TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GimmeSomeSugar Archive

View 1 post and 232 comments by GimmeSomeSugar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

GimmeSomeSugar/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:53 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
21

Interesting that they use the meme where they present themselves as... Dark Peter? Of all options. The version of Peter Parker where he conspicuously turns into a clueless bell end.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/26 02:58 PM
9

This is the challenge eventually faced by any and all social movements, given enough time; There's no gatekeeper. So, you could have someone call themselves feminist because they advocate for equal opportunities, bodily autonomy, reproductive rights and healthcare. But equally, you could have someone identify as feminist while unironically posting on social media that men should be subject to curfew (actually just suggested by a cabinet member politician in the UK) and using hashtags like #killa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 09:22 AM
9

Has Dawkins been confirmed as doing anything fucked up? My understanding was that Dawkins was one of those few names appearing in the files who Epstein tried to win over, but Dawkins wasn't interested.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/26 09:03 PM
25

A specific lesson I've learned about communication through my career is that there's always a gap between intent and understanding. Consent, specifically informed consent should be important for everyone. When the intent in someone's messaging is "consent doesn't matter in these specific circumstances", then they are offering up the possibility that some people's understanding will stretch to "consent doesn't matter (in circumstances that I can justify)". By framing rape as a thing that is done …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/25 10:37 AM
115

Misandry does indeed kill/harm In ways both subtle and gross. May I introduce Earl Silverman.. Earl escaped a violent, abusive wife but was unable to find any support resources. Only ridicule from the police and redirection to "anger management" services. "As a victim, I was re-victimized by having these services telling me that I wasn't a victim, but I was a perpetrator," Silverman told the National Post. This led him to found MASH (Men's Alternative Safe House) in the early 2000s, and "Family …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/25 07:09 AM
16

If OP (or anyone) wants to try searching for the same or similar concepts, try starting with; Survivorship bias. (The textbook example being the reporting on where bombers were taking damage, to inform where they should be adding armour.) Observation bias. Selection bias.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 01:32 PM
6

I don’t identify strongly with the label “feminist” but I’m a femme person who believes in equality. I think feminism and men's advocacy suffer the same issue. There is no gate keeper. Anyone can adopt the label. So, you have the core of the movement with ideas that are entirely reasonable. But there's nothing stopping someone coming along with very ugly ideas and claiming to be representative of the larger whole.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/25 10:29 AM
64

The black man Vs black bear feels like the obvious analogue that illustrates what is being said. And sadly, the reaction you witnessed is the same I've seen multiple times.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/24 02:39 AM
67

I offer up 2 examples: Earl Silverman: Earl Silverman was a Canadian domestic abuse survivor, activist and men's rights advocate who founded the Men's Alternative Safe House (MASH), the only privately funded domestic abuse shelter for men in Canada, and the Family of Men society, which operated phone lines to assist victims. He also served as the Canadian Liaison for the National Coalition for Men. Earl died by suicide on April 26, 2013, shortly after selling the shelter due to bankruptcy and ri…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 10:36 PM
2

Yea. Over the course of that semester we saw a variety of models. Both genders, clothed and unclothed. One older guy who was modelling was, I suspect, playing out a bit of a kink. Given that he turned up dressed like a schoolboy. Cap, blazer, shorts, knee high socks, etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 01:57 PM
8

I still remember a situation that really stuck with me. I was about 15 years old and one of the subjects I selected at college was Art & Design. We were scheduled to start doing life drawing. At the front of my mind was that concern that plagues a lot of teenage boys; will I get a boner in full view of the class when I see a naked woman? And then the classes started, and I made an observation. "Wow. This is not sexual at all". I now wonder to what degree it affects the development of teenagers t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 06:51 AM
25

Harrington points out the term is almost never defined, even by academics, and is instead used to simply “signal disapproval.” Lacking any coherent or consistent definition, the phrase now refers to any male behavior that the user disapproves of, from the tragic to the trivial. It has been blamed, among other things, for mass shootings, gang violence, rape, online trolling, climate change, the financial crisis, Brexit, the election of Donald Trump, and an unwillingness to wear a mask during the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/24 06:05 PM
12

I thought it was common knowledge (at least amongst those that would understand what's going on in the screen shot) that this is the typical MO for Russian troll farms. Sowing sociopolitical discord in areas where it's likely to get a reaction (which it clearly has, one way or another). Of course, such a bot achieves very little on its own. Which is why troll farms operate en masse.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 12:08 PM
62

Apex fallacy: The informal fallacy of evaluating a population based only on its apex, its best members. I continue to maintain that all inequality is underpinned by wealth inequality. Without recognition of that, any efforts towards addressing any particular wrongs borne of inequality hold themselves back.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/24 08:35 AM
4

I think there's a few things at play. Primarily, all inequality is underpinned by wealth inequality. (I'm a little surprised we don't see more discussion of that idea in this sub.) I don't think there's a shadowy conspiracy at play, or anything so melodramatic. George Carlin said this better than I could. You don't need formal conspiracy when the people in power all simply have convergent interests. Here in the UK, we've just had local council elections. They've demonstrated what most people sus…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/24 09:44 AM
2

WTF are you talking about? The guy went to prison.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 07:57 PM
15

Maybe we should start using Cassie Jaye as a verb. OP has Cassie Jayed herself.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 08:12 AM
3

You don't think children in poverty are worth talking about?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 11:02 AM
20

it's clear ya'll are incapable of having an honest or genuine discussion about this I asked a pretty straightforward yes/no question. Which you have not answered.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 08:48 AM
8

Are you pro-life?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:18 AM
9

Such a club has no reason for existing. It's interesting. The idea that "Men don't need a day/place/group to talk about their issues, because they're free to talk about their issues any time they choose". You only ever hear that idea from people who are attempting to shut down someone's efforts to talk about men's issues.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 09:04 PM
3

My first thought was of the 'father of an incel' post from a few weeks back. It's kind of plausible, but reads like it was deliberately written to use buzz words and push buttons.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:45 PM
20

Gender and Sexual Minorities. As I've just discovered.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:06 PM
18

There's a concept on show in her replies. I've seen it illustrated in a few different ways. One metaphor is that you never play chess with a pigeon; they'll just knock over the pieces, shit on the board, and strut around triumphantly regardless.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 01:18 AM
1

Yea, I suspect your setup is similar to what we see in the UK. I'm familiar with the gear they use in the US because I know some guys who do forestry work, and their gear is pretty similar.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 05:13 PM
3

To get an idea of the level of effort required here, you need to appreciate the climbing gear these guys are wearing. (Which you may do, sorry if I'm preaching to the choir.) Climbing a pole like this requires spurs on the feet and a harness with a safety strap you lean back on. These are the only points of contact with the pole. It's hard enough work on its own to go up and down like this. But to then sling his unconscious colleague over his shoulder before descending... Absolute heroics is rig…
/r/MensRights18/11/18 10:44 AM
70

Taken in 1967 by Rocco Morabito, this photo called “The Kiss of Life” shows a utility worker named J.D. Thompson giving mouth-to-mouth to co-worker Randall G. Champion after he went unconscious following contact with a low voltage line. They had been performing routine maintenance when Champion brushed one of the low voltage lines at the very top of the utility pole. His safety harness prevented a fall, and Thompson, who had been ascending below him, quickly reached him and performed mouth-to-mo…
/r/MensRights17/11/18 11:12 PM
6

It does. But 'how women deal with defeat' feels like we're kind of in the same ballpark as 'teach men not to rape'. The generalisation I'm referring to is generalising an entire gender.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 02:49 PM
19

Let's not generalise.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 12:54 PM
3

Fucking hell. That first guy to get knocked out, I'm pretty sure you hear his head bounce off the pavement?
/r/MensRights15/07/18 03:43 PM
9

-the Mannis
/r/MensRights26/01/18 10:37 PM
15

Yes. In some cultures that practice varying degrees of FGM, (the more non-invasive of which could reasonably be called female circumcision) some parents do justify it by saying it will make the girl more attractive to potential husbands. Hopefully, a reasonable person would see how fucked up that is. And if it's fucked up for one gender, then surely it's true for the other.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 04:43 PM
24

He said women don't want men who are uncircumcised The go to response here is to ask whether he would think that were a reasonable comment from a parent if the gender of the child were reversed.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 02:46 PM
1

Wait. Who gets the £35? You or the clinic?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:09 PM
10

That's a pretty editorialised headline. The 'blame' was based on the victim abusing his wife and kids for decades. A claim backed up by his surviving children and hospital records. Additional claims by his surviving children were that they were sexually abused. Murder is still murder in this case. Her conviction stands and she still has a criminal record. Nobody is seeking punitive action against the system which convicted her and denied her appeals. The presidential pardon means she does not ha…
/r/MensRights29/12/16 12:10 PM
10

I know a martial arts trainer who likes the idiom; When two people get into a knife fight, both lose. One right away, and the other on the way to hospital.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 09:11 PM
43

I think you're missing the obvious. The guy who filmed it, his mother said she was proud of him for filming it and helping the police at the scene, and then offered criticism of the bus marshall and sympathy for the woman. Pretty obvious where he gets it from.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 05:13 PM
175

How many times did someone ask where the kids were? They were exactly where she abandoned them to launch a violent assault on that guy. That's where the kids were.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 05:09 PM
71

every day of the year is international men's day It's odd, the phrase "every day is international men's day". It implies that men are free to discuss their issues whenever and wherever, but the only time I ever hear it is when it's being used to shut down any attempt to discuss men's issues.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 12:32 AM
11

Let's not forget Margaret Thatcher. Whether you like her politics or not, you have to be grateful for that time she was working as a research chemist and helped invent soft-serve icecream.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 08:14 AM
32

FTA: In the video, Wrixon is the blonde girl who, after exchanging words with the teen boy, appears to try and slap Johnson. That’s when things escalate quickly. The teenage boy then grabs Wrixon and slams her to the ground. What the fuck is this shit? How can they write an account that so obviously differs from the video. The same video that's posted right next to that text!
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:39 AM
843

Last time I saw this, someone suggested that maybe she doesn't clean her teeth because then they'd have white privilege too.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:42 PM
1

FTA: Tuohy wandered off clutching her drink but a huge fight began at a nearby taxi rank, during which she reached for her glass and thrust it into Mr Miller’s face twice when he was knocked out.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 05:05 PM
1

I see why you would think so, but he isn't. We typically think of glassing as being done by shoving a pint glass in someone's face.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:53 AM
2

you give up your right to privacy becoming famous. I don't think that's entirely true. I point to Kevin Spacey as an example here. Actor first, celebrity second. It's possible to be a public figure and maintain some level of privacy. Schumer is the opposite. She's getting rich by being a celebrity first, shitty comedian second.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 09:09 PM
6

True. I personally try to avoid quantifying who 'has it worse', within reason. I find it unhelpful and think it would be better to just exercise some empathy on a case by case basis. I didn't mention that in the previous comment since I didn't want it to run on too much.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 01:47 PM
35

"that's not as bad as what women go through/women have it worse, so stop complaining" If you want to try and counter this the next time you hear it, this type of logical fallacy is called the fallacy of relative privation. A.K.A. "starving kids in Africa", encountered by most people as kids when your mother tells you to eat your vegetables, because think of the... The underlying logic is that one persons problems don't matter because someone else has it worse. To follow this logic means that the…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 10:02 AM
8

I thought American Ultra was entertaining as well.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:33 AM
4

Like this.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:33 PM
5

You'd think he would get worse. Because, you know, now his head is armour plated.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:56 PM
29

Someone will lose in a knife fight. And then someone else will lose on their way to the hospital. Same guy that told me this (a part time doorman, martial arts trainer, and stunt man) told me how he simulates a knife fight. Which is a useful teaching tool, because after a few Seagal movies and a little self-defense training, lots of people wonder if they could handle it and make the wrong call in the heat of the moment. You are one on one with an opponent. You're both wearing a white, paper suit…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 05:09 PM
25

The very best self-defence system, the ancient art of Nikedo. AKA, run the fuck away.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 05:07 PM
17

So, I'm just going to throw this out there. Is there an opposite gendered sign to this from the same source? When the Northumbrian Police, led by demonstrable misandrist Vera Baird and her likeminded colleagues, over the last few months put out their badly one sided poster campaign, it rightly met with widespread derision. Shouldn't the same rule of balance apply here? Either leave out the pronouns, or refer to both genders in equal measure.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:10 AM
23

Homocide sounds like something very different.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 02:58 PM
6

It's kind of buried in the middle of the article, but she was moved there after being threatened. Implying that she wouldn't normally be getting this 'cushy' setup, had they not felt the need to segregate her from the general population. Basically, it's the Daily Mail. So I'm dubious about the entire story.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 07:32 PM
3

Rape usually has no proof And yet, so much of this alleged activity happened on film. Where is the footage? None of his accusers could scrounge up even a single, raw clip to take to the police and get him charged?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 01:12 AM
9

The arguement usually offered is that "every day is men's issues day". I believe in the recent Jess Phillips example she said there didn't need to be a debate about men's issues, because men are free to openly talk about men's issues whenever and where ever they choose. What's the context in which these statements are offered? In successfully shutting down attempts to openly discuss men's issues. It's like doublethink.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 11:22 PM
12

Thundercunt, if you will.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 07:43 PM
1

Black lipstick makes the thumbnail look like Hitler.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 07:06 PM
1

I was recently reminded on reddit of the word 'degloving'.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 10:27 PM
9

I'd love this to happen. Then I can pay women to commit all my crime for me and get away free and clear.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 08:20 AM
1

Especially the kind of tabloid that once ran the headline "Gordon Ramsay sex dwarf eaten by badger" and nobody batted an eyelid.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 08:21 PM
2

Downvoting your own comments? This guy plays reddit on hard mode.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:39 PM
13

There has been no shortage of women vocally supporting Tim Hunt. The picture painted by his supporters is one of a man who has been a tremendous ally to women in science. He has "trained and mentored some outstanding female scientists". If ever there was an example of feels > reals, this seems like it.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 06:08 PM
4

I like to double barrel it with "moist discharge".
/r/MensRights25/06/15 04:05 PM
10

I don't think that's the reason at all.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:30 PM
31

It wouldn't surprise me if many women in science don't actually give a shit, and the pressure came from other sources. As I understand it, his point wasn't even his point. He made a flippant, off the cuff comment that I am inferring he meant a little sarcastically in dismissal of the topic of women in science should be given any significant billing at an international conference. “Let me tell you about my trouble with girls. Three things happen when they are in the lab. You fall in love with the…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 10:13 AM
48

It's interesting that she tries to frame it as a violation of her being "generally used to doing whatever I want with my own body". Getting a tattoo is collaborative. You are paying an artist to do a piece for you and put it somewhere on your body. Illustrative of how much of this collaboration is the artist's is how much variation you might expect on the a piece, depending on who worked on it. When I got my tattoo I picked a guy and took him a fairly well worked out sketch. He still made it his…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 09:44 PM
15

Obviously, Mark Ruffalo needs to educate this woman about what feminism is.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:21 PM
18

a response to the (relatively) widespread anti-feminist sentiment present on reddit I see this a lot. This notion that reddit hates women. This narrative that reddit is completely dominated by white men who loathe feminism. And yet, even the most casual of scrutiny shows that the idea of a male dominated reddit is false. Chiefly male? Sure, but hardly to the extent that matches the stereotype. If it were true that widespread anti-feminist sentiment exists on reddit, how does one explain the like…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 05:50 PM
4

a response to the (relatively) widespread anti-feminist sentiment present on reddit I see this a lot. This notion that reddit hates women. This narrative that reddit is completely dominated by white men who loathe feminism. And yet, even the most casual of scrutiny shows that the idea of a male dominated reddit is false. Chiefly male? Sure, but hardly to the extent that matches the stereotype. If it were true that widespread anti-feminist sentiment exists on reddit, how does one explain the like…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 05:35 PM
1

True for really big values of 2.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 10:47 PM
2

That's not what I was asking. What I was driving at is that if she was already in the country, he's really not responsible for making sure she has the means to support herself. She's an adult and should be looking out for those things herself.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 04:01 PM
4

That being said, the article makes it sounds super shitty for the women, being in a foreign country with no money and no visa, not signing that prenup would have fucked her up good. I don't think it makes that much of a difference, but I would be interested to know how she ended up in Australia. Did she emigrate looking for a better life, and then meet him? Or did she already know him and emigrate to marry? If the latter, then the pre-nup being dropped on her a couple of days before the wedding …
/r/MensRights26/04/15 10:34 AM
19

Equity feminism (and the counter 'gender feminism') is a term specifically coined by CHS as a way of addressing how some people have co-opted the traditional label of feminism. She strongly identifies with the former.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:33 PM
43

If this was in America or Britain for example, it might rub me the wrong way. But it's Japan, where they do seem to have a problem with men rubbing ladies the wrong way.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:06 PM
37

Completely glossing over the fact that she took it public first. Harassing photography was also explicitly prohibited in the Pycon rules. I'd call tweeting a picture of two guys without their permission to 10,000 followers implicitly calling for their vilification is pretty harassing photography.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:05 AM
10

What you refer to as 'technically by definition a feminist' would be Equity Feminism. Current, mainstream feminism is represented by those who claim the label of feminist and get most media exposure. Obvious examples of both types would be Christina Hoff Somers and Anita Sarkesian, respectively.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 12:02 PM
19

I think your heart is in the right place, but you should look up both of those terms. They don't mean what you think they mean.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 11:59 AM
5

Trust, but verify.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 10:11 PM
7

He's got a day job. His website charges for subscriptions and he'll be making revenue off his Youtube videos.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 09:46 PM
4

Isn't it more so about the frustration of chasing a woman playing hard to get, because if she just went after someone she found attractive she'd get slut shamed? I hate these blurred lines I know you want it I know you want it I know you want it But you're a good girl And of course, people go nuts over the line "I know you want it", but those same people never mention what comes after it in the chorus: The way you grab me Must wanna get nasty Go ahead, get at me I think one theme of the song is …
/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:34 AM
2

Reminds me of Don't be a sucker. I see some parallels there now. People who ask you to be prejudiced will usually have something to gain.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 03:02 PM
1

At least you didn't spell it with a p.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:44 PM
6

Equity feminists.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 08:08 PM
2

Yea, history is fucking brutal that's for sure.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 08:49 PM
23

People so often forget about the millions of non-Jews killed in the Holocaust :(
/r/MensRights16/11/14 08:34 PM
8

/u/alaysian was making reference to the fact that the poster of the original '10 hours...' video (which is the only video posted on that account, an account created just before the video was posted) was explicitly soliciting donations for ihollaback.org.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:55 AM
18

Please Emma. Tell me more about how you, a person born to wealthy parents in one of the freest countries in the world, raised in another one of the freest countries in the world, given access to a privileged education, who collected great wealth doing your dream job, leaving you free to pursue higher education in yet another of the freest countries in the world without accruing any debt, believe that as a man I am duty bound to help feminism gain the traction it so badly needs to address the way…
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:57 PM
2

I'm connected to a guy on Facebook. He's your typical sort of chap who buys into modern feminism wholesale. Also happens to work in the gaming industry and does a lot of professional writing for the likes of TechCrunch and Gamasutra. Not surprisingly, a bit of that writing of late has covered #gamergate, in which he refers to those opposed to the Quinn camp or critical of Anita Sarkeesian as 'truthers' to draw an obvious parallel with the 9/11 conspiracy movement. Obviously implying that anyone …
/r/MensRights17/09/14 03:59 PM
1

Let them do the dirty work to themselves and show the world their true colors. You know? Yea. Interestingly, some research was reported on recently that would indicate that the best way to win an argument is to agree with it strongly. So, in instances like this getting someone to show more extreme examples of that radfem-like ideology may very well lead more reasonable people who were leaning that way to question their own thinking. It's like you were doing a public service really.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:43 PM
3

You might be interested in the notion of the backfire effect.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:06 PM
2

I see where you're coming from and agree in principle. If the teacher can be shown how corrosive that attitude is and develop some empathy, then everyone is better off in the long run. In reality I expect making this teacher attend 'sensitivity training' to return to work would be about as affective as making a motorist caught speeding sit through a speed awareness course to avoid a fine. They will just see it as a means to an end, coming out the other side more deeply entrenched in their opinio…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 09:27 PM
2

'Unpaid administrative leave' seems legit. Getting to come back after going through 'sensitivity training' seems pretty weak.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 08:20 PM
24

ARPAnet, the precursor to the internet. Created so that in times of nuclear crisis American military officers could still swap their favourite titty pics.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 10:09 PM
9

A nagger?
/r/PussyPass30/08/14 12:06 PM
2

Kind of. IT.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 06:50 PM
1

When you smell farts? That's gaseous poop going up your nose.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 06:50 PM
14

"Comphooters"
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:14 PM
9

1 second of physical activity which no one else is responsible for It takes a man one moment to put the seat up to pee, it takes a woman the same amount of time to put it down. The difference is that women are gravity assisted.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:04 PM
6

We do live in a particulate world, after all. There's a little bit of shit and piss on everything.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:02 PM
1

Women don't think it be like it is, but it do.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 01:23 PM
10

victim blaming Except it isn't. There is no victim to blame in a crime that has not been committed.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 10:15 PM
1

Fun fact: Weird Al doesn't need to get permission, but he does anyway as a matter of principle. Because Weird Al is an awesome dude.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 07:45 PM
24

/r/MensRights is one of, if not the best subs on reddit for self-policing members. That's nothing to be ashamed of.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 09:13 AM
3

That is correct. I've heard Patrick Stewart speak multiple times about his personal history and advocate for women's rights (especially in the context of domestic abuse), but never at the exclusion of men's rights. More to the point, in this specific image he is speaking on behalf of Amnesty International. A quick anecdotal observation: On the front page of AI's international site, only one of their headline items concerns an individual, and that individual is a man. On their UK site, three of t…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 10:43 PM
1

This is actually slightly reminiscent of the partial democracy represented by Robert Heinlein in Starship Troopers. Full citizenship is awarded to those who volunteer for Federal Service, which mostly conveys the right to vote and hold political office. Those who do not volunteer still retain 'basic' rights, such as free speech and the right to assembly. When one volunteers The Federation perform a full assessment and send a candidate where they are best suited. That could be civil service, or i…
/r/MensRights30/10/13 01:01 PM
1

It's fully retractable in 98 percent of men by the age of 19 or so -- but is also not retractable in many boys until after puberty begins.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 12:01 PM
11

Surely Twilight is the obvious example? Immortal being who has experienced hundreds of years of human history and has super powers. Of course, it's completely plausible that he will fall obsessively in love with a bland, high school attending teenager.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:41 PM
16

We're all feminist overlords now.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:53 AM
4

NOTE: The italics are accidental, they are between two *s used to mark A stars You can use the \ as an escape character. So you would type '*' as '\*' in your comment.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 10:47 PM
2

If I may ask, WTF is 'WURL STAWR'?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:41 PM
2

Bunch of sneaky weasels personally who use guilt and shame to fuck with both genders to sell their crap. I linked this further up, but here it as again. A guy who worked on the campaign has said that those 'real women' were not exactly immune from having their pictures retouched.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:17 PM
12

I usually go with "anyone who identifies as a man is a real man" or "anyone who identifies as a woman is a real woman".
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:14 PM
1

I think SuperCow's comment is more r/MR appropriate, since he's disputing the myth that only men change their behaviour and decisions in the company of attractive people of the opposite gender.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:11 PM
0

It's about making women feel comfortable with their bodies. ... by retouching their pictures just like all the others.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:08 PM
3

Enjoy being bitter and fighting a battle against rape victims. I feel bad and empathise with your trauma and the trauma of those that you care for, but that is a bullshit straw man arguement.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 04:47 PM
0

Speaking of straw men, I never said there is anything wrong with protesting the idea that a person's dress makes them more likely to be a victim. I commented myself that that attitude is 'grossly misinformed and misguided'. If that is the reason for slut walks then I think it would be enormously helpful for participants to convey that message without accusations of victim blaming. As far as rape culture, I think most participants of this sub would agree with me when I say I know enough about the…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:41 AM
2

If you want to go down that road, what about men who are raped with penetration? Most of us don't want to go down that road because that idea that there are different degrees of rape is pretty toxic and leads to suggestions like there being a threshold where a rape becomes 'legitimate'.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 09:45 AM
21

I don't think anyone has missed the point. It's great that the issue of male victims was highlighted and well accepted on this occasion, but overall many people are confused by the purpose of slut walks. They can't raise awareness that rape is bad, that awareness is already strong. They can't persuade rapists not to rape, that rot is too deep. They can't change the law to make rape illegal, that law already exists. If the point is simple community gathering to give moral support to victims, then…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 09:39 AM
8

As high as 50/50 with two players, if they continue until someone 'wins'.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:12 PM
2

I think you should read this.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 12:51 PM
7

Perhaps that certain interpretations of modern feminism are a major hindrance to equality, and before they are taught to be victims by those interpretations many little girls are just like this.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 02:21 PM
2

Gender differences in Receptivity to Sexual Offers [PDF warning].
/r/MensRights05/05/13 11:15 PM
4

To play the other side of the coin, Ramsey himself mentions that she's getting what she signed up for. Here in the UK, before his success in the States, Ramsey has been appearing on TV since the 90s and has a well earned reputation for being a prick. Winding people up and being abrasive has always been part of his shtick. Point being that if Al Murray or Dwain Chambers would have taken a swing at him things would have played out very differently for all concerned.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 01:29 AM
5

'Femsplaining' if you will.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:20 AM
1

In other news, women should not be left alone with children because they are the primary perpetrators of child abuse. Scientists theorise on how children will cope when left to fend for themselves. More at 11:00.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:31 AM
4

everyone involved in this vital community should feel welcome, safe and respected Spot on Adria. Such a shame and so frustrating then that you choose to piss all over the values which you claim to stand for.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:13 PM
3

This seems like one of those examples that illustrates how Poe's Law doesn't just apply to religion.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:32 PM
1

Sounds like an interesting challenge. Where do I sign?
/r/MensRights27/03/13 01:24 PM
48

once you can afford everything, you dont pay for anything... It's expensive being poor.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:56 PM
12

I don't think it's as simple as her trying to scrounge up a couple of grand. Maybe she wants to perpetuate the myth that it's tough succeeding as a woman in a man's world and is trying to teach her daughter some fucked up lesson about making her own way. Maybe she just wants to live vicariously through her daughter by making her out to be a little genius (who can beat the odds, because it's tough for a woman in a man's world). I think it's pretty obvious that a nine year old had nothing to do wi…
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:54 PM
7

The dongle comment was a dick joke. The fork comment was "I would fork that guys code", Where the humour is mostly that it sounds like innuendo but isn't.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:44 PM
2

But I do believe those who espouse rape culture theory would have us believe that 'rape (which only affects women) is widely tolerated'. Same again, I don't know anyone who would not be appalled by the tolerance of rape.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 10:27 AM
2

I guess it's somewhat analogous to the bystander effect (if there's a specific name for this type of situation, I don't know it). When someone acknowledges that bullies like her will feel enabled to act that way until people stand up to them, but don't want to incur the massive ballache of being one of the first and decide to leave it to someone else. Regarding a lawsuit, would he have to pay fees upfront which he would be stuck with if he lost? What are the chances he's already consulted a lawy…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:08 PM
8

I posted this in another thread on the same subject: I can kind of appreciate the position the guy is in. I'm not sure he had any real reason to apologise, but the common thinking seems to be that he has to keep himself marketable to future employers. He should pursue wrongful dismissal, but at what risk? Even if he wins there's a very real chance he will still be known in professional circles as 'that guy who got shitcanned for being sexist'. Mud sticks, and all that. At a complete guess I'd sa…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:56 AM
11

Didn't her claims of harassment turn out to be a bit shaky?
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:09 AM
3

God, I wish these homosexuals would just knock it off.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 01:27 PM
3

Outrage and titillation.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 02:11 AM
6

But even if they do not, the curious may still be here after the trolls move on.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:50 PM
1

While illustrative, I will admit to being quite taken aback when Joe Don Baker starts talking to me about circumcision around the 54 seconds mark.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 04:21 AM
3

It's natural for abuse victims to seek help from people who are not the same gender I agree with that statement, but then go on to question how much of this behaviour is nature and how much is nurture? E.g., I don't think women have any problem seeking assistance from the opposite gender in the case of other violent crime, like burglary, mugging, carjacking, etc,.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:40 PM
10

Granted, OP in the comment at the top of this chain does incorrectly attribute the opposition to feminists. All we really know from the article (which is from the Daily Mail, so I'm taking everything with a pinch of salt) is that the mentioned opposition is coming from a pro-marriage group. However, the arguement he is talking about is valid. The quote "It adds another parent to the process, and objections by just one parent can delay an adoption for years or encourage social workers to call it …
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:00 PM
5

You're focusing on the word 'dispose'. I'm not sure it means what you think it means in this context.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:19 PM
4

Ctrl+f "adoption". Four hits.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:51 PM
2

That's right. The line is delivered by Robert Downy Junior, who plays the actor Kirk Lazarus who (in the movie) got skin pigment alteration surgery to play Sergeant Lincoln Osiris in the movie within the movie. If I recall, at that point in the movie he is masquerading as a drug farmer to infiltrate a drug manufacturing operation.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 02:58 PM
25

She knows who she is. She's a dude playing a dude disguised as another dude.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 02:43 PM
8

Polygraphs would probably be counterproductive, given that they operate by detecting emotional stress. I would wager that false or otherwise, there is no shortage of emotional stress in someone making a rape accusation.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:57 PM
4

A criminal should be punished after a person receives a fair trial. I think that's a better way of wording that statement.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 02:08 PM
1

It's almost certainly FaceBook.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 02:06 PM
11

So, just the one then?
/r/MensRights27/12/12 12:38 PM
8

This is completely anecdotal, seeing as it's based almost entirely on an interesting comment chain on Reddit about this very topic. As originally delivered by two performers, it's very coy and flirtatious. A woman couldn't openly admit to being interested in sex lest she be called a whore (slut shaming always having mainly come from other women being a discussion of its own). So that line especially implying that she's looking for excuses to stay, and tomorrow she'll just say that she was drunk …
/r/MensRights26/12/12 01:44 AM
3

I think he probably should have included the sarcasm tag.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:02 PM
3

now I'm wondering what your not telling us Isn't that the very problem? That the prevailing attitude towards men is guilty until proven innocent, as far as sexual assault is concerned. That he should expect to see that look in peoples faces that says 'I wonder if he did do it'. I think this is exactly the kind of reaction he's trying to avoid, because in the real world that shit will stick to him for a long time.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 08:47 PM
4

I am pretty confident that 'so difficult' is simply the opposite of 'hell of a lot easier', certainly in the context of both full sentences respectively. So, yes you kind of did say it was difficult. If you're saying that it's not difficult to keep an uncircumcised penis clean, then why is it worth mentioning that 'advantage' when arguing for circumcision? But as I said in another comment, no one here is interested in facts What you have presented, as far as I can see, is your personal opinion. …
/r/MensRights29/11/12 04:12 PM
11

but it's a hell of a lot easier on personal hygiene What the hell were you doing before that it was so difficult to keep your intact dick clean?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:49 PM
7

Or, he's poking fun at the fact that such farcical behaviour is allowed to go on in a court of law.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:17 AM
2

My original reply said that his stats and assertions contain a lot of lies and misrepresentations, including outdated information, and that I will be working on a rebuttal to all of his stats and assertions, but in the mean time encourage anyone who isn't an idiot to look these things up themselves, and not just believe what he has written here, as many MRA are misogynists who use men's rights as a front, which is why this subreddit was mentioned on SPLC's report of misogyny on the Internet. Tha…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:51 AM
5

I like that one. I'm gonna use it.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 11:10 PM
5

There is absolutely no medical advantage of circumcision. That isn't strictly true. The pro-cut arguement usually points to the trio of studies done in Uganda, South Africa and Kenya. Those studies concluded that circumcision was effective in preventing sexually transmitted infections (especially HIV/AIDS). However, upon further scrutiny the general consensus has been that the studies as normally presented are misleading, and proper sex education and access to contraception is as (if not more so…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 09:17 PM
12

people say its harder to keep clean My retort to this is usually something along the lines of "If your standard of personal hygiene is such that you feel the need to mutilate your genitals, then maybe you've got problems that circumcision isn't going to solve". *Edit: typo.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:05 PM
1

I'd leverage the other one and fund artificial testicle research.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:40 PM
10

Thank you for taking the time to write that out. While anecdotal, I do feel like you nailed the point I was driving at witha real world example. While I was talking about young men in particular, I certainly didn't mean to imply that the same couldn't be said of young women.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 02:43 PM
21

It's a little awkward that this guy is being downvoted, since he's added something to the discussion. (I'm assuming, of course, that he's legit. Because people don't just lie on the internet, do they?) The reality is that some boys will react this way (what proportion, I couldn't say, but certainly not all). So you can see where the idea comes from, as erroneous as it may be. Sadly, I would also assume that it makes it even more difficult for young male victims who don't feel great about being r…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 10:49 AM
32

I think the key phrase is 'it starts somewhere'. So what you've described, a lot of people wouldn't call that abuse. But it is the kind of creepy, controlling behaviour which often escalates into abuse when left unchecked.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:04 PM
5

99.99% effective.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:52 PM
7

To my knowledge, there is yet to be invented a contraceptive that is 100% effective.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:03 PM
2

She looks a bit MILFy, and outrage and titillation is the Daily Mail's stock and trade.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 10:39 PM
2

Statistics matter. OK, to pick that up. Isn't it true, as heartbreaking as this is, that most rape is committed by someone known to the victim? Making it statistically improbable that just by walking around a woman is at risk of being attacked by a random stranger? Again, statistically speaking, isn't it true that men are far more likely to be the victim of violent crime?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:36 PM
21

But "every unknown stranger is a potential threat", if true for women, is equally true for men. By that logic, every person I encounter could be carrying a concealed weapon. Every person I encounter could sucker punch me to the ground and then kick me to death.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:00 AM
10

That, but more so I think the OP was trying to express the point of "WTF am I paying for everything if she has money to blow on replacing stuff that doesn't need replacing?".
/r/MensRights19/08/12 06:35 PM
8

doesn't know how to wash properly Reading the blog post comments is a bit confusing. If a person can't handle the simple task of washing their genitals regularly, then I think they might have problems that no amount of genital mutilation is going to solve.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 08:04 PM
13

Baffles me further that we still have so many non-religious people basically saying "We have to be tolerant of people's beliefs (and let them mutilate an infant's genitals)".
/r/MensRights27/06/12 12:18 PM
-2

Hence the desire to protect oneself, and specific examples of how to do so. Call a responsible adult known to the kid and let them know the deal. Likewise a gym staff member. If you feel the need to take it that far, have your phone sat on the dash on the drive home recording audio.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 11:00 AM
19

Maria is actually not a bad person This guy moved to another country to seek better opportunities to provide for his family, and she's fully prepared to throw him under a bus for her own benefit. Maybe he's a dick and deserves to be divorced, but she sounds pretty nasty either way.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 01:22 PM
2

Not at all.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 11:09 PM
18

Gender Differences in Receptivity to Sexual Offers, professors Clark & Hatfield.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 10:13 PM
6

Then confining them to their accommodation (I'm assuming they had a cabin, or something like) would seem like a reasonable course of action?
/r/MensRights04/06/12 10:07 AM
6

Does U.S. law allow for a judge to pull a lawyer to one side and ask WTF they're playing at?
/r/MensRights31/05/12 04:02 PM
2

I'm guessing it's more so her Master's degree in International Development which makes her feel like she's qualified to write such an article.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 09:41 AM
2

You seem to be typing a lot without actually saying anything...
/r/MensRights14/05/12 01:45 PM
5

I feel like it's pretty logical to assume that a single parent can do a stand up job raising their kids, but being raised by two people (and witnessing first hand how different personalities mesh) will give a child a better appreciation of how relationships work and better equip them to relate to the world at large.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 01:39 PM
32

Or they assume the nice cars is yours, but you paid for it with your profits from drug dealing.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:13 AM
6

He was probably trying to link to this image.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:41 PM
1

OK, now we're at the point where I feel like saying 'fuck you, pal'. He didn't say he doesn't want kids. He said he's not ready. You know what? Even if you interpret "I'm not ready" as "I don't want kids right now" that still means "I don't want kids". Where's your empathy? To basically say that "Oh, don't worry about it, you'll love parenthood after we force you to have children because I eventually came around and it's unthinkable that someone would feel differently than I do on the matter". Y…
/r/MensRights22/04/12 01:22 PM
3

The op gave no argument for why they wouldn't want kids. But, that's the entire point, isn't it? If someone says they don't want kids, they shouldn't have to justify that position.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 11:41 PM
2

I inferred that you did, given that otherwise your point is moot once you acknowledge that not everyone is going to find having kids a great experience.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 06:39 PM
4

Lots of people find having children tremendously rewarding. But I find it a little narrow minded to imply that those of us who choose not to be parents are in the wrong.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 04:51 PM
6

I take issue with two things. That the phrase 'man up' is used as synonym for 'responsibility', implying that the man should step into his natural role as provider whether he wants to or not. OP in that thread made it quite clear that both he and the mother have neither the desire or inclination to be parents. The point that they should face up to the consequences of an irresponsible act? The fact is that that consequence needn't be caring for an unwanted child for the next two decades. They bot…
/r/MensRights21/04/12 04:49 PM
10

Top post: Man up and deal with the situation you both created. Kind of makes me sad.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 03:24 PM
1

I have a wide variety of interests.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 02:17 PM
10

Solid advice & info. Better call Saul.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:18 AM
3

The guy did get a formal declaration of innocence, he got his son back. By the sounds of it, the guy is also out tens of thousands of dollars that he'll never recover because she declared bankruptcy. I do not hold to the idea that this woman should be left untouched because it would deter other victims from coming forward. Every criminal case should be prosecuted on evidence with a presumption of innocence until guilt is proven beyond reasonable doubt. Alas, that is not always the case. This als…
/r/MensRights09/04/12 04:06 PM
10

Perhaps more to the point is that even if you are unclear as to what 'dog pile' means (as I am, I believe it's an American football term?), why would you jump straight to rape? Even if the demon was addressing the female character, there seems to be a very strong inference of rape by these readers where it was only weakly implied at most.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 12:09 AM
2

Yes, as am I. You know what I do when I'm in crossing the road in a foreign country? I look in the direction the traffic comes from.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 01:37 PM
3

As I understand it, she walked into a street looking in the wrong direction for oncoming traffic. That seems like a pretty fucking stupid thing to do, and if the media were to portray me as such in that situation, I would take my licks and move on with my life.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 11:23 AM
3

A fuller context of that quote is: All domestic abuse in which the provisional victim does not leave after the first incident of violence means that two people, and not just one person, are responsible for the continuation and maintenance of that violent relationship. To presume that woman in such situations are powerless to extricate themselves is to cast for them the role of a child – for an adult woman in an adult relationship. To be sure, here are men who abuse their spouses, but to imagine …
/r/MensRights19/03/12 03:41 PM
4

What Limbaugh, the Republican party, and the religious right are doing to women is reprehensible, so target that. I would rather focus on the fact that these are disgusting people who wield a lot of influence. Instead of what a lot of people seem to be doing which is picking up the women's issues and letting the rest fall on the backburner.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:20 PM
18

It is reasonable to expect couples to talk about birth control. It is not reasonable to mandate that they do.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:18 PM
1

I see a couple of flaws there, but that is an interesting component of this idea, of which I was not previously aware of. Thanks for linking it.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 03:04 PM
13

Gender Differences in Receptivity to Sexual Offers [PDF link].
/r/MensRights07/03/12 01:47 AM
3

The MRA movement, right now, has an issue with credibility. That is not likely to change as long as advocates are identifying with a right wing rag like The Daily Mail who have a demonstrable habit of just making shit up.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 01:18 PM
7

I wish people would stop posting links to The Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 10:49 AM
0

Wouldn't the likelihood be that if the police decided not to proceed with a prosecution of rape against the alleged attacker, they would immediately be in a position to make a call on whether to pursue a case of false accusation? E.g., before there is proof of guilt, the investigation should be concerned primarily with establishing facts and what actually happened?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 01:10 PM
1

And then sometimes, some redditors will down vote things automatically as well.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 04:11 AM
21

He's giving other examples of how men are looked upon with suspicion by some, in any situation?
/r/MensRights22/02/12 11:17 PM
14

Marisa Santoro is a single working mother, IT executive and professional speaker in corporate America. Her geeky childhood love for computer programming led her to a successful career at a Wall Street brokerage. She has a natural instinct for ‘picking up’ brilliant women who juggle it ALL. For fuck's sake...
/r/MensRights20/01/12 05:45 PM
5

Except instead of crying tears you shoot the cop in the face. With AIDS.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 02:40 AM
2

some of them were a bit silly but action-packed and had a message at the end You know those shows were made just to sell us toys? That the great trick of Saturday morning television from the 80s onward was that it was thinly veiled advertising to which we presented ourselves as a captive audience. The only reason each had the de facto 'message at the end' was to meet Saturday morning broadcast regulations at the time.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 02:04 PM
2

I'm thankful I wasn't inundated with drivel when I was a child and there were plenty of children's shows catering to boys' interests that didn't dumb you down. Care to mention any examples of those shows?
/r/MensRights30/12/11 03:27 AM
2

It does seem to be a particularly special kind of self-loathing that the likes of Cosmo try to program into us.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 11:40 AM
3

'Lad' is an English slang term meaning young man or boy. Often 'lad' is used to refer to a particular type of young man who likes to get his drink on and read magazines like Nuts or Loaded, which are probably the two most prime examples of Lad's mags on the shelf right now.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 12:50 AM
2

I'm no aviation expert and everything the Daily Mail prints should obviously be taken with a pinch of salt, but more than once a reference is made to the rule that a normal small aircraft pilot should never let passengers embark or disembark while the propeller is still running. I imagine there's very good reason for that rule to exist. On another note, it is the Daily Mail, so of course they go to some lengths to let us know how good looking Lauren was before-hand, so we know how much of an esp…
/r/MensRights06/12/11 01:14 PM
1

If you look at the IMDB page for Scum one of the plot keywords is 'Male rape' because that was a pivotal plot point in the movie. Obviously, that is completely anecdotal, but I think that something like that seeming plausible for a young offenders institute in the UK, let alone an adult prison, goes to the point that prison rape is certainly not just an American thing.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 11:36 PM
-1

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 07:57 PM
25

Perhaps implying that despite society's apparent sometime opinion to the contrary, men can and do make fabulous parents.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 01:02 AM
27

In a perfect world, women and men would have similar sex drives and men wouldn't feel any desire to use porn to satiate their desires. No, because masturbation and sex are not the same thing. Someone who has a healthy sex life may still feel the urge to masturbate and should not feel guilty about it. When people say one is a substitute for the other I have images spring to mind of barely post-pubescent boys boasting "I don't need to jack off, I have a girlfriend", for him the penny has not yet d…
/r/MensRights06/10/11 11:39 PM
2

I think you mean 'buy'.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 06:34 PM
10

Probably not. Much more likely the point of this particular comic is that social interaction is a nuanced act that sounds creepy as fuck if you explicitly state your literal intent.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 05:46 PM
4

By OP in the other thread: Edit: Didn't expect to see so many child abuse stories in here. My intention was not for you guys to dig up some bad memories. I meant "fucked up" in a different way, but my mistake. I think that's indicative of a major problem. Somehow, mutilating your kid's genitals is completely acceptable and is in no way abuse because, you know, loads of people have been doing it for ages.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 12:40 PM
4

No, you shut up!
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:49 PM
10

I kind of stick to that rule, but... I often stop myself from downvoting something just because I don't agree with it. But then if someone takes a contrary standpoint with no basis to back it up I'll happily see that downvoted to oblivion.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 01:45 PM
6

But when they're dead, they're just hookers.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 11:17 PM
6

Basically, shouldn't "10 reasons you should rethink infant circumcision" read: 1. Circumcision involves mangling your newborn's cock with a blade. Seriously, WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU? 2. - 10. See number 1.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 10:57 PM
55

Or invite the best sandwich maker to make the sandwiches, whoever that may be.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 02:07 PM
10

I think the point was that his behaviour is 'merely' detrimental, not that it is destructive to the point of permanence.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 02:05 PM
-1

In this context, I do not think that word means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 04:48 PM
10

Should we assume that when cheap, easy and reliable screening for cancer becomes available that such resources should be banned? Because, you know, someone would be quite upset to discover that they have cancer.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 07:04 PM
1

Every time I see this type of story. This time I am not disappoint.
/r/MensRights15/01/11 06:12 AM
3

And if he isn't already haunting your dreams, these photos of his Christmas activities may help. Oh God, what heinous shit have they caught Julian in the middle of? 'Le click' - Ah, I see. His heinous activities involve him hanging around his house, chilling at Christmas... Ah FFS, they also do that thing where they inject 'Read more...' URLs into your copy to paste.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 03:09 PM
7

Any source other than the Mail or a direct link to the study referenced?
/r/MensRights12/10/10 12:18 PM
18

Maybe the older guys weren't so much being chivalrous as they were being pragmatic? They didn't want to get trampled by these crazy bitches, but they don't want to detain anybody inside, so the obvious thing to do is to get them out first so they're out of the way. Kudos to the ladies & gentlemen who acted like rational human beings and didn't try ensure their own safety by trampling over other people.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 02:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter