GnarlyBear Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
13	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. It might be due to the common themes in this thread - people who have had it done without incident feel defensive when the practice is discussed negatively by those they would otherwise identify with. Your relatives are really more concerned about what you think of their circumcised state and not your child's uncircumcised one. Maybe? Just thinking out loud as the US really is the odd one out in the western world.	/r/MensRights	13/03/17 12:39 AM
7	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. In Spain it's pretty much done asap, it's bananas.	/r/MensRights	12/03/17 09:56 PM
7	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. I reckon it could easy when taken as its own piece and stretched out. That's only 3x4	/r/MensRights	12/03/17 09:55 PM
6	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. Anecdotal I know but the few Americans I have discussed this with (used to live in Houston) were circumcised without complaint but did not intend to have their children chopped. The two who had it done said it was the wife's pressure to do it which made it happen.	/r/MensRights	12/03/17 09:51 PM
7	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. Genuine question to American parents in this thread - was the circumcision included in your insurance? What was the additional cost? Or is it part of the package?	/r/MensRights	12/03/17 09:46 PM