TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GilTheARM Archive

View 2 posts and 115 comments by GilTheARM on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's a badly written regex.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 12:56 AM
5

Surprised they just didn't put one toilet in there and call it a restroom.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 10:26 PM
1

Lurker here. But, there is some really good advice in this thread. I might add : to me, painting is a part of meditation and separation.
/r/askMRP23/03/16 04:44 PM
2

The woman agreed then, as well. That point is moot. A cow's opinion. Moo.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:11 PM
2

Equality.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:10 PM
3

http://www.registercitizen.com/general-news/20081115/two-arrested-for-sex-assault-on-juvenile With this one, the woman stayed in jail until she was let go on time served (she was abandoned by the man and did not have bail) and the man took the alford plea and got no jail time or any real punishment.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 06:49 PM
2

Same here.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 03:46 PM
1

They should register for the draft if accepted in any roles. (Which means, they should register for the draft right now.) Equal rights come with equal responsibilities; the start of which, in this theater, is the draft.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 05:06 PM
-5

To be fair - this should be the action / result people get for not voting anyway. :p
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:13 PM
3

Newly hired Boston University needs to take remedial English classes.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:59 PM
3

If this were american - at the 12th employee she would have been "forced" to hire a male regardless of her dream. Because, in America, government dreams for you.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:27 PM
1

I've asked women, gay, and trans people why there is no "s" ( for straight ) in the whole LGBTQWERTYUIOP thing.... Ba FAR the most angry answers are from women who claim I have no right to be proud to be straight. The gay and trans ppl gave the nicest "you know, good point" answers.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 10:53 AM
2

Read the description at the end - says it could elevate to sexual if it doesn't stop, basically.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 10:32 PM
0

It's because the stupids here think I support the decision when all I did was simply define it. It's typical of this sub. No worries. Thank you for your reply.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 11:38 AM
-5

Spousal support is there to keep a "quality of life" active as best as reasonably possible.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:16 PM
4

Sorry to see you're getting down voted. You need up votes. Any campaign that promotes health is a good one - even if it represents a gender specific portion of the issue. Yeah. Sure, it could have been written as "effects x in n people" and not have gender in it but, what we don't know based on this pic is if the pic is in a women's magazine where you would assume it's going to be gender focused. Which is fine.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 01:28 AM
2

Lol. True that! :)
/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:28 AM
-1

You act like it should be 100% men, instead of statistically equal? Or maybe not depending on the statistics. And yes, article wise- the are speaking about a legit problem. I'm speaking, reply to, more of the reddit FUD here that goes "omg men are never assholes, wtf!? Fuck that pussy power." Being as dramatic in the opposite direction is just as troll. (Not saying you are/were for the record.)
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:34 AM
-3

They're leaving the children in the care of the person they felt would care the best. In this case, it was the mothers. I have personal experience where it's been non-mom as well.. Your black and white thoughts really scream anger and you need to look at it when calmer.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:56 PM
-4

Don't you dare imply I need to assign blame to my (late) wife due to the sociopathic nature of her ex-husband. You have no idea how she might have been trapped herself, by the man. You just lost me. Fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:10 PM
-5

I'm saying we should punish and process EQUALLY. That is all. We currently do not. But we cannot also forget about the reasons why, sometimes, we do not. The safety of the victims is tantamount. Inability to recognize that has made you come across as a bitter jaded troll and im sorry you feel this way. I wish I could give help to your situation, I do. But cloud your vision away from the real goal: equal treatment. Liars need to be punished. Abusers do as well. Pussy passes need to be ignored. Th…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:53 PM
1

Also, thank you for saying you are glad the kids are safe. Internet points aside, it's nice to hear. :)
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:19 PM
-5

Please note - in my original replies I NEVER ONCE MENTIONED SEX because it should be equal for BOTH SEXES. (Both equal in the accusation phase, the defense phase, AND the punishment-for-lying phases...) THAT is what I am advocating. I'm also just trying to say that "safety" is probably where the judges are thinking from; thought here is a disproportionate amount of lies toward men, etc... the judges get off on saying "well safety, next case!" (Which is WRONG... but really nothing we can change w…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:18 PM
-8

OH I FULLY UNDERSTAND how broken it is - I LIVE IT. Your ex wife should be in jail for those crimes. Just like any person who abuses should be. That's my point - there SHOULD BE MORE punishment for people who lie. Having more of THAT will result in LESS lies, no? I mean, I would hope so.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:16 PM
-13

Tell that to my kids, who's bio dad left them home 8 hours a day. Alone. At age 4,5,&6. When mom (my wife) found out - boom. Court took his rights until he earned them back. I'm the stepdad. Until you've lived that hell, step back and think about the worst. Just to get context for what the courts may be thinking. There's much more detail in my case I can't get into but, it's not always about guilty before innocent. It's about safety.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 01:12 PM
-13

Don't forget - a true abusive person may, after hearing of the allegation, cause more damage. This is why this happens. It needs to stay like this, for the protection of the victims. However, there needs to be MORE punishment for those who lie. I've been involved is some cases where, if the rights weren't terminated right away before trial, the accused would pull a "If I can't have them nobody can."
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:17 PM
-19

Don't forget - a true abusive person may, after hearing of the allegation, cause more damage. This is why this happens. It needs to stay like this, for the protection of the victims. However, there needs to be MORE punishment for those who lie. I've been involved is some cases where, if the rights weren't terminated right away before trial, the accused would pull a "If I can't have them nobody can."
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:16 PM
0

Buy something, claim to be a woman, when they don't agree, protest by screaming at them about how they are discriminating against your gender identity.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 11:37 PM
3

This is fine. I'll just shop somewhere else. See how the free market should work?
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:12 PM
1

Good glad I'm not the only reply here like this. But to us normal thinkers - what will the trolls feed on here now?!?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:41 AM
-2

Or how to read an article. He's not actually being trashed by anyone that matters.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:40 AM
1

It's a story and all that but please people, read it. The police listened to the man's account and then dismissed it as nothing important. Here we have a perfect example of a few things: Passersby are retarded and don't help. Someone was trained in life safety. Used it. Police helped woman first as she was victim of accident. Then questioned him. Police dismissed the concern about him being a pervert. This happened in Japan. It literally SCREAMS everything GOOD for Men's Rights as it's got polic…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:39 AM
4

The bigger problem here is that we, as a nation/people, still refer to places as a top "college for women" (per Wellesley's website). That's the biggest and first fucking problem right there.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 01:22 PM
6

My wife died in 2011. It's not feminism's fault. Nor is my pain. Also: 1994 called and wants its website back.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 05:17 PM
1

True. True. :)
/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:26 PM
1

Sorry. I didn't mean to ruffle your internet feathers. I just think the person was a twat. They're often unpredictable.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:51 AM
1

Being sex-ist is. Sex-ism, to me, means I'm describing an entire organization. One person does not a proper population sample make.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:38 PM
-2

It's not sexism. Sexism is when an institution or system or person is sexist consistently. This is just a woman being a selfish asshole and a bad parent.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 11:59 AM
0

Arrested yet. Doesn't always happen right away.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:58 PM
2

Why is this upvoted so much. Did you read the article about how he got stabbed, but also had a probation-violating weapon on him? Don't like the conditions of probation or other things? Doesn't matter, they're still laws.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:23 PM
1

/r/conspiracy - am I right?!
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:55 PM
3

TLDR: it wasn't assault but the cops haven't ruled out this guy not giving her booze and since she's a minor they won't release any more details. TYL: more than one "crime" may happen at the same time and sometimes the police don't have to 'prove it to the media' to explain why they kept someone. Especially with minors. I've dealt with cases like this involving people I know (I won't expound) and the media story is often wrong or not complete. Don't forget that you don't know what you don't know…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:53 PM
22

In America - men have to register for what we call "selective service" (the draft). If you do not, you find trouble later on in life, if they don't realize it right away. If you're a woman - you not only don't have to register, but last I checked, you CANNOT register. Funny story - I registered. I'm a man. But after my wife passed away in 2011, I went to file for social sec death benefits and was almost denied. My entire life to that point (I was 32) I had been in the FEDERAL database as a femal…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:49 PM
12

I'm honestly asking - why are you against hitting women - or are you against hitting anyone, and in this example it happens to be a women, so you wrote "hitting women?"
/r/MensRights18/07/14 01:35 PM
0

Yes. But he comes first in his own life. Is his risk worth that reward? Remember - he says himself, she once ruined his life.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 11:14 AM
-2

Fuck no. YOUR JOB IS NOT to protect others if you just got your life ruined. It's to move on. You are not the law, don't pretend you know how to do it best.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:41 AM
2

Why are people up voting this? It's a terrible idea. HE GAINS NOTHING from speaking to her. WE as a group gain nothing. Let her know you're done and moved on by not communicating with her. Consider any further messages stalking with an intent to entrap you. This isn't like the Good Christian way of giving your attacker an apology - this is "knowing" she wants to apologize so accept that as that and move on.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:40 AM
2

It's been two years. If fb is asked to provide a warrant that part alone will take two years. He doesn't need the worry about more trial and issues.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:38 AM
1

Except in the case where different is better - like with school grades and rewards for performance. But that's not really the same thing I suppose.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 02:39 AM
5

Race, too.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 01:49 AM
2

Or at the very least that the "unreported" are still considered rapists in someone's eyes... which is a terrible way of discussing statistics.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:05 PM
1

Say that in ten years when the only "provider" is Uncle Sam's American Insurance Conglomerate.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:28 PM
1

They seem to have a problem with me posting this in /r/feminism simply because it is also linked from this sub. (When I originally saw it in /r/funny as well) http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/1pgt18/serious_how_is_this_equal_or_is_this_meant_to/ Thanks, Obama.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 06:49 PM
10

Wait - what highschool allows students to leave campus at all? At least, here in New England (Connecticut, specifically), there are exactly zero that I am aware of.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:21 PM
27

It's actually punishing the locale for not performing an equal execution of the duty to protect (and charge this person). The inaction of the government to push charges is the cause of the "punishment" that everyone will feel, when the 1D members choose safety over performing. It's misguided blamecasting like your reply that will foster a believe that he or they "owe" something to someone and the community should ignore how terrible the police were (or in this case were not) acting.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:40 PM
9

Alimony != child support. Stop bringing the child into the equation for more than he/she is actually in the equation. Start reading what you sign in court.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:55 PM
3

I can see the technical reason as to why the google application does what it does. I am a programmer by trade, after all. However, do you expect all google users to understand that somewhere humans are defined as man and then therefore the use of the word man is appropriate in a technical aspect? I mean, I don't use google as anything other than spellcheck when I'm typing shit into the URL bar. But I'm also not the type of person to think that Miley twerking videos is something I need to retweet…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:10 PM
2

Right - but it's about contextual usage here. "A man raped me," does not mean "I was raped by a human being of either sex." I mean, sure, it technically could, but those technicalities aren't really the point here, are they?
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:03 PM
1

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rapist?s=t (Seems to be the best "simple" definition in my super extensive search of two alternate dictionaries) http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rapist (mentions grapes, and then goes on to say a non-gender specific rape definition, but adds in "usually by a man" so to speak, and the examples are all men on women rape. can't really fault them; they are a dictionary not an encyclopedia.)
/r/MensRights27/09/13 02:45 PM
1

except, no not really. the phrase "mankind" is usually used, or "humans" or "humankind" in those situations.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 02:42 PM
5

seems like you are stretching for karma here - this poster in particular does not say men are the perps. it says women can be victims. not the ONLY victims are women. you seem to assume women cannot rape women. the betterment of society will begin when all rape stops and you understand that not every poster has to have every scenario painted on it. did you show us the other poster, behind you, that said something about men getting raped by women? oh, wait, it did not exist? go make one.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:26 PM
13

Actually, the posters imply that women can be victims. Which is true. Not every poster needs to imply that men can be victims too. Especially in the case where the poster, like this ones, does not specifically state the bad person is a male, either.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:24 PM
8

There are other ways than running from a law you do not agree with. I can understand civil disobedience - especially when it comes to rights-based laws. (Such as - how I feel your right to fight for your country or your right to not fight should be just that - your right and your choice.) Then again, maybe you are not American. We do not have a draft here, so nobody is forced to go into the army, or military service. I wish you the best of luck and safety.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 12:41 PM
2

Show up with a Cialis erection that's already lasted 3.5 hours.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 03:09 PM
1

He'll learn the important lesson about how it's completely improper for the teacher to "punish" him for something completely reasonable such as asking for its removal. That would be a sign that the teacher is not very good at what she does...
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:57 PM
3

Except that which he forms within himself as he grows through his experiences in highschool. Ask her to take it down again. Then remind her the next step above her is the guidance dept or the principal. Then the school nursing office.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:02 PM
3

You joke, possibly but I know there exists (or at least I notice it) some form of "white guilt" racism and then some sort of "we (media) expected those minorities to act that way so we don't report when someone of a minority does something bad but since we DON'T expect a white to act that way, when a white person does something bad, we report on it a great deal..."
/r/MensRights25/03/13 02:56 PM
4

Oh, I had them temporarily - especially as an intervenor. However, he was able to convince a judge otherwise after a lengthy battle. Thank you for your thoughts.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:50 PM
5

I have a similar story, but from the point of view of a Step-Parent with no rights, fighting a court system that enables a biological parent to literally get away with abuse; coupled with a dying wife and the knowledge that after her passing he would have no legal rights at all.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:03 PM
-3

this one too?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 05:28 PM
-10

Wait. You mean "Men," right? Isn't that what we are told these days? Rapists and Molesters are only men, or video game designers?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:46 PM
2

Make a post here, with it as the original source picture - but lock/hide it or post it to a private subreddit - then when the posts to FB, twitter, yadda yadda, get toted as "no really it was true!" ... unlock the original here on MR.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:32 PM
-3

I like the picture, especially the handwriting. However, you do know that child support is not for the betterment of the children, correct?
/r/MensRights27/12/12 04:22 PM
1

He could just toss her, physically out of the house onto the street. If she returns, tape a copy of OK's Castle Doctrine ( http://civilliberty.about.com/od/guncontrol/a/Oklahoma-Gun-Laws.htm ) to the door and tell her that he feels unsafe...
/r/MensRights21/12/12 03:30 PM
5

Same for #3. With slightly more blame on the parents and social "norm" that seems to be appearing lately. f(sex) = babies+enjoyment not just "OMG ITS MY RIGHT BECAUSE YAY!"
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:56 PM
2

I hate it when I don't feel like sexors and the other person thinks it's a sign that the sky is falling.... as if sex is the only way to reaffirm love or stuff like that. :/
/r/MensRights12/11/12 02:55 PM
2

Take your own notes. Show them to your lawyer. Remind your lawyer that the marriage counselor is not a lawyer and has no right or ability to minimize anything you feel is endangering to your health and well being. Then have the lawyer file a court order to get your ass another marriage counselor.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 06:08 PM
-1

I'm just surprised they mentioned his skin color.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:01 PM
2

That part where they are different humans and different members of society is also often forgotten. I can think of no less than 3 women here, near me, who get paid more than I do. For the same work. Because they do a better job.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:05 PM
1

Yeap, I see it. Thx. Deleting now.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:07 PM
3

What's even better - the tile on the bathroom here at work is SO reflective, if you are standing at a urinal, you can SEE the guy taking a shit next to you, because of the reflection. That is, I suppose, if you look. But it's such a huge gap anyway... GAA THE EYEBLEACH WHERE IS IT?!
/r/MensRights03/10/12 01:39 PM
-2

Wait.. there is a "push" to remove male only spaces? To what - family restrooms? So someone can complain that the male in there was a creep? Or for saving space? I don't get it.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 01:37 PM
14

To be fair - the gift kind of sucked, and gave me aids.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:05 PM
17

I think I heard on the Opie & Anthony show, of all places, an interview by, and I could be wrong, Rich Voss - who said that when he would pick up chicks (for a 1 night stand, etc) he would always go to a hotel and ask for a wake-up call from the person at the counter. While there, and with the girl by his side, he would make a small joke, something stupid, but memorable. Knowing he was on camera, the girl was (at that time) smiling, laughing, and the person at the counter would remember the reta…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:02 PM
0

...it was an example. Insert any field in the statement.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 03:44 AM
4

Can I create a scholarship to help promote/support men, and only men, working toward a continued education in field of mathematics? (A favorite field of mine.) In all seriousness - I have thought about it, at least locally. Also, I've thought about creating something to help support stepfathers, as we tend to have no legal rights, and my story is, I feel, something people may want to hear. shrug
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:07 PM
2

All good thoughts, just chiming in as a step-father of three wonderful boys who's mother passed away (my wife). Now, since I have raised them on our side of the family with my wife for almost 10 years, I am in a fight with the bio-dad who wants me totally out of the picture. It's nerve wracking and painful.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 06:34 PM
2

Thanks for such a thoughtful and honest reply!
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:30 PM
1

What's your thought on women who dress "inappropriate" (being subjective, but still having social levels of hierarchy) and being "called" out as such in some shape or form. Such as men/women looking at them, in ways that could be seen as creepy but really just play on the mathematical proof that we are genetically evolved to notice boobies and lady parts hanging out of clothes... I've always wondered how many times I could catch myself trying to look at that boob-gap because the woman clearly wo…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 12:48 PM
6

TIL my balls are in your neighbor's car.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:39 PM
1

Well, on a related but "opposite note" I suppose I can say that that same image applies for Connecticut, with the label of "people I know that have been given jail time because I have witnessed them violate court orders related to custody and visitation." Because I know of just that person - who SHOULD be in jail for what I have seen him do, but our system sucks. Oh, and that person? A man. Me? Also a man.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 03:19 PM
34

Reading between the lines, in the FB replies, you would assume that she couldn't find the tampons for her friend. ? ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:16 PM
1

Think again. She could be making 250k a year, and still have an ex husband who was told by a judge to send checks. It's not up to her or what SHE needs, it's up to what takes care of the kids.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 01:33 PM
0

Right!! But say support funds are late but your kid needs food. Is it unreasonable to pay back yourself 50% whe the support check does arrive? So your other budgets still work?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:58 AM
-1

Right! However, she and YOU do not get to decide if the KIDS need the money or not. A judge (assumed here) does. If a judge decides it, it happens, NO MATTER your opinion.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 01:12 AM
0

To be fair - it is FAB-U-LUS!
/r/MensRights17/03/12 01:11 AM
0

But, really if you made 210k a year and your ex still has to pay 500 a month in support. what's it matter if you buy within your means?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 01:10 AM
0

Even if the parent who can afford to raise the child abuses them?
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:53 PM
1

Yeah - it's the "hell naw" that really sets the tone/mood of the replies there and here, I think. If she said what you said would have been a better response - you are right - a lot of this would have been different.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:52 PM
-1

So what you are saying, is, basically that people who are ordered to pay child support and fail to, should never have to pay what they would have and can skip those months?
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:52 PM
2

A savings account is allowed (at least in the states) and considered part of the child's well being. So is entertainment. /me is recently widowed and has read, letter for letter, the documentation from Uncle Sam on just this issue.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:50 PM
0

Actually, the money is hers and the responsibility of ensuring the children are healthy and taken care of is hers. Child support is there to support the children, not pay them for being kids. A child does not know how to pay bills. Though some adults do pay bills like children.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:49 PM
-2

How do you know that? Has she purchased anything for herself in the last n months? Has 100% of her money been for the kids? Do you even know her situation? You seem to sound like you are in the know in this issue and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:47 PM
3

And in, Connecticut (USA) - even if they WERE married, stepparent income does not count.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:46 PM
-1

I'm 100% for transparency, BUT THAT MEANS YOU NEED TO REALIZE that the monies from ALL income sources may be into the same account... SO where and when she spends the 500 for support does not matter as long as at month end, she SPENDS MONEY TO SUPPORT THE CHILDREN. (at least the 500, but likely more) But you see - the AMOUNT of the support is NOT HERS TO CONTROL, but the MONEY is. Not acknowledging that she is in control of how the money is disbursed is what is making you sound like a fucking sh…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:18 PM
0

See, that's your problem. You assume all the money each month has to be spent on something the child sees right then in that month. Rent. Gas so the mom can get to/from work. Food Phone bill Clothing Heat Movie night / entertainment College savings Medical bills (with possible other coverage outlined in agreement) et atl. The point being - your bullheaded lack of acceptance in common accounting practices, makes it sound like you think all recipients of child support money should have ONE HUGE SP…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:04 PM
0

I'm not defending spending the money in immoral or child-hurting ways. Here, I'll hand you one of the 3 dollars out of my wallet. where did that dollar come from? If you are my child, do you care? If we are working with math here, does it matter?
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:32 PM
3

Wrong. Well, sort of. The jars concept was there because people on this thread don't seem to understand basic accounting. If I didn't get my 500 for the month of January from you (ASS! OMG!) and put 500 of my own money aside and say, tagged it in a spreadsheet as "child support arrears" and then received 500 from you in Feb, you are still in arrears for the month of January. Which means, I still had to pay for things in Jan to support our child, right? Out of my own money. Even if I had worked J…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:08 PM
0

sandwich artists, all of you.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:59 PM
1

You realize that (all) tax payers don't directly pay child support, right? (At least in the USA).
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:59 PM
-1

If I put 30 dollars into a jar (3 ten dollar bills) and then put in two more ten dollar bills .. and take out 1 ten dollar bill. which of the deposits was that bill from? When you can answer that question, you can speak to how budgets and accounts are actually managed.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:58 PM
1

Right! As well as a possible earmarking of a certain % for things like college, or accidents, rent, heat, etc.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:57 PM
4

It's actually not a documentation of intent - it is a documentation of the pure mathematics related to budget management. Maybe she's put off buying shoes for a decade, and now can finally adjust her budget to allow for something for herself. Which is, sans kids being kept ok, not illegal.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:56 PM
23

Not to be a dick here, because I know many many people who misuse the money - my kids' bio-father for example, won't provide an accounting of the money he gets from various places wherein he is actually required to... but I digress. My thought/example - maybe this mom bought the shoes after the child support check because she previously spent that amount of $ on supporting the kids, and it all goes into the same account anyway. Likely not true but, still, devil's advocate seems to be missing fro…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:54 PM
16

I too only recently found this sub. I am a stepfather of three boys between age 11 and 13. The oldest is great, the younger two are fed lies by their biological father. See, my wife, their mother, died after her six year battle with cancer, just last September. I've fought every day since, in court and as recently as last Tuesday, in my front yard (not physical, verbal/emotional) with the bio dad to keep my legally granted 50% custody. I hear stepfathers don't get any/many rights, and I've had t…
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter