TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Gingor Archive

View 2 posts and 769 comments by Gingor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

They got assassinated doing what he said.
/r/PussyPass27/12/14 04:52 PM
1

And she had nothing to confiscate? A car? A bed? A TV? I find it hard to believe that you can manage to get 15k into debt and not have anything that could be liquidated to pay her victim. And of course the kids stay with a thief. I'm sure she'll teach them proper values so they become productive members of society /s
/r/PussyPass27/12/14 04:51 PM
16

SRS has invaded threads about this subject in other subs, I guess the same thing is happening here.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 12:49 AM
4

Is there significant genetic predisposition for 'negative' traits in men? No. The behaviours that get counted as such are learned, not genetic. Is this ok basis for discrimination? Assuming it would exist, it still would not be OK to discriminate. It would still be discrimination based on your genes and genes are not what actually make a person. Why isn't it ok to ignore men's rights if it makes women feel safer Because it is essentially picking 50% of the population and deciding that they are m…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 12:50 AM
5

No, they are not. RadFems simply change one type of discrimination for another. Feminists in general, maybe. Egalitarians, yes. Actually non-corrupt police forces and politicians most of all.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 12:26 AM
3

Note: Goal. It is their stated goal and most feminists do aspire to it. Its easy to forget that the radical manhaters are in the minority.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:42 PM
8

Not anti-feminist. As he correctly states, the goal of feminism is equality. He didnt argue against that. He argued against specific things some feminists say that go against their stated goals.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:23 PM
6

And? Everyone objectifies people every single day. Think about it: Unless you make a conscious effort to not do it, all the people in buses/waiters/etc., basically anybody you dont know, registers just as background noise.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:48 AM
4

Yeah... Honestly, if somebody did that to me, I wouldnt be sure if I could hold myself back. If the Harddrive got killed, probably not.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 07:03 PM
16

Ah, another person who thinks destroying Another's property is the right response if he isnt paying you enough attention.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 07:01 PM
2

And it will probably still be a while before we really do reach a 50/50 representation Why would that be the goal? The sex of elected officials shouldnt matter, but their positions. If positions were reversed would you discourage people saying "Yay, men"? Yes I would. The sex of any official should not matter. Women have the same rights and chances to get elected, so why would it be something special if they are elected?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 03:21 PM
2

Not historically, but in the sense of a human generation it is. Also, just looked it up. Looks like 1922 was the first woman in the senate. Women have been elected for 90 years now.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:19 AM
0

We're simply celebrating a time and place in this country where women can finally hold a similar status. Which has been there for a long-ass time. At least 10 years. I just dont get why anybody would go "Yay, women" everytime a female is elected for something.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:55 PM
3

"Stop oppressing yourself! Stop oppressing yourself!"
/r/MensRights07/11/12 02:29 PM
23

"The simple answer is that the men's centre is everywhere else." Answer: Then get the fuck out of my space, woman. Then look at them struggling to find an argument that doesnt involve them being able to go where they want (which, of course they should be able to) in this supposed "Men's space"
/r/MensRights07/11/12 12:36 PM
4

Well, I'm stupid.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 12:11 PM
16

Nitesh soon developed bouts of vomiting. To stop it, Soumya stuffed paper napkins in his mouth but he fell unconscious Not only psychotic, also stupid. "Hey, he is vomiting. I'm gonna stuff that hole where the vomit comes out and the air goes in. Nothing bad could happen there"
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:13 AM
1

In the article it doesnt mention it was her boyfriend, just a friend.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:12 AM
5

Eh, the SRSers mention it quite a bit on mainstream subs
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:11 AM
7

He means on average. Heterosexual men have sex with hetero women. Therefore, they have the same number of sexual partners.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:09 AM
116

Well, you see, discussions can only be had if everybody agrees on everything. How else would I get to reinforce my ideas?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:04 AM
2

Have you never seen, say, the Phelps "God hates fags" people on the news? Look at: Dunno about your country I'm not American. We look at these news from America and just roll our eyes and say "Americans..." That the sociohistorical context of the word has nothing to do with the difference? You cant judge an Individual in the present times after what Individuals, that had by chance the same colour or status, did a hundred years ago. That is just as unjust as what the Klan guy is doing. That if th…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:11 AM
3

Did you really just pull the "I have gay friends so I cannot do anything homophobic arguments"? What are you, a Republican senator from the 90s? Seeing as I never said I used it (and actually said above that I am fully against using any insults): Nope. Do you really think people---even teenagers---are so ignorant as to be unaware of the widespread past and current usage of the word? If they would think about it: No. However, how many people do bother to think? I mean, it's not like people have s…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 05:54 AM
3

Do you realize that the reason "faggot" is used as a general insult is due to it being an anti-gay slur? Yes and no. I am fairly sure most people that use it dont even know what it means. Heck, I remember back in Highschool, "Gay" and "Jew" (the latter being quite more disturbing for me, as it was picked up from a WWII Movie) was used as a joking insult by pretty much everybody, yet everybody was also open to actual gay people and jews. Words that are used as insults dont necessarily still have …
/r/MensRights07/11/12 05:17 AM
13

In this Article: People not understanding that Chivalry was supposed to provide a certain balance. Women did the housework and didnt have a say in a lot of stuff, but got money and Protection provided for it. Now, why exactly should Chivalry live on if Women dont conform to their gender roles? (Not that they should, btw)
/r/MensRights06/11/12 09:40 PM
13

IMO, the most common slurs and taunts are "i'm going to rape you/you got raped/rape the shit out of them/ RAAAAPE" or the word "faggot". Rape is not specifically against women. Like, at all. Its more an expression of dominance. Might as well say "I killed you five times while you didnt even see me" As for faggot: I'd argue it has become disassociated with actual gay people. Its a pretty general insult now. Notice that they are not saying "Haha, you fuck other men" Now, I am not exactly for namec…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:17 PM
7

That thread in /r/worldnews was disgusting. Do people really believe that these vigilantes will deal justice? Vigilantes arent exactly known for adhering to due process and stuff. Yes, women in Egypt are treated shitty, but a horde of guys beating up people because somebody told them they harassed somebody is absolute bullshit and no solution whatsoever.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 01:36 PM
2

As a man, someone forgot to give me my right of giving birth to a child. Thats not a right, thats an ability. The president of the united states doesn't have the same responsibilities as a grocery store clerk. Not in the current system, no. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need " What do you mean by rights, standards and responsibilities Rights is pretty self-explanatory: Nobody stands above the law, etc. Standards: Everybody should be held to the same (general) educ…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 09:38 AM
5

"Are there rational reasons why men refuse to tie the knot?" Are there rational reasons to do it? You dont gain any benefits, so why should I get off my ass and marry?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:05 AM
5

Men and women aren't equal. Depends on what you mean with equality. Equality in the sense of identical - no. Equality in the sense of both should have the same rights and responsibilities and be held to the same standards then yes, they are equal. Equality is a leftist dream. Equality is our goal. Todays dream is tomorrows reality.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 11:59 PM
3

, I asked all of the gay male students in the room to raise their hand if in the past week they touched a woman’s body without her consent Not grabbing. Touching a hand without asking first counts.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 11:46 PM
3

I never said "spare" her, just that a jail sentence is inappropriate for the crime Community service just does not fit the severity of what she did, in my opinion. And a 15 year old really should have the maturity to know that a rape accusation is not something you throw around lightly. Granted, leeway may be given for the age, but I wouldnt say as severe as no prison sentence at all. I'd say if a perpetrator would be punished with up to 15 years, a maximum sentence of 5 years would be just.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 09:57 PM
12

American jails do practically nothing but create criminals because our prison system is focused on punishment rather than rehabilitation Then that should be changed, instead of letting such people get away with simple communiy service. This is a 15 year old girl who made a stupid claim, probably as a cry for attention As a 15 year old she really should know not to do such things. I'd say its a cry for attention if she stopped eating or faked an illness. Potentially ruining somebodys live because…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 08:22 PM
19

Rather than "throwing the whole family under the bus," he said, "let's pull behind her and see what assistance we can give to the family." Nobody talks about throwing the whole family under the bus, but the teen who did it should get as much of a punishment as somebody who actually raped someone would get. This is no little thing to lie about, she could have easily ruined somebodys live. If she really has psychological problems they should be adressed in jail.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:00 PM
7

Goddamned cowards being too young or being wounded in battle.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:52 PM
1

If you want to talk about double standards, consider that it's perfectly acceptable for you to take your shirt off in public, but not women. Visual sexual organs. Women have them on the chest. Men dont.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 03:22 PM
1

I propose strippers, one on the left border of the screen, one on the right, be added to all programmes. That should jumpstart the ratings.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 11:05 AM
9

At least it has more normal looking people than American TV
/r/MensRights03/11/12 11:03 AM
1

Let me start off by saying that I am right. I am so right that I feel no need for political correctness, no need for intellectual discourse for the sake of intellectual discourse. Thats where I stopped reading. I just assume that anybody who thinks he is absolutely right and doesnt feel the need to argue about it is wrong. Usually, that is spot on.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 10:50 AM
3

Convert to islam and laugh at them as their heads explode.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:36 AM
-1

Not necessarily, no. The problem lies more with how such advances are portrayed in some feminist writings and the commonness they happen in Reality.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:32 AM
44

But that would require them to actually stand up for themselves instead of being passive-agressive shitheads.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:01 AM
1

Not thinking critically has nothing to do with Marx. Marxism and socialism is all about thinking critically and constantly analyzing your position. Why do you think are there a giant amount of different types? The problem with a lot of PC-culture is simple: Parroting. They saw somebody thinking critically about something once, and thought "Hey, I wanna do that too" and subsequently copied everything. Then it gets stupider as time goes on as more of the original message gets lost. Its basically C…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:00 AM
4

I, for one, greet every new male I see by a friendly grab into his pants. Dont know what others do, though.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:54 PM
4

These are the same fucking women that preach it is not the duty of women to take care of men meanwhile who don't challenge what Men's duties are, I understood this as regarding the women that do not want to contribute their part, as they are not willing to fulfill their traditional gender roles, but meanwhile expect men to fulfill theirs.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:27 AM
5

The 13-year olds really say some creepy shit to female gamers, so as long as a simple "cunt" or something doesnt count, I'm fine with it. The problem is, it probably will. sigh
/r/MensRights31/10/12 11:28 PM
9

My general rule: Be nice and helpful to all people, except the ones that take it for granted. Fuck those entitled assholes.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 11:20 PM
10

all women's fault Reread. He did not say it is all womens fault, he said it is the fault of the people that are supposed to take care of other people, that often only see the problems women face and the women (not all women, a specific subset of them) that only care about tearing their gender roles down, but expect men to stick to theirs and be the protectors, go to war, show no feelings...
/r/MensRights31/10/12 11:14 PM
2

The leftists. I am a communist.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 09:22 PM
7

Just like they're going to advocate for an economic system that supports the laziest and most unfortunate at the cost of the best and the wealthiest. Please, before you place any judgement upon communism at least read the Communist Manifesto. Or try /r/debateacommunist . Lots of misconceptions in your post.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:38 PM
22

Non-white.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 03:54 PM
4

Time to whip out the blackface then.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 03:53 PM
0

Except the bourgeoisie, who conveniently die in the revolution Not necessarily. If they decide to give up their strangehold on the means of production they will live, just like anybody else. Then who ever actually makes the capital production decisions is ostensibly in charge Which would be the workers as the means of production are now in their hands.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 03:38 PM
5

/r/socialism is pretty reasonable, /r/DebateaCommunist has all kinds of people there
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:30 PM
1

However, rejecting the aims of feminism We do not reject the aims of feminism, we reject the people that claim to represent these aims. We agree that the sexes should be equal and that gender roles should be abolished, but not that Males (as a gender) oppress women (again, as a gender, not individual cases) or thta only males can rape (UK law), that fathers are less important for children than mothers or other things some feminists support. acting like women are already equal/completely denying …
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:28 PM
2

most of the left is very anti-male They may be, but our ideology isnt. Equality for everybody no matter gender, race or class.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:02 PM
0

They are not. The radical left is for equality of everybody. That is inherently incompatible with the Men-hating that SRS has going on.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:01 PM
3

As a communist: We arent all like that. They are Stalinists, mainly.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:00 PM
4

If your claim is that white people have it so bad, take that elsewhere. The claim by (radical) feminists is that white males are on the top of the privilige ladder. After that come non-white males, then white women, then non-white women. Trans/Homosexual people fit somewhere in there too. Not sure where.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 11:50 AM
13

The court, overturning an earlier ruling which had found in the pilot's favour, accepted Lufthansa's argument that the cap was part of the historical development of a male pilot's uniform Yes, and its part of the historical development of passenger flight that women are not allowed to be pilots. That argument is utter BS, btw.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 11:42 AM
3

Yep, I was banned there some time back for suggesting that Prostitution is not necessarily rape.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 11:34 AM
7

Then I respond in a polite way with a nice wall of text backing up my argument, and they reply by picking out one sentence to take out of context, or ignore it Exactly the reason I dont bother with a well-reasoned argument anymore when somebody already calls me names before I start it. Their mind is already made up, facts are not going to get in the way of that. Might as well spend my time with other stuff.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 05:15 PM
8

I remember the guy who gave live-updates as he kidnapped somebody on his facebook. People can really be that stupid.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 10:32 AM
1

What's wrong with healers anyways, it's probably the most reactive role in the game PvE is boring as hell when alone because you lack the DPS capabilities of other classes.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 09:46 PM
9

Well, the image wasnt incorrect, a report was filed for him saying "Do I know you". People just assumed that he was arrested for that.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 09:35 PM
1

Yes, we should have separate governments for issues pertaining only to a certain group - we need a male government, a female government, a black government, an arab government, an indian government... This is absolutely better than having politicians that are voted into office because of their views (ideally, at least) by everybody
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:34 AM
2

I actually use it mostly to mix things up. When I write a long post about sex issues, there is going to be an awful lot of "man/woman" going on. Would be boring to read, therefore "man/male/woman/female" comes in.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:10 PM
1

I feel like he values his money more than he values our relationship and that he doesn't trust me Not necessarily. People change with time and a marriage is hopefully going to hold a fairly long time. How can he (or you, for that matter) predict how you are going to be in 10, 20 or even 30 years?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:48 PM
3

Remember, this is the same magazine that recommended pulling a guys crotch hair as "little known erogenous zone". They know as much about men as Medieval writers did about Blemmyes
/r/MensRights24/10/12 10:04 AM
6

Even Pussy Riot got out pretty well with only a few years prison. Heres a summary of all the shit they did (I didnt write it): 1) Pussy Riot gig at Christ the Savior Cathedral (original video) [1] http://www.youtube.COM/watch?v=grEBLskpDWQ 2) Public group sex gig at the biology museum (NSFW): [2] http://plucer.livejournal.COM/55710.html (P.S. Tolokonnikova and her husband. Tolokonnikova is a pregnant one.) 3) Grocery store (yep - there were children present there NSFW) [3] http://kotkin-egor.liv…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:58 AM
3

I usually repair stuff by having mastered the mystical art of "reading the manual"
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:42 AM
1

Oh, I meant RL.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 11:48 PM
4

They are pointing out people think its funny when you make jokes where women are the punchline (kitchen) but not men. Except the reality is pretty much the opposite of this. Go on, try to make a joke about how women should make you a sandwich.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 12:49 PM
1

The ad is just stupid. Actual sexual harassment happens next to never on full trains (at least where I live) as the perpetrator cant run away.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:46 AM
4

Yes. Especially at rush time. Sometimes a train is so full that you cant physically fit in.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:02 PM
3

History != Present
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:22 AM
2

No, they didnt. Men that didnt work starved or became beggars (same for women). And beggars had a good chance to be killed in those times. Men that didnt serve time in the military, depending on where they lived, were looked down upon as weak and scolded for it or hanged if conscription was active.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:21 AM
6

It's kinda gross that people are giving so much weight to the books in the room, arguing that their behavior can be attributed to what they read Btw: None of the books contain anything related to constraining and cutting somebody. Its just the usual "they are into the Occult, that must be why they are crazy" shit you hear from Massmedia.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 04:14 AM
3

Even assuming she didnt plan it (and had the knife for... I dont know, knifey reasons) no jailtime and only 500$ is just fucking laughable. They might as well have "punished" her with a stern talking-to
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:21 PM
1

Apparently, theres only 7 religions.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:14 AM
35

No, the issue is that they explicitly stated that we would be next.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:47 AM
6

SRS=SA, at least part of them
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:44 AM
19

I don't see how creepshots relates to mensrights at all They were legal and were took down because a lot of people didnt like it. Its legal in the US (where the servers are) to take photos of people in public.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:36 AM
21

Once upon a time, "he" was the pronoun one used when talking about somebody of unspecified gender. That was before some people started throwing fits over patriarchical grammar.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 01:23 PM
24

In Northern Europe there was a recognition that there was a problem. They instituted quotas and have put in place laws that address women have in the workplace and in government. From a comment. I do not know how somebdoy cant recognize quotas as being bad for women that are actually knowledgeable and sexist against men. If quotas are put in place, women often are automatically regarded as "quota-women" that know nothing about their job and were just hired to conform to them. At the same time, m…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:49 AM
2

Also if she is referring to women as the weaker sex then refer to it in the same manner and tell her women will never be equal in her world because to her women are the weaker sex. This. I never got how somebody can argue for equality while still saying that women are lesser beings, basically.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:50 AM
5

Even better: WW1. Wearing uniforms of waxed paper (on the alps), eating worms (if anything), staying awake for days on end because the enemy could come and slit your thorat in the night only to get then seared alive by mustard gas. Its a fucking hoot.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:17 AM
2

for a young man it’s much more fun to prance around with a gun, or to kill several enemies with a bomb, than it is to sit at a desk day after day, bored by a dead-end job TIL: Men are all psychopaths.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:13 AM
5

Nice. Some are really surprising Also: • If God is male, then male is God. The divine patriarch castrates women as long as he is allowed to live on in the human imagination. For a theologian criticizing the Catholic Church, she knows remarkably few things about it. God is above genders in Christianity, as well as Judaism, dont know about Islam.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 07:53 PM
3

I don't know if the US where reddit is hosted has such laws, but if it does and the people are recognizable, it's illegal. It doesnt. Servers are in the US, therefore the subs arent illegal on reddit. Might be illegal to visit depending on your country, though.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 07:40 PM
1

Eh, its understandable. Boobs are easier to market than pretty much anything else.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 06:18 AM
9

Probably the part where they're fucking (as in literally fucking) pillows with anime characters on them and sometimes these characters are made to appear like little kids. Better than fucking real kids, no? It's drawn characters. Nobody gets harmed, no matter what they do with their drawn stuff. And what they do with their pillows is really not anybodys business but theirs.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:12 PM
8

What I dont understand: How exactly is any fiction ruined by writing fan-fiction? If you like it: Nice for you. If not: Dont read it. "Problem" solved.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 07:48 PM
6

wears a kilt everyhwere Look, they are really frigging comfortable.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 07:46 PM
5

And how exactly does it make you a pervert? Or creepy?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 07:44 PM
2

Not really possible. Its was funded through and organized by the International Marxist tendency. The website of the Pakistan chapter might have something, but its not in English.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:32 PM
2

It was funded by a village where the Taliban murdered 14 people.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:07 PM
8

I also assume he never took any holiday pics. Got a photo in front of some castle? Photographed others without consent. /r/creepshots was creepy, but legal. You cant ban subs because you dont like them or all you get is one giant echochamber for your ego.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:27 PM
10

I'm actually fine with it as long as he only publishes it should one of these people doxx somebody. Retaliation is a bitch.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:23 PM
5

Mine is 18-19. Always. He never reaches 20.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:30 PM
8

Being an atheist does not erase privilege. This includes white privilege. Stopped reading there. Dont wanna get a headache again.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:29 PM
4

She was/is a collaborationist with the occupying power. She isnt. She is part of a Marxist resistance group, opposed to both US imperialism and the reactonary Taliban. This group did, in fact also organize the school she gave the speech in, for which she was allegedly shot. Of course you wouldnt hear that in the liberal media.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:40 AM
3

Police in the country's biggest force are to use the licensing laws to shut down pubs and clubs where high levels of rape and sexual assaults take place as part of a radical attempt to create a hostile environment for rapists. I'd take that as an invite to create a hostile environment for the police. Its basically a prohibition of public assembly - places with more people are bound to have more crimes occuring.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:09 AM
14

That thread gave me a headache when I read it. "Why is female bisexuality more acceptable than male bisexuality?" Because misogyny. Wait, wat?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:04 AM
8

A lot of people do. Massive Downvoting is a strong tool for keeping stuff from widespread knowledge
/r/MensRights10/10/12 10:41 PM
6

Mh, strange. I use cable, its enough for me to shut down my router for a few seconds to get a new IP.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:22 PM
4

I think reddit.com is a User-Acc that all the admins can access. If you want to contact the admins about a sensitive issue, it might be wiser to send them PMs to their single accounts imho.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:39 PM
10

Didnt SA basically make SRS?
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:37 PM
6

IP-banning isnt possible/practicable. Most people have dynamic IPs, meaning they change about once a day. To block one troll, you'd have to block all IPs in his region of his provider.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:32 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/help/faq#Whorunsreddit Here are the admins.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:30 PM
24

Blackmail != Free speech Its a crime. Pure and simple. If I hit you in the face it isnt an issue of free speech, if I rob your house its not an issue of free speech, why should this be?
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:28 PM
364

The admins cannot let this stand. Seriously. That is clear blackmail, a criminal offence. If they do not provide the identity of the blackmailer to the police and ban him and all others that condone it, Reddit becomes a joke. They banned /r/jailbait for illegal activity, they should ban /r/ShitRedditSays for illegal activity.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:24 PM
12

So, what of that do you find offensive exactly? Sounds pretty good to me (well, the gun-thing is a bit strange)
/r/MensRights08/10/12 10:59 PM
5

The people saying women shouldnt have to exercise concern for their safety better not lock their doors at night. There shouldnt be any robberies, therefore if you say somebody should lock their door its victim blaming.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:25 PM
36

“I was not raped,” she said, adding she had not been physically abused at all. So her story was basically "I had a boyfriend once"
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:16 PM
2

And Silver wrote in his motion that Dockum did not possess the software necessary to retrieve the suspect images once they had been stored in his computer’s temporary cache. Since when do you need software other than Windows for that? I can just open up the Explorer and go to my temporary cache. Anyways: Police and computers dont mix. Most policemen have no clue whatsoever about computers. Investigations involving them should only be able to be led by an officer that has some kind of certificate…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:08 AM
10

An unborn fetus goes through so much more pain No, it doesnt.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:54 PM
2

There really should be more effort to educate 12+ year olds on their options. And a law against families trying to stop an abortion the mother wants (dont know if this is already a thing). As an aside: Why the fuck are all the murderers/suicide attempts I read about today so damn inefficient?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 03:25 AM
14

Nah, we all know men can only be happy when somebody is raped.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 03:12 AM
5

How the fuck did she even make a connection between domestic violence and Page 3? She pretty much said "Violence happens to women and that is why Page 3 is dangerous". How the fuck does that even come near logic or reason? It's like saying Postcard Painting caused Hitler.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 03:58 PM
15

Oh, I'd kill for revenge too. I just wouldnt expect any leniency from the law after the fact. The law has to be blind to be just. If you murder somebody, you are a murderer and should be in prison.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 03:49 PM
2

A post-industrial economic system in which the means of production are owned privately, by relatively few peope. Regulations on Corporations simply prolong the life of capitalism as workers do not realize as easily how exploited they are when they are not working 20 hour days 6-7 days a week. Bread and circuses, basically.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:38 PM
2

The Occupy Wall Street movement OWS was not radical in any way. It was a liberal movement. JtO's experiences in Vancouver The poster teardown? Werent there mostly men in the vid? Feminism also seems to be a very radicalizing thing. It attracts people that were in bad relationships and basically tells them that there is a system that forced them into it, that they were not at fault, that its just the evil patriarchy. I dont have any experience with the radical right wing, so I cant say anything a…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 11:26 AM
3

Sounds to me like you need to get out. My advice would be to get away from there, if you have the money try going to another country. Dont leave an adress, just go.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 11:20 AM
1

Why would you not? Capitalism is a flawed system from the start. More regulation is simply a way of prolonging its life. And vouchers? Why would you use vouchers instead of just improving the public school system?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 11:16 AM
3

As a male Marxist I can tell you that women appear less likely to be radical. If thats what you are worried about, you are pretty safe.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 11:13 AM
6

I would say nobody is having anything against circumcision here, as long as it is performed on adults. We generally shouldnt make bodily modifications on babies or children, unless its a live-threatening situation. Circumcision is pretty much cosmetic surgery.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 11:10 AM
1

Didnt hear of that before. Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 04:36 AM
3

It is an either/or choice. Peace is binary. You cannot have 20% peace. Peace is peace. War is war.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:22 AM
1

So you want a devastated planet and war? Nice non-religious values you got there bro.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:11 AM
7

Class rooms are rarely big enough that people wouldnt notice an assault, even in 100% darkness. The minimum thing to happen would be that the teacher tells them to be silent because its making noise (I very much doubt they could do the acts described in complete silence), then investigate as they dont stop. I'd say its very likely BS.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:06 PM
4

is trying to insinuate their values - which are religious in nature Just because religions contain them doesnt mean they are religious in nature. They are universal, at least some of them. How about peace, harmony with nature, etc. ? They are all important in buddhism. Just because you are a priest doesnt mean you arent human.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:01 PM
3

Eh, I have nothing against /r/LadyBoners . If you place a pic of you on the internet, be prepared to see it somewhere else and completely unrelated later. Granted, a lot of people whine when men do it.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:55 PM
1

Our equivalent would probably be more like /r/creepshots, as they are unwillingly/unknowingly posted there.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:53 PM
3

TL;DR: You cant base laws/rules for everybody on the feelings of some.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:50 PM
-1

Get Romney in there, send the pic to some news sites.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:47 PM
1

I think theres a problem with that: We really shouldnt see "a man" as an emissary of "men". If "a man" is a nerdy technician it doesnt mean that "the men" are nerdy technicians. If "a woman" is hot and nothing else it doesnt mean that "women" are hot and nothing else.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:28 PM
1

Good thing I have Adblock.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:21 PM
11

"Stop oppressing yourself" is basically what the radfems tell working class men when they ask what privilige they have.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 01:12 AM
6

They might simply relabel prostitution in general as sex trafficking. Or any prostitue that isnt working in her country of origin is automatically counted as trafficked.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 01:11 AM
10

Welcome back boobz. This sub just wouldnt be the same without you somewhere way down with a billion downvotes.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 01:06 AM
3

My concern in letting her meet them would be that she could try to kidnap them again.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 04:18 PM
3

jail for manslaughter What? Were they not able to prove intent? How hard can it be if she drugged him and ran him over twice?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 04:03 PM
23

You were on one date with her, you better be ready to sacrifice your life for her.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 03:59 PM
3

Honestly, I wouldnt be so sure its in the kids best interest to see their kidnapper (even if its their mother) again before they are grown up.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 03:58 PM
5

Well, a chastity belt always stopped rape in ye olden times. Why not wear full body armor? Only a rapist would say something against that! (/s, obviously)
/r/MensRights03/10/12 03:56 PM
19

Expect downvotes as soon as SRS finds it. And the whiteknights of course. I'll read it in a few hours to see all their delicious tears.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:40 PM
1

You are supposed to have 5 meals a day. breakfast snack lunch snack dinner Lunch is supposed to be somewhere between 700-1000cal (adults), with the rest of the daily calories being split between other meals.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:32 PM
4

My policy as well: If its a troll and you were helpful: Nothing happens. Maybe you get laughed at for having "fallen" for a troll. If its genuine and you were helpful: You just helped somebody.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:34 PM
5

I dont see anything non-standard there, honestly. No memes or rage comics. Needed, because subs that allow them get flooded by the damned things. No linking to SRS or affiliated subs. They're trolls. They want attention. Dont give it to them. Young accounts are given no tolerance. Trolling is mostly done by throwaways. Spam/Off-Topic posts will be removed. Self-explanatory. Advocating for violence/illegal acts may be removed (this is not the same as advocating for changes to the laws governing t…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:31 PM
5

I should really stop reading dailymail. Bad for the blood pressure. A burly gym teacher is claiming a puny six-year-old student beat him up and caused him debilitating personal injury. Sure, and if the gym teacher had done something, it would be "Burly gym teacher beats up helpless six year old student"
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:26 PM
2

We had the same situation, except with IT-equipment. No weight problem at all, teacher still said only Boys would have to carry it. Only 1 guy moved. The rest of us striked until the teacher gave up and the girls had to help carry the stuff.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:22 PM
1

We had segregated PE in my highschool. This translated into the boys mostly doing training (stamina, strength), while the girls mostly played volleyball. Unless both genders are working off the same standards, I'd prefer non-segregated PE.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:19 PM
0

He was (apparently) not in any danger. If she did attack him again or threaten him for leaving her, I'd say its OK. She didnt.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 12:20 AM
2

Thats actually understandable. Think about how fucked a male teacher would be if one of the girls would tell her parents that he made them strip.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:56 PM
7

Make them have sex in front of you too. Could be she is just a pilljunkie.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:35 PM
5

This is a practice, yes. But it is not buying the woman. Since the woman will relocate to her husbands household after marriage, the household of her parents will lose a worker, so they are compensated by a bride price. On the other hand, her husband got a dowry from her parents, designed to enable them to furnish their household. This has been practiced in Middle Europe since Germanic times. Still should, in my opinion, actually. It gives newlyweds a decent start into their new live, as opposed…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:46 AM
4

Actually, they were pretty much 50% men. In those days you had to be married to be respectable.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:47 AM
-3

I agree. The thing is, they are saying when the same exact reasoning is used on a man, it isnt.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:12 AM
-13

Funny thing is, a 100-200 years ago this is exactly what you would have said to women. But then it would be sexism.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:34 AM
7

Stupid dead people, just slacking off all day.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:04 PM
1

We get to paradise earlier! Suck it, women!
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:54 AM
3

You can see it in the news today too (Well, at least in America) the debates about choice etc. Regarding the abortion debate you have to ask if the anti-abortion side is doing it to trap women into traditional gender roles or because of religion. I think its the latter. Saying its a "war against women" is a bit far fetched (not directly against your comment, just saying) I'm pro-choice btw. what is still, by and large, a patriarchal culture. You lost me there. Patriarchal culture, as defined by …
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:25 PM
2

So... men ruled societies are ruled by men and women ruled societies are ruled by everybody... Wat? Sometimes I wonder how people manage to believe in clear paradoxons.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:30 PM
18

but she is suspicious about the amount and he refuses to show her his paycheck. So she isnt even comfortable with him bending to her wishes, she is also a suspicious bitch and expects him to share everything. Nice marriage when your partner doesnt even trust you. He should get out of that.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:32 PM
12

He may hide it because its not entirely legal. Working without registering (no taxes), pot dealing, dumpster diving, etc. All good jobs, all illegal (more or less) and somewhat looked down upon.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:27 PM
6

More of these threads are popping up. I'm pretty sure that the "I found a picture of me in r/creepshots, I'm a minor" thread was a SRS plant. They are making my head hurt. So many people who do not understand that big websites can only survive with a non-involvement policy.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:23 PM
4

Neither are the brains of 18-year olds. If you set that as the barrier, you'd have to change the Age of Consent to 22 or so. I'd say that 15 year olds are far enough in their development to make these decisions. As I'm living in a country with an Age of consent of 14 (with a partner of max. 3 years older), I have seen this in praxis. It works.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:01 PM
3

Honestly, unless the teacher used grades or something to extort a "relationship" out of her, I can see nothing wrong with this. At 15 you are already pretty ready for relationships, so why not? (Note: I would advocate age of consent at 15, generally)
/r/MensRights27/09/12 12:40 PM
7

Dont stick your dick in crazy. Also applicable to your tongue, apparently.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 12:35 PM
11

start doing the uncompensated household labor that women typically do. Really? Look at your calendar please, it shouldnt stand at 1950 anymore. Good luck trying to find a woman that is totally OK with doing all the housework. Seriously, try it. Then die alone because you will probably not find any. Nowadays the housework is split. And its better that way.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:15 AM
4

It is incorrect. Marxism isnt totalitarian in the slightest. Its purpose is to free everybody. What you might mean is socialism, in which it is necessary to educate the people so they won't vote their former corporate masters into power again.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:44 AM
2

They are 2 different things. A court can grant Child support, or/and it can grant reparations. In this case, its child support.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:14 PM
39

How exactly would one be supposed to measure consent? Consent is either present or it isnt. There is no 100%, 90%, 60% or 10%. Its binary.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:53 PM
36

I really wonder if there ever actually was a rapist that just didnt notice that rape is somewhat frowned upon.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:50 PM
6

The problem with that is that we would need to stop posting threads of other subreddits alltogether to get rid of it. Not exactly ideal.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:09 PM
4

Just watched a module of that on Youtube. I wonder how you managed to actually stay and watch the whole thing. It is badly acted, badly written, the premises are shitty and that doesnt even begin to touch on how stupid the ideas the module expresses are. I suppose its good that they at least admit that men can be harassed too.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:31 AM
11

So... Do I need a concealed carry license for a case of beer?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:20 AM
3

They are. Actually, they do not fit together at all. The radical left wants equality of all. Radical feminists want superiority of women.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 09:21 PM
0

Heres some leftist subreddits with non-SRS-mods: /r/Anarchy101 /r/Marxism /r/socialism /r/AnarchistNews
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:21 PM
0

Marxism and anarchism arent polar opposites. Its more 2 ways to get to a goal. Marxism: First there would need to be socialism to teach people how to be nice to each other and not fuck everybody over. After a few generations, communism follows, heavily democratic, to teach people how to vote and stuff, a few generations after that, the government gets sloooowly faded out. Anarchism: Away with the government.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:14 PM
3

Nah, its just the people in that sub. Anarchists are usually pretty nice guys. Of course, what can you expect of a sub with a SRS-mod?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:11 PM
2

You are comparing two different things. Somebody in a car that signals "upstanding middle class citizen" against somebody in a car that signals "Uncaring, poor or criminal". While I would probably likelier take a ride with the scruffy dude, as he sounds much more interesting, I do see a point you might have. It is sexist if you compare 2 equal cars, however, Soccer mom vs. Soccer dad, and decide that the guy is creepy.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:06 PM
3

I agree with the guy saying it was the names. Maybe it's because I'm not in an english speaking country, but I associate "Jennifer" mostly with prostitutes.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:01 PM
2

They said most eunuchs spent as much time outside the palace as they did inside it. Yep, that says it all. The normal peasant didnt live long because of malnutrition, disease and dangers in the outside (wild animals, felling trees...). The nobility didnt live long because of wars, feuds, assassins. The eunuchs got to enjoy pretty much the same care as the nobles, while not being exposed to the dangers.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:50 AM
3

I believe that was less of a problem of sexism, more of classism. The suffragettes where (mostly) bourgeois, the men that couldnt vote were working class.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:34 AM
1

Sure she didnt confuse something? The Tantrics I am familiar with are crazy sorcerers in India that make paste out of dead infants and stuff.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:47 AM
1

But... But... They are so opressed by the evil patriarchy there. Its even stronger than here!
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:39 AM
15

Good that she proposed. More women should take action in a relationship now and then. Also, I agreed with a SRS-poster for the first time. Now I feel sick...
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:18 AM
12

A question - Why not just ban every SRS poster here? Yes, they could make throwaways but it would sure clean up some of the BS.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 12:21 PM
26

It's enough to make you think maybe their lack of sexual desire stems from feelings of inadequacy Couldnt be that the japanese dating culture is severely shit. You are expected to have a good income, safe employment, nice apartment, ideally play a musical instrument or two, have travelled a bit, good education, adhere strongly to tradition... Basically, dating in Japan requires a hell of a lot more effort than in the west. Of course a lot of people decide to keep out of it altogether. Also notic…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 03:28 AM
2

The idea of pooling together money and founding our own country with blackjack and hookers comes to mind again.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 10:48 PM
2

I'm a Secular Humanist atheist. If I were to move to the Middle East, I would probably get lynched/discriminated Eh, unless you go mock Muhammad or so you should be OK. Christians too. Me as a polytheist? Ouch.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 10:44 PM
1

For anybody wanting to live in Ireland: Catholicism is still pretty strong, some people will mistrust you if you arent catholic. (I dont live there, this is the experience of some of the pagan people that do) It has awesome grass though. And weather. Love the weather.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 10:40 PM
7

If you see a woman on the street at night, just throw yourself to the floor and avert your eyes so she doesnt mistake you for a rapist. You can stand up again when you cant hear her footsteps anymore.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 10:35 PM
0

... Half the population can do that and couldnt do it before. Its worth it.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 10:30 PM
27

DUI? Forget it, not accountable, you were drunk.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 07:49 PM
10

I demand a Hindu quota for catholic bishops!
/r/MensRights22/09/12 07:45 PM
6

Austria allows a step-parent to adopt a child if the estranged parent consents or a court decides the parent is abusive or completely disinterested in the child. While the mother has sole custody, the father has regular contact with his son and pays alimony. Problem fucking solved. He isnt disinterested as he has contact with his son. They argue the father “failed to give a valid reason” for refusing to give up his parental rights so that the lesbian partner can replace him. "No valid reasons" !…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 11:55 AM
12

I've seen one or two anti-gay comments in this sub since I was here and they were downvoted to hell.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:54 AM
3

As a positive, their hookers are fairly cheap and fairly good.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 11:50 PM
5

TIL Men have no hearts.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 11:47 PM
1

Really? I didnt read anywhere that he was in the Basij. Because the "morality police" is a actual part of the armed forces of Iran, not just any random guy.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 04:41 PM
16

None. Only men can rape, didnt you know?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 03:34 PM
1

That topic was also in r/worldnews The people defending the attackers usually do it with "implicit violence", which is total BS. Unless somebody is already holding a gun to your head, violence can hardly be assumed as easily. Who says this Cleric was going to get them beaten up for dressing too scantily? Could've been he was just trying to keep them from getting thrown into jail by the morality police. I doubt that it actually helped these women in any way btw. They beat up a holy man, if they g…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:53 PM
7

In 90% of cases, made up facts are supporting the opinion of the author.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:17 AM
2

We have no financier and we will not aquire any in the near future. Corparations/Rich People that give to feminists do it for positive publicity. MRAs are all mysoginistic pro-rape middle-aged white men in the publics eye. Anybody who would donate to MR would get torn apart in the Media. They would lose a major amount of customers, so nobody is going to do it. I could see something like a "Worldwide Union for MR" working with membership fees. Of course, such an organiation would also have to do …
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:23 PM
13

... If its so terrible for her maybe she shouldnt have married him. Oh, wait, then she wouldnt get his money.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:14 PM
43

And that is why sex offender registries shouldnt exist. This guy wouldnt have found the people he wanted to kill were they not public.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 04:33 PM
16

Sulphur hurts the brain and the nose alike.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 03:39 PM
5

But then she would have to grow up and face possible rejection. How could anybody ever stand that? Oh, wait...
/r/MensRights20/09/12 05:09 AM
2

I actually agree with you. Guilt tripping definitely should count as coercion, it can fuck up your mind something bad.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 04:30 PM
8

He be trolling.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 04:24 PM
15

Pretty much this. Either women are equal or they are children that need protection/softer laws/arent able to make decisions. One of those applies. Cant have both.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 10:50 PM
2

Dude, you cant just avoid your neighbours like that. It would be impolite as fuck, not to mention that if he suddenly started to ignore them, the mother would probably ask if something happened.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:32 PM
2

They've done studies on date rapists that show many of them don't take their own crimes that seriously Psychological Problem, not a societal one. Lots of them are sociopaths. This subreddit often talks about how awful it is when women make jokes about men getting raped, such as female pedophiles or that burglar who was tied up as a woman's slave. Real ones. Joking about an actual real crime is... unfunny.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 04:09 AM
3

DayZ. Its fun falling down, breaking your legs and desparately crawling back to your comrades in the hope that nobody shoots you on the way or you just bleed out. Sniper Elite V2/Red Orchestra 2/Kane and Lynch. You can shoot an enemy in a non-vital area, they fall down and scream for their mothers while their movement gets slower and slower, then they die. Fallout3/New Vegas: You can cripple limbs and get yours crippled. Its fairly easily healed, though (unless modded). Thats pretty much all I c…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 04:07 AM
3

This. Just because women wear less doesnt mean men are sexualized (hate that word) less. I cant think of a single male character in a videogame that was ugly and where it wasnt his main trait.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 04:00 AM
8

This. Then put copies of the police report (or something like that) up.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 03:55 AM
11

Easy: Marriage has (next to) no benefits, but carries potentially live-ruining risks.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 10:31 PM
2

Which is either BS or Schrödinger's Rapist is reality.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 06:47 PM
0

1.: I was talking about nations not as in "A state" but as in "nationalism" meaning 1 stretch of land, 1 government, 1 people with the same language, history and culture. I am for a government. Just a worldwide one. 2.: He doesnt agree with me. He is clearly a nationalist: If you tolerate other people walking across your borders and making a home in your country, then like a fool and his money, you are easily parted from your land, culture and dignity. I do not believe in borders. I think all pe…
/r/MensRights16/09/12 01:49 PM
3

I'll sure you know him when you see him, what with the hideous growths on his head. Just be wary of people with Udder-shaped hats.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 05:01 AM
-1

violations to the sanctity of our nation Nations are a construct of a bygone age. Humanity matters. Nations do not. They are arbitrary borders that keep all of mankind from realizing its true potential. To illustrate this point I’m going to use an example of an unemployed man looking for a job. This point is BS. Nobody should be tolerant of extreme safety hazards, and nobody is asking for that, either. And what does "leaving a boring workplace" have to do with tolerance at all? The author seems …
/r/MensRights16/09/12 04:51 AM
6

I wouldnt say I know somebody I met the same evening.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 04:36 AM
16

Generally, I downvote if a post is: Intolerance (Racism, Religious intolerance, ...) Obvious trolling Plain stupid ("Why no abortions?" "Jesus said so!") Kindergarten style ("[Facts]" "Thats not correct" "Yes it is" "No it isnt"...) I upvote posts that: make a good point (even if it goes against my beliefs) are funny Everything else, I just leave alone.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:37 PM
2

Double click, right click, Google search, first site ;)
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:30 PM
4

I would say the reason are ridiculously open rape laws in Sweden. You can see it in the Assange case.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:28 PM
4

At least the comments in there are mostly rational. The blog post is utter BS. If you are paranoid, deal with it instead of projecting it onto every woman on the planet and saying it like it is the natural state of women or something.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 03:07 PM
93

"I wanted excitement and more affection. My husband is always busy or tired. Time's ticking by and I want something more." "My marriage is having problems. Should I talk to my partner about it? Nah, better fuck other people." "But you have to stay level headed. It would be easy to lose sight of who you are, your family and the people who need you." Oh, so she fucks around for her family and the people who need her. How lovely. There is no excuse for cheating. The reason for cheating is that the …
/r/MensRights15/09/12 02:32 PM
3

It is clear their cries are very real, and this isn't part of the "script." Yeah... no. From the vid they posted below, it looks like she was really choked and then had the normal reaction after that, which looks like crying. Most of the stuff is just shittily acted. Soon this will become the norm and porn watchers will be stimulated by women realistically "tapping out" because of so much fierce and intense physical abuse Really? Do they think this is new in any way? As for the actress' blog: Sh…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 01:26 PM
1

Nope, it wouldnt be accepted. Men reading it would be seen as rapists in the making, creepers, etc. And we could totally forget reading it in public. We'd probably be thrown out of wherever we'd read it.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 01:13 PM
1

It would have to appeal either to teenage girls, housewives or ideally both to get it published.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 01:11 PM
3

Divide et impera. As long as the rich keep the people under them (read: us) divided and squabbling over racism/sexism, they dont have to fear a revolution.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 04:40 AM
1

Nah, import some Chinese, I hear some people have very cheap rates at about 50€ per capita. You won't have to pay them anything beyond that, only feed and water them every few days. Just dont let the neighbours see them. They'd get jealous.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 04:34 AM
7

My mum was not allowed to take certain classes at school because 'they were for boys' and was trained as a secretary, the same as her sisters and her mother How old is your mom? Because that doesnt exist anymore (in the western world, anyways). Or do you mean that she was told so by her parents? Do the facts take into account the likelihood that they cannot choose jobs that require working at the weekend because they have a family and at least one parent has to be home at the weekend? One parent…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 04:32 AM
2

Well, it sure would "help" prosecutions and convictions rates if you define "help" as "bring as many people into prison as possible without just building a prison around the whole damn country".
/r/MensRights14/09/12 02:53 AM
1

Wow... I think you just solved crime. Gratulations, your Nobel Price should arrive per mail in the next 6 weeks or so.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 02:51 AM
-1

A better comparison would be like talking to Christian fundamentalists as a Pagan/Occult Practitioner. The times I've heard that Im possessed/Satanworshipper...
/r/MensRights14/09/12 01:17 AM
2

Basically: They want change through evolution instead of revolution. Except it doesnt work because the system is designed in a way that keeps it stable. It may transfer power from one group to another, but in the end you'll have one group without power and one group with power again.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 01:06 AM
7

I think he basically means erotica with that content. I say as long as nobody is harmed in the making, porn should be legal. Loli/written Pedo-Porn doesnt hurt anybody, therefore it should be legal, it can even prevent child abuse (a fapping pedo is a pedo that isnt fucking children)
/r/MensRights13/09/12 12:38 PM
2

As women, we are always trying to be sympathetic: STOP If a male is sitting alone in the seat nearest your car, you may want to walk back into the mall, or work, and get aguard/policeman to walk you back out. Thats are the only ones that bother me really. (Well the "women are victims" thing going on in all of isnt nice either) Oh, and this: If you are ever thrown into the trunk of a car, kick out the back tail lightsand stick your arm out the hole and start waving like crazy I have never seen a …
/r/MensRights13/09/12 09:25 AM
12

I'm the mother so I know whats best for him Really is the stupidest statement a parent can make. No, you dont. The child is a different person, you do not know whats "best" for him. Especially when you dont even have your own experiences with the thing in question.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 09:14 AM
3

As long as that page has pictures/adresses it should be closed. It very much endangers people. And what does "suspected" pedophile mean anyways? Who "suspects" it?
/r/MensRights13/09/12 09:10 AM
11

And again somebody is redefining terms that are clearly and logically defined. But, hey, logic=patriarchy
/r/MensRights13/09/12 09:03 AM
8

If they already approach you with that shit, you can retaliate in kind, imho.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 12:53 AM
1

It isnt. Cultural relativism is needed in a multicultural world. Ask any anthropologist.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:27 PM
1

Race is too broad for this. Being proud of your family heritage makes sense because it is close to you. Being proud of the accomplishments of your race is just far fetched. What did a guy that lived 200 years ago in a totally different part of the world, that you have no blood connection to (Ok, you probably had a blood connection some 1000s of years ago) have to do with you? Nothing. Being proud of your culture is dangerous, but understandable. It can lead very easily to a belief of cultural su…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:16 PM
1

It makes no sense to be proud of your ethnicity at all (and that goes for all races). Its random.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:19 PM
5

I usually reserve rational and polite posts for people who are rational and polite. If somebody attacks me, I respond in kind.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:16 PM
6

I think today was the day meant for me to be a d-bag to the male race d-bag to the male race male race ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:49 PM
1

Mao didnt massacre tens of millions, he just made some poor choices with the farming reforms and believed the local officials their grain harvest numbers without checking. The ones that did die directly were mostly counter-revolutionary elements. Granted, he was pretty hard againt political enemies. His ego was way too big to have that kind of power. And it has nothing to do with the fact that he was atheist.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:44 PM
1

-_- Our math teacher expected that of us. In High School. Fun times. High Intelligence be praised, I came out with a 3 in the end (1 good, 5 fucked). With barely any studying whatsoever.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 02:24 AM
10

survivors This is one of the things that bugs me most, really. Why the fuck is it "rape survivor" not "rape victim"? Rapists dont commonly kill their victims.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:23 AM
2

there are a lot more people that obviously, awkwardly, and uncomfortably hit on you Happens mostly because women are still kind of a rarity in geek groups (geeky women often form their own). Just stick through it, crack some jokes, decline advances nicely and you'll be "one of the dudes" in no time. there's always quite a few that will ream you on your geek credentials, and when you fail, proceed to convert to total jerk. Defense mechanism. Since being a "geek" has become somewhat "cool", there …
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:46 PM
7

Historically, they have won the lottery That is BS. Italians shouldnt complain, they had the Roman Empire. Iraq? Why do they complain, they had Sumer! North Korea? They should shut up, they had Goryeo.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:45 PM
1

38 year old has had 12 sexual partners I wouldnt say that is much. For a 38 year old, that isnt much. For an 18 year old it definitely is.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:37 PM
3

What people should base their fears of infidelity on is whether or not their partner has a history of cheating, not how many people they've been intimate with. Ideally, they should do that. Most people dont do such things consciously, though.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:09 PM
20

Few women are published in the science fiction genre Couldnt possibly be that less women write science fiction. Its the evil patriarchy keeping them down! Several people (online and off) bullied and insulted a feminist skeptics group called the Skepchicks in the year before the con and during the con Totally isnt because they are basically a hate-group.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:53 PM
8

I think theres a simple reason: People with many sex partners are perceived as more likely to be unfaithful. In my experience, this is spot on, as long as the living conditions havent changed substantially.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:25 PM
14

It seems like they lost their heads when under stress.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:20 PM
16

TL;DR: Patriarchy is magic.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:19 PM
2

He probably would yell the same if you said no. And yes, it is bad and it shouldnt happen. But in the end, you cant police people into behaving 100% correct and be nice to people. As for being afraid: I do understand why a weaker person might be afraid of a stronger one. However, being constantly afraid of about 50% of the population is no way to live. Nearly all men wont assault you (Stalkers probably would), and the ones that yell at you like that wont do it either. They are just assholes and …
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:10 PM
4

But stalking is predictive of escalation into violence, as is street harassment -_- Is she seriously comparing catcalling to somebody that follows you around everywhere, leaves a message on your phone every 5 minutes and is watching you sleep through the window? Because that would be stupid.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 11:31 PM
6

The problem lies with what they consider sexual harassment. I've seen women saying sexual harassment is looking at them or talking to them. Or offering assistence when their car broke down. Saying its sexual harassment because they get called names is most likely incorrect too, since they arent called these names for being a woman, but for upsetting whoever says them.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 11:27 PM
2

there are no mens' movements of note. Move along, nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 07:58 PM
2

Its only not rape if the women comes up to you and starts to have sex. Even then, it might still be rape if she regrets it later.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 07:53 PM
8

Hypersensitive persons shouldnt become judges. Or anything that deals with people, really.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 07:42 PM
1

The ability for male characters to not wear certain items is unfortunate but is not close to the same as FORCING women to wear high heels ...So forcing (fictional) women to wear something is bad, forcing (fictional) men to wear something is pretty ok. The transphobia and misogyny in this thread even after a few short days is very telling. Literally one comment mentions crossdressing. Not even in a negative tone.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 01:00 PM
1

Or beards. Most games have no/shitty beard options.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 01:00 PM
10

But women in prostitution and pornography often parrot a positive message about their degradation It could not possibly be that they have different thoughts on something they have experienced, right? All women are part of the Hivemind, arent they? . For example, she admits that 99% of the orgasms in pornography are faked. This contradicts her earlier statement that she experienced an orgasm in 3/4 of the scenes she participated in Wait, are you saying actors are acting? I am shocked. SHOCKED. -_…
/r/MensRights09/09/12 03:39 AM
5

Honestly, if you voluntarily sign a contract saying you have to fuck whoever the other signee says, then you gave consent. Its not rape.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 03:32 AM
10

If you enter a shitty job for a good paycheck you pretty much do what most people end up doing.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 03:30 AM
24

Also, big meetings/festivals are required to provide toilets for everybody. You could probably sue because of unsanitary conditions or something.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 03:22 AM
1

Communism is for the equality of all people. What exactly would conflict with MR there?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:30 PM
5

"I chased him," she said. "He fell on the ground. He started cussing. I shot his sexual organ this time. He became quiet. I knew he was dead. I then cut his head off." Up until that point, her actions could have been justified. Following the guy, shooting him again isnt. Beheading isnt either.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 02:36 PM
1

On the internet, this would be fairly hard. Best bet would be something like having to submit a drivers license or something before being granted posting rights.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 11:56 AM
6

Even if she did, it doesnt matter. Killing an attacker in self-defense is regrettable, but understandable. Going to somebody, shooting and mutilating him isnt.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 11:32 AM
2

Because prisoners arent people.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 04:05 AM
0

Eh, it was needed at the time. Lenin had, after a lengthy civil war and crop outages, the choice to either let the people suffer because of the longer response time strong soviets would bring and maybe even let counterrevolutionary elements bring back the Czar, or weaken the soviets, weather the crisis under his rule and after the country is better prepared to move into socialism make that move. The only problem was that he died before he could realize his plan and that Stalin was a major dickba…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:43 AM
2

... Please read the "Capital", some Lenin, Trotsky, etc. before calling the USSR leftist. Because it wasnt. The USSR started socialist under Lenin but became pretty much fascist state capitalism under Stalin.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:18 AM
27

As a rabid leftist, I must deny this. They just hate free speech, period.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:17 AM
2

Some male only buildings exist here and there, but feminists are always trying to shut them down. Your best bet to get into a male only club that will stay that way is to get a few billions in the bank, for the rich there are some exclusive clubs that do that.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 01:22 AM
43

[...] should have mentioned he was my ex-husband. [...] So if I destroyed shit it was mine to destroy Because property rights transfer to you after marriage? No, what belonged to you before it still belongs to you after it. Even if it is shared right, none of the owners has the right to destroy stuff without the others consent.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 06:23 PM
3

Dont know. I do know that the women were the first to switch to Christianity among the german tribes and the vikings, though.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 06:19 PM
3

Depends on what gender you mean. Fortune 500 bosses are the standard for males, homeless refugees that get raped daily the standard for females. /s, obviously.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:05 PM
0

Yes, you can. But with guns you can kill whole groups of people and that is my problem.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:56 PM
3

Because terrorists are magic.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 02:42 PM
8

He was a hobo painter here. The germans decided to elect that guy.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 02:37 PM
-1

you have to have a CCW permit in the states to conceal carry bladed weapons that meet certain size requirements, too Woah, didnt know that. Bladed weapons, I understand, for defense. Guns: No way. Guns are just too capable at killing to hand them to everybody.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:34 AM
2

I know hate is toxic It really isnt. Let it be a driving force (well, not to murder or something like that), get strength from it. Hate was one of the main things I've drawn energy from in the past. Its like a white-hot flame burns in your chest. A nice feeling and a great source of motivation and strength. We have a parenting agreement, a legal document, that stipulates how far we can take the kids and for how long. She broke this, obviously I am fairly sure you can start an appeal for sole cus…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:28 AM
5

well you're an exception, the rest are sick fucks Funnily enough, that is the exact same line of reasoning I'm hearing from the Nazis: "These muslims are all criminal shitholes, we should throw them out of the country. Except Ali here, the only muslim I know, and he is the only exception"
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:15 AM
1

-__- We had weapons readily avaible for everybody for thousands of years. It didnt really work out. And guns are a lot (A LOT) deadlier than any of these were. A rapist usually doesnt go around advertising he is going to rape you. If you get raped, its probably gonna be a sneak attack or in a situation where you dont have the gun on you.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:12 AM
2

So over time, with enough time spent on 'hardcore' porn, you can associate feeling turned on with women who aren't enjoying sex. Doesnt work like that. Even rape porn is very, very different from rape. In the end it is acted in a way that makes it more enjoyable to the viewer, just like normal porn And if you are talking about normal BDSM: The women are enjoying it and you can see it. Honestly, it sounds like you never watched either one and just assumed.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:07 AM
1

I think you can find that out by looking about what some of them have to say about the women that murdered and mutilated her alleged rapist. Hint: It would involve long periods of torture, slow death and instant guilty after the accusation.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:01 AM
5

Could be he was just dumbfounded at the fountain of shit that just came out of his wives mouth.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:57 AM
19

And if the dog starts talking you know that that sweet you ate was really acid.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:42 PM
2

Turkey isnt that backwards, its like Europe with tanned people (in most parts)
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:37 PM
9

This didnt happen in some extremely backwards montain village. It was a fairly modern area. Not every muslim country is necessarily backwards.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:33 PM
4

A lot of the people in the linked topic, apparently.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:31 PM
22

the fact that she was raped Its not a fact. Its a claim made by a psychotic murderer and she brought no evidence to support it.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:30 PM
5

Some people cry during sex. Its just like people crying while laughing.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:50 AM
9

He reads like a caring but inexperienced person to me, honestly. He probably just didnt know what was going on, so he asked for her go-ahead and she gave it.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:50 AM
5

Basically, if you arent psychic you may be a rapist.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:49 AM
4

Well, she also recounted how he would have sex with her while she was asleep, and she'd wake up to him already having sex with her Not necessarily. She could have given him a general go-ahead for this. The article doesnt state if she has and by his behavior she describes in the article I am guessing he asked first.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:47 AM
9

Does it count that I stopped thinking I was “having sex” and started thinking “I was being had sex with”? A torn cervix, does it count? In her own words: he asked if he should keep going. Keep going, I’d say. So no, it doesnt count. You cant withdraw consent after the act. What is the difference between saying “No, no, no,” and praying the man you trust will stop when he sees you crying? The one is communicating to the other person that you want to stop and the other is relaying it to a third en…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:45 AM
1

What would you call democracy?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:15 AM
0

Live by a code oh honor, not a code of vengence And if my code of honour were to include vengeance?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:11 AM
-2

Violence is a tool. Tools can be used for good or bad.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:10 AM
18

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable"
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:09 AM
23

Charge $5 for the first infraction and double it for each subsequent one. I bet the Goonsquad would be loving this one. If somebody beats you, just call upon your 2000+ guildbuddies and report the guy into bankruptcy.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:05 AM
10

Men have more power than women: financially, politically, and physically All that homeless men surely appreciate their financial and political superiority. If you don't treat women with courtesy and respect... Read: If you dont treat women like special little snowflakes that break at the slightest sign of stress... Some of you might think it's sexist that I'm dumping this problem on us men. No. No, I think its sexist that he says its just men. There are no women that are just egoistic shitbags? …
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:00 AM
8

But seriously, that person was using cherry-picked statistics, the same thing he/she accused you of A pattern I've noticed with feminists arguments against MR: Just genderswap them and they apply 100% to Feminism.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 03:43 AM
35

Pff, accused of hating all women? I've been accused of beeing "pro rape" before. Never knew rape was open to debate. That there is a "pro rape" and "contra rape" standpoint.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 03:41 AM
2

To these ‘men’ women are little more than avaricious, parasitic wombs. All women are the enemy. They corrupt and enervate, sapping male vitality. In their reddit groups and blogs they trade stories of the oppression they suffer at the hands of women. In this endless feedback loop of pathetic rage they convince themselves that every problem in their life can be traced back to the pernicious influence of women. They see themselves as rebels against a degenerate feminised society. Is it just me or …
/r/MensRights04/09/12 10:24 PM
2

very serious failing of the far left Dont make it about political spectrums. Gender equality is a concern for both sides.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 06:51 PM
1

say that she deserves no penalty I dont. She is insane, and as a result of that she needs to be locked away until she is no danger for her fellow humans. Taking away someones freedom does count as a penalty in my book. As I said, lock her up in prison for the normal amount of time for murder, then transfer her to a clinic until she is cured.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 06:06 PM
1

Yeah, its much better to stick her in prison for a few months so she can go out and cut another guys penis off. Such people are mentally disturbed. They need help. A sane person doesnt go cut people genitalia off.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 05:45 PM
7

Enough prison is enough. Actually, no it isnt. Enough prison followed by life-long psychiatric treatment is enough. This women is a danger to any man she meets and is obviously mentally disturbed. Lock her in a clinic, give her the treatment she needs and keep her away from men. Not that any of that would ever happen, since he totally hurt her feelings. My guess: Maybe, if we're lucky, a year in jail.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 02:43 PM
4

Men have more rights than women on a systematic level Yeah, that is exactly why we have women's ministries, womens centers, womens housing... Oh, and I am sure that is a happy thought for the homeless guys "Oh, I am freezing my ass of FOR EQUALITY. LET ME PAY FOR WHAT OTHERS HAVE DONE"
/r/MensRights04/09/12 02:32 PM
3

I do not know why anybody would want to marry except for divorce benefits. It doesnt really give advantages (well, slight tax benefits in the US).
/r/MensRights04/09/12 04:19 AM
1

So, she shot and dismembered him for raping her? Wonder how she would like to get her finger/toenails pulled out and every bone in her body broken for murder (adjusted to fit the severity of the crime) in retaliation? Oh, I forgot, everybody is supposed to forget that she murdered somebody because she screamed rape. My guess: She is insane, maybe imagined a rape, maybe just wanted to murder a guy, killed somebody and now tries to get out of it by pulling the rape card. I saved my honour Oh, this…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 03:40 AM
5

When she appeared in court the next day in the town of Orihuela, she was cheered and clapped by a crowd, who shouted "Bravo!" and "Well done!" Thats disgusting. I hope she get a good long sentence for that.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 01:04 AM
7

You cant kill people for upsetting you. The world would be devoid of life.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 01:03 AM
6

Because a lot of people apparently think its ok to light rapists on fire -and rapists means men to a lot of people (I dare say do the same to a female that raped a male and you would see lynchmobs instead of cheering crowds)
/r/MensRights04/09/12 01:02 AM
4

I have a better idea: How about 2 separate governments, either government controls 1 gender and has its own laws applicable to that gender. Everything would work so much smoother /s
/r/MensRights04/09/12 12:50 AM
13

Then she'd get flak from the feminists for locking women in the kitchen.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 09:52 PM
5

bacon dispensers ... Go get working on that. The world needs this.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 09:51 PM
6

Except throwing somebody out of your apartment and landing them in prison are slightly different. Yes, personal standards are important. But either discuss them beforehand or dont be absolutely outraged when they get broken, especially when they arent societal standards.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 09:49 PM
18

'Who the hell uses his tongue on the first kiss?' After courting his girlfriend for five months First kiss after 5 months, both are not exactly teenagers anymore... Seriously? Who gets so upset over a friggin french kiss? They arent in highschool , tongue isnt slutty anymore.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 09:48 PM
1

Makes sense. The longer you wait the better you know the partner, meaning less of a chance of sticking your dick in crazy.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 03:48 PM
2

But, hey, instead you get incompetent, uninterested women who dont know what else to do. Its a fair trade-off isnt it?
/r/MensRights03/09/12 02:51 AM
9

The "maybe she has a reason", "he doesnt treat her right" shit riles me up the most. Really? You are in a bad relationship and cheat instead of, you know, leave? And then its suddenly allowed? Fuck that.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 10:06 PM
34

This. People dont learn if you ignore them. Tell him the truth and he wont run into the same problem with the next girl he has a crush on. I have no problem if a potential love interest tells me she isnt interested. I am quite pissed if she makes bullshit excuses. Oh, and its quite ironical that they are calling for him to "man up" so she doesnt have to.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:11 PM
7

People who are as easily threatened shouldnt be judges. Why does somebody who pisses himself when someone says something in an angry tone become a fucking judge of all things? Get a job as an office clerk or something.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 02:02 PM
12

Great article, though, I have to say that there are women who can fit fine into male groups. I knew a girl in highschool that was basically a dude from her behaviour. She was also treated like a dude and absolutely included. She was totally excluded by any female groups for this, though.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 06:49 PM
11

She thinks: “What a nice guy …” He thinks: “… is she drunk enough?” Don't forget, kids: All men are sexual predators waiting to happen! Girls should always and only think of themselves BS. A relationship is about making compromises and satisfying both parties. If one part of a relationship only thinks abou themselves, the other part should get out. Fast. “If sex is achieved through begging and pleading (…) then it is rape”, says the campaign expert and psycho-therapist Monica Mardell. If women c…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 06:27 PM
2

And that is why nationalism is bad, m'kay?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:12 PM
-1

Same for me. His comment is the only "sane" one of the bunch. I hate it when I have to agree with economical feudalists.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:10 PM
2

Same for me. It fucking sucks.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:07 PM
2

Have a taste: All men should undergo castration. It would be a festive celebration, each month. Each town under guidelines from the goverment would provide this service to all men. Each month a letter would be sent to a selected female, much like jury duty. If the female elected to be a castrator, she would arrive at the site where the selected men are waiting. All males would be castrated regardless of age from young to old. A parade would start the celebration with all men still intact but com…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:01 PM
1

/sarcasm
/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:54 AM
41

I laughed. ... I'll show myself out now.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:55 PM
2

Also, other hard things that we won't mention here.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:54 PM
4

Look over at /r/atheism to see how skeptics can look.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:47 PM
2

"SHE'S A WITCH"
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:39 PM
3

Well, at least I know what team not to support in the future.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 05:31 PM
15

Thas called being irish/british. Also, they are young. Like 12-14. And malnourished. Never forget what a one-sided diet can do to your body. Its the reason germanic warriors looked like a stringy muscles all over.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 05:25 PM
0

That reminds me of that feminist that wanted to abort her teenage son for watching porn. Edit: Thanks for the pointer. Goddamn brainfarts.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:19 PM
3

I deal with it the same way I deal with capitalists: Dont hate the people, hate the ideology. Most people are just victims of said ideology. If you get indoctrinated from birth, you'll start believing whatever they tell you.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:22 PM
4

And why exactly should a female option be put on the ballot? Just for "equality"? Because unless that female option is better (granted, not exactly hard) nothing would be gained.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:13 PM
8

By the time the main course arrived, Anna had told Chris exactly what he was doing wrong in his career, made jokes about his dress sense and criticised his choice of car Haha, yeah, how could anybody not want a women who starts bitching about everything you are in the first 30 minutes you know her? Another problem I've noticed: Women tend to way, way overestimate their attractiveness. They often exclusively go for guys that are (perceived) as extremely attractive, intelligent, accomplished, etc.…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 03:16 AM
1

Porn is, if anything, good for relationships. Unless the sexual urges of both partners match exactly, one of them is going to want more. And somebody who faps to porn, doesnt go out and have an affair.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:36 AM
1

Yeah, it is really funny how I am rude to people that automatically assume I hate them because of how they were born.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:30 AM
3

Funny. I never saw the feminists complaining that most men in video games are 3m tall hunks of muscle. Seriously, these muscles are bigger than the average head The video is really hard to listen to btw. The voice is very monotonous, its very obvious the text is read and the jumping between Clips and the creators voice is distracting as well. As for a TL;DR of the vid: Men are sexualized in Games as well, women need less exposed flesh to get sexually excited than men, therefore women wear less t…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:26 AM
13

nah, when its done by a women its called "empowering"
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:15 AM
2

if you should defend a friend if there were reports of him sexually assaulting someone, with the implied answer being that you should not. Bad advice. Always stick to your friends, always help them. Same goes for family.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:12 PM
6

Exactly as the feminists want it. Even if you are only accused of being a rapist, your life shall be ruined as if you had been found guilty.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:15 AM
6

Pro-tip: Make Abortion legal for everybody. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 09:26 PM
1

First rule of dates: Never date a feminist. Never go home with a feminist. Never talk to a feminist without witnesses.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 01:55 PM
23

Every sane being that doesnt want to stop every 2 seconds to ask "Is it okay? Can I continue?"?
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:40 PM
16

If you initiate sexual actions and then the partner does something you dont like, say something to indicate that, mayhaps. That would be a vastly preferable solution to "ask for every single step".
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:12 PM
28

gross What a good reason to cut off a body part. I find feet gross, so should I cut off my kid's feet?
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:13 PM
3

Both boys and girls had their own separate hallways for overnight, however the boys were stricly told they were NOT allowed in the girls hallway, or we would be sent home. The girls were perfectly allowed to come into our hallway. Huh, same in my school. We did Skiing trips, and as a boy was seen in the girls hallway ALL students were called to a room, and everybody had to listen as the teachers threatened the guy with sending him home for about 2 hours. Girls also got better rooms. Guys had bed…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:33 AM
9

Update: Prostitutes express their gratitude to wives as they become the richest profession.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 09:25 PM
7

Nicolae was later taken to hospital with half a dozen knife wounds. Wow. If the genders would have been reversed, the author would've called for the perpetrators head on a spike. And the comments too.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:57 PM
1

Website that supports rapists branded ‘disgusting' Where's Captain Obvious when you need him? As for the article: Paywall/Loginwall.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:10 AM
6

She said that she thought he was her rapist with insufficient confidence that he was. She is at least as much at fault as the legal system.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:00 AM
5

A lesser man would make a recliner from her skin. Honestly, I would probably do something like that. Over 20 years is an awfully long time to loose, all the while this stupid women is free.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:25 PM
6

But if that girl has any sort of character If she had, would she have accused him because he looked familiar?
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:22 PM
4

And this is why ladies and gentlemen you do NOT consent to searches, lineups, questions, or anything else from law enforcement unless there is a warrant or a lawyer present. This. Know your rights. Dont cooperate unnecessarily and, most importantly: Don't trust the police. They are the enforcers of the rich and powerful. They are there to keep you down (whatever purpose they fulfill beyond that is another debate).
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:20 PM
9

The first paragraph was a joke. Should probably have written /s or something, in retrospect.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:12 PM
4

Rape kills people Thats murder, silly.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:37 PM
9

Well, time to start tripping into her stuff and accidently flushing the toilet after her jewelry fell into it. Or leave that crazy bitch. That could work too.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:32 PM
3

The total purge, according to Clark, is necessary to achieve that ideal female-friendly atmosphere Hey, I agree. And a total female free environement is needed for the ideal male-friendly atmosphere. Let's start on that wall. Now, is it going to be around the equator or through the poles? Either way, men get Europe.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:46 PM
14

I think it really depends on how he got this high number of sex-partners. If he had sex with women who want one-night stands: Great for him. If he acted as if he wanted a relationship beyond sex: Dickmove. They're basically assuming that it was the second option, because girls are all innocent and chaste.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:40 PM
9

This. There are so many different possibilities with rape, differentiation is a must, really.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:35 PM
8

Relevant But, yeah, its silly to say that men should never hit on women, since the woman may be crazy/paranoid. Where would that train of thought end? Men not being allowed to leave the house until nightfall so they dont run into any women?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:57 AM
7

I find the comments of "females that rape men should be paid child support by them if they get pregnant" a lot scarier than this. Still bad.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:44 PM
0

Where exactly did I say that any type of rape "doesnt count"? I said there need to be differences, not that some rapes dont count. And with the first paragraph I was referring to stuff like "Its rape if you ask twice" or "its rape if she had one beer". That is what feminists qualify as rape too. And that isnt rape.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:36 PM
0

That their [womens] understanding of rape must be qualified by some higher, wiser authority Honestly, when I am seeing what feminists call rape, I am wondering if that wouldnt be a bad idea. Imagine being tied up there and imagine some aggressive, indifferent, insane stranger Since when does "tied up" not count as forceful? Spend your energy going after those perpetrators Because hunting rapists is the job of politicans. The police? Eating donuts or something I guess. Yes, what he said was large…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:09 AM
4

Fighting stance, 360° to see if there is an attacker, after noticing that there is nothing ask her whats wrong and see if I can calm her down. I wouldnt even have the idea that I may be the reason she's hiding. Granted, I can look slightly fearsome with 190cm, beard and a knife on the belt (I am living on the country, it can be a useful tool and its a nice old tradition that only a few people follow anymore).
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:50 PM
10

Was it fair for men to do such damage to a woman that she cannot help but see us as a danger? Is it rational for a woman who has experienced this violence to deny its likelihood? "Men" didnt do the damage (if there actually is damage and not just paranoia), a single perpetrator or a tiny group did it. And the "likelihood" of getting raped is actually fairly tiny. male class You fail. "Male" isnt a class. "Female" isnt a class. That are sexes.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:31 PM
1

If you can't respect other peoples' rights, why should they respect yours? Human rights. You dont become anything other than human when doing a crime, therefore you have human rights. Granted, theres no right to privacy in there. Still, you dont loose all your rights as you suggested.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:21 PM
-1

A crime doesnt invalidate all your rights. Actually, it doesnt invalidate any, other than the one for freedom of movement, for the duration needed to reform a criminal. The two boys had a right to privacy, that she violated.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:09 PM
-1

Should then the accused/criminals be able to publish the names of their victims or their adress? Free speech needs to have certain limits.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:00 PM
1

Look, I dislike governments as much as you do, but do you seriously say its morally correct to ruin somebody whole life because he did something stupid as a teenager?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:41 PM
1

Yeah, that kind of thing should be heavily punished. I am betting there will be more such cases in the future because of this.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:27 PM
8

This means that more young women will be subjected to grueling trials, As it should be. Seriously, you have to have a trial.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:24 PM
16

Which would still qualify as hate crime.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:20 PM
2

Sometimes, to preserve some hope for humanity, I just imagine feminists are saying all that stuff ironically, but they are really bad at making that clear.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 09:33 AM
2

I still dont understand how people can be stupid enough to practically post the crime they're gonna commit on Facebook "So maybe I am too idealistic, but I believe way deep inside me that we can make things better for everyone. I will be a catalyst. I will do what it takes. I will. Watch me."
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:35 AM
2

In contrast, we do know that a women's studies major gives you encyclopedic knowledge about absolutely everything.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:48 AM
3

I want a world where my daughter is able to walk down the street without the fear of being assaulted, because those who would harm her are locked away where they belong. That won't happen. Ever. You would have to lock literally everybody but your daughter up. Theres no (real) chance to predict a crime before it happens.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:08 PM
1

Ah darnit, Im always forgetting number 3. Maybe I should write on the back of my hand or something.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:02 PM
14

stop molesting/assaulting/raping/beating I am sure this firefighter (or was it the nurse?) does all of these on a daily basis. I mean, how else would you get a job in which working with people is paramount. stop standing by while other men molest/assault/rape/beat Again, I am sure he sees people doing this all day long. Look out of your window? What are you seeing? If you dont see at least 10 women getting molested/assaulted/raped/beaten you are a mysoginist. And probably a rapist too. What’s ne…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:57 PM
0

Again - it isnt a child. Its a pile of cells. Certain rights? Nope. None. Cells dont have rights. And I am one of the people that believe that babies until about 3 years old shouldnt be considered full persons either, and only have very limited rights.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:35 AM
9

I believe that the story was that the condom broke inside her. If so, that doesnt constitute rape in any way, as thats always a risk with condoms.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:20 AM
2

You are making a fairly critical mistake in your argument: You assume its a human. It isnt. It has the potential to become human, but it currently isnt. To grow to its full size, it would have to majorly inconvencience a human. Therefore if this human, the host, doesnt want it, it should be aborted. That said, maybe we'll get artifical wombs in the future.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:16 AM
9

Buy yourself a sex toy, it is much safer Logically, he is right with that. No matter how small the chance is of actually getting a false accusation/ripped off in divorce by women, for sex toys the chances are null. Granted, it seems extreme. I prefer celibacy.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:11 AM
1

Agreed, more or less. Not wholly remove the chance to report a rape, but coming from such a person there should be a way, way more thorough investigation before going anywhere near a court.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:33 AM
3

The funny thing is that the judge all but says it outright: one cant compare the Situation of these Men with that of young women from eastern Europe
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:28 PM
2

Full Translation (excuse any errors, translating can get confusing at times): They are 19 and 20 years old, look pale and a lot younger and speak no German. An Interpretor translates for them, that the Court sentenced them to seven and eight years in prison for malicious(insidious?) murder, because they killed Renaldas D. 37. The Man, that sold them as sex objects to other man. Both have confessed to have killed Renaldas D. They were in a "very encumbering" Situation, but the chamber didnt belie…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:10 PM
13

No it doesnt. But it is very possible that she gave consent throughout their relationship to this type of thing.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 02:15 PM
0

She didnt die and he had a wound. Theres quite a bit of difference. If somebody hits you in the face and you hit them back until they arent capable of hitting anymore, is that too much retaliation?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:22 AM
0

I can't be the only one who finds it strange that the fact that Rihanna instigated the violence is never mentioned in any of these articles, right? Not strange at all. It's easier to sell a story with a clear bad guy to people. This doesn't change the fact that Brown shouldn't have reacted violently Why shouldnt he have reacted to violence with violence?
/r/MensRights19/08/12 08:45 PM
1

I agree with you. the problem is that a lot of people go over-the-top with the attacker-hating and see them as non-human.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 07:14 PM
-8

Should that be true, she got what she deserved.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 07:13 PM
10

I learned to knock and then take several steps back from the door so as not to startle people. This is extremely sad. Why should anybody have to make accomodations to racism? It comes back to the central question: do we want women to be more comfortable? Yes, we do. Thats why we should teach them that not every man is a rapist. As for the other article: A dog that acts clearly irrational and has foam at his mouth is very different from a normal person. By all means, fear a big person that acts c…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 01:48 PM
11

Thats a sad sight to see. A draft is nothing but state-sanctioned slavery.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 05:02 PM
5

as a 6'2'' I have to say: It is. Damned midgets, I'm always tripping over you. ;)
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:03 PM
-1

very unlikely hypothetical future war ... The US will most likely fall apart in the next 100 years and the death-throes of empires have traditionally been extremely violent. It isnt a question of "if" at this point, its a question of "when". Edit: Thanks for pointing that out.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:01 PM
4

Of course you should be cautious, but the article is basically saying that anybody who ever does something nice is a child molester.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:55 PM
8

TRICKY PEOPLE are grown-ups who ASK KIDS FOR HELP (no adult needs to ask a kid for help) That surely cant go wrong. There totally are no cases of old people falling down, heart attacks or similiar events that could cause such a thing. Be suspicious of gifts that adults in positions of authority give your kids. There’s no reason your son should be coming back from Bar Mitzvah study with a cool new keychain or baseball hat. You know that weird adult cousin of yours who’s always out in the yard wit…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:09 PM
2

completely misdirected attempt to bring attention to their platform which has little to know reference within the context of Fringe platform which has little to know reference within the context of Fringe little to know reference know ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:02 PM
1

I actually pee sitting down because when I'm extremely tired/drunk I would miss and only when I habitually sit down there isnt a mess to clean up afterwards.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:00 PM
15

This. My country has conscription (heres a tip how to avoid it: You'll be evaluated by a doctor. They will take your blood pressure. Beforhand, you should drink only very, very little for 1.5-2 days.). A few years back, somebody wanted to install conscription for females as well as males. Feminists cried bloody murder, how it would "keep women from getting a job", how it "slavery", how it is "sending women away to be raped" (nevermind that actually participating in combat missions outside of my …
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:01 PM
3

Thats what pisses me off the most. They evidently believed that this policy would bring them positive attention, since just writing a quick program that checks the gender of a customer before issuing a ticket and simply not giving males a seat besides unacompanied children, they chose a ay to enforce this that is more cost-intensive and complicated.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 12:44 AM
35

abnormal The problem lies simply therein that people assume "abnormal" is bad. Why should it be? People are different. It's a fact.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 02:42 AM
10

Ah, and herein lies the problem. Feminism (mostly) defines equality as equality of outcome. According to most people here, equality is equality of opportunity. For example: In my country, 21% of IT-university graduates are women. Feminists would say that that isnt equality. MRAs would say that it is equal, since both gender can get into university equally.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 11:35 PM
3

When people who aren't accustomed to having large amounts of money get them, they blow through them incredibly quickly. The problem often is that they donate to charitys, give to friends and of course buy themselves expensive cars, houses, yachts without regard that these possessions have to be maintained. What one needs to do if he gets much one, would be to calculate how much money one needs per month and then look for a bank with a good interest rate and a secure future, then give enough mone…
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:58 PM
5

You need to think on a bigger timescale. No one of us is likely to see true equality in his lifetime. Besides, I would use the same theory here as Marx used for capitalism, in short: "Things have to get worse before they get better". Wait until feminists take over more and more, then people will automatically realize what happens, few at first. There will be revolutions, and hopefully some of us who have realized what is happening earlier, will still be there too.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:49 PM
6

My wife can't share some of the best pics and videos of our children with our friends and family via the internet because no matter where we post it it gets removed. .rar and password it, then they cant check contents.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 11:37 AM
-1

Wanna make a pot so we all can throw our money together and buy us an island?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 01:34 AM
8

These types of feminists always love to scream "CONTEXT" at you when they realize they dont have any rational argument whatsoever. "Context" has simply replaced other conversation-enders like "I dont want to talk about this anymore" or "Enough of this argument". Ironically, while screaming it at you, they completely ignore any context whatsoever.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 10:18 PM
3

Not you, OP. There were a few others that were like "we should get more blacks as a shield against people saying MRA is white-only", which is obviously treating people like interest groups and making the bad assumption that people are ambassadors of the groups they belong to. "positive racism" is reeinforcing a specific race. For example, only hiring black people or saying "Asians are good at math".
/r/MensRights11/08/12 01:51 PM
3

To all the people saying the MRA community should reach out more to "people of color": No, we shouldnt. Positive Racism is still racism. Treat people as human, the color doesnt matter.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 12:08 PM
4

Now if we push the 'X' it would still stand as 'X' so it is stable. While if we push 'Y' it falls flat. So women are more stable than men. Wat? Seriously, if you failed Biology 101, dont write about genes. Just dont.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 12:01 PM
3

Relevance to MR: Feminists claim Prostitution is Rape, unnatural Study proves otherwise.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 12:00 PM
2

The author of that article really should talk to a working-class male sometimes. Reading that, it sounds like all males are at least millionaires.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 11:55 AM
1

Since its 5am here: Link
/r/MensRights11/08/12 02:46 AM
1

Could have sworn I typed an "e"^ Anyways, I wasnt talking about his religion. I was talking about him trying to connect to the "normal" American by telling them how he is friends with NASCAR owners, crying about how he was such a poor college student that he nearly had to work, and making jokes about how his father fired a bunch of workers. Aside from that, he is the worst liar ever. He tells the most blatant lies and expects people to just nod and agree. Oh, and he managed to make all of Britai…
/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:57 PM
3

Trends Don't Make a Matriarchy So, basically, the facts of society dont make a matriarchy. What does then? The complementary tampons? The greeting card?
/r/MensRights10/08/12 10:00 PM
5

The problem is that he is. Romney is a deluded idiot and Obama is..., well, a politican. He grovels to the interest groups that he knows to bring him a majority of votes.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 09:57 PM
26

So, I guess its also OK to hit all those woment that "test" their boyfriends by throwing attractive female friends at him until they cheat?
/r/MensRights10/08/12 04:59 PM
46

The problem is that (a lot of) feminists believe that women can't be made responsible for their actions. Kind of like mentally impaired people.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 04:58 PM
4

As a Marxist, I would really love to hear what words we "redefined" or how we twist reality. And Marxism is about teaching people how to act as a part of humanity, instead of a single ego. To help others, and bring humanity into a brighter future for everybody.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 01:05 PM
3

Women will only be equal when 100% of jobs with public attention/nice offices are staffed by women.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 12:34 PM
3

While I dont think it was pedophilia, its really fucked up. I would consider it stalking, honestly.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 05:35 PM
12

"I find it threatening " is actually nothing. Some people find black people threatening. Should we ban black people? What someone "finds" is irrelevant. The question the law needs to ask is if it IS threatening. Never got how somebody could seriously say "I find this threatening" or "I find this offensive" and expect anybody to care.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 11:44 AM
5

I'd just buy an Island, build a giant wall around it and a tower in the middle. Then set Samsung Sniper Drones on the wall. Nothing survives in a 5 mile radius.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:12 AM
8

Now we all need to be able to respond to email immediately. And to tweet. And to instantly share our photos on Facebook. No, we fucking dont. I dont even have a mobile phone. I can savely say that when I'm not at my computer, you can stuff them cat pictures and whatever else you are sending me somewhere else. When I'm out in town I want to have my damned peace and quiet ffs. not having a Facebook account could be the first sign that you are a mass murderer.” Oh man, I'm a whit male without faceb…
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:02 AM
12

Yeah, youll get "equated" if you want it or not, damnit. Seriously though, its just another of these "equality of result" things. Equality of result isnt equality.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 11:52 PM
3

You know what is meant with patriarchy? Men. Seriously. Go anywhere, say anything to a feminist as a man. The answer will be along the lines of "Check your privilige"... under patriarchy. Patriarchy is a codeword for the male sex, nothing more.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 11:50 PM
3

I translated it from the term in german. A more direct translation would be "insult to one's honor". Basically, if you namecall someone here, they can sue and you have to prove your accusation. A politician had to prove a week or so back that another politican was, in fact, a "clinically certified idiot". He couldnt.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 06:31 PM
2

Strange... Its illegal in my country. Only for women, though. Secondary sexual organs on display. Its legal in some areas like beaches and such though.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 06:28 PM
5

... Its always funny that people are surprised that such protesters get arrested. Because running around nude in public is totally legal.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:10 PM
2

I'd argue that in sex-ed they should show a vid with real sex. We got shown a 1 hour vid of cartoon-sex with tiny, shrunken people walking around in the genitals and telling is how everything works.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:17 PM
23

It remains one of the most disturbing things I've ever seen How corageous not to help. "Oh, a guy getting assaulted-fuck him" Imagine if they are on billboards magazines websites newspapers Wait, corporations are doing advertisement with whats proven to work? Yes, its a lazy, lazy way of doing it, but a half-naked model on an ad sells better than a list of logical reasons to buy a product. but free speech means I can call you a wanker, doesn't it? Actually, no. Thats libel/slander. The last part…
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:07 PM
8

I understand the importance of honoring your ancestors. Though, if you want to do that make an ancestor altar or lay another plate at dinner, instead of chopping up somebodys genitals.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:31 PM
4

Tomorrow on Fox: How the sun is making mass murderers out of everybody, especially brown people
/r/MensRights06/08/12 07:42 PM
13

Hey, he also was white. Why not say his whiteness was responsible for what he did? White people are always so violent.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:54 PM
7

Isn't making a statement about what a "real man" or "real women" does or should do going completely against that? Nah, feminism has had the stance "We are against gender roles, except when we are not" for quite some time. Personally, I would say this: Did you have a penis when you were born? If yes, you are quite possibly a man.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 02:56 AM
1

Yeah, I noticed r/communism. Got banned there because I am "pro-rape" apparently. Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 09:03 PM
0

Mhh, didnt notice that when I post there. Any non-capitalist (communism, anarchism) subreddits that arent feminist?
/r/MensRights05/08/12 08:52 PM
-3

[retracted] for non-capitalists Edit: because feminism
/r/MensRights05/08/12 08:32 PM
4

Wait, that show is about actual cases of murder? Because thats fucked up. If its fictional, I could see how it could be funny, honestly.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 03:59 AM
5

Oh, I read that. Yes, it doesnt make it acceptable if she agitated them. Still, as I said, I think it very possible she just poked them until they had gone berserk to destroy that group. Everybody has a breaking point.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 12:20 PM
14

The women who got it shut down may be a crazy tumblr feminist, but the fact that the admin of the group was sending her rape and murder threats is wrong. That shouldn't happen guys. Has the admin made a statement? Im not going to trust a radfem that she didnt agitate them before they flipped their shit. (yeah, still doesnt make it right, I know. But if she simply poked them with a stick until they got angry, the situation would look very different)
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:49 AM
71

Actually, that looks like some feminist noticed that men are disadvantaged in todays society, and, since patriarchy is responsible for everything bad in the world, it is clearly patriarchy's fault.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 12:36 AM
2

90% of rapes are never reported and only 6.7% of those that are reach conviction on a full charge of rape. Even if these number are correct (they arent, or better said, they may be correct if you count rape like feminists (Look at a women? Rape. Have sex with a women? Rape. Dont notice a women? Preparing for rape.), the police can only prosecute crimes that are reported. You shouldnt exclude reported crimes (false accusations) for theorethical crimes.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:43 PM
2

shouldn't feminism simply be teaching woman not to wrongly accuse Nah, its way better to teach men to no rape /s Basically, if feminists hate 'victim blaming' females who were raped so much, why would they victim blame men who were falsely accused Because if they aknowledge that man can be victims too, it would take away the current standard "the women is the victim" stance of society. For example, if a women kills her husband, he must have deserved it/hit her/she must have been abused in her ch…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:33 PM
10

I find it also pretty funny that she accuses men of being "immature" and "unprepared to assume responsibility". In a society where women dont have to grow up to be moderately successfull. If you are a women, you can scream "sexism" when you are offended and hoards of whiteknights will run to the rescue. You can practically lean back at your job, you are gonna get promoted anyways because it would look "sexist" if you arent.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:26 PM
14

He was intending to kill a dog against the owners wishes No, he wasnt. He was intending to euthanize a dog against the owner's daughter wishes. Your kids have no say in what you do with your pets/your property.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:41 AM
1

Self-made facts are facts too, in 90% of cases.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 10:56 AM
2

Oh, good. So I can stab everyone that offends me? Gotta remember that the next time someone cuts me off.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 10:55 AM
2

Apparently, yes.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 10:54 AM
1

Now start chasing the crazies through the streets. Fun ensues.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 10:54 AM
2

Hoax Doesnt hoax indicate a practical joke? Wouldnt fraud or something be more accurate?
/r/MensRights01/08/12 10:42 AM
7

he chastised ME for not being, and I quote verbatim here, “More thankful someone was watching out for my daughter.” OK, they have to take calls seriously, I get that. But this is ridiculous. He should be thankful for getting the cops called on him? Maybe he should also be thankful if they decide hes dangerous and pepperspray/shoot him?
/r/MensRights01/08/12 10:23 AM
0

If you want a more in-depth discussion, try r/debateacommunist
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:54 PM
0

Which isn't fair. How exaclty is it not fair that everyone is the same? If he is "a parasite to society", why do people elect to give him their money Try to live without it. Try buying a computer without giving money to them. Try buying a car without it. If there was a way, I'd do it. On the other hand, the existence of communists -- like yourself -- is negative sum Ever talked to someone who lived in a communist country? Most of the east germans want it back, a lot of the russians loved it, the…
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:32 PM
2

the billionaire in your example What proof do you have that they're better off with the government programs? What proof do you have that something better wouldn't replace those programs if the government stopped doing them? Please tell me how any of these dont profit from roads, for example. Or the police (well, the state of the police is a whole other discussion, still...), firefighters, or ambulances. Proof that these services wouldnt exist without government? Look into history. No society wit…
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:13 PM
8

Radical Feminism. Freeing women by taking away one freedom at a time.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:00 PM
-2

Both profit strongly from government programs. Since the janitor wouldnt be able to pay what he uses, the billionaire, who has more means, should pay more. Its called Solidarity. (Just a note: I am a communist. I think all people should be equal. So, more taxes for the billionaire would be insufficient in my opinion.)
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:19 PM
6

´where "fair share" is the expenses of the government divided by the number of citizens, or, more fairly, is the expense incurred by the quantity of government services you personally use Both of those ways wouldnt be fair. Say, a janitor would be unable to pay these taxes, while a billionaire wouldnt even notice them. Not saying, the tax brackets are fair, as they stop at some amount, so the rich still dont feel shit.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 04:58 PM
1

While we are at unusual downvoting: Does anybody else suspect he's picked up a downvotebot here? I am getting all my posts downvoted in a timeframe of about 5 minutes daily.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:45 AM
5

emotional infidelity The pure idea of that is actually stupid. Thinking about other women isnt an affair, sticking your dick in one is.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 08:14 PM
9

Change my passwords, firstly. Secondly, get a password for even opening the browser, and some disc encryption, just in case. Then try to talk it out with her (public space, so she cant murder me or anything), tell her that a relationship is founded on trust, and if she doesnt trust me not to bang every girl I come across, I cant be together with her. If she gets reasonable, its good, if not, I get my stuff together as fast as possible and move out (applies only if living together, ofc)
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:37 PM
1

As above, so below. What happens in the little things, is a reflection of the larger things (and, of course, the reverse is also true). If male spaces were accepted, this wouldnt be happening.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:33 PM
2

Of course you are doing the right thing. Why should men not be allowed to have no-female-times while women are having them all the time? And yes, you'll probably drift apart from your friend. That happens.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:31 PM
3

Yes. After a certain age (I think 35 or so), the chances to get a mentally or physically damaged kid increase dramatically.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:22 PM
17

Female tells you your opinion doesnt matter. Its obviously Patriarchy keeping you down.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:16 PM
1

All nice and good (and, I, in fact carry a knife, but I live on the country and use it for other stuff than defending myself). But if the robber guesses/sees that you have a knife, he'd probably just stab you from behind and then rob you.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:13 PM
4

Askreddit
/r/MensRights30/07/12 12:21 PM
6

There was no guilt there, I was excited. I was imagining his reaction in my head. My reaction would be to quit the country as fast as possible and never see that crazy bitch again. Seriously, thats fucked up. Deciding how someones life should go the next 18+ years, against their will.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 12:10 PM
2

I'm not russian. As I said, it wasnt his intention to do mass-murder, but the farmers resisted the move to a industrial society and he couldnt back down from that point on or he'd have lost his authority. The thinking that he was "psychotic" or anything is just capitalist propaganda. Oh, and the reason the russians are still kinda loving him: Full employment, no homelessness, everyones kinda fed.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 01:07 AM
-3

Wasnt his intention. The idea was to rapidly reform the country from an agrarian to an industrial country. To that end, he let farmers be transported to and worked in factory cities that were erected in weeks/months in the tundra with nothing around. I doubt he anticipated that the farmers would resist. (Note: Not a fan of stalin, actually. I just think the man had the right intentions but wasnt able to realize them)
/r/MensRights29/07/12 10:36 PM
86

Now she only needs to go to the police and report that he thrust his penis into her hand.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 08:41 PM
-3

Yes, yes we should. At least to an extent. Not necessarily take illegal action, but maybe produce the infrastructure necessary to do so, should radical anti-men feminism take action first.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 01:29 PM
1

Passed out doesnt count as drunk, for me at least.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:05 AM
0

I'd actually say its not rape even when one party is drunk and the other isnt. The drunk still drank out of their free will. Dont take mind-altering substances if you dont want your mind altered.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:47 AM
2

Even assuming that all the stories were real: Most of them blatantly werent rape. Either the guys stopped or the girls did give consent by action, and didnt say anything about not consenting.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:35 AM
2

This study is absolutely worthless. Half of the points are blindingly obvious (A history of violence makes it more likely that youll be violent in the future? ORLY?) The other half is applicable to half the population (male, videogames)
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:16 AM
6

Actually, it could be literally. You dont know without having seen the contract.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:09 PM
15

Feminism and becoming a grown-ass woman with a strong-ass 30+ year old monster libido has made me decidedly less embarrassed about asking for what I want, particularly as it relates to my intimate life. The funny thing being, if you'd be as blunt as she claims to be as a man, you'd get the cops called on you for harassment. But what I can tell you is this: Getting my courage up to ask a partner that I trust for the sex that I wanted only to be turned down left me feeling hella disempowered. At t…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:03 PM
12

girls were being criminalised inappropriately by the courts when it would have made far more sense to deal with the girl’s issues, in terms of her welfare and behaviour, long before they reached the courtroom. Thats pretty much the story behind all of crime. If all people were equal, there would be next to no crime. But you cant have a big lower class, as is needed in capitalism, and then expect them to not turn to crime. Overall the article is ludicrous. It basically says: We should care for th…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 12:02 PM
-3

I would NEVER go outside at night alone. A comment in that thread. I just find it sad how many people buy into the fear-mongering.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 11:55 AM
16

I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration. [...] 'If I didn't violate her, could I have?' 'Do I have the potential to do to her what they say I did?' Oh, so she wants to have a man that is probably in extreme rage right now (rightfully so) to think about if he could do the violent crime he was falsely accused of. Nothing that could go wrong there (apart from the obvious idiocy that a decade in prison is "good" for somebody)
/r/MensRights27/07/12 12:42 AM
6

Men are more powerful than women Thats off to a good start... If you want to have some private little club for males only [...] you're not a man Yes, you are. You dont want to be with everybody all the time. Do you want to be with your gf/wife 100% of your day, all year long? And if you threaten or abuse women, verbally [...] So, masculinity comes from within, except when you are mean to a woman. Got it. Muggers don't get to have a point of view. Because criminals arent people. Anonymity is a pr…
/r/MensRights26/07/12 10:25 PM
3

You, my friend, probably drank it at the wrong temperature. I had mead at the perfect temperature once (at the mead store) and its incredible how big the difference is.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 10:13 PM
2

Guys, seriously, who is upvoting the damned bot?
/r/MensRights26/07/12 10:07 PM
7

You've just solved the problem. Just exclude males from sports in the name of equality!
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:49 PM
2

For example, keeping the family name under a man. You dont have to. There are double-names or you can use the womans name as well. I also never met anybody that wouldnt marry a women because she doesnt want his name. Ordinary language of day-to-day existence will always include the male gender. “All men are created equal,” mailman, chairman, freshman, he. Thats how the language is. Its not male, its just that the Plural is the same as a singular. And the "mailman, chairman, freshman": Its also W…
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:47 PM
1

I'm not going to drop feminist just because it offends people And you shouldnt. I doubt you will be judged by it, as long as your views are reasonable.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:36 PM
2

MRA is considered a hate driven movement by people with faulty information or hatedriven feminists. Now, hatedriven feminists are, obviously, not all feminists. But feminists that are basically for making men second-class citizens (or just kill them off) because women are extremely superior are definitely hatedriven, and they exist.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:35 PM
6

The scary thing is, that actually sounds like something a judge might say.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:25 PM
2

I would say the poster is BS. Having sex with someone drunk is not rape, since the other party willingly drank the alcohol (of course, if you drugged/spiked the drink of the other party, then its rape).
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:21 PM
22

This. Want equality? Put the teams together. Except then feminists would bitch about how its mysoginistic because women win <50% of the medals.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 01:54 AM
4

By all appearances, these men believed that a man has a responsibility to protect a woman, even to the point of death And thats whats sad about it. Record numbers [of men] aren't marrying I wonder why... Their actions remind us that good triumphs over evil That line honestly was what I hated most about that article. Are there really people that believe morals are as easy as "good vs. evil"
/r/MensRights26/07/12 01:47 AM
10

But its totally mysoginistic to say that a women may not be worth more than a man in every case /s
/r/MensRights25/07/12 11:07 PM
24

There's a predictable cycle of mourning and finger-pointing that follows a massacre like the shootings last week in Aurora, Colorado Well, at least they got that part right.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 06:49 PM
11

Only more reason to make female on male rape illegal, isnt it?
/r/MensRights24/07/12 03:09 PM
22

Where are the cases of sexual violence against men OK, so lets just assume, for one second, that there never was a Female on Male Rape. So, why should it be legal? Is detonating an atomic bomb in a major city legal? Was there ever a case of it?
/r/MensRights24/07/12 11:03 AM
24

Women are inundated with "dont get raped" advice Yeah, maybe, just maybe, because it is more sensible to lock your car than telling people to "dont steal cars".
/r/MensRights24/07/12 01:29 AM
0

Correction: Everyone in Switzerland that was in the military owns a gun. Thats actually very tight gun control, seeing as you have to have trained for a long time to own one.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 06:20 PM
1

BUT I STILL MANAGED TO GET LAID A COUPLE TIMES A YEAR WITHOUT HAVING TO RAPE There we have the problem. Normal people dont use date rape drugs, but there are people that think that they are the greatest catch of all time and want to get laid thrice a night. That are the kind of people that use that stuff.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 06:18 PM
0

Roofies are way easy to get. Look on the Darkweb. In the Hidden Wiki you find like 10 sites that sell it all over the world. As for actually buying them: I dont know. But if someone sells them, someone has to buy them, I guess.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 01:22 PM
3

How is this societies fault that some women are indirect? Because women dont have to grow up to be successful. Why do yout think there are women quotas?
/r/MensRights22/07/12 09:41 PM
34

Well, enjoy your equality.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 09:35 PM
42

if my company isn't worth it to you, I don't want to see you again anyway Just some advice to these women: You know who you pay for their "company"? Escorts and Prostitutes. Yeah.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 09:34 PM
-1

So let's say you could magically obliterate gun crime, and instead if was replace with knife crime. Except that wouldnt happen. You cant kill 12 people with a knife, since you have to get in close. Oh, and killing with a gun is far easier. You are more detached from your victims. Why not? An assault rifle has one purpose, and one purpose only: To make killing more time efficient. So unless you want to defend yourself against the red chinese, you dont need an assault rifle, since a single attacke…
/r/MensRights22/07/12 07:33 PM
-2

He can make connections. Giving Police a chance of catching him, which isnt possible when you can buy Guns at the supermarket. Guns are used more per year to defend than kill in the U.S.. The US has the highest % of gun crime in the first world. The US has the most lax gun laws in the first world. See any connection there maybe? You wouldnt need guns to defend yourself if you had better gun control laws (and are you seriously telling me you need an assault rifle to defend yourself? Or a flame th…
/r/MensRights22/07/12 07:25 PM
2

Look through my post history before making claims. That is what I believe. I dont think single humans matter. I dont think my life matters, I dont think your life matters, I dont think the lifes of my family or friends matter. What matters, is the bottom line. How many survive, and if an action that kills humans advances humanity as a whole in some way.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 07:02 PM
0

So people should just sacrifice themselves like lambs rather than fighting back? No, I say they should fight back as a mob, giving them much more power than when single people try to fight back, enabling strict gun control to make it harder for criminals to obtain them. You make guns illegal, people who are willing to break the law (i.e. kill peopre) are still going to have guns. Except the guy who did it had a clean record, which would make it infinitely harder for him to obtain guns illegaly, …
/r/MensRights22/07/12 07:01 PM
-3

Yeah, I am sure it would have ended much better if all the people in there just started shooting. Nothing bad can happen when a bunch of untrained people in an enclosed space start shooting someone who shoots. Wanna know what would be preferable? If people stopped caring about their life. Had everyone in the theater, instead of trying to survive, thrown themselves on the attacker to bring him down, the victim count would be lower. Individual lives do not matter. The advancement of humanity is th…
/r/MensRights22/07/12 06:19 PM
2

go to /r/debateacommunist if you want to correct your views about socialism.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 01:09 PM
7

Recently, she messaged me and told me to "Cut the opressive bullshit, or else." Save that message. You cant be fired for your political views, even less so when you follow them in your own time. Basically, make as much documentation of your workdays as possible to defend you should you get fired. Then, drag your employer to court and be happy about endless money coming your way. (Note: At least thats what I would do in my country. In your country, there might be some complicating factors (at wil…
/r/MensRights22/07/12 01:00 PM
3

I never did martial arts, but doesnt "sparring" indicate a training fight? Because why would anybody complain about getting hit in a training fight? Oh, and is it standard in the US for martial arts classes to be for all age groups? In my country, they are all divided into different age groups.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 10:12 PM
6

Austrian here. That means fuck all. In the last few years, we had a lot of tiny parties spring up and participate in local elections. We had: The christians (Society will be formed after the bible. You are not christian catholic? Tough luck, we love everybody but you will land in hell and we will make sure that you dont corrupt us pure souls) The "we only concentrate on one of the tiniest counties of the country and expect everybody to vote for us, while we prance around in Lederhosen and hate t…
/r/MensRights21/07/12 01:43 PM
3

The funny thing is, the men that actually rape actually dont want to prevent it.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 01:29 PM
35

I simply cant understand such people. If you are afraid of pedophiles, dont give people that look after your kid hell (because a pedophile totally would bring your kid back after raping it, right? /s), but LOOK AFTER YOUR DAMN KID.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 03:26 PM
2

Assuming this is true (I dont know): They werent wrong. If you have no voice, no method of speaking with the general public and be heard, you have to take it to the streets (freely translated after Ulrike Meinhof). And if no one listens to you on the streets, you have to take it one step further. "Because who fights for the Right is always right[...] Who protects humanity is always right" (Song of the Party, Eastern-Germany, ~ 1950) In short, freedom fighters always deployed Guerilla tactics (wh…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 12:50 PM
7

I actually thought about making a podcast, on which I just say what feminists have said that week, but with the genders reversed and acted as if it were my opinion. And then, should I stir up a shitstorm, I just point to the original.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 12:37 PM
29

Men arent as sensitive as women Well, I suppose she would also agree to "Women are too emotional for leadership positions", right?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:51 AM
7

This. I dont understand how gender is needed in any law (apart from pregnancy leave and such obvious stuff)
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:43 AM
4

Yep, kilts are awesome. I also wear a kaftan in the summer (only at home, anti-muslim (and anything that has to do with them) sentiment is sadly fairly strong where I live).
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:34 PM
6

Pff, romans? They only conquered HALF the world. Now think what they could have done with pants?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:32 PM
15

I have watched intelligent, motivated and capable young women shy away from leadership positions Yeah, thats not because of any "bias" thats because leadership is hard and you are responsible if things go belly-up. Not many people are willing to accept that kind of responsibility (that those that are frequently suffer from narcissm/sociopathy and whatnot is an entirely different story) 42% of first to third-grade girls want to be thinner It could not possibly be because 35% of US adults (couldnt…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:26 PM
11

Great response. as for "confused: I was dozing and still drunk and, yes, I took my panties off myself. But when I realized that it was not OK for him to make advances on me in my state, I pushed him away and ran out. He later felt so bad he wanted turn himself in for rape. So... He made advances, you began undressing, decided you didnt want to have sex, pushed him off, he stopped. And you think that was rape? Or even close to it? So, every time I ask a women if she wants to have sex and she says…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:12 PM
1

I dont have anything against it, as long as its labeled correctly. Too often the "traps" appear in yuri/straight/whatever collections. As for "extremely annoying and hate criticism": Well, then they shouldnt be on a public platform. Make your art available and it will be criticised. As for "lesbian stuff": I like it, sometimes. Straight male here, btw.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:15 PM
9

Catcalls, hooting laughter and orders to ‘Take it off!’ were refreshingly shameless and surprisingly frequent And if men were doing it, she would be afraid and run away because the evil menz surely were going to rape her. Oh, and I am for objectification. Let women and men be objectified equally. There are women who like to be objectified, there are men who like it. Why not let them have it?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:11 PM
3

Men should be able to do what they want. Women should be able to do what they want. Whats the problem there? Why does any field NEED at least 50% women in it? If women dont want to go into STEM they shouldnt have to. Btw: What I dont get: How can feminists cry rape when you ask twice for sex, but find campaigns essentially pressuring them into STEM totally OK?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:08 PM
2

Lets adress this one by one: Life expectancy Oh, how horrible, women life longer. Maybe euthanasia could fix that /s Time off work Dont take time of work. "Problem" fixed. Higher Insurance Cost omen pay 30% more, also use a lot more healthcare than men. How horrible, corporations basing their insurance policies after how much they'll have to shell out. Lower pay BS. Women in the same job get the same money (in countries with conscription even more because of seniority) Pricier long term care cov…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:45 PM
3

That... actually sounds awesome. Always wanted my brain to be in a cyborg someday.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:33 PM
3

He allows them [police] to [get into the house], but they were pushy and aggressive about it Here's the first mistake: Dont ever let police into your house without them having shown you proper documents that they are allowed to (and no, police cant come into your house just because they feel like it). Dont ever let them search you/your house or let them bring you anywhere without them having shown you proper documents that they are allowed to do so. Know your rights, and know them better than th…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:29 PM
39

Actually, men accused of rape and abuse are often vigorously defended. As they should be. An accusation doesnt make a deed. The conversation should be about the behavior, not the person. Only, what is "the person"? The conglomeration of their deeds/behavior. We benefit from male privilege every moment of every day I am sure all the men that are homeless/jobless/fucked over by divorce/child support agree. I also love the male privilege to have nearly a monopoly on deaths in wars. Let’s listen whe…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:06 AM
10

Here's the thing: "sexuality" is not about objectifying women. Actual sexuality is being sexual. Oh, yeah, I really misinterpreted that Bikini. That they wore in a convention. And not a bathsuit one. Yeah, wait, I am fairly sure wearing the skimpiest outfit possible without having your genitals exposed counts as being "sexual". Preeeeeeeetty sure. Drooling over cosplay women, calling them "girls," and suggesting that their fandom and cosplaying are just there to get you off? Oh, wait, can we kno…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 05:00 PM
1

but is still under review as there were complaints of harrasment from this group Have some quotes from the blog: only 3 asks, all from the same dude asking ~why u gotta hate ppl~ if i didn’t know any better i’d say neckbeards lose all their courageous will to wish rape on women when they can’t do it anonymously To a pic of the "stop false rape accusations" poster: lmfao you guys “stop holding me accountable for what i do to you while you’re drunk” rape apologism mra bullshit stupid men dumb tw r…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 12:32 PM
35

I always found it funny how feminists complain that calling them "slut, bitch" etc. is sexist and then call men "dick, wimp" etc. in the same sentence. BTW, for doctor I actually imagined a woman, since most doctors I was at were women (I didnt really have anything serious, so it was just general medicine)
/r/MensRights18/07/12 12:18 PM
1

Women with this belief can be placed firmly in the category of fanatic radical feminists. Usually they not only want women to rule the world but also to reduce the male population to a minimum or even remove it entirely or establish a kind of fanatical matriarchy. We call them the man haters, the misandrists I prefer Neo-Amazons. Sounds cooler and would make a nice enemy in a science fiction story.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 12:00 AM
3

I learned reading through comics. Well, for them anyways. Today I read all the time. The problem, I think, is simply that teachers dont really care what kids want to read and assign some 200 year old book with a political theme (oh, yeah, that will get 10 year olds to love books, wont it?) that they have no chance of understanding. I had the luck that my elementary teacher (a women) actually cared. We read the old stuff, too. But the good stuff. We read the Snorri-Edda, for example. Teaches hist…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 11:53 PM
2

This. Forcing kids to read is not the answer. They'll remember that and as soon as they decide themselves theyll never touch a book ever again.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 11:49 PM
6

Yeah. Who would've thought that when you can bring people into jail for years just by inventing a story people would do it? I mean, its not like we had thousands of years where exactly that was the case to predict something like that, oh no.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 11:43 PM
3

Yeah, that law makes no fucking sense: "Women have a right to do with their body what they want, except when we dont want them to"
/r/MensRights17/07/12 12:31 PM
3

There are stories of young Thai women being sold by their families to Swedish men Actually, thats not selling. Its an old tradition, Europe had it too. You pay the family of a bride because she looses a worker when the bride goes to live with her husband.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 02:17 AM
5

And this is why false rape accusers need to be at least as harshly punished as rapists.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 02:14 AM
3

I HAD YOUR KID! Pay up mother fucker, this is a LIFETIME responsibility! I actually would agree. Except, you know, the woman has the lone say in abortion. Dont want a kid? FUCKING ABORT IT OR TAKE THE PILL OR MAKE HIM USE A CONDOM. Dont get a kid and then claim the father forced you into a lifetime responsibility. Because that just shows you are not ready to accept any responsibility whatsoever for your actions. Anybody who does that should have their adult-status taken away, as they clearly are…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 02:09 AM
3

This. Others are not responsible for your feelings. This is the internet. It is practically endless. Dont like the people somewhere? Go somewhere different instead of bitching about how mean everybody is. I once saw a militant non-smoker walk into a smoker-bar with a big sign claiming so in the front and start bitching about how everybody should stop smoking so he can drink there. That was the day I stopped caring about PC.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:55 AM
4

A comedian who shoots down an audience member who objects to his rape jokes by joking about her being gang-raped on the spot isn't being funny. Translation: A comedian who shoots down an audience member that disturbs his act by directing a joke at said audience member is in the wrong. Instead he should probably have given her the microphone so she is able to tell the room how men just should stop raping all the time. He's using rape to shut up a woman who crossed a boundary by speaking out of tu…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 11:15 PM
1

So, lets compare: Holocaust: Burning people in furnaces, gassing them to death, 6 Million dead Today: Not allowed to cut part of a babies penis off. Still legal for adults (as far as I know) Yeah, I can see that comparison. Sounds reasonable.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 12:22 PM
4

1.: You dont know how you would like it to be uncircumcised. 2.: Maybe you are, a lot of people are not, and there are complications regularly. 3.: It has no use. Circumcision simply is useless in the modern world. Its only cosmetic surgery. Would you give an infant breast implants?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 12:19 PM
3

No, but it opened my eyes. See, its perfectly acceptable in society to do this for women. Now, try it as a men once.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 10:34 PM
5

I saw this woman on the side of the road who had a flat tire and was clearly having issues changing it. A quote from the original post. As I read it, he saw her trying to change it, and failing.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 08:22 PM
2

Honestly, people like these is why the world is a shitty place filled with egoists. If everyone would go around helping each other, everybody would be that much happier. This is why. A good world begins with you.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 08:19 PM
1

I was saying different people have different abilities.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 08:19 PM
-2

Uhhhm, so everybody should know everything? I can fix pretty much any computer problem you throw at me, yet have no clue how to do anything with a car. Does that mean I'm doing something wrong?
/r/MensRights15/07/12 06:25 PM
19

I find it partularly sad how many upvotes the "justifications" get. So, because some men are rapists you should call 911 on your phone when somebody is kind enough to stop and help you? Honestly, people like these is why the world is a shitty place filled with egoists. If everyone would go around helping each other, everybody would be that much happier. If this would have happened to me, I'd thrown a shitfit, probably ending with "You know what? Fuck this. Fuck helping others. Because of you, I …
/r/MensRights15/07/12 02:52 PM
1

Sure, sure and Pinochet was a puppet of the USSR to make the US look bad.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 02:42 PM
8

19 here. I became MRM when I realized in Highschool that a girl was leading me on to receive computer/programming/english/history help. That led to me being fairly bitter about women (that was before I came to reddit), thinking them all gold diggers and selfish bitches. Came to reddit, read a while on this sub, which slowly changed my opinion. TL;DR: Thanks /r/Mensrights for un-making me a hateful bastard.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 02:38 PM
1

Hate speech is inciting hate towards a group of people, not making threats (at least in my country). For example: "God hates Fags" would probably be on the edge, as it isnt saying "and you should too", but if you get the right judge it could be ruled illegal.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 02:32 PM
1

The water still has to be either processed or pumped back into the sea. Both options pollute.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 05:30 AM
7

A.: Urinals save water compared to toilets. B.: Nope, it isnt. I am >1.9m, to pee without sitting down in a normal toilet I basically have to squat. And btw, the line that Urinals clog easier is a blatant lie. My family owns a restaurant, I've never seen a clogged Urinal once in the last 10 years, while toilets clog weekly. Urinals dont clog unless some fucktard shits in them or stuffs them with toilet paper.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:53 PM
17

Thats really funny. Try to be a traditional male and you'll be seen as a mysoginistic macho asshole. Behave normally and be seen as a wimp. Nice one.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:51 PM
3

Yes, yes it is. The solution to the "getting kicked out" problem would be to either sit down with your parents and telling them that you are an adult and can stay out as long as you want or, and I know this sounds insane, to get back in time and care for your kids.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 12:25 PM
1

TL;DR of the article: Female researchers think their male colleagues are biased against them. Its all the male's fault. Seriously, how does one even consider this "logic"?
/r/MensRights14/07/12 02:24 AM
7

Don't forget to bring a "I, NAME1 am consenting to sex with NAME2, in full possession of my mental capabilites" form with you and make her sign it.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:20 AM
10

FFS, even in the middle ages jesters could say what they wanted. But not today? Says a lot about society.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 11:57 PM
16

So you dont go to a bar to drink or to a club to dance? You know, not everyone that wants to have fun wants to have sex.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 11:36 PM
6

I am far more educated than you, so do not try to educate me As we all know, an academic title makes you an expert on everything. Also, I love the "you sound like an immature child" part.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:51 PM
1

Ignoring that the whole stranger danger/pedophile craze is created by governments to let people glance over important issues (someone crashed the economy 2 weeks before elections? Fuck, better find some cute little white girl that was kidnapped and raped and only talk about that on all the news), the questioning victims part is BS. Investigating crimes is vital for justice. How the fuck would that work without questioning the victim? You cant just take someones word and send somebody to jail for…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:24 AM
2

And there you get into the complicated territory of whats okay through free speech and what isnt. Personally, I feel all these rape/beatings/whatev subreddits are either only trolls, in which case we should avoid feeding them or are used as porn subreddits (saw lots of entries on that on /r/beatingwomen and r/rapingwomen). In that case, im fine with that. If you have a fetish, no matter which, you should be allowed to live it out (with the violent/children/teen stuff of course only in RP or thro…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:18 AM
3

I'd really be interested in why she did it. Any reports on that? Also: I dont know about the area where you live in, but doesnt it sound racist that all the "criminals" she described were latino/black?
/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:08 AM
2

In my country, the parents get charged, usually fined.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:05 AM
4

Mother of four Oh, those kids sure will turn out great. Hopefully she loses custody.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:01 AM
1

Because rape jokes usually happen more often than rapes.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 02:56 PM
2

Yeah, but that was because she was saying stuff that the powers that be didnt like.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 11:29 AM
0

Yeah, and every threat you make is utterly sincere, isnt it?
/r/MensRights10/07/12 11:26 AM
4

he's wrong for joking about rape. Sorry, but no. Defining that any humor whatsoever is "wrong" is very dangerous indeed. Think about how many comedians are making clever political observations and whatnot. If you start to make topics taboo, you are doing it wrong.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 11:24 AM
11

This. If she had assaulted me, she would have more than an injured hand. You cant just assault people on the street because they say something you dont like. Oh, and how utterly stupid do you have to be to believe this: Fucking cunt, I'd take her into the back alley >and show her what I'm made of. She won't even see it coming Is a serious threat? I'm guessing she now is preparing her house for a mass-assault of 1000s of rapists because of the threats she received.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 11:21 AM
2

You dont quite seem to get democracy there, bro.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 04:11 PM
2

Wait, did they seriously propose a secondary toilet for stand up peeers? Do they want them to sit in the back of the bus too?
/r/MensRights09/07/12 04:10 PM
3

Coming next summer to "statistics" near you: Every penetration is rape Oh, and, seriously? 1 in 2? That would mean that either the grandma or the ma got raped. And, like 2 others there. How would anyone even go about believing that? By not knowing more than 1 woman?
/r/MensRights09/07/12 04:08 PM
7

I live there^
/r/MensRights09/07/12 12:30 AM
15

Thats fucking laughable. No one said anything against circumcision as long as it is done on consenting adults. If circumcision is vitaly important for a religious group, their believers can just get it on their 18th birthday.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 08:51 PM
9

Well, looks like I wont accept treatment from female doctors in the future.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 08:49 PM
2

“If it had been a man seducing a 15 year old girl, the comments certainly wouldn’t say she was lucky. Why is it so when then genders are reversed?” “Because girls are girls, and boys are boys. You can’t be this dumb.” Some people...
/r/MensRights08/07/12 01:55 PM
4

Honestly, if I were in your situation, I would probably steal it back. On the other hand, its impossible for cars to change hands like that in my country, so I never will. And @anybody else here who keeps his title in the glovebox: Dont. Thats not where it belongs. If a cop wants to see the papers, a copy is enough. The original should either be in a safety deposit boxx, or, you can get a decent, fireproof safe that is big enough for all your vital documents for <100$.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 01:27 AM
2

No, they arent. No one has the rights to mutilate somebody else. And no one is agains circumcision, as long as an adult makes the decision on his own. Dont make such choices for your child.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 01:24 AM
3

Behavior analysis during trial, maybe a talk with a psychiatrist.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 04:17 PM
1

The attacker didnt want to rape him, since he is straight. The "couldnt complete the act"-stuff comes from the fact that the attacker intended to rape a women and attacked a man instead. Therefore, he couldnt complete the planned act as he didnt have a female victim.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 03:36 PM
4

Here's the thing: The evolutionary use of sex is reproduction. The male orgasm is needed for that. The female one however, isnt. Of course its more likely that a male orgasms, its needed to secure a future for the species.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 03:31 AM
1

Nope, there isnt, seeing as "Men's rights" isnt an organization, but an idea.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 10:37 AM
8

For example, you’re a woman, and your husband loses his cool and calls you the B-word Seriously? SERIOUSLY? "Oh, yeah, she called me asshole, so I hit my girlfriend". How does that sound? OK? If you hit someone because he calls you names (and not exactly the worst ones, either) then you should go back to school, since you clearly arent mature enough to call yourself an adult. Note: I know, the article later mentioned to shed the sexist views about violence. Still, the above quote is fucked up.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 12:07 AM
11

Cool down, guys. The attacker has been found guilty for assault, just not rape. Why not rape? Because rape hasnt occured. Tearing off somebody clothing isnt rape and in many countries a planned crime isnt a crime. Granted, the attacker would most likely have gone through with it if the victim would have been female. Still, it didnt actually occur. As for the judge calling the victim "he": Well, the victim still had man-parts or the attacker wouldnt have noticed that he is male. Therefore, he is …
/r/MensRights06/07/12 12:02 AM
1

We arent defending the specific subreddits, only free speech. Seeing as (as far as I've seen) r/raping/beating women/cripples whatever are only about pictures. Now, pictures of that stuff arent illegal in the US, were the servers are located. Therefore, the subreddits dont violate laws.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:04 PM
1

Nah, its not spamming discussions, its one single line entry. And, as a bonus, we actually see what it copies and what not so we notice when it bugs out.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:54 AM
24

These subreddits never should be removed. No subreddit (that doesnt violate local laws) should. Why? Well, if the Reddit Overlords decide that it is right to delete a subreddit on basis of it essentially "disturbing" some people, no subreddit would ever be safe. Religious subreddits would have to be deleted for atheists, atheistic ones for theists. fanart subreddits would have to be deleted for people wanting to not get their universes ruined, movie/literature/games subreddits for people not wan…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:52 AM
11

No. It would set a disturbing precedent and no one would be save from deletion. So far, to my knowledge, only subreddits that violate laws have been removed (pedophile ones and whatnot), and thats how it should be.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:47 AM
8

Oh, yeah, I got called that more than once for pointing out that when calling a woman "cunt" is sexist, then calling a man "dick" is too.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:43 AM
7

You do know that one of the very basics of Marx' idea was that workers need to educate themselves, right? You know, like it means the exact opposite of what you think it means. Go to http://www.reddit.com/r/debateacommunist if you want to educate yourself. (I'd write up a better answer, but its 4:45am here)
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:37 AM
3

In case you still like cops, look at a local Antifa-protest sometimes. Its really funny how cops treat left-wing protesters. And by funny I mean reprehensible.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:33 AM
12

Sure. I'll just go grab me gun in case we see any flying pigs while we wait.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:31 AM
3

The funny thing is, if they really do believe that religious freedom gives you the right to mutilate others, than they also have to believe that 9/11 was absolutely legal. I mean, hey, they were just on a holy war against infidels, cant prosecute them for their believes.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 12:14 PM
3

That actually makes sense. Only about 20% of IT-graduates are women. These are highly sought after by companies wanting to "diversify" (no matter the actualy qualifications). So, he can use the male graduates for less, since they arent as wanted.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 12:09 PM
12

How many male writers does your beloved jezebel have? Nonono, you are getting it all wrong, its only sexist when its against women, silly.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 12:07 PM
9

And this is why woman-rates are BS.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 11:55 AM
12

Just scream the name of your ex. It works on both sexes and doesnt require prior knowledge that it is, in fact, a safeword.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 12:31 AM
5

He called some agency "paper tiger". "Paper tigers" is what Mao called Capitalists.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 10:46 PM
17

Thats laughable. She has a home worth 600000$(with the mortgage substracted). She even signed a contract saying he only has to pay child support and nothing to her. She gets out of it because "she was rushed and didnt read it". The fuck? If you sign a contract and you didnt read it then its your fault. You are an adult. Dont fucking sign something without reading it. Also, anyone else catch the fact that the guy read Mao Zedong? I really started liking him more after I did.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 10:14 PM
28

Yeah, same happened to me. I was just walking down the street when I saw some girl walk in front of me with really tight jeans. I was just unpacking my penis when I saw such a poster on the wall. Real life savers, dat.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 10:04 PM
0

That actually made me think. I came to this conclusion: I dont notice different races as "different". Neither do I notice different religions as "different" (well, except when they try to shove it down my throat, that is). But I notice a difference between genders. Mhh. Need to think about that some more.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 06:16 PM
3

Its not "denying acess". They are looking for roomates. Its not like they want to make males sit in the back of the bus. Why should you not be entitled to choose who you want to be roomate with?
/r/MensRights03/07/12 04:45 PM
2

... How is that a stereotype? Are you trying to tell me that you do everything around women you do around men? And feel comfortable while doing it?
/r/MensRights03/07/12 12:54 PM
-3

I think that saying "women only" would be OK. Why? A woman might be more comfortable with a female flatmate, enabling her to run around naked and whatnot. Same for men, obviously. Now, as for race or religion, I would so no. That doesnt matter and is just discrimination (though that "diet" thing could be legitimate, he could jsut write "vegitarians only".
/r/MensRights03/07/12 10:26 AM
7

Well, there also was the idiot that did live-posting him taking a hostage and getting surrounded by police (with location updates).
/r/MensRights03/07/12 12:21 AM
2

I won't lie, I like fighting. Love it. It makes one feel alive. However, as I said, I never start fights. I never even call people names or provoke them in other ways. But if someone attacks me, I dont back down. The weakpoints are meant as a PSA. People usually know the weakpoints of guys (they are practically advertised in Biology class), but not the weakoints of women. Now, I dont advise actually hitting them (unless they start going for your balls).
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:37 PM
6

To sum this article up: Apparently, women can choose between wimps, knuckleheads, and a guy who is great in bed. I wonder as which one the author identifies himself?
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:21 PM
2

He figures it's much easier to just say this than to try to explain the real reason he's running late Yeah, I have already worked out that that usually doesnt work. Instead, depending on your reason, just explain it in minute detail. After I once spent 2 hours explaining (programming context) what an engine is, what it does, why its important to choose the right one and the differences between how blitting works in different engines, I never got asked anything that couldnt be answered by "Work".…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:16 PM
9

"But, but I thought I hit Manbearpig"
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:08 PM
12

Its really funny how ones says, totally outraged "Oh, you wanna hit a girl, huh?", after hitting him and him actually pushing back. Yeah, no shit, what did she expect? "Oh please mistress dont hurt this poor, poor man" or what? Honestly, I've dropped the whole "not hitting girls" thing a long time ago. I am >1.9m, do some muscle training (not much) and am capable of taking most people in a fight. I dont start them. If someone is stupid enough to think he/she needs to start a fight with me, I fig…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:06 PM
6

Look at how elections turn out, look at people doing stupid shit everyday. Become a Misanthrope. Misanthropy is fairly respected by society, especially when you are in academia. Then in turn, learn to appreciate good people. There are lots (well, some) intelligent people with a good outlook on life. Learn to love them, it makes the absolute crappyness of the rest of humanity more bearable. Its what I did. Admittedly, I live a more or less hermitic lifestyle, but I am enjoying it.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 12:26 PM
1

Notice how I said it should be gender neutral.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 12:22 AM
2

True, but dropping one part of a reltionship into homelessness and no income is a bit harsh. As I said, if theres only 1 provider in a relationship, that provider should be required to pay a minimum (aka very tiny room&minimum wage) survival fee to the other part for, say, 1-3 months.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 11:20 PM
6

So, say, stealing bread to not starve is no justification?
/r/MensRights01/07/12 11:18 PM
8

He means he didnt have to dine&wine them first.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 11:17 PM
-1

Early Middle Ages (Dark Ages). It's been a while.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 09:34 PM
27

Women watch men strip for fun. Men watch women for darker reasons For women, it has nothing to do with sex. For men, it is about power When we watch others shed their clothes, what do we reveal about ourselves? The Chippendales are in Britain this month to kick off a 20-city European tour, and the girls at the Spearmint Rhino lap-dancing club are always available. This week, I have been to both to wonder what – if anything – is exposed alongside the flesh? In Edinburgh, the Chippendale audience …
/r/MensRights01/07/12 09:31 PM
18

The Spearmint Rhino Club in London, by contrast, is subterranean and windowless A. Not all strip clubs are like this. B. It couldnt possinly be because its cheaper and is less likely to attract "decency" protesters. To earn the money, they have to beg Its a customer oriented job. It isnt begging, they ask if the customer wants a job performed. Oh, and it is phrased as if they had to beg to get their money after they did their job. That isnt the case. Strip clubs (usually) have big, scary bouncer…
/r/MensRights01/07/12 09:29 PM
2

Because criminals aren't people. Usually, they have reasons, good reasons, why they do what they do. No one risks prison without them, except mentally ill people.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 09:13 PM
7

Thats laughable. Why does he have to provide for her HORSE? I can understand, to a point, giving her money (and 10000 is already much at that. Something slightly above minimum wage would make more sense, to not promote this course of action for a carefree lifestyle) but having to pay for her pets is ludicrous. If you cant afford pets on your own, sell them or give them to friends. Tough shit. Its life.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 09:03 PM
1

Maybe its culture-specific. I'm from Austria. Its a pretty common expression here.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 01:44 PM
4

This. If they want the same pay, they should have the same skills.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 11:47 AM
4

Overlooking for a moment the "slightly" unrealistic scenario (I've never seen something like that on a webcomic comment. Well, okay, once. The comic was about the artist's lesbian lifestyle.), isn't that actually not that uncommon? Never had a moment where you were like "Dude, if you were a women I'd marry you"?
/r/MensRights01/07/12 11:42 AM
5

That he got fired for that is idiotic. It's valid criticism, Felicia Day does nothing special, yet she is very popular (I like her personally, btw). Though, I think she is actually a genuine gamer girl. If you look around Youtube, you find a lot of "gamer girls" that aren't and are just trying to exploit their boobs for money.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 11:31 AM
0

shrug Its a business. Traditional, physical books have a very, very small profit margin. These genres make next to guaranteed money, as the authors are shit and can easily be paid less for their work, leading them to rush out more books to be able to live from them (and in the hope of landing a movie sometimes to get rich). That, in turn, gives the publisher the funds to help bring out less-secure/loss-incuring new authors that are actually good. An author for this type of books actually lives i…
/r/MensRights30/06/12 06:45 PM
16

Isn't there a middle ground that doesn't necessitate enduring harassment or social castration? Yes. Both genders can ask whoever they want. If the other part says no, its no. If yes, sexy time ensues. Apparently I'm not able to grasp the problem there.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 06:38 PM
34

So much this. Either a drunk person is responsible for its actions or not. And if not, then DUIs shouldnt exist either.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 06:32 PM
3

The guy is clearly in the right. He wanted to authenticate their money, they assaulted him for it and, as he retreated, followed him behind the counter. You can hardly fight off 2 attackers alone, so he used a "weapon".
/r/MensRights30/06/12 11:52 AM
-3

Lack of women as primary characters within media not geared toward the middle-aged housewife/teenage girl demographic You covered basically all profitable female demographics there. Of course they aren't primary characters as much in media geared towards men. Its easier to emphasize with someone of your gender (Note: Because of similiar experiences, not reproductive organs).
/r/MensRights30/06/12 11:37 AM
4

The reality is, society is evolving You are right there. Historically, you can see that society always was swinging between male-controlled and female-controlled (not using patriarchy/matriarchy here for the reason that it didnt necessarily come with a sexist law-system). From the female-controlled tribes of the stone-age to the men-controlled tribes of the bronze/iron-age with a more female-control coming through in the Renaissance again (that being, less direct, but heavy influence on kings) t…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:14 PM
2

No, it wont, but they can make sexual assault claims after that and bring the men in prison.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:54 PM
10

Well, then I guess it is OK to lock women in the kitchen and treat them as sex objects. Dont these women have men in their families that they care about?
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:51 PM
1

Thatcher's reforms of the financial sector created the bubble, which, when it eventually burst, created the crysis.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:16 PM
8

... Hey, they werent exactly nice either
/r/MensRights29/06/12 11:55 AM
1

Calling either Thatcher or Merkel smart is a bit of a stretch, seeing as one orchestrated the whole economic crysis we have atm, and the other one just keeps making it worse.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 11:52 AM
6

Well, if you use the feminist definition of rape, then its probably right. Just like 1/4 of female college students get raped when you use that. Problem is, its just plain wrong.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 11:13 AM
4

I wonder what would happen if I, as a man, were to read what is essentially slavery-erotica on a train or somewhere else public... I think outrage wouldnt even be sufficient to describe it. But since the demographic that normally critizes porn (aka. Middle-aged women with unfullfilling relationships (no good relationship has to fear porn) does it its OK? Btw: If I ever write a novel, its probably gonna be like 50 shades of grey from the male perspective. I shall get rich from all the copies boug…
/r/MensRights28/06/12 11:21 PM
2

We really shouldnt desire success through the loss of credibility.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 11:03 PM
1

Very well. Its the truth. Compare to "Dont leave your door unlocked when you go on vacation" or "Dont wear your Rollex while walking through a Refugee Camp"
/r/MensRights28/06/12 11:02 PM
4

In light of this, I may be persuaded to change my stance on female circumcision.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 12:33 PM
7

You hack off part of ones genitals and you hack off part of ones genitals. Totally not comparable. At all.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 12:33 PM
5

I always took it as a warning, meaning: "If you see signs of creepyness/obsession run like hell". And "Dont stick your dick in crazy" is just catchier than "Do not interact with possible abusers". Warnings have to be catchy so you remember them when you need them. Its unlikely you are going on a date when you are already alarmed and looking for signs.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 12:03 PM
0

feminists are not seen as lesbians in my point of view, just as an oxymoron Yeah, but if they have a bf, he's a moron. Who wants to stay with someone who sees you as a rapist barely kept in check by society? Great post btw.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 11:07 PM
4

I wouldnt. Repercussions are needed and apparently, the legal system isnt ready to give them jail time. It would seem kinda right to me if they got to experience what it really feels like.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 11:03 PM
1

Agreed. We will never get rid of pedophiles, no matter how many are put into prison. Legalizing CP-possession, but not production, makes sense because it would be a means of keeping them occupied. A fapping pedo isnt out to kidnap a kid. But with CP illegal, it is easy for pedophiles to try to ignore their urges (which doesnt work forever), and they usually dont go to a psychiatrist for fear of judgement/prison. And with pressure building up, sooner or later that pedophile is gonna do something …
/r/MensRights27/06/12 11:46 AM
7

It seems kind of like you like it. That it has seemingly intrigued and began taking over your desires Some people are just... Wow. Really, I want to see anyone say that to a female rape victim "Yeah, it seems you liked it" and see what happens.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 11:40 AM
13

Yeah, sure, and banning female genital mutilation is anti-muslim /s Honestly, there should be laws so you cant join a religion until you are 18 (and can look at them for yourself). And that comes from a religious person (not abrahamic).
/r/MensRights27/06/12 11:29 AM
11

Jim Sterling takes on rape in Videogames. Of, course, lots of BS in in the video. 4:45-5:20: "There are plenty of tips that tell women how to avoid rape, but there are few that tell men to not rape" 2:55: "... Rape on the other hand, is one sided, something that women cant just physically do" 3:11: "Most men wont have to worry about being raped in their lives, most women would be right to worry about it, because it happens to women a lot"
/r/MensRights26/06/12 11:53 AM
6

While I have nothing against the service, if my gf would use it on me, I would run away. A relationship cant work without trust, and you cant gain that by making the other side paranoid.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 01:55 AM
1

The laws from 1800-1900 are sexist, but they usually were modified to fit both after about 20 years. Of course, harsher laws for men could've been justified in that period, seeing as women were kept in the household and had therefore no experience in the real world (Note that that only applies to upper class women, as the lower and a large part of the middle class had to work just as men)
/r/MensRights25/06/12 06:09 PM
1

Or find a clique and kick everyone's ass when they try to bully you. I was in the programmer-group in Highschool. Never got bullied, because I was in the IT class and everybody dealt at least sometimes with computers and needed someone to fix all the shit they did or someone to copy the programming homework from (Well, I actually never bothered with the latter. Always finished it next lesson) Though, if we had a bigger population of punks, I'd have been there. Waaay to much Nazis in my school.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 06:05 PM
4

"Should" being the keyword. you "should" also be able to let your door be unlocked while you sleep or to loose your purse in the supermarket and still find it after you noticed 3 hours later. We dont live in a perfect world. You have to take some measures against criminals, to minimize the risk of being a victim. That depends, of course, upon the person. Some choose not to do it, I go as far as to wear a combat knife when Im out of the house (that also doubles as a survival knife should I ever g…
/r/MensRights25/06/12 06:02 PM
8

I dont know about the UK, in my country, if a girl was complaining about bullying in Highschool, the teachers got mad. Really mad. Like, punish half the class mad, because they didnt help. If a boy was bullied it was a half-hearted "Dont do that anymore, M'kay?"
/r/MensRights25/06/12 05:58 PM
2

Pff, remembers me of a story in highschool: We were skiing, I was slightly sick, so I stayed back, since they couldnt afford to let a teacher behind and knew we were responsible enough to not get us killed, they just told the hotel staff to not let us out and went. Later, there was a knock on my room-door. I opened it. Apparently, a girl was also slightly sick and stayed behind. Now she was standing in a (fairly tiny) bikini at my door. Told me she wanted sex. I had never seen her before, but he…
/r/MensRights25/06/12 11:39 AM
4

Why the fuck would it be the problem of anyone but me/my family what I spend my money on? If my family lives a comfortable live and I decide to spend my money on whiskey and hookers, whats the problem with that?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 11:31 AM
1

Because it makes men gay with all that awesome shower-surprise sex /s
/r/MensRights25/06/12 11:26 AM
7

How can anyone be stupid enough to fake injuries while in front of a police officer?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 11:24 AM
6

Yeah, always those damned male teenage mothers. Its an epidemic.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:30 PM
4

Don't forget that some countries/corporations have women-rates, which means women, even without education, have a higher chance of getting a job.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:29 PM
3

That is exactly the problem. Would you be OK with any other crime being like this? Someone just saying "Yeah, he is guilty" and you being arrested, bailless? I'm gonna go with no. And neither should be rape. It is better to let a few rapists go free than lock up so many innocents.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 11:35 AM
1

Lie Yeah, I think saying you "will" get caught is a bit harsh. Not saying you should do it, though. Talk about other girls Insecure much? If she is mad you obviously did something Oh yeah sure, because people never are illogical, especially women(PMS) Tell her shes overreacting Look above. Overuse sarcasm Oh yeah, that will go over well /s
/r/MensRights24/06/12 11:28 AM
7

And they shouldn't be either. 2 wrongs dont make a right and whatnot.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 11:16 AM
7

Depends. Enemy or Friendly? Enemy=Its to be expected when you let yourself get captured. Friendly=Nope.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 01:09 AM
15

I think it really helps. Whenever I get harassed, I just reimind myself that I could kill them, but I'm just too nice. The fucking fuck? If I'd say that, I'd get locked up at the psychiatric clinic.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 12:32 AM
15

Answer from me to a similiar thread: And of course women should do things to protect themselves from rape. You dont want to get robbed? Better not stack your money on the street then. Dont want to get killed? Dont go wandering around a warzone. Not saying rape is right or something, but it is logical that when you dont want something to happen, you try to not get yourself in situations where it easily can happen.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 12:30 AM
8

There's a difference. Saying its the victims fault is a bit harsh. But saying that the victim could have done something to avoid it, is true. Is it only the robbers fault when he steals your sports-car and you left the key in? Every single insurance will tell you no.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 12:29 AM
3

Its funny how he complains that people are "assuming that women are always the victims of domestic violence" and then assumes that men are always the rapists. And of course women should do things to protect themselves from rape. You dont want to get robbed? Better not stack your money on the street then. Dont want to get killed? Dont go wandering around a warzone. Not saying rape is right or something, but it is logical that when you dont want something to happen, you try to not get yourself in …
/r/MensRights23/06/12 12:32 PM
1

She really shouldnt be prosecuted. He is of legal age, and she didnt even have power over him (as a cheerleading coach, an assistant to boot). Besides, I think that whole "power over..." thing is BS anyways. Being of legal age should reflect being ready to be a parent, something which is a giant decision that will majorly influence 1/3 of your life. Surely, someone who can make that kind of decision can decide if he wants to sleep with a teacher or not.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 12:24 PM
6

Say "Well, maybe I DID rape them, and I just cant remember? After all, they are women, so they never lie and I am just a scumbag man, out to rape everything in range"?
/r/MensRights23/06/12 12:18 PM
2

What that guy did sure isnt moral. But if he gets sentenced, the law will be even more fucked up. They withdrew consent long after the act. That should not be possible. Maybe its time to go to my lawyer and drafting that "I give consent in full possession of my mental capabilities, without any form of pressure on me"-paper I've been thinking about.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 09:18 PM
1

This just goes to show: If someone wants to be offended, then you cant do anything against it. @People getting offended: Easiest way to not be offended is, not getting offended.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 07:35 PM
1

So, correctly identifying something as gay is homophobic? He didnt even single it out, it was just as commented as the other subreddits.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 12:16 PM
5

If a potential gf demands all my passwords, I turn 180° and start running. Dont stick your dick in crazy and whatnot.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 12:12 PM
12

You really think that heterosexual men have gay sex twice for every straight encounter? That sounds like one of them conservatives that got caught giving a bj to a man then saying "Totally not gay"
/r/MensRights22/06/12 12:10 PM
2

She's not responsible for the ensuing clusterfuck Yes, she is. She told the lie. You dont have to lie about being raped.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 10:47 AM
1

Sure, just achieve steps 3 and 4 and you will miraculously look very attractive to a lot of people. Just dont be surprised when she wants to hire a good-looking poolboy.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 10:34 AM
2

I actually love the arguments for retirement age: Women live longer. Feminists always say "Strong and independant" or whatnot. Politician proposes upping female retirement age. Feminists try to argue they should be allowed to retire earlier because they are so strong and live longer.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 08:44 PM
3

Wait, you say where a lot of people are murdered, people die earlier? My my, that sounds entirely impossible.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 08:42 PM
-3

They were optional in my class. Students who didnt want to go to (most) of these performances could stay back and do advanced (in the sense of ahead of our lessons) math that gets graded. No one ever stayed back.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:10 PM
52

Chivalry is dead. Because women have the same rights as men today. No reason to give them special rights in that case.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 07:18 PM
15

-_- "seemingly" beeing the operative word. And she may do point out sexism in games (I havent watched her vids), but the kickstarter is laughable. How would she need the 6000 (let alone 150k)$ to make Youtube videos, that, btw, she already gets paid for and does?
/r/MensRights18/06/12 09:46 AM
17

little white lie Yeah, I mean what is a decade of prison between random strangers? Huge jackass, not allowing them to smoke Meaning, either he is law-abiding or he doesnt want his car smelling like tobacco for eternity. Wow, a guy that wants to keep his livelihood (and there are a lot of people that wouldnt drive a smoky taxi), what an asshole. Slander their (innocent) names Yeah, now they cant try it another driver, and if live is fair, they never will be able to drive a taxi ever again. I sure…
/r/MensRights16/06/12 07:08 PM
3

Here in Ukraine, women are really beautiful but at the same time poor and not educated. It is really easy for them to earn money within the sex industry How terrible, they are making good money, maybe enabling their kids to go to good schools /s ...using Ukrainian women as sex slaves This woman seems to not quite get what slaves are. Namely, they get no money and aren't free. The Ukrainian sex workers are free to go and do whatever they want. Theyx just recognized there is a good living to be ma…
/r/MensRights16/06/12 10:37 AM
6

And she would entirely deserve it.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 12:17 AM
10

And its stupid. In actual child porn, children get harmed in production. Thats why its illegal. Drawn pictures are entirely different. No one gets harmed in making them, therefore it shouldnt be illegal. Hell, I take a pedophile watching this over a pedophile kidnapping kids any day.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 12:15 AM
11

Since when are women a minority? Wouldnt that mean that they are, like, <50% of citizens?
/r/MensRights16/06/12 12:08 AM
1

No, but count the times that happens to a female protagonist's love interest.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 02:42 PM
1

Correction, as a man in a videogame your love interest gets kidnapped and you go through 1000s of enemies, exposing yourself to a high risk of death, to save her.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 11:19 AM
1

No, but they have the power to wreck you up something bad, and you never know which are the crazy ones.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:17 PM
1

Its legal where I am in private places. Aka, as long as it is a real office and not a cubicle, you would be able to record away.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:15 PM
1

Get a cam and a voice recorder, always carry/use the recorder in your pocket, place the cam so it overlooks all of your office and record while you are in.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:14 PM
1

I have something. I once found a whole, complete shit a about 2m height on the wall. The fuck?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:09 PM
2

Honestly, I would say it would be important to actually define what "beaten" means. Because a slap can occur sometimes. I got into problems in highschool because I slapped a girl back (with way under my full strength), that had slapped me because she thought I deliberately failed a maths test so she would fail too when she copied my answers. Would that count as "beating"?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 09:56 AM
4

50% of worldwide food gets consumed by women. Just shoot all the women into the sun and the starvation problem is solved. You can send me the Nobel price per package.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 12:38 AM
2

Pff, "she" is probably a costumed man. /s
/r/MensRights13/06/12 12:35 AM
2

Motorcycle driving is stacked retardedly in my country. 18: to 125cc, 21:all Meanwhile, I can drive a giant truck with 18.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 12:34 AM
2

Why so much stuff? 4 socks, 2 jeans, 2 black t-shirts, 2 pair of shoes (1 work, 1 other), 2 jackets(1 winter, 1 fall) are all the clothes I have and it is enough.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 12:32 AM
2

Easy fix: abolish women's sports, just throw them in with the men, never see a female pro ever again.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 12:55 PM
6

Do you work for EA? Sounds like it. Anyways, Ramseys tone is normal in a kitchen. You always have 1 big boss there, he screams at the underbosses, they scream at you.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 08:25 AM
5

Because joke? At least I hope it was one.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 12:51 PM
2

Firstly: It wont affect the legal proceedings, but just to set it right: Weed cant make you physically addicted. Only the act of taking it can be addicting, therefore your wife could replace it with self-rolled cigarettes, for example. Secondly: You said the police had no right to enter. You and your wife are residents. If either of you asks them in, they have. I obviously dont know your situation all that well, but I would try talking to her family (where she is now). Maybe you can convince the…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 08:04 PM
2

Why would you try to "keep your marriage"? I think your wife destroyed it when she kidnapped your kid, no?
/r/MensRights09/06/12 08:01 PM
2

1.9m (6.2') here. I am living in Europe, wish I was shorter. Lots of old houses here, I bump my head on about 1/5 of doors. Every time I enter a cellar, I bump my head. Half the time I get into a car, I bump my head (and I cant drive non-SUVs, as I would always have my head on the ceiling or I would have to adjust my seat to a non-regulations degree. Oh, and I cant work well at normal surfaces. Normal chairs are too tall for me to comfortably work at normal tables, standing for 1 or 2 hours cutt…
/r/MensRights08/06/12 06:42 PM
1

You're a hero. /s
/r/MensRights08/06/12 06:24 PM
2

Teenage(Highschool) aged girls arent exactly at ease around men. Hormones and stuff. I bet you werent at ease with the other sex during puberty either :D
/r/MensRights07/06/12 09:41 PM
11

For anybody thats interested, heres the website mentioned: http://gogirls.wayne.edu/index.php I dont really see any discrimination in the mail. It makes sense for a program for girls to be run by girls, since it easire to bond/trust for them (similiar experiences). Now, the interesting question would be if there is a program like this for males.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 08:59 PM
1

. If you can't have an honest conversation with your SO about needing time off/being able to smoke, etc, then don't get mad at the woman or society My gf aint the problem. Society scolds you for doing it. Try telling someone you are a member in a smoker's club (even irngoring the fact that in many european countries, smoking in bars is prohibited, meaning you cant have a whisky with your cigar). Try telling somebody that you play Poker once a week. Same goes for bars, etc... Oh, and should you f…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 12:36 PM
4

Heres what I think: Gaming was one of the last, more or less socially acceptable "male spaces", where men can be men. Now, women got into gaming, but we men are (understandibly) loath to give up our space. Therefore, we still behave like we were under male company. Some women take it seriously (many more dont), and are offended. Its just what happens when adrenaline flares. Heck, I cant even count how often I called (probably) male players names because they behaved extremely stupid and cost the…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 12:29 PM
7

Thing is, its not ok to have male-only organizations. Bigger male-only groups always get a publicity-problem, since a women at some point tries to join and complains that she isnt allowed to. That exact thing happened with an old tradional golf club. Women complained she cant get in to play their tournament, press throws a hissy-fit, club lets her in. I think this is one of the problems men face. Men need some non-women time, since we behave differently when in a women's presence. Its a kind of …
/r/MensRights04/06/12 07:07 PM
0

Actually, Harry Potter is pretty well-written. Rowling is a good author, no reason not to read her books.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 07:02 PM
3

I wouldnt say that. I mean, if someone calls me a child molester, I damn well want to know who it is.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 06:57 PM
98

Pro-tip to Barnes and Noble: Dont throw someone out because a random customer complains, just send an employee over there to see if he is a child molester or not. Btw: Why can't females be child molesters too?
/r/MensRights04/06/12 02:32 PM
2

I didnt say it makes sense to regulate it with strengh. But it would at least be better than the gender-regulated punishment now, with still preserving the intent the lawmakers put forward for it (so they could change it without embarassment). Personally, I think judges will use the relative strength to gauge the severity of the crime anyways. Doesnt have to be an extra law.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 01:29 AM
2

Meaning, if you assault a woman NC, you might as well go ahead and beat her in a coma. Hey, maybe they wont even catch you without a witness /s That is just BS. If they want to account for difference in strength, they should write that in the law. How about "if the perpretator has a muscle mass exceeding +10% of the victim, its a A1"?
/r/MensRights03/06/12 11:16 PM
1

A good motto, in a good g.novel.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 11:12 PM
2

It should have stayed "Too bad that mortar doesnt burn" (Schade dass Beton nicht brennt). Sadly, I was born too late to participate in the active leftist scene. All you see today is talk, talk, talk and never results.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 11:09 PM
8

Oh my, and I am a communist MRA :D Nah, in all seriousness, I know with whom I can talk about politics. Its pretty easy to pick out if you just mention news bits here and there. Example relevant to MRA: "Hey, heard about that woman that chopped her husbands penis of because she thought he cheated? Pretty gruesome, huh?" When you hear answers like "he deserved it", then dont talk to them.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 11:06 PM
11

Oh, come on. You learn from an early age that a persons body belongs to them and you cant assault them in any way. At least I did.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 10:59 PM
3

They don't rape because no one told them not to when they were in school. Totally right there. They rape because they have a penis, you see? /s
/r/MensRights03/06/12 10:57 PM
4

... A man with the defense of "I was high" would be fucked even more. But its a woman, so its totally OK.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 01:50 AM
7

No one "deserves" forgiveness by default. She hasnt done anything to warrant forgiving her. Yes, she admitted she lied, but she has got no retaliation whatsoever for that and surely she doesnt sound all that repentant to me.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 01:45 AM
5

Meh. I hate kids too. They are loud, annoying, stand in your way constantly... But if other people want kids, Im Ok with that. They should just maybe get different flats (in other blocks, so you cant hear them). And, of course, teach their kids not to run around supermarkets blocking other people, beeing loud there, and not properly parenting them (When your kid throws random stuff in other peoples shopping cards its not "Just kids", it can cost a bunch of money). Oh, and ffs, teach them not to …
/r/MensRights30/05/12 09:10 PM
3

I'd actually fear for my life if I'd stay. Creating a life for you to stay with her isnt far from her chaining you in the cellar or just killing you and burying you there.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 09:05 PM
35

Also, fraud. She got 1.5 million out of it.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 08:56 PM
57

In other words, it prevents other "victims" from coming forward and getting no punishment whatsoever.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 08:54 PM
1

Talks in classrooms about how women are pressured by men to go into the half-time job, so they will never decide later that they want to care for the family (since that is always represented as beeing oppressed). Media outrage about that kind of thing. It has gotten so much into the mind of people that a friend of mine actually got called out on his gf wanting to work half-time to raise their kid. Of course, women rates for corporations. The last I heard was a 30% women rate being in discussion,…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 01:39 PM
4

Problem is, that Japan has a strong performance-based society, meaning that men with huge paychecks are heavily favored, to the point were men without that have next to no chance (because they have problems providing for their family). Now, coupled with the problem that in Japan the "Your Elders, your betters" Mindset is still going strong, that means that older man get better chances at marriage then young ones, because they make more money. Now, of course, young people easily give up at the wh…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 07:02 AM
1

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/30/japan-population-decline-youth-no-sex_n_1242014.html Article about this stuff.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:54 AM
5

I agree with you, that a women should be free to abort when she wants. However, I think that when the father wants an abortion and the mother doesnt, he shouldnt have to pay for the child (or at least a lot less). Problem beeing, that there are women who have sex with men, give them a condom that is "accidentily" perforated and then get money from them.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:45 AM
3

In my country, the women's minister is trying to close the wage-gap by coercing women into full time jobs. While she advocates "choice".
/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:30 AM
1

bubbly, just like you Wait, am I getting this wrong or did the wine bottle just call the women drinking it fat?
/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:23 AM
3

After reading this, I had an excellent idea how to combat the Terrorrists once and for all. Just arrest all male muslims between the ages of 15 and 70. Problem solved. Can I get my Nobel Peace Price now plz? /s And this is massively fucked up. So, basically, you can now be shot for beeing the wrong gender at the wrong time. Huh. Wonder what would happen if Obama decided to do the same for woman. I bet then its sexist.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:18 AM
1

Not if he runs fast enough into the right country.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:12 AM
1

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/30/japan-population-decline-youth-no-sex_n_1242014.html
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:39 PM
1

Yep. Your sweet-talk clearly is overloading her tiny female brain. /s
/r/MensRights29/05/12 02:09 PM
1

How many couples do give explicit consent before having sex at all? At least for me it always happened. You dont ask: "Are you in full possession of your mental capacity and consent to have a sexual encounter with me?".
/r/MensRights29/05/12 02:05 PM
1

"Sex Police"... You a porn producer? 'Cause you got the naming nailed.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 02:00 PM
1

Yes. Yes there is. There was a similiar list by... Mhhh, I forgot the name, but it was a radical feminist that wanted to "abort" her teenage son because she caught him watching porn.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:56 PM
1

I would guess they are connected. Gang warfare means there are gangs, means there are people that have weapons and are heavily desensitized towards violence. Its the same issue, really. Get rid of the drug war, get rid of the people doing the assaulting.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:46 PM
2

The rise of asexuals. Or at least voluntary celibacy. Look to Japan. Its a great problem there. Heck, I am thinking of becoming a monk, because fuck all this. Some little mountain monastery... Too bad its next to impossible to become a hermit nowadays.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:39 PM
1

No, you see, many feminists see you lone existence as rape to women. So they cant accuse you falsely, since you clearly exist.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:37 PM
1

"little lie"... Yep, it can get him behind bars for a decade, but its just a little lie. Its depressing to see such people exist, really. Good thing that I am already a misanthrope.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:35 PM
0

Photos of these assholes girls crying their eyes out at court because they are soooooo innocent?
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:33 PM
4

I'd say against a woman that sticks an innocent into jail for years for money, the other person is pretty much the better person by default.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:27 PM
2

You dont become a better man by letting you get fucked over. When something like this happens, you have to fight back, not forgive and forget ffs.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:26 PM
2

The funny thing is, Gender equality and womans rights directly conflict. Either you have human rights regardless of gender, or you have no equality.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:21 PM
14

They have the same standards to enter combat as male soldiers (well, where I live at least). Thats the reason there are no woman in large parts of the special forces. They just dont make it. Of course, the standards shouldnt be lowered.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:16 PM
2

I see it like this: I dont hit people that dont hit me/a friend/some random guy unproveked. If people do hit one of those, I use the necessary force to subdue. I simply dont treat the genders different. Why the fuck should I?
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter