TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Gilbert_Gaped Archive

View 0 posts and 80 comments by Gilbert_Gaped on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Ok.. It's really just not that deep to me. I'm all about men's rights. I just like to be congruent and logical in all aspects of any argument. It's just how I saw it in the moment, and OP and I were fine with the interaction. I'm now moving on.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 03:31 AM
-11

Your criteria is verging on "splitting hairs", while detracting from the original, broader point. I'm not here to constantly rehash hatred of women, and try to make everything fit a narrative. I'm merely responding to this one post, because the moment I read it, I thought of this song... Which was never censored on its own... And then I was reminded of this video (which is merely acting out the actual words in Eminem's song, from a billboard album). So, sure... You made some points.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 01:18 AM
-4

Yeah. Neither of them is right. ✌🏻
/r/MensRights15/02/25 12:59 AM
-5

Well... It would be a good point if it were true, but here is an example that proves that wrong.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 12:32 AM
3

It means the household or family dynasty is run by a man (moreso related to money or power). The opposite is a matriarchy.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 10:05 PM
2

Your scenario. It was in your scenario.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 01:26 AM
0

And I'm sure she doesn't want a serious relationship with a guy comparing her to a car.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 01:25 AM
3

I guess those would be the things also attracting you, if you want a "car fax"?
/r/MensRights13/02/25 01:25 AM
13

He's comparing women to cars, and using the term interchangeably. But he also has a little problem understanding supply and demand.... If a woman has 1000s of guys circling her and you want in, asking for a mandatory report on her sexual history will just get you removed from the pool.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 04:43 PM
1

Probably not, but that's hardly their doing.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 03:38 PM
0

And?
/r/MensRights10/02/25 08:43 PM
0

Not women. Who hurt you?
/r/MensRights10/02/25 08:42 PM
-1

Yup. You are certainly free to complain endlessly with no regard for any change or solution, and you are certainly free to incorrectly direct your anger towards women, even though it belongs with the lie you were sold (and bought, like a fucking fool). ✌🏻
/r/MensRights10/02/25 08:41 PM
-12

It's our fellow men who say these comments, not women.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 01:56 AM
-56

Self-reflective, personally. Then I would change my strategy or acquire what I lacked, to engage with the world as it is. Or I would move on. I would not whine and complain out of perceived entitlement or unfairness.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 08:32 PM
-81

No, but I don't go online expecting to make friends, then disparage the whole service or internet because I didn't connect with anyone.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 08:24 PM
-9

Oh god. Yes you do. What do you think people did for all of humanity, prior to the last 20 years of this new, and failed method of dating? You just want it to work because you think it sounds easy. Like online shopping. Market yourself like a business and be willing to pivot. Reap the rewards or suffer the failures, but do it on your own merit.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 08:17 PM
-15

Even? It's a new invention and she was around for actual real-world dating, so it would've been immediately clear to her as the rest of us, that this wasn't ever a part of natural mating rituals.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 08:16 PM
-103

It's not online shopping -- you aren't guaranteed a woman, just because you signed up. EDIT: Keep the downvotes coming I love the glaring point it's proving, about why we have a god-damned "loneliness" epidemic. You're buying lies, boys. And seemingly doing nothing but complaining... downvoting, into the ether.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 08:15 PM
-1

Isn't that just basic logic and how we men would operate too, if we had so many women circling us as they do men? Wouldn't we choose who we preferred most?
/r/MensRights07/02/25 08:13 PM
-45

Sorry, but what exactly is a woman's fault here? That they have a choice?
/r/MensRights07/02/25 08:12 PM
-11

Then don't fucking online date.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 08:11 PM
4

Most psychopaths will conspire to not get caught, regardless of method.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:58 PM
18

Women have always favoured poison as their means to murder men, since they usually have a physical disadvantage.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:28 PM
1

But men should have a say, after conception?
/r/MensRights31/01/25 12:50 PM
7

So we men need to step up and become psychologists, then.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 12:21 PM
1

To achieve this ideal we can guarantee safe and legal abortions for those carrying the baby and we can guarantee equal rights to safe surrender and to unilateral adoption for everyone else. You are talking about women going through a physical ordeal either way, at the choice of men. No matter what your ideology is for men, that sentence equates to women losing agency over their own bodies.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 12:13 PM
1

But the words that follow that statement, are incongruous.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 04:57 AM
7

Don't. Fuck. Women. You. Don't. Trust. We can agree it's unfair, in a pure ideological sense.... But it doesn't change the reality. We must do what is in our power, with the realities we are given. ✌🏻
/r/MensRights31/01/25 04:44 AM
1

Yes. I'm fairly new and trying desperately to find men's rights activism, minus the rage and hate.....
/r/MensRights31/01/25 04:29 AM
-1

That sounds like idealism. Reality: women have to physically bear the baby for 9 months. It's incomparable to our (male) experience, and will never be equal (as far as when decisions can and will be made). To achieve your idealism, you need to trample on the rights of women's bodily autonomy. I'm all for men's rights (as they are clearly in my best interest), but not at the expense of trampling on human rights. Besides, looking for "equality", is exactly the problem with feminism today.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:24 AM
-1

Not a woman, but thanks ✌🏻.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:21 AM
-3

Try posting the whole sentence, in context.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:20 AM
1

You read it right. I can't even say this without putting others down (not my intent), but reading comprehension is severely diminishing these days. Language is nuanced, and it is important to read each word and statement carefully (especially qualifiers). What's worse these days though, is that often when comments are questioned and then it's further explained or clarified by the person who said it, people will argue them, as if they know what was meant (better than the person who said it).
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:18 AM
1

He implied change so women are more interested No, I didn't. You're angry over something I didn't say. I am the literal horse's mouth here -- read it again.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:14 AM
1

saying "just change" is shitty advice Quote where that was said.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:11 AM
-1

No one said he needs to change. I said, either he is off-putting in general, OR he hasn't found the right person who wants him exactly as he is. If he doesn't feel he's off-putting, then the latter would apply.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:10 AM
-7

You haven't understood what I said, if you think I've said he needs to change.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:08 AM
-52

Autonomous individuals (including women) can judge potential dating partners, on any criteria they choose (and it might not be the same criteria as yours). Women are as individual as men, and so are their tastes. The only common denominator in this scenario, is you. So either there is something you need to work on to not be so generally off-putting, or you haven't met the right person who is looking for someone like you.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 08:12 PM
-1

Nope. The reality is what it is. It's her body, and her choice doesn't end as prematurely as ours. But I'm a realist overall, preferring to deal with what is, instead of lamenting what I feel entitled to.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 05:03 PM
1

We men don't have to put our sperm where a baby might result. That seems to be where our choice ends.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 04:27 PM
0

Sounds like you're saying women's bodies should be there for use, at the whims of men. She'd have to go through a medical proceedure against her will, or be an incubator against her will, to satisfy the wills of men. When did men's rights devolved into removing the autonomy and rights of women?
/r/MensRights30/01/25 04:25 PM
1

Possession is 9/10 of the law.... Once your sperm is in her, you've given it to her and now the choice becomes hers. You can debate it and get nowhere, or you can take this knowledge and use it to make more informed choices about how you move in the future.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 04:23 PM
-2

We do have a choice. We choose who to fuck and we choose whether or not to take responsibility for our own contraception. We can refuse sex without a condom and with women we don't trust to consult us, should an unexpected pregnancy arise. Then, our choice is over. So don't fuck women you can't trust when it comes to being on the same page, and take responsibility for demanding condoms
/r/MensRights30/01/25 04:17 PM
-20

Children should always be first, because they have the most future. Their primary guardians should be next (whomever needs to survive to raise them). I believe this was the original spirit of the protocol -- not that women were more "valuable".
/r/MensRights29/01/25 02:41 AM
5

Don't worry. This is just prep. These are the types of questions you'll have to answer if anything comes from this, so it's best to think these things through for yourself now... If only to put your own mind at ease. ✌🏻
/r/MensRights25/01/25 04:26 AM
-2

Did you have to "brush past" her, to get away?
/r/MensRights25/01/25 04:22 AM
1

Is there anything she could have misconstrued as a push?
/r/MensRights25/01/25 12:23 AM
4

What were you arguing about? Were there cameras?
/r/MensRights24/01/25 10:12 PM
1

When was this put to a public vote in your country then? Link us, and prove your point.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 04:35 PM
1

🪞
/r/MensRights24/01/25 01:09 AM
1

You "told" with no facts.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 01:08 AM
1

As decided and voted by men.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 08:14 PM
1

I'm sorry... I am a man and I have rights and agencies over my entire body. What right do men not have over their body? I would expect that if I could carry a baby as a man, I would have rights to decide what to do with my body.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 08:10 PM
1

I'm sorry, but women have the privilege to choose what happens to their own bodies, but no rights over it? Yeah this sub is done for me. This isn't about actual men's rights, but about hatred of women. And apparently, fawning to those types. Good luck with that ✌🏻.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 06:52 PM
-1

And both of these examples then, are down to men just as much as women.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:19 PM
0

So the same groups also taking away women's rights to choice? Doesn't sound like this is an issue between the genders thenselves.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 06:25 AM
1

Just because you missed it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 06:24 AM
-4

Let me just make this easy for you. Conscription started in its current form in 1940 as voted in by congress. At that time there were 531 total members of Congress, of which eight were women - that's 1.5%. Trust me there's a lot to be angry at women for, but this is definitely not one of them. This was a choice made by other men.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 01:03 AM
-4

Name the vote which occured, where this was decided.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:55 AM
0

I would answer your question, if it made any sense at all. What logic are you assuming?
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:53 AM
-17

It's men who make most of the decisions about this. Lobby them.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 08:11 PM
1

Cool. Your not arguing any point I've actually made. My point again, is that we are diluting our argument by attributing these deaths to some sort of violent nature in women. But that's not what these deaths are likely due to. Punishment is a seperate argument.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 08:09 PM
0

Yes, I do realise that. Do you have a point? I do. My point is that it is a defining characterization of motive. And motive is what this thin argument about violence amongst women, is based. Killing while in psychosis, is attributed to a mental break, not a violent tendency.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 12:45 PM
-4

No one said they should be treated differently. In fact they should be treated the same, when in psychosis. However, pregnancy verifiably disturbs hormones within the body, and this can cause psychosis. If we want our arguments to hold weight, we shouldn't ignore these factors.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 12:43 PM
0

Actually, by the definition of insanity under the law, psychosis can be grounds for this ruling.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 05:58 AM
-4

It's psychosis. No, psychosis is not controllable by the subject.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 05:52 AM
-17

No, the affect of pregnancy on the human body, does not pertain to teenaged boys. PPD is psychosis, and often under diagnosed when presented, seeking initial treatment. Again, I think we're better off making better points. Maybe we're even better to stand up as men and learn to recognize the warning signs, to protect children.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 05:49 AM
-68

Post partum depression. It's not inherent violence, it's a hormone imbalance caused by giving birth. I think we have enough valid points to make for men, without grasping at straws.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 08:09 PM
1

Read it until you understand it. ✌🏻
/r/ExRedPill19/01/25 07:50 PM
1

What else do you actually have any power over? Keep doing the same thing, and get the same results. I have a quote for you: It’s dark because you are trying too hard. Lightly child, lightly. Learn to do everything lightly. Yes, feel lightly even though you’re feeling deeply. Just lightly let things happen and lightly cope with them. I was so preposterously serious in those days, such a humorless little prig. Lightly, lightly – it’s the best advice ever given me. When it comes to dying even. Noth…
/r/ExRedPill19/01/25 04:50 PM
1

Yes. Work on yourself.
/r/ExRedPill19/01/25 04:46 PM
1

when did you argue that? Second paragraph, after the introductory line. Read it again.
/r/ExRedPill19/01/25 04:45 PM
2

Only our "toxic conditioning" tells you that there are patterns with male "expectations". Bro, you gotta stop analyzing life and go live one.
/r/ExRedPill14/01/25 01:52 AM
2

But you can't analyze what women want, as a whole. That's the whole point.
/r/ExRedPill13/01/25 12:22 AM
2

You're complicating things way more than they need to be. The truth is, there are so many different people in the world, that there are way too many variables to dictate any one "truth" or "rule" in attraction or dating -- except one.... Not every woman out there who is single, is an option for you. In many (or most) cases, either you don't fit what she wants in some way, or she doesn't fit what you want in some way. You have to accept when someone doesn't want you, don't worry yourself about th…
/r/ExRedPill13/01/25 12:08 AM
1

More dismissal. I see you've yet to do any root-cause analysis.
/r/ExRedPill09/01/25 03:15 AM
7

Yeah. Most don't want a dude who dismisses them.
/r/ExRedPill01/01/25 11:46 PM
11

So you've decided that women don't know what they want, thus dismissing them?
/r/ExRedPill31/12/24 10:01 PM
14

If we want to know what women want, we should probably just listen to them? Why are we reading any man's word on the matter? Anytime women come in droves to tell us what they want, it's often just met with dismissive debate from what I have seen.
/r/ExRedPill31/12/24 12:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter