TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GiskardReventlov Archive

View 7 posts and 251 comments by GiskardReventlov on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Is this a thing? I have never heard of this.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 04:57 AM
2

Mr. X I think they mean Herr K. His Trial is not over.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:37 PM
15

I can't answer most of your questions since I'm not female, but I do want to say that I believe question 5 is based on false premises. It is not a mainstream MRA opinion that "women are oppressing and default manipulators."
/r/MensRights02/03/16 07:51 AM
368

This would be much more valuable if it included references to the statistics cited.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 08:41 PM
2

Low-effort posts like this belong in /r/MensRants if they belong anywhere at all.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 03:34 AM
4

Good catch. Wrong tag. "Intactivism" refers to activism against forced circumcision.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:30 PM
2

In classical, "human" would be distinguished from "ape-man" or similar terms for non-civilized humanoids Actually, the -man in human has nothing to do with the English word man. They are false friends. Human comes from Latin, and man comes from Germanic.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 03:56 PM
3

Yes, there is certainly the possibility for a self selection bias in OKCupid membership, either for skewedly attractive men or skewedly judgemental women. There's no way of knowing in which of the two nor in which directions any biases might exist. However, the sample sizes are quite large, so even if they don't accurately describe the whole population of the US, they constitute an unbiased dataset for a decently sized subpopulation.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 06:40 PM
36

http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-looks-and-online-dating/
/r/MensRights20/08/15 11:51 AM
6

Apparently, I'm tagged as a /r/TheRedPill user. I don't think I've ever posted or up/downvoted anything in that subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 04:02 PM
1

I'd like to believe it happens as often as it actually happens. No more, no less.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 10:58 PM
5

I agree. Unless poor treatment was leading to a disproportionate amount of men dying, then there's not much to talk about. It seems, though I don't know the exact numbers, that 94% male deaths would be expected based on the disproportionately male prison population. Nothing surprising in this figure.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 05:55 PM
3

The unequal pay for the same work myth is quoted so frequently, it's easy for someone who isn't a skeptic to believe it. Not everyone who quotes it is lying to further their agenda. Many people are simply misinformed. If the myth were true, I think many MRAs would be in favor of some sort of corrective government assistance for women as well.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:02 PM
17

Does the OP not know that this is the default male-female embrace pose? Male's arm on female's back, female's arm on male's neck.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:43 PM
8

They could still allow the option, and create a male-only floor upon sufficient demand. I mean they could in theory, but in my experience, the least competent people on Earth work in university residence life offices.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 07:41 PM
13

You're allowed to agree with something somebody says while not agreeing with everything they say. /r/MensRights has pro-MRA articles from most news organizations at least occasionally. The NY Post isn't an MRA organization either, but we get some good articles from them. Return of Kings is not an MRA website, but that doesn't mean they can't say anything of value. That's not to say anything good or bad about the content of this post in particular. Judge content based on its own merits and not wh…
/r/MensRights06/06/15 05:52 PM
3

Good on the paper for publishing the article. Bad on them for silencing controversy.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 02:38 AM
5

It's true that if you take the average income of every woman in the US, and take the average income of every man in the US, the first figure is .77 times the second. The false part is interpreting this to mean that a woman makes .77 times less than a man for the same work. The types of work women do are very different on average than the types of work men do.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 11:31 PM
1

Petty grievances might be better suited in /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 01:06 AM
5

I'm going with either fake or a dark joke.
/r/PussyPass25/04/15 03:56 AM
1

Can someone explain what's going on in this story and what it has to do with men's rights? I read the article and don't see anything about men's rights.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:35 PM
7

The punchline relies on the stereotypical idea that men all want women to sexually assault them. Doesn't sound like "getting it" to me.
/r/PussyPass03/03/15 04:00 AM
7

True. This chapter, Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, covers Vermont, New Hampshire, and southern Maine. Not an insignificant part of Planned Parenthood, but not the whole organization either.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:54 PM
18

This is better suited to /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:45 PM
3

Not really "again." This article is from 2013.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 06:32 AM
10

Someone suggested to me that he might have gotten that number from the heavily brigaded survey that was scrapped, and that he simply linked to a different one without checking (or in spite of checking) to see that it didn't have the same results as the brigaded one.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:20 PM
3

That is interesting. While it is possible it was an error, it fits so well into the author's narrative about MRAs only pretending to care about individual rights issues that I doubt it is.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:28 PM
34

Another, broader study of the Men's Rights movement on Reddit found that 84 percent identified as "strongly conservative," with particular policy preferences along a libertarian, not traditional, bent. That's a bizarre lie. The link says nothing of the sort. If you do the math, the number from that survey is 28% libertarian, 7% republican, 27% democrat, and 38% independent.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:20 PM
30

The assertion Consent is NOT possible if one person is under the influence of alcohol or drugs and the presupposition in the question You are in a relationship and have had sex with your partner before. Do you still need to get their consent to have sex if they have been drinking? Yes No are mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 07:04 PM
3

if they can't handle the world, bitches need to go back to the kitchen I don't think OP was suggesting women belong in the kitchen. I think the point was that if women are unwilling to accept the equal accountability for their actions that comes with equal rights, then the only fair alternative is for them to give back those equal rights, e.g. working outside the home.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 05:30 PM
1

And why all jews are pro-forced-circumcision.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 06:27 AM
2

Few groups hate women as much as feminists do.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 09:27 PM
1

Does there have to be a problem with this? Not everything feminist do is a blow to men and boys. This seems to be a good gesture.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 10:41 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudette_Colvin
/r/MensRights18/12/14 01:44 AM
6

Hi all, just a quick note on moderation in this thread. We'd like to keep circumcision of boys out of this particular conversation- although the two issues are superficially related the effects and cultural practices/significance are very, very different, and essentially they're two separate debates. We're aware this can seem frustrating, but we've found in the past that bringing circumcision into the debate skewers conversation of a very important and serious subject completely off topic- it ca…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:32 PM
0

OP, if you want a non-AVFM source, just click the links on the bottom of the page.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 06:39 AM
41

Using the BIMS to gauge a dementia sufferer’s ability to make sexual and other decisions is a mistake made by many long-term care facilities, said Susan Wehry, a geriatric psychiatrist and commissioner of the Vermont state department that investigates sexual and other abuse in nursing homes. “I’m sensitive to the nursing home’s desire to protect their resident and certainly to the daughters’ desire to protect their mother,” Wehry said. “The BIMS in this case tells me nothing except that she has …
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:21 PM
2

Not a source, but the explanation I've heard beyond "misery loves company" is that if you admit to yourself that mutilating your child's genitals is a terrible thing for you to do to them, then you have to admit that mutilating your genitals was a terrible thing for your parents to have done to you. Most people don't want to think of their parents as having done something horrible, and (despite the feminist subculture desperately wanting to) most people don't want to see themselves as victims.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 03:27 PM
1

Unfortunately, Mankind Initiative isn't on Amazon's list. Have any other picks?
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:08 AM
0

My point was that the article doesn't say "bad service" or any other reason why the john tried to get his money back. For most service-related reasons, I agree with you. However, if he went in planning to not let her keep the money no matter what, then it wasn't a service transaction, but fraud and, in my opinion, rape by deception.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 09:11 PM
3

On the one hand, it's good that she has been punished for making a false report. On the other hand, it seems that the john did in fact rape her. She consented to sex under the condition that she be paid for her services, and he violated those conditions. The article doesn't mention why the john requested his money back, and if there was some reasonable reason, then I wouldn't call this rape, but if it was simply to scam her out of the money, then I would say it was rape.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:51 PM
2

The U.S. courts are also heavily racially biased, don't forget.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 05:07 AM
1

/u/chocoboat is clearly making an articulate argument in good faith, whether or not you find it convincing. Remember, downvotes are not for disagreement.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 03:17 AM
1

I expected "you're the father."
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:34 PM
29

MRAs don't need to resort to No True Scotsmen fallacies to maintain legitimacy. It's sufficient and more honest to say that the vast majority of MRAs condemn violence.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 06:24 PM
1

No, only men's rea.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 02:52 AM
2

It's still mixed, I'd say. More socially acceptable than skirts or makeup for sure, but it's generally not acceptable for business attire and draws more casual criticism than short hair for girls. It might also vary somewhat by where you live.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 10:15 PM
3

Having short hair, wearing pants, smoking cigarettes, and working outside the home all have been seen as exclusively masculine in the past, but are now seen as completely socially acceptable for women to do. Having long hair, wearing skirts, wearing makeup, and working as a homemaker are all still socially unacceptable for men.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:02 PM
9

Relevant paragraph: It was a performance of violence (not violence against women) where – unsurprisingly – the oppressor was male and the abused was vulnerable and scared. We felt it was important, strong, well and thoroughly considered that the test subject was a woman. This is important within the context of Lush's wider Fighting Animal Testing campaign, which challenges consumers of cosmetics (a female market) to feel, to think and to demand that the cosmetics industry is animal-cruelty free.…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 01:45 PM
1

/r/WomensRights
/r/MensRights19/10/14 03:39 PM
1

This seems to be fake. If this is supposed to have happened this Monday, this is the show transcript. I didn't read the whole thing, but CTRL+F doesn't show me any mention of husband, fantasize, rolling pin, divorce, or anything else I could think of.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 07:17 PM
1

Could you find it for us?
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:29 AM
2

It's not impossible. OP seems to have just gotten unlucky in several ways.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 11:44 AM
0

I don't trust any statistics sourced by a newspaper. I was hoping for a properly published scientific or government study with a fully described methodology. Still, thank you for the links.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 12:26 PM
8

I'd also like to see a graphic with the death and injury rates for all those jobs.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 09:00 PM
15

Can anyone find the source of these statistics? I looked but had no luck. I'm curious if the 53% is actually of false reports or just unsubstantiated reports.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 03:33 PM
3

It's probably the one place where I diverge with the MRM. I think views about age of consent vary widely among the MRM, as it does among the general population. I think the bigger issue for the MRM is how age of consent laws are applied unequally to boys and girls, and to men and women. More unbiased research would be nice here. Though it may not be exactly what you're looking for, there's some good information here.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 03:14 PM
9

There are many good reasons other than hookups to continue using condoms.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 06:32 PM
2

Did you take this, OP? What was the context? I've seen plenty of forms which have separate mother and father sections, and the inclusion of the step-mother option makes me think this form is trying to figure out if the child's parents are divorced and who the child is currently living with.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:01 AM
2

Presumably as evidence of the defense's claim of "abused woman syndrome." Though this is in South Africa, and I don't know how the law works over there.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:16 PM
7

I won't support him because I'm pro-choice (for women and men), I think it's an important issue for women's rights, and I don't think we should have someone who is against women's rights represent the men's rights movement, as we are generally not against women's rights.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:18 AM
15

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_that_proves_the_rule
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:35 AM
-7

Setting it up in advance to say to stop during sex makes her a dick, but I don't see how it's illegal for her to do, nor how it isn't rape for him to not stop after she says to.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:19 PM
0

Set up how? Did she not really say to stop?
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:03 PM
-5

Perhaps I am misunderstanding the story, but this sounds like a real case of rape to me. 30 seconds is a long time to continue going after someone says to stop and pushed you away. 4 years in prison might be disproportionate to the crime, but I don't have any problem calling this a case of rape.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:13 PM
1

L&O often defaults to public perception, but almost always will break that status quo at some point. The show covers corrupt cops, false rape reports, lack of sympathy for male victims, unreliability of eye witness testimony, etc. For the most casual viewer, the status quo might be the only thing they absorb, but I think the episodes where they stray from it are usually thought-provoking.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 02:48 AM
1

Not necessarily. Firstly, there's a huge difference between rape and rape culture. It's a fact that rapes happen. However, the hypothesis surrounding the causes, prevalence, and views of rape within society called "rape culture" isn't something the police or even district attorneys directly interact with, so L&O:SVU isn't primarily about rape culture. That said, L&O is always about various and conflicting problems and opinions about society, and rape culture is certainly something L&O:SVU will t…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:47 PM
30

Some feminists believe if you admit it's possible for people to take actions which lower their risk of becoming victims of crimes then you're blaming them when those crimes happen to them if they didn't take those actions. They would prefer if people didn't know what they can do to have a better chance of avoiding becoming victims.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 10:41 PM
8

A source close to Mr Starmer was quoted by the Mail as saying Fry “went off on one”, and said there were already laws in place to deter “faked accusations” of sexual abuse. The feminist mantra of "it's not a problem and I've already solved it" is spreading.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:00 PM
3

I heard "ancient graffiti" but was disappointed. This is the good stuff.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 09:50 PM
22

I think /r/MensRants might be a better place to post this.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 04:14 PM
4

MRA is not the opposite of female. Male is.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 02:11 AM
38

I don't think there's some sexist programmer back there meddling with things. It's probably some automated algorithm that finds similar phrases which are searched more frequently and suggests them.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:31 AM
0

We already knew you were going to say that.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:04 AM
1

It's solid advice for anyone.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:07 PM
2

I'm in full agreement that forced child circumcision is a bad thing. However, I won't let my opinions on the morality affect my understanding of the facts involved. We shouldn't go around claiming circumcision doesn't help prevent HIV transmission as an argument against forced child circumcision if, in fact, it does.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:45 AM
-3

There have been a large number of other studies with different methodologies which don't have the same problems as the studies in your link (except none of them are double-blinds which isn't feasible for this issue). The meta-analysis mentions several, and I posted several of them here.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:06 AM
5

No problem. No one is helped by not having the facts. If you find information that disagrees with me, I'd love to hear it too. Where are we in the last 13 years? Google Scholaring "hiv circumcision" shows several more recent studies. The first result isn't a study, but the next two links are studies supporting circumcision having an effect. They don't give specifics on condom use for example. Were circumcised men more likely to use condoms? I think condom use isn't common enough in sub-Saharan A…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:33 AM
-3

you'll never find a scientific pere reviewed study that says circumcision has any health benefits what so ever This is simply factually incorrect. The WHO is not a religious organization but supports health claims of circumcision (in sub-Saharan Africa). Here is a meta-analysis of various studies, some of which the WHO based their stance on. I can get you some more sources for other claims if you like. Of course, moderate health benefits do not negate the various negative aspects of forced circu…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:12 AM
5

I'm also curious about the relative demographics of subs like /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 07:38 AM
5

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adultery#United_States Technically, yes in many states, but it's extremely rare that it's enforced.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 09:30 PM
0

trifles a matter, affair, or circumstance of trivial importance or significance
/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:53 AM
3

You may get love.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 09:09 PM
1

So now she wants to change her stance I think possibly the stupidest possible critique of a person is saying they are able to and have changed their mind on a topic. Being able to change one's mind when exposed to new facts is the definition of being a rational person.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 04:39 AM
9

Women’s Aid argues that this is inappropriate when there are many more women than men experiencing greater harm from repeated violence women are several times more likely to experience a pattern of coercive control – repeated instances The total amount of violence = number of people affected * frequency of violence per person. If men and women are equally affected by domestic violence, it can't be the case that more women are affected and women are affected more frequently on average. Women's Ai…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:31 PM
29

Fuck you! I'm marrying the Borg Queen and there's nothing you can do to stop me!
/r/MensRights03/03/14 11:28 PM
14

“Founders are looking for ‘objective’ measures such as school ranking, GPAs, SAT scores, but fail to recognize that these are biased." At some point, if all measurements say two groups are performing differently, you should change your belief from "the tests are biased" to "the groups are different."
/r/MensRights17/02/14 06:20 AM
6

In case anyone wants a source on that: .gov link
/r/MensRights07/02/14 07:49 PM
2

The real Big Name among female scientists would actually be Emmy Noether.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 10:17 AM
38

Differentiating consensual sex and rape, the Supreme Court said, "Rape is the most morally and physically reprehensible crime in a society, as it is an assault on the body, mind and privacy of the victim. While a murderer destroys the physical frame of the victim, a rapist degrades and defiles the soul of a helpless female. I knew people thought like this, but to actually read government officials say aloud that rape is worse than murder is mind-boggling.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:23 AM
21

Men are idiots and perverts if they want sex to be pleasurable, huh? And some morons say misandry isn't real.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:46 AM
8

2/10. Only slightly below average trolling. Keep working on it.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 04:21 AM
9

Not all men's rights issues are due to people actively fighting against men's rights. Most are due to normal people in a society that discriminates against men.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 05:54 AM
2

She is pregnant. It gets worse, I believe I could hangle a pregnacy on its own. However the long and the short of it is that it was a one night stand with a girl I met at a bar who just so happened to have a fake ID and after the condom broke and we went to go get plan B she told me she was not 20 but 17. After our first negative pregnancy test takin two weeks later she informed me she lied again and was in fact 16 soon to be 17. Now we have waited 2 weeks and taken another test, twice, and both…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 11:22 PM
1

You realize I was quoting the article, right?
/r/MensRights08/04/13 02:11 PM
6

Are you somehow laboring under the misapprehension that most misandry is propagated by feminists? There's plenty to go around.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 03:48 PM
2

Including "forced coitus" in the definition of rape would solve the issue Not quite. "Coitus" refers to penetration between a man and a woman. It still wouldn't cover a male perpetrator forcing his male victim to penetrate him, a female perpetrator forcing oral sex on her male victim, etc.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 02:20 PM
17

Unfortunately, men’s rights activist and the organizations they politically affiliate themselves with hold other anti-modern, proto-fascist sentiments such as opposition to same sex marriage, immigration, women in the workplace and the economic advancement of non-white citizens. This is what happens when you only listen to your detractors' arguments as they have been strawmanned by people you already agree with.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:00 PM
13

Actually, it doesn't mean either. Just because one is false, it doesn't make the other true. False dichotomy.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 10:27 PM
1

I'm sorry, are you referring to the website Gawker or gawking at the claims made in feminist websites?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:53 PM
2

A feminist acquaintance of mine posted this on Facebook. Here was my analysis: This article has quite a few problems. I'm going to ignore the part where the author asserts misogyny in society is a bigger problem than misandry in society is without an argument other than a metaphor which assumes its conclusion. I'm going to focus on the author's claim that feminism actually does address men's rights issues. From the section ""A List of "Men's Rights" Issues That Feminism Is Already Working On": "…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:34 PM
4

I've heard a different version: Q: How many feminists does it take to change a light bulb? A: That isn't funny!
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:48 AM
3

I would rephrase it as men's versus women's styles. If a woman wants a crew cut, she should be able to get it for $10 like a man can.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:18 AM
18

Many MRAs do. It is often called "legal paternal surrender" or decreasingly popularly "financial abortion."
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:15 AM
1

In the studies I've seen, the frequency of demonstrably false rape allegations falls within a range of 2% to 8%. 2% is a conservative estimate and 5% is an "average" of the range.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:54 PM
2

Make sure to post the lecture once it's uploaded to YouTube.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:58 PM
0

The men's rights movement doesn't claim to be an equality movement, and it especially doesn't claim to be The One And Only Equality Movement like feminism does. The men's rights movement is a reaction to the lack of compassion for men's issues in the modern "social justice" movement. It is meant to be complementary to a women's rights movement.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 09:17 AM
2

That sounds completely reasonable to me. But now I no longer see why you said that you would react differently if the teenager were male or female. Force should be proportional to threat level, not to testosterone level. You shouldn't relent because the assailant is female if she's committing the same offense.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 07:12 AM
2

I'm not advocating beating anyone up. I'm just pointing out the difference in what happened to the girl and what would have happened to a guy. However, I don't see why you think it isn't perfectly fair to disable a female assailant to the same degree as you would a male assailant. If someone is assaulting you, you should have every right to force them to stop. You appear to be advocating for men to not be able to defend themselves against, which sounds a lot like "man up and take it."
/r/MensRights02/03/13 06:34 AM
2

I mean people on the train would have beaten the shit out of him instead of chuckling at him.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 06:18 AM
2

If a boy her age (16?) was slapping women on that train, what do you think would have happened? Hint: The reaction would have been much worse than how-can-she-slap.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 05:52 AM
5

Even if the comment was sarcastic, it still doesn't add to the discussion. Everyone here already knows feminists think not supporting a woman in a potential rape scenario is evil.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:34 PM
2

I just posed the Wiki article on Duluth model. I didn't bring it up, and I don't know how it relates to the idea that rape is about power. However, if you want alternate reasons why people would rape, I'd guess it varies from rapist to rapist, but the obvious answer would be desire for sex.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 02:46 AM
2

Wiki
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:45 PM
6

Redditor for 0 days Negative karma. There's absolutely no reason to have a "long term relationship" with a woman as a man. You can get all the sex you want without it. brainwashed by the Jewish media as they were before Jewish Marxism corrupted my world I'm having a hard time buying that you're not a troll.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 12:26 AM
2

In reality, accidental pregnancy is a vastly greater risk than spermjacking, and simply not having vaginal sex will get you to an approximately 0% chance of fatherhood. However, if you're that afraid of spermjacking, personally dispose of your condom after use.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 04:37 PM
2

However, it's about the worst she could do legally while having her friends congratulate her for it.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 04:34 PM
1

When you say bathrooms in a men's rights context, all I can think of is the issue of segregation and the fear of men intruding on a women's space with their threatening maleness. Maybe you could find a way to visually compare the bathroom signs with the whites only drinking fountains of the past and ostracized men with ostracized blacks.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:18 AM
2

Another option aside from total abstinence is to abstain only from penile-vaginal penetration. Manual, oral, and anal are generally better than nothing.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:17 PM
14

The article that Wiki cites for the French and German bans only mentions France. It seems like Germany was erroneously included.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 11:46 PM
1

Why would the men's rights movement dedicate its time and resources to solving a women's rights problem which is already being addressed by several larger movements which have government funding, university funding, and good public relations? The men's rights movement was created to address men's rights issues, and we're struggling to got those issues recognized. We don't need feminists trying to get us to stop focusing on those issues so that they never have to hear about how women aren't utter…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:53 PM
-1

redditor for 11 months
/r/MensRights06/02/13 11:03 AM
3

Men aren't the only ones who would need to enact abstinence if they want 100% zero risk of pregnancy. Men aren't any more special. However, men are the only ones who need to be abstinent if they want zero risk of having to raise a child. Women never have any risk of raising a child they don't want. I don't see how you've managed to miss that being my point.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 09:29 AM
2

Guess what, life has consequences and people are gonna learn it the hard way. You knock a woman up, you're EQUALLY responsible for that new bit of life. Not prepared? Don't do it. It's as simple as that. You're BOTH responsible for taking a step back and saying whooooa, this could end in pregnancy, we shouldn't do this. But neither of you did, now you both pay the price. Men are FULLY aware that the woman has the choice should pregnancy occur, but choose sex anyway. Don't like it, don't have sex…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 09:00 AM
2

No woman has to have an abortion or have a child. And no woman should. What women should have to do is bear the burden of having complete reproductive autonomy while men have no reproductive choices. If a woman is the only one who wants a child, she has to be the only one to raise it. Anything else gives women complete and total control over any man they have sex with.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 08:34 AM
3

If you don't want to pay child support, don't risk having a baby by having sex. The consequences go both ways, not just for the one who physically pops the baby out. Your sperm was there just like her egg was there. If you don't want to raise a child, don't risk having a baby by having sex. End abortion now! You feminists sound exactly like pro-lifer Republicans the second the issue is pro-man and not pro-woman. I challenge you to respond without using the catchphrase "her body, her choice."
/r/MensRights06/02/13 08:18 AM
4

I'm interested in seeing a source for this claim.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:48 AM
16

I don't know of any MRAs who would stop a man who wanted circumcision from getting it for himself. We just want men who don't want it to not have had it forced on them at birth.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:37 AM
32

I agree 100%. Circumcision is a personal opinion thing. The person who gets to have the opinion is the person whose penis gets cosmetic surgery done on it. Not his mother. Not his father. Him. When he is old enough to make that decision. And not when he is an infant. Other people being allowed that decision for men is a crime against humanity.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:33 AM
3

Being an idiot isn't trolling. r/mensrights supports free speech.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:38 PM
3

Very nice! You have my vote!
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:55 AM
6

you're both extreme socialist, feminist, anti-male trolls Socialist? I'm afraid to ask how that's relevant to anything or pejorative.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 08:12 AM
11

They are not feminists despite how much they might insist that they are. They're... something else. I'd call no true Scotsman, but you're probably right. When you're constantly racist, sex negative, and against good body image in addition to being sexist, it really is counter to the historical narrative of the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 09:46 PM
3

"Knuckle justice"? Is this a real thing? Is assaulting somebody who called you names legal in America? I've never heard of such a thing before.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:45 AM
4

This is a good question. You may want to ask some feminists.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:37 AM
1

Yeah, you got me now. Sure, something else dangerous could have the same effect, but I would say the same thing about it then. I don't consider guns an enemy. I'm slightly in favor of guns. However, I see them as a somewhat dangerous object the benefits of which outweigh the dangers. I'm just trying to communicate which dangers I consider to be relevant to gun ownership. Kids are crafty; they can get their parents' guns even if the gun is relatively well locked up.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 07:05 AM
-1

You're trying to have an argument where there is none, so I'm finished.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 06:52 AM
1

Alright. I never said they did. I specifically said that wasn't my point. I point was that guns do kill people in otherwise preventable situations.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 06:40 AM
2

I don't see how any of that is in disagreement with what I said.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 06:29 AM
2

Well, guns are responsible for some deaths. Kids break into gun safes and hurt themselves or others. It wouldn't happen without the gun, and there's no such thing as a foolproof safe. Not that that's a reason to ban guns, but it's certainly a counterexample to your claim.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 05:43 AM
7

My favorite part is the no true Scotsman tag line. ** This group is for real MRAs without the 'inclusiveness'. ** DO NOT POST LINKS TO: Feminist shills LGBT anything
/r/MensRights26/02/12 03:33 AM
1

I asked a question. A question can't be fallacious. And how does you being the biological father ruin the analogy? Is being the biological father of a child the only factor that contributes to whether you should pay to raise the child? If not, than even if I were asserting that you should pay to raise other children, then I would not be engaging in a false equivalence fallacy.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 07:21 AM
2

There are lots of homeless kids out there. Why don't you start paying to raise some of them?
/r/MensRights25/02/12 07:04 AM
2

No. I stand by my original statement.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 11:00 AM
2

You're being a bit ridiculous here with the pedophile bit. It's not a sexual motivation that makes a parent want their child to suit their sense of aesthetics. Find me a parent who wants their kid to grow up unattractive by their own standards.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 10:05 AM
3

That's not an ad hominem. The use of an ad hominem fallacy means that the arguer claims to be correct based on some property of the person he is arguing with, e.g. you are bad so you are wrong about this topic. petulant_snowflake isn't arguing with the military because you aren't yourself the military (even if you are in the military). The relevant complaint you could make is that he is begging the question that it is bad for the police to act like the military.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:46 AM
1

Oh, I see. Well, it was a reductio ad absurdum argument, though not a reductio ad absurdum fallacy because it didn't set up a false dichotomy. He could claim begging the question in regard to it not being good for the police to be like the military, which seems to be what he's going for.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:40 AM
5

He didn't actually actually engage in a reduction ad absurdum fallacy. His claim of ad hominem was just false. Also, even if it were true, it sounded like he was attempting to argue using a fallacy fallacy.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:14 AM
2

I'm going with "probably."
/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:35 PM
1

Well, I won't argue definitions with you, but I don't think it makes much of a difference to the topic at hand. Also, when was the last time "flamer" was used in common speech, 2005?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:34 PM
1

Could you explain how they are not mutually exclusive? Just because you decide something is egalitarian does not make it so. Obviously in the circumstances you're thinking of, the MRAs disagree with your decision. Of course, simply because the MRAs claim someone is a troll, that does not make them a troll either.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:57 PM
2

push your agenda troll These are nearly mutually exclusive. "Pushing your agenda" means you want to convince people to agree with what you say. "Trolling" means saying things just to upset people.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:14 PM
2

If you want media to continue to be made, you need editors and publishers, etc. Jobs for stuff like English exist and are valuable, just not in demand.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 09:11 AM
1

The problem isn't that Sociology and (possibly) English are useless. They're just not in demand. They're relatively easy degrees with relatively little practical content, so naturally, the job market is saturated with people with their qualifications. STEM is a good investment for the government because STEM students are in social demand, not because STEM is the only useful thing.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 06:00 AM
0

To fix the legal and social problems in society in regard to issues where men are prejudiced against. I don't see how that's at odds with also wanting women to not be harmed by those issues. Simply because, on average, they're not harmed as much? Harm is bad. I'll empathize with the harmed regardless of whether the harm was likely or not.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:57 PM
0

That's what I've said the entire time with the exception that I can empathize with members of the better off group. Why? Because it's not their fault they're in the better off group.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:45 PM
0

Because treating an accused person of a crime, especially sex crimes, as though they were already convicted is considered a men's rights issue because men are usually the victims of such treatment. This is just another instance of that issue, but in this case, the accused happens to be a woman. The fact that it is posted here additionally shows that at least some MRAs are legitimate concerned about the issue, and not just concerned with stopping male rapists from being prosecuted, which is what …
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:32 PM
0

Why what? You mean what problem is it illustrating? That the accused, who in this case is also underaged, is having their personal information spread around before they have been convicted of anything.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:23 PM
0

In that case, you illiterate colostomy bag, I already addressed your question: Do you mean the content of the news story? It's not helping, obviously. It's illustrating that the problem exists.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:18 PM
1

WHAT. ARE. YOU. TALKING. ABOUT? WHAT. IS. "THIS." AND. "IT." IN. YOUR. SENTENCES, YOU. DENSE. MOTHER. FUCKER?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:10 PM
1

"Pardon" means "I don't know what you're talking about." What it "this"? Do you mean the content of the news story? It's not helping, obviously. It's illustrating that the problem exists. If you mean something else, I don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:16 PM
1

Pardon?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:53 AM
24

Because you don't improve society by making it worse for more people.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:25 PM
9

No, it doesn't. But the goal should obviously be to make the situation better for men, not worse for women.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:05 PM
8

The issue is about releasing her information before she is convicted, not whether it was rape, which it obviously was.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:58 PM
13

In order to protect the innocent, the law must also protect the guilty. Until convicted, the person has to be treated as innocent.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:56 PM
1

From the responses I've gotten, it may be genre-dependent. Most of the people who have disagreed with me have cited first-person shooters or the like. I tend to play turn-based strategy, J-RPGs and the like. Interestingly, in support of the OP's hypothesis, the games I play are less violent and have more female enemies, while the reverse is true of the people who have responded to me.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:14 PM
1

Not sure which games you're playing, but I see female baddies all the time.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 05:04 AM
1

You live above your boss? When was the last time you had a casual chat with your boss about you masturbating?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 07:22 AM
1

When was the last time you had a casual chat with your boss about you masturbating?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 06:47 AM
1

Taboo from discussion.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:56 AM
5

You monsters make me sick! You with your not-"consensual"-but-mutually-wished-for-and-enjoyed-by-both sex!
/r/MensRights30/01/12 04:35 AM
1

I'm not sure how having your teeth straitened is reversible, unless you mean by not wearing a retainer, which I believe most people who have braces don't need. Also, I doubt that anywhere near all braces are consented to by the children who have them. Anyway, like I said, this isn't my opinion; I was just pointing out the idea.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 07:41 PM
3

I've never picked up nor paid for a date. Just saiyan.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 10:19 AM
4

Yeah, her being female probably worsened the situation for the male contestant, but I think the primary factor in the incident was that she's the "star" of the show, and therefore by media standards, untouchable (not in the Indian sense, obviously).
/r/MensRights29/01/12 08:49 AM
1

From what I understand, having braces is quite unpleasant. (I never had them myself.) I suppose the argument goes that people might think they'd prefer straightened teeth because they are manipulated to by society just as people prefer being circumcised because they are manipulated into doing so by society.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 03:01 AM
-7

Unless you'd like to try your hand at constructing a valid argument and quit engaging in ad hominem attacks, this conversation is over.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 02:50 PM
2

Not my opinion, but I've heard the same argued about cosmetic orthodontic work.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 01:53 PM
-5

You haven't shown that women "control the vote." I do not accept your argument that simply because more women vote that they are in control of the outcome.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 01:42 PM
-6

Which of my assertions were unsupported? I hardly even made assertions. I merely pointed out in which ways your argument was not valid. it would still be women at fault here - not men That's what you seem to be trying to argue, and have yet to make the case for.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 01:06 PM
-10

More women vote than men women control the vote. That's really just a bad argument. It's both not valid and not relevant. Just because a group is the majority does not mean that it has greater political sway than other groups. Take right-handed people for example. Do righties "control the vote"? I think it's pretty silly to say so. And I don't see how women having more political sway would imply that there wasn't a sexist bias against female politicians. It's no surprise that women can be sexist…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 12:26 PM
-2

Pardon?
/r/MensRights27/01/12 11:29 AM
-7

No, they're making the right decision based on the presumption that they want to win. That doesn't mean there isn't a problem. It's not good if women are believed to be less electable than men. That belief alone makes it true. Strategic voting is a common problem in politics. This may well be one manifestation of the problem.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 11:23 AM
-5

Not exactly relevant when political parties have say in who runs.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 09:56 AM
10

What's with the "Bright side?" bit?
/r/MensRights26/01/12 06:57 AM
5

Aside from gay men being beaten to death being a common occurrence in the Middle East, there's this: "In Canada in 2008, police-reported data found that approximately 10% of all hate crimes in the country were motivated by sexual orientation. Of these, 56% were of a violent nature. In comparison, 38% of all racially motivated offenses were of a violent nature.[31] In the same year in the United States, according to Federal Bureau of Investigation data, though 4,704 crimes were committed due to r…
/r/MensRights03/01/12 06:11 PM
2

Source 1 Source 2
/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:45 PM
7

Would you rather be marginalized or beaten to death?
/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:43 PM
5

You can blame the Matriarchy for all women's problems. See how your statement can be reversed and be just as well-supported?
/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:41 PM
4

Or just incorrectly thinks the alternative to feminism is sexism, which many people incorrectly do through no mental deficiency of their own.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 03:01 PM
14

Troll harder, broseph.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 11:34 PM
-1

No, you're crazy because I didn't say any of the things you're arguing against and I don't hold any of the opinions you claim I do. But have fun; I'm sure you can continue my side of the conversation without my help.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 05:08 PM
-3

There would be no real point in refusing. Unless they don't want anyone to know for sure. Or don't want to give out DNA samples in general. the rest Well you sure took a turn for the crazy.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 04:06 PM
-3

If the children are adults they have the right to refuse to offer a DNA sample for testing.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 03:16 PM
-1

If the kids are adults, why should he? They have rights too.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 06:24 AM
7

France is the shithole of western Europe when it comes to human rights.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 12:59 AM
1

But what about those couples that have an open marriage? Are you suggesting that they not be allowed to set the terms of their own relationship? That would be a change in their contract. I don't disagree with your position, but I think your argument needs work.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 04:07 AM
1

To be fair, vasectomies aren't 100% effective.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 11:08 PM
9

It reduces sexual sensitivity which is a good thing!
/r/MensRights24/11/11 04:15 AM
1

Oh, I see. That's fair, though if it's the 90% that throws you off, I recommend you spend a few hours hanging out at the DMV.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 03:29 AM
4

False rape allegations and being forced into paternity, along with the gender-neutral problems of other forms of crazy and STDs.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 02:50 AM
10

Sorry, I was speaking from the perspective of a scientist, not from the perspective of someone trying to combat complete idiocy. The type of people who think women never abuse people are the type of people who I don't bother to engage in conversation with, so this data is of no use to me.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 01:43 AM
0

It doesn't negate it. It's just not that interesting by itself. It doesn't tell us much.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 09:16 PM
10

Because the top-voted comment explains why these numbers aren't meaningful by themselves.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 07:53 PM
4

The police are one thing, but the prosecutors aren't supposed to be punished in our legal system. In the US, we have an adversarial system. The prosecutors' job is not to seek the truth. Their job is to give the best reasons they can to commit the suspect, and if they aren't given more than one suspect by the police, they bring that suspect to the jury. The real problem here is that juries convict without being beyond a reasonable doubt, and we have nothing in place to make them.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 05:12 PM
3

All universities operate under massive financial support from the government. They're all essentially public institutions.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 12:46 AM
1

Smoked Jews and smoked cheese?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 09:42 PM
3

And that's not, how you use a comma.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 08:02 PM
6

Video.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 02:32 PM
3

I don't think a transperson should have to disclose that aspect of themselves to a suitor. If the other person wants to know, they should ask. The law is not made for your personal tastes and preferences, regardless of whether you are in the majority. If the transperson lies, then they're a douchbag, but it shouldn't be illegal above any general laws of "rape" by deception.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 08:07 AM
0

I don't know what I'm talking about, but having sex with a condom as agreed and then going against the agreement sounds like fraud to me.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 12:52 AM
1

Cain and Eve are both largely antagonists in the Bible I'm assuming you're Christian, since anyone reading the Bible from the outside would see Yahweh as the antagonist.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 09:11 PM
6

Dude, wtf? Yahweh fucking LOVES him some incest. Cain and Eve fuck. Lot's daughters fucked him. Sarah and Abraham are half-siblings. And cousins fuck throughout the whole fucking thing.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 05:24 AM
3

I actually think that it's a good tagline for the series, even though it would probably be misinterpreted by most viewers. I think the point they were trying to make (which I think is backed up by the image on the cover) is that women, not all women of course, but especially the show's metropolitan upper middle class women, make their lives more difficult by participating in fashion, particularly high fashion, and constant gossip about each other, and overanalyzing every decision everyone around…
/r/MensRights31/08/11 03:57 PM
6

it started feeling like pure objectification of male genitalia. I got pretty disgusted and just walked away. Haven't read that blog since. It and its sex-reversed counterpart wouldn't bother me. Sex positivism isn't exclusively feminist. It's a good thing as far as I'm concerned. I don't see anything wrong with saying how one enjoys body parts. It's true for most people, otherwise they wouldn't have sex, and it's just stigma to not talk about it. Objectification is only bad if you don't also see…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 04:51 PM
1

That's not how cheating works. Don't bother arguing with me, I've seen Seinfeld.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 05:15 AM
14

I subscribe to this subreddit pretty much just to see what people who are wrong think of people who are right.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:58 AM
4

I assumed she was joking around, but she JUST KEPT TALKING.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 07:36 AM
2

I agree, though if she was law enforcement, it is entrapment. Though it wasn't clear to me what she had to do with law enforcement when I read the first third of the article.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 07:35 PM
1

Okey, thanks. Thanks for the summary. Though I'm not sure what the women did which is illegal. I thought only law officials can commit entrapment.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 08:06 AM
1

Could someone summarize this article? After reading through the first third, I couldn't see how the DUI wasn't the guy's own fault.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 04:02 AM
3

I'm not saying it's true. I was hoping someone else might remember the story and where to find it. Looking up "Abu Ghraib" and "shit" on Google is not helpful.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 06:14 AM
1

I foggily recall hearing somewhere about a guy in Abu Ghraib who covered himself in shit because he was insane. I don't know if my memory is correct or if that was that guy, and it doesn't detract from the rest of the horrible abuse, but I'm not sure if that picture was of abuse.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 02:58 AM
9

Hey! Don't tell me what I should or shouldn't masturbate to!
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:51 PM
2

It does seem that way in this case, though to be fair, when I confronted her on it, she said that she "moreso" meant that men are more likely to be perceived as sexist in this context than other groups.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:37 PM
3

I crossposted it to r/feminism, btw. Link: http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/iu4z6/do_you_see_the_sexism_here/
/r/MensRights19/07/11 10:02 PM
0

I wanted to have sex with her, and did, but I later found out she likes Nickelback. I was deceived! Just a matter of degree.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 06:31 AM
7

All glory to the FAQ~
/r/MensRights18/07/11 06:29 AM
-1

In other words, it isn’t that “10% of all rapes are reported and of those 6% end in conviction” (so 0.6% of all rapes end in conviction), it’s that “10% of all rapes are reported and 6% of all rapes end in conviction” — i.e., that 6%/10% = 60% of all reported rapes end in conviction. This is two orders of magnitude higher than the misconception trope. For an article talking about innumeracy, this is pretty ironic. It's only one order of magnitude off. EDIT: Oh, nevermind. I misread what he was s…
/r/MensRights11/07/11 02:59 PM
1

I don't define feminism by its most prominent proponents just like I don't define democracy by its most prominent proponents. People are stupid, and sully the ideas they try to support by bringing their own biases into their actions. I generally see feminism as being the goal of sexual/gender equality with a focus on giving women the rights men have, and I see men's rights as being the goal of sexual/gender equality with focus on giving men the rights women have. In most cases, those two are not…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 12:43 AM
2

You must be using very different definitions than I. Care to explain?
/r/MensRights29/06/11 12:16 AM
-8

I think it's great. Unlike some people, I have no problem being a feminist and an MRA.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 04:12 AM
1

You sure you're not thesemanticsguy?
/r/MensRights24/06/11 03:01 AM
1

Uh... no... That was not my point. My point was that I do not treat "ladies" a special way. I treat female humans like I treat everyone else who qualifies as human.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 02:23 AM
16

"Oh my! That man has legs! Oh, and I bet he has a penis to go with them! A rape penis!"
/r/MensRights24/06/11 12:07 AM
1

"I will only treat you like a lady so long as you don't have the right to vote or work in certain jobs." That's right. Otherwise, I'll treat you like a human fucking being.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 11:10 PM
5

I need to do more yoga.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 10:35 AM
2

My balls aren't in my mouth, so it's fine.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 05:42 AM
1

With gusto!
/r/MensRights22/06/11 05:12 AM
30

Most people obviously don't want genuine equality, they just want what is best for themselves. FTFY. Feel free to ejaculate the downvotes directly into my mouth, sirs.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 04:44 AM
-1

I'm pro-abortion, but only where it is required by the Zeroth Law.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 07:51 AM
1

I hate you for liking the things you like! DOWNVOTE!!! (secret upvote)
/r/MensRights20/06/11 03:56 PM
1

My first thought as well.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 03:53 PM
9

Regendered for you: http://imgur.com/Ue0Z8
/r/MensRights20/06/11 03:47 PM
1

The annoy-you-into-feeling-safer police?
/r/MensRights15/06/11 04:27 PM
6

There are clothing restrictions in the west too. For both sexes. Nudists are punished by law enforcement in most countries.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 05:59 AM
9

Amazing.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 12:34 PM
-3

How is this a violation of her privacy? None of her information is on the billboard.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 10:38 AM
1

For some reason, I ain't even mad.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 06:43 AM
2

She's obviously a bitch, but I don't see why she would be convicted of anything, regardless of her sex.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 03:37 PM
1

I've definitely had that happen.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 02:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter