TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Global_Rate3281 Archive

View 0 posts and 144 comments by Global_Rate3281 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

Some of it biological, ie women arent as physically capable of working during and immediately after the pregnancy, some of it is psychological, ie the “motherhood penalty”whereby employers expect mothers to require more work disruptions due to sick kids and so on than fathers, some of it certainly societal expectations, ie fathers often seen as deadbeats if they aren’t breadwinners, etc. I think it’s mostly just inertia, we’ve done it this way forever and so why make major changes now?
/r/MensRights17/06/26 07:10 PM
9

It’s a technology problem affecting men and women if you ask me. It is rotting our brains, it’s reducing our attention spans, it’s retarding people’s social skills and giving them an out whenever they’re in a public place, eroding traditional social spaces, etc. It makes us feel more comfortable with being alone and gives us a false sense of being connected to others while being physically isolated. The answer isn’t that “women suck now” or whatever, it’s really that everybody sort of sucks at s…
/r/MensRights03/06/26 11:25 AM
21

Eh I’m rich and no woman wants me. I’m 6ft tall and have abs too lol. If you’re at all insecure about anything you’re basically screwed regardless of extrinsic factors like wealth, looks, height, etc.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 11:21 AM
5

There’s plenty of innovation occurring in America, it’s just that the innovation is focused on reducing the need for man hours via AI and automation. We could view this as the downfall of society, but if you really think about it lessening the amount of work that needs to be done to keep people alive need not be the end of the world. It should free the society up to pursue more leisure and creative activities. The issue is the distribution problem
/r/MensRights29/05/26 12:59 PM
1

Not sure if men overall shifted right or if it was mostly young men - I’m a materialist so I think that it was primarily the inflation issue, meaning it’s liable to snap back the other way in subsequent election cycles. But I certainly think that the Democrats’ approach to rhetoric has not helped, and they’ve spent far too much time demonizing the right in general by calling them bigoted and fascist and uneducated. I still overall believe the left has economic policy that would help men in a mor…
/r/MensRights15/05/26 01:24 PM
2

They’re not happy to abandon the class bit is my point. I think you’re falsely ascribing the Marxist label to identity politics, which I believe is decidedly anti-Marxist
/r/MensRights15/05/26 01:18 PM
1

I hear this a lot, but to me the race and gender stuff is the exact opposite of Marxism which is solely a class based analysis. So in my view identity politics or anything that seeks to prevent class based consciousness is by nature anti Marxist. Hence why I see left and right wing variants of it.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 05:49 PM
6

I consider myself on the left and I agree with this issue of not looking within to realize the division we are creating with identity politics. I lean Marxist though, so my take is basically that identity politics is a bourgeois strategy to get people to ignore their materialist commonalities. Eg, poor white and black have much more in common materially than rich black and poor black, but the left will appeal to their shared race and history of oppression as a political strategy. And the result …
/r/MensRights13/05/26 12:04 PM
4

You’re basically just talking about identity politics. This is a strategy used by both side to frame the other side as evil and oppressive toward your identity grouping. The left generally focuses on traditional minorities such as LGBT, immigrant, black, and women, while the right focuses on the traditional majority that has now been oppressed by the latter, so white, male, Christian, conservative, traditional, etc. So certainly a correlation with men and white people as they are both traditiona…
/r/MensRights13/05/26 11:47 AM
1

So if any policy benefits only some men but not others, it’s anti-man? What policies do Republicans support that are pro-man and that benefit all men?
/r/MensRights11/05/26 05:05 PM
1

Why? If you have a program which benefits black men, why is that bad for men?
/r/MensRights11/05/26 05:00 PM
-2

A policy to benefit women makes sense, but race wouldn’t necessarily disadvantage men - men of a certain race perhaps, but it would also benefit men of another race
/r/MensRights11/05/26 04:48 PM
-1

Would affirmative action programs benefit the men that get accepted into them?
/r/MensRights11/05/26 04:42 PM
2

Based on what specific policies?
/r/MensRights11/05/26 04:14 PM
1

I think this has been studied and it’s not even close - the reason being women experience actual emotional intimacy in similar fashion to a romantic partner via friendships. Men have no such recourse for emotional intimacy, so they fare worse. Can probably pull the research I’ve glanced at if you’re interested
/r/MensRights10/05/26 01:22 AM
-2

Women can be happy alone. It is way more of a burden for a man. They’ll simply outlast us
/r/MensRights10/05/26 12:55 AM
-8

Women are cool with you checking out. They don’t care. They’d rather fight with 10 women to get 1 man anyhow. You can either try to be that top 10% or you can give up. About that simple
/r/MensRights10/05/26 12:27 AM
-3

All I see is feelings here and emotional arguments - but I don’t see much evidence in the arguments
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:53 PM
-2

Yeah but unattractive could mean something that you’re not considering - for example if a 6’2 chiseled man won’t take no for an answer or gets upset if she says no, that’s an unattractive man. If a really handsome guy keeps staring at her without doing anything, that’s a creepy unattractive guy too. If an average man is kind to her and even keeled in his approach, he’s attractive. That sort of thing
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:52 PM
1

I mean I understand the logic behind what you’re saying, I just don’t see much evidence that it’s true.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:49 PM
0

It barely matters, as stated it’s more about meeting a basic threshold for health and hygiene. Most women would prefer a man be taller than them. That’s about it. If you think you need facial symmetry and a strong jawline and abs, then that indicates insecurity which is unattractive to women. Women expect to be approached because they need secure men to date, and this filters out insecure men unwilling to approach
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:46 PM
-1

Well they are being duped if they’re being filmed for content and not approached for dating. And the act of approaching is actually what makes you attractive to women because it is a display of courage and confidence. Women dont really find men attractive for their physical appearance, assuming basic standards around hygiene and health are met.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:39 PM
-6

Ok good so they want to be approached more. Thats the take home right
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:29 PM
1

I just wonder if men place that expectation onto themselves more so than women - and if I’m wrong, what’s the evidence to support that I’m wrong?
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:29 PM
-4

Based on what evidence exactly?
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:28 PM
-8

Okay but that doesn’t change the fact that we have some pretty reliable evidence using public opinion research that women actually want to be approached more. So a “war on approaching” seems a bit of a sensational way to describe it
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:04 PM
-24

And you’d argue most men are fine with that, but most women that could support that would not be interested? In all likelihood it’s a mix, but really I don’t know. I don’t think there’s any way to really know
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:01 PM
-28

Hard to tell - you’d argue that most men are fine with women earning more than them, but women can’t take it? What about you, would you be alright with a woman being the breadwinner and you doing more traditionally female things in the relationship like cooking and cleaning, running errands, and so on?
/r/MensRights08/05/26 01:47 PM
-9

How to square this with the polling data around women wanting men to approach more?
/r/MensRights08/05/26 12:21 PM
-43

Could be that women don’t like men that despise the fact that they can get an education and a job lol
/r/MensRights08/05/26 11:48 AM
1

Progressive ideology would claim to be pro-man I think. It’s not just about placating women, it’s about creating a different economic system than the one we have now. Progressives claim men are being ground into the dirt by the economic structure and so it has to be changed for the benefit of all (including men).
/r/MensRights07/05/26 11:44 PM
2

I am a 6’2 man and if I ever heard a women say something like “must be over 6ft” or ever reference a height preference, I’m instantly out. She’s allowed to have a preference mind you, but to be overt and broadcast it like that is a gigantic red flag that screams immature.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:52 PM
-1

It is a bit silly to toggle around your blame based on what level of government happens to best suit your side. I’m in a blue city in a red state - I could easily find reasons to blame all our problems on the current federal admin and the state Republican Party for not supporting our city’s initiatives. All three levels of government play a role, as does the market. It makes conditions on the ground in any given place and time quite complex. It’s probably useful to think through what specific po…
/r/MensRights28/04/26 01:27 AM
-5

I still view the left as having a better chance at improving the material conditions and cost of living, which to me is the best way to help all people including men prosper. The right in America has completely given up talking about it and declared that the economy is booming, inflation is solved, and just buy crypto or whatever. You mentioned the housing crisis, if you look for the left and right wing policy platforms, you will notice quickly that one party’s housing platform simply does not e…
/r/MensRights27/04/26 09:42 PM
-2

Yeah but I doubt they’re arresting people and dragging them into a combat role. That’s been proven to be counterproductive. See how he’s dragging his feet and resisting? You think he’s going to be an effective fighter? Perhaps they’ll have him in a support role, strong doubt it’s combat
/r/MensRights25/04/26 11:11 AM
-10

Right so no actual news or reporting at all. Just a video and someone on social media being like “look they’re being sent to war.”
/r/MensRights25/04/26 12:00 AM
-14

Idk - figured there might be some reporting on it. Social media isn’t the news, remember
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:47 PM
-32

I am almost positive this is made up - I guess it’s on me to prove it’s fake. He almost certainly is not being sent to the front, this has been proven to be counter productive
/r/MensRights24/04/26 08:34 PM
1

Ironically only around 10-20% of men approach women regularly. So simply by approaching you’re in the top 10-20%. There is no universal “top 10% of men” as there are too many variables that go into it. You might be top 10% in wealth but bottom 10% in height. Etc
/r/MensRights19/04/26 05:53 PM
1

How do you define "drain on society"? I would surmise that most people on this sub would argue a woman not working in the home raising children is a net contributor to society, and that women working in healthcare is somehow a drain (as you just did). We need to define our parameters
/r/MensRights19/04/26 02:59 PM
1

So if you'd like to see the population tank down to 2 million, presumably women not having children and being independent would be a good thing?
/r/MensRights19/04/26 02:31 PM
1

Feminists have different priorities but yeah at the root of it that’s pretty much it. Just allowing women the same access to society as men. Including the choice to live independently
/r/MensRights19/04/26 01:39 PM
-2

And we’re going to eliminate every other factor on the planet, the hundreds of other variables that go into the desire to have children, and just correlate feminism to birthrates? That is as childish as it can possibly get
/r/MensRights19/04/26 01:10 PM
1

Feminism does want homemaking to be a choice for women - I don’t know what to tell you, you just don’t know what you’re talking about.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 01:08 PM
1

Nope, you don’t know what feminism means either. It’s not anti having children in the slightest. Idk how we can have an honest conversation when you don’t have the most basic grasp of the most basic fundamentals
/r/MensRights19/04/26 01:00 PM
-5

Equality in no regard means forcing outcomes, forcing outcomes would be like OP posted about women needing to breed for the good of society. And unsurprisingly people that oppose feminism desire less freedom for women
/r/MensRights19/04/26 12:28 PM
-9

It’s about equality and freedom to make choices independently of men. That’s it
/r/MensRights19/04/26 12:15 PM
-4

Probly some sort of bot account - if not, then you don’t have a clue what feminism means
/r/MensRights19/04/26 12:02 PM
1

By definition, far left and far right are small minorities. So no, far left and far right aren’t the only options. Statistically speaking, the largest group of men and women in America don’t vote at around 40%, and then around 30% lean left and 30% lean right. Of this 60% of people who vote, a small group would be considered to be far left or far right, with the heavy majority simply leaning in one direction or the other. You’re projecting your own flawed politics onto women. In reality, a prett…
/r/MensRights14/04/26 03:07 PM
1

Bro literally every human prioritizes their own survival, wtf are you talking you doofus. How many women are on welfare, like less than 15%? Gimme a break
/r/MensRights02/04/26 02:47 AM
-10

The men’s rights movement sounds like a victim movement
/r/MensRights25/03/26 11:33 PM
2

That is wildly inaccurate, I’m just saying I’ve never seen it so I would like more context
/r/MensRights24/03/26 05:27 PM
2

I'm asking for a description of said different experiences, and I'm not getting it.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 05:07 PM
2

Actually I am. I’m a straight white man that exists in the belly of the woke liberal beast in all areas of my life, and I’ve never seen this nor felt any desire to do it. I don’t know when or where it would be necessary to do this. Like at work or something?
/r/MensRights24/03/26 04:49 PM
1

Maybe you should dig deeper into these first hand “accounts.” What situation were they identifying as gay in specifically in order to not be viewed as an “oppressor”?
/r/MensRights24/03/26 02:41 PM
11

I think you’ve been spending too much time on the internet my guy
/r/MensRights24/03/26 11:49 AM
3

Yeah those Mormons are really known for their far left feminist views 😂
/r/MensRights23/03/26 03:01 AM
7

Yes, people do not generally start out bitter - women and men alike. Women and men that don’t treat others decently probably experienced poor treatment early on. Hence why it’s important to develop a stronger internal sense of self and not let others dictate how you treat people. The question really is do you WANT to treat others decently or not? No one is forcing you to treat people badly, even if you were treated badly first. Most people that treat others badly frame it as an act of self defen…
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:49 PM
8

This is chicken or the egg, do you receive poor treatment because you don’t give any respect or human decency to women, or do you not give any respect or human decency to women because you’ve received poor treatment? At this point you’re stuck in a cycle - the only way to break it is to do what you can control, so the only options you have are 1) remain in the current cycle where you are neither giving nor receiving human decency, or 2) you become decent yourself regardless of how you’re treated…
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:39 PM
2

Exactly, that’s a prime factor regarding why men have largely been released from their obligation to fight wars over the last couple of generations. That, along with women expanding their rights and independence, are good things. The life expectancy has surged and number of people in poverty has dropped substantially during this period of history we are living in (1950s-present)
/r/MensRights18/03/26 06:06 PM
0

If you had to guess, what percentage of men over the age of 18 globally have fought in a war? I’m gonna guess somewhere in the ballpark of 1%. Probably well under that mark in most civilized places.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 04:42 PM
0

You can’t really leave aside modern technology though. There’s a reason there hasn’t been a war involving tens of millions of ground troops for 80 years. It’s obsolete at this point.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 04:41 PM
7

Lmao that dude at the end, that was literally the face I made
/r/MensRights17/03/26 05:45 PM
2

This was wildly incoherent dude. No offense or anything but this is nonsense. I already told you I don’t believe death threats are acceptable. You’re basically covering up your ears and yelling “nuh uh” at this point. And the quote you posted is basically the exact same thing I said around socioeconomic issues being the root cause of political extremism. Of course like you he makes the mistake of assuming it’s all being generated from the left when we have a violent Christian nationalist right w…
/r/MensRights15/03/26 04:15 PM
1

It’s absurd to suggest that political extremism is one sided, any study of western societies that have experienced political extremism will tell you it’s a force that is not political in nature, rather it is only expressed politically and rooted in socioeconomic and often cultural factors. Extremism becomes significant when these socioeconomic issues grow into a critical mass, and the political system is unable to resolve them. So the Overton window gets blown up and starts extending in both dir…
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:31 PM
0

About what? I said you don’t know what left wing means and then you just said “I met a feminist that blames men for their problems.” So you don’t know what left wing means either dude, you just saw like a blue haired feminist that pissed you off
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:18 PM
-4

Sure, don’t know how that changes what I said though. I would need examples of left wing policy that suggests men are villains, not some feminist being mad at men. I know conservative women pissed off at men too for screwing them over in various ways
/r/MensRights15/03/26 02:08 PM
0

I am a left wing man and my social circle is almost entirely left leaning. Never have I or anyone I know viewed men as “villains of the world.” I mean with a statement like that you may need to take a step back or start over entirely with regards to your understanding of what the left actually is and what it means.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 01:10 PM
3

I can. It’s unacceptable. And they’re not mistreated or vulnerable young men. Doesn’t make any death threat okay, just means that they don’t need or deserve the protection of the “men’s movement.” What about the millions of men about to lose health insurance cuz of Medicaid being slashed or the men that DOGE just axed? Oh wait, fuck them losers am I right?
/r/MensRights15/03/26 02:36 AM
17

These are not vulnerable and mistreated young men. They’re privileged men, sorry children being elevated to significant positions of power on behalf of the richest people on the planet, and their purpose is to inflict as much suffering as possible onto people who actually are vulnerable. Don’t sit here and tell me they’re victims
/r/MensRights14/03/26 05:12 PM
33

1) yes the left wingers on reddit are obnoxious and small minded. 2) DOGE was a disastrous waste of time and billionaire Elon Musk who bought Trumps election being allowed to put autistic children in charge of making illegal cuts to congressionally allocated spending programs that help vulnerable Americans is a mortal threat to our democracy
/r/MensRights14/03/26 02:25 PM
1

If you’re muscular probably a 6-7, if you’re rail skinny a 4-5. If you play guitar or have a hobby you really excel at, it’s +3
/r/MensRights06/03/26 12:50 AM
1

Western women are becoming more assertive (which I have zero issue with), but they still tend to be pretty traditional and passive when it comes to dating. Thus they still expect men to do the bulk of the approaching and asking out and planning and so on. So women are more intimidating these days as they’re more independent and educated and upwardly mobile, but they’re still expecting men to initiate and take the lead in dating. The main ethos of the RP is that you must be assertive and you cann…
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:34 PM
4

But also a lot of American men are too gentle for American women. Eg they aren’t aggressive enough in pursuing, have low self esteem, place women on a pedestal and so on. These are men who would never think to physically harm a woman, but come off as weak and insecure and so therefore don’t get any female attention. Obviously from a woman’s point of view these men are preferable to overly aggressive or violent men, but for lonely and passive men it’s the biggest deal in the world. RP is filled w…
/r/MensRights01/03/26 05:48 PM
3

Women tend to be attracted to social status and social proof, men are attracted to looks. You can achieve some degree of social proof on apps by showing pictures with other people, animals, family, hobbies, etc. But always on dating apps in the back of women’s mind there is the problem of “if this guy is high status why is he resorting to apps”? So apps manipulate this dynamic and it leads women to be highly selective and pretty dismissive of most of the men on there, and thus leads to more men …
/r/MensRights27/02/26 06:08 PM
-2

It’s a technology problem, everyone staring at phone. Simple
/r/MensRights23/02/26 08:53 PM
1

It’s a capitalism issue, grind men into the dirt and toss them aside.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 03:30 PM
3

Because men differ wildly in their politics. It’s about that simple. Most don’t view themselves as oppressed the way this group does, men’s rights movement believers are a tiny fraction of men
/r/MensRights11/02/26 01:21 PM
2

Another good point. Some of these dudes have just decided they wanna hole up in a pillow fort with a no girls allowed sign on it
/r/MensRights07/02/26 09:35 PM
-2

That’s a very good point
/r/MensRights07/02/26 02:25 PM
-2

Not sure about that - I am of the opinion that most women find blue collar work to be very masculine
/r/MensRights07/02/26 02:24 PM
17

Well men are stronger and more physically capable so they have more physically uncomfortable jobs. Office jobs are often deeply uncomfortable too, just in a different way. At least in these blue collar jobs you can talk shit and goof off from time to time and not have to walk on eggshells for fear of HR breathing down your neck.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 01:37 PM
0

I mean diversity hires can be men too, if they’re a different race.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 04:34 PM
-3

Strong disagree there. But it goes to show that men aren’t really a monolith and men’s issues are everywhere. There are millions of men that would benefit from stronger safety net programs like affordable housing and childcare, and millions of men that would grumble about their taxes to pay for it.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 02:23 PM
-7

I’m a man that supports Democrats, men’s issues aren’t limited to being the victims of feminism. Men struggle primarily due to economic concerns in my view, we need substantial economic reforms if we are to see men’s issues addressed
/r/MensRights05/02/26 02:20 PM
2

Is Pete Hegseth also gonna give a speech to them saying they’re all too fat 😂
/r/MensRights05/02/26 12:45 PM
1

Depends on what you mean specifically, you need to go more in depth with regards to what it means to “support men.” Consider two men, each with two kids. One is solidly middle class and wants to save some money for a college fund for his kids and thinks his taxes are too high. Another is just over the poverty line and working as a service worker while trying to go to school and increase his income, but can’t afford childcare or tuition unless it is subsidized or made free of charge. Which sides …
/r/MensRights04/02/26 12:37 PM
-2

Yes
/r/MensRights31/01/26 05:21 AM
-4

Yeah cuz spoiler alert I am the tatted inmate with the footling sandwich. Sorry footlong drill
/r/MensRights31/01/26 04:00 AM
-8

Damn she hardcore
/r/MensRights31/01/26 03:28 AM
-11

You want to talk about breaking the law, the entire DHS operation is a flagrant violation of the law across a multitude of fronts. The head of DHS Kristi Noem is funneling money to friends via a corruption scheme involving an unprecedented $250 million ad budget involving videos of her riding around on horses and shooting guns, with the taxpayer cash going to companies her and her family/friends have a personal stake in. The tactics being used by ICE deprive American citizens of due process, the…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 12:49 PM
1

One guy commenting the blacks have too many kids and that helped destroy America. If you read the comments. Idk he seems trustworthy
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:08 AM
-1

I thought African Americans had bad culture. Now you’re arguing systemic racism?
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:07 AM
3

Can’t tell if black ppl or women or rich ppl. All are blamed on this post
/r/MensRights26/01/26 03:43 AM
-4

Black America has been feminized, is that the argument lmao
/r/MensRights26/01/26 03:43 AM
8

It’s true, Saudi Arabia and Iran are best for men’s rights
/r/MensRights19/01/26 01:59 AM
3

I pretty much agree that DEI is nonsense and horribly divisive, broad agreement from Americans too
/r/MensRights17/01/26 05:54 AM
0

I mostly agree with you, I just think you’re taking it far too seriously. DEI means really pretty much nothing at the end of the day beyond “we support the current thing.” It’s not “destroying the west” or as Charlie Kirk said putting people who can’t fly planes into pilot positions, or anything like that. It’s basically a couple of people at the top of companies or universities or nonprofits deciding to sniff their own farts for a bit
/r/MensRights17/01/26 05:38 AM
-3

True, just saying in America the context of “turning the working class against itself,” it has ALWAYS manifested as white ppl blaming black ppl for being over privileged and coddled. That’s what DEI argument is, that was the argument when the slaves got freed, it was the reconstruction/redemption argument, it was the civil rights argument, the welfare argument, etc.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 05:35 AM
3

Right so you’re saying colleges don’t actually do DEI, which is pretty much true. Think of it more as a marketing mechanism than a serious policy
/r/MensRights17/01/26 05:29 AM
-6

For starters you’re just assuming 50% of applicants are male and 50% are female, so you have to adjust for that which you haven’t done. Young men seem to love people like Charlie Kirk these days who says “absolutely not college; it’s a scam” so it is fairly reasonable to expect that this will have an effect on not applying to go to college. Could simply be that women are boat racing men in being smart about their future and not listening to doofy social media that says education is evil.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 05:13 AM
-9

When you say “turn the working class against itself” you mean black ppl being blamed for white ppls economic problems. Dude that’s like 300 years old in America don’t pretend like this is new
/r/MensRights17/01/26 05:08 AM
-3

Did you just say that women and feminism are responsible for homelessness? Bro no offense you sort of deserve to be made fun of….
/r/MensRights16/01/26 06:36 PM
1

Should check out the Volkisch movement from late modern Germany, sounds up your alley.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 02:06 AM
16

Maybe instead of using general and broad terms like patriarchy and feminism you can talk a little more specifically about issues. Like what is she speaking about exactly when she says patriarchy
/r/MensRights12/01/26 03:38 PM
4

I’m a white male who has yet to see this occurring in my life or anyone around my life. I vote Democrats because they aren’t trying to slash the safety net, kick people receiving housing benefits onto the street, etc, I don’t let social media influencers tell me that my struggles in life are because of minorities getting jobs they don’t deserve - that’s not convincing for me personally.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 03:57 AM
-3

Yeah, well I get rejected plenty. The point is that she’s not like trying to get me arrested now 😂
/r/MensRights09/01/26 05:33 PM
0

I got laughed at plenty in school. It’s an issue yes but it’s something you have to shake off. Same as every woman who had to deal with a traumatic experience as a teen where some creep sexualized or stalked or assaulted her.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 04:41 PM
-6

I’m a man who votes left. This doesn’t have a lick to do with it, let me tell you. If I had to rank my top political issues, my loneliness I don’t think would be in the top 20
/r/MensRights08/01/26 03:52 AM
-2

Can I getta upvote I’m at like -70. Screw it you wanna just get out of here me and you? We don’t belong here. I’ll buy you a drink
/r/MensRights08/01/26 01:01 AM
1

I have gotten blown out before in front of my friends and they respect me for it. Now I get asking out a female friend and having it go sideways, that’s not really approaching a woman though
/r/MensRights07/01/26 08:47 PM
-4

Losing friends 😂 what friends are you losing cuz you said hi to someone?
/r/MensRights07/01/26 08:43 PM
2

I mean I guess I could just take your side also not knowing the whole story?
/r/MensRights07/01/26 08:42 PM
0

Maybe it’s true, maybe not. Doesn’t sound plausible to me that a known liar and thief would be able to get you expelled. Maybe you’re a nutcase. Or maybe you got screwed. But by all means, let it keep you from ever dating again if you want.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 08:31 PM
-1

I don’t know what to say to this - you got expelled because she was stealing things? Huh?
/r/MensRights07/01/26 08:22 PM
-11

A girl laughing at you or ignoring you is not that bad of a situation, unless you’re really insecure.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 08:21 PM
1

I understand too, men just need to be honest and say “I’m afraid of rejection” rather than “I’m afraid of being sued” or whatever. That’s a completely outlandish fear. Fear of rejection is understandable
/r/MensRights07/01/26 08:20 PM
-19

By all means, tell me how you faced legal consequences for saying hello
/r/MensRights07/01/26 02:04 PM
-4

The only outcome you’re gonna get from saying hello or asking for a date is a yes or a no. You’re afraid to do it, so you’ve invented a reason that takes responsibility off your shoulders because otherwise you know you’re just a coward.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 01:02 PM
-9

So a domestic violence case involving a married couple is the same as saying hello 😆. If you’re gonna compare those two things, then yeah it’s basically hopeless for you. Sorry mate. But if you’re done with women then that’s your decision. Garbage rationale though
/r/MensRights07/01/26 12:59 PM
-43

Well, I mean if someone comments “I’m done with women and dating,” the question really is “ok why are you still talking about it” and it becomes rather apparent that most men on here are interested but don’t know what to do. But you can’t help someone that isn’t interested in trying
/r/MensRights07/01/26 02:48 AM
-83

Bro this is the most dramatic thing I’ve ever read. A man’s life has never once been ruined by introducing yourself or saying hello to a woman. The insecurity here jumps off the page, there’s your problem.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 02:46 AM
-45

Nah, men are afraid of rejection not of legal consequences. Any man that convinces himself he’s gonna get arrested for assault for saying hello is a goofball that is probably borderline illiterate. I mean how could you get arrested for assault for introducing yourself 😆
/r/MensRights07/01/26 02:42 AM
-77

Rule 1 is actually don’t be insecure. Claiming that women are about to throw the law at you for saying hello unless you’re tall and super handsome is as insecure as it gets
/r/MensRights07/01/26 01:05 AM
-6

You don’t think it’s a bit overgeneralized to say things like “the left doesn’t want free speech or due process”? I ask because the left is also accusing the right of wanting to get rid of due process and free speech. Might have to be more specific with policies and legislation here
/r/MensRights06/01/26 06:38 PM
-8

I mean are blue haired women’s studies degree holders really the primary characterization of the left, or is this viewing the left through right wing glasses?
/r/MensRights06/01/26 06:10 PM
-6

When have men not been treated as disposable? Is this really a contemporary political issue, or just a human nature/biology issue?
/r/MensRights06/01/26 06:08 PM
2

I wouldn’t say this is because of the left though. It’s much more complex than that, I would say it has more to do with macro level technological and economic shifts that are causing men to be less needed in their historical domain of the workplace. “The left” isn’t responsible for globalization, automation, debt, etc
/r/MensRights06/01/26 06:07 PM
22

I mean let’s be real, who is listening to Scott Galloway
/r/MensRights06/01/26 06:06 PM
-3

You’re describing the cultural/social progressive left, if you think that is only what the left is, that makes you a culture warrior too. In other words you’re woke on the right wing side and think identity politics is paramount over economic issues. You play oppression Olympics same as the left, you just think men are oppressed rather than women, white ppl oppressed over minorities, Christians oppressed over other religions, etc
/r/MensRights06/01/26 05:56 PM
16

I’m economic left - white man who basically rejects woke ideology and identity politics. Don’t think I’m privileged or oppressed really as a white man, though I do recognize and sympathize with issues men face that women don’t. Main dividing line between privilege and oppression is economic, not based on identity. Men and women both have unique struggles but I don’t really think it’s worthwhile to try to play oppression olympics with women. Or to play oppression olympics with other races or reli…
/r/MensRights06/01/26 05:55 PM
6

Short answer is you’re too online and everyone feels they’re victimized and bullied on the internet. Then you go out in the real world and people ignore you, and you project that victimization onto them and wind up believing they’re a part of dehumanizing you. When in reality it’s a technology problem, we’re all sort of dehumanizing each other and don’t interact the way we used to. Idk I’d say try to strive to interact more in real life but who knows if that’s valid anymore honestly. Maybe start…
/r/MensRights04/01/26 01:58 AM
7

Just strip out the social class slice and you have a coherent idea. If you’re wealthy you’re privileged. I say this as a super lib
/r/MensRights30/12/25 08:31 PM
2

Damn bro L dad
/r/MensRights30/12/25 03:40 AM
1

Well I mean the world is somewhat what we make it right? I bet a woke person could walk into the same bookstore and say “wow, there are not nearly enough black authors being featured at the front shelves, this is proof of racist society.” And it would somewhat be unfalsifiable.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 12:47 PM
0

I mean I’m sure my book store has whatever crap that upsets you too in it? Just ignore it and move on, you don’t need to seek out this oppression narrative
/r/MensRights28/12/25 02:10 AM
1

As I’ve gotten older I’ve gotten much more liberal. A lot of my family and friends have struggled and needed help and I don’t want the right wingers slashing food stamps and other public benefits. All the modernized countries have universal healthcare and strong public benefits so I don’t want to see us heading towards third world countries where the poor can’t get helped.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 02:06 AM
0

I went to a book store and got a book on the Chinese Revolution. Maybe you’re looking in the wrong places?
/r/MensRights27/12/25 12:11 PM
4

When you say it’s “drawing in lots of women,” what specifically do you mean by that?
/r/MensRights23/12/25 02:31 AM
-6

Happy to sacrifice immigrants because apparently you e been body shamed. Outright pathetic
/r/MensRights18/12/25 04:45 AM
-18

Yea no shock the mens rights movement likes Trump 😂 bunch of doofuses
/r/MensRights18/12/25 03:52 AM
0

I think the MGTOW thing is about all you can do. Ultimately a “men’s movement” will be viewed by society as being inherently anti-masculine because it’s too whiny. Get rid of social media and find something else to occupy time
/r/MensRights17/12/25 12:07 PM
1

Where are we now?
/r/MensRights17/12/25 12:05 PM
4

This seems a bit biased lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter