-2

No one thinks women are more valuable. They think women are weaker and more innocent, which isn’t the same thing and doesn’t actually serve women. Are you under the impression that the labour movement for example wasn’t a male movement?
/r/MensRights22/03/22 07:48 PM
0

Ugh. Can you lead to any MRA outlet that has supported any known female issue? And YOU KNOW feminists constantly talk about how patriarchal constructions of masculinity limit and hurt men.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 07:19 PM
-4

Can you lead to any MRA outlet that has supported any known female issue? Feminists are CONSTANTLY talking about how patriarchal constructions of masculinity limit and hurt men.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 07:17 PM
1

My husband is a partner at a big five firm. He is not aggressive or domineering. He does however, treat women with respect and has literally fired men for mistreating women. No one wants to marry you. I wouldn’t worry about “avoiding marriage”. The court cannot “supersede” the DNA test. “Fatherly role” means step parent from birth or near to that. Again, no one wants your genes so this isn’t something you have to worry about. Big corporations are all about diversity, inclusion, anti-bullying. Th…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 06:40 PM
-1

Yeah right. Sure.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 06:31 PM
-3

You said they laugh at men dying. Show me where that’s true.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 05:21 PM
1

Why would I care whether you “like” being on “my side” whatever that means? I’m not interested in your tone policing.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 05:20 PM
1

Fathers do not have the “choice” to be pregnant. That’s what the difference in reproduction is. As far as being stronger, very few jobs require physical strength. The vast majority of well paying jobs have nothing to do with physical strength at all. All of the so called “benefits” you list apply to men and fathers too. Non biological fathers are not “routinely” asked to pay child support because DNA tests exist. “Aggressiveness” is generally discouraged in modern workplaces. It’s certainly not …
/r/MensRights22/03/22 05:00 PM
-4

In your bizarre hate filled fantasies, yes. In reality not at all.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 03:57 PM
-1

Uh yeah, they were allowed to choose their spouses and leave the house without a chaperone.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 02:17 PM
1

You think men don’t have an in group bias???? What does “bros before hoes” mean then? LOL
/r/MensRights22/03/22 02:02 PM
0

Oh did they have a chance to vote on this issue? Was the draft on the ballot? I must have missed that.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 01:58 PM
-8

citation needed
/r/MensRights22/03/22 01:56 PM
1

Motherhood is not the “easier” option. That’s ridiculous. I have three kids including twins, and it was not easy at all in any way. In addition to the work, you have men like you ready to tell you how worthless and pathetic what you do is, and assume you’re an idiot for choosing to have kids. Women have “better access to birth control” BECAUSE THEY DO THE PREGNANCIES. You guys leave that out constantly. Staying at home is not a “luxury”. For me, working would have actually cost me money because …
/r/MensRights22/03/22 01:54 PM
1

Statistically I am correct. I am trying to dissuade this sub from making erroneous claims that lead to hate. Incels who have done mass murders have been known to frequent this sub. This is well documented. The kind of hate this sub propagates is among the most dangerous, because it pretends to be based in fact. I have a history with confronting misogyny in real life and online. Although this “movement” is disorganized and incoherent, it has managed to produce real violence. It has to be challeng…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 01:50 PM
0

You’re here that is in itself evidence.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 08:14 PM
1

You have PLENTY of thing to say about men that are positive on this sub. You can’t do it because you hate women.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:53 PM
0

You’re such a transparent loser. The majority of women identify as feminist anyway. Can’t do it eh? Because you hate women!
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:48 PM
0

Women take care of families, they have babies. They are punished economically and socially for this. We are making progress despite you. Women are earning more every day. Occupying more power roles everyday. In Canada we just got $10 a day childcare. The sky is the limit. If men have the advantage what’s your excuse? You making six figures yet? Why not?
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:47 PM
0

Name five things you love about women.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:45 PM
0

You are clearly determined to live a life of misery and blame women for it. Have fun!
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:38 PM
0

You need to consult with a lawyer. Things are decided on a case by case basis not according to a base law. If you live in a large state you can request she not move more than an hour away. They’re your children too and the courts know that. Unless your kids would go to daycare instead of their moms during the day the stay at home thing means nothing. You’re living in dystopian fiction. Call a lawyer and don’t stop calling until you find one that will help you get your kids. Stop being a worm.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:24 PM
0

You’re so stupid. Your sexism bullshit gets in the way of you running your life. If she really is abusive and whatever this shouldn’t be difficult to prove in court. Then you should be awarded full or half custody. There’s absolutely no reason you shouldn’t get half custody. It’s a bullshit myth that men don’t get it because the courts “prefer women”, men don’t ask for it. Ask for it. Explain the abuse thing, if it’s actually real. I’m betting it isn’t. The court won’t allow her to move too far …
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:14 PM
1

Again, how does owning the wealth not confer a distinct advantage? Do you think Melania has the same control over the Trump empire that Donald does? Most women do not marry for money. Most women are not rich, but they still, on average, have less money than men.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:03 PM
2

Good question! There’s nothing wrong with women, so what could it be?
/r/MensRights21/03/22 05:50 PM
-1

Oh yeah no, this is so much better for them. It’s so great for kids to grow up in a home where mom and dad hate each other. Emotionally nutritious! I bet a million bucks you’ve never even spoken to a good lawyer about this. BTW no bad marriage is ever the one spouses fault. You are immature and you sound like a bully. I wonder what your children really think of you.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 05:50 PM
3

No women own much much much less than half of the wealth. This is fact. This is true at all income levels. The average statistical woman has less money than the average man.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 05:30 PM
-2

Wow. You’re married to someone you don’t value. That’s super messed up. Why would you do that? Why are you modelling such a horrific relationship for your children?
/r/MensRights21/03/22 05:19 PM
-1

In this case, she literally owns half the home. I’m talking about your absurd notion that women spending men’s money is the same as owning it. You must be super fun to be married to. Is it your belief that your wife is some kind of house cat who contributes nothing to your household? Does she know how little you value her?
/r/MensRights21/03/22 05:09 PM
1

Explain how ownership confers no distinct advantage.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 05:04 PM
0

The average man has more money and power than the average women. This is statistical fact.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 04:53 PM
0

Yeah there’s no difference between them at all. I wonder why men own all the wealth and occupy all the leadership and power roles?
/r/MensRights21/03/22 04:49 PM
1

Oh sure. So you couldn’t write a list of things that are exemplary about men? So convincing!
/r/MensRights21/03/22 04:42 PM
1

Can you list five things you love about women?
/r/MensRights21/03/22 04:38 PM
0

I ask my husband and son to do things all the time. They both ask me to do things all the time. That’s what happens in a loving family. Why is it so hard for you to list five things you love about women? Is it because you hate them and can’t think of any?
/r/MensRights21/03/22 03:53 PM
0

So, you can’t do it. Big surprise.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 03:51 PM
-3

Big surprise, silence. LOL
/r/MensRights21/03/22 03:43 PM
1

Thanks bro!
/r/MensRights21/03/22 03:42 PM
-6

I love men. I’ve been married to one for twenty years. Feminists hate sexism, not men. Let’s do an experiment: you reply with five things you love about women, and then I’ll do men. Ten bucks says you won’t be able to do it, because you hate women.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 03:23 PM
-17

Accountability how? What I said was fact.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 03:08 PM
3

You didn’t went eh? Maybe you should have stayed a bit longer.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:45 PM
-20

No one reads the scum manifesto. It’s an interesting book but it’s not the feminist Bible. The woman was nuts. Everybody knows that.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:43 PM
-15

No one “loses all their property” in divorce. It’s divided equally. Also, why do you assume the woman didn’t contribute to the acquisition is said property?
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:42 PM
1

Oh my god man why do you think you have to hide who you are? Because most women are feminists!
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:59 AM
1

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/07/61-of-u-s-women-say-feminist-describes-them-well-many-see-feminism-as-empowering-polarizing/
/r/MensRights20/03/22 10:51 PM
1

60% of women are feminists. You just use feminism as a euphemism for women. I’ve also seen “Western women” used. It’s a charade.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 10:35 PM
1

Yeah, you said it was a target of 50%, then said you wouldn’t give specifics even though you already had. So you’re saying you wouldn’t mind if your work knew about how much you hate women and that you hang out here?
/r/MensRights20/03/22 10:30 PM
1

You already said it was 50%. You’re not fooling anyone. Are you super right wing generally or do you just hate women?
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:47 PM
1

I never asked you for the name of your company. And again, thank you for admitting your views are super gross and ignorant, so much so that if work finds out who you really are and what you really think, you’d be fired.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:44 PM
1

That’s absurd. I write sales proposals and we are often asked to provide details on our diversity and inclusion policies and programs. Talking about an approach to diversity your company is taking is perfectly reasonable. Nobody publishes their polices directly, and sharing those would be a very fireable offence but I’m not asking that of you. That’s not what this is about. This is about being caught on a men’s rights forum.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:36 PM
1

Why can’t you be seen here then?
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:29 PM
1

Interesting. So you admit your views are so distasteful and dangerous they could get you fired. Gross.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:26 PM
1

In Canada often it means having bilingual resources, it means having accessible workplaces, pumping rooms, it means looking at blind resumes, not negotiating salaries so women can’t underbid themselves, making it really clear that racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia are not tolerated in any way, it means accommodating people with children and family responsibilities, it means paid parental leave, it means your on-boarding program makes all these things clear and provides anti-racism and acce…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:19 PM
1

What does that mean? What does Google do to offend you, broflake? You said affirmative action as alive and well and running rampant over the lives of men, so you have to prove it.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:15 PM
1

I know a guy. Please. This is not convincing.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:13 PM
-2

And risk their lives.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 08:47 PM
1

No it does not. Diversity and Inclusion is about removing barriers to building a diverse workforce. Affirmative action is different and is not really practiced anymore.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 08:14 PM
1

Show me where exactly it says that.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 08:06 PM
1

That sounds made up. Prove it.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 08:06 PM
0

Show me where it’s still used. Show me a workplace that still does it.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 04:45 PM
2

What sin?
/r/MensRights20/03/22 04:44 PM
0

Affirmative action isn’t even in place in many workplaces anymore. It’s not a thing. Yet you’ve fantasized that it “will remain long after” gender parity. That’s so ridiculous.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 01:19 AM
1

That’s fantasy. Nice to see you aren’t interested in helping anything or improving anything.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 07:40 PM
1

Why are universities responsible for men not choosing to go? Is STEM responsible for women not being in STEM?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 07:19 PM
1

“There’s nothing to see here”? Who exactly is saying that? At the elementary school level, there are interventions in place to both include more boys and encourage girls’ interest in STEM. Are they both wrong ideas? Who has ever claimed “female superiority”?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 04:51 PM
1

Yes universities are female dominated. A university is a school.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 04:20 PM
1

My point stands. Why should universities change to attract more men if STEM shouldn’t change for women?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 04:02 PM
1

Who invented it? God?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 04:10 AM
1

This is a picture I like to use when people ask this question. https://images.app.goo.gl/Xr4nLDhQEDBqtQLj6
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:36 AM
1

Yeah I saw that, it was in the context of how you think feminism is horrible now and owes some debt to men it’s not paying. So now you’re anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:34 AM
0

Feminism is about achieving gender equality and fighting sexism and dismantling patriarchal cultural structures. I already know what you think it is. That’s why you’re here.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:31 AM
1

What fucking questions? You haven’t asked me anything. No, I don’t think the focus of feminism should be men. Does that answer your question?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:27 AM
1

Anyways it’s clear from your other comments that you’re an anti-feminist. You’re not fooling anyone.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:22 AM
1

So you can’t answer, you’re too scared. Boring.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:21 AM
1

Oooh we’re getting close! Tell me the difference between equality and equity.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:16 AM
1

You mean like gender equality? Why choose a men’s rights forum?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:12 AM
0

That’s not what he thinks. LOL
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:08 AM
1

What politics? I said misogyny, I was specific. Why can’t you be?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:08 AM
0

I did carry nurse and stay home with our three kids for eight years. Including fucking twins. Often he was away for work for weeks at a time when they were very small. I am a dedicated partner who emotionally supports and adores him everyday. I make sure he is healthy. I get him through hard times. I am - in his words - a sex goddess. I work full time as well, I’m a proposal writer. I have moved our entire house several times to different countries for his job. I do all the finances and mortgage…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:04 AM
0

Uh yeah all the “investments” and shit will be split, again fucking you both. The assets get split half. As long as they were earned within the marriage.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:58 AM
1

I said HUSBAND YO. All of that is totally true. You’re too chickenshit to even admit why you’re here. Are you afraid work might find it?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:57 AM
1

He sort of glowed in the classroom in post-colonial literature tutorial. He claimed to forget his textbook and I shared with him. He was an exquisite poet at the time, he made concrete poems and did visual art, his work was displayed in galleries. He knew about language. He had an impeccable personal smoothness, a way of being in the world that made people feel good, be persuaded, understand something they hadn’t. I want to write about the sex but I won’t, but I will say that one of the ways you…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:54 AM
0

No you are never awarded “50% of the money he earned in the marriage” that money has already been spent. That makes no sense. They have to sell the house and split the proceeds which financially sucks more than owning the house and having all the equity in one place. It’s a hit for both of you. Alimony is extremely rare where I live. It’s not really a thing anymore.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:33 AM
0

“Bring”. That’s hilarious. I work and we have three kids, but by true love I mean we are best friends. I support him through everything. I built our life with him, just as he did. He is also deeply in love with me.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:31 AM
1

I am a woman. I come here to push back against misogyny. It’s a hobby of mine. Why are you here? How do you relate to the content here? Be specific.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:29 AM
-1

Incentive? That’s super weird. I don’t really consider child support to be an incentive. Women don’t get divorced for child support. The couple splits the stuff so there’s no real advantage there either. If the man has money there’s more of an incentive to stay and have access to it, if it’s about money.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:25 AM
-2

You want to die never having experienced one of the most profound human experiences there is? Your choice!
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:16 AM
-11

The possibility of heartbreak is not a good reason to avoid love.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:13 AM
-1

I’m asking questions. So do you feel that way in your own marriage? That she could leave you any second?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:12 AM
-12

The contract is a symbol. For us it was important. It wasn’t important to you? It’s important to many gay couples. How has love changed? Love has been the same for thousands of years, that’s why people relate to 1000 year old love poetry. I don’t tell my kids anything about whether or not to marry, but I’m constantly teaching them how to love and be loved. If that becomes marriage for them that’s great.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:11 AM
-12

LOL. You just don’t get it! That’s super sad. Read some more books.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:07 AM
1

There’s no way your reasoning operates properly if you are sincerely participating in a men’s rights forum. You must be at the beginning of the redpill process. What lured you here? What event made you think “yes, despite owning the vast majority of the wealth and occupying the vast majority of leadership and power roles in every sector and at every level, men’s rights are under threat”? What is it that makes you think you were ever “left” if you don’t have compassion for women? If the people at…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:06 AM
1

Does your girlfriend know you hang out in men’s rights forums?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:00 AM
1

Aw, does Mr. German have no life he is proud of? How predictable. LOL
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:55 AM
-12

I have been in deep love with my husband for more than 20 years. True love is entirely real. I know because I live it.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:53 AM
1

I have never and would never say anything racist. This is clear in the post. I’m happy to tell you all about my life: I am South Asian (Punjabi), Black (African American) and British by ethnicity. I am yes, Canadian. 4th generation. I have been married for 20 years to a very high quality human being with whom I am in the most exquisite love. We have three kids, 14, 14, and 18. I work as a proposal writer for a large security services company. I have three degrees (B.A and M.A in English, as well…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:52 AM
-24

Why don’t you count love as a reward? Do you not think true love exists?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:46 AM
-14

You are happily married but wouldn’t advise marriage? How does that work?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:44 AM
1

You claim your 25% American indigenous counts for a whole lot though don’t you?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:40 AM
1

I’m tri racial myself but I think it’s interesting you’re taking such pains not to admit you’re American.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:38 AM
1

So you’re indigenous German? Hahahahahahahahaha
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:16 AM
1

I never said anything even remotely racist so that’s a joke. You lied and wouldn’t admit you are American because then you got to avoid addressing my point about America being way way way worse to Indigenous people. Now you won’t even admit to being anti-feminist or redpill. Let me ask you this: do you talk to your work people about your presence on this forum? LOL
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:00 AM
1

“Per se” LOL. Can’t even admit it. What a joke.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 12:53 AM
1

LOL. This is hilarious. So then, do you personally have a job? Or are you typical of this sub? I don’t care who you individually are. I don’t care what your ethnicity is. Anyone who is anti-feminist or “redpill” is trash. That’s why if you do have a job, you can’t tell anyone you believe any of this shit.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 12:35 AM
1

Uh no, I was dismissing someone for trying to tell me about how much my country sucked. And almost everyone on this sub is unemployed and I make fun of many of you regularly for it. Nothing in that post indicates I connected unemployment and Indigenous identity. The guy I was talking to did not ever identify as Indigenous.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 12:11 AM
1

So men aren’t interested. Why is it educations responsibility to change to get men interested but STEM shouldn’t change to make women more interested?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 12:09 AM
1

You don’t know me, maybe I did go. Then right after that: ok I didn’t go but it wasn’t my fault. Grow up.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 12:05 AM
1

What the fuck are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 12:04 AM
1

Um I had no idea what your ethnicity is bro. Nice try!
/r/MensRights19/03/22 12:00 AM
2

Anecdotes do not “add up”. They are very poor evidence. You didn’t go to college because you chose not to work hard.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:54 PM
1

What’s actually stopping boys from doing well and going to university? Only a small percentage have behaviour problems. I take issue with the idea that boys are being “mistreated” in schools. Just like your claim that accommodations for boys don’t count because they aren’t in all schools, I claim this “mistreatment” only exists in a minority of schools. What if men aren’t going to college because they just aren’t interested? Whose fault is that?
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:49 PM
-1

What question?
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:44 PM
-4

Why don’t you apply that reasoning to school? Boys aren’t interested in school. It can’t be helped. Boys aren’t doing well in school because they aren’t interested.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:40 PM
2

Teachers are already being taught to implement strategies designed to do a better job of including boys. When I went to teachers college in 2016 they did. Should we change STEM to better include women as well?
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:33 PM
2

Can you be more specific?
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:22 PM
3

LOL
/r/MensRights18/03/22 09:48 PM
-5

What is the nature of the education bias? Isn’t this the same thing as when you blame women for not getting into STEM?
/r/MensRights18/03/22 09:21 PM
1

Not in a male dominated workplace.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 06:01 PM
0

Affirmative action doesn’t do that. It says if two candidates are EQUAL, you hire the diverse one.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 05:16 PM
0

I addressed number three. You failed to respond. In Canada we fought hard to change rape to sexual assault. I notice no Israeli links.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 05:15 PM
2

In the real world, adults make this decision as a couple.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 04:26 PM
1

What equal custody laws are those exactly? If I remember correctly, they were arguing against equal custody in every case without deliberation, not against equal custody in any case. Please quote these Indian and Israeli laws.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 03:35 PM
-4

LOL. Getting pregnant is a mutual decision most of the time bro.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 03:33 PM
1

EXACTLY
/r/MensRights18/03/22 03:32 PM
0

Uh didn’t a woman give birth to you?
/r/MensRights18/03/22 03:27 PM
1

There’s no conscription in Canada.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 03:26 PM
-1

I said HOW does it disadvantage men. You seem unable to answer this question.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 03:16 PM
1

This is totally incoherent. It doesn’t even address my point. Women were not responsible for their crimes for example in the 18th century because if they were married, they were their husbands property. They were not considered fully responsible adults in their own right.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 12:03 PM
1

Lie. Does the US mandate Indigenous content in all public schools for example? Where is the US equivalent of Truth and Reconciliation? Where is their Indigenous television network?
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:27 AM
1

How exactly do those disadvantage men?
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:24 AM
1

LOL ok bud. Real convincing.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:24 AM
-3

Sorry show me where this document is unfair? What’s your problem with it?
/r/MensRights18/03/22 02:32 AM
-1

Read the articles. They frequented incel forums and/or identified as incels.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 01:27 AM
-4

Where is this enshrined in the law? Show me.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 12:53 AM
1

I live in Canada so no!
/r/MensRights18/03/22 12:52 AM
0

By “life choices” you mean “human reproduction” which is not an optional thing for most human beings, nor could it be.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 12:10 AM
1

It refers more to the wealth and earnings gap in general, which is factually indisputable.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 12:08 AM
1

This is totally untrue. Citation needed.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 12:06 AM
-5

Disadvantage men how? Be specific.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 11:45 PM
-8

No. It means if you do a mass murder, they’ll charge you with terrorism if you were prompted by your redpill “beliefs”.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 11:43 PM
0

Are you American? How are Indigenous people doing there? LOL Do you even have a job? Hahahahahahahahahahah
/r/MensRights17/03/22 09:21 PM
1

There is no draft in Canada. Apparently we are the only sane country in the world? I guess I’m not that surprised. Is it ok for women to vote here? LOL
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:59 PM
1

You keep going back and forth. This post is totally incoherent. You talk yourself into the reality that overall, as a gender, including your beloved homeless population, men have FAR FAR more wealth and power. And I mean including average wealth and average power. You seem to understand that. Then, you try and blame women for it, like they choose to be poor and powerless. Then, you acknowledge sexism holds women back from both but then return to blaming women for it. As a feminist, my concern is…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:55 PM
-11

Incels have done 13 mass murders so far. That’s who they’re talking about.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:07 PM
1

If you said “men have all the wealth and power compared to women” to the average homeless man he would agree with you, because it’s largely true. There is no getting away with the fact that men own the vast majority of the wealth and occupy far more leadership and power roles than women. This is a fact. I am not just speaking of very rich men. Statistically, the average man has more money and power than the average women. This is true for medium amounts of money and average management roles. Acr…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:06 PM
1

Taken together AS A GENDER men have most of the money and power. This is true at all income levels and across all organizations.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:38 PM
-2

Equality
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:32 PM
0

The original post literally says “men don’t owe you success”, blaming women for that pressure.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:31 PM
-4

So do women firefighters just stop being feminist when there is a fire? This is absurd.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:49 PM
-7

Do women own half the money and occupy half the power and leadership roles in every organization in the Philippines?
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:47 PM
1

Sure you do. You just admitted you don’t like “fat bitches” and they all must be “bitter”. So, can women say that career failures like yourself must be jealous of men who have big successful careers at like big 5 firms? LOL. Don’t be a bitter cat, just work harder!
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:44 PM
-2

We do not. That’s made up.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 11:43 AM
0

You literally just complained about women not being thin enough.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 11:41 AM
1

I live in Canada.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 11:12 AM
-7

So like, you don’t think people fall in love with each other as human beings and get married and start families for that reason? Also only Americans have the selective service thing, in sane countries there is no draft at all. The draft itself is the problem, not that women aren’t eligible. Google “feminism” and “selective service” and you’ll see that feminists oppose it, oppose war, and oppose all forms of conscription. People are very rarely called to the selective service even when they regis…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 03:33 AM
-4

Did you get drafted? When?
/r/MensRights17/03/22 01:31 AM
-7

“All”? You guys only ever talk about the military. Are there others?
/r/MensRights17/03/22 01:31 AM
1

What does that even mean? He’s a SUPERHERO.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:04 PM
1

Rape of married women was a violent act. It was not against the law no matter how brutal it was. Please list cases of women violently raping their husbands.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 11:24 PM
0

Literally you contradict yourself in your own post. You won’t answer me, but dude you admit women were not responsible for their own crimes - THIS IS BECAUSE THEY WERE CONSIDERED PROPERTY AND NOT FULLY RESPONSIBLE ADULTS. Your whole post is cherry picking bullshit. You used like three quotes of people saying beating women is bad to somehow prove it wasn’t happening without consequence, when of course you can find many abolitionist quotes from the same era when slavery was oppressing millions. Gr…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 09:49 PM
1

What does that mean? I don’t post about things I’m not concerned about.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 09:41 PM
1

Ha ha ok lonely boy, I wasn’t asking for names. LOL
/r/MensRights14/03/22 07:16 PM
0

LOL. Yeah, you seem super fulfilled.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 06:40 PM
1

I have an incredible life, filled with true love and good kids and an amazing husband, as well as a great job. You live with your mother.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 06:22 PM
0

Men as a class have all the money and power. They are the most powerful, not the powerless.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 06:21 PM
1

It seems to work itself out in mens favour, because women are not allowed to have children and have careers, which makes no sense to us. Even if you include all the poorest of men, overall men have way more money and way more power to fix all those problems than women.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 06:08 PM
1

Yeah bro. Pretty sure they said the same to slaves who were trying to abolish slavery. Forgive me if I say I will never willingly accept my own oppression. Go help your mother with something.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 06:06 PM
0

What? So what about the unmarried women? They don’t exist? Only about 30% of women get child support and it’s a way smaller percentage that get alimony. Again, men own virtually all the wealth and occupy virtually all the leadership and power roles. What more do you want??
/r/MensRights14/03/22 06:01 PM
1

You know exactly what I meant. There are hundreds of serial killers who hated women and killed dozens and mutilated and raped them and all of it. Their aim was to kill as many women as they could. There is no female equivalent and there never will be. All you’ve got to complain about is some frustrated teen Twitter slogan.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:59 PM
1

They usually just do it. It doesn’t need to be said.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:55 PM
1

What are you talking about? Do women get free food and rent?
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:54 PM
1

Do you still live at home?
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:53 PM
1

Murders are done via gun all over the world. There is no evidence that “stronger” men do the violent crime. Please provide it. Serial killers are not stronger than average men. Physical strength does not predict violence and murder.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:53 PM
1

But it’s cool when you do it???
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:45 PM
1

Please explain how ownership of money does not confer a distinct advantage.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:44 PM
1

This makes no sense because: A bigger or taller or whatever man is not more likely to do violence or murders because of his size Guns do not require physical strength. Most murders are done with guns. If the majority of violence and murder is done by men, we can go ahead and ascribe that to the male gender, especially when such a small percentage of women act this way.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:42 PM
1

But you can call women “spiteful and vindictive”? You can blame mothers for society’s ills? You can take like the literal two or three relationships you’ve ever had with women and decide all women are bad? LOL
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:34 PM
1

They have all the wealth and power. I don’t understand what more you want. We are saying we don’t accept that women “choose” to be poor and powerless. We are saying we want our share. We are saying we don’t want to be punished for participating in reproduction. If you have everything already why do you have such a problem with us trying to achieve economic and leadership/power equality?
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:22 PM
1

We are talking about the gender of perpetrators. Violent crime is vast majority male. Murder is vast majority male.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:13 PM
1

Call me when you find a woman who serially kills men and then inserts her body parts into the skulls of the men for sexual gratification.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:11 PM
1

This is hilarious. Mothers killing children is VERY rare. Women being violent and killing ANYONE is rare. Men do the vast majority of all violent crime and all murders. There’s no getting around it.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:10 PM
2

Where have feminists said they want to legalize rape???
/r/MensRights14/03/22 04:50 PM
1

Tell me, who are they? Who lives with you? Who loves you darling?
/r/MensRights14/03/22 04:47 PM
1

Hahahaha. Is that why you are surrounded by people who love and adore you? LOOOOOL
/r/MensRights14/03/22 03:35 PM
1

You’re right. Women (including me) owe you exactly as much as you owe them.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 03:29 PM
1

LOL. Is this the way you approach all your relationships with women? They owe you but you don’t owe them? Have you ever been in love? Do you even know what love is?
/r/MensRights14/03/22 03:24 PM
1

What does that even mean?
/r/MensRights14/03/22 03:21 PM
0

So women weren’t oppressed throughout history? Even when they were legally defined as property???
/r/MensRights14/03/22 01:56 PM
2

Have you seen the latest Spider-Man movie? Spider-Man is shorter than his girlfriend.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 01:55 PM
0

No honey this math is wrong. If 13% of employees are management, only ten percent of THOSE are women. That means 1.3%.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 01:54 PM
1

Please show evidence that women do not participate in a “third” of the labour market. Then explain why you haven’t taken a job in those sectors.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 01:52 PM
1

This is untrue. If it were true women would own the vast majority of the wealth and occupy most of the leadership and power roles in society. They do not.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 01:41 PM
0

So…you can shame with the cat thing, but I can’t? How does that work? If you really believed shittyness is gender neutral you wouldn’t be here.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 01:31 PM
0

Bro I’ve been married for 20 years to a fabulous man. This cat thing is a made up fantasy. You are alone. You’ve always been alone. You’ll always be alone. With nothing. If you do have a job it’s because they don’t know how much you hate women. Good luck with your hiding.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 01:05 PM
-1

Wow yeah, I can see why your “movement” is so popular and has achieved so many of its goals.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 12:28 PM
0

Then why do women still take their husbands names? Where did that come from?
/r/MensRights14/03/22 11:27 AM
1

So which is it? Women should be forced to serve or should be excluded?
/r/MensRights14/03/22 11:26 AM
1

Women do not abuse/kill children more than men kill and abuse adults. It’s not even close to equal. Nice try.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 11:25 AM
0

As a heart attack. What does “usurp” mean? Like do you really think we plan to kill male leaders and establish a matriarchal fascism of some kind? loooooooooool
/r/MensRights14/03/22 02:33 AM
1

You don’t need strength to fire a gun, do you? And yet.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 01:14 AM
-1

LOL ok bro. Feminism is about gender equity. You guys are obsessed with feminism and women way more that feminists have even been about men or “men’s rights”.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 11:35 PM
1

So now you’re changing your stance with a little questioning? It’s likely you’re just making stuff up to make reality fit your assumptions.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 11:30 PM
1

When did the “switch” happen? How could you tell? What year was it?
/r/MensRights13/03/22 10:26 PM
1

Alimony is gender neutral. It’s based on income. The text you quote is deliberately written so it would apply to whoever has more money, man or woman. The reason it exists is because women stay home with children often for many years and have no credit or income when their husbands leave them. In those cases, the higher earning spouse has to support the low earning one until things change. Note that the word “poverty” is deliberately used here, it would be applicable in situations where the man …
/r/MensRights13/03/22 09:53 PM
-3

That’s because women don’t murder nearly as much as men. That’s a fact.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 09:44 PM
1

So I guess I owe men as much as you owe women.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 09:42 PM
1

Alimony and child support are totally different things. So you still twisted the truth to fit some absurd narrative.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 09:42 PM
-3

If they’re not dying early from anything but their own actions, why are you bringing it up as a gender oppression issue?
/r/MensRights13/03/22 07:10 PM
2

Provide the evidence in Turkish.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 07:08 PM
2

Why can’t you provide any evidence for this absurd claim? Because it’s pretend. I have to assume that MRA issues are at least questionable. Everything you say at least is not worthy of consideration. Hate speech causes violence. In Canada it is a crime. We are not without freedom as a result. There’s no place for hate anywhere.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 05:45 PM
2

No it’s not based on the identity of the victim, it’s based on the motivation for the crime. Hate should be criminalized. Most murders of women are not considered hate crimes just because the victims were women. You’re fully lying. There was never anything like “permanent child support” ever. Why do you think you can just make up stuff like that? Don’t you realize it makes it clear that just about all MRA issues are made up?
/r/MensRights13/03/22 05:37 PM
1

Please show evidence that child support extends beyond the child’s arrival into adulthood. You won’t be able to because this is a made up fantasy. Hate crimes are designed to criminalize violent discrimination. Why would you be opposed to that? If someone was killed because of their skin colour or sexual orientation, why wouldn’t we recognize that as a particular type of crime?
/r/MensRights13/03/22 05:23 PM
1

So discrimination should be ok? What? What countries pay child support after the child is an adult? Citation needed.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 05:18 PM
1

You have to name any “extra rights” feminists are arguing for. Feminists do not advocate for prosecution of rapists without due process. Ever. Again, feminists are universally anti-war. They do advocate for women’s full participation in the military which is complex. Women were only allowed access to all positions in the Canadian military in 1989, for example. Feminists took a position on that but if you ask any feminist, they will tell you they were absolutely opposed to the Iraqi and Ukrainian…
/r/MensRights13/03/22 04:41 PM
1

Are you under the impression that every female victim of DV gets “resources”? And what are you doing about the situation?
/r/MensRights13/03/22 04:27 PM
-15

Men don’t die early because of feminism. Or women. They don’t know why they die earlier. I have read that women who have children live longer, the more children the longer the life. But men’s general life span has NOTHING to do with women or feminism. This is like asking why MRA’s aren’t advocating for A cure for uterine fibroids.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 04:26 PM
1

Anti-discrimination rights are due to everyone. There is nothing supremacist about that. The rape thing: women are asking not to be dismissed outright, not eliminate investigations and proper prosecutions. The problem is cops being unwilling to investigate and prosecute if necessary. No feminist is arguing women shouldn’t have to do compulsory service. In Israel for example women and men both have to serve. Many feminists argue for doing away with compulsory service altogether. Since the 1960’s …
/r/MensRights13/03/22 04:24 PM
1

What extra rights are these?
/r/MensRights13/03/22 04:12 PM
0

No it isn’t. Nowhere has feminism ever advocated for female supremacy. This is a made up fantasy.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 04:10 PM
-3

Yeah, let’s all say the N word.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 03:46 PM
0

This is not true. Those kinds of jobs represent a small segment of the labour market.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 03:45 PM
-2

That’s ridiculous. Women had to fight to be able to participate in the military. They still occupy a small percentage of leadership roles relative to their participation overall.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 03:44 PM
0

But you equivocate feminist with “supremacy”.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 03:43 PM
5

10 years ago. What exactly happened that feminism has drastically changed over just 10 years?
/r/MensRights13/03/22 03:42 PM
-2

Why would you have a problem with that?
/r/MensRights13/03/22 03:41 PM
-2

Because you are anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 03:41 PM
-13

How are feminists “accepting” that men live shorter lives than women? How is that women’s fault or feminisms fault?
/r/MensRights13/03/22 03:41 PM
1

And so how do you reconcile those two numbers? Mine are in the first paragraph of the document.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 04:19 PM
0

Putting a newborn into daycare is not good for the baby. Nannies are expensive and they would have to split the cost of that. Breastfeeding is really good for babies. She would not be able to nurse if she works.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:29 PM
1

1 in four women, 1 in 9 men.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 12:14 PM
1

https://ncadv.org/STATISTICS
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:00 AM
1

There is no evidence aside from made up bullshit that men get beaten by there partners more. Crime data is crime data. Who gets murdered by their domestic partner more?
/r/MensRights10/03/22 08:45 PM
0

If you have to heavily edit your evidence to make your point, it’s probably not a valid point. There is no evidence that anyone follows “the Duluth model”. This is an opinion. It makes no sense. Fact: women are generally not as physically strong as men, so domestic violence is more threatening to them. That’s why there are many more women who are killed by their partners than men killed by women.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 07:07 PM
0

The editing makes it appear unfair, but it isn’t. It’s disingenuous to argue that the editing somehow makes no difference.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 12:49 PM
-16

This heavily edited and you know it. Everyone pointed this out immediately.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:03 PM
-5

So, how often would you say men kill their women partners compared to how often women kill their male partners?
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:00 PM
-1

You were trying to equalize teachers and principals by repeating that “both are leaders” in order to dispute my earlier point that men dominate leadership roles in all industries. This makes you ignorant.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 06:48 PM
1

So, yeah. You have to live in hiding. LOL
/r/MensRights09/03/22 05:40 PM
1

They are not “both leaders” this implies they are equal. This is similar to the “women control the wealth” argument. No one can seem to explain to me how ownership does not confer a distinct advantage.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 05:40 PM
1

Why would you point to yourself as an example of affordability when you know it’s not affordable now??? Please explain how there’s no power differential between a principal and a teacher.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 04:50 PM
1

Are you alone in the world? Do you have to hide your feelings about women at work? Why?
/r/MensRights09/03/22 04:09 PM
1

It’s ridiculous. But I like to step in every once in a while because these men like to live in an echo chamber. These “ideas” have to be challenged.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 03:51 PM
1

Oh my god. Anyone can be considered a “leader”. You are deliberately constructing reality to make your point. Please explain how there is no meaningful difference in power between a principal and a teacher. There will be no market correction, just like there wasn’t in Vancouver. As a property owner I’m sure you must be counting on that.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 03:50 PM
1

Have you seen Hamilton house prices now? What are people supposed to do now???? The leadership roles in high schools are still dominated by men. Teachers are not in this category. Vice Principals, Principals, and administrators are.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 02:22 PM
1

Where did you live? In Canada houses in cities are well over a million dollars. Not everyone lives rural. Not everyone lives in America. Men still dominate all office jobs. They occupy the vast majority of leadership positions.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 02:14 PM
1

They were not allowed.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 02:01 PM
1

Sigh. The numbers are in the link I presented. It’s an American study, but America has the largest military in the world. Women are raped and sexually assaulted often enough in the American military that it constitutes a significant barrier to entry and promotion.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:40 AM
1

Women were not allowed into the military until 1948 in America. In Canada, women were not allowed into all position until 1989. This means women have had significantly less time to cultivate the kind of military achievement that would warrant a statue. By showing you military rape happens a lot to women I was illustrating that there are still significant barriers to women fully participating. So, you are suggesting that women “chose” not to do military related things that would warrant memoriali…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:39 AM
1

There’s no comparing Hollywood and the military, that’s ridiculous. Why didn’t you join the military? Are your reasons better than the average woman’s?
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:09 AM
1

Also it is 36% that experience sexual assault. 1 in 4.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 11:34 PM
1

We were talking about the military. I don’t understand why it’s hard for you to accept that women get raped more than men do. This has been true for centuries. Women get raped in the military at much much higher rates than men. It may be a contributing factor in unequal recruitment rates among men and women.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 11:33 PM
1

This is not difficult to find, yet somehow it is difficult for you to accept. 36% for women, 4% of men. https://www.protectourdefenders.com/factsheet/
/r/MensRights08/03/22 10:49 PM
1

That’s absurd. Are we supposed to expect you to take a certain kind of job in order to address men’s rights? Why would someone take a job and design their lives to prove some political point? We’re talking about real life here. $100K is nothing. You can’t buy a house with that. Dirty jobs pay more than minimum wage jobs, but for most people INCLUDING YOU, it isn’t worth it.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:53 PM
0

Are you aware of the sexual assault rates for women in the military? Are you joining? Why not?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:50 PM
1

Why would you think women business owners are averse to this kind of “risk”. Anyway all it sounds like you’re saying is that you risk your job and livelihood if you make a mistake, and that’s true for everyone with a job including me. Doesn’t sound comparable to hunting mammoths.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:50 PM
1

Why don’t you go into that industry? A plumber does not get paid as much as a corporate person, or someone who owns their own business, I bet strippers working in good clubs make more. Women don’t become plumbers for THE EXACT same reasons YOU don’t. If you think these types of jobs are so amazing why don’t you apply to clean out sewer pipes?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:30 PM
2

You said they “aren’t coming in hordes to join the military” when in reality up until recently they were not allowed to join. They had no choice.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:25 PM
1

Like you did? Please, enlighten me as to the percentage of these jobs relative to the labour market as a whole. Compare the segment to say, office jobs.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:20 PM
1

While carrying their children on their back?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:09 PM
2

Most jobs are not in these industries. That’s why you don’t have one either.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:09 PM
1

So you can’t address any of her points at all?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:08 PM
1

What risks are you taking right now? Do you know how risky prostitution is?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:04 PM
3

They WERE NOT ALLOWED TO JOIN THE MILITARY.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:03 PM
3

Cooking, shopping, cleaning up are integral parts of the vetting process.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy28/02/22 05:55 PM
-1

This is like saying capitalism doesn’t exist because the Monopoly man is pretend. Capitalism exists, and it dictates cultural and social value in societies that are capitalist. Similarly, the cultural and social value of men and women is still largely patriarchal. I would again point to the ubiquitous name taking tradition as an example. The devil is pretend. We do not need it to understand human evil.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/22 10:42 PM
-1

The devil is a made up figure from Christianity. It is pretend fantasy. “Evil” is real. Patriarchy is a real set of ideas and cultural ideals that currently operate in many societies. It’s a social order that puts men above women. It’s not pretend.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/22 10:31 PM
-1

There is no “devil”. That’s what I said. D-E-V-I-L. There is no devil.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/22 10:22 PM
0

Cultural belief systems are real and tangible. The “devil” is not. One piece of evidence of patriarchy: women taking mens names when they get married.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/22 10:12 PM
11

I feel so much pain for this woman.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy27/02/22 03:33 PM
0

Women were literally not allowed to be leaders in any other capacity and were considered inferior even as Queens. Plenty of good female leaders exist today.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/22 03:32 PM
1

“Pesky leadership”? Like burning the Spanish Armada as Queen Elizabeth the first did?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 04:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter