TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GiveBackMyRidgedBand Archive

View 1 posts and 188 comments by GiveBackMyRidgedBand on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

IntactivismGiveBackMyRidgedBand/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:47 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

People lie, even to themselves to be convinced that their penis is not damaged. That’s how surveys are not good enough for me. So please convince me to have my cut son. Provide evidence that there isn’t a single Meissner or genital corpuscle in the foreskin.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 12:57 AM
5

How did they measure levels sexual pleasure? 🤔 Please, tell me…or better yet, let’s stop cutting baby boys, and we don’t have to wonder if we cut any sexually responsive tissue. Better yet, provide evidence that no sexually responsive tissue is being cut off during circumcision. And please, don’t retort to cut guys can still orgasm…
/r/MensRights16/12/23 12:52 AM
7

It’s a claim backed by studies, which are more solid than mere surveys done in Africa. Not everyone is happy with their adult circumcisions.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 12:41 AM
35

Mutilation: “deprivation of a necessary or important part” Definition checks out. The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. I would consider it an important part.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 05:52 PM
41

I’m glad penis reduction is good for you, but it’s not good for all.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 05:43 PM
1

I’ve seen cases where even part of the upper leg is affected.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 06:19 AM
8

This is the real reason circumcision is mandated by certain Abrahamic religions. To make more religious followers.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 02:23 AM
3

Fournier’s gangrene happens in the scrotum, and circumcision is the least of your worries. Skin grafts etc. will be needed
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:22 PM
5

Medicaid pays for circumcision with or without spina bífida in over 30 states… that’s a waste of money.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:17 PM
9

Countries that circumcise infants always find reasons to do it…I would check how other countries do it.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 02:33 PM
6

I specified if there is no condition needing it. And circumcision is only needed in cases of r/BXO that doesn’t respond to medication.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 01:23 PM
11

You’re the one that started with the UTI scaremongering
/r/MensRights13/12/23 01:16 PM
50

Male circumcision is not therapeutic if there is no condition needing it.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:55 AM
7

The equivalent would be cutting the most sensitive part of the female genitalia would be to cut the most sensitive part of the male genitalia. The most sensitive part of the penis is the foreskin
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 02:57 PM
25

The violent one didn’t get violent when FGM was banned though… 🤔
/r/MensRights06/12/23 12:13 AM
25

The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis.. Loss of foreskin is a serious complication from a procedure that cured or fixed absolutely nothing.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 12:11 AM
22

Not all men are happy with the results. I don’t know why you speak for everyone https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/qibi6z/intact_men_of_reddit_if_you_had_to_estimate_how/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf https://www.reddit.com/r/EdgingTalk/comments/r1md9c/uncut_guys_are_cut_guys_missing_out/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf https://www.reddit.com/r/foreskin_restoration/comments/whcdrt/guys_who_got_circumcised_as_teenagers_or_adults/?utm_source=share…
/r/MensRights06/12/23 12:09 AM
2

Free version https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140673607603122
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:31 PM
2

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(07)60312-2/fulltext https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140673607603122
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:30 PM
4

This is the study that launched the programs for the useless mutilation of African men https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(07)60312-2/fulltext Edit: Free version https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140673607603122 These are studies reporting that said programs are not yielding the results expected: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science/article/abs/changing-relationships-between-hiv-prevalence-and-circumcision-in-lesot…
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:29 PM
1

That’s why guys like me try to be present in ALL circumcision threads :)
/r/MensRights11/11/23 11:58 PM
2

Maybe if you cut some more off, they’ll like it more. Meet feroxfeminae, she’ll mold you into her perfect dildo
/r/MensRights11/11/23 11:56 PM
2

If the culture is that he'll be ashamed and embarrassed for not being circumcised, then do him a solid and get him circumcised. No. We should stop mutilating penises and the culture change will follow.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 11:33 PM
1

How do you know you wouldn’t be happier uncircumcised?
/r/MensRights11/11/23 08:36 PM
0

Was it your decision?
/r/MensRights11/11/23 08:33 PM
3

There’s no reason to think you would’ve done it as an adult. And it’s not better to have parts of your penis cut off.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:32 PM
1

Do you even know the difference?
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:29 PM
3

You can’t really say something is integral (complete) after you take a piece off.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:28 PM
3

She’s not going to make him into the guys with the mutilated penis. Sorry mutilated guys.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:47 PM
2

Not according to science
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:44 PM
1

I’m hoping it’ll set a legal precedent
/r/MensRights04/11/23 05:37 PM
1

Thanks for clarifying that. A pro-circ guy just told OP to stop chiming in…that this is a men’s sub. I guess her views don’t align with his.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 01:36 PM
3

Well…the last time a girl was genitally mutilated in the US, was done by a doctor in sterile conditions (2017, Michigan) and it doesn’t make it ok.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 01:31 PM
4

I’m sure we could find a lot of Muslim men prefer circumcised women, too.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 04:27 AM
1

My views on female circumcision have always been welcomed by Western women.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 04:26 AM
5

Here’s a boy being circumcised. Not by a doctor, not in sterile conditions. Most circumcisions are carried out by Muslims… https://www.reddit.com/r/exmuslim/comments/hll3lr/disturbing_a_child_just_at_the_cusp_of_his_years/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/MensRights20/10/23 04:25 AM
4

Circumcision is not a well established medical procedure to help provide better long term health for men. If it was well established, it would be taken seriously by more developed countries…however it is only taken seriously in two: Israel and the US. Other countries’ medical organizations have issued starlike this one by the Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) (2010): “there is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessary in terms of prevention or hygiene.” Nobody is being…
/r/MensRights20/10/23 03:12 AM
1

I remain unconvinced. Should I expect to see you telling every single non-male you come across the sub to stop weighing in on male issues?
/r/MensRights19/10/23 04:41 PM
1

I don’t think so. If she supported your views on circumcision you probably wouldn’t have mentioned how women should stay out of it.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 04:09 PM
2

It’s not a pain in the ass to clean. It takes 5 seconds. Now brushing and flossing your teeth, that’s a pain, but we still do it.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:03 PM
1

Anyone can weigh in on genital mutilation of males or females.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:01 PM
2

Most males that are anti-circumcision are circumcised themselves.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 02:52 PM
4

I think the response most people in the West get when female genital mutilation is mention is pretty radical. OP and myself wish the same response to male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 02:51 PM
3

I don’t think so. A very small minority of men develop an obsessive paraphilia for cutting off their foreskin. They call themselves circumsexuals. The chance that you would’ve become one (if you hadn’t been circumcised at birth) is minimal.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 02:50 PM
2

Here’s an illustration of the loss we suffered https://reddit.com/u/GiveBackMyRidgedBand/s/co6Uxg6Mn6
/r/MensRights19/10/23 02:46 PM
4

The only developed countries where those supposed benefits are taken for fact are the US and Israel. Cutting healthy body parts off children doesn’t make them healthier.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 02:44 PM
3

Radical ≠ terrorist
/r/MensRights19/10/23 02:41 PM
2

Research by Cambridge University reports that circumcision is not yielding the expected HIV mitigation results… https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science/article/abs/changing-relationships-between-hiv-prevalence-and-circumcision-in-lesotho/68635CF47DD0910636C406F82D623188 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science/article/abs/ageincidence-and-prevalence-of-hiv-among-intact-and-circumcised-men-an-analysis-of-phia-surveys-in-southern-africa/CAA7…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 02:35 PM
2

This image would’ve radicalized me…if I wasn’t already https://reddit.com/u/GiveBackMyRidgedBand/s/co6Uxg6Mn6
/r/MensRights18/10/23 08:46 PM
2

r/foreskin_restoration
/r/MensRights02/10/23 05:49 PM
1

Those that oppose the banning of MGM know that once it’s considered child abuse in one place, it’ll snowball from there.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 05:47 PM
2

They’re compensating for their loss.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:13 PM
4

So is cutting any other part of your body off
/r/AllPillDebate30/09/23 02:57 AM
1

Circumcision ablates the most sensitive part of the penis
/r/MensRights22/09/23 02:53 AM
1

Yeah, and it’s Galatians 5:2
/r/MensRights22/09/23 02:51 AM
2

If a girl is cold with you, why stay with her?
/r/MensRights22/09/23 02:50 AM
0

Sorry for not specifying. I’m Mexican btw, in Mexico they’re separate as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 09:54 PM
6

You mean in the boy & Girl Scouts. They’ve been accepting girls for a few years now. https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/us/boy-scouts-girls-trnd/index.html
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 09:16 PM
12

Any men’s support network will be deemed sexist for catering to men. Example: There are no more Boy Scouts, because it is now Boy & Girl Scouts…there is however an exclusive Girl Scouts. Edit. If I was a beautiful feminist woman, I’d become a powerful (married) man’s lover have his child and extortion him for the rest of his life, to do my feminist bidding. Maybe it happens more than we’d like.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 08:17 PM
3

Not Christians
/r/MensRights30/07/23 06:12 PM
3

FGM in all forms is way worse FGM Type 1a is clitoral hood excision FGM Type 4 can be just a scrape or pin prick How are these two types worse than circumcision?
/r/MensRights30/07/23 06:10 PM
2

It removes erogenous spots. Don’t believe me? Try finding the ridged band.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 06:08 PM
7

He’s probably dealing with feelings of disgust at circumcision being portrayed as something negative. He’s probably circumcised and wants those feelings away as fast as possible. It’s a very emotional reaction right there.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 09:18 AM
2

“Circumcision ablates the most sensitive part of the penis” Sorrells (2007) It removes: Ridged band “Rich in Meissner's corpuscles,the area is usually described as highly erogenous.” Frenular delta “This area, especially the frenulum itself, is reported to be the most sensitive area of the penis” Frenulum of the prepuce “Along with the ridged bands at the tip of the, it i eme and an tts considered to be the most sensitive part of the penis to fine-touch.”
/r/MensRights21/07/23 03:44 PM
2

All circumcised men have scars. If I had my ridged band, frenular delta and frenulum I would use them. I don’t know how you try to justify what was done to us, after the info I’ve given you.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 03:43 AM
3

Why would you even think I’m jealous? Cosmetic surgeries on newborns are cringe. Not everyone prefers the look of a cut dick. At least, I don’t like the scars on mine. Cut any other healthy body part off a newborn and it would be considered abuse. You’ve just normalized cutting the foreskin, which as I’ve mentioned, is detrimental to our sexuality.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 07:46 PM
2

Those spots that were cut off, are also stimulated during sex. Anyway, it’s not about you, is it? It’s about stopping defending and continuing the practice.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 06:01 PM
5

Glad you asked. You can read and you can watch. Your choice. http://can-fap.net/preview/fundraiser_preview_fremgasm.shtml http://can-fap.net/preview/fundraiser_preview_fremgasmMCJ.shtml http://can-fap.net/preview/fundraiser_preview_fremgasmlengthwise.shtml http://can-fap.net/preview/fundraiser_preview_multipleforegasm.shtml
/r/MensRights20/07/23 03:39 PM
9

The bias is hanging between your legs. Get over yourself. Stop defending those that abused your right to an integral body.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 01:47 PM
10

There are always defenders of men’s rights abusers in these threads. Just because it happened to you doesn’t mean it wasn’t bad. I get that you’re not aware what you lost, but… “Circumcision ablates the most sensitive part of the penis.” Sorrells (2007)
/r/MensRights20/07/23 01:46 PM
9

This is what he means https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10554847/Is-NHS-carrying-thousands-unnecessary-circumcisions-teenage-boys.html
/r/MensRights20/07/23 01:41 PM
5

It’s a blatant abuse of power
/r/MensRights15/07/23 06:42 PM
19

This meme might shed some light on the issue. If a country were to ban the practice, it would send the message: because it’s bad, because it’s child abuse. So religious group goes to great lengths to leverage the US’s power to keep the practice legal everywhere.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 03:16 PM
4

Let’s name them: Abraham Wolbarst Abraham Ravich Aaron Fink Thomas Wiswell Edgar Schoen Daniel Halperin Stephen Moses Andrew Friedman
/r/MensRights23/06/23 06:06 PM
3

Mmmm…if you’re not a Jew or a Muslim the attribute that most correlates with being pro-circumcision is being American. I mean you’ll find American Atheists supporting the practice.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 12:36 AM
3

Designed to strip you off your dignity and your foreskin.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 10:29 PM
5

If you ever stumble across a thread about circumcision you’ll find plenty of humiliating comments about intact penises. With words like weird, gross, abnormal, etc. and no shortage of 🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮. While the humiliation of cut guys is mostly reserved to the subreddit you found, humiliation of intact men can happen everywhere, in real life and even on tv
/r/MensRights15/06/23 12:27 PM
2

Yeah, because circumcised guys can’t possibly have negative feelings about losing the most sensitive part of their penis, right?
/r/MensRights14/06/23 08:18 PM
4

I would’ve never chosen to have these pled pots removed: Ridged band “Rich in Meissner's corpuscles,the area is usually described as highly erogenous.” Frenular delta “This area, especially the frenulum itself, is reported to be the most sensitive area of the penis” Frenulum of the prepuce “Along with the ridged bands at the tip of the, it i eme and an s considered to be the most sensitive part of the penis to fine-touch.”
/r/MensRights14/06/23 01:42 AM
1

Most males like sex, and sex is pointless without physical pleasure
/r/MensRights18/05/23 05:14 PM
1

15 square inches (when it grows into adulthood) is not little. It also happens to have the most erogenous spots on the penis.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 05:12 PM
9

You don’t want it to be a bad thing, but it is. Removing these erogenous spots would’ve never been a sane man’s choice: Ridged band “Rich in Meissner's corpuscles,the area is usually described as highly erogenous.” Frenular delta “This area, especially the frenulum itself, is reported to be the most sensitive area of the penis” Frenulum of the prepuce “Along with the ridged bands at the tip of the, it i eme and an s considered to be the most sensitive part of the penis to fine-touch.”
/r/MensRights18/05/23 03:35 AM
1

Not really, not in most cases. And by that, I mean over 95% of them. Plus, the loss is just not worth it: the most pleasurable parts are on the foreskin.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 01:46 AM
1

My son will keep his whole penis. All the benefits you talk about can be had with good hygiene and safe sex. I guess we have different values: pleasure is important to me.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 02:37 PM
1

What are the cons of not having a foreskin?
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:56 PM
2

Removing the most pleasurable part of the penis is not the best thing for a male.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:55 PM
3

Cosmetic surgery that happens to remove the most sensitive parts of the penis. Not for not son.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:53 PM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:52 PM
7

Why?
/r/MensRights16/05/23 06:24 PM
5

This is a short one with a lot of info: https://youtu.be/Ceht-3xu84I
/r/MensRights25/04/23 03:32 PM
10

Yes
/r/MensRights24/04/23 04:33 PM
3

Paretto’s law seems to be at work. 80% of women are fucking 20% of the men…maybe
/r/MensRights19/04/23 08:55 PM
29

Apparently, we have to die for perpetrators to get some consequences.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:39 PM
2

Just google “foreskin fibroblast sale”
/r/MensRights17/02/23 03:42 AM
1

No circumcision is prescribed in the Koran
/r/MensRights15/02/23 11:08 AM
2

I don’t think so. Their beloved female mutilation procedure is already illegal…they just keep on doing it, discreetly.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 09:19 PM
1

This was an anti-Indian move https://www.reddit.com/r/HistoryPorn/comments/2uv1rl/a_pakistani_soldier_examines_whether_a_man_is/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/MensRights14/02/23 05:08 PM
3

Here it is again: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/search/human-foreskin-fibroblast?focus=products&page=1&perpage=30&sort=relevance&term=human%20foreskin%20fibroblast&type=product_name https://www.lifelinecelltech.com/shop/cells/fibroblasts/dermal-fibroblasts/human-dermal-fibroblasts-neonatal-fc-0001/ https://www.emdmillipore.com/US/en/product/FibroGRO-Xeno-Free-Human-Foreskin-Fibroblasts,MM_NF-SCC058 https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/C0045C
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:34 PM
1

No, we’re not lucky. I wish I could do this: https://www.reddit.com/r/EdgingTalk/comments/q001ww/uncut_edging_guide_ridged_band_stimulation/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/MensRights15/01/23 01:42 AM
2

Yes, the remaining erogenous parts of the penis still feel good. But the most sensitive parts were taken away. It has to be said so that we stop doing it.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 01:40 AM
4

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8800902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/joa.13481
/r/MensRights07/01/23 04:24 AM
6

Basic science vs. clinical trial samples are different
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:39 AM
6

How can we create awareness if we don’t mention the negative side of the procedure? How can we say it’s bad, without making you feel bad about it? I’m circumcised too, we need to get our egos out of the way so that the people that did it to us, stop doing it to others.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:33 AM
6

And that’s something to be very calm about
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:27 AM
4

There’s a subreddit for your fetish
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:26 AM
3

There are studies that determined that the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:23 AM
6

Roofied people can’t either. Does that allow you to do whatever you want to them?
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:19 AM
8

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8800902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/joa.13481
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:18 AM
10

That’s what we’re led to believe. The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis, you can’t remove that and not affect how sex/masturbation feels.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:12 AM
5

Google Metzitzah b’peh
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:53 AM
5

Most late-in-life circumcisions are unnecessary. There are less costly and less invasive options.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 12:43 PM
13

Finally, this is going to stop happening: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10554847/Is-NHS-carrying-thousands-unnecessary-circumcisions-teenage-boys.html
/r/MensRights10/11/22 12:35 PM
1

He’s not wrong.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:11 PM
5

It really can’t be measured. But check these things circumcised guys can’t ever do: NSFW https://www.reddit.com/r/EdgingTalk/comments/q001ww/uncut_edging_guide_ridged_band_stimulation/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf http://can-fap.net/preview/fundraiser_preview_multipleforegasm.shtml
/r/MensRights14/10/22 04:10 AM
2

Lol. Erogenous tissue remains erogenous tissue, it doesn’t matter how you stimulate it.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:11 PM
3

What I’m trying to tell you is that the foreskin is sexually responsive, just like the glans. Cutting sexually responsive or erogenous tissue is not a good idea.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 06:14 PM
6

No need to have sex. They can just rub it, like this: https://www.reddit.com/r/EdgingTalk/comments/q001ww/uncut_edging_guide_ridged_band_stimulation/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/MensRights24/09/22 03:06 PM
3

100% pleasure. It’s there for pleasure.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:25 PM
1

It’s rape with an object
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:17 PM
2

It should be as optional as cutting any other part of the body
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:14 PM
6

Some doctors enjoying it and finding it sexually gratifying leads to lots of unnecessary circumcisions. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10554847/Is-NHS-carrying-thousands-unnecessary-circumcisions-teenage-boys.html
/r/MensRights10/09/22 03:46 PM
7

Fourteenth ammendment: No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The last bit is the most important for this issue.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 12:13 PM
8

Circumcision removes: Ridged band “Rich in Meissner's corpuscles,the area is usually described as highly erogenous.” Frenular delta “This area, especially the frenulum itself, is reported to be the most sensitive area of the penis” Frenulum of the prepuce “Along with the ridged bands at the tip of the, it is considered to be the most sensitive part of the penis to fine-touch.” Pretty sure most of us would’ve like to keep parts of our penis with descriptors like these.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 12:09 PM
3

There is nothing medical about the removal of a body part without a therapeutic purpose
/r/MensRights10/09/22 12:01 PM
2

MGM is rape
/r/MensRights10/09/22 11:40 AM
5

there’s no sexual intentions on the part of the perpetrators Some think there might be: https://www.reddit.com/r/circumsexual/comments/txvbe3/how_would_you_feel_if_the_doctor_who_performed/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/MensRights10/09/22 11:39 AM
5

It’s not based on beliefs. It’s based on the knowledge that the foreskin is erogenous tissue.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 11:37 AM
6

No. It means the removal of erogenous tissue for no good reason from someone that would’ve said no if he was grown up.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 11:32 AM
6

Wrong. Circumcision cuts off these: Ridged band “Rich in Meissner's corpuscles,the area is usually described as highly erogenous.” Frenular delta “This area, especially the frenulum itself, is reported to be the most sensitive area of the penis” Frenulum of the prepuce “Along with the ridged bands at the tip of the, it is considered to be the most sensitive part of the penis to fine-touch.”
/r/MensRights13/08/22 04:30 PM
11

Sounds like there needs to be a website for men to publish their false accusations.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 01:05 PM
2

We do care. Even the most selfish of us have to recognize there are instances in which it can affect men.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 12:51 AM
1

A little…over-represented, huh?
/r/MensRights23/07/22 02:10 AM
7

The foreskin exists mostly for pleasure and has more functions than the clitoris. It’s also the most sensitive part of the penis.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 02:08 AM
5

Go control the conversation some place else, perhaps r/lostredditors?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:46 PM
3

The clitoris is much bigger than what we see. It has an internal structure that divides in an inverted “Y” shape that run alongside the vaginal walls. FGM type 3 is much worse, though. It removes clitoris, labia and shuts the vaginal open close with stitches. It happens mostly in Somalia and is only about 10% of FGM cases.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:34 PM
7

https://www.reddit.com/user/GiveBackMyRidgedBand/comments/vqo4ix/a_map_of_the_most_sensitive_parts_of_the_penis/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8800902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/joa.13481
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:26 PM
5

Most female mutilators and advocates are women: https://youtu.be/0vI_4PZTkME Not “men controlling women’s bodies.” Stop projecting. This post looks like women are training to control males’ bodies: https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivism/comments/uhf9jb/despite_what_feminists_insist_about_men_being/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:08 PM
4

Like this? Never, ever, ever? https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/04/female-genital-mutilation-cutting-anthropologist/389640/
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:04 PM
10

Most cases of FGM are much less harmful than male circumcision. The most common type 1a only removes the clitoral hood, which is tiny compared to the foreskin. Also, the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:57 PM
5

The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. Removing it is a bad idea. It has these features: Ridged band “Rich in Meissner's corpuscles,the area is usually described as highly erogenous.” Frenular delta “This area, especially the frenulum itself, is reported to be the most sensitive area of the penis” Frenulum of the prepuce “Along with the ridged bands at the tip of the foreskin, it is considered to be the most sensitive part of the penis to fine-touch.”
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:54 PM
12

Women can and do have orgasms from sex after the external part of the clitoris is removed. What they can’t do is masturbate with the external part of the clitoris. Same as us, once circumcised we don’t have access to ridged band, frenular delta, and depending on how vicious the circumciser is, the frenulum. I don’t have any of these parts.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:06 PM
3

It’s not just the meaty picture. That edging guide does sound like we’re missing out.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 12:27 PM
21

It’s a lifetime of knowing you’re missing out on a normal sex life.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 03:59 AM
1

Yeah, but I know I can’t do this: https://www.reddit.com/r/EdgingTalk/comments/q001ww/uncut_edging_guide_ridged_band_stimulation/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/MensRights07/07/22 02:45 AM
2

I’m just stating the stupidity of the argument. People are not aware of the “minor” complications like meatal stenosis, skin dehiscence, uneven scar, delayed ejaculation, skin bridges, etc.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 02:44 AM
1

That’s Pro-Circumcision 101 given by prof. Brian Morris room 666
/r/MensRights07/07/22 02:41 AM
1

I just provided evidence that circumcision does have a big effect.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 09:22 PM
7

The whole argument for promoting circumcision is: “if you cut it, it will not get sick.” While it may be true, few people would be willing to follow that advice once they know they’re able to experience something like this: NSFW https://www.reddit.com/r/EdgingTalk/comments/q001ww/uncut_edging_guide_ridged_band_stimulation/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/MensRights06/07/22 09:21 PM
1

Unfortunately.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:55 PM
3

Gynoralization. Used like so: all women are gynoralize about everything.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:48 PM
1

All kinds of evidence there. Pick your poison. Plus, this is not a medical journal, it’s reddit. First 5 are peer reviewed, if you’re picky.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:23 PM
2

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8800902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/joa.13481 Ridged band “Rich in Meissner's corpuscles,the area is usually described as highly erogenous.” Frenular delta “This area, especially the frenulum itself, is reported to be the most sensitive area of the penis” Frenulum of the prepuce “Along with the ridged bands at the t…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 04:02 AM
1

I realize it’s pretty bad to remove the most sensitive part of the penis.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:31 AM
2

Have you seen what pleasure guys can have with theirs?
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:29 AM
1

The point is to be aware. Stop normalizing it. Stop inflicting it on the next generations. I know it sucks that it’s too late fir us.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:28 AM
2

Can circumcised men do this? NSFW http://can-fap.net/preview/fundraiser_preview_fremgasm.shtml http://can-fap.net/preview/fundraiser_preview_fremgasmMCJ.shtml http://can-fap.net/preview/fundraiser_preview_fremgasmlengthwise.shtml http://can-fap.net/preview/fundraiser_preview_multipleforegasm.shtml
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:21 AM
2

1-. When you say all people that want to ban it are bigots, you are attempting to censor us. 2-. Good luck convincing anyone that forcing an infant to eat is in the same category as cutting of body parts for no good reason at all. 3-. I can assure you there is much more sexualization of minors on the pro-circumcision side. The only thing intactivists are advocating fir is to do nothing to infants genitals if there is no good reason to.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:16 AM
0

There is no medical body that opposes vaccines. Their effectiveness has been proven. Circumcision is not supported for preventive reasons anywhere but the US, and many medical bodies from developed countries have in fact opposed the AAPs policy. If it was so good, and had no side effects it would be done in the whole world. Instead, most circumcisions are performed for religious reasons by both Muslims and Jews. It’s time Americans open their eyes and stop being duped by religious -bias-fueled s…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:25 AM
3

Removing the foreskin isn’t bad enough?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:28 PM
2

Huge downside: foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:19 PM
6

Define “sexual function”
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:19 PM
5

Define “sexual function”
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:18 PM
1

Right? It just makes sense!
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:47 AM
9

Well, I am missing these parts: Ridged band “Rich in Meissner's corpuscles,the area is usually described as highly erogenous.” Frenular delta “This area, especially the frenulum itself, is reported to be the most sensitive area of the penis” Frenulum of the prepuce “Along with the ridged bands at the tip of the foreskin, it is considered to be the most sensitive part of the penis to fine-touch.”
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:29 AM
6

I would’ve rather been aborted than circumcised. No lasting effects.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:10 AM
3

No, they are not. You can’t feel with the parts that were cut off, can you?
/r/MensRights04/07/22 12:03 PM
4

Circumcision is not a left or right problem. There are victims and promoters on both sides.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 12:02 PM
13

Well put. But I would add that anyone wanting yo cut off healthy erogenous tissue needs a psychiatric evaluation before getting the green light to do it.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 03:33 PM
13

You have a say in your son’s
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:41 AM
8

I wouldn’t call them complications, they’re morbidities, and happen in about .5% of intact guys. Now what are the complications from circumcision? Well, one seemingly unintended one, is that it removes the most pleasurable part of the penis (the foreskin), and there are complications that cause damage beyond intended.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:26 AM
1

Let’s see how you like this one: https://youtu.be/FFiZVIoj5jQ And this one: https://youtu.be/hlrEL7SVhnI Edit: this one is a good way of describing how I felt for a good part of 2021, related to circumcision.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 02:31 PM
3

Some compare it to watching TV in the latest model vs. watching TV in a black and white 1940s tube TV. Or hearing a symphony with parts of the orchestra missing. You’re doing great. Most guys get really defensive…a pretty normal response too, I guess. I found out 15 years ago through this webpage: http://www.norm.org/lost.html
/r/MensRights16/05/22 12:33 PM
3

So, can you still feel with the parts that were cut off?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:41 AM
2

It’s the original lies. Eric Clopper listed the liars, I bother to look for their articles.
/r/Male_Studies09/05/22 10:58 PM
3

It’s not worth it. They’re all lies.
/r/Male_Studies09/05/22 10:38 PM
3

From the article: “Surgical fees for the five-minute operation range between $50 and $125, leading some critics to suggest that the profit motive has been the most important factor sustaining circumcision. Yet, for those predisposed to circumcise, there has been just enough scientific evidence to make it seem reasonable. After 1900 the demise of reflex theory did not invalidate circumcision, but opened the door for other theories.” And here they are: Abraham Wolbarst - penile cancer https://ia60…
/r/Male_Studies09/05/22 09:45 PM
31

Of course, removing the most erogenous part on the penis is ok, anything else is child abuse.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 06:45 PM
3

But it was cut off during circumcision https://www.reddit.com/r/IntactivistMemes/comments/tb3cy9/denial_and_ignorance_with_bad_results/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/MensRights06/05/22 08:05 PM
3

Your opinion encourages parents to cut their baby boys, instead of giving them the choice you enjoyed.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 05:35 PM
2

Can you still stimulate your ridged band to orgasm?
/r/MensRights06/05/22 05:27 PM
5

That’s how you know he’s circumcised and refusing to accept that circumcision is worse than the type of FGM the woman is advocating for.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 03:06 PM
7

Definitely. This is what’s coming: https://youtu.be/ob3Wf0PKtBM
/r/MensRights05/05/22 08:30 PM
6

I think the first step is changing the public’s view of the foreskin. As long as the public continually regards it as just skin, instead of highly erogenous sensory tissue, there will be no lawsuits won or real change towards outlawing the practice.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 05:59 PM
6

Just like they mutilate girls in Malaysia and Indonesia, at the hospital, as newborns so they don’t remember.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:27 PM
7

Loss of highly erogenous tissue.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:22 PM
9

Can you still reach orgasm by stimulating your ridged band?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:21 PM
8

Loss of erogenous tissue
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:16 PM
14

You still have bacteria in your penis. What you don’t have is all the nerve endings that were located in the foreskin.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter