TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Gjaukulf407 Archive

View 9 posts and 112 comments by Gjaukulf407 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
450

ProgressGjaukulf407/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:12 AM
94

ProgressGjaukulf407/r/MensRights19/11/22 10:56 PM
71

Social IssuesGjaukulf407/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:06 PM
64

Social IssuesGjaukulf407/r/MensRights10/12/22 01:54 PM
52

Social IssuesGjaukulf407/r/MensRights11/06/21 10:49 AM
1

ProgressGjaukulf407/r/MensRights20/03/23 07:31 PM
1

Social IssuesGjaukulf407/r/MensRights10/12/22 01:50 PM
1

Social IssuesGjaukulf407/r/MensRights10/06/21 05:48 AM
1

Social IssuesGjaukulf407/r/MensRights10/12/22 01:48 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Chapter 6, The impact of imprisonment on women, Point 127: "Alternatively, if a prison sentence is necessary, strong personal mitigation or a realistic prospect of rehabilitation might suggest it is appropriate to suspend the sentence." I think that's what HeatScissors003 might have been referring to.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 12:53 AM
11

What really makes people who try to defend Aileen Wurnos look stupid even further is the fact that she eventually admitted herself that her "self defence" defence was bogus. She found God in prison and felt she had to confess, so in one of her last interviews she made it 100% clear that she had not killed in self defence. She admitted in front of a camera to having murdered seven men in the first degree with intent to rob them. The interview is literally on YouTube for anybody and everybody to w…
/r/MensRights21/10/23 10:06 PM
23

And when the media reports on it 95% of the time the female teacher didn't even rape the student, she "had sex" with him. Media acting like that isn't the most disgustingly wrong way of putting it.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 08:53 AM
14

Relating to the TikTok video in the article: What's it like to live in a world preprogrammed for your success? Women and girls are now performing better than boys and men in at every level of education, yet it's women who has the majority of gender specific scholarships. Also, a LinkedIn study found that: "Women are actually 16 percent more likely than men to get hired after applying for a job and are 18 percent more likely than men to get hired after applying to more senior roles, according to …
/r/MensRights07/10/23 10:30 AM
13

Hating feminism is not the same as hating women, we certainly don't hate women.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 11:00 PM
16

Go on TheTinMen's Instagram, pick 5 random posts and read them. That'll give you a few of the dozens of reasons as to why this sub exists.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 10:58 PM
3

installed on your brain Your grammar is as good as your arguments.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 10:11 PM
19

Every word you just wrote is more incorrect than the one before it.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 05:10 PM
1

Nobody said that it did.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:15 AM
8

Nothing makes a woman's life more valuable, because it isn't. Men and women are biologically dependent on each other. Like you said, they should be valued equally.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 07:38 AM
3

Merriam-Webster: Racism: a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race. also : behavior or attitudes that reflect and foster this belief : racial discrimination or prejudice Sexism: prejudice or discrimination based on sex especially : discrimination against women behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex ​ Oxford dictionary: Racism: The …
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:27 AM
2

It's clear that you don't know what racism or sexism is.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:13 AM
2

I have a dislike extension on, and that short has a ratio of 73k likes to 332k dislikes. That makes me happy.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 11:47 PM
3

I couldn't give less of a shit about the sexuality of those vile evil creatures. I barely noticed the fact that they were lesbians, all my attention and anger was focused on the fact that they were released after serving 5% of their sentences for their inhumane treatment of that poor innocent boy. My point still stands though. If you wanna get anything across, introducing your argument with "Hey dipshits" is just about worst thing you can do.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 05:05 PM
12

You completely missed the point of this post, and if you wanna get anything across at all, starting your comment with "Hey dipshits" is a very unproductive way of doing so.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 06:39 AM
6

Trying to flee when your country is attacked is a bitch move. Trying to flee an active warzone is not a bitch move, it's called survivor instinct, and all humans are born with it. If you think of it's a bitch move then that also goes for women right? So when women were fleeing Ukraine at the start of the conflict they were all making bitch moves?
/r/MensRights05/06/23 10:28 AM
5

I still think it's a long shot to say that Tiktok and the media alone caused a 12 year old to kill her own brother. As I said I'm not ruling it out as a factor. But I'm not gonna rule out other possible theoretical factors until we know for sure. We don't even know if she was on Tiktok and/or how much of the media she's been exposed to.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 01:18 PM
10

To think this doesn't happen, and excuse it as a "low probability", is disgusting. I know it happens and I don't excuse it as low probability. I do think it's a factor. I just think we shouldn't rule out that other factors were at play as well because as of now we don't know. If it turns out she was motivated solely by misandric media then it wouldn't surprise me. But I'm not gonna assume that misandric media was the sole motivator until we know for sure. ​ I don't understand your willingness to…
/r/MensRights01/06/23 08:31 AM
23

I do know how long it's been going on and I know that this girl like most other people have been exposed to it from a young age. What I also know is that despite this most 12 year old girls don't kill their brothers. Do I think that her exposure to misandric media and entertainment might have affected her in someway? Yes that's possible. But I also think there's more to this than just that. As you say it's in every form of media which means that most people see it. Still most people don't kill l…
/r/MensRights01/06/23 08:10 AM
75

I have to agree with you here. Her being 12 doesn't excuse her actions or make them any less evil. But a man bashing article or two on it's own doesn't lead to fratricide.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 05:37 AM
5

Ah sorry mate. Forgot me opinion loicense at home. Silly me!
/r/MensRights01/06/23 05:32 AM
10

If the quotas treat white men unfavourably then that's discriminative on it's own. If a white guy wants to sign up for the army and protect his country then let him do that. At least don't hold him back just because the army isn't "diverse" enough.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 05:31 AM
11

People will probably argue that the men deserve to be in prison because they're violent animals. In the US men get on average 63% longer sentences than women for the same crimes. Men are also 90+% of police murder victims. It's clear that it's not just people that think like this. The law and the justice system think the exact same way.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 08:43 PM
19

Doesn't really matter who did it. Situation remains the same. 276 schoolgirls kidnapped: World panic 344 schoolboys kidnapped: World sleeps It's tragic and depressive how little care and sympathy boys get.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 06:02 PM
336

Branded "useless" because they were white and men. AKA racism and sexism. Oh wait I forgot white men can't be victims of racism and sexism. /s
/r/MensRights31/05/23 05:42 PM
16

I was gonna write about that. But according to DW (Deutsche Welle) Nigerian authorities confirmed a few days after the kidnappings that it was bandits and not Boko Haram that were responsible. Doesn't make it any better of course. I just didn't write about it because of conflicting sources.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 05:39 PM
83

In the three years leading up to the kidnapping of the girls Boko Haram also kidnapped over 10 000 boys. These boys were often forced into battle as child soldiers. Boko Haram even expected them to die and achieve martyrdom. Some newspapers and media outlets did cover the boy kidnappings. But in terms of attention the boys got nothing compared to the girls. Wether it comes down to male disposability or people just straight up not caring it doesn't matter. It's clear celebrities and the majority …
/r/MensRights31/05/23 04:09 PM
8

Thank fuck she'll never see freedom again. They can call her mentally unstable all they want and it might very well be true. But that doesn't change the fact that she's a disgustingly evil creature.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 10:50 AM
1

India has been independent since 1947 and their CO2 emissions by capita didn't really start to rise until the 80's. In 1952 over 80% of China population worked in agriculture. Their industrial revolusion didn't fully start until the 60's and it didn't fully take off until the 70's-80's Are white men at fault for the industrial revolusion. Probably to quite an extent. Are white men at fault for the escalation of the climate crisis? No more than anybody else. Anyway nobody should listen to Jane Fo…
/r/MensRights31/05/23 07:27 AM
1

And last time I checked these countries have no problem doing it cause it makes them trillions. They know about climate change but they don't give one either. The blame is theirs.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 11:09 PM
4

I'm guessing white men are to blame for why China and India are two of the countries with the biggest carbon footprint yes? Japan is also pretty high up on the list. Must be the white man smh.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 08:09 PM
2

These groups rid the men from their right to defend themselves. This includes when false rumors and accusations. They're like ticking bombs for the men who are posted there's lives. It's as simple as that. And they are breaking the law, but nothing will happen. Some of these groups have tens of thousands of members and neither Facebook or any Police departement has done anything about them yet. What makes you think that they will do something in the future?
/r/MensRights30/05/23 08:11 AM
2

So what is the thing that should rightfully be private but is being disclosed here? Imagine going on a date with a woman and afterwards finding out that she posted you onto a group for thousands of women to see even though you only planned on dating her alone. Are you telling me that wouldn't make you feel the least unnerved? ​ The men can certainly receive compensation, if they can prove the libel occurred and they can demonstrate damage to their reputation. Instead of the innocent men having t…
/r/MensRights29/05/23 05:51 PM
2

The right to respect for privacy is what article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and article 12 of the UN Universal Decleration of Human Rights is about. And AWDTSG groups are a problem in several countries. Not just the US. I'm not from the US so the Supreme Court has no effect on my life. The problem is that these forums are not public. AWDTSG groups are locked and for approved members only. So as well as the breach of privacy these men are being robbed of another right. The right…
/r/MensRights29/05/23 03:13 PM
3

Let's see They post pictures of men without their consent. They post the pictures onto closed groups where thousands of women and say and claim anything they want about him without consequence wether they're true or not. Falsely accusing innocent men is easy and is most likely happening actively on there. This unfairly and negatively impacts the mens social life and mental health when they find out. And let's not forget that it's a massive breach of the mens privacy and it's incredibly creepy. I…
/r/MensRights29/05/23 08:32 AM
4

She's been abused in the past, and wanted to make sure she was doing what she thinks was due diligence Her abuse and trauma does not in any way excuse what she did. She posted his picture onto a closed FB group where thousands of strangers can see him and say whatever they want about him without consequenses. That's creepy beyond words and a massive breach of his privacy. ​ That's understandable, but where she's gone isn't a good place. No it's not understandable in the slightest. She needs help…
/r/MensRights29/05/23 08:28 AM
2

If posting his picture onto a closed FB group where thousands of members can say whatever they want about him without his consent didn't seem harmful to her then she needs urgent help. Her perception of the world is clearly skewed and she's not fit for the dating scene. But what's done is done, what she did was deplorable and inexcusable. Not to mention incredibly creepy. In an ideal world she'd be punished by law for this massive breach of his privacy as well.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 08:18 AM
7

One's abuse and trauma does not excuse violating somebody else's privacy like she did. For the regard of his own well being he should definitely leave her.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 06:52 PM
6

Respect is a two way street. AWDTSG groups are one of the most disrespectful concepts to grace the internet. Women who use AWDTSG groups don't deserve respect in that sense.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 06:47 PM
7

The major difference is that when they call, they call a few of their friends. AWDTSG groups have in some instances tens of thousands of members. If a guy is posted on a AWDTSG group for his city or town, then there's a good chance thousands of women in his town or city sees it. Instead of being discussed in a friend group he literally becomes the talk of the town among women to a certain extent.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 06:45 PM
3

"tested" By "tested" you mean "vetted him online" right? Cause that's what she did.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 06:41 PM
4

I'd give her another go, especially if she explained her actions well enough. She vetted him on a closed FB group with (most likely) thousands of members at the least. In an ideal universe he should've been able to report her to the authorities. I wouldn't touch her with a ten feet pole if I was him.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 06:39 PM
4

Don't let all that distract you from the fact that she's still absolutely disgusting for posting an innocent man onto an AWDTSG group.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 06:36 PM
5

And men make up 97% of military deaths. We know "dying for others" pretty good ourselves.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 10:10 AM
1

She's clearly using it in a negative way, otherwise she would've been understanding/calm. It's meant to be insulting cause she's realized that they won't fuck, so she's trying to break him down to help her own self confidence.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:11 AM
3

It's homophobic because she's clearly using it in a negative light "Oh, you don't wanna fuck me? You must be fucking gay then!"
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:28 AM
3

She asked him if he was gay purely because he didn't wanna have sex with her, which is ridiculous and a misuse of the word.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 06:48 AM
69

Are you fucking gay or something? Is that the big deal you didn't do it? "Like what's the issue? Are actually gay and lying?" There, there's the homophobia.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 06:08 AM
1

Exactly, and the people on AITA are basically saying: "It can't possibly be incompetence, there's no way that's the case. It HAS to be sexism" smh. The fact is it can be either or a combination of both. Of course sexism against men and women exist in the work place, but so does incompetence lol.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 08:08 AM
2

YTA, you aren’t a women in tech, you wouldn’t get it. This annoys me a lot, because if you reversed the genders I guarantee you that everybody in the comments would write like they knew every aspect of how a man has it. You'd never see "you're not a male teacher, you wouldn't get it". (Just using teacher as an example as teaching is a female dominated line of work)
/r/MensRights24/04/23 06:35 AM
4

You're probably right. Considering she's a crazy asshole that's activily trying to ruin OP's life there's a good chance the blocking was OP trying to protect himself.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 03:17 PM
6

Better question is what she did that caused him to block her on everything
/r/MensRights16/03/23 01:43 PM
7

Men have real problems, several of them, this is a minute one compared to the other sh*t we go through.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 09:22 PM
1

If you're gonna throw out ad hominems the least you can do is show a speck of originality lol.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 09:21 PM
1

I agree with you, we just have to be careful. Even if it is postpartum psychosis, we can't be sympathetic to the point where we use it as an excuse for something inexcusable. We have to remember that whilst postpartum pshychosis may be a reason, we can't use it to downplay her actions.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:14 AM
1

It’s not a gender issue. You’ve just proven yourself that you also have no regard for the persons mental state, regardless of the persons gender. I do have regard for peoples mental state, before they commit triple pedicide that is. ​ Even her poor husband has said that what happened wasn’t her, that she was sick, and that he forgives her. This does not rip her off any guilt or personal responsibility, neither does the forgiveness from her husband. ​ Belittling, disregarding and ignoring mental …
/r/MensRights09/02/23 12:55 PM
1

I recommend you do some research into the effects of postpartum psychosis, instead of just judging blindly based on the gender of the person involved. If a dad killed his three kids and it turned out he was mentally ill it wouldn't matter to society or people on Reddit. He could've had a million different diagnoses and still nobody would do a second of researching, everybody would be calling for the electric chair. We're not judging based on gender. She's a vile, evil creature that killed her ow…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 08:09 AM
81

He was offered a Premier Inn room... is that it? A room at an Inn, that's it? Not a therapist, not someone to talk to, not even a hug I bet. And people talk about "male privilege" smh.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 08:02 PM
7

Happy cake day 🥳 They've been since they first started, they almost never miss, much thanks to the thorough research that goes behind every post they make
/r/MensRights10/12/22 07:17 PM
8

Men are also less likely to go to hospital and utilize health care visits in general and thats also a fact. Many men who are abused never go to the hospital.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 04:06 PM
4

A lot of people also condemn it, the top comment on the post has 2k more upvotes that the post itself, and that comment criticizes OP. Many people are rightfully calling her manipulative and a creep.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 08:52 AM
2

I mean, the suffragettes were terrorists and they're seen as heroes by many today, so I don't really see why people would find this problematic.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 07:10 AM
2

We've never claimed all women are gold diggers. A lot of us don't believe in marriage because men are routinely fucked over in divorce/family court. We've never claimed feminists should be deported to active war zones ran by terrorist groups. We just think it's terrible that men can be drafted and sent to said war zones against their will. Most people on this sub doesn't want to expand the draft to include women, they wanna abolish the draft entirely. Women has suffered a lot and still are, and …
/r/MensRights02/10/22 06:14 PM
2

It's not okay for us to mock TwoX. Being a member of this sub automatically bans you from posting on several others subs, TrueOffMyChest being one of them. Also, even if what you say is true, the 10% of posts that are shitting on men gets upvoted to high hell and it's what people will see. Just a few months ago there were five different posts on TwoX with thousands of upvotes each where the titles of the posts literally were "I hate men" and "I guess I hate men". Try making a post on Reddit titl…
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:57 PM
1

You clearly haven't seen the huge amount of BS that's posted on TwoX, which is why we make fun of them. I've never made fun of women for their problems, check my profile to see for yourself. I also don't condone people who do. Some people might have yes, every sub has its fair share of bad apples, MensRights and TwoX included.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:45 PM
1

We're making fun of TwoX because, whilst addressing womens issues, it is also a cesspool of people hating on men, genralizing men to fuck and further beyond, whilst also making fun of men like we're all creepy clowns who contribute nothing to society
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:28 PM
1

We don't mock womens problems, and even if we did, womens problems are at least recognized and often done something with.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:03 PM
1

Generalizing men as creeps/pervs is a societal problem that on this occasion manifested itself in a comment section. Is it minor? Yes. Does that make it okay? No
/r/MensRights02/10/22 04:58 PM
1

The post on r/fuckcars was made the day before this post. The generalizing on that post is a part of a way bigger problem of people genralizing men as creeps/pervs. I do acknowledge that many people are creepy, including men. We don't need to be the biggest victims, we already are victims, but society seems to largely neglect that fact
/r/MensRights02/10/22 04:50 PM
1

And you are refusing to see my point. OP did nothing wrong. It doesn't matter that the generalizing comments were deleted, because the worrying thing is that people where quick to generalize in the first place. Those comments shouldn't have been made at all.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:25 PM
1

We want people to stop generalizing.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 11:47 AM
1

It's not my goal at all. The people who's comments where deleted weren't talking about any personal experiences at all, they were straight up saying stuff like "Typical of men" and "Of course, it's men". Even though there comments where deleted, it's scary to know that there're people who generalize that easily. And even though it might not be a huge thing on that post, it's still worth pointing out.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 09:17 AM
1

The comments where only deleted because the mods removed them, meaning that a lot of people still generalize. Men are the victims of generalization.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 08:23 PM
1

It's not generalizing men that's bad, its generalizing in general that's bad. In this case we were the victims of generalization, but that isn't exclusive to men as any group can be generalized.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 10:56 PM
1

OP didn't generalize but when the post was fairly new there were several comments on the post that was generalizing.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:17 PM
1

We don't get hurt, unless they're genralizing. Because genralizing is dangerous
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:38 PM
1

Men are the victims of loads of things. I suggest you check out TheTinMen on Instagram, then you'll see the shit men have to put up with
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:15 PM
1

Why would we wanna be victims on Reddit? I'm a white man, which according to Reddit admins makes it impossible for me to be a victim of racism or sexism. I can't be a victim per the people who run this site.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:01 PM
1

The mods of r/fuckcars might not be, but Reddit certainly are. They don't recognize hate against men as sexism or hate against white people as racism.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 05:52 PM
1

I don't doubt that, just scrolling through the comments yesterday I saw like 10-15 that had been removed by mods, also a few that users had deleted themselves.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 05:29 PM
1

I saw the post on r/fuckcars when it was pretty new, and rechecking it now it seems most of the generalizing and borderline misandrist comments I saw have since been deleted by moderators. Several comments have been removed, so the moderators probably deleted them to keep the discussion civil.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 02:10 PM
1

I saw quite a lot of comments that just said "men", without any specifying. Some people where specifying, some weren't. And its worrying that someone are willing to generalize on something that serious. Edit: Corrected spelling
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:17 AM
1

They're generalizing, it's plain to see. They're saying "men are creeps" instead of "SOME men are creeps", implying that all men are creeps.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:16 AM
1

And then the comment section on that post generalizes to hell and beyond.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 07:28 PM
3

Same old generalizing. Because some men are creeps, people think it's okay to say "men are creeps". Men aren't creeps, SOME men are creeps, most aren't. Don't label all the innocent men as creeps when they aren't.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 10:13 AM
5

It does go for everyone, but apparently a female brain develops quicker than a male brain and therefore they become fully matured/developed before males. That's what just about the entire internet says anyways, not that you should always believe the internet of course. I'm gonna ask my doctor about it next time I have an appointment.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 06:08 PM
2

I am, but I'm not American though, I just feel for young American men.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 05:13 PM
8

We have to change the laws so that women can actually be charged with rape when they do it, like in the UK for an example.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 07:03 AM
16

I completely get your response considering you didn't know the context to my original response. Way to often men positivity posts are swarmed by people commenting "BuT wOmEn".
/r/MensRights11/09/22 10:38 PM
13

I was responding to a guy who outright said that he only thanked men for their achievements, and never thanked women for theirs. The comment was removed by a moderator.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 09:30 PM
16

Nope, we're just paying our respects to one of the greatest inventors off all time, a man that risked his life saving 669 children during WWII, a man that revolutionized agriculture and got a Nobel Peace Prize for it, and the 344 firefighters who gave their lives on 9/11 so that others could live.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 08:20 PM
32

Mf named bozitybozitybopzebop commenting "snowflakes" on a post about men that rescued children from the nazis and men that ran into skyscrapers that were minutes away from collapsing.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 07:11 PM
16

We should thank both men and women. Whilst we definitely should Thanks Nikola Tesla, Nicholas Winton and Norman Borlaug, we should also thank women like Marie Curie, Florence Nightingale and Rosa Parks. Both men and women have done breakthrough work that greatly impacted the world and we should thank them equally.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 07:08 PM
1

No, not "all" the women think differently. I found the thread and read through the comments. Plenty of women told him to get out of that marriage and leave.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 08:10 AM
2

Never seen so much hatred, misandrist, unsupported bullshit in a single comment. You clearly haven't read a single study or statistic on rape. You're a stuck up, rude, condescending person who only cares about their own agenda.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:20 AM
6

FDS has now unprivated the sub but it's inactive. They moved all their activity to their website where you need an account to be active. They have a forum that basically works the same as a subreddit. I visited it and, suprise, it's just as bad as the subreddit.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 07:23 PM
19

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/ Read that article and either: Realize that family court fucks over men and often favors women. Stop patronizing and disrespecting everybody who disagrees with you. If you aren't then respectfully shut the fuck up and leave this sub, this website and ideally the internet all together.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 04:02 PM
2

I wish you too a lovely rest of your day. I also root for you fighting for what you think is right. Im also glad this discussion ended on good terms and not with death wishes as is a common trend here on Reddit.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:15 PM
5

I get what you say but I don't necessarily agree with you. I will keep fronting men's rights until they get the same amount of attention as women's rights. I think we just have to agree to disagree on the insult argument. In my opinion insults will never have a place in debates. You have a different opinion and that I'll respect fully. I know you didn't say insults = good debates, which is good because a debate filled with insults is doomed to be a shitty one. A good debate will have no insults …
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:51 PM
6

No insults can be deemed warranted in a proper discussion and yes your use of insults prove your immaturity. Insults are used in many political debates. That doesn't make the debates good debates just because they're like the majority of them. Imagine not supporting pro-choice for men because SOME men don't feel that way towards women's pro-choice.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:31 PM
9

Its not really about women's and men's rights. It's about principle. If you're not gonna respect my rights I'm not gonna respect yours. Irregardless of what type of rights. The fact that you stand by your insults proves that you're immature and not suited for these types of debates. Political debates should be held with fact based arguments only and maybe some personal views here and there. But there are no room for insults. They bring nothing to the table except toxicity and bitterness.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:59 PM
14

A non sequitur is supposed to be humorous. Calling him brain dead was about as funny as a child's funeral. Once again with the personal attacks. I have a different opinion than you and instead of defending yours you just call me dumb. I know. I'm for abortion as women should have complete rights over their own bodies. That's not even politics that's human rights. The thing is that people are now rightfully pissed at the supreme court because women have lost their right to abortion. However men h…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:34 PM
23

Starting your reply with a personal attack (calling him brain dead) shows that if anyone here is brain dead its you. Its not brain dead in the slightest. Its about mutual respect. If person 1 doesn't support person 2's rights. Then person 2 shouldn't have to support person 1's rights. If men supported women's rights even if women didn't support men's it would lead to a one way street that would damage men in the long run.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:12 PM
2

The fact that our taxing laws are so strict that they're making our billionaires move out of the country makes it hard to label us as neoliberal
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:48 AM
2

Im from Norway, and believe me we are a social democracy, especially with the Labour party leading the current government (a social democratic party). And yes we have more billionaires per capita than the US, but don't forget Norway has a population of 5,5 million compared to the US population of 325 million. And believe me we tax them. As a matter of fact, more and more Norwegian billionaires have been moving out of the country because of our strict taxing laws.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 07:11 AM
3

When you get drafted in Norway you spend a year on a camp ground learning how to be a soldier in a safe environment. The Norwegian military are still active in conflicts in Lebanon, Syria and Iraq, im not sure if you can get forced to go there or not, but 99.9% of people that are called in to military training never set foot in a warzone. A few months ago some people from the army came to my high school to inform us about the military, i think i remember him saying something about the military w…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 10:05 AM
4

I think this is done out of compassion for men to some extent. Theres nothing Norway takes more seriously than equality, also our current government is a social-democratic left leaning one (not to be compared with democrats, the Norwegian politics line is different from the American). Also the reason people found it a bit hard to take Harald Eia seriously in the beginning of the Documentary is, partly at least, that he's a comedian. One of Norways most famous actually, and he's known to focus on…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 07:14 AM
2

You do make a point, however as we all know there are plenty of controlling and domestic abusers who are women. However whenever there's a news article or a post on Reddit about an incident where the abuser was a woman, nobody ever comments "women in general..." or "All women are like this". Women are never generalized, while on the other hand, when the abuser is a man, I've seen people commenting things along the lines of "All men are like this". Some examples of this mindset is when people say…
/r/MensRights01/02/22 09:00 AM
79

The problem feminists have with "not all men" is that they think men only say it to undermine female victims and misogyny when the real reason we say it is to highlight the fact that not all men are rapists, murderers etc. They don't understand how unsure and frail it makes men feel when we're all portrayed as devilish criminals.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 12:08 PM
29

And what really tickles me is that people are always gonna say: "But Dre is worth hundreds of millions." like him being a multi millionaire entitles his ex-wife to anything at all. Dre has worked his ass off with music since the start of NWA and deserves every penny he's earned.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 07:39 AM
54

Nicole Young was the one filed for divorce, and she originally wanted $1.9 million A MONTH. Why? Well, "Ms Young wanted so much because of her extensive monthly outgoings, which include entertainment ($900,000), education ($60,000), laundry and cleaning ($10,000), clothes ($135,000), charitable donations ($120,000), mortgage ($100,000) and 'telephone, cellphone and email' ($20,000)." Absolutely insane, especially considering the reason for the divorce was 'irreconcilable differences' in the marr…
/r/MensRights21/10/21 06:32 AM
3

R.I.P John Christopher Stevens (1960-2012). By far not enough people remember is name.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 07:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter