~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Do fathers get as much appreciation on Fathers Day as mothers do on Mothers Day?They don't - and what some may notice is the ads relating to father's day are for items related to traditional male work like get dad a new lawn mower, a new drill, a new generator. Imagine the howling that would erupt if mothers day ads focused on getting mom a new vacuum, a new washing machine, a new iron.... | /r/MensRights | 09/05/16 08:18 PM |
| 2 | Massive new victory opened up for men in CanadaAgreed. Hell of a good discussion today, by everyone. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 10:21 PM |
| 1 | Massive new victory opened up for men in CanadaI realize fully the Misandry of this verdict. But we need to get the courts or at least the court of public opinion to admit that they willingly hang innocent men as a matter of policy. Eventually, maybe people will say enough is enough. Don't give up. People need to fight for equality. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 09:56 PM |
| 1 | Massive new victory opened up for men in CanadaNot yet. But if she was wronged by the fraud, and aborted the fetus, the corollary would be the ability for men to abort support payments in the case of fraud against him. The problem of course is the child. And as was pointed out directly above, the state would then be responsible for subsidizing the biological function of raising a child, should the fraudster refuse to work. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 09:18 PM |
| 3 | Massive new victory opened up for men in CanadaYou've nailed it. Many people look at parenting as a job. In fact many mothers look at it that way. Of course is not a job. It is a biological function. And of course it is portrayed as a job in the media. It is a biological function, not a job. It may be challenging, but it's not a job. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 07:45 PM |
| 2 | Supreme Court of Canada makes a Troubling Decision about Sabotaging Birth Control and Sexual AssaultMakhSC - I completely agree it is a troubling decision. And the guy was absolutely wrong to do what he did. And he got the punishment. The troubling part of course is the language, 'woman' as opposed to 'person' That is flawed. That's our challenge now, to have that obvious error corrected. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 07:14 PM |
| 0 | Massive new victory opened up for men in CanadaAlso, I want to clarify 'dis-ease' with disease. Pregnancy is a "dis-ease" uncomfortable, not necessarily a pleasant condition. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 06:54 PM |
| -1 | Massive new victory opened up for men in CanadaI hear what you are saying. And public perception has to change, that's why an opposite case must be brought before the courts. And the court of public opinion. We know that women lying about contraception is far more prevalent than men poking hole in condoms. So hopefully we'll see something soon. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 06:52 PM |
| -1 | Massive new victory opened up for men in CanadaYou are right. You argue that the Court deemed pregnancy a disease. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 05:00 PM |
| -2 | Massive new victory opened up for men in CanadaI know they don't call it a dis-ease, although it is. We need to use different words to 'shock' complacent perspectives and jolt people out of defeatist routines. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 04:49 PM |
| 2 | Massive new victory opened up for men in CanadaWell, well, well now, with that attitude positive change will never come will it? ;-) I see great hope. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 04:46 PM |
| 2 | Massive new victory opened up for men in CanadaWell, the courts need to hear some good arguments in the future to bring about positive change, I think we agree on that also. We could argue that the court has declared pregnancy a disease = The bodily harm was the infection of the victim by the pathogen of sperm. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 04:37 PM |
| 5 | Massive new victory opened up for men in CanadaSo if your partner says "I'm using the pill" and she's not, then there is a real risk of harm to the man, for a couple of decades if not forever. I'd argue that it is a serious deprivation for the purpose of fraud (to tell a lie with the intent to cause prejudice.) It seriously affects my ability for consent! | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 04:30 PM |
| 2 | Massive new victory opened up for men in CanadaOne point to argue in this landmark case is that "by removing effective birth control, may constitute a sufficiently serious deprivation for the purposes of fraud vitiating consent under s. 265(3)(c)." | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 04:21 PM |
| 7 | Massive new victory opened up for men in CanadaBut it should be argued as if it did mean equal treatment for men. Often and publicly or change will never happen. How many men have been assaulted by lies about contraception? It is assault against men regardless of what the law currently says. It wasn't considered assault against women prior to this case. Men need to use this and push for equality. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 03:56 PM |
| 3 | Writing a paper for school, looking for counters to claims Feminism makes, as well as inequalities in how women and men are treated.Take a look here. There are sublime inequalities mentioned. http://themenscentre.ca/2013/09/23/who-defines-masculinity/ | /r/MensRights | 24/09/13 04:33 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter