TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GloeSticc Archive

View 0 posts and 176 comments by GloeSticc on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Oh ok whoops mb
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:45 PM
2

This just in: people take advantage of the leverage that they possess regardless of gender. Women have the leverage of being perceived as more physically attractive, so it's beneficial for them to maximize that leverage by using makeup to improve their outcomes in life. The same way men rely on their finances in 3rd world countries to improve THEIR outcomes in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:40 PM
0

Below avg. Why does it matter tho?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 03:44 AM
16

Genetically strong = strong fit for the environment Neurotypicality and strong resistance to illness off the top of my head. Could be different in a different environment, but those things generally pertain to all human beings.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 10:13 PM
2

Idk if I can answer that question since it pertains to so many variables and categories.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 09:45 PM
0

That would be a little harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 08:44 PM
39

I think that this question depends on a lot of things. If we're living in the west and I'm genetically weak, I would rather be a woman because there is generally more socialized support and community that is available for women to make well-informed decisions. If we're living in the west and I'm genetically strong, I would rather be a man because women carry more reproductive burden and genetically strong men can usually acquire socialized support and community. If we're not living in the west, …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 08:00 PM
–

Same thing with height theoretically, but it's only a death sentence if the qualities in characteristics such as penis size, breast size, height, or face are important enough to the relationship that it becomes destructive. I don't know many women will tell you that they would break up with a man for not having a "specific axis of pleasure from penetration". Is it ideal to date a man that can't please you in that way? Probably not. But "death sentence?" There must be some other reason other than…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 12:04 AM
1

Which is why I said usually
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 09:04 PM
1

No, but they usually all want to. And if they can and they want to, they will. The same goes for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 07:36 PM
2

It only matters if overall confidence is contingent on being desired sexually. It would make sense to be confident doing something that you're good at, and not being confident doing something that you're bad at. So I'm not sure if people "need" to experience casual sex, rather their quality of life would on average be worse. The "love and connection" tier of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs I would imagine is more difficult for men to acquire, just like how the "safety and security" tier is more diff…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 07:32 PM
1

Literally every person alive as different experiences. Everyone. I don't think it's meaningful to stress something that is inherent to all humans. It's true that everyone has different experiences, and it's also fair to say that it might not be necessarily meaningful to apply this broad of a claim onto social behavior: So when I consider equal relationships, I consider individuals who have the least differences in experiences. I fully understand that all of human history cannot be summed up in a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 01:47 AM
1

I didn’t ask about whether men could share in all the exact same experiences, including the physical experience of childbirth. You’re being a bit obtuse here. You accused me of straw manning the argument earlier, so I was explaining why the argument that I made pertained to the question that you asked earlier, which was: Do you think western women essentially forced western men into being more permissive against their will through their enhanced economic power? Or is it the other way around— tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:54 PM
1

I will not claim it was full equality by any means, but western women were not slaves and they were not property. They absolutely weren't slaves, but just because they weren't slaves doesn't mean that they weren't considered property in the west. Whatever the woman owned, so did the man. Everything that the woman did was facilitated legally by the husband, because women didn't have legal representation apart from marriage until Coverture was established in the 1700-1800s. If "property" is just t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 07:25 PM
2

That’s a reasonabl thought, but I’ll push back on it. Western civilization has been relatively permissive of women for a pretty long time. In particular, western women were generally not forced into marriages against their will and had some limited rights and protections well before technology like the pill. I was under the impression that the basis for western civilization has been through the marriage, in which the woman becomes property of the man. They even take the man's last name because i…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:32 AM
1

Off the top of my head: introducing technology and innovation introduces convenience and optimizes life experiences, which allows both men and women to become more independent from one another and compensate for their individual weaknesses. When women have greater access to things like birth control, advanced weaponry, and social technology, they outsource the purpose of being in a relationship with a man. If men want to have romantic relationships with women, but women have the power to resist …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:48 AM
–

I would imagine for the same reasons women's preferences are shamed among men: it implies that you aren't good enough or valuable. I think that among women there is a greater emphasis on inherent value despite flaws as you said, and the destruction of that belief creates insecurity. If you didn't already believe that you were worth something (many men), not being seen as valuable would matter less.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 10:43 PM
0

If they were truly "decent", they wouldn't have left the dating pool
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 07:23 PM
-1

If we consider men to be responsible for the creation of relationships, and the relationships don't exist, who is to blame? Therefore a single man that doesn't have a relationship is failing under this perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 02:19 PM
–

What does him taking his ex on an exotic trip have to do with me? The same reason any contextual information matters. Like if a man had a criminal record and didn't disclose it, they could very well be a potential danger to the safety of the woman. But you didn't necessarily experience the fact that he was violent. In this case, understanding the difference between where he took his ex and where he took you can reveal WHY he made that decision. Which is important for establishing trust in the re…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 09:07 PM
1

Is that true in all cases? Why does makeup exist? Why does fashion? Appearance serves social functionality for men and women. If appearance wasn't something that was valued, why do these industries exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:13 PM
0

But wasn't your point that it isn't useful as a scare tactic? It absolutely can be if the woman derives value from their appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 04:47 PM
0

I would agree that having children and being single aren't things that women are specifically concerned about, but I would argue that women derive more economic and social power from their appearance than men do (and that gap is decreasing), which can often be qualified by the partner that you have and the children that came from you. While women might not want children and partnership more than their independence and careers, I would argue that they are actually evaluated and valued based on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 04:38 PM
–

This seems like a good strategy to help the person who has decided to end the relationship move on, but that's it. The other person moved on already, doing the same is just fine. We do this with friendships and other relationships all the time without explicit closure.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 11:34 PM
8

Well of course they're unfalsifiable, they are based on the current emotional state and boundaries that the individual is comfortable with.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 01:57 PM
0

The information isn’t “true” it’s what cults do: they take a real concern/ problem that is true and then promise to make it better as long as you follow them. And give them your time and attention and eventually money. All the way stringing you along and making it “us against them- the outsiders” to exploit the follower for as long as possible Which is exactly why I said that the intent for distributing RP information is different than the information contained within the ideology itself. "The r…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 01:31 PM
0

You're conflating the information that the RP posits with the intention for distributing RP information. The information can be true while the intent for distributing it might be exploitative. And also, how are "pills" dumb? They are just a category of beliefs and principles, the same things EVERYONE uses. Pills just actually label a particular ideological position. I could even make a pill right now: "logic pill" which states that we should believe in science. Is that pill dumb? Or rather: is t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 12:56 PM
0

Sure, the current economy incentivizes people to perform a specific way in order to succeed and optimize your resources in America right now. Usually being ambitious, self-centered, etc. But "brainwashing?" That implies some kind of malicious scheme that doesn't align with my understanding of the current economic climate. I think companies are definitely incentivized to keep people dependent on their products, which subsequently leads to a lack of individual control for the consumer, all to keep…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 12:58 AM
2

This is exactly what RP says. Stop chasing, become someone who gets chased. When you drown anyone in attention, the interest in you suddenly becomes abundant and their attention is lost. But when interest is scarce, your attention is more valuable because it is more rare. This is true for both genders, hence why you saw the "I hate my wife" in the 60s when everyone was getting married.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 08:45 PM
-1

If mothers conditioned their children to "appreciate who they are," it would incentivize the children to be complacent with their current abilities. Which would stunt their growth. It's reasonable for any parent to want to motivate their children to grow. Otherwise, you risk the chance of the child's potential growth and happiness becoming stunted.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 02:20 AM
2

Unrelated to the post but I'm in the exact same boat every single holiday.... There seems to be more competition and lack of connection between men because of lingering jealousy or withdrawal whenever a date or a woman is involved. It just creates more division between people and perpetuates the loneliness everyone feels.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:02 AM
–

I think the timing is relative to each individual. The time it takes to trust. But yea it's absolutely true that even if "early on" is relative, it's still true the more interested she is, the earlier on she will want to hook up. I absolutely agree with that. I just think that the timing looks different per individual for how "early on" the timing is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 03:26 PM
–

The only point of contention here is "usually" i think. It seems obvious to me that the less interested someone is in you, the more they will consider alternative options in case you aren't compatible. The less compatible, the slower she likes to take things, usually as a safety precaution and to protect their own time and energy. You're competing against their own emotional baggage when you initiate a relationship proposal. How ready they are, their specific proclivities, their trauma. These th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 11:55 AM
12

The statement, "men will treat you as well or as poor as you let them," is descriptively true, given that every individual is accountable for enforcing their own boundaries. It's equally true for women: "women will treat you as poor as you let them." It's true for any organism that wants to maximize energy ROI. If a person were to make self-deprecating jokes in a social group, it would similarly make sense that others around you would lose respect for your character as a consequence of the decis…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 10:19 PM
1

We might even consider FGM in Africa to be justified because it encourages stable social practices that enhance and encourage their specific societal requirements. Or maybe in India where the caste system serves the same purpose. These are changing overtime, and the reason for these changes are for the same reasons why the initial practices existed to begin with: For societal functionality. Even in your point, if we were to discard people that were less productive, it would establish a low trust…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 06:42 PM
6

Anyone that requires external support (such as red pill advice) instead of having intuitive understanding implies a lack of capability. It makes sense that those who lack capability complain and experience more bitterness.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 05:46 PM
1

It's often a natural arrangement out of necessity, especially in the past because older men retained their reproductive ability and were usually better equiped than younger men to deal with survival stressors, but the current social climate no longer requires the abilities that men have in general. Such as physicality or maintaining family security. I would assume that, since these survival stressors technically still exist, it would be a better option for women to pursue men that they can trust…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:30 AM
1

In that case it's not meaningless. Cooperation and diversification are the MEANS in producing good outcomes in society, and these are represented by establishing rules that maintain societal functionality. That is the meaning of morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:08 AM
4

Everyone declines with age, but older men have the capability to provide more for their partners in many aspects. Emotional security, resources, breadth of experiences, etc. It's true that as women become more independent and therefore less reliant on marriage as a method of survival, the capabilities that older men can provide are less valuable. But this doesn't mean that older men are a bad deal for most women unless you consider that most men in general are a bad deal for most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:57 AM
2

If men aren't meeting the perceived expectations of women, and women are willing to accommodate men in many ways, the lack of reciprocation in their own standards makes them exaggerate and say things like "the bar is in hell?" But even if it's hyperbole, the implication from that statement is: "I've made it easy to keep them around" (women meeting their own expectations) "they want some needs met - they are not" (men not meeting those expectations) So there's an imbalance. Men are not meeting th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 09:46 PM
1

I agree with the premise that expressing romantic interest in a group that has already been established as being platonic could poison the well, and that men could get more ROI from cold approaching just based on the fact that the consequences would probably be less severe, but what kind of relationship would that interaction imply anyways? Granted I wouldn't mind being cold approached, but it does imply a purely transactional interest from the woman. They approached me, not because of my person…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 04:40 AM
–

And I think a lot of it correlates with society itself becoming atomized and hyper-individualistic. And, ironically, we've never been so dependent on existing systems and structures to perform tasks and live conveniently. Kudos to you for pointing out #7, the isolation in younger generations is already widespread and without gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 04:26 AM
0

I was under the impression that, even if it's consensual, it doesn't target any of the underlying problems that cause virginity in the first place. I'm still a virgin, and it's not because I don't understand what I'm "missing out on." Why do people even want sex? Why is virginity cared about to this extent? It's because both indicate that you are valued. That someone might care about you. And this solution does nothing in rectifying the fundamental problem with people that are struggling with th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 08:11 PM
11

I just don't have any reason to think it's even possible for me to become someone capable of that. My social experiences have been a source of pain in my life, and the absence of the experience itself seems like a better option. I'm not saying this is good or how I want to be, though. My poor habits and persistent social anxiety are direct results of trauma that I've experienced, and I would guess the same for everyone else regardless of age. So what makes me so different? Why am I "willing to f…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:20 AM
3

Agreed. It implies that I'm only willing to invest time or energy if the reward corresponds with the effort that I put into something. It's transactional. It's why men are willing to discard women with age, and it's why women are willing to discard men without resources. I don't think people should act because they might get something out of it, I think people should act because it is the right thing to do. But we live in a world that makes it increasingly harder to do the right thing because it…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 09:25 PM
34

22M, and I can only speak for myself, but I don't have any reason to invest in playing the social game. I think people my age, both men and women, have started to slowly understand that our effort rarely equates to a fair reward.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 08:57 PM
2

So because it's something you don't need, you don't feel a vested interest for it. And the reason why is because it doesn't affect you?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 07:58 PM
1

I'm referring to my initial point about empathy. You stated that you don't see my personal agency as leverage, just a fact and that I’m not trying to hold the fact that I am not desperate for a relationship over men’s heads, that’s just their main concern. Since you see your personal agency as a fact RATHER than as as having leverage, it implies that, while perhaps unfortunate, men's struggles are a natural consequence of social progress. and are "just their main concern." My main point was just…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 07:42 AM
0

Why would I be accountable for how someone else values relationships? I haven’t done them any harm by simply not caring as much as they do. I'm not saying you should be. Just that you're doing exactly what my point represents.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 10:48 PM
-1

So because it's something you can't control, you don't feel accountable for it. And the reason why is because it doesn't affect you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 10:40 PM
5

Which is why strength comes from acting despite your feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 07:38 PM
9

I mean having that perspective is fine, but men that purposefully objectify women feel the same way. The reason why women are in this position is because of men's reluctance to treat them as human beings. It's definitely the root cause behind most of the sexual trauma women have. But what do i know.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 06:29 PM
40

I think a big reason for why the "empathy for me but not for thee" just has to do with following the path of least resistance. I look for who has leverage in the modern dating market, and it's women. Why? It makes sense that as time goes on, technology improves, our lives become easier, and relationships lose their immediate practical value as people are able to live independently in comfort. If relationships are now based upon convenience, women will have the leverage because they don't need to…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 05:15 PM
1

Get on your bootstraps fellas. It's rational that no one likes you, and you shouldn't expect things in life if you aren't willing to work for them!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 12:10 AM
2

Is that bias rational? Should we be ok with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 10:12 PM
3

I dont care what actual children whine about. Atleast children are suppose to be that selfish and stupid because theyre new to the world. I think it's important to care about everyone. Even people that we consider to be cruel or annoying. If we were to disregard everyone that we didn't care about, we wouldn't be able to have any advancements as a society. As human beings, we're entirely dependent on one another for everything. For being the logical gender, guys here havent figured out how unsett…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:51 AM
3

“How dare you women not want to support men that you uncomfortable!?” I think it's fine for any person to have boundaries, but you were the one that said that "women are more likely to support guys when guys stop making everything about their dicks." It's a circular argument because you're saying that guys need to improve before being allowed to be improved. Then we’re talking about a man who’s not mentally/emotionally an adult. And therefore.... we shouldn't care? This is concerning to hear as …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 01:50 AM
3

If men are expected to meet the social threshold before receiving support, how can they ever be expected to improve? I mean sure it's easy to say that "men shouldn't care as much about sex!" but how are they meant to do that without guidance? It's circular.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 12:54 AM
2

I absolutely agree that men that don't take accountability for their lives is deeply unattractive and indicative of being childish, but who else is meant to be there for you in your most vulnerable moments? Are men supposed to navigate dating and relationships without feminine support? Is it preferable for a man to be self-taught in how to get laid? I guess I'm wondering: who should teach them then?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 08:57 PM
1

I think, to a certain extent, relationships are losing their tangible value. It's absolutely true that these relationships benefited men far more than they benefited women, especially because in the past there was no recourse for her to live independently. AND there was no birth control. So double trapped. That doesn't exist anymore in the west, there's no tangible reason for her to enter into a relationship anymore if it isn't out of convenience. So: if women had the same incentives to enter in…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 08:46 PM
31

We all know that men wouldn't dare hold on their virginity even if it cost them their own lives, they would accept any offer. Isn't that precisely the reason why male virginity is demonized in the first place? There's an assumption that most men are primarily motivated by sex. If all men are primarily motivated by sex, men that aren't successful at losing their virginity have something wrong with them. The reason why this doesn't make sense is because there is a legitimate differential in how mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 08:06 PM
2

I'm making an assumption that men are being more affected by it because of the differences in motivators between the genders. Largely, they're the same. They both want to eat, fuck, feel secure. This is a VERY COMPLICATED equation, but I see it like this: Men are more biologically inclined to compete against each other. If men are more inclined to compete against each other, it would follow that men have more natural variability compared to women as a consequence (and the fact that they have XY …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 09:05 PM
7

It's way easier to hate someone that doesn't offer anything. If it wasn't that way, people wouldn't feel as motivated to become someone valuable. And honestly no one really likes to hear others complain about things like "anxiety" or "fear" because all of us experience those things, and everyone knows that getting past those is a part of life (aka bootstrap). But obviously, people don't experience emotions in equivalent ways. There are factors that variate the amount that a person can improve or…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 07:16 PM
2

I've been thinking about this recently because I never considered myself masculine or "one of the boys" yet I've also had no experience feeling feminine or "a girly." You're right about the fact that scarcity creates demand. You're also right that as society becomes more individualized, it's helpful to have individual strength (which is the masculine stereotype). I would actually argue that women that DON'T adopt a more stereotypical masculine set of values and behaviors will detriment their lif…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 11:56 PM
3

If someone were treated horribly by everyone, rejected by everyone, and not loved in any meaningful capacity, this person would probably learn that they don't matter as much as other people. And are consequently rewarded less. The issue that arises with this idea has to do with accountability, almost entirely. No one disagrees with the idea of privilege and that it exists unfairly. But when we have to measure how accountable we are for our outcomes in life, people have different opinions. I gues…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 07:13 AM
2

I don't mind content that attempts to explain how the "dating sphere really works," especially if it's open minded, but Psyhacks doesn't do that. A lot of his talking points are abstractions based upon existing premises, and he doesn't use much empirical data to back up his claims. Tbh I'll admit that I watch Psyhacks, and most of what he says makes sense to me at least logically. But I can also admit that I'm biased, and his perspective about what makes dating hard for men is what makes his con…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 07:14 PM
8

It's just people wanting to have their cake and eat it too. Most people desire to fit in socially and will therefore have empathy towards people who might be awkward. It benefits them to relate to others because it strengthens the bond and level of understanding between everyone. The same could be said oppositely, especially in more masculine groups that aren't as inclusive. Most people also have sexual desires and are more than happy to disregard any previously held principles because they're h…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 01:56 AM
15

No one is entitled to anything in life. In the same way, some people are born into adject poverty and lifelong misery, some people are given everything and never experience much suffering. Currently, we exist in a period where this particular problem is relevant for men, and it might be "unequal" or "unfair," but what does it mean to resolve this issue? Women don't desire men as much, and changing that desire forcefully would be slavery. So if you can't change their desire, the burden is on the …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 03:47 PM
2

If they were, we would have entirely different social structures in relation to gender. Much of male socialization is predicted on competition and hierarchy, which makes it hard to succeed in a male social space if you are a compassionate person. I think that, especially recently, this social habit has decayed as gender has become less important in societal growth. Maybe one day, these habits will destroy the sexual dimorphism in our species, which is probably the conflicting element with societ…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 03:10 PM
7

It's no surprise that they would say that. men CAN be dangerous. It's better safe than sorry most of the time for women. If I had a daughter, I would be wary too.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 02:53 PM
1

They have more options, so they can afford to be picky. Men are the exact same way given the same circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 12:53 PM
1

I agree that men are in greater abundance and are therefore more replaceable. But I also think that men who have had dating experiences will have a much easier time dating in the future. Experience begets experience and so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:45 PM
1

That sounds like a normal human feeling. Liking the people that you trust, fearful of those that you don't. Especially in a demographic that experiences more gendered violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 11:09 AM
5

Easy according to what? I don't disagree that dating can be easy, but if men aren't getting into as many relationships, it is by definition not easier as long as men actually want to date. Which is usually the case as far as I know. so "how easy it actually is" seems shortsighted to the extent that it ignores the outcomes that exist in the current dating landscape. Easy for you? Easy for everyone? Maybe I'm not understanding your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 06:31 PM
–

Aren't men incentivized to be more interesting? They're usually the ones competing for scarce resources and, therefore, tend to have more variance. So there are probably more men that differ from the mean when compared to women. If "boring" is defined as particularly relating to the mean, men will be less boring. But that's under the assumption that they male variability hypothesis can be extrapolated to more than just intelligence. So, I guess what I said can be disregarded to the extent that m…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 12:43 PM
0

If i were reducing human beings down to being animals, I might consider the sexual tendencies that occur within us have emergent biological tendencies. For example, we kill male livestock for food because they are less reproductively valuable. You don't need many males in repopulation. Moreover, males aren't as burdened by sexual intercourse, as there isn't an immediate physical consequence. Since more men aren't needed to reproduce and they don't bear as much of a burden in sexual intercourse, …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 06:20 PM
3

True. But it's usually not the ones complaining, which is whom I was referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 10:06 PM
8

Perhaps finding alternative ways to satisfy sexual / emotional needs that exist outside of what it traditionally recognized for men or placing fewer expectations on women. Destigmatizing singleness, being more willing to create deeper relationships with other men, which would take the burden off of women to provide emotional security for them. It sucks to feel useless. That's where a lot of these men are at. They just don't know how to respond to it. I think you're justified in expecting them to…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:16 PM
8

It's easier than accepting and coming to terms with their own inferiority. It is absolutely brutal if you live at the bottom of the social hierarchy and have absolutely no support and no way to establish a positive feedback loop. Positive experiences beget positive experiences. The same goes for negative experiences. The same is true for hatred. You're right. Men can't complain their way to sex and relationships. It's antithetical to building any relationship: be it sexual or platonic. But while…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 04:42 PM
1

I think it depends. For men that are meeting their percieved social needs, it's likely to be less of an issue. For men that aren't, sex and relationships will likely take up more mental space. I've said this before, but I think because of the lack of reliable social networks (or even a lack of emotional self-awareness), men idealize what a woman might provide for them. Like a "cure." For me, I think about it everyday. Not necessarily sex or individual attractive women; but rather the relationshi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 03:54 PM
1

On first glance the interview does seem like a bait, but I actually don't think it's necessarily wrong depending on the circumstances. Anything under 99% would be technically settling, I just think that--contingent on the supply and demand of the regional dating scene--certain groups will be more willing to settle than others. Especially if the economic or social incentives are destroyed with respect to long-term relationships. In a region like Scandanavia? They have the highest rates of singlen…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 08:17 PM
3

Evolution itself is dependent on the environment; what conditions exist for life forms directly correlate with their survival preferences. "stereotypical masculinity" is only useful insofar as it can provide a greater quality of life. "Men are the way they are, because that's been the most successful type to be to reproduce." I mean I agree with this technically but I don't think it means that stereotypical masculinity is something that's inherently more reproductively valuable. Preferences aren…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 05:56 PM
1

I think that most men actually put too great an emphasis on how they look (and women too honestly)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 02:00 AM
1

I would argue that men and women are equally hypergamous; it's just a matter of who has the greater demand in the sexual marketplace. Some people need to "settle" more than others. Men are going to want to get the best slice of the pie if they have the option to. You could easily frame this to the other gender though. I just don't think that men in 2025 are as reproductively valuable enough for women to complain about it. Women complain about "toxic masculinity" and yet seek out partners that ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 01:56 AM
5

Divorce is probably harder on the person that was more dependent on their spouse. In countries where gender essentiallism is practiced and legally enforced, the woman most definitely will suffer more because of a lack of upward mobility with their life in regards to creating wealth for them or their children. In the west, if both parents are working and the woman is still doing all of the parenting, the woman will only suffer more if the man's income is essential to their wellbeing. Otherwise, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 03:40 PM
0

I agree with this theoretically; "love" and "marriage" as it's represented in 2025 is unrealistic for many people and should be decentered. It is probably the case that most people misplace their own insecurities in the social game and wind up becoming obsessed with the concept of a romantic ideal. My idea? We live in a competitive environment with a scarcity and abundance of resources. Status, wealth, attention, etc. exist as a supply and demand structure. Humans are pack animals: it is probabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 02:48 PM
6

It's true that there's necessarily a "supply and demand" economy. If women cared more extensively about sexual experiences, men wouldn't need to care as much. Men care about sex as much as they do because of it's scarcity, same as any useful resource that's rare. For the same reason, women are more hesitant to engage in sexual experiences. You aren't ever going to be desperate or emotionally turbulent in the sexual marketplace because of the abundance of options. You'll be pickier. And you're ri…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:52 PM
2

I think that respect is what is usually appreciated. Not necessarily a specific behavior, or "reading body language." It's all contextual; what matters the most is that the man (or the woman) doesn't see their partner as being something that's "underneath" them or disposable. What are the implications to this kind of a mindset? The biggest one that I can think of is breaching boundaries. Why would you care about the wants/needs of someone you don't respect? That's the mindset. And what follows i…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 04:12 PM
2

I mean if you're a man that's confident, ambitious, and brave, it probably means that you at least have an interesting life. Those qualities imply a person that seeks challenges (and therefore growth). If you're a person that seeks challenges, you probably have more enjoyment and satisfaction in your personal life, and THAT is attractive. Hate, resentment, insecurity, etc is exhausting to deal with, no one wants to be around misery. It stifles growth and personal satisfaction. It probably is as …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 01:52 PM
12

Because that's how they're valued, usually. I think if a lot of men stopped caring about "societal norms," a lot of people would stop caring about them as a response. Even more so than what we see currently. Men benefit more on playing the game of "society." They also get more disadvantaged if they don't play the game of "society."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 11:57 PM
-1

I mean, I don't disagree with the premise. Just with: And it will all be totally fine. This abudnance of options will just expedite the problems that exist with modern society. An "isular and isolated and individualistic" society is diametrically opposed to how human beings have historically existed. You're right in saying that men aren't "needed," but what are the long term consequences of that? I think to myself: what creates purpose? What makes people get out of bed in the morning to accompli…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 04:30 PM
13

We're unfortunately starting to transition into a period of time where people can cope with their desires by embracing escapism. It takes a lot more time, energy, risk, resources in pursuing human-based solutions. Lonely? Use generative AI chatbots and porn. It gives you immediate dopamine and won't complain about your weird fetishes. Thanks to technology, men and women both can theoretically simulate a sexual and emotional experience without actually having to take on the risk of rejection or l…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 07:50 PM
12

It should happen, ideally. Our social structures in America aren't very conducive to establishing healthy relationships though. No third spaces, hustle culture, individualism, etc. America hosting a competitive environment incentivizes people to destroy weakness, which further creates a rift between those that are successful and those that are not. This gap is just a symptom of a greater societal blight that drives people away from each other through a scarcity of resources, be it friendships, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 06:16 PM
24

There's just not as much of an incentive for women nowadays to get into relationships. Men too. I speculate that women often have more emotional support networks within friendships, and are therefore better able to handle their emotional needs safely. Because men don't have that as much, I think they look at a relationships as a "cure" for their physical and emotional needs, which creates a frankly unrealistic expectation (and can make the recieving end uncomfortable). I think that expectation c…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 03:14 PM
2

It's just social posturing. Men do it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 01:58 PM
3

I mean "value" as defined as what society and those that prioritize it are incentivized to care about. Things like wealth, status, etc. I think that there are a lot of traits that can benefit others without necessarily being practically useful to the modern zetigeist. Like someone might be intelligent in a vacuum, and that might be a "valuable" trait. But if that intelligence doesn't have a platform to be used with, it won't matter. Many autistic people have the problem where their skills aren't…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 03:50 PM
9

Our society is transactional, just how it is. I know that men and women have certain traits that are more valuable at a macro level. I don't even think that it's wrong either; just that it leads to divisions in our current civilization structure. I would assume that these divisions cause more harm than good, especially because there's a lot of value that people can have outside of what is stereotypically recognized as being "attractive." But yea maybe we're all just animals succumbing to biologi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 01:12 AM
17

Thank you for that! I appreciate posts like this that try to bridge the gap instead of widening it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 07:45 PM
29

I would like to think that the reason why men and women behave the way that they do is because of their learned experiences. If many young men are voting for right-wing policies, it's probably because they feel like it will improve their lives in some way, even if it's only ideological improvement. I can speak for myself: I'm what most would call "low value". I don't have a job that pays well, I'm not attractive, and I'm not great at socializing. I learned as a child to self-isolate, and my life…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 07:33 PM
2

True, at the end of the day, most people are probably selfish and project their emotions onto other people. Usually while justifying it under some worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 10:16 PM
3

Women are loved under the assumption that they can produce healthy children, though. An old woman is not loved unconditionally. Neither is a disabled woman that can't have sex. Everyone has conditions to be deemed valuable, it's a result of evolution as well as this blighted societal system that we've developed...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 10:10 PM
1

I don't mean war in a literal sense. I meant "war" symbolically, as a diametric opposition to what men are currently doing. Men are opting out of relationships and becoming bitter, and I see that as avoiding the problem. Going to "war" just means becoming better versions of themselves - and I fear that is not happening currently.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 02:12 AM
0

Avoiding the problem is usually worse than dealing with it. At least war has the possibility of improving something. I would like to think that men and women aren't that different from each other, and most of this discontent is a symptom of a sick society. but who knows maybe I'm wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 01:57 AM
3

If you reduce the value of men down soley to being a "collector of resources," you're probably right. Women have the opportunity to collect resources themselves, displacing the purpose that men have had. Unfortunately, we're also getting to a point in time where men are distancing themselves and using escapism to cope with this displacement; that being the use of ai and other sex-oriented tools that are designed to imitate the value that a woman can give a man (sex, as you stated). I would bet t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 09:57 PM
–

Other people help other people. Having a good social circle of people that care about you and doing fun things with them can encourage a healthy outlook on life. I'm guessing "drinking," "partying," and "doing drugs" are contributed by the fact that there's social pressure. Sure, that might be bad. But I would posit that it's more positive than negative: it gives people experiences that might lead to new opportunities. If you're by yourself all the time, who's influencing you to do these things?…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 07:03 PM
1

There's abundance. That's why it's difficult. Women are in positions where men aren't as necessary. So they can be pickier.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 03:51 AM
4

I guess it would be more accurate in saying that there are more "possibilities." More people can travel, more people can access social media, more people have the ability to compare potential partners. Same with jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 03:28 AM
9

I think this has more to do with where our projected course as a society is going rather than men. People are just becoming lazier; there are many more readily available opportunities in most aspects in life (at least in the west). This applies to dating, working, educating, etc. With abundance comes competition, though. If it's easier to do these things, it's likely to become inundated with willing participants. You have to be bigger, better, more capable, and more attractive in order to succee…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 11:18 PM
4

It's true that men generally are motivated by physical features. Obviously, they aren't brainless monsters that that only want to "boost their own ego and cum." I could strawman a woman's motivation in the exact same way. They're people, just like you: with desires, fears, and concerns. What I suspect is that men need SOO much more from women than women need from men. I guarentee that most of them need the emotional support and affection, even if it's not obvious. It's a need for them, and if it…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 03:49 PM
1

I mean isn't it definitionally correct though? Some people are just not as capable as other people, regardless of gender. Life itself kinda incentivizes people to look at these things as "transactional." It obviously is not the fault of disabled people that their disability exists, but they are just likely to be less functionally competent in soceity. They just don't provide as much. Since, often times, men are valued for what they can provide, It would make sense that this sentiment exists more…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 06:21 PM
1

I don't want to believe that men could be satisfied through porn and escapism, which is kind of the final product that I fear "decentering women" creates. Gen z does have political divisiveness between the genders, which indicates a disconnect. I think the way forwards is through individual purpose, sure, but I also think that it's actually good that men have a motivator to actually improve themselves. It's just unfortunate that no one seems to have empathy for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 12:08 AM
7

You're right in that you shouldn't worry about things that you can't control—a direct consequence being that men need to decenter women in their lives. Except........ that there are certain needs that exist. And when those needs aren't met, there is suffering. I would argue that is it BECAUSE of that suffering that we see these MGTOW movements. The solution will never be to decenter women, because that effectively tells a group of people that their needs will never be met (and that causes a lot …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 09:30 PM
20

Wow, you worded that nicely. Why would you say that men are deemed as more inherently disposable? Does it have to do with our biology (being that one fit man can reproduce 1000s of times compared to a woman) or rather with how society has always been structured?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 01:46 AM
1

I mostly agree with that statement, but wouldn't that contradict the purpose of your post?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:38 PM
3

Men just aren't perceived as valuable rn in terms of relationships. You need to provide something significant to stand out from all of the other sausages. In the dating scene, the analogy actually makes sense to me. Men need women more than the other way around, or at least that's what the data indicates. If you're in the desert, you probably aren't going to care as much if the water is clean or not. Honestly? I don't see why people have such a problem with this decision making process. Men woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:20 PM
1

It's not just about direct harrassment. I mean that men literally value womens bodies to the point where most of the other qualities about them don't matter as much. As a result, it impacts the decision making process that men go through. Could be something as simple as not holding the door open for an ugly woman and immediately complimenting and opening the door for an attractive women afterwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 09:35 PM
2

Yea it helps when the person that you're dating actually finds you attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 04:26 PM
1

Idk. I wouldn't say "respected." I don't see respect from either gender, and especially not from men. I think female bodies are more "valued" if I had to choose a word to describe it. I think people don't care as much about the male body, and there's positive and negative consequences from that assessment. Women are the opposite; they have to deal with the consequences of people caring too much about their body. Maybe they're harrassed. Maybe they're respected and loved.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 02:01 PM
–

Honestly I know it's fallacious of me to say but I feel like we just don't fucking need men. Like there's just too many. We aren't living in a period of time where the qualities that men best exemplify can be utilized effectively. For many men living in the west, it's like a square peg in a round hole. ADHD, uni statistics, crime statistics, etc. They probably would have found more purpose if they had been born in a third world country or 70 yrs ago or some shit. It's why I have my flair the way…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 11:02 PM
6

Both genders would be happier if demand for each other were equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:48 PM
1

Men are just willing to SETTLE for less valuable women, likely because of the availability of options. It also makes them desperate and icky.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 03:15 PM
1

Looks like men as a collective unit need to reframe societal expectations and biological impulses...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 01:48 PM
5

Fatherhood would never exist without a father. Someone's dick should've been somewhere else if they didn't want to be a father.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 02:22 PM
1

Imo feminism wasn't ever REALLY about getting equal legal representation. It was always about destroying the social conditioning that had led to a patriarchal society. Getting legal representation is a part of the goal of feminism, but it doesn't represent the entirety of the movement. If you're unconvinced that a patriarchal society existed in the first place, I'd say you're blind.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 02:09 PM
3

Of course. Most men could potentially physically overpower women, and it's been demonstrated that men would be more likely to sexually assault women than the other way around. There needs to be some sacrifices if we all want to live together peacefully.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 01:58 AM
1

We've entered an age of poor social conditioning. There has been a distinct lack of space to meet people even compared to a decade ago. I see relationship issues as less of a gendered problem and more of a socialization problem, and I would speculate that the dating critiques that we put on "men" and "women" are just a residual effect of an isolated population. I do NOT consider online spaces to be a valuable form of interpersonal communication. If anything, it creates too many assumptions about…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 11:03 PM
0

This is generally true just from my experience
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 10:55 PM
1

You sound like a good parent☺️
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 10:52 PM
6

ahem it isn't work if you like it.......
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 07:29 AM
2

Virginity indicates social ineptitude much of the time. Where possible, I would always prefer to have an experience rather than nothing. First-hand experience in any activity is important; it gives you a platform to make better decisions in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 03:08 AM
2

Men are at an advantage physically while also representing a higher level of aggression. I would think that, given this circumstance, it would seem natural for women to portray some hesitation to men. This distinction strikes me as important because most people generalize when labeling people, and the word "creepy" is usually used as a sweeping statement to clarify the various aspects of a person feeling "off."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 07:06 AM
0

I was under the impression that most women are being covertly infantilized, if not directly infantilized.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 12:35 AM
1

If my objective is to find a relationship, it would be detrimental to not care about what they find attractive. All of us, constantly, are playing the social game. We're all trying to fit in and gain other people's trust and approval. It certainly wouldn't be different in this case. Some people have had good upbringings. They might be confident, well groomed, emotionally intelligent, or just genuinely kind. Those kinds of people wouldn't need to bother with gaining other people's approval. It ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 09:08 PM
1

I was referring to the subject of the discussion, which was mainly focused on mental health. I would assume that emotional intelligence could be used to diagnose mental health problems or at least seek support. I'm also aware that some people can't push past their problems. That's just life. But we can all try, and that's what's important.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 09:34 AM
3

People are suffering, but they aren't self-aware, resourceful, or emotionally intelligent enough to produce a long-lasting solution for their issues. It happens for both men and women. In my experience, being able to muster the courage to fight against that suffering is by far the hardest step. So, instead of fighting, they just whine. And people who have actually put in that work struggle to empathize with someone who won't take responsibility for their problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 08:47 PM
–

Lookism is real, I don't think anyone contests that. People who can get away with this kind of behavior will continue to do so until they're incentivized to change. Hot women use men, and hot men use women. Rich men use women, and rich women use men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 09:55 AM
27

Lmao, everyone is complaining about "generalizations," but that is literally the point of this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 06:58 PM
1

Doesn't feminism use the privileges that men have to compare and advocate for the rights of women, though? Wouldn't it be more accurate to say "bettering women as compared to men" instead of just "bettering women"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 11:21 AM
6

I was under the impression that the usual social stigma against "sleeping around" was normally directed at women. Men are usually celebrated for their sexual accomplishments, and women are usually shamed.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 06:18 PM
2

The more normal you are, the more in common you have with other people. People usually look for like-minded company. I would assume this works both ways, but I'm not sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 08:29 AM
1

50/50. It's best for both parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 01:35 AM
2

Tall and charismatic without being obese or having a hideous face, at least for men. Maybe like a 5/10 face and like 5'10+ would be sufficient for most of the population if he was well socialized and responsible. I think appearance usually matters more for women, just based off my own intuition and experiences lol, so maybe a 7/10 face and not overweight (or crazy) would also be sufficient for most of the population. I don't think men need to put as much effort into appearance, and I don't think…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 10:06 PM
0

This kind of mirrors sexual survival of the fittest for men. It won't change, I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 11:12 PM
1

It's unfortunate. A lot of people have built up resentment from their perceived value in the dating market, making them feel unwanted and unloved. What follows isn't usually a careful reflection and genuine effort to be a good person. I think most people would like to think they are good people, and since they see themselves as worthless in the dating market, it would make sense that they don't consider how "good" they are when considering why no one loves them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:00 AM
1

As far as I know, the vast majority of men are normally the ones competing for women, not the other way around. So, men needing a woman's approval seems like an appropriate consequence. There's not much we can do about it systemically. Another weird consequence might be the objectification of women, like you mentioned. It's all super unhealthy and has repercussions for both parties. Nature can be cruel, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:45 AM
–

A lot of it is biology, I would assume. Taller people are associated with health since malnutrition stunts growth.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:02 PM
–

Not to be all "it's over bro" but some people, especially people who aren't well socialized, might have such a difficult time finding a relationship that it might as well be impossible. I mean, it's like that with wealth, too. Some people just aren't cut out for human existence as well as others. But tbh that isn't a good reason to give up, as those circumstances weren't in your control. It's also important to recognize that women might also be in a similar situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 04:39 AM
1

The stereotype is that men desire looks, women desire security, I think. Usually, men are taught to be successful, and women will follow. The same way men will follow if a woman is attractive. But yeah, physical attractiveness is a little undervalued in a male's childhood. Parents should focus on that a little more.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 11:24 AM
0

Well, reproduction and intimacy are pretty much requirements when it comes to having your needs met. I think it's the third layer on Maslow's hierarchy of needs. I've had my fair-share of black-pill phases. I'm not even sure if I've grown out of it yet. I just don't think that it's conducive to becoming happier, regardless of the legitimacy of the theory. I just know that the "it's over bro" mindset is cringe: it doesn't promote any forward momentum. It gives you a reason to give up. I'll admit …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 11:16 AM
1

Men who have had relationships are probably more likely to be better at having a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 05:56 PM
2

💀
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/23 12:26 AM
1

173cm 55kg (M). Used to be in shape.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 06:33 PM
2

Tom Holland is actually shorter. He scrapes 5'7.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 03:37 PM
5

Agree 👍 all of those points have strictly to do with human rights and anatomy
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 06:46 PM
1

From my very ignorant and limited perspective, men probably are the greater evil when it comes to relationship stability. From what I usually see, men are too nonchalant and disregarding of the partner, and women are too picky or aggravated about things. There are exceptions ofc, and ik I'm probably wrong but I'm just going from my direct experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/21 07:26 AM
0

Men "hunt". Women have to be the ones to attract men because they are the ones who are being chosen. Or that's how dating works at an animalistic level. It could easily be the other way around, but we are led to believe that it is generally men who should pursue, and women who should attract.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 11:29 PM
1

It gives them an answer. A seemingly clear answer to define themselves and other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 03:31 AM
3

Nuh uh! Women only like giga chads that are huge and alpha! They only chase top 1 % men! I know this because I never get the girls so its obviously true!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:16 AM
1

Damn and thats putting it lightly too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 10:12 PM
3

Tf is this
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 09:48 PM
3

You don't have to be red pilled to be a good person. Where did you get that idea lmao...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 04:53 AM
1

100% agree with the "utility vs character" argument that you said. But, I don't think that it would apply to women more than men, and if it did, men objectify just as much as women. Like I said, the people that do these kinds of a thing are just bad people, and doesn't have anything to do with gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 03:48 AM
2

"Utility to themselves"? Are you talking about gold diggers? Those are just bad people. Playing with people's emotions and using them for sex is bad no matter how you look at it. Doesn't matter if they "deserve it".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 08:48 PM
4

TRP objectives women and puts down men. I don't agree with manipulation to get sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 05:52 PM
1

I don't think that humans should be considered "valuable" or "not valuable". We're all just people...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 04:59 PM
10

I think that's true. I don't want to generalize genders, but I think people who don't feel anything have different ways of ending relationships. People who have been preparing have an easier time moving on because they are prepared.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 06:33 PM
1

I think its fair to say being protected and cared for is really cool
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/20 01:26 AM
1

No lol. Doesnt mean that at all. Its just a stimulation tool similar to how female toys work. Different sensations to how ur hands feel, and thats about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/20 01:19 AM
1

I think that you're underestimating men and their ability to be emotional and empathetic...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/20 01:16 AM
1

Bruh I want that and Im a dude
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/20 01:15 AM
1

I dont really think that you're thinking about this the right way dude. Be a good man, someone you would look up to and be envious of. Don't think of using these traits to get rewards, just be a good person.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/20 01:13 AM
0

I get those nice guy tendencies. I always wanna blame the other person for anything I can. I don't really want to project these feelings so i just dont date to spare others from myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/20 01:08 AM
6

Standards are fine. What you're doing is stripping them of their humanity, and only allowing them to be yours to manipulate. I hope they see you for who you are...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/20 02:10 AM
2

Im not going to apologize for believing that people shouldn't be judged by their gender. I know I might be ignorant or stupid or whatever, but it just makes me sick to see someone so bitter about something so unnecessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/20 02:09 AM
4

Dude thats so not true. Quit viewing people for their gender, and look at their personal achievements. People like you make this world a worse place to live.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/20 01:27 AM
8

This cant be real... no way are you actually being serious rignt now
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/20 01:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter