TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GildToDeleteAccount Archive

View 0 posts and 97 comments by GildToDeleteAccount on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I mean why do you care if someone identifies as something other than male or female, be it androgenous, a potato, or an attack helicopter? As you pointed out we already have sex, which covers genetic/medical side, so whats the point of even having gender? It doesn't help anyone to have gender except to force antiquated gender stereotypes. We already have the definitive structure for sexualization, anything beyond that becomes a social construct that isn't helpful unless you have some examples wh…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:11 PM
3

Yes, the daughter of a rather mental politician Mike Huckabee.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:23 PM
0

Except that if you don't give a fuck about anyone's gender identities this becomes absolutely irrelevant. The leverage their using to divide us is people's unnecessary desire to demand binary conformity. edit: we have sex already, we don't need gender. Someone reading this please provide an example where gender is necessary where the medical definition of sex doesn't provide everything necessary
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:22 PM
1

Cheers, just wanted to throw that out there. Thank you for the response!
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:41 PM
1

I'm not trying to say that women should be elected b/c their women, but I got to ask; You do see the irony in your statement; "Women, who are aren't being hired for experienced positions, are having a harder time submitting resumes showing relevant work for experience positions."
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:24 PM
1

These were both a great read, but it doesn't anywhere distinguish that rape (specifically) is 50-50 gender split, and when controlling for all forms of sexual violence it suggests a 38-62 split. Am I missing something?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 07:33 PM
0

While I partially agree with you, I do not believe that, when all is accounted for, the split would land 50-50. That seems more like you guestimating off of lack-of-data inference.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 07:27 PM
13

We should be ecstatic about this. It's concerned for the victim, its non judgmental, it accurately depicts what is known about the issues, and most importantly it will lead to more reported sexual assaults, which will allow more studies concerning male sexual assualt, which in turn will hopefully spur data driven solutions.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 07:23 PM
5

Well that and Male Sexual Assualts are a) vastly under reported, and b) lack wide range data sets and reconciliation, so it would be pretty hard to provide accurate statistics without a long slew of explanatory subtext, probably as long as the poster itself.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 07:21 PM
1

Haha sorry I was doing excel all day! =sum(excel:redditpost)
/r/MensRights28/06/17 02:25 PM
3

The best way to know if you're a problem is when you get called out and start blaming someone else to avoid your own faults. Just saying.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 04:42 PM
19

Five years of watching 30+ 3yr olds as a teenager (part of a team of three) - I get that its hard, but I would have lost my job, and then sum, if I lost track of a child. Not saying that it shouldn't happen, just saying that if you lose your child its your own fault, not anyone elses.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 04:38 PM
3

...by peeing on toilet seats?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 02:01 PM
2

O look at you, rebel w/o a cause /s
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:45 PM
4

Wut. ? Don't listen to this guy. Its fine if you feel like you need to identify as being a woman, but don't be an asshole and piss all over the seat. That doesn't solve anything or help anyone.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:35 PM
927

“I saw this man with my daughter in his hands walking toward the parking lot. What would you do?” How about not lose track of your 2 year old fucking daughter to begin wtih. Negligent piece of shit. edit: as people have stated its not fair to call this negligence since he only lost the child once. However, it is negligent to blame your failures on someone else, and then assault them. Take it as you will, friendos
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:25 PM
41

I have a confession to make: I envy sexually uninhibited women, and more specifically, women who cheat back (particularly because I’ve never done it). "I like the idea of this but don't want the negative consequences that comes with it, so I idealize something I've never tried before while practicing the opposite of what I preach. That or I'm lying so my bf won't leave me."
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:36 PM
1

Because the MRA has a nasty problem with overlap from alt-view people. A lot of us have been calling them out on it, and I personally don't believe in this "take down the feminists will win us the war" bs. I think its a misleading rally flag. I will admit tho that there are some issues with extreme feminism, but no different than any other extreme faction. Often less so, if I'm being completely honest, when you compare to certain extremisms like white nationalism. edit: I mean jesus look at some…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:18 PM
1

Is it really that hard to imagine how people with this view might be thinking? What they feel?How they see it as quite literally the moral equivalent of killing a child that is already born? Yes. To be a bit pedantic, its like saying you should be scared of the monster in the closet because your child feels its there. I won't hold it against other people having issues with it - no one is forcing anyone to have abortions - but demanding that I (or anyone else) live my life relative to that imagin…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:14 PM
1

Especially the reproductive side of owning one's sexuality; i.e. abortions
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:05 PM
0

Yeah, typical shit our constituents feel the need to do. We're our own biggest enemy when it comes to this. Also, yeah most guys don't care about women owning their sexuality, but lets not pretend there isn't an extreme religious community in our country that devoutly cares about controlling women's sexuality.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:04 PM
3

Ahhh yes, fight poison with poison like in Iron Monkey. I understand now.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 07:07 PM
3

Yeah uh... well... I hope you have a nice day, friendo.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:42 PM
2

Yes, but this article (and you by proxy) are conflating Men's Rights and conservatism. Only complaint.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:35 PM
3

That isn't to say that I don't see people taking up as much space as possible on the subways
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:25 PM
12

To be fair the seat sizes are built and designed as co-gendered and only take into account people of medium size. My friend is nearly 7' tall and I'm 6'2" and we both have trouble fitting exactly into the regular size seat on the NYC MTA/Subway. I can condense myself well enough not to spill over but he absolutely cannot. There's just no way. Its similar to the staircase issue. Stair height and treads are designed around the smaller users and are awkward and impractical for larger people. Hence …
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:13 PM
1

Straw man arguments can include juxtapositions, especially hypothetical ones, as they aren't antithetical. Hes right, this is a straw man argument and looks poorly because the hypothetical SJW's narrative is hyperbolic. People reading it see the hyperbole, which greatly undermines any truths to be found in the "example."
/r/MensRights12/06/17 06:23 PM
6

Wait what? The "Thoughts and Prayers" posts are like 90% 50+yr olds on my social media. The only time I see anyone 30 or below post "thoughts are with you" is directly after a major shooting.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 06:16 PM
46

I agree with this. But I'd like to add that men are also obese, and that obese interferes with erectile blood flow.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 02:03 PM
0

Umm... tell that to our (USA) president? Just saying. It seemed to work pretty well.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:36 PM
5

B/c rules changed, he probably signed up right before the change.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:06 PM
7

we need and want each other. men just want equality with women. What everyone seems to forget on both sides. I vote you for person to be in charge of shit.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:04 PM
1

I don't doubt the double dipping, but I sincerely doubt that is how they calculate the CS. X makes 100,000 per year, Y makes 40,000 per year, Percentage of CS estimate: 25% 100,000 + 40,000 = 140,000 140,000 / 2 = 70,000 70,000 * .25 = 17500 Percentage of X's income = 17500/100000*100 = 17.5% Percentage of Y's income: 17500/40000*100 = 43.75% Yeah, I doubt that's done that way except in very specific cases.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 05:02 PM
153

They don't teach analogies anymore since it was removed from the SATs in 2005
/r/MensRights05/06/17 04:41 PM
2

Thats cool dude I'm not even reading your responses, its clearly not worth my time since you don't actually want to discuss what you're pretending you want to, NOR ARE YOU PROVIDING ANY CITATIONS BECAUSE YOU'RE A HYPOCRIT AND WERE CAUGHT LYING SEVERAL TIMES PRETENDING TO READ THE SOURCES YOU REQUESTED. If for some magical reason I find a well thought out, cited response in my inbox I'll give you a second chance. Or, if you specifically drag and drop parts of my sources that you think refute or d…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 07:42 PM
2

Awww you want to talk about a complex issue but all this reading is making your head hurt? I'm so, so very sorry that issues are complicated. Perhaps if I find a picture book of the topic I can link that instead.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 07:18 PM
2

Because the 400 page document shows a large variety of information all relevant to the topic at hand. Omg have you never seen a report thats longer than 5 pages? Thats it isn't it. You're too busy linking 5 page news articles to know what a commission report is supposed to look like. haha thats so sad buddy.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 07:17 PM
2

And lastly, since you have no idea what you're talking about, the difference commissions used different methodologies, as stated in their methodology sections. Anyyyyy day now you may provide your own source. O shit haha what am I think, ofcourse you wont. You'll just deny everyone else's sources until your blue in the face. Cause thats you. Thats how you act.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 07:16 PM
2

Here ya go, cause we already know you're not gonna read it; Page four of that commission; Black male offenders received longer sentences than white male offenders. The differences in sentence length have increased steadily since Booker. Cool, so they agree with each other. Weird how they can look at the same data over multiple commissions and find that its still the same conclusion. Must be everything in the universe except you being wrong tho, so who knows why that is.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 07:13 PM
1

I did link it retard, and I provided where it was the first time, in the fucking conclusion. Imagine this. You go to conclusion and hit find. My god, guess you need someone to hold you hand the ENTIRE fucking time. Really speaks volumes to your ability to analyze something, huh?
/r/MensRights01/06/17 07:13 PM
2

Yes I'm the child. Not the hyprocrit who doesn't provide any sources, lies about reading sources he requested, and can't understand data. You get back the respect you put in and since you're a disrespectful little fuck thats exactly how I'm gonna treat you. Come back in 5 days when you've managed to read any of this. And whats super funny to me is that they are in deed citing another source because they came to the SAME CONCLUSION. Here is that source, which comes to the same conclusion: http://…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 07:10 PM
9

I would talk to your supervisor immediately. Calmly explain to your boss that this person came up and started verbally assaulting you about an opinion you expressed to someone else in a private conversation she was not privy to. That this person repeatedly used language not appropriate for work, and that the language was purposefully inflammatory, purposefully and maliciously slanderous, in an attempt to publicly shame you in front of your peers. Explain to them that you feel her attack on your …
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:48 PM
98

This level of cognitive dissonance is unreal.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:37 PM
2

And with that you can fuck off until you've read all the information provided like a normal person who requests data, instead of being a cry baby who just wants to be right. Have fun. Feel free to respond after you've actually read everything, and we can continue our conversation on the SPECIFIC TOPIC of Black LWOP for non-violent crimes, since that was the actual topic we were discussing.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:32 PM
2

I just did, and providing you the full information doesn't make me a coward you jackass, it makes it so you have all the data at hand. You really are retarded aren't you? What you're saying is "I don't know anything about the data but I have my opinions and instead of reading the information I just want to discredit everyone else who disagrees with me." I stated MULTIPLE TIMES it was in the conclusion EXPLICITLY.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:26 PM
2

huhhhh duuuurr LOL Thats you. Thats how you sound when you don't provide any data at all in a discussion, or even discuss the data that you didn't read. http://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/news/congressional-testimony-and-reports/mandatory-minimum-penalties/20111031-rtc-pdf/Chapter_12.pdf Page 347 (did you even get past page one when you pretended to read this? Doubt it.) For example, a recent Commission analysis found that, after controlling for relevant factors, Black male offenders re…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:25 PM
2

The data shows felony convictions and when crossed with types of arrest shows felony convictions for non-violent crimes by crime types. Its like talking to a toddler. I'm not sure you've ever done any statistical analysis in your entire life, and if you have god help the company you did it for.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:22 PM
1

Except that (again for the 5th time) they explicitly state that they do find discrimination against black males in their conclusion. And no, this wasn't bamboozlement I link the whole commission (which you didn't read, cause you're a liar) because its relevant. If you want to read the conclusion, click the fucking conclusion link on the commission. Have fun being a liar. The rest of us have real work to do.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:20 PM
2

Lol, "I can't disprove the data or the fact the the USSC and BSJ agree with you, so heres something completely different." Ok Thats cool. I'll be extra sure to read everything you provided. O wait you didn't provide anything! Well that should make all my reading real easy.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:10 PM
1

Also, You're a fucking liar. You did not read every single thing and combined their data in 14 minutes.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:08 PM
1

Again, all of which support my claim. Much like how you won't accept the ACLU's analysis, I'm not gonna accept your "omg no it doesn't" as analysis until you specifically cite what parts of these reports disprove the USSC's, and ACLU's, claim. You and your fucking double standard buddy, really tired of the bullshit from you. edit: specifically you, not the other people here.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:02 PM
1

First off I linked you to a very thoughtful statistical analysis that includes these data sets, while you're just lambasting without evidence, despite the USSC EXPLICITLY STATING THEIR DATA SHOWS RACIAL DISCRIMINATION. And whats even scarier is you're unable to combined that data and see that the percentages of non-violent crimes (included by crime class) when compared to federal incarceration by race are disproportionate, which is exactly what the commission has pointed out. Where the fuck is y…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:01 PM
1

Also, all things being fair, you're not citing what parts refer to there being no discrimination, you're literally doing what you just said isn't ok to do and thats to just claim something without showing specific statistics. A bit hypocritical, especially considering that the commission explicitly states the data shows what I am saying.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 05:58 PM
2

Then you need reading glasses haha cause the BSJ and the USSC explicitly disagree with you, as they stated.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 05:56 PM
1

I'm sorry what are you talking about, the 2011 Commission clearly shows race discrimination, and states explicitly in their conclusion, the above.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 05:55 PM
2

I am not confused, I'm on point. O you mean like this report specifically addressing this issue: Recent analyses also indicate that some sentencing differences may be associated with specific demographic characteristics, and these differences may be increasing post-Booker. For example, a recent Commission analysis found that, after controlling for relevant factors, Black male offenders received longer sentences than White male offenders, and that those differences in sentence length have increas…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 05:52 PM
2

This is gonna be some reading for you my friend - Recent analyses also indicate that some sentencing differences may be associated with specific demographic characteristics, and these differences may be increasing post-Booker. For example, a recent Commission analysis found that, after controlling for relevant factors, Black male offenders received longer sentences than White male offenders, and that those differences in sentence length have increased steadily since Booker. 2011 REPORT TO THE CO…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 05:43 PM
2

The Data is from U.S. Sentencing Commission and state Departments of Corrections for federal and state data.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:20 PM
1

What are you talking about, please actually go read that. That's the U.S. Sentencing Commission and state Departments of Corrections federal and state data, not ACLU's data. They clearly cite everything at the end. All of the data is included if you actually read it.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:19 PM
1

I didn't bring gender into, I'm responding to something that is already currently gendered. Those aren't the same thing. All I was pointing out was that homeless women face sexual assault when compared to non-homeless women (which seemed to have drawn some confusion from my phrasing, perhaps) so the concept of a homeless shelter for women, if that's what they need, isn't really a problem to provide so long as their are programs in place that help men as well.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:11 PM
1

Some redneck who is a racist and touts the confederate flag specifically to be racist and a black panther probably have little in common but they should both be welcome assuming they leave their shit at the door. I agree, unfortunately some of the responses I've gotten haven't shared this opinion. I even got one that stated that White Nationalism is good in general, and for our movement. I don't know why black males aren't involved in the MRM, I only have suspicions and the evidence that they ar…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:05 PM
1

Its been very disheartening. Especially the person responding that White Nationalism is OK and good for our movement :/
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:00 PM
1

I'm not trying to have parallel discussions over the same topic - so please continue this here
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:55 PM
1

I never said we were racist as a movement, what? I said blacks aren't being included. Those aren't the same thing - I'm responding to other people who wanted to have a specific conversation but when I get a chance I will respond to you, thank you for taking the time to write this all out.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:54 PM
1

Sure, I would love to discuss, thanks for taking the time. Lets do a very specific one, if that's ok? Specifically, LWOP (Life w/o the possibility of Parole) sentencing for non-violent crimes in Illinois. According to judicial census data, Black males are sentenced to LWOP for non-violent crimes at a rate of 33-to-1 when compared to white males, when controlled for equated crimes. ACLU Statics Analysis Edit: Statistical data is from U.S. Sentencing Commission and state Departments of Corrections…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:51 PM
1

Unlike you, many of us see black men as men, nothing more and nothing less. That's fine and all but that doesn't make race a non-issue in our current time, and most black men will consistently point out that they do not have the same experience in America as white men, nor is it fair to pretend they don't have issues white people don't have.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:32 PM
1

Actually I'm not ok with black separatism which is why I've been speaking out about their lack of inclusion. I get that you want all things to be equal but the fact that black men don't come to MRM conferences speaks to racial issues already being present. Its cute that you want to think of everything as a male issue and ignore race, but thats not how race works currently in the world. And I do not like white nationalism any more than I like Jihadism, or racial segregation. They are inherently e…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:27 PM
1

black men are even interested in showing up in the first place? So black men just decided they have no interest and there isn't anything the MRA can do about it, nor is there anything the MRA is doing that would deflect black male interests in MRM? Is that what your suggesting? I honestly can't tell because of the semi-rhetorical nature of the question... What I'm saying, and what the two op-ed pieces are also saying, is that given the goals of the MRA Black males should be a natural fit, but ar…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:10 PM
1

wouldn't it behoove one to be helped through that experience by say, people who are in that group that are caring and nonviolent? Not according to modern psychology, that would be considered end-stage treatment of immersion therapy. I can't really speak as a man about how it is to be a woman who is sexually assaulted, just like I wouldn't listen to a woman dictating what its like to be a man who was sexually assaulted. If they say that's what they need, and psychology thinks its beneficial for r…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:01 PM
1

I'm sorry did you just say White Nationalism is ok?
/r/MensRights01/06/17 02:48 PM
4

What are you talking about? I didn't compare men and women homelessness, I'm comparing sexual assault of homeless women to sexual assault of non-homeless women. Homeless women get assaulted more than non homeless women. They have an abnormally high rate of assault in their gender bracket, which is why their is a need for women only homeless shelters. Calm the fuck down, its not a fucking competition you jackass. Just because women get sexually assaulted doesn't mean men can't or don't. I didn't …
/r/MensRights01/06/17 02:36 PM
1

I was responding to your "men are scury," which is written sarcastically, with the actual facts.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 02:19 PM
-4

Homeless women have an abnormally high rate of being sexually assaulted. It's not absurd to building women only shelters. What is absurd is not building male only shelters because men are also sexually abused and are more commonly homeless. edit: wow, downvotes because I think both genders need homeless shelters. Good on your MRs.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:44 PM
-2

Edit: sorry you're not the same person as before - please read the articles in the other post. Its clear that black inclusion is a major issue with the MRA, and many of them posit it because of the overlap with the Alt-Right and White Nationalism.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 06:13 PM
-7

You don't understand how Burden of Proof works, I'm afraid. I'm pointing out the normative perspective, not making a claim. I don't have to cite the normative because it is the expectation. If you're suggesting the normative is wrong, then feel free to cite away. Just for shits and giggles, here is proof anyway; Pictures and videos of MRA speeches are always predominately white, even in areas that aren't, if not entirely (including protesters) a white audience. There are very few Black MRM leade…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 05:45 PM
-2

Their accusations of racism are without merit and deserve no response. That's not true, its not a lie, and I've seen it first hand at several of the MRA events. A quick, cursory look at the social media prevalence shows tons of people who co-identify with both philosophies. [IE MRA and White Nationalism.] The MRA events I've been lucky enough to attend are also overwhelmingly white. Sometimes completely white. I'm from NYC, so maybe thats ok where you're from, but its not for me. Thats also an i…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 05:06 PM
1

First, you're framing it about their perspective. What do you want? Do you want radical elements, like White Nationalists, driving our discourse or solutions? Being our spokes people? That doesn't erase the prevalence of these actors nor the issue. At a certain point its not just about winning the war, but about personal morality, and I don't want to be associated with immoral people, nor do I want our young men radicalized. Radicalization of our youth is the exact issue most of you take with fe…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:24 PM
4

The Bull is a stark reminder of the severe disparity of wealth between classes, and imagery suggestive that having control over the market (being the bull rider) gives you its inherent qualities, which, as a bull, is mainly to trample other people to get what you want. The little girl statue was some bullshit a financial company put up to try and reconcile the negative opinions on the bull statue. The entitled actors here are the very wealthy, and they want it to be perceived as a feminist icon …
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:19 PM
2

I mean, there are a literal billion of these things for all creeds, genders, philosophies, theosophies, heights, weights, handedness, disabilities. I don't see why we should care. Its self-affirmation from insecurities. We do the same thing.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:11 PM
-4

Yes, the little girl, not the Bull, is the representation of entitlement here. [/s]
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:06 PM
7

People used to live in NYC.... but now its all statues.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:05 PM
9

Not without a portion of the MRA group spamming Trumper non-sense and white nationalists posting the n word repeatedly with our name, just like how feminist groups get extremists posting all the time.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 03:22 PM
16

And then we'll make some progress only to have our inclusion of immoral assholes in our cause cut us out at our knees. MRA really needs to step up to the fight against these groups, especially indoctrination into extremism of young men, such as with White Nationalism. How do we expect to stop their extremism when we turn a blind eye to extremists touting our name? Nothing is more embarrassing then going to an MRA rally and seeing people with confederate flags or iron cross shirts, amongst other …
/r/MensRights31/05/17 03:21 PM
3

Because of how easily it could be abused.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:18 PM
0

You can simplify anything to fit your perspective but that doesn't make other relevant data irrelevant just because you want it to.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 03:01 PM
1

Yes relevant but incomplete and as a stand alone metric it is misleading.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 02:58 PM
2

Why would you compare unrelated indices? That doesn't make any sense and is contrary to the point of the indicies. As I've already pointed out the original comment or didn't specify what he was comparing so your example just highlights why that's important when discussing.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 02:56 PM
1

Your example is comparing a very serious complainant men have to a rather trivial exemplary indicator in women's issue. If I said the issue of male custody for the issue of female perdition in sex slavery then the only logic, and honestly moral, response would be "Those are both distinct and important issues we should solve." Do you see how your example is disingenuous?
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:34 PM
1

I'm very well educated, but even if I wasn't o would still know that the scientific method is about quantitative information and that qualitative information is. Overwhelmingly frowned upon. My comment stands on its own merits irrelevant of your offhanded rejection.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:30 PM
1

Except that example doesn't happen. Their are income requirements. Please re-read the requirements. You can't be a millionaire and claim this benefit, and there are considerations for locality. I get that your are frustrated about this practice but that doesn't give you carte blanche to make things up. That doesn't help to resolve these issues.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 07:59 PM
-1

I disagree with your analysis, and the latter half of your post is pretty messed up. Its pretty hypocritical to decide that only certain men with specific political ideologies deserve fair treatment when this sub is for the betterment of all men irrelevant of their political views. It's especially hypocritical to believe the above but reject the same unfair premise because of phenotype, for example.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 07:53 PM
0

I mean in NYC there are 1.5x as many men owned personal non-employee business (SE with no employees) even tho the labor force ratio between men and women is 53% to 47%. I really don't see how this a problem. How is this a Men's Rights issue? They're just using standard financing tactics to increase entrepreneurship in women to match their labor ratios. Am I missing something?
/r/MensRights25/05/17 07:11 PM
3

Gregorian Chanting
/r/MensRights25/05/17 07:01 PM
1

That seems wholly dependent on the intra-personal opinion of what makes quality of life better? and better than what? All males? Women outside of our country?
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:58 PM
4

Sure, there is some sexism here. Hard to say otherwise. I think part of the issue, however, is that your making it competitive against genders when the reality is there are issues, both overlapping and mutually exclusive, that male and female genders have individually. Do men have a shitty time sometimes? Sure do. Do women also have a shitty time sometimes? Yes they do as well. Our topics shouldn't be comparative, they should stand on their own merit, which they do in many cases.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:55 PM
8

Seriously there are too many posts on this sub that are just "This comment was made by a woman! Boo!" like who cares? People on all sides of everything say stupid shit. If it isn't directly tied to resolving the real issues men face, like work place fatalities or inequal custody, how is this helping? Its just belittles us in the eyes of other people. And for the record its a) its snark from her, and b) its pretty cute, and c) the concept that women "are our better half" was a philosophical idiom…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:38 PM
22

Ok, here's why shitty, no-work-done stats like this hurt our cause. For starters (and as is taught in first level economic classes) you need to contextualize statistics. This is the median pay of a small subset of elite people vs the median pay of a much, much larger subset incorporating elite and non elite people. How can we know that? Well in 2016 only 4% of CEOs in the Fortune 500 were women (Fortune) and given the price points on this median graph, its clear they were definitely involved in …
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter