TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Gimme_The_Loot Archive

View 10 posts and 127 comments by Gimme_The_Loot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Well she is rich and about to be single soooo.....
/r/MensRights13/01/22 03:15 AM
-5

Not sure why he's being so down voted and you're being up voted for this interaction. As I know it what you're referring to is that if the child benefits from government support it's a requirement the non custodial parent pays CS. How does that discount what op said that if one party is paying CS the other parent is custodial?
/r/MensRights24/11/21 12:27 PM
1

Care about the people? No. Not want to spend their money when they can make you spend yours?? DEFINITELY
/r/MensRights19/10/21 02:57 PM
-16

Tbf it isn't about the woman it's more about the state/government as an entity. A woman could say I don't want anything from this guy but in order to receive any type of supplemental assistance from the government they require the father to be contributing through child support. The government's POV is that it took two parents to make the child and they're not going to contribute if you're not going to contribute. Their goal (the government) becomes based on "what's best for the child" and not w…
/r/MensRights18/10/21 09:18 PM
15

A SHARPENED stick?! A luxury! In my day all we had to fight using the the arms of our dead brothers as weapons! One time I lost both my eyes and had to fight blind until I took some extras from a passing chicken!
/r/MensRights14/10/21 09:28 PM
23

Definitely a noticable part of this statement
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:32 PM
2

Haha yea on Reddit I'm never sure but I figure it's better to put it out there and have it be not applicable than not rolling the dice on it :) Thanks for adding the link to your comment too brother. The solution is going to take all of us 🙏🙏
/r/MensRights28/07/21 02:26 PM
3

Hey not sure if you're US based but if so we're currently facing an incredible opportunity in carbon pricing. The CCL is pushing to have it included in this year's budget reconciliation, meaning it could NOT be blocked by the filibuster. This goes to vote very soon though so we're asking everyone we know who has even a smidge of concern about climate change to contact their representatives to let them know that this is important. On our site here we have a super easy to use resource to find and …
/r/MensRights28/07/21 11:55 AM
2

To be clear though, the linked case is also ~15 years old. Those docs are dated 1996, it says the child was born in 95. While I disagree with the decision is it something there are recent examples of as well?
/r/MensRights18/07/21 12:13 PM
2

I think it's fair to recognize Andy Dick as the catalyst but by all means I think they're both at fault here. If anything I think more blame is typically placed on him simply bc he's famous and she isn't. He's Andy Dick, she's Phil Hartman's wife. That he's a celebrity is definitely the thing that drives his notoriety of the story. If he'd just been some guy who knew she had a drug problem, gave her drugs and the rest is what it was we probably wouldn't even know his name. He'd just be that dick…
/r/MensRights29/05/21 03:19 AM
10

I think it's fair to blame both. If someone takes your friend out drinking, then let's them drive home and they get into an accident killing someone you'd blame the driver but also the person who took them out drinking and let them drive drunk.
/r/MensRights28/05/21 03:49 PM
7

Sorry I was agreeing with you lol that was meant to support your argument. I meant the comment you were responding to was dumb af
/r/MensRights08/04/21 09:34 PM
10

Right that's the dumbest fuckin statement ever. In the US black youth incarceration is 433/100k compared to white is 83/100k. Since 2001 racial disparity in youth incarceration grew by 22%. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/black-disparities-youth-incarceration/
/r/MensRights08/04/21 09:25 PM
24

This is the right answer. Document and verify.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 12:18 AM
3

I recommend The Heartless Stone for anyone who wants to know more about why the diamond industry is the biggest bs there is and De Beers is one of the worst companies that the world has ever had (although there are so many good options for that title). And a funny fact he actually had TWO countries named after him as there was a North-Western Rhodesia and North-Eastern Rhodesia which were separate territories initially. Pretty sure he's the only private citizen in history to be able to say that.
/r/MensRights07/02/21 09:22 PM
39

That's not worse than "aware and encouraging her" for example
/r/MensRights31/10/20 11:44 PM
11

I think that's one of the most interesting things about the internet, it's exposed us to how much talent exists that we'd never have been aware of otherwise. Back in the day you probably had a funny guy who lived in the neighborhood, now I can watch videos that are absolutely hilarious from some rando on the other side of the world.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:52 PM
-14

While I agree with Bull Birr and have been a fan of his for a while my understanding about "the right to work" was that women weren't allowed to work and bc of this were basically subservient to their husbands due to financial necessity. If they "left" a husband they'd be destitute and ruined. The "right to work" was more about the capability for independence not "I'm bored doing housekeeping and want to do something else".
/r/MensRights12/10/20 03:12 AM
9

Do it! (Lil John voice) Oh-kaaaaaay
/r/MensRights17/09/20 06:52 PM
1

Game the AI by demonstrating the qualities necessary to not commit additional crimes? Sounds like a win? Like like "gaming the system" by getting a good job and paying off your bills.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 12:53 PM
7

Actually in "Talking to Strangers" they showed a study where they compared the results of judges / AI selection of (iirc) who should shouldn't get bail and which group more accurately was able to guess the defendants who would end up committing another crime (basically if they agreed to bail and the party did commit a crime it was a -1 if they didnt a +1 kinda thing). Overall the defendants given bail by the human judge were far more likely to end up committing another crime while on bail than t…
/r/MensRights04/08/20 02:22 AM
0

Be that as it may we can't deny that it does exist as well
/r/MensRights11/07/20 07:53 PM
2

Tbf men play into it too. For many men an attractive woman is part of "success". When you've made money and live a lifestyle people would like to live you basically have an opportunity to say I want what you offer (being an attractive woman) and you want what I offer (a wealthy / comfortable lifestyle). There's a reason why women have the capability to be golddiggers, people who trap / set someone up not withstanding.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 07:11 PM
17

Reminds me of that facepalm of someone asking for anti-vax medical sources bc all the medical references she can find are pro-vax
/r/MensRights09/05/20 05:08 PM
3

No argument. And 7mm is insane. My point was just that there's no reason to downplay what the situation was, even in that light the ruling was extreme
/r/MensRights19/04/20 08:33 PM
1

No argument about that
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:23 PM
12

Definitely not 7mm but I think downplaying his actions also hurts the conversation. There's enough wrong in the world that we don't need to manufacture reasons to be upset
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:19 PM
53

While I think 7MM is unreasonable we should acknowledge he did more than just "simply grab her butt" according to the article: In May 2015, while the show was filming in Chicago, Rainey and Taylor went on an off-camera date in apparent violation of the competition rules. Taylor took Rainey to a suburban sports bar, and at one point during the evening, they were on an elevated stage in full view of club patrons. With a stage light shining on them, Taylor lifted Rainey’s skirt and grabbed her bare…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:25 PM
9

Yea maybe I should have given more context there. Basically one of the things we were talking abt was if I can so clearly financially provide more stability and opportunities for her (and WANTED her to live w me) why wouldn't the court factor that into their decision - bc it's not illegal for her to be poor. Overall I agree it's a marathon. My POV on it is as long as I always do what I think is right, even if it sucks for me sometimes, hopefully when she's older she'll recognize it and know I di…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:25 PM
13

I pay hefty child support and while I know without a doubt it's not all spend on my daughter I try to think of it as reimbursement for other money that was spend on my daughter. But at the same time it's hard to feel comfortable with it when I pay more I'm support annually than she makes at her job. As my lawyer put it "it's not illegal to be poor".
/r/MensRights06/04/20 03:22 PM
1

Bc we don't live in most of human history or another country. Context is important, thus why I feel that way. Keep in mind I'm not talking abt idealized theoreticals, I'm talking about what is likely actually doable. We also use vaccines and fly in planes. Consider this for a sec, many people feel very strongly about the idea of "welfare queens who abuse the system". But no matter how hard people have tried they didn't get welfare removed, maybe made it bit harder but didn't pull the plug. And t…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 02:43 AM
-1

I get what you're saying, and in the arena of equality I agree on theory, but they're not 1:1. For example there are far more concerns that you can bring up about abortions, like is op against it always or only in situations of "bad decisions"? What about health ones etc? But also sorry I think it's totally unrealistic to say "we can just stop having the burden placed on the government". You're going to vote on the "I'd rather those kids starve than get any of my tax dollars" ballot? It's going …
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:09 AM
1

Here's the problem with that argument: Abortion is banned in many places. Do they have large movements fighting for all inclusive reproductive rights? Nope. The argument against men being able to absolve themselves is a financial one, which is different than the grounds for female reproductive rights. Men can't absolve themselves bc it would mean the govt prob being on the hook for way more $$ when single moms can't support the kids. Like I said in the start removing all reproductive rights hurt…
/r/MensRights25/02/20 11:10 PM
-7

Sorry man but this is a terrible position to take. Keep in mind if your overall goal is saddle less men with unwanted child rearing by blocking abortions you will force more people into that very situation. These many of these abortions are likely to couples who won't last / didn't plan to stay together etc, leading to... more people dealing with custody / support / etc. Even if you want to view abortions from a male-centric perspective blocking them causes harm to your group of stakeholders.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 04:11 PM
2

I appreciate that, and I think it just reenforces that it is next to impossibly hard to accomplish that goal.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 04:14 PM
2

As a father who did not get custody, has been shit on by courts at every concievable point along the way all the while being objectively more suited to provide a better life for our daughter in every possible category your comment is a perfect example of the rediculous extreme it takes to actually get custody. Saying it's as simple as determination and the long game with a little luck sprinkled in honestly feels like a slap in the face to everyone who's burnt through savings on lawyers and spent…
/r/MensRights17/01/20 01:01 PM
15

Kinda reminds me of how the new Aladdin was changed where the central theme of the movie was not "the laws state who the princess can marry" to "the laws state that the princess cannot be sultan herself"
/r/MensRights21/09/19 09:54 AM
1

Hot dog water
/r/MensRights03/08/19 11:40 AM
8

When this article was originally posted on r/news I made a comment about it that just bc she said it was rape doesn't necessarily mean it was and I got ragged on pretty hard. https://imgur.com/gallery/7e5gTxG
/r/MensRights29/07/19 01:58 AM
13

My understanding of the overall concept isn't that its an exact 1:3/4 ratio dollar for dollar but the in the big picture women in similar roles end up making less, but this is heavily due to lack of position advancement due to life decisions ex: being passed up for that promotion due to taking time off for having a child. I've read in general men have a higher risk tolerance and are willing to take more dangerous roles which pay better. One example of this, and I'm not advocating for this, is th…
/r/MensRights12/07/19 12:37 AM
2

Right, I'm not staying I agree with the answer just that that's how I understand the equation. I think regards to your point above that probably circles back to that one the child exists it exists. If a parent is willing to abandon the child then the alternative is probably killing it if they cannot, something we've seen plenty of times. I agree, in theory then the father should have the option to take the kid instead and be paid child support instead though (and maybe they are? I don't know eno…
/r/MensRights30/05/19 08:41 PM
20

The answer is bc the government wants to pay out as little as possible. Therefore once a child is born the chances of a single earning household needing some kind of support is much higher than a single earner plus child support. If the second parent is forced to pay the amount the government puts out will likely be reduced, or potentially removed. EOD it's just economics.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 12:13 PM
1

I'd agree one of things most people leave out is that a successful relationship takes work. People just expect to meet someone they love and be happy but working with another person in life takes actual work from all parties involved. When I was younger I used to scoff at things like therapy but I've come to really appreciate that most people are never really taught (myself very much included) how to properly and productively process emotion and communicate with other people to make sure you're …
/r/MensRights19/05/19 04:59 PM
39

This is kinda a side point to build off that but a lot of people prop up the Jim / Pam relationship as something really beautiful but if you step back and placed these people into the world around you youd think they were both assholes. You have a woman who's unhappy in her relationship who's too weak to really do anything about it emotionally (and eventually physically to a degree) cheating on her bf / fiance. On the other side you have a guy who works with both members of the couple frequently…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:03 PM
1

And it went to the male friend. And the high five was from another one of her friends, not some random person. Cmonnnn man
/r/MensRights21/04/19 11:59 AM
1

This is actually some really quality Photoshopping. Just enough that you don't quite know what's different at first but you can tell something is
/r/MensRights20/04/19 12:13 PM
2

Ah, sorry guess I was mistaken. Thanks for the clarification!
/r/MensRights27/03/19 02:18 PM
7

I read in FL you're not allowed to disclose the names of people arrested for crimes which is why you get the headline "Florida man does XYZ"
/r/MensRights27/03/19 12:19 PM
30

Just thought this was interesting as here in the US false or unsubstantiated claims of sexual misconduct can really damage someone's reputation / career / life. Edit: Thanks to (I assume) the mod who assigned flair to the post!
/r/MensRights27/03/19 11:52 AM
2

🤣🤣
/r/MensRights25/02/19 01:36 PM
2

🤣🤣 Many animals use that defense in nature!
/r/MensRights25/02/19 01:32 PM
5

I'd say Ripley in general from #1 & #2 is pretty much the pinnacle of solid powerful female lead. Strong character who's gender is totally irrelevant to her storyline. That she's a woman is never used (that I can remember) as a crutch or excuse or anything outside just part of who she is as she goes through the story. Definitely the kind of character I'd want my daughter to emulate.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 01:28 PM
6

A good one of these in execution is Pvt Vasquez from Aliens. She's just an all out bad ass, holds her own in the banter btwn the Marines and dies noble-y w Pvt Hudson (spoiler? Lol). A great character not built on putting down ppl around her.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 01:19 PM
22

I can only speak from personal experience but I would have to disagree with you. My experience has shown that the threshold that needs to be crossed for the court to change custody is far beyond anything you would expect. In every conceivable metric I can provide a better life to my daughter if I had custody yet the court still said no to me. My lawyer basically said to me I'd love for you to keep trying and keep paying me but frankly short of there being clear outright abuse nothing was going t…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 09:49 PM
2

Oh I'm not saying the situations are 1:1. Just that there are some redic payments going on out there
/r/MensRights03/02/19 01:38 PM
5

Iirc I remember reading Arod pays around 115k/month
/r/MensRights03/02/19 01:11 PM
3

There was a great article a while back on a BJJ blog talking about the idea of "can technique beat strength" an one of the examples he used to show the extreme of it was saying that no BJJ player in the history of the sport would ever be able to tap out a gorilla. The gorilla is pure power and your technique means nothing. While that's extreme you then normalize it a bit and say an incredible 145 pounder will likely have a similar problem against an untrained athletic 250 pound opponent
/r/MensRights06/01/19 02:24 PM
6

I play some judo a good amount of BJJ and we had someone come to the gym who's played college football. Big dude obviously very athletic. I'm in pretty good shape but he frankly manhandled me. My technique meant little when he should just stand up out my holds and literally shake me off.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 02:06 PM
6

I remember from a sociology class there are actually more suicides in the spring than the winter holidays. They attributed it to at least in the winter everyone is huddled inside so it's not so in your face but when the weather is nice everywhere you look are (what you'd consider) happy people enjoying their lives
/r/MensRights25/12/18 06:33 PM
4

I would say an even stronger comparison would be woman saying they're not interested in a guy with a small dick. That's a physical characteristic out of your control (women could get breast / butt implants if they really want), is frequently mocked in movies / entertainment, is like the go to insult for an angry girl (well you got a small dick!) and no one would blink if a girl said she wasn't attracted to.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 05:03 PM
21

Thank you sir may I have another!!
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:31 PM
1

Iirc the Mongols had fighting women as well
/r/MensRights15/09/18 01:19 PM
85

Right. "The case will now proceed to discovery..." means it's being heard but no ruling has been made. I guess it's a step in the right direction but doesn't produce anything tangible as far as I can tell.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 03:14 PM
1

Always wanting credit for some shit you supposed to do
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:46 AM
1

Thank you for the input. My understanding of the situation (and I could be wrong) was that the bunk bed issue had to do with that they we're in the living room / kitchen area (it's all one big open space with no separation) which he didn't want. I don't know if it was due to that they were bunk beds specifically or maybe just having beds in that room at all, as now they have a pull out couch and the mattress is against the wall during the day so maybe they can say that there is technically no "b…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 11:40 AM
1

That would be great I appreciate the effort. Thanks in advance, even if you don't reach her.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 10:47 PM
9

The reason (imo) why this would never happen is the financial liability for the government is too high. I can only speak for the US system that I'm familiar with but the probability that a single parent getting no form of financial support from the other parent may need financial assistance from the government is going to be much, much high than if they were. For example I've had friends who had out of court agreements with their ex's, just like hey I'll give you $X every week but this way it's …
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:52 PM
9

I'll check my index but I think that's worth -2
/r/MensRights01/02/18 12:20 PM
29

In most every video in r/streetfights when someone tries to break up a fight they end up getting their ass kicked too
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:17 PM
8

All really great input thank you. I really liked that last line too. Poetic and accurate.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 08:42 PM
6

Happy to admit if I'm wrong. Updated my comment to say that I may be!
/r/MensRights08/11/17 06:04 PM
183

The reason I've heard was they only protected assets pre-marriage. So if you married while on your way up the ladder and saw a lot of success after being married (as many would in their 20s-30s) the assets generated post-marriage would still be up for grabs. Also I've heard of judges just throwing them out anyway. Edit: User below says I'm incorrect. I'm in no way a lawyer and my reply was annecdotal. If I'm wrong happy to admit that all day every day. If anyone is a lawyer and can weigh in plea…
/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:14 PM
20

First thing I thought while reading it too, outside of the ones which are obvious (don't be afraid to try something new!).
/r/MensRights08/11/17 01:00 PM
9

This is also why I could see it be more frequent coming from a woman. For ex if my friends chihuahua bit my leg I'd be annoyed and maybe kinda pissed at my friend but prob won't get too crazy. His pitbull goes in on my leg it's getting put down.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 01:02 AM
168

Lost their scholarships and were suspended from their team. Basically a pretty good chance she wrecked any potential football careers unless both those points are completely reversed. Funny that in the article there's also no mention of what became of the guys following her lie coming to light.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 03:17 PM
7

Days are long but those damn years are quick.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 05:22 PM
1

Yes I'd agree the entire conversation is much broader than these points. We also don't know what people are willing to accept vs what they truly want deep down in their mind and may end up nagging at them late at night / after their girlfriends or co-workers were talking. All I was saying is the 22% stat here doesn't sound too bad to me. Maybe not perfect or ideal but probably a lot better than it was in the recent past.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:19 PM
4

Yea also not trying to stir anything but honestly I don't consider 22% an incredible number. You'll probably always find 1 in 5 people who are totally pieces of shit but when you look at the inverse of the statistic, 4 out of 5 women would be fine dating someone who makes less than them, it doesn't seem so troubling. If you did surveys of men you could probably find 22% who agreed on some terrible shot for women also.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 11:54 AM
1

Can't upvote this enough
/r/MensRights10/12/16 07:47 PM
5

Lol I'd imagine being at his wedding giving a speech like "Thank God you found an 8 to settle down with bc I really thought you were going to go to the grave with a negative record."
/r/MensRights03/09/16 06:41 PM
15

So when someone is horrific do you get into negative numbers? Damnnnn dude went home with a -7 last night. He was druuunk
/r/MensRights03/09/16 11:58 AM
22

That's what I was thinking reading this. She basically did go public about it if she told people and it got published in NY Times.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 11:36 AM
2

That was a 5 star comment. Out of fairness I give it 3.95 stars.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 04:40 PM
2

Yea definitely. Especially when they're young that's where they're tied to friends and familiarity
/r/MensRights08/04/16 08:51 PM
2

One issue I could see here is the logistics especially in relation to school etc. I knew someone growing up who had a situation like this but his parents literally lived across the street from each other. If he needed books or clothing or something he could just walk over and get it. I could see if there is a big travel time between the two (I live about an 1.5-2 hrs away from my daughters mom) and in our situation a true 50/50 would be very difficult to execute.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 08:07 PM
1

Good point
/r/MensRights05/04/16 10:27 PM
2

If I remember right from my ju jitsu the value in the rear naked comes from not compressing the larynx but rather but applying pressure on either sides of the neck to prevent blood flow to the brain causing a shutdown.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 09:44 PM
1

You seem like a funny but stand up guy. Have some upvotes.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 09:42 PM
1

Umm ok. I think that was supposed to be an insult but I can't really tell. In a world where we're all Tony Jaa then yes we'll all win every fight and never back down. In the real world some of us know when it's better to play smart.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 06:43 PM
1

Again I don't disagree that you should stand up for yourself. All I'm saying is it doesn't necessarily mean that you're 100% good to go from there on out. And of course everyone's situation is different but also based on this comment it sounds like you know your way around a fight pretty well: So I taught his friends a lesson one by one the day after. Keep in mind thats not everyone. Not everyone will be able to fight off their bully, then fight off the bully's friends when they all show up too,…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 05:36 PM
3

I think the best thing for him here is that it looked like he knew HOW to fight too. People don't like it when they don't know what to expect. I said this below too but I did have an experience like this where fighting back just led to the kid trying to jump me with his friends a day later bc he couldnt have it known that he wasn't able to kick my ass originally. Again I do think people should defend themselves and I think it's important to stand up for yourself but I don't think that it's a 100…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 03:22 PM
1

Maybe. Maybe not. In counter to your statement I have fought back against bully's before. I'd say there are some parallels to this also except I live in the city so there was no bus like this. Basically was getting messed with by one kid. I fight back and people see it. A day later and for some time after him and his friends come after me. People had been getting at him for being a tough guy who couldn't kick the ass of a scrawny white kid so he and his friends wanted to make a point. It wasn't …
/r/MensRights05/04/16 03:13 PM
32

Agreed. It looks like they're both shitheads and the brother wasnt doing anything when it looked like she was winning bc there was no need. Once SHE was getting her ass kicked he jumped in. Pretty standard. I feel for that kid though. They probably mess with him a lot if this girl is comfortable standing over him slapping and kicking him and honestly I don't see this making it any better for him in the long run.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:28 AM
2

One piece of contrast I want to put out there though is my experience going for custody last year. On paper if you look at any objective metric anyone would say I'm better suited to provide a good home. I earn more, live in a better neighborhood, am better educated, have no other kids so I can spend more time with her, etc etc. The only pros her mom has are that my daughter has always lived with her and her mom has other kids (not mine) so they don't like to separate siblings. Neither of these a…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 03:38 PM
5

From how it sounds probably both. Person had Mohawk, other person made classic 90s movie reference and hilarity ensued. Wait, no I think I got that wrong...
/r/MensRights24/01/16 02:28 PM
4

I think that's the best point here. He's a very good orator / debater and it feels like her ability to respond to points is far weaker than his. While I do agree with a lot that he says I could also thinks of devils advocate stances while watching while she just sat there and lip smacked (given I'm at home with zero pressure so I'll also just keep saying I could have gotten the TD from my comfortable couch).
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:47 PM
10

I'm used to getting laid 3x a week wheres my standard of living? Paraphrased from Chris Rock iirc
/r/MensRights18/11/15 12:35 PM
7

Exactly. I feel for the guy but at the same time knowing the deck is stacked against you means playing smart and not doing stuff which will fuck you over in the long run. I hate always having to be the bigger person in arguments and always having to contain my emotions while her mom goes ham but I have so much more to lose by doing so little. My cousin in an argument with his ex wife threw a handful of bills and change at her (something along the lines of "you want my money? Here take it!") and …
/r/MensRights11/11/15 02:49 AM
18

From my understanding of the situation, and I'm no lawyer but someone who deals with visitation, when she tried to prevent him entering and from seeing his daughter (if the time he was trying to see her was based on a court order) was he should have called the police and said she was violating a court order to try and get the daughter turned over to him. It probably wouldn't work in that situation but then might lead to seeing a new judge with more things in his favor to get better terms. I've a…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:43 AM
2

From the comments of that article here's a great one by a lawyer talking about the inconsistencies in age consent overlaps (16v18) and the horrors it can cause people. Its a long comment so won't paste it in full here but its definitely worth a read by all: Http://Np.reddit.com/r/news/comments/3jf88n/teens_who_take_nude_selfie_photos_face_adult_sex/cuozwj0
/r/MensRights03/09/15 11:52 AM
2

Reminds me of that article a few weeks back where this woman was complaining about being sent home from Macy's(?) after coming in wearing shorts shed bought in their "career" section. The part glossed over was that their employee dress code prohibits shorts in general and the length was irrelevant.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 12:27 PM
5

Ala why I write this from my apartment and not from my mansion bought by my millions earned in the NFL
/r/MensRights23/07/15 12:01 PM
2

I just want to throw out there that while you make the technical distinction I can here in NYC our local "jail" would be Rikers Island and as a non-violent offender you are not going to enjoy your time there (not that violent offenders do). The degree of violence that occurs there is VERY high and if you were just a normal guy being thrown in jail for not being able to pay support you will be ill prepared for what comes next. I do not think that is a comperable punishment for the crime.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:07 PM
1

Maybe but that's a pretty pessimistic approach. My kid comes to me and goes I want to be a doctor I'm not going to say Maybe, but probably not. But sure, you never know where they may go. I bet every parent murdered by their kids never thought that was going to happen. Either way to circle back my point was simply while I can align with some things he said the overall tone of it is a little too much for me. That kind of comes across to me like a throwing out the baby w bathwater.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:50 PM
7

While I can say I fear some of the legal repercussions I think there's an extremity to his position I can't connect with. For example I like kids, he seems to see them as an unnecessary burden men are tricked into having. Raising children is an opportunity to shape a human who may be able impact the world. I feel like at the end of the day a position like this may preach to people who feel exactly like that but would drive away anyone who's moderate / interested and harden people who oppose.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:26 AM
1

Thanks. Should have guessed that was a thing
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:16 PM
1

Funny, I call mine Alexander the Gape
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:39 AM
1

Thanks for the input. Appreciate it man
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:56 AM
1

I don't have custody only visitation rights. When I originally petitioned the court it was deemed since we were on poor terms the custodial parent got full legal custody so in situations like medical or educational where a decision had to be made and if the parties wouldn't be in agreement someone would have to be able make the final call. I'm going to scour the agreement again and I know it says something about I have to be informed if she's taken out of state I want tto be sure I can prevent h…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:42 AM
1

Should have thought to check Wikipedia. They got everything! Thanks man
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:26 PM
1

Good feedback. Thanks!
/r/MensRights10/11/13 10:02 PM
1

And side question but aren't you a mod? Based on your above comment starting with "obviously we are doing our job..." I had assumed you were.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 09:44 PM
1

I thought it would make sense to have that being that I was basing my question off an article thus context was needed, no?
/r/MensRights10/11/13 09:42 PM
1

All fair answers. I appreciate your trying to move forward the conversation in a productive manner :)
/r/MensRights10/11/13 06:20 PM
1

Can I ask this then? Being that there appears to be some interest in the general conversation about if men should have some kind of legal recourse or decision making option past the point of ejaculation and it seems difficult to word the question in a way allowable can you lead from the front and help word the question in a non-bias, open ended question which will allow the larger community to weigh in with their opinions? I ask in no way simply to try and encourage an in-thread argument but rat…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 05:01 PM
0

Crazy. My wording was definitely not biased or soap box-y in anyway but rather a legitimate open way to discuss the topic.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:40 PM
2

I just reposted this question referencing the huffington post article about this topic. Stated the case as neutrally as possible and framed it more as "this is something which has been discussed out in the ether, what are your thoughts?" If the thread gets any serious replies I'll link back here for people to read.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 02:09 PM
1

Thank you for clarification. Maybe I was misunderstanding. I've left a message for my lawyer but have been waiting to back. Thanks for the help I definitely appreciate it.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:55 PM
2

Even if she has sole custody do I need to sign the passport? I was reading over the .gov site with the requirements and honestly I was left rather unclear. It said with sole custody one parent can do it but needed to provide the other parents death certificate so I wasn't sure if my situation was applicable. My order also states she must inform me, which she has, but that in no way speaks to or of censent. Which is the main point I'm unclear on. If I did go to court do you know what kind of peti…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:38 PM
5

I agree with you 10000000%. Maybe some kind of assualt charge or whatever the charge is for poisoning someone (probably still just considered assault) but definitely not murder. Like was stated above it refelcts the unbelievable double standard that exists in reproductive rights that the woman has the right to make a life changing decision for the man but not visa versa. People act desperate when backed into a corner.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:50 PM
2

isnt that what larry flynt got after he was shot ?
/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:08 PM
28

For the love of god make sure she stays "ex"
/r/MensRights21/02/13 02:52 PM
2

Everyone got lazy and just it in the comments. You went the extra step to show you cared. I'd upvote twice if I could.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:49 PM
1

I like my beer like I like my violence. Domestic.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:47 PM
5

So insane. Sorry to hear about this. I just came across your posts starting here (4) but am definitely going to follow the threat to get the full context. I have a daughter with a woman kept the pregnancy for the reasoning that she thought I would stay with her (we had been together for ~2 years) and my experiences with family court in NY have been nothing but hell. She drags me to court over total bs but when I have reasonable claims its not even addressed. (ex: her reason is she got into an ar…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:25 AM
4

Sorry to hear of your plight. I'm not sure if this is applicable to you but I know in japan they don't have custody laws the way America does. Custody is basically based off possession so there is a huge incentive for a Japanese American parent with a divorce looming on the horizon to just run with the child and have the Japanese authorities back them when they are on Japanese soil.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:51 PM
2

I could not disagree with this person more. I only came across this subreddit a day ago and have honestly never in my life heard of "mens rights movement" prior but thus far I do feel I can relate to a host of the points which are on the table. I have nothing against feminism and whole heartily believe people should have equal opportunity and equal rights and should not have to be concerned about things like will I get the job because I'm not X gender. The things that speak to me about this idea…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 01:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter