TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GingerPeanutButter Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by GingerPeanutButter on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I got ya. I know what you were getting at with the title now its just a bit confusing. It reads like, "much less worry about innocent men losing jobs." My guess is that alot of the respondents grouped together through much of the survey. Like, most of the ones who didn't worry about their careers being affected didn't mind lack of due process and fallout for men.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 12:03 AM
1

I'm not seeing the 29%. I see about 50% said they worry about unsubstantiated evidence ruining men's careers. I see ~18% said they think innocent men being fired is a fair byproduct. It looks like ~29% said they don't worry about the backlash harming men's careers, but that's not really what your title is saying.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 06:13 PM
1

There's a note at the bottom that says they didn't use her name at Khan's request.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 07:07 PM
1

You probably didn't write it in the tone I read it, sorry. Most people stated the third reason of reproductive rights and options and it's just not something that I really considered. I get what you're saying with the first reason. I think it kind of works similarly to reason 3. I still think that the drivers behind a number like aggregate wages which are used in the wage gap narrative would exist. I get what you're saying about this benefiting high powered women who drag up the female average, …
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:34 PM
1

What's with the attitude? I asked a question and the OP and others answered without thinking I was attacking the idea. Your first and second points arent really clear. "The not on of no woman, no society due to no children would be dead." What? Your third point is something I brought up in my comment. And your 4th point doesn't hold up because most women don't take much time off for the pregnancy, they take it after the birth. I think women would be more productive during the time they would hav…
/r/MensRights17/03/18 10:06 PM
8

I hadn't really thought of that, thanks for the insight. My first thought was maternity leave but that would still happen. I agree. If these are safer than traditional pregnancies, which it sounds like they would be, then I think it would be great.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 05:18 PM
4

I'm having trouble connecting this to men's rights. Maybe there would be a benefit to perceptions of equal parenting roles because nobody had to carry the baby for 9 mos. Curious what connection you made?
/r/MensRights17/03/18 04:54 PM
8

The wording the program director used sounds worse than the job duties. It says they mostly just help the women's center with it's duties and complete a project, which was raising money for Puerto Rico this year. One program with 7 part time workers in BFE Ohio and you use "US universities" like it was a decision made by the ED.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 03:09 PM
–

I was wondering how all of this went down in a religious studies class so I looked up the IUP course guide. They have a "Women and Religion" class, "Women in the Bible," and "Selected Topics in Feminist Studies of Religion." I'm not familiar with religious studies offerings but it still seems like an odd class for this stance to be taken.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:12 AM
3

The way they count 'female led' seems so incredibly lazy for a population size this small and it being the key variable they are disaggregating by. I did a quick run through some titles on IMDB and the first Hunger Games lists the blue haired tv host first, one of the Harry Potters doesn't list either of the Ron, Harry, Hermoine actors first. I think sometimes the credits are based on appearance and maybe IMDB just uses that. This could swing results in either direction but it just seems like ba…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 09:04 PM
7

This is a good article. I didn't know about David Sorensen but I found his statement. He's got a lot more evidence than the article was able to mention. It's nice to see a left leaning newspaper publishing an article telling the man's side of the story and putting aside political differences. https://www.scribd.com/document/371181362/David-Sorensen-Statement
/r/MensRights23/02/18 04:31 AM
3

Ok, I'll admit I missed some things. I disagree about picture, I don't really know why they used it even if it was an article specifically about male on female violence, it's actually the cover of a book about women being bored in marriages. The grand gesture I see where you're coming from. Paying attention to how your partner looks though doesn't feel bias to me. Seeing that she slipped up and used he and him a few times, which I didn't catch, shows that she was viewing this as man on female th…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 10:11 PM
1

Where does it assume that? Everything in the list uses they/their/them/partner. The only thing is two lines about women victim domestic violence numbers. If that's what you're talking about, you're reaching.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:22 PM
3

Especially when she's 27 and he turns out to be 22. I get the spirit of the post though.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 06:05 PM
3

Basically, back in the 70's Title IX was passed to ensure equal educational opportunities for men and women. Soon after that, a group of women sued their institution, Yale I think, on the basis that the sexual harrassment they had faced on campus violated their right to an equal education because of their gender. They lost the case but after that, institutions were mandated to investigate and handle sexual assault, harrassment, etc. cases between students. If it weren't mandated and the preceden…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 07:24 AM
5

I've been reading (better sourced) articles about this case for a while now. This article is mostly about him winning a case against Duke because in his sexual misconduct case, the first panel said he violated policy (these hearings aren't about being guilty of rape, but being guilty of policy violations). The panel stated he didn't get a 'yes.' The first panel also focused alot on whether she was a virgin (she likely wasn't and students testified about previous relationships) and if that should…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 01:08 AM
7

In the Duke Chronicle, reporting this same story, they said that Duke has the ability to appeal the injunction, which is why I added the "for now."
/r/MensRights22/02/18 12:28 AM
30

He won a case about whether or not Duke followed proper protocol with the case and appeals. This stopped Duke from being able to suspend him, for now. He is also suing for damages alongside that. This isn't like the cases where kid gets kicked out, woman shown to be lying, kid sues for damages, yet. I'm not sure when his name was "public," but everything I've seen has been after he sued the school. I know there's a problem with guys names getting released but I can't tell if this is one because …
/r/MensRights21/02/18 11:42 PM
4

Overturning what, sexual assault? She's asked colleges to use a higher standard of guilt. It was "preponderance of guilt" (if you think there's a 50.1% chance of guilt). It's now, "clear and convincing." But the original level was not law and neither is this.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 11:11 PM
10

They're not banned from access to all education but they are going to be expelled from that school. They'll lose access to federal financial aid if convicted of a felony but that's another matter. Someone who steals from a company may be able to get a job somewhere after their release but it sure as shit won't be the company they stole from. Someone who attacked a student can go to school somewhere, but it won't be the school who's student you attacked.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 10:39 PM
1

That 4th T/F is what I wanted to comment on. What an absolutely garbage peice of "evidence." I checked out the McKinnsey report and she certainly didn't say that the 8% of men who answered the question the same was proof that guys are treated worse. This (paraphrased) quote from that report stuck out, "Perhaps unsurprisingly, women are less optimistic about their prospects. They are less likely to aspire to be a top executive. If they do aspire for that, they are less likely to think it will hap…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 12:59 AM
1

I'm sorry about your situation man. Is there any way you can convince her you'll be nice and take care of her if she drops the charges or admits you didnt do anything wrong (not sure if that's possible)? It seems like she's struggling w money and won't be able to afford rent without you. Given a choice between having you support her and you getting prosecuted and leaving her, she may choose the former. Obviously I think you should cut and run as soon as youre able but it may be better to just co…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:17 AM
3

I think people struggle to see the forest for the trees. Going after women only spaces, SJWs, and throwing Trigglypuff on the poster is a reaction to inequity. But men and boys only spaces is also something we want, hopefully we wouldn't cannabalize worthwhile co-ed groups in the process like we've seen happen the other way. Although SJWs have a negative connotation attached to them, making fun of them while calling for true social justice ourselves seems short sighted. Do some feminists only vi…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:33 PM
1

Why do you consider the article rubbish? It's presenting facts about the quota system failing, if it was biased for the system why would they print it?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:36 AM
1

I'm hoping the psuedonym gave herself a psuedo-doctorate and psuedo-career as well. I can't imagine it would be impossible to find out who she is and I'm guessing no company would be thrilled to have a person teaching how to take down executives in her spare time. How is this shit pamphlet worth the risk?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:11 AM
5

I found this tweet and it's getting ripped apart for both reasons. Most for it being ridiculous and the rest for just using another term with man in it. Apparently yesterday was women in stem day or something so the business majors running their Twitter were probably preoccupied tweeting at women to do something they weren't willing to themselves.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 05:52 AM
7

That's interesting, I'll look that up. Would the sexual assault be considered a Title IX complaint though? I feel like that would just be considered a code of conduct violation. I know the mishandlings of sexual assault complaints end up as a title IX issue and most Title IX offices are charged with investigating assaults but it seems odd that an assault would fall within the umbrella of sexual discrimination.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 09:21 PM
7

That makes sense. The situation is odd because what happened at night surely seems like her sexually assaulting him. It's not clear which incident she is claiming she was assaulted though. I just hope he's at a school who has the right people in place to properly handle it.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 07:44 PM
1

Are you sure about advising him to go to the college and file a complaint? If he files with the school it guarantees that she will, and we all know how these have been handled lately. Maybe you've seen this work before but I haven't, and I wouldn't recommend something that hasn't been established as a successful tactic. I would recommend talking with a lawyer and getting their advice before anything.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 05:41 PM
1

I agree that he should immediately find a lawyer. As for the 30 years thing, there's no need to scare him right now. OP, just follow the advice others are giving you and follow the advice of your lawyer. You are already out ahead of this thing, just be careful. You'll be alright.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 05:32 PM
1

Considered worthless to who? If employers all of the sudden had no need for non-stem majors then we'd be talking about a national crisis. Students today already see the main reason to go to college as getting a good job, much more so than even 15-20 years ago. They do a pretty good job of adapting to the economy. Most humanities already spend most of their time educating non-majors.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 06:04 AM
2

I used gender studies just because that's what it was called at the institutions I'm familiar with. I wasn't saying that critical thinking was a foundation in all these programs (if it were truly ingrained I'm sure you'd see more men's issues coming up in them) but that if critical thinking is learned, it doesn't matter quite as much what the subject is. Especially for non-preprofessional majors.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:29 AM
1

I could see that being the case. I would hope Oxford might be on a higher standard but who knows. If any degree is not imprinting these basic skills on graduates then they should and can be removed. It's easier to come to a provost with program assessments showing little skill development and poor job outcomes than saying, "this program is biased against men."
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:22 AM
1

I know, and I really have no idea what goes on in those courses, I just hope the professors are at least attempting to introduce critical thinking as a skill, even if it's not about feminism. I'm sure there's plenty of women's studies majors not on YouTube pushing weird agendas. The point I was trying to make with that statement was more following up on the, 'well if we force institutions to defund this, where does it stop.' Politicians in America have already tried to ween out humanities majors…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:09 AM
1

It seems like the entire point of the article was that the program at Oxford isn't really funded at all. So, 'defunding' it really isn't an option. Also, from a quick search, it looks like Oxford gets about 14% of revenue from the government. Hardly enough to have sway over curriculum and as the article says, the University would face backlash if it eliminated the program. As much as you might think a Gender Studies degree is superfluous, I think it's a slippery slope to start saying 'we' should…
/r/MensRights04/02/18 09:39 PM
5

I work in the field of higher education statistics and I'll say that the gap is noticed by individual institutions but it's not really seen as an actionable issue. I know schools study and pour money into attempting to close retention/completion gaps among races, even when an individual institution doesn't see the race gap we see on the national level. The problem is the optics of what a program for men would look like right now, it's much easier to gain support for an ethnicity based program or…
/r/MensRights27/01/18 04:55 PM
17

I think the article understands the ridiculousness of the study. Interviewing 8 women who are actually studying stem to conclude why all women are graduating at lower numbers is comical.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 11:26 PM
10

At the end of the article the man's lawyer blames the under-resourced criminal justice system. While probably true, that's not where the blame should fall. We're not talking about extensive man hours and tests that could have been done to uncover the truth. All it would have taken is for the police officer to collect evidence holistically about the incident instead of collecting evidence to prove he's guilty.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 04:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter